Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
,
Material 16L Stainless Steel
Fig 15.
Applications:
1. Liquid Iilled case Ior high dynamic pressure pulsations.
2. Suitable Ior corrosive environment.
3. All stainless steel construction.
4. Excellent load cycle stability and shock resistance.
9.5 PRESSURE TRANSMITTER SELECTION
As a means oI monitoring activity in a number oI manuIacturing Iacilities, marine
research, and general production control, a pressure transmitter will not only help
to ensure positive results; it also can be a great way oI maintaining acceptable
levels oI saIety. Here are some examples oI what a pressure transmitter is designed
to do and how it can be used in several diIIerent settings.
When it comes to the monitoring oI pressure within a Iactory setting, a pressure
transmitter helps to accomplish two speciIic goals. First, pressure instruments
monitor the amount oI pressure applied to a part oI the process that is required in
order to achieve the desired result. Since the application oI too much or too little
pressure may result in product that cannot be sold, constant real-time
measurements oI the pressurized environment is absolutely necessary.
In other manuIacturing applications, a pressure transmitter may be used to make
sure that no machinery is building up pressure that is beyond levels that are
considered saIe Ior the operators. Should a machine malIunction push the pressure
beyond acceptable levels, the pressure transmitter alerts the operator, who can take
steps to shut down the machinery and thus avert an industrial accident.
Pressure transmitters perIorm the important job oI making sure machinery and
equipment is working properly, as well as providing warning when pressures are
building to unsaIe levels.
The pressure transmitter is selected on the basis oI the maximum system pressure.
For our particular application, the system maximum pressure is 100 bar i.e. around
1410 psi.
Fig 16. Pressure Transmitter
10. SAFETY VALVE
O Pressure relieI valves are used as a saIety device to protect equipment
Irom over-pressure occurrences in any Iluid process. Loss oI heating
and cooling, mechanical Iailure oI valves, and poor draining and
venting are some oI the common causes oI overpressure.
O The relieving system depends on the process at hand; pressure relieI
valves either bypass a Iluid to an auxiliary passage or open a port to
relieve the pressure to atmosphere. Some areas oI common usage
include reaction vessels and storage tanks.
O In our application, we have used a Spring Loaded Pressure Release
Valve as the SaIety Valve.
O The spring is adjusted Ior a speciIic pressure setting. As long as the
system pressure is below the spring tension, the bypass remains close.
O When the system pressure increases, the hydraulic Iluid Ilows against
the opposing spring tension and opens the bypass valve.
O Hence, the pressure oI the system drops, thereby protecting the system
Irom the dangerous aItermath oI excess pressure in the system.
11. SUCTION FILTER
O This is one oI the most important parts oI the entire system. This is the
suction line Iilter.
O When dealing with the suction Iilters Ior pumps, one has to be careIul about
the exposure oI the Iilter to Iree air.
O In case the Iilter is exposed to air, and the air manages to get into the suction
line, it will leads to cavitation.
O Cavitation is a phenomenon wherein, the entrapped air leads to the
Iormation oI bubbles. These bubbles burst upon contact with the pump parts
and this bursting oI the bubbles causes an immediate pressuer gradientin the
surrounding region.
O Water Irom the surrounding high pressure region rushes in to Iill into the
low pressure area created.
O This sudden Ilow oI high pressure liquid leads to the withering oI the metal
parts and reduce the liIe oI the pump.
O In order to avoid cavitation, the air needs to be prevented Irom entering the
suction line.
O This is done by using a completely submerged Iilter.
O But in case oI normally submerged Iilters the chances oI air entering the line
are not completely eliminated. In case, due to any reason, the position oI the
Iilter changes, the chances oI exposure to air increases.
O To counter this particular problem, we needed to alter the existing available
Iilters designs.
O Hence we came up with a new design.
11.1 IMPROVED DESIGN
O The principle employed is explained as Iollows.
Fig 17. Filter Assembly
11.1.1 CONSTRUCTION
O The pump suction line is Iitted at the lowermost port. Let us call this port
A`.
O A perpendicular port admits water into the Iilter. Let us call this port B`.
O The Iilter is engulIed in a glass cover. Hence, when the water is admitted
into the Iilter, the entire region surrounded by the glass is Iilled with water.
O Another port is provided at the top oI the cover. Let us call this port C`.
O It allows the water to Ilow out through it. This arrangement ensures that no
air is preset in the glass entrapped region.
O The Iilter inside the cover is nothing but a Iilter oI mesh grade oI about 120
microns. It is cylindrical in shape.
11.1. WORKING
O The water enters the arrangement through port B` and Ilows out
through port C`.
O This ensures that there is no air inside the glass covered region.
O The water now passes through the Iilter mesh and the waste particles
are restrained outside the Iilter cylinder.
O Thus, Iiltered water enters through port A` to the pump.
11.1. FILTER COMPONENTS
Fig 18. Filter Cap
Fig 19. Cover Cap
Fig 0. Filter
Fig 1. Glass Shell
Fig . Cover end Cap
Fig . Cover Stud
1. BASE PLATE
O The entire assembly is to be mounted on a base plate.
O The base plate houses the pump and the motor assembly.
O Since both the pump and the motor are not Iabricated products, the mounting
bolt positions oI both were approximated Irom the respective manuals.
O Accordingly a base plate was Iabricated.
O The base also accommodates the control box that is mounted right next to
the motor as can be seen in the Iinal assembly images.
Fig . Base Plate
COST SHEET - FILTER
S
NO
ITEM QTY M O C MATERIAL
COST / KG
WT
(KG)
CONVERSION
COST (Rs)
TOTAL
UNIT
COST
1. UPPER
BODY
COVER
1 ALUMINIUM 300 100 200
. FILTER
CAP
1 FIBRE PLASTIC BO BO BO 150
. FILTER 1 FIBRE PLASTIC BO BO BO 800
. GLASS
COVER
1 ACRYLIC BOUGHT
OUT(BO)
BO BOUGHT OUT 300
5. LOWER
BODY
COVER
1 ALUMINIUM 300 105 300
6. STUD 4 STAINLESS
STEEL
240 30 100
7. AIR
PLUG
1 BRASS BOUGHT
OUT
BO BOUGHT OUT 700
TOTAL COST 550/-
1. VARIOUS SYSTEM CONFIGURATIONS
1.1 MANUAL APPROACH
O The pump is shown to be driven by a prime mover, in this case a 3 phase
induction motor.
Fig 5. Manual Layout
O The pump takes in the working Iluid, water in this case, through the low
pressure suction line, Irom the reservoir.
O Due to the pumping action, the water is pressurized and is discharged
through the high pressure discharge line.
O At this point the bypass throttle valve and the ball valve at the end oI the
pressure vessel are kept Iully open.
O The water is allowed to return back to the reservoir completing the loop,
since the ball valve is open.
O The above procedure will help remove the air Irom the system, so as not to
cause any cavitation.
O AIter all the air is removed, and crystal water starts Ilowing back in the
reservoir, the ball valve is to be closed completely.
O Under this scenario, the path oI least resistance to the in Ilowing water is
through the bypass, since the bypass throttle valve is Iully open.
O The system is yet not pressurized.
O The bypass throttle valve is now manually throttled till the desired pressure
is reached.
O As soon as the operator sees the desired pressure at the pressure gauge, he
manually shuts off the pump by cutting oII the supply to the motor.
O This process, since it involves manual operation and coordination, is unsaIe
and not precise.
O II due to some reason, the operator is late to cut oII the supply, the pressure
in the line will exceed the saIe values and in the worst case scenario, the
pressure vessel becomes prone to burst. This will lead to disastrous eIIects.
The above considerations lead to realizing the need to automate the system.
The details regarding that are mentioned as Iollows.
1. AUTOMATED APPROACH
O The basic setup remains more or less the same as that explained above.
O When the system is to be automated, the basic logic that is to be worked is
that the responsibility oI the operator to shut oII the supply is to be
withdrawn.
O To accomplish this, a pressure switch or a pressure transmitter is used.
O Upon conducting the initial tests on the automated system using the pressure
transmitter, it was realized that when the system was dead ended, there
was sudden surge of pressure beyond the required system pressure.
O The surge so produced was two to three times the system pressure.
O Now, since this was the conIiguration was to be delivered; the problem oI
surge was needed to be dealt with.
O This problem was addressed by eliminating the dead end. Instead a
bypass with manual throttling was provided.
O Initially the bypass throttle valve and the ball valve at the vessel exit are
open until a clear stream oI water exits Irom the vessel.
O When all the air is removed, the ball valve is completely closed but the
bypass valve was open.
O Now the bypass valve is slowly closed, thereby pressuring the vessel and the
corresponding line up to the required the required pressure.
O Thus a bypass is shown inclusive in both the conIigurations.
1..1 PRESSURE SWITCH
O A pressure switch uses a mechanical spring, which compresses due to the
incoming pressure, thereby physically cutting oII the supply.
Fig 6. Automated Layout with Pressure Switch
O It is Iitted in the discharge line.
O The desired pressure is adjusted against the spring resistance. The moment
the desired pressure overpowers the spring stiIIness, the spring compresses,
thereby shutting oI the supply to the motor. An elaborate detailing is given
in the Iollowing pages.
O The pressure switch is an electro-mechanical component.
1.. PRESSURE TRANSMITTER
O Another approach used is the pressure transmitter.
O Here, both illustrations have been shown;
a) Dead Ended b) Bypass
Fig 7. Automated Layout with Pressure Transmitter (Dead Ended)
O In the above case, when the ball valve is closed, the pressure shoots up
irrationally.
O This is the pressure surge observed in the line.
O To overcome this diIIiculty, a bypass line was introduced with a manual
throttle.
O As seen in the Iigure below, when the ball valve is closed the bypass throttle
valve is adjusted slowly so that the line pressure increases gradually and
avoids the surge.
O The pressure transmitter will cut oII the motor supply when the pressure
reaches the system pressure.
Fig 8. Automated Layout with Pressure Transmitter (Bypass)
O In this case the desired pressure is Ied into the digital input oI the device.
When the desired pressure is reached, the transmitter relays the command to
the receiver at the motor end, thereby shutting oII the supply.
O The pressure transmitter is completely an electronic component.
1. CONTROL BOX
O Control Box Iorms the brain` oI the automated system.
O It encompasses the pressure transmitter and the motor.
O The signal Irom the pressure transmitter is Ied into the control box,
which is then transIerred to the relay.
O The pressure transmitter produces the signal when the system pressure
reaches the set value.
O The signal, so produced is either a diIIerential voltage or current.
O Based on this signal, the relay either cuts oII the supply to the motor
or connects the circuit to the motor.
15. COST SHEET
15.1 COST TO COMPANY
SR NO.
ITEM QUANTITY UNIT COST (Rs.)
1 PUMP 1 24,600
2 MOTOR 1 12,000
3 FILTER 1 1,500
4 BASE PLATE 1 1,500
5 SAFETY VALVE 1 1,800
6 INLET HOSE 1 1,000
7 DELIVERY HOSE 1 1,000
8 PRESSURE GAUGE 1 700
9 PRESSURE
TRANSMITTER
1 8,000
10 CONTROL BOX 1 9,000
11 NEEDLE VALVE 2 300
COST TO COMPANY 61,00/-
15. OVERHEAD COST
S NO OPERATION COST (Rs)
1. SYSTEM ASSEMBLY 1000
2. PAINTING 500
3. MISCELLENEOUS 750
OVERHEAD COST 50/-
TOTAL COST RS 6,650/-
16. RESULT TABLE
16.1 PRESSURE SWITCH
TRIAL NUMBER
SET PRESSURE
(IN BAR)
ATTAINED VALUE
(IN BAR)
1.
5
5
2.
10
12
3.
15
15
4.
20
22
5.
25
27
6.
30
31
7.
35
37
8.
40
42
9.
45
47
10.
50
52
16. PRESSURE TRANMITTER
TRIAL
NUMBER
SET PRESSURE
(IN BAR)
ATTAINED VALUE
(IN BAR)
CORRECTED
VALUE
(IN BAR)
1.
5
15
7
2.
10
30
14
3.
15
50
28
4.
20
75
40
5.
25
90
50
6.
30
105
70
7.
35
120
85
8.
40
130
90
9.
45
140
95
10.
50
150
100
17. RESULT GRAPHS
17.1 PRESSURE SWITCH
H. Pressure Switch Result
0
10
20
30
40
30
60
1 2 3 4 3 6 7 8 9 10
k
L
S
S
U
k
L
I
N
8
A
k
MAkIMUM kLSSUkL DLVIA1ICN
SL1 8LSSu8L (8A8)
A11AlnLu vALuL (8A8)
17. PRESSURE TRANMITTER
I. Pressure Transmitter Result
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
1 2 3 4 3 6 7 8 9 10
k
L
S
S
U
k
L
I
N
8
A
k
MAkIMUM kLSSUkL DLVIA1ICN
SL1 8LSSu8L (8A8)
A11AlnLu vALuL (8A8)
CC88LC1Lu vALuL (8A8)
18. OBSERVATIONS
O It was observed during the testing oI the dead ended system that in case oI
the pressure transmitter, there was a surge in the line.
O The surge however, is not very much evident in case oI a pressure switch.
O The system pressure would shoot up irrationally in case oI the pressure
transmitter. This value was way above the desired or the set` value.
O The cause oI the pressure surge was not known at the time and hence was
required to be Iound out.
O The reason Ior the surge in the line was narrowed down to the trip time delay
oI the pressure transmitter.
O Every measuring instrument or any instrument Ior that matter has an
inherent system response time or the trip time` delay.
O Thus, the delay time or the response time oI the instrument was adjusted or
reduced to zero. This was the lowest it could go as negative delay time could
not be set Ior the system.
O But it was observed that even upon adjusting the delay time oI the device to
the minimum i.e. zero, the surge in the line was not eliminated, however it
was diminished to a great extent.
O Since the system needed to be dispatched, the problem was surge was
countered by introducing a bypass throttle in the line. The details oI this
conIiguration are already above.
O The result table and the graphs supporting these Iindings are as displayed
above.
O The result table shows the readings oI both before and after the adjustment
oI the trip time delay oI the pressure transmitter.
O Although no such surges were encountered in the pressure switches, a major
drawback oI the pressure switches was that whenever the maximum system
pressure requirement was to be changed, it needed to be done manually by
adjusting the spring tension. As such its use becomes very cumbersome.
19. FUTURE SCOPE
O The current problem oI surge was eliminated by introducing a manual
bypass throttle. Since this manual involvement also needs to be eradicated,
the bypass throttling is considered to be motorized and linked to the control
box. Hence, when the ball valve will be completely closed, a signal will be
relayed to the bypass throttle motor and it will rotate the throttle by the
required amount.
O The Pressure Transmitter suIIers Irom the problem oI pressure surge in the
system, although it is a digital instrument and is more accurate than the
pressure switch.
O Pressure switches show no surges in the line. Although the problem with the
pressure switches is that the spring tension needs to be manually adjusted
every time the system maximum pressure requirement changes. Also,
pressure switch is an analog instrument.
O Hence, to counter this problem it would be ideal to put together the positive
aspects oI both the instruments in one.
O Currently, along with the initiative and the support oI the company, we are
trying to digitize the pressure switch.
O The pressure transmitter is solely an electronic device while the pressure
switch is an electromechanical device.
O Hence, the mechanical output oI the pressure needs to digitized and a
mechanism needs to be put in place that will change the spring tension
automatically upon change in the system pressure requirement.
O The work on this is underway in the company as part oI the R&D, in order to
increase the saIety, productivity and reliability oI the system.
0. FINAL ASSEMBLY
Fig . DELIEVERY LINE PRESSURE GAUGE MOUNT
Fig . DELIEVERY LINE PRESURE TRANSMITTER MOUNT
Fig . DELIEVERY LINE SAFETY VALVE
Fig 5. COMPLETE DELIEVERY LINE MOUNTINGS
Fig 6. FRONT VIEW OF THE ASSEMBLY
Fig 7. TOP VIEW OF THE ASSEMBLY
1. BIBLIOGRAPHY
O KLM Technology Group Practical Engineering Guidelines Ior Processing
Plant Solutions.
O Hydrostatic Pressure Testing` Corr Tech Inc
O Energy EIIiciency Guide Ior Industry in Asia UNEP 2006
O Pressure Test SaIety Department oI Chemical Engineering, Health and
SaIety Executive
O General Purpose Pressure Transmitters Datasheet WIKA Instruments
O Technical Manual LHP Motors