Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Contaminant
Hydrology
ELSEVIER Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 28 (1997) 327-335
Abstract
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are of environmental concern because many PAHs
are either carcinogens or potential carcinogens. Petroleum products are a major source of PAHs.
The occurrence of PAH contamination is widespread and novel treatment technologies for the
remediation of contaminated soils are necessary.
Ozone has been found to be extremely useful for the degradation of PAHs in soils. For these
compounds, the reaction with molecular ozone appears to be the more important degradation
pathway. Greater than 95% removal of phenanthrene was achieved with an ozonation time of 2.3
h at an ozone flux of 250 mg h - 1. After 4.0 h of treatment at an ozone flux of 600 mg h 1, 91% of
the pyrene was removed. We have also found that the more hydrophobic PAHs (e.g. chrysene)
react more slowly than would be expected on the basis of their reactivity with ozone, suggesting
that partitioning of the contaminant into soil organic matter may reduce the reactivity of the
compound. Even so, after 4 h of exposure to ozone, the chrysene concentration in a contaminated
Metea soil was reduced from 100 to 5 0 m g k g - t .
Ozone has been found to be readily transported through columns packed with a number of
geological materials, including Ottawa sand, Metea soil, Borden aquifer material and Wurtsmith
aquifer material. All of these geological materials exerted a limited (finite) ozone demand, i.e. the
rate of ozone degradation in soil columns is very slow after the ozone demand is met. Moisture
content was found to increase the ozone demand, most likely owing to the dissolution of gaseous
ozone into the pore water. As once the initial ozone demand is met, little degradation of ozone is
observed, it should be possible to achieve ozone penetration to a considerable distance away from
the injection well, suggesting that in-situ ozonation is a feasible means of treating uncontaminated
* Corresponding author. Tel.: + 1 517 353-8539: fax: + 1 517 355-0250; e-mail: masten@cee.msu.edu
unsaturated soils. This is substantiated by two field studies where in-situ ozonation was apparently
successful at remediating the sites. © 1997 Elsevier Science B.V.
I. Introduction
2. In-situ ozonation
biodegradation processes, since the chemical oxidants may diffuse in the aqueous
a n d / o r gaseous phase to the reaction site.
The use of gaseous ozone for in-situ chemical oxidation has significant advantages
over aqueous-based systems for the treatment of unsaturated soils. As the diffusivity of
ozone gas is much greater than that for aqueous species, the mass of ozone that one can
contact with the target contaminants is much greater than that which is possible with
dissolved oxidants. Additionally, as volatilization of the target chemical is also not
required, it can overcome mass transfer limitations associated with soil venting. In-situ
ozonation may also be used to treat the region near the water table by using sparging.
In-situ ozonation would likely be more rapid than biodegradation or soil venting
processes, thereby reducing the remediation time and, possibly, treatment costs.
Conceptually, in-situ ozonation is similar to soil venting. Vertical or horizontal
injection wells can be used to inject ozone into the subsurface. Fig. 1 illustrates how a
vertical injection well could be used to introduce ozone into unsaturated soils. Extraction
wells may, if necessary, be used to control the direction of ozone flow in the subsurface.
Horizontal wells could also be used to inject ozone. Nelson and Brown (1994) have
claimed that this technique is more effective for the introduction of ozone into
unsaturated soils than is the use of vertical wells. Horizontal wells are also advantageous
when using ozone in combination with sparging technologies. However, while horizon-
tal wells may have some advantages, it is not clear that these advantages warrant the
additional cost necessary to install such wells.
In-situ ozonation has not been widely used in the field. However, to our knowledge,
two groups have used in-situ ozonation for soil remediation. One group is a consortium
of two West Coast companies (Steffen Robertson and Kirsten Consulting Engineers and
Scientists and McCulloch Environmental Equipment Sales). This group has conducted
three field-scale soil remediation efforts using ozone. In all cases, the contaminants of
interest have been chlorinated solvents. The largest of these remediation efforts was at a
site in Carson City, NV. This site had been contaminated with tetrachlorethylene (PCE).
It was estimated that it would take 5 years to clean up this site using conventional
pump-and-treat methods. The owner, a property developer, wanted to accelerate this
Ozone
Exhaust
Generator ~'~ blower
"1
I
j,i
Injection well I Extraction well
I
..J
process, so that the site could be developed. Thirteen sparge wells and three horizontal
vapor extraction wells were installed. After initial sparging and venting with air, ozone
was used in both the sparging and soil vapor extraction wells. Samples taken after 4.5
months of operation indicated that the site had been remediated and the site is now
closed (McCulloch, W., personal communication). At a PCE contaminated site in
Colorado Springs, groundwater clean-up was achieved in 2.5 months (McCulloch, W.,
personal communication). The site was closed at the end of the third month. At a smaller
site in Cape Cod, MA groundwater clean-up was achieved in less than 2 weeks
(McCulloch, W., personal communication).
Nelson and Brown (1994) have described the use of ozone sparging to remove
trichloroethylene (TCE) and dichloroethylene (DCE) from a site in Kansas. Prior to
ozonation, air sparging was used to remove the bulk of the contaminants. Groundwater
samples collected from monitoring wells ranging from 5 to 20 ft from the injection point
indicated that in this region TCE concentrations were reduced from 54 to 100%. The
lowest level of TCE removal (14%) was seen at a sampling location 5 ft from the ozone
injection point, suggesting that preferential flow paths may have been established near to
the injection well. DCE removal efficiencies ranged from 94 to 100% (with the
exception of the nearby sampling point, where the removal was 30%).
To assess the applicability of in-situ ozonation, we have investigated the effect of soil
organic matter, soil moisture and soil texture on the ozone demand exerted by the soil,
along with the reactivity of selected PAHs with ozone in the soil and the byproducts
formed from the reaction of ozone with PAHs.
One of the major concerns with the use of in-situ ozonation has been the ability to
transport ozone any considerable distance in unsaturated soils. This stems from the fact
that numerous researchers have shown that it is difficult to transport ozone or hydrogen
peroxide in saturated soils, this observation should not be translated to the transport of
gaseous ozone in unsaturated soils. The concentrations of ozone in the gas phase are
orders of magnitude higher than that obtainable in aqueous solutions. Ozone is more
stable in the gas phase than in water. In water, OH catalyses the autodecomposition of
ozone (Langlais et al., 1991). Also, higher flow velocities can be achieved in the vadose
zone than is possible in aquifers.
We have investigated the transport of ozone in several geological materials (Day and
Masten, 1992; Day, 1994; Hsu, 1995; Cole et al., 1996). Ozonation was conducted by
passing humidified gaseous ozone through 10 cm long soil columns. Details of the
procedures used in these experiments are described by Cole et al. (1996), Hsu (1995)
and Day (1994). As shown in Fig. 2, Day (1994) found that ozone is readily transported
through columns packed with Ottawa sand and there is a rapid initial breakthrough of
ozone (within 1.5 pore volumes). However, complete breakthrough is not achieved until
nearly 5 pore volumes have been passed through the column. Work has also been
conducted with a Metea subsoil. The ozone demand exerted by the Metea subsoil is
greater than that of the Ottawa sand; breakthrough in a 10 cm column is observed in
S.J. Masten, S.H.R. Davies/Journal of Contaminant t-(vdrology 28 (1997) 327-335 331
1.2
1o
0.8
0.6
b
0.4
0.2
0.0
0 500 1000 1500
Time (sec)
Fig. 2. The effect of soil moisture content on the breakthrough curves for the ozonation of Ottawa sand. C is
the effluent ozone concentration and C O is the influent ozone concentration (O air-dried sand, • 12%
moisture content, • 37% moisture content). Ozone flow rate: 120mlmin - j . Column length: 10 cm. Column
diameter: 5.5 cm I.D.
approximately 600 pore volumes. For Borden sand, 90% ozone breakthrough is achieved
in a 30 cm column in approximately 300 pore volumes (Day, 1994). Similar results were
also obtained with Wurtsmith soil (Cole et al., 1996). As shown in Fig. 3, the ozone
demand of the Wurtsmith soil was completely satisfied within 30 min (approximately 60
pore volumes).
All the geological materials we have studied exert a limited (finite) ozone demand,
i.e. the rate of ozone degradation in soil columns is very slow after the ozone demand is
1.2
1.0
0.8 ~W--
c3 0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0 I - - - - - 7 - - [ I - -
Table 1
Geological material Energy cost/ton soil
kWh a SUS b
met (Day, 1994). Ottawa sand exerts little ozone demand (less than 0.04mg 0 3 per
gramme sand). For the Metea subsoil the ozone demand is approximately 1.4 mg 03 per
gramme soil and the ozone demand of Borden sand is approximately 2mg 03 per
gramme sand (Day, 1994). For Wurtsmith soil, the ozone demand is approximately
0.215 mg 0 3 per gramme soil at a moisture content of 6.8%. At a moisture content of
3.2% the ozone demand is approximately 0.022 mg 03 per gramme soil. As such, once
the initial ozone demand is met, little degradation of ozone is observed. Therefore, it
should be possible, in the soils we have studied, to achieve ozone penetration to a
considerable distance away from the injection well.
The costs associated with in-situ ozonation have been of significant concern to the
engineering community. The two major costs would be associated with the purchase of
the ozonation equipment and with operating and maintenance (O & M). The predominant
O & M expenses would be associated with the generation of ozone. The energy costs to
generate ozone to meet the ozone demand of an uncontaminated geological material are
as mentioned in Table 1.
These costs are small compared to typical soil remediation costs (over $100 per ton).
The ozone injection wells ought to be simple and relatively inexpensive to construct. We
expect that the principal cost associated with the remediation effort would the capital (or
rental) costs associated with the procurement of the ozone generation equipment and the
operating cost for the ozone generation equipment. Such costs are difficult to estimate,
as they are very dependent on the size of the ozone generation equipment to be used. For
water treatment, the overall cost of ozone generation for a 200 lb 03 per day plant
(excluding the cost of the contactor) was estimated in 1991 to be $US 1000 per day (i.e.
$5.00 per lb) (Langlais et al., 1991). While comparison of the cost of ozone generation
at a water treatment plant and the cost of ozone generation for subsurface remediation is
at best, very rough, our preliminary results suggest that ozone venting costs are very
likely to be competitive with the costs of other soil remediation techniques (typically
over $100 per ton).
The effect of moisture content on the degradation of ozone in soils was investigated
(Day, 1994). It was found that increasing the moisture content in Ottawa sand resulted in
an increase in the ozone-demand exerted by the soil and an increase in the time required
to achieve a constant ozone concentration in the effluent stream from the column.
Air-dried Ottawa sand had an ozone demand of 0.036 mg g ] soil, while the ozone
demand for the moist soils (12 and 37% moisture contents) were 0.048 and 0.0062 mg g -
s.J. Masten, S.H.R. Davies~Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 28 (1997) 327-335 333
soil), respectively. It is thought that this increase is due to the dissolution of gaseous
ozone into the soil pore water and the subsequent self-decomposition of ozone once it is
dissolved in the water.
Ozone reacts directly with aromatic compounds via a t,3-dipolar cyclic addition of
ozone across the double bond to yield an unstable intermediate, known as a trioxalane.
These intermediates rapidly decompose to form catechols, phenols and carboxylic adds
(Bailey, 1982). Phenol will be further oxidized by ozone to form a number of organic
acids and aldehydes (Jarret and Bermond, 1983). The PAHs are reactive with both ozone
and OH radicals (formed from the self-decomposition of ozone). As such, the remedia-
tion of soils contaminated with the PAHs has considerable promise.
Much work has been accomplished in our laboratory investigating the aqueous
decomposition products formed from the ozonation of pyrene (Yao, 1997). Numerous
products are produced, but the intermediates formed are mostly biphenyls substituted
with carboxylic acid and aldehyde functional groups. Toxicity testing using gap junction
intercellular communication as a biological endpoint has revealed that the products
formed upon the ozonation of pyrene at dosages of at least 4.5 tool of ozone per mole of
pyrene are not epigenetic toxicants to rat liver epithelial cells (Upham et al., 1994,
1995).
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are very reactive with ozone and as such,
ozone is very effective for the removal of PAHs from soils. We have studied the
degradation of pyrene, naphthalene, chrysene and phenanthrene in soils (Yao and
Masten, 1992; Day, 1994). For a soil containing 100 mg k g - 1 pyrene, 81% of removal
of pyrene could be achieved using an ozone dosage of approximately 500 mg kg-~ of
soil (Day, 1994). In this experiment the rate of disappearance of pyrene was not
measured, however, as the ozone was completely degraded within 15 min it is clear that
the rate of disappearance of pyrene was fast. We have found that in soil, very
hydrophobic PAHs (e.g. chrysene) react more slowly than would expected on the basis
of their reactivity with ozone in water (Yao and Masten, 1992). Even so, after 4 h
exposure to ozone, the chrysene concentration in contaminated Metea soil 1 was reduced
from 100 to 5 0 m g k g -~. In this soil, greater than 90% removal of pyrene and
phenanthrene could be achieved with an ozonation time of only 1 h (Yao and Masten,
1992).
In Ottawa sand, it was observed that in dry soil, approximately 65% of the
naphthalene was removed after 37 h of venting with air; this resulted in a residual
i The Metea soil contained 78.9% sand, 12.5% silt and 8.6% clay. The organic matter content of the soil
was 0.4 _+0.1%.
334 S.J. Masten, S.H.R. Dat,ies / Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 28 (1997) 327-335
6. Conclusions
Ozone has been found to be extremely effective for the degradation of PAHs in
unsaturated soils. It has also been shown that ozone can be readily transported through
columns packed with a number of geological materials, including Ottawa sand, Metea
soil, Borden aquifer material and Wurtsmith aquifer material. All of these geological
materials exerted a limited (finite) ozone demand, i.e. the rate of ozone degradation in
soil columns is very slow after the ozone demand is met. As once the initial ozone
demand is met, little degradation of ozone is observed, it should be possible to achieve
ozone penetration to a considerable distance away from the injection well, indicating the
feasibility of using ozone in situ for the treatment of uncontaminated unsaturated soils.
This is confirmed by four field studies where in-situ ozonation was apparently success-
fully used.
References
Bailey, P.S. 1982. Ozonation in Organic Chemistry, vol. 2, Nonolefinic Compounds. Academia Press, New
York, pp. 30.
Cole, D.K., Davies, S.H.R., Masten, S.J., 1996. In-Situ Ozonation for the Remediation of Soils Contaminated
with Petroleum Hydrocarbons, Proceedings of the IOA Pan American Conference: Applications and
Optimization of Ozone for Potable Water Treatment, 8-11 September 1996.
S.J. Masten, S.H.R. Davies~Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 28 (1997) 327-335 335
Day, J.E., 1994. The Effect of Moisture on the Ozonation of Pyrene in Soils, Masters Thesis, Department of
Civil and Environmental Engineering, Michigan State University, Michigan.
Day, J.E., Masten, S.J., 1992. Effect of Moisture on Removal of PAHs From Soils Using In Situ Ozonation.
Proceedings of 24th Mid-Atlantic Industrial and Hazardous Waste Conference, West Virginia University,
14-17 July 1992.
Gilbert, E., 1987. Biodegradability of ozonation products as a function of COD and DOC elimination by
example of substituted aromatic substances. Water Res. 21, 1273-1278.
Hsu, I.Y., 1995. The Use of Gaseous Ozone to Remediate Organic Contaminants in Unsaturated Soils. Ph.D.
Dissertation. Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
Hsu, I.Y., Davies, S.H.R., Masten, S.J., 1993. The Use of Ozone for the Removal of Residual Trichloroethy-
lene from Unsaturated Soils. Proceedings of the 48th Annual Purdue University Industrial Waste
Conference, 10-12 May 1993.
Jarret, M.. Bermond, A., Ducanze, C., 1983. Applicatien de la chromatographie en phase liquide h la
d6terminatien des produits form6s par ozonatien des solutiens aqueuses de ph6nol. Analusis II (4),
185-189.
Langlais, B., Reckhow, D.A., Brink, D.R., (Eds.), 1991. Ozone in Water Treatment--Application and
Engineering. Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, MI.
Luthy, R.G., Dzombak, D.A., Peters, C.A,, Roy, S.B., Ramaswami, A., Nakles, D.V., Nott, B.R., 1994.
Remediating tar-contaminated soils at manufactured gas plant sites. Environ. Sci. Technol. 28, 266A-276A.
Miller, R., 1994. Bioventing, Performance and Cost Summary. U.S. Air Force Center for Environmental
Excellence, Brooks AFB, Texas.
Nelson, C.H.. Brown, R.A., 1994. Adapting Ozonation for Soil and Groundwater Cleanup. Environmental
Engineering, a Supplement to Chemical Engineering, pp. EE20-EE24.
Upham, B., Yao, J.-J., Trosko, J.E., Masten, S.J., 1995. Determination of the Efficacy of Ozone Treatment
Systems using a Gap Junction Intercellular Communication Bioassay. Environ. Sci. Technol. 29 (10),
2923-2928.
Upham, B.L., Masten, S.J., Lockwood, B.R., Trosko, J.E., 1994. Tile Effect of Ozonation on the Non-geno-
toxicity of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons using Intercellular Communication in Rat Liver Epithelial
Cells. Fund. Appl. Toxicol. 23, 470-475.
US EPA, 1995. Workshop on Chemical Oxidation in the Vadose Zone. US EPA Edison Laboratory, IT Corp.,
Cincinnati, OH, June 14, 1995.
Yao, J.-J., Masten, S.J., 1992. Use of ozone for the oxidation of PAHs in dry soils. Proceedings of the 24th
Mid-Atlantic Industrial and Hazardous Waste Conference, 14-17 July 1992, Morgantown, WV. pp.
642-651.
Yao, J.-J., 1997. The Mechanism of the Reaction of Ozone with Pyrene and Benz[a]anthracene in Acetoni-
trile/water Mixture. Ph.D. Thesis Michigan State University, East Lansing M.I. 1997.