Killian 1 There is no hope of doing perfect research Research can be defined as a systematic study of sources or materials with an aim

of establishing novel conclusions and facts. Research as implied by the name, can also means a re searching. This suggests a process of carrying out a search for something that has already been studied and completed in previous times. That something can either be a concept, a technology, an idea, a theorem and much more. As Griffiths puts it, There is no hope of doing perfect research. In fact, that particular saying is true for every single research work that has been carried on earth. I do agree with what Griffiths says and in this essay, I will give my supporting evidence as I refer to researches carried out. Currently, previous researches, which were widely accepted as facts, have been disapproved by modern researchers. The Big Bang Theory explains the origin of the universe. Big Bang theory stipulates that the universe emerged from nothing (Karen 1). The theory proves that the universe has an origin, and before that origin, nothing existed. This concept is widely accepted up to date. Nevertheless, many researches in recent years, are drafting hypothesis, which oppose this widely accepted theory. With reference to Big Bang, the universe has been there for 13.7 million years. Current researches done by scientists have spotted stars in the universe that date more than 13.7 million years, hence older than the universe (NOAO, Website). There can never be two individuals with the same thoughts or opinion. As their thoughts differ, their ways of perceiving things differ too. Therefore, a research work will always result from one persons point of view on a given concept. Evidently, two researchers cannot have a similar conclusion on a particular thing. A conflicting research work carried out by scientist Roger A Rydin, stipulates that the Einstein proposed general model of relativity, which was assumed by Big Bang as a base for forecasting the history of the universe was not in itself correct

Killian 2 (Roger 1). This out rightly indicates that the Big Bang theory predictions are not correct. The uncertainties that surround the Big Bang theory are still upcoming and likely to last forever. Researchers are not perfect since there have been researches conducted on the same topic which contradict themselves. Both Bernoullis principle of energy conservation and Newtons third law of motion have come up with a theory that justifies why an airplane fly in the air. The Newtons third law of motion states that there is an equal and opposite reaction for every action (Dole 143). While, the Bernoullis principle of conservation of energy states that, Faster moving air has a lower pressure and that the reverse is true (McCormick 46), this is contrary to the Newtons third law of motion. This gives aeronautical engineering Researchers a hard time while trying to decide on which law they should rely on. Research is therefore a continuous process. Many present evidences of occurrences have proven wrong numerous previous researches. If research work has been perfect, there would be no need of carrying out a research on the same work. Actually, a research is always dependent on other past conclusions as a foundation. It is therefore undeniable and evident from the above research results that it is not possible to term a research work as perfect. I therefore, strongly agree with Griffiths there is no hope of doing perfect research.

Killian 3 Works Cited Dole, Charles, and Lewis, James. Flight theory and aerodynamics: a practical guide for operational safety, USA: Wiley-IEEE, 2000. Karen, Fox. The big bang theory: what it is, where it came from, and why it works, New York: John Wiley and Sons, 2002. McCormick, Warnock, et al. Aircraft accident reconstruction and litigation, USA: Lawyers & Judges Publishing Company, 2003. Rydin, Roger. New Developments: The Big Bang in Controversy, Charlottesville: University of Virginia, 2007.