Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
medtechinsider.com
medtechinsider.de
medtechinsider.com
The Magazine for Medical Product Design & Manufacturing
OFFICIAL SPONSOR
emdt.co.uk
February 2011
Cables,
Connectors and
Wires Update
page 40
Enabling
Automation
pages 32 and 38
New Frontiers in
Neuromodulation
page 22
Advances in Silicone
Surface Treatments
page 15
Accelerating Ultrasound
Development
page 42
1 EMDT1102 1 1/28/11 8:07:10 AM
There are many ways to export your e|ectro-medica| equipment to North America. P|ay it safe right from the start with the certification mark from
CSA Internationa|. For more than 90 years, we have deve|oped safety standards for the North American market and have tested and certihed products.
The CSA Internationa| g|oba| network provides you with |oca| qua|ified testing and certification experts who wi|| work through the entire process
together with you.
For further info go to www.csa-europe.org
Te|.: +31 26 356 3915
E-Mai|: cert.sa|es@csa-internationa|.org
WELL GET YOU
TO NORTH AMERICA.
THE SAFER WAY.
2 EMDT1102 2 1/28/11 8:07:19 AM
emdt.co.uk European Medical Device Technology February 2011 | 3
CONTENTS
February 2011
Volume 2 Number 2
FEATURES
MATERIALS
15 Advances in Silicone
Surface Treatments
Dispersions that form
a covalent bond with
an elastomer silicone
substrate can prevent
uncontrolled material
migration.
M. Lindberg
MANUFACTURING
18 Ultrasonic Welding from
Pilot to Production
If your proposed
production process will
involve ultrasonic welding
technology, its advisable
to adopt a collaborative
approach with an expert
in the field early in the
design stage.
M. Frost and G. Forward
32 The Rise of the Robots
Automation can help
medtech manufacturers
remain competitive in a
global economy whilst
ensuring consistent
compliance with rigorous
quality standards.
M. Wilson and D. Bradford
DESIGN
22 Advanced Ceramics Help
Open New Frontiers in
Neuromodulation
By enabling the design of
devices that communicate
via ultrasound, advanced
ceramic materials are
contributing to advances
in the development
of implantable pulse
generators.
J. Anatalek and P. Manison
26 The First Million Bucks
Medical device
companies spend around
1 million euros at the
front end of every device
development project.
Some spend it better than
others.
D. Edwards
30 Understanding
Superconductivity
Research in
high-temperature
superconductivity may
lead to more-affordable
MRI scanners.
P. Steffens
COLUMNS
REGULATIONS
AND STANDARDS
12 The Notified Body
Consultation
Procedure: Part 2
This article covers aspects
of the notified body
consultaion process itself,
required documentation
and fees.
M.E. Donawa
FIVE MINUTE
INTERVIEW
46 Rosanna Tarricone,
European Health Technology
Institute for Socio-
Economic Research
Tarricone stresses the
importance of quality in
technological innovation
as well as in life.
REGULARS
6 Online Contents
7 A Note from the Editor
8 NewsTrendsAnalysis
10 Breakthroughs
45 Advertiser Index
38 Engineering Insight:
Motion Control in
Automation
40 Spotlight: Cables,
Connectors and Wires
42 First Look
43 In Focus:
Contract Services
44 In Focus: Moulding
MARKETPLACE
SPECIAL
SECTION
BIOMEDEVICE EUROPE
SHOW PREVIEW
34 Introduction
35 Product Preview
22
Cover materials courtesy of Fischer
Connectors, Saint-Prex, Switzerland.
Cover Photography:
Stephen Hughes Photography
e-mail: sh.photography@btconnect.com
40
3 EMDT1102 3 1/28/11 8:08:45 AM
4 | February 2011 European Medical Device Technology emdt.co.uk
European Medical Device Technology is published eight times a year in addition to the annual Source Book by UBM Canon,
11444 W. Olympic Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90064-1549, USA; Tel: +1 310 445 4200, Fax: +1 310 445 4299
SUBSCRIPTIONS: European Medical Device Technology is free to qualied readers. Register online at www.emdt.co.uk or
contact our subscriber services department at P.O. Box 47461, Plymouth, MN 55447, USA, tel. +1 800 869 6882, fax +1 866
658 6156, e-mail: emdt@kmpsgroup.com. Basic annual subscription price for nonqualied readers is US $150/135/UK85.
CHANGE OF ADDRESS: Please write the P.O. Box above or e-mail: emdt@kmpsgroup.com. If corresponding by physical mail,
provide your old mailing label as well as your new address. Allow six to eight weeks for change.
The Publisher endeavours to collect and include complete, correct and current information in European Medical Device
Technology, but does not warrant that any or all of such information is complete, correct or current. The Publisher does not
assume, and hereby disclaims, any liability to any person or entity for any loss or damage caused by errors or omissions of
any kind, whether resulting from negligence, accident or any other cause. If you do notice any error, we would appreciate if
you would bring such error to our attention.
EMDT does not verify any claims or other information appearing in the advertisements contained in the publication, and
cannot take any responsibility for any losses or other damages incurred by readers in reliance on such content.
MANUSCRIPTS: All submissions will be handled with reasonable care, but the Publisher assumes no responsibility for safety
of artwork, photographs, or manuscripts. Every precaution is taken to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher cannot accept
responsibility for the accuracy of information supplied herein or for any opinion expressed.
Copyright 2011, UBM Canon, All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any
form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including by photocopy, recording, or information storage and retrieval system,
without permission in writing from the Publisher. Authorisation to photocopy items for internal or personal use, or the internal or
personal use of specic clients, is granted by UBM Canon for libraries and other users in accordance with the provisions of the
Copyright, Designs and Patents Act (UK) 1988 or under the terms of a licence issued by the Copyright
Licensing Agency, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W1P 0LP, UK. ISSN: 2152-3649
UBM Canon
Bockenheimer Landstrasse 17/19
60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Tel: +49 69 7104 554 67 Fax: +49 69 7104 554 50
Corporate Headquarters
UBM Canon, 11444 W. Olympic Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90064-1549, USA
Tel: +1 310 445 4200 Fax: +1 310 445 4299
Executive Ofcers
Departmental Staff
North American Sales
International Sales Director, North America
Helene Beck
helene.beck@ubm.com
Tel: +1 732 970 8960
To Order Reprints
Foster Printing Service
Tel: +1 866 879 9144 sales@fosterprinting.com
For List Rentals
Statlistics Tel: +1 203 788 8700
For Electronic Lists: t.hassan@statlistics.com
For Postal Lists: j.felling@statlistics.com
Chief Executive Ofcer Paul Miller
Senior CIO David Michael
Chief Financial Ofcer Fred Gysi
Senior Vice President, Events Division Kevin OKeefe
Vice President, Production Operations Roger Burg
Vice President, Digital Media Jason Brown
Vice President/Executive Director Steve Corrick
Vice President, People & Culture Harris Grayman
Director of Content Rich Nass
rich.nass@ubm.com
Editor in Chief Norbert Sparrow
norbert.sparrow@ubm.com
Managing Editor Brian Buntz
brian.buntz@ubm.com
Associate Editor Yvonne Klpping
yvonne.kloepping@ubm.com
Art Director Marco Aguilera
Associate Art Directors Tim Burns,
Jenny Field, Laura Pappada, Hector Torres
Publications Production Manager
Martin Schneggenburger
Production Coordinator Oliver Calonzo
Circulation Director Sandra Martin
Circulation Manager Jason Yee
Senior Production Artists Jeff Polman, Derric Treece
Production Artists William Baughman,
Lucia Corona, Ricardo Esparza, Hector Mercado
European Sales
Account Manager Hermann Jordi
Austria and Switzerland
hermann.jordi@jordipublipress.ch
Tel: +41 32 666 3090
Account Manager Matthias Gasser
France
matthias.gasser@jordipublipress.ch
Tel: +41 32 666 3090
Account Manager Laura Polidori
Italy
laura.polidori@jordipublipress.ch
Tel: +39 0 8617 37255
Account Managers Victoria and Norbert Hufmann
Germany and Eastern Europe
sales@hufmann.info
Tel: +49 9119 397 6443
Account Managers Jason Moss, James Meire
UK, Ireland, Benelux and Scandinavia
jason.moss@ubm.com
Tel: +44 1737 210 746
james.meire@ubm.com
Tel: +44 1622 661 363
Editorial
www.masterbond.com main@masterbond.com
154 Hobart St., Hackensack, NJ 07601
Tel: 201-343-8983 Fax: 201-343-2132
PROMPT.
Fast, room-temperature cures - handling time
10-15 minutes for many applications Resists
sterilants and solvents Rigid, high strength bonds
to similar and dissimilar substrates Superior
electrical insulation properties Exceptionally low
shrinkage Biocompatible as per USP Class VI
testing Conforms to Title 21, FDA Chapter 1,
Sections 175.105 and 175.300 Easy application,
low viscosity Convenient packaging
MASTER BOND EP41S MED
Prompt Technical Assistance - We Solve Problems
FAST CURING EPOXY ADHESIVE/SEALANT
Meets USP Class VI Requirements - Increases Productivity
4 EMDT1102 4 1/28/11 8:10:01 AM
EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD
emdt.co.uk European Medical Device Technology February 2011 | 5
The Editorial Advisory Board of European Medical Device Technology is a distinguished group of specialists
representing various facets of medical device and diagnostics design and manufacturing. Members of the
board review manuscripts, suggest subject matter pertinent to the profession and answer questions when
they arise.
K. Al-Lamee
Managing Director, Aterius Ltd; and
Director, KAL Biomaterials Consulting,
Leeds, UK
S. Dunkerton
Director, HealthTech and Medicines
Knowledge Transfer Network; and
Business Manager, Processes, TWI Ltd,
Great Abington, Cambridge, UK
P. Galavotti
Consultant, Nexion srl,
Mirandola (Modena), Italy
R. Gray
VP Quality and Regulatory,
Donawa Lifescience Consulting,
Rome, Italy
O. Grndahl Hansen
General Manager, PVC Information
Council,
Copenhagen, Denmark
R. Hall
Medical Packaging Consultant,
Shannon, Co. Clare, Ireland
D. Hill
Design Manager, Rocket Medical plc,
Washington, Tyne-and-Wear, UK
D. Hodgins
Managing Director, European Technology
for Business Ltd,
Codicote, UK
C.J. Kirkpatrick
Director, Institute of Pathology,
Johannes Gutenberg University,
Mainz, Germany
U. Kleinkes
Managing Director, IVAM,
Microtechnology Network,
Dortmund, Germany
M.B. Leahey
Executive Director, Medical Device
Manufacturers Association,
Washington, District of Columbia, USA
S. Loznen
Chief Engineer, Electronics and
Telematics Laboratory, Standards
Institution of Israel,
Tel Aviv, Israel
C. Mason
Regenerative Medicine Processing
Unit, Advanced Centre for Biochemical
Engineering, University College,
London, UK
C. Mathews
Director, Team Consulting Ltd,
Ickleton, Cambridge, UK
R. Moore
Manager, Nanomedicine and
Life Sciences, The Institute of
Nanotechnology,
Stirling, UK
W.A. Morton
President, Medical Device Consultants
Inc.,
Attleboro, Massachusetts, USA
A. Schneider
Group Manager, Biomedical Competence
Centres, Fraunhofer IBMT Institute for
Biomedical Engineering,
Sulzbach, Germany
Sulzbach, Germany
S. Sorrel
President, MedPass International,
Paris, France
M. Tavakoli
Consultant and Technology Manager; and
Programme Manager HealthTech and
Medicines Knowledge Transfer Network,
TWI Ltd,
Great Abington, Cambridge, UK
J. Vienken
Vice President Biosciences, Dept.
International Marketing and Medicine,
Fresenius Medical Care,
Bad Homburg, Germany
D.F. Williams
Emeritus Professor, University of
Liverpool, UK, and Partner, Morgan &
Masterson,
Brussels, Belgium
L. Woo
Distinguished Scientist Emeritus, Baxter
Healthcare Corp., and Founder, LWoo
Associates LLC,
Libertyville, Illinois, USA
J.A. Woolston
Director, Astwood Projects,
Redditch, UK
Meeting place for medical technologies
Cekj_[h"Im_jp[hbWdZ
CWo&)
hZ
&,
j^
"
(&''
>c[dgbVi^dc/lll#bZY^h^Vbh#X]
5 EMDT1102 5 1/28/11 8:11:46 AM
6 | February 2011 European Medical Device Technology emdt.co.uk
ONLINE CONTENTS
CURRENTLY ON
VIEW AT
emdt.co.uk
New Generation of
Hexapods Deliver
Submicron Resolution
The latest generation of
parallel kinematic positioning
systems known as hexapods
offer an array of advantages
for robotic positional devices
that require precision on the
micron and nanometre level.
Features of the hexapods
include enhanced stability and
reliability, increased flexibility
and improved dynamic
behaviour compared with
older positioning systems.
In addition, they enable the use of high-resolution servo-driven
motors and piezoelectric actuators, freely definable virtual pivot
points and simplified HMI and simulation. The positioning systems
are expected to streamline applications in manufacturing, testing,
bioresearch and medical environments.
Read more about the technology at www.emdt.co.uk/article/
hexapods.
Simplifying IEC 62304 Compliance for Developers
Medical devices have become increasingly sophisticated, often
employing software-controlled applications whose failure to
function correctly could result in death or serious injury to the
patient treated by them. Many of the medical device faults stem
from product upgrades.
An analysis of 3140
medical device recalls
conducted between 1992
and 1998 by US FDA
reveals that 242 of them
are attributable to soft-
ware failures. Of those,
79% were caused by software defects introduced after upgrades.
Many companies are now changing their approach to improve
software processes and are adopting IEC 62304, a standard for
the design of medical products recently endorsed by the European
Union and the United States.
You can learn more about how to achieve compliance by going to
www.emdt.co.uk/article/iec-62304-compliance.
Scan Me By scanning
this QR code with your
smartphone, you can
navigate directly to a
web page where you can
read these and other
web-exclusive articles
PRECISION METAL
TUBULAR FABRICATIONS
Ask for Unimeds
expert advice and
services in
r tube
r drilling
r reducing
r coatings
r assembly
r prototyping
for your demanding
medical and laboratory
instrument applications
Unimed SA
Rue Grand-Pr 10
CH-1002 Lausanne Tl.: ++ 41 21 624 21 51
Suisse Switzerland Fax: ++ 41 21 624 53 52
http: www.unimed.ch e-mail:info@unimed.ch
6 EMDT1102 6 1/28/11 8:13:53 AM
emdt.co.uk European Medical Device Technology February 2011 | 7
A NOTE FROM THE EDITOR
Norbert Sparrow
norbert.sparrow@ubm.com
NOW THAT WE HAVE LANDED squarely
in 2011, I thought it might be an opportune
moment to put together a to-do list for
Europes medtech community. Here goes.
Learn Mandarin. Not content with being
the worlds factory, China is ramping up
innovation initiatives. The Medical Technol-
ogy Innovation Scorecard published by PwC
earlier this year forecasts a steady decline in medtech innovation in
developed economies. Meanwhile, China forges ahead. According
to PwC analysts, China will reach near parity with the developed
nations of Europe by 2020. Thats right in less than 10 years!
Moreover, in addition to benefiting from a 15 billion healthcare
stimulus, Chinese medtech companies are venturing abroad in
record numbers. According to a survey of medtech professionals
conducted by the Emergo Group, 83.8% of Asian firms [surveyed]
intend to enter international markets for the first time [in 2011].
Repeat after me: ren shi ni hen gao xing.
Get smarter. Until now, healthcare apps for smartphones have
tended to target fitness fanatics and users seeking to monitor
general health conditions. According to Berlin-based research2guid-
ance, the mobile health apps market is about to undergo a sea
change, as traditional healthcare industry players develop apps for
the chronically ill. Consider the technologys ever-evolving sophis-
tication connecting with a target market of more than 2 billion
patients suffering from a chronic diseasecan you hear me now?
Remember: a hospice is not a home. In about 20 years, one out
of every three people in Europe will be older than 65, and not one
of them will want to spend any part of his or her golden years in an
assisted-living facility. Companies that develop cost-effective tech-
nologies to foster ambient assisted living arrangements will prosper.
Practice frugal engineering. Back in August, I wrote that frugal
engineering will save the world on our medtechinsider blog. The
impetus for that messianic moment was an article titled, The
Importance of Frugal Engineering (www.medtechinsider.com/
archives/16876). The basic idea is that emerging markets dont
need stripped-down versions of wasteful first-world products
frugal engineering seeks to avoid needless costs in the first place.
GE Healthcare is the medtech poster child for this movement. The
company developed a low-cost handheld ultrasound scanner by
incorporating frugal engineering lessons learned in its Indian medi-
cal research and development lab.
Dont follow leaders . . . watch your parking meters. The final
to-do item, courtesy the bard of Minnesota, has nothing to do with
medical technologyat least not in any linear kind of waybut it
is darn good advice that I like to share at every opportunity.
I Was Just Thinking
7 EMDT1102 7 2/2/11 1:30:34 PM
NEWSTRENDSANALYSIS
8 | February 2011 European Medical Device Technology emdt.co.uk
An international consortium led by
researchers at the Universit Bocconi
(Milan; www.unibocconi.eu) has received a
US$240,000 grant from the US-based Insti-
tute for Health Technology Studies (InHealth;
Washington, DC; www.inhealth.org) to
assess the effects of hip replacement therapy
(HRT) on the employment and retirement
decisions of older adults. This is the first time
that InHealth, a nonprofit organisation sup-
porting research on the social and economic
effects of medical technology, has awarded a
grant to an academic institution outside the
United States.
Ruben Mujica-Mota, PhD, a senior
research fellow at the Centre for Research
in Healthcare Management at the Univer-
sit Bocconi, is the lead investigator for the
study. (The University of York in the United
Kingdom and Johns Hopkins University
School of Public Health in Baltimore, MD,
USA, are also part of the consortium.)
University researchers in partnership with
the European Health Technology Institute for
Socio-Economic Research (Brussels, www.
together4healthinnovation.eu), which formed
the consortium, have been studying the socio-
economic and health effects of orthopaedic
devices, says Mujica-Mota. Resources were
limited, however. The InHealth grant affords
Mujica-Mota and his partners with the
means to broaden the scope of the study. It
provides us with an opportunity to refine our
research [and apply it to] wider economic
opportunities. Even during the grant applica-
tion process, reviewer insights helped us to
fine-tune our ideas, he adds.
Hip replacement has been shown to
improve quality of life by restoring physical
mobility and reducing pain. However, there
is evidence that a substantial number of
patients who might benefit from the proce-
dure do not receive it, according to InHealth.
Currently, between 200,000 and 300,000 hip
replacement procedures are performed in the
United States each year. But in the 2002 US
Health and Retirement Study, nearly 50% of
retired respondents ages 55 to 64 reported
arthritis and other musculoskeletal condi-
tions as the most significant reasons they
could no longer work.
Early retirement triggered by such condi-
tions is a contributing factor to the current
financial crises of Europes pension systems
and of the US Social Security trust fund.
InHealths grant will help assess the impact
of reduced disabilities made possible by hip
replacements on public and private retire-
ment funds.
The 12-month study undertaken by the
consortium can be broken down into two
parts, says Mujica-Mota. We are consult-
ing available literature to determine what
is known about HRT use factors and their
effect on health and employment status, he
explains. The second part will study the use
of HRT in adults 50 and older in the United
States, the United Kingdom and continental
Europe. Data sources for the study will
include the English Longitudinal Study of
Ageing; the Survey of Health, Ageing, and
Retirement in Europe; and the US Health
and Retirement Study.
By comparing patients who received a
hip replacement with those who did not,
researchers will estimate the impact of hip
replacement on national pension and social
security systems, and the potential outcome
of financial incentivessuch as tax breaks
that could encourage working adults to delay
retirement. That, of course, is a hot-button
topic in many countries, and I asked Mujica-
Mota if he had any qualms about how the
mass media might filter this research.
Our study will not be able to shed light
on whether it is optimal or fair from soci-
etys point of view to implement reforms
to social security and pension systems,
says Mujica-Mota. It will, however, seek
to provide an estimate of the economic
benefit that a particular group in society
will derive from access to HRT in the con-
text of pension reforms. It would provide
policy makers with guidance on the extent
to which it would be beneficial for a seg-
ment of the population to couple policy
reform with increased access to healthcare
and the potential benefit to the public
purse, notes Mujica-Mota.
Norbert Sparrow
Consortium Studies Socio-Economic
Impact of Hip Replacement Therapy
Miniaturisation continues to be a driver
in medical technology. And as devices
get smaller, the parts that make up the
devicesand that make them workhave
to shrink accordingly. Enter Freudenberg
engineers, who claim to have developed
and produced the worlds smallest elasto-
mer sealing ring.
The so-called Simmerring can seal shafts
measuring a scant 1 mm in diameter that
achieve rotation speeds up to 10,000 rpm.
The smallest details of this microseal are a
few hundredths
of a millimetre.
Prototypes of the seal have completed
test runs of more than 5000 hours under
operating loads without any visible signs
of wear. The seals will be used inside
miniature devices equipped with com-
plex electronic and mechanical systems.
Pumps in diagnostic systems that require
microseals to function properly are
among the medical applications.
N.S.
Freudenberg Manufactures
Worlds Smallest Seal
8 EMDT1102 8 1/28/11 8:15:41 AM
emdt.co.uk European Medical Device Technology February 2011 | 9
Medtech Survey Sees Rosy Outlook for 2011
Expansion into new markets, rising sales
figures and salaries and stepped-up hiring
are among the very positive forecasts
of the 2011 Medical Device Industry
Outlook, an annual survey conducted by
international consultancy Emergo Group.
Here are some highlights of the study; the
full results can be downloaded at www.
emergogroup.com/industry-survey.
International sales increased in 2010 for 0
just over half of the companies partici-
pating in the survey. A little more than
50% of North American and European
companies reported growth; 63% of
Asian survey participants reported
increases.
More than three-quarters of all respon- 0
dents expect overall sales to increase
in 2011, with only 2.8% predicting a
decline.
Almost 70% of European companies 0
responding to the survey intend to enter
international markets for the first time
in 2011. While China and Brazil are
popular destinations for companies
large and small from Europe and North
America, it is interesting to note that
European companies jumping into the
international arena for the first time
find the US market just as appealing as
China.
56% of companies expect to end 2011 0
with more employees than at the start of
the year. An interesting sidelight is that
CEOs are more optimistic about adding
staff in 2011 (65.6%) than their employ-
ees (54.8%). Memo to our C suite
readersstart spreading the news!
N.S. P
h
o
t
o
b
y
A
n
d
r
e
s
r
/
i
S
t
o
c
k
p
h
o
t
o
.
c
o
m
9 EMDT1102 9 1/28/11 8:15:46 AM
BREAKTHROUGHS
10 | February 2011 European Medical Device Technology emdt.co.uk
GO TO MEDTECHINSIDER.COM FOR DAILY UPDATES ON R&D BREAKTHROUGHS, INDUSTRY
NEWS, REGULATORY UPDATES AND MORE
An international team of physicists and
neuroscientists has reported a break-
through in magnetic resonance imaging
that allows brain scans to be performed
more than seven times faster than what
is currently possible. A physicist from the
University of California, Berkeley, and
colleagues from the University of Minne-
sota and Oxford University describe two
improvements that allow complete 3-D
brain scans to be performed in less than
half a second, instead of the typical two
to three seconds.
When we made the first images,
it was unbelievable how fast we were
going, says David Feinberg, a physicist
and adjunct professor at UC Berkeley
and president of Advanced MRI Tech-
nologies. It was like stepping out of a
prop plane into a jet plane. It was that
magnitude of difference.
For neuroscience, in particular, fast
scans are critical for capturing the
dynamic activity in the brain.
When a functional MRI (fMRI) study
of the brain is performed, about 30 to
60 images covering the entire brain are
repeated hundreds of times like the frames
of a movie. But, in the case of fMRI, its
like a 3-D movie, Feinberg says. By
multiplexing image acquisition for higher
speed, a higher frame rate is achieved,
[capturing] more information faster.
medtechinsider.com/archives/20586
A new type of damage-tolerant
metallic glass that demonstrates
a strength and toughness beyond
that of any known material has
been developed and tested by
researchers at the US Department
of Energys Lawrence Berkeley
National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab)
in collaboration with scientists at the
California Institute of Technology.
Whats more, even better versions of
this new glass may be on the way.
These results mark the first use of a
new strategy for metallic glass fabrica-
tion and we believe we can use it to make
glass that will be even stronger and more
tough, says Robert Ritchie, a materials
scientist who led the Berkeley contribution
to the research.
The metallic glass is a palladium-based
microalloy, which has a high bulk-to-
shear stiffness ratio that counteracts the
intrinsic brittleness of glassy materials.
medtechinsider.com/archives/20644
New Glass Tops Steel in Strength and Toughness
Researchers Achieve Dramatic
Increase in MRI Scanning Speed
10 EMDT1102 10 1/28/11 8:16:42 AM
emdt.co.uk European Medical Device Technology February 2011 | 11
Synthetic Blood
Vessels Developed
in Hydrogels
Researchers from Rice University and
Baylor College of Medicine (BCM) have
broken one of the major roadblocks on
the path to growing transplantable tis-
sue in the lab. Theyve found a way to
grow the blood vessels and capillaries
needed to keep tissues alive.
The inability to grow blood-vessel
networks, or vasculature, in lab-grown
tissues is the leading problem in regen-
erative medicine today, says researcher
Jennifer West, department chair and the
Isabel C. Cameron Professor of Bioen-
gineering at Rice. If you dont have
blood supply, you cannot make a tissue
structure that is thicker than a couple
hundred microns.
A team of researchers led by West
and BCM molecular physiologist
Mary Dickinson chose polyethylene
glycol as a base material for use in the
research project. The nontoxic plastic
is widely used in medical devices and
as a food additive. Building on 10 years
of research in Wests lab, the scientists
modified the polyethylene glycol to
mimic the bodys extracellular matrix
the network of proteins and polysaccha-
rides that make up a substantial portion
of most tissues.
medtechinsider.com/archives/20707
New Alogorithm Accelerates Medical
ImagingBased Diagnostics
An algorithm for processing three-
dimensional images used in many types
of medical diagnosis is available for
licensing. The technology, which was
developed by researchers at the Univer-
sity of Florida to estimate the volume
of tumours, organs and similar objects
imaged by 3-D scans reduces the time
needed to analyse the object of inter-
est. It can be easily integrated with a
graphic user interface and any imaging
tool or picture archiving and communi-
cation system.
The technology uses polar thin plate
splines in lieu of active contour models,
making it anatomy independent. More-
over, it does not require adjustments
when finding surfaces for different
objects.
medtechinsider.com/archives/20450
ASB #021511A
info@advbiomaterials.com | 978.657.0075 | www.advbiomaterials.com
Specializing in polyurethane technology, AdvanSource Biomaterials
offers targeted polymer synthesis and material science expertise tailored
to optimize the design and development of medical devices.
With a focus on developing innovative technological advancements in the field of material science,
AdvanSource Biomaterials is dedicated to meeting the medical industrys most critical challenges.
Products & Services: Structural engineering polymers Antimicrobial polymers
Hydrophilic materials for extrusion and coatings Liquid polymers Targeted mechanical
formulations Homogeneous colorant technologies Prototype coating capabilities
Custom synthesized solutions Project management services
In support of the engineering and medical device communities, AdvanSource Biomaterials is
committed to providing a consultative partnership, on-time delivery, lot-to-lot consistency, a
dedicated technical team and materials spanning the durometer range of 5 Shore A to 75 Shore D.
AdvanSource Biomaterials where partnership makes a material difference.
Creating Technology.
Enabling Success.
11 EMDT1102 11 1/28/11 8:16:50 AM
12 | February 2011 European Medical Device Technology emdt.co.uk
REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS
Early review of guidance
The medical device directives specify the
requirements for the Notified Body consulta-
tion procedure, but not the actual process for
meeting the requirements. Thus, manufactur-
ers should begin the consultation process by
reviewing the European MEDDEV guidance
on borderline products, drug-delivery prod-
ucts and ancillary substances.
1
Section C of
the guidance describes the Notified Body
actions that should be taken to initiate the
consultation procedure, the documentation
to be provided by the Notified Body to the
Competent Authority for medicinal products,
and the consultation process itself. Particular
attention should be paid to section C.3; it
outlines the documentation required, which
will be unfamiliar to most medical device
manufacturers. This makes early planning a
necessity for preparing documentation that
will be acceptable to drug regulatory authori-
ties and accurately reflects device safety and performance charac-
teristics, so as to avoid costly delays during the review process.
Equally important is the early identification of guidance
documents from national Competent Authorities, which may
potentially be consulted. The UK Medicines and Healthcare
products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) and the Irish Medicines
Board (IMB) are mentioned in this article and also in Part 1 as
examples of Competent Authorities that provide consultation on
ancillary substances and have developed guidance on how they
manage the process. Other Competent Authorities may have
similar guidance available. If the European Medicines Agency
(EMA) is to be consulted, the current
2
and draft EMA guidance
3
on the consultation procedure should be reviewed. The draft
EMA guidance is useful for planning purposes because it con-
tains updated links and references.
Manufacturers of medical devices incorporating ancillary substances should have a clear
understanding of the consultation procedure that their Notified Body will have to follow.
Part 1 of this article discussed the regulatory requirements and important guidance
documents. Part 2 covers aspects of the process itself, required documentation and fees.
Dr Maria E. Donawa
Physician, pathologist and pharmacist with nearly 30 years
regulatory experience, worked with US FDA before becoming
President of what is now Donawa Lifescience Consulting,
a full-service European CRO and an international consultancy company,
which provides regulatory, quality and European Authorised Representative
services to life science companies.
The Notified Body Consultation
Procedure: Part 2
P
h
o
t
o
b
y
A
r
t
u
r
G
a
b
r
y
s
i
a
k
/
i
S
t
o
c
k
p
h
o
t
o
.
c
o
m
12 EMDT1102 12 1/28/11 8:23:35 AM
emdt.co.uk European Medical Device Technology February 2011 | 13
Selecting a Notied Body
The Notified Body is responsible for contacting the Competent
Authority or EMA to initiate the consultation procedure. As stated
in the MEDDEV guidance document, the Notified Body should
ensure that the data supplied by the manufacturer include a
specific segment on the ancillary medicinal substance or the ancil-
lary human blood derivative incorporated in the medical device.
The Notified Body also must verify the usefulness of the ancillary
substance as part of the medical device, taking into account the
intended purpose of the device. This is a critical responsibility and
step in the consultation procedure because the Competent Author-
ity or EMA will need to take this verification into consideration in
reaching an opinion on the quality and safety of the substance.
If a manufacturer is in the early phase of a project involving a
medical device incorporating an ancillary substance, and has not
yet contracted a Notified Body, the potential benefits of selecting
one with experience and established procedures for managing
the consultation procedure should be considered. For a consulta-
tion on an ancillary medicinal substance, the manufacturer can
select any national Competent Authority to provide an opinion
on the substance and should make this selection in close coop-
eration with the Notified Body. A Competent Authority that is
likely to provide the most efficient and cost-effective consultation
and, if possible, which has experience in authorising a medicinal
product that incorporates the same medicinal substance, should
be selected. A Notified Body with experience in working with
several Competent Authorities will be able to provide an opinion
on this critical aspect of the process.
Timelines
The opinion of the national Competent Authority or the EMA
must be provided within 210 days after the receipt of valid docu-
mentation. This requirement is specified in the Medical Devices
Directive (MDD; 93/42/EEC) in Section 4.3, Annex II, and Section
5, Annex III, and in the Active Implantable Medical Devices Direc-
tive (AIMDD; 90/385/EEC) in Section 4.3, Annex 2, and Section 5,
Annex 3.
It is important to note that this timeframe is based upon the
receipt of documentation that the regulatory authority considers
acceptable for providing an opinion; therefore, project time-
lines should consider the possibility that additional time may be
needed during the submission process to satisfy the authority. A
Notified Body with experience in the consultation procedure is
likely to be more accurate in estimating the actual time needed to
complete this process than one without this experience.
Pre-submission activities and meetings
Although there are similarities among regulatory authorities
on pre-submission activities, some differences exist. For this
reason, if the consultation will be provided by a national Com-
petent Authority, any guidance issued by the authority should
13 EMDT1102 13 1/28/11 8:23:42 AM
14 | February 2011 European Medical Device Technology emdt.co.uk
REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS
be reviewed in advance of the submission to understand what is
expected during the pre-submission period. For example, section
2.1, Pre-submission meetings and notification, of the MHRA
consultation procedure guidance
4
states that in order to facilitate
allocation of the consultation to assessors in the relevant thera-
peutic assessment team, it is helpful to send a pre-submission
notification email to the contacts on the first page of the guid-
ance when a submission date has been identified. The IMB con-
sultation procedure guidance
5
describes pre-submission activities
in section 3.1 of its guidance document, stating that the Notified
Body should request in writing a consultation with the IMB ide-
ally six months before the intended submission.
If consultation is sought from the EMA, manufacturers should
refer to the section on pre-submission activities of the draft EMA
guidance, which includes a link to the EMA web page on Ancillary
medicinal substances. The EMA also requires that the Notified
Body provide an intention to submit letter at least six months
before the expected date of submission. Both current and draft
versions of the EMA guidance state that the letter should include
the date of expected submission and the scientific explanation that
the action of the medicinal substance incorporated in the medical
device is only ancillary to that of the device. Both versions state
that the scientific explanation should be in line with the MEDDEV
guidance; however, the draft guidance refers to the current ver-
sion2.1/3 rev 3, December 2009instead of the obsolete version.
Depending upon the authority involved with the consultation, a
pre-submission meeting may be required or may be optional. For
example, the EMA strongly recommends a pre-submission meet-
ing at least six months before the expected date of submission.
The IMB requires a pre-submission meeting, which should be held
at least two months before the expected date of submission. The
MHRA states that meetings associated with an imminent consul-
tation may be arranged as part of the consultation procedure. It
also states that a scientific advice meeting to discuss the consulta-
tion at an early stage, which is chargeable, may also be arranged.
Data requirements and format
The documentation that should be provided by the Notified Body
to the Competent Authority or EMA is described in the MEDDEV
guidance on ancillary substances; however, important reference
is made to any relevant national guidance where consultation is
provided by a Competent Authority or to EMA guidance where
consultation is provided by that agency.
As stated in the MEDDEV guidance, the information provided
to the Notified Body should be based upon Annex I of Medici-
nal Products Directive (2001/83/EC), as amended by Directive
2003/63/EC. This latter directive contains a revised Annex I of
Directive 2001/83/EC, Analytical, Pharmacotoxicological and
Clinical Standards and Protocols in Respect of the Testing of
Medicinal Products, which is currently in force.
Although the format requested by the various regulatory authori-
ties may differ, the data requirements and information requested is
consistent with that described in the MEDDEV guidance. For exam-
ple, the first section, General information, should include a general
description of the medical device, including the manufacturers claim
regarding the purpose of incorporation of the ancillary medicinal
substance or the ancillary human blood derivative, together with a
critical appraisal of the results of the risk assessment.
The section Quality documentation is divided into two sec-
tions, the first providing information on the ancillary medicinal
substance or the ancillary human blood derivative. This section
should include relevant parts of the Common Technical Docu-
ment (CTD) Module 3, in accordance with the format described
in Volume 2B, Notice to Applicants, Medicinal products for
human use, Presentation and format of the dossier Common
Technical Document (CTD). Guidance is also provided on how
to provide information on the active substance. The section
should also include CTD Module 2.3, Quality Overall Summary
in accordance with Volume B, Notice to Applicants.
The second section describes the information to be provided
on the ancillary substance as incorporated in the medical device.
The remaining sections cover nonclinical documentation, clinical
evaluation and labeling.
Payment processes and fees
Section 4.5, Fees, of the draft EMA guidance includes updated
links to fees charged for the consultation procedure. For example,
the fee charged for an initial request concerning an ancillary sub-
stance that is new to the EMA centralised procedure is 76,000; a
known ancillary blood derivative from a known source, 57,200;
or a known ancillary medicinal substance from a known source,
38,100. Small and medium enterprises can apply for fee reduc-
tions. Readers should refer to the websites of the Competent
Authority of interest to obtain a current list of fees. 1
References
1. Borderline products, drug-delivery products and medical devices
incorporating, as an integral part, an ancillary medicinal substance or
an ancillary human blood derivative (MEDDEV 2.1/3 Rev. 3, December
2009); http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/sectors/medical-devices/documents/
borderline/index_en.htm
2. EMEA recommendation on the procedural aspects and dossier
requirements for the consultation to the EMEA by a Notified Body on
an ancillary medicinal substance or an ancillary human blood derivative
incorporated in a medical device (Doc. Ref. EMEA/CHMP/401993/2005,
24 April 2008); www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/
Regulatory_and_procedural_guideline/2009/10/WC500004337.pdf
3. European Medicines Agency recommendation on the procedural aspects
and dossier requirements for the consultation to the European Medicines
Agency by a Notified Body on an ancillary medicinal substance or an
ancillary human blood derivative incorporated in a medical device or
active implantable medical device (Draft, 21 October 2010); www.ema.
europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Regulatory_and_procedural_
guideline/2010/10/WC500098403.pdf
4. United Kingdom Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency
guidance on the consultation procedure; www.mhra.gov.uk/howweregulate/
devices/medicaldevicesdirective/drug-deviceconsultations/index.htm
5. Irish Medicines Board guidance on the consultation procedure; www.
imb.ie/en/medical-devices/premarket-activities/drugdevice-combination-
products.aspx
14 EMDT1102 14 1/28/11 8:23:46 AM
emdt.co.uk European Medical Device Technology February 2011 | 15
MATERIALS
Altered functionality
Advances in silicone technology have
enabled a number of breakthroughs.
Although silicone has been part of the
innovation process in many industries, its
contribution to the healthcare industry
arguably has been especially beneficial.
By means of various surface modi-
fications, silicone can be manipulated
physically and chemically to alter its
functionality. For instance, using a silicone
primer can change the bond and energy
levels of a variety of different substrates
to promote adhesion. Alternatively, many
medical devices depend on minimising
friction at the interface between various
components and between components and
human tissue. In the past, silicone gels or
even self-lubricating elastomers were used
in these situations; however, both of these
applications carry the potential for uncon-
trolled migration of the lubricious compo-
nent. This concern has paved the way for
the newest development in silicone technol-
ogyheat-curable silicone dispersions that
covalently bond to a silicone substrate and
result in a dry yet low-tack finish.
Silicone polymer fundamentals
Understanding the basic structure of a sili-
cone polymer is the first step in developing
new methods of surface modification. First,
there are nonfunctional silicone polymers.
Silicone polymers are chains (backbones)
comprised of repeating Si-O units, termed
siloxane, with organic groups occupying
any of the remaining bonding sites (R)
on the silicon atom not already occupied
by oxygen atoms. (See Figure 1.) Carbon
does not play a part in the backbone of
these polymersthe substituents (R) often
contain a carbon-silicon bondand for
this reason silicone polymers are described
as polyorganosiloxanes.
During the polymerisation process, two
main factors are controlled: the substitu-
ent groups and the degree of polymerisa-
tion. Although many combinations are
possible, the main nonfunctional pendant
groups (R) attached to the polymer back-
bone can be methyl, phenyl or trifluoro-
propyl. Generally, a material is referred to
as a polymer if a molecule contains only
one type of substituent group; a copoly-
mer has a molecule that contains a combi-
nation of substituent groups. Furthermore,
all silicone polymers can be synthesised
to a specific degree of polymerisation.
The degree of polymerisation dictates the
average molecular weight, which, in turn,
governs the viscosity. A silicone polymer
can have a viscosity close to that of water
(20 cP) or it can be so dense as to be a
solid (several million centipoise).
R R R R R R
o o o o o o
R
Si
R
Si
R
Si
R
Si
R
Si
R
Si
FIGURE 1: A silicone polymer backbone.
P
h
o
t
o
b
y
:
G
n
a
y
M
u
t
l
u
/
i
S
t
o
c
k
p
h
o
t
o
.c
o
m
Advances in Silicone
Surface Treatments
Silicone coatings promote adhesion or lubricity, but they can cause uncontrolled
material migration in the process. Dispersions that form a covalent bond with an
elastomer silicone substrate can prevent that from happening.
M. Lindberg, NuSil, Sophia Antipolis, France
15 EMDT1102 15 1/28/11 8:24:35 AM
16 | February 2011 European Medical Device Technology emdt.co.uk
MATERIALS
Adhesion
Historically, the main reason for modify-
ing silicone surfaces has been to improve or
allow adhesion to various substrates. Bond-
ing any type of silicone requires an under-
standing of the mechanisms necessary for
a good bondsurface energy and chemical
reactivity. Surface energy is the thermo-
dynamic effect related to a materials
intramolecular forces, and it is a determin-
ing factor in how an adhesive will spread
across a substrate surface. It is commonly
accepted that the substrates surface energy
must exceed that of the adhesive to achieve
adequate contact.
1
Moreover, the better an
adhesive spreads, the more intimate will be
the contact between molecules, allowing
more reactive groups to interact or bond.
In aggregate, the interactions between
the adhesive and the substrate produce a
stronger bond.
Low-surface-energy materials, such as
some plastics, do not allow silicone adhe-
sives to spread out, which means they are
generally poor candidates for bonding.
However, it is possible to raise the surface
energy of some plastics through processes
such as UV radiation, plasma and corona
discharge or by flame or acid treatments.
The presence of oxygen-containing spe-
cies, such as OH groups, on the surface of
plastics provides reactive sites for silicone
adhesives and primer systems. These proc-
esses affect chemical adhesion, or chemical
bonding such as covalent, hydrogen or other
weaker forces, between the silicone and
substrate. Substrates with reactive groups
available for bondingOH groups on
glass, and oxide layers on metals such as
aluminiummake this chemical bond easier
to achieve. Substrates with inert surfaces
lacking reactive sites, such as graphite and
polytetrafluoroethylene, can make adhesion
difficult.
Lubrication
Regardless of chemistry, silicone polymers
will have varying levels of success as a lubri-
cant or hydrophobic coating on a variety of
substrates including moulded silicone parts,
metal, glass and many plastics. Methods
of applying the polymer include dipping,
spraying, brushing or wiping. If a very thin
film is desired, silicone polymers may be
further diluted to as little as 15% silicone
solids in a compatible solvent. Methyl poly-
mers may be dispersed in nonpolar organic
solvents, whereas fluoropolymers and
copolymers may be dispersed in chlorinated
hydrocarbons and ketones and, to a lesser
extent, aromatic hydrocarbons, mineral
spirits and isopropyl alcohol. For ease of
use with minimal processing, some medical
device manufacturers select polymers that
are predispersed to a specified percentage of
solids content.
When coating or lubricating a moulded
part, it is important to consider the
chemistry of the moulded part versus the
chemistry of the lubricant. At the time of
application, if more than a few hours of
lubrication are needed, select a fluoropoly-
mer or copolymer silicone lubricant. Oth-
erwise, the silicone fluid will diffuse into
the elastomer, both swelling the moulded
component and depleting the fluid on the
elastomers surface, effectively reducing
or eliminating the lubricating charac-
teristics. Since a fluids rate of diffusion
into a silicone elastomer decreases as the
fluids molecular weight increases, higher-
viscosity fluids lubricate a silicone elasto-
meric surface for a slightly longer period
compared with a lower-viscosity fluid. On
temperature-resistant materials such as
glass, ceramic and metal, silicone polymers
and copolymers can be converted to highly
durable hydrophobic films by heating the
treated surfaces.
Beyond polymers (predispersed and
otherwise), some dispersed silicone for-
mulations are designed to cure at ambi-
ent conditions. These formulations yield
a minimal crosslink density that results
in a slippery finish similar to the afore-
mentioned polymers. Unlike polymers,
however, dispersed silicone formulations
minimally bond to the substrate they coat.
This feature makes these products ideal for
lubricating cutting edges, needle cannulae
and so forth. These silicone formulations
are one-part dispersions that devolatilise
and cure at ambient conditions. They may
be applied by dipping or wiping. When
working with these formulations, it is
important to remember that they tend to
be moisture sensitive. Consequently, if
adjustment to the percent solids or vis-
cosity is needed, it is important to use a
moisture-free organic solvent.
FIGURE 3: A silicone slab, half of which is coated with a low coefcient of friction coating (matte side);
the other half (glossy) is uncoated.
FIGURE 2: A self-lubricating liquid silicone rubber slab. The middle portion has been wiped to show the
lubricant on the sides.
16 EMDT1102 16 1/28/11 8:24:40 AM
emdt.co.uk European Medical Device Technology February 2011 | 17
MATERIALS
when coated, will bend, twist and elongate
without cracking, flaking or peeling.
Conclusion
Silicones offer diverse and emerging solu-
tions to the challenges of the healthcare
industry. Silicone polymers and low-cross-
link-density coatings are well-established
performers that routinely deliver critical
criteria in a host of applications. The newest
friction minimising silicone coating will
revolutionise applications where the migra-
tion of greases or oils historically has been a
problem. Silicones will continue to play an
important role in an industry determined
to meet demand for ever-more effective
products. 1
Matthew Lindberg
is Technical Sales at NuSil. NuSil Technology -
Europe is located at Parc dActivits de Sophia
Antipolis, Le Natura Bt2, 1198, avenue Maurice
Donat, F-06250 Mougins, France
tel. +33 4 9296 9331; e-mail: silicone@nusil.com
www.nusil.com
References
1. J. Comyn, Adhesion Science, Royal Society of
Chemistry, Cambridge, UK; 1997.
Advanced formulations
Technological advances have resulted in
novel formulations and improvements on
friction-minimising surface treatments. For
example, some silicone elastomers that are
designed for moulding will self-lubricate.
Self-lubricating liquid silicone rubbers do
not require the additional processing step
of adding a lubricant, lubricious coating or
grease. Instead, the lubricity is built into
the silicone elastomer system, yielding a
lubricious coating on the moulded surface.
This is caused by the elution of additives
over time after the vulcanisation process is
complete. However, with this formulation,
as with all of the above, there is potential
for uncontrolled migration of the lubricious
component.
Addressing this concern has brought
about the most recent breakthrough in
the evolving technology of silicone coat-
ings: a heat-curable silicone dispersion that
covalently bonds to the silicone elastomer
substrate and results in a dry, friction-
minimising finish.
The development of this formulation is
the result of two industry goals: finding a
coating for moulded or extruded silicone
parts that overcomes the materials inherent
blocking characteristic and achieving this
without creating potential for migration
of any formulary components. Over time,
hydrogen bonding causes cured silicones to
develop an affinity for themselves and other
surfaces such that they want to stick rather
than slide. This presents obvious problems
in a host of applications where a moulded
or extruded silicone part must move or slide
with a modicum of friction.
By spraying or dipping the friction-
diminishing silicone coating on a substrate,
there is a dramatic reduction in the parts
coefficient of friction. The result is a dura-
ble yet flexible coating that resists abrasion
from moving, sliding and rubbing parts.
This silicone formulation meets critical
performance goals with negligible impact
on the mechanical properties of the silicone
substrates it coats. Once cured, the coating
will chemically bond to the silicone elas-
tomer substrate and mimic its mechanical
properties, achieving a final product that,
Extrusion
Moulding
Assembly
Your Single
Source Provider