Preview of the Ancient Mother Series on Hinduism and its Counterfeit Together with Objection and Answers

Contents

Preface Hinduism and its counterfeit Review in Kesari weekly Comments on the Internet Objections and Answers Impotence of the omnipotent Root Cause of Social Problems Assessment by M.C. Menon An entirely false construct Appendix

The following pages are intended as a curtain raiser to the Ancient Mother series of books. Two works have been published already in the seriesThe Key to the bible and The Judgement on christianity. Those works encompass a wide range of concepts and realities. The exposition of these concepts and realities was dissertational. Such an approach was necessitated by the overriding preoccupation with the focal point of the unbeknown true identity of christianity and its source being. The present booklet while concerned with the same identity conforms to the requirements of a preview. Accordingly, footnotes have dropped off. The presentation is light in accord with the canvas of a brief preview. The first part is devised and formulated in the mode of a personal appeal to Hindus. The second part is a published review of the books from the pen of T.R.Somasekharan, chief editor of Kesari weekly.

A few comments from browsers on the Internet are also incorporated. It is hoped that these pages will be of use to the reader in following the books all the more comprehensively. Sep. 1997 Leo Panakal In this second edition I have added a new section of objections and answers and the epilogue, Impotence of the omnipotent. Dec 1997 L. P.

This third edition adds a vital new limb to the Preview, an article on the Ancient Mother treatises and its author by Mr. MC. Menon. April 1998 L. P.

In this fourth edition I have added the appendix, a memorandum sent originally to the Templeton Foundation. It is reproduced for its societal considerations and for certain complexions of the identity omitted from the Preview proper. July 2000 L P.

Preview of the Ancient Mother Series of Treatises

Part I

A Paper by Leo Panakal on Hinduism and its counterfeit

[Readers are requested to consult the glossary at the end for meaning of the Sanskrit terms]

Let me first of all express gratitude for the opportunity of communicating with you by means of this paper. Herein I shall deal centrally with certain aspects of our make-up as a people, how those aspects are responsible for the present situation of Hindus and thirdly how a remedy is possible through correct knowledge of christianity as a conscious counterfeit of Hinduism. We Hindus are the unwitting victims of two weaknesses m our constitution as a race. Both these foibles are understandable spills-over from our antiquity which is unmatched by any other race of people. Our antiquity also echoes the sounds and symbols of yugas predating the ongoing Kaliyuga. Sri Krishna in the Mahabharatha faults Yudhishtira when he fights shy of a subterfuge but for which the battle for Dharma would have been lost. Yudhishtiras ambivalence echoes from prior yugas including Sathyayuga when Dharma was allpervasive and not in need of props or subterfuges for its ascendance. But this is not so in Kaliyuga when, says Markandeya, all conditions will be reversed. Therefore, Sri Krishna enunciates to mankind Through Hindus a prime principle of action in Kaliyuga. In welcome justification of the subterfuge laid out by him in the cause of Dharma he propounds to a doubting Yudhishtira: The era of Kali has arrived when the laws of a previous age cannot apply. More than Sri Krishna in his active principle we Hindus tend to blow Yudhishtira in his disregard of the existence of Kali in this present yuga. This has cost us dearly in terms of the overhanging loss of the punyabhoomi of Bharatham to the secularists and the semitists. History is but an endless stream of cause-effect. The effect at a given moment immediately turns into the cause of yet another effect. This whole process is called eternity of creation in out scriptural parlance. And this is one point on which not only the Jainas but also the Baudhas agree with our Vedas. Bharath remained impenetrable to alien races. This impenetrability was both physical and intellectual. Physically, the territory was almost wholly insulated by the Himalayas on one side and the ocean on a] other sides. Intellectually, thanks entirely to the Rishis the country, from the moment of its first impact on perception, was at the pinnacle of achievement in every department of knowledge. We Hindus have been in this land for timeless ages as its natural heirs. Nobody else has any claim of this kind. However much they try, they wit] never succeed in establishing such a claim even to themselves. Flora Annie Steel wrote 150 years ago:- Hinduism is IndiaIndia is Hinduism. When the last trace of the metaphysical monism which underlies every aspiration,

every action has disappeared, India and Hinduism will have disappeared also, but not till then. The British author did not have the axe of secularism to grind. The highest knowledge was knowledge of the Self or Atman. Ultimate reality was consciousness or Prqjna and not god of the semitics. Of this universal Atman, the Upanishads say My Self within the heart smaller than a corn of rice, smaller than a mustard seed, smaller than the kernel of a canary seed: My Self within the heart greater than the earth, greater than the sky, greater than heaven. Lo! He who beholds all beings in this Self, and Self in all beings, he never turns away from it. He, the Self encircles all, bright, incorporeal, scatheless, pure; a seer, wise, omnipresent, self-existent. He therefore who knows after having become quiet, subdued, satisfied, patient and collected, sees Self in Self sees all in Self; free from stain, free from doubt, he becomes true Brahman. The wise who, meditating on this Self, recognises the Ancient who dwells for ever in the abyss, he indeed leaves joy and sorrow far behind; having reached the subtle being, he rejoices because he has obtained the cause of rejoicing. This supreme gnanam originates either in the present life or in a future life. It will originate in the present life itself if there is no obstruction of what is ready at hand. When the means of knowledge which is operative is not obstructed by some other work, knowledge already reaches maturity in this life. The person becomes jeevan mukta. The extraneous obstruction is due to the operation of cause-effect. When such an obstruction takes place, knowledge reaches maturity in the next life. Such a man, explains Sri Krishna. reaches the world of the blessed and is, later on, born in a good family. Gnanam although springing up through the mediation of learning, experience, association, and so on, springs up only in so far as these destroy the obstacles in the way of knowledge. Punarjanmam operates in furtherance of and in the interest of gnanam. Punarjanm am terminates the moment the individual assumes supreme gnanam. According to Sankaracharya. this spontaneous apprehension of supersensible truth is only possible through the knowledge acquired in previous existences. Such termination of samsara constitutes moksha, which is eternal in the true sense. That is to say, it is eternal without undergoing any changes kutasthanitya. It is omnipresent, free from all modifications, absolutely self-sufficient, not composed of parts and is self-luminous in nature. Moksha, says Mundakopanishad, becomes manifested automatically before the one who strives after it. Neither by prophecy, nor by intellectual ability, nor even by constant listening is knowledge/moksha attained. But whosoever any saadhakan who lives his life striving after self realisation that one gains it. Before him the Self becomes manifested automatically. Audulomi even gives the lakshana of the released Self. According to Audulomi, its only characteristic is thought (chaitanya). Humanitys best hope of immortality. so comments one foreign dissertator on moksham, lies in the apprehension of the inviolable laws of our universe of which India is aware. Hindus have the appearance of being drawn by one who was more deeply versed in the subject than may at first be imagined, and who knew much more than he thought it necessary to communicate. Let us proceed to the Hun essays into Hindustan. The country was now cent percent Hindu both in respect of its inhabitants and in respect of its shrines and monuments. The Jews had been on our shores from earlier times. But they never betrayed the generosity received by them. On their first aggression the Huns were squarely defeated by Hindus. Their leader was

taken prisoner. But bhoodadaya soon set in. Animated by bhoodadaya, Hindus freed him on condition that he leave the land for good. The Huns responded by returning later to make a treacherous attack on their life-givers. Our sasthras list eight gunas, ashtaguna, necessary in man. Bhoodadaya is the first of these. The others are: kshama, anasooya, saucham, anaayaasam, mangalam, akaarpanyam and aspruha. From the perspective of history viewed as cause-effect the Hun invasion is the watershed in the history of the Hindu people. The land had been overrun before, but this invasion brought with it a perfect horror of havoc. Far more so than the Hun invasion of Europe. There the ultimate savage met only with Goths and Visigoths for the most part. The Hurts were to be followed by a motley procession of plunderers and pogromists. These atrocities on the body and mind of our land brought about a genetic change in the psyche of the Hindu races. Jawaharlal Nehru has described this as an inner change. Writes Flora Annie Steel: India at the end of those ten Slave reigns was a very different place to what India had been when Eibuks hand first closed on it. Half the Punjab, almost all Rajputana, and the better part of the United Provinces, had run red with Hindu blood in those days; but as the stream subsided, the terrible legacy of the flood had remained as a lesson welding the whole land into apathetic acquiescence until absorption set in with the years, and as time went on, the crushed half-dead organism began once more to feel life in its veins. For Hinduism is IndiaIndia is Hinduism. As indicated, our scriptures detail a crisis of deeper import for mankind. In the final moments of the Mahahharatha battle Dharma became irredeemable except by discarding it. Sri Krishna already had enunciated the right principle of action in Kaliyuga. Applying the principle, he now asks Yudhishtira to utter an untruth in the cause of the highest truth or Dharma. However the battle for Dharma is only saved at the last moment by an accident. Yudhishtiras ambivalent words are drowned in the battle din. The gene of Dharma is saved. Thus far the devastation of Bharatham, however iniquitous, had been directed primarily against physical targets. The plunder and slaughter, however barbaric, were besides open and visible. These are the tribal semitics. As they are tribal, they are transparent in their intentions and actions. This makes them at any rate a perceivable enemy. Here is an old account that indirectly bespeaks the transparency of these tribalists: There is one cry of terror which from time immemorial has echoed out over Northern India. The Toork! The Toork! rises the cry and m an instant jewels are torn off and hidden and with a wild prayer to some god for protection, the ultimate atom of India awaits destruction or dishonour or death in apathetic despair. It must have needed a bitter biting to have engraven this fear so indelibly on the Hindu heart. To these religious tribalists massacre of the gentle Hindu in his ancient homeland is a theistic obligation. Confidently therefore Timur at the end of a horrid record of brutal butchery offers to the semitic god sincere and humble tribute of grateful praise for his victory. His resort appropriately was a mosque built earlier on the banks of the Jumna. He then quit Hindustan taking with him plunder Inconceivable. He left anarchy, famine, pestilence behind him. The victory of the semitic god was the result of carnage against man beyond description. At Bhatnir the headquarters of the Rajputs, the inhabitants were cut off to a man, the men, wives and children. The place itself was reduced to ashes. That night (Jan. 12, 1389) the one thousand Hindu prisoners were slain in cold blood. The lanes were barricaded by the bodies of the dead as more and more Hindus were butchered. Hindus date themselves and all their affairs from after the beginning of Kaliyuga. The

French papist missioniser Abbe J.A Dubois spent long years in the Carnatic monitoring the Brahmins for composing his treatise on Hindu manners, customs and ceremonies. Dressed to seem like a Hindu saadhu, he was in truth a fugitive from the French revolution. He found Kaliyuga to be the commencement of the true as of the Hindus. In all their ordinary transactions, in the promulgation of all their acts, in all their public monuments, the Hindus date everything from the commencement of Kali. They speak of the Kaliyuga as the only era recognised as authentic. Kaliyuga translates as the age of anger. We shall now see how, when and by whom the gene of anger was discharged into consciousness. The actual genesis of this gene end the identity of its author are not to be sought in the Hindu scriptures. Mahabharatha is concerned with the dissolution of this gene. Vyasan finds this gene in operation. He proceeds to terminate it 1 have conceived an excellent work, says Vyasan in reference to the genesis of the concept of Mahabharatham. The Rishi is indifferent to the identity of the personal author of this gene. The objective factor of universal goodness militates against acknowledgement of such an author on his part. Malayalam author Ezhuthachan traces to the gene of anger the great crimes of matricide, patricide and fratricide as also that of homicide of friends and acquaintances. Ezhuthachan wrote further that it is this same gene of krodham that became Yaman. Even at the risk of an apparent contradiction, the Hindu consciousness ultimately treats the same Yaman as king of Dharma. This apparent contradiction is on account of the nature of Hindu consciousness. It views everything including personalised krodham in the light of universal goodness. This is the second Hindu weakness that is alluded to in the beginning. It is responsible, no less than the other, for the present situation of Hindus. The subjective perception of everything as good makes Hindus disabled as a race to apprehend positive evil, which is an objective factor in Kaliyuga. For the clue to the author of anger gene we must look elsewhere than in Hindu scriptures. The Hindu consciousness has formed itself from the Hindu scriptures. Scripture comprises an underived body of works that relate the history of consciousness from its genesis to dissolution. Our Hindu scriptures fulfill the norms of scripture. They are underived from any prior literature. Even non-conformists concede that Rigveda is mans earliest literature. Purushasooktham of Rigveda pertains to the genesis of consciousness. The Sanskrit scriptures proceed from there upto mahapralayam or super deluge of consciousness. At this point everything gets dissolved including Brahmav. This signifies the termination of scripture. The regeneration is effected by Sivan who is both destroyer and regenerator at the same time. Purushasooktham is focused upon the preeminence of man. On this preeminence Swami Vivekananda says: Man is higher than all animals, than all angels; none is greater than man. Even the devas will have to come down again and attain to salvation through a human body. Man alone attains to perfection, not even the devas. This human birth is the greatest birth we can have. In laboured opposition to the primacy of man as obtaining in the antecedent Hindu scriptures, the semitic scriptures exude a common burden of world-worthlessness. This motive is exalted and rounded off in the pronounced christian scriptures. The christian scriptures are however semitic at their origin. This semitic basis covers even the Greek version of the so called old testament which appeared in subsequence to the original Hebrew texts. The christian scriptures of the so-called new testament take the depravity of the human

race for granted. This position of the christian faith is imposed upon the race itself as an obligation. The christian faith is assumed to have such universal authority by reason of the alleged voluntary death of its source-being, namely, jesus, uterine son of Mary. Right at the beginning of christianity Paul claims this authority. He wrote that every thought should be brought into captivity in the service of christianity. We are holding ourselves in readiness to inflict punishment for every disobedience against christianity. This text of Paul is included in the new testament as authentic. The bible starts from a solitary being called Adam. He is subsequently presented with a female called Eve. They get two sons, Cain and Abel, Cain being the elder of the two. Eve feels that she is indebted to the christian god in conceiving and giving birth to Cain. So Cain gives the god an offering out of crops from his land. Abel follows with an offering of the flesh of a lamb that he killed. The christian god, continues the bible, favoured Abel and his bloody sacrifice and did not favour Cain and his sacrifice. Five lakshanas of pisach are given in the Vedas. They are collectively called pisachadharma-panchakam. One of these lakshanas is mamsa-priyathwam or fondness for flesh. The others are avivekam, ajnanam, asathyam and asaucham. In accepting Abels bloody sacrifice and rejecting Cains bloodless sacrifice, the christian god revealed his true identity as pisach. In christian phraseology the name of this particular pisach is Lucifer. Cain is in rage (rosham) over the reaction of the god. The god perceives this and finds here a chance to mutate the gene of rosham into that of krodham. He asked Cain: What does this anger mean? The crucial words in the question arc this and anger. The first one means the person, thing or idea that has just been mentioned. In the case before us, it is rage that has just been mentioned. The text reads in the sentence immediately before: Cain was much enraged. But the christian god mutates this original rage into anger when making this refer to anger instead of rage. Rage and anger are two distinct genes, their etyma being different The English word rage has the Sanskrit word rabhas as its etymos. The etymos of anger however is the Greek word anchein. The concept of etymos is the bedrock of western linguistics understood as etymology. Our Sanskrit linguistics go even beyond etymos, being founded upon the Vedic concept of sphotam or sabdabrahmam. Sankaracharya explains sphota as a supersensuous entity that exists over and above the aggregate of the letters in a word. This supersensuous entity is the direct cause of the apprehension of the sense of a word. We all know from observation, continues Sankaracharya, that any one when setting about something which he wishes to accomplish first remembers the word denoting the thing, and alter that sets to work. We therefore conclude that before the creation the Vedic words became manifest in the mind of Prajapati the creator, and that alter that he created the things corresponding to those words. Scripture also, where it says, uttering bhur be created the earth, shows that the worlds such as the earth, etc., became manifest, i.e., were created from the words bhur, etc., which had become manifest in the mind of Prajapati. Sphotam has denotative power. It produces the object denoted. Therefore, when the christian god utters anger in the wake of this he sets anger in motion from its inertial existence in himself, its original spokesman in a book claiming to be genesis and professed as scripture. This is why anger is already found in consciousness by Vyasan.

By reason of the positive sinlessness of Hindu scriptures, we must look elsewhere than in the Hindu scriptures for the history of the origin of anger in the christian god. Mystics transcend time. For this reason we must look for the history in christian mystical literature rather than in the dated christian bible. The writings of the catholic nun Mary of Agreda constitute this literature. She lived in the 17th century in a nunnery in Spain. By intense, single-minded and prolonged mental and physical exercises, she was able to transcend her own lime and establish tactile contact with the subject of her manipulated faith. Suddenly she is transported to paataala-loka, the objective abode of the subject of her faith. There she beheld and participated in a council held by the being named as Narakaasuran in our Hindu scriptures and as Lucifer in the christian version of the bible. The true identity of the being is beyond the ken of this woman in her abnormal faith in the same being in his subsequent name of jesus. She factually records the proceedings of the council along with her own observations as a direct participant. The book ranks as standard religious literature of the christians, especially the catholics, and has title of Revelations of Mary of Agreda. Mary of Agreda directly quotes from the articulations of Lucifer at this council attended by the asuras who fell along with him to paataala-loka. In the sin-bound christian terminology these asuras are designated as fallen angels and paataala-loka as hell. One third of the total number of angels were cast into hell, the sin-bound christian tradition asserts. The Vedas declare objectively that by the self force of paapam (paapasakhti) they dropped to paataalam. According to the christians the jesus who emerged from Mary began his abysmal career with a sermon he gave from the top of a hill. The talk has three aaptha-vakyams: Blessed are the poor, blessed are the meek, blessed are they that mourn. Mary of Agreda heard the same aaptha-vakyams from the mouth of Lucifer speaking at the council he held in. the nether world upon dropping there. This untransformed Lucifer acquired the idiom of human goodness upon transformation into jesus from paisacha vivaham with a willing human female. The resulting pregnancy is scientifically known as parthenogenesis development of an unfertilised female sex cell without any male contribution. A three-yearold boy studied recently by British geneticists is the first perceived case of parthenogenesis. The case was reported in the Hindu daily of Nov. 9, 1995. The case shatters the christian claim of a miraculous and one-time virgin birth for jesus. The whole christian edifice is structured from this allegedly unique phenomenon. It now transpires that jesus had a pseudo-body as well by reason of parthenogenesis complicated by fertilisation by pisach. The aaptha-vakyams of jesus in his sermon when uttered by Lucifer sans the acquired human idiom read thus in the authentic revelations of Mary of Agreda I will afflict the poor, oppress the suffering and persecute the meek. Both sets of aaptha-vakyams feature the word meek which is wholly negative in character. This indicates that both come from the same consciousness. Further, jesus has himself unmistakably announced his true identity as Lucifer. He does so in one of the very last sentences of his new testament. He says there: I jesus am the morning star. Morning star is the sphotam of Lucifer at the point of the start of its Latin history. He can afford to disclose the identity at this stage. He had already set christianity on its course worldwide as the masked deceiver and disguised enemy of man. He ordered his followers, completely deceived as they were, to go around the whole world and disperse his fraudulent claims. He that believeth and is baptised will be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned, he said further. This is how two of them, Bartholomew and Thomas by name, came all the way to

Bharath to subvert our ancestors, the former at Kalyan and the latter in the present Sind. The claims of this Thomas having come to Kerala instead are altogether baseless and dish )nest. The fact is that our ancestors, more discerning than we are, put both these two to death. The christianity they imported, if at all they did so, disappeared without a trace soon afterwards. The existing christianity in Kerala is historically traced to another Thomas, a native of Syria and a merchant by trade, who was granted asylum in the old port city of Cranganur by emperor Cheraman Perumal in accordance with our Hindu dharma on asylum. A large number of ethnic Syrian families who accompanied this Thomas also got asylum on very generous terms. Like the Jews, these people never betrayed the generosity of their Hindu hosts. They are mostly found today at settlements in Kaduthuruthy, Chingavanam and some other places. Christianity is founded upon the fraudulent notion of mans original sin. It defines sin as transgression of the law of the god. The law is thus worded by the god to Adam: You may eat the fruit of any tree in the garden, except from the tree that gives knowledge. You must not eat the fruit of that tree; if you do, you will die at once. According to this notion, sin had its origin in the garden. This notion, further, sanctions all sins against man. Atrocities against man whether in the East or in the West, are the hallmark of christianity from the time it gained a foothold in Europe through political clout. As far as Bharath is concerned, it gained a semblance of presence in Kerala through the political strategies of the Portuguese predators and later through the activities of that totally misguided young man, Francis Xavier. In 1599 it gained formal foothold in the territory by alienating the original adherents, the so-called Syrian christiansas distinct from the ethnic Syriansfrom their Hindu roots. Although thus uprooted, these people especially in Trichur and surroundings, are still Hindu in their general outlook and in certain customs. Scripture is underived. It deals with underived first occurrences in terms of which all other occurrences can themselves be explained. It is circumscribed, however, by and within Kaliyuga. Sin did not originate with man in the garden but with the christian god in his council in paataalam. The certified christian mystic Mary of Agreda personally witnessed this real origination of sin and vouched for it in her writing appropriately called Revelations. She wrote: All sin had its originto repeat originin that abominable gathering. Christianity asserts that the human race as a whole, we Hindus included, inherit at birth the original sin which as a matter of fact it transposes on Adam from its own source-being. But this christian system crashes even at the take-offstage. This is not on account of the systems inherent weakness as exposed by the prior Hindu scriptures which not only do not feature such a sin but do negate it by the notion of paapam which pertains to transgressions between man and man. The crash of the christian sin is on account of the swabhavam of the christian god as an organic rebel. This being so, he can only exist by a positive rebellion against reality at every point. The christian bible being the self expression of this being, it helplessly exudes the reality even as it spews the rebellion against this reality. The christian god is detected affirming in the christian version of the bible the absence of inheritance of sin in Cain. He says dissemblingly to Cain after rejecting his Vedic sacrifice: If your actions are good, can you doubt they will be rewarded? If not, can you doubt there is sin crouching at your entrance. For you is its craving. He concedes herein that sin is still at this point only at Cains door and there is no inheritance of sin in Cain. His utterance that the sin is crouching shows the sin is inertial, in himself, its underived maiden spokesman. There is nothing like a sin in the earlier Hindu scriptures. There is nothing like scripture apart from Vedas and the christian bible, Its sole

counterfeit. By the further articulationfor you is its cravinghe sets the sin in motion in the direction of man as he wants him to become. The act of admission is the helpless outburst of an organic rebel. Only by so admitting, besides, can he set the sin in motion. That is his primary need, the drive behind the admission. He now proceeds to importune Cain to murder Abel, the very one of the two who had pleased him with a bloody rite: Meanwhile, Abel is at your mercy and you can have your way with him. Yet, Cain, who signifies man in Lucifers machinations, declines the bait He instead, by force of the incitement, merely assaults Abel who is later on privately strangled by the socalled god of the christians. He thereafter confronts Cain to account for the body. Cain now, before the spectacle of the body, admits himself to the assassination of Abel by the christian god. This is how sin and its counterpart of guilt came to be in the history of consciousness- -barring the Hinduand paved the way for the stage managed redemption from the same sin by the same christian god through a deftly courted crucifixion. He is now turned son of god too through paisacha vivaham with Mary. The gods compulsive urge to have his favourite, Abel, done to death marks him as the same being as the classical Lucifer. The latter in his manifesto bared before Mary of Agreda thus spelled out the ethos of the compulsion: I will raise up proud and arrogant men to extend the dominion of sin, and after they have executed my designs, I will bury them in this eternal fire, with so much the greater torments the more faithfully they have followed me. To the devas the Vedas are known without study. The christian god is an ex-devan. He lost the abode and footing of devas by failure to hold Dharma when the concept of man first arose in consciousness in swarga-loka. Lucifer and his angels or kinkaras rebelled against the budding concept of man-creation, reports Mary of Agreda. Thereupon be dropped unanticipatedly to the nether world by gravitational force, scripturally expressed as paapasakthi. At this point our Hindu scriptures automatically lose track of him. The Vedic knowledge of a devan is not lost with his self-expulsion. The knowledge is also elaborate, covering expressions no less than concepts. In the shanthi-manthram of Kadopanishad is found the expressed description of knowledge as a fruit. The christian god picks up this expression from his old Vedic repertory. He rebels against the manthram by banning the same fruit under pain of death. The manthram reads: May us guru and sishya be together blessed by the one that is gnana-swarupa. Let him nourish and animate both of us with the exalted fruit which is called knowledge. Our Hindu scriptures abound with similar texts exalting knowledge as the highest goodness. The dividend from knowledge, say these texts, is personal immortality. Samaveda describes knowledge as the most auspicious wealth. The text reads: Hey Sathakratho, if you kind as you are, desire to bestow happiness on us, please let us be gifted with the most auspicious wealth of gnanam. Badarayanan says the purpose of man is effected through the mere knowledge of Brahman. Bhagavad Gita attributes knowledge to goodness. Sankarachatya adds: Knowledge is in reality an attribute of the guna of goodness. According to Mundaka Upanishad, knowledge is even potent over the gene. The text reads: Anyone who knows the supreme Brahman becomes Brahman indeed. In his kula is not born anyone who does not know Brahman. He overcomes grief, and rises above aberrations; and becoming freed from the knots of the heart, he attains immortality. Instead of through gnanam, christians hope to get immortality through blind belief in Lucifer, the artificer of fraud. But it is hopeless even according to his own book. The christian god professedly had also installed a tree of immortality in the garden. Unlike the tree of gnanam,

its fruit was seemingly rendered open to man. Driven by compassion towards these aarthas (victims) of Lucifer, Sivan invests them with correct gnanam. Sivan is characterised at this point in the christian bible as a mere serpent, it being his distinctive ornament. His regular appellation of aadi seshan is however used at the end of the book. Here the christian god suffocates Sivan after calling him the devil and Satan in a vain effort to brand him with his own marks. Before they could apply the knowledge received, the so-called Adam and Eve were turned out of the garden. The christian god says to himself that now that they have knowledge, they would lift their hands and pluck and eat from the free of immortality as well and live forever. This should not be, says he in accord with his swabhavam as mans supreme enemy. The writer John belongs to the immediate circle of followers of the christian godalias Luciferas transformed into jesus. He gets a vision of the same tree as it stood after the termination of historical christianity. The vision is recorded in the very last part of the christian bible. John found the fruit of the tree of immortality was still atop. The tree had not dropped it even after christianity had run its flu course of professed redemption of man from mortality. John wrote: On either side of the river, mid-way along the city street, grows the tree that gives life, bearing its fruit twelvefold. We began this paper with Sri Krishna and might also conclude it likewise. As we observed, Krishna is deeply conscious of Kaliyuga and its overhanging consequences for man. At the end of the Mahabharatha battle, Sri Krishna attained swargaarohanam. According to Markandeyapurana he identified Lucifer, alias jesus, even in swargaloka as the impendent man of sin. Touched by the woes with which mankind was soon to be overwhelmed on account of man of sin, Krishna addressed him thus, in words captured from human lime: Begone, wretched being, begone! Thy reign is over. Till now thou hast been the tormentor of mankind. Glossary Aadi Seshan: name of Sivan. Literally serpent of the primal age Aaptha vakyam: a brief ethical pronouncement Ajnanam: wrong knowledge Akaarpanyam: absence of niggardliness Anasooya: absence of envy Anayaasam: facility Asathyam: untruthfulness Asaucham: rebellion against hygiene Aspruha: absence of covetousness Asura: an ex-devan Avivekam: lack of discrimination Bhoodadaya: compassion Bhur : a synonym for earth Brahman: the impersonal absolute Brahmav: the absolute as creation deity Deva: one who has divinity Dharma: goodness supreme Guna: positive attribute Guru: preceptor

Jeevan mukta: a person who is liberated while still alive Kali: anger Kinkara: an underling Kshama: toleration Kula: family line Lakshana: mark Mangalam: benediction Manthram: a Vedic incantation Paapam: transgression Paataala-loka: subterranean world Pisach: devil, infernal being Pisachadharma-panchakam : the five distinctive characteristics of pisach or devil Paisacha vivaham: fornication by the devil Punyahhoomi: land sacred Rabhas: rage Rishi: inspired Vedic sage Saadhakan: practitioner Saadhu: a Hindu sage Saasthra: any Hindu system of knowledge Sathya yuga: age of truthfulness Saucham : hygiene Shanthi manthram : valedictory part of a Vedic hymn Sishya: pupil Swabhavam: natural propensity Swargaarohanam: ascent to heavenly world Yuga: an age of the world

Part II A Review in Kesari weekly by Editor-in-Chief T.R. Somasekharan

Jesus is incarnation of devil. The bible is devils scripturea counterfeit of Easwaras (Easwara: the Sanskrit concept of personal godEd.) scripture. This is what Leo Panakal and Vinodh Kumar have established in The Key to the bible by identifying key terms in the old and new testaments and by analysing their etyma. Easwara offers knowledge so as to bring man to him. The bible on the contrary portrays as devil the one who taught man how he can become Easwara by discriminating between good and evil. The biblical god bans knowledge. He strives to keep man fettered for ever in the chain of darkness of ignorance. The biblical god therefore is devil. The bible threatens man with destruction of his specie if he acquires knowledge. Annihilation of mankind involves annihilation of the gene of reflection which is the material cause of the existence of the specie. The christian religion actually aims at destruction of this gene. To bury the humankind in superstition, to turn man whom the Vedas describe as perpetually sinless, into a sin-rooted being, to implant the gene of sin in the human race these are the concerns of the devil in his bible and in his works. The devil is conspicuous in the bible as Lucifer. Lucifer is also called morning star. 1 am the bright morning star, jesus has said in declaration of his identity. The gods command to angels, at the time of creation of man, to worship man turned Lucifer into a revenger against the human race. Assembling the lower devils in the nether world, Lucifer readies his stratagem for liquidation of the human race. Original sin only subsists in tins Lucifer and not in Adam when he ate the fruit of the tree of knowledge. All sin had its origin in that abominable assembly, says Mary of Agreda in her revelations. Adam has two sons named Cain and Abel. Eve informs Cain that his true father is Lucifer. Lucifer killed Abel. Displaying the body of Abel, he makes Cain admit to the murder after effectively telling him that it was he (Cain) who committed it. Thus was guilt (sin) set up in the mind of man. (After christianity began, the old testament texts were altered to make it appear as though Cain perhaps did the crime. But this is impossible to prove from any text.) To diffuse the gene of sin in the human race, Lucifer carried out reproduction in human femalesIsaac from Abrahams wife Sara, John baptist from Zacharias wife Elizabeth and jesus from Mary who is already betrothed to Joseph. Christians themselves assert that jesus birth was devoid of placenta. Jesus words I and my father are one, confirm that he is indeed Lucifers incarnation. After having thus transmitted sin and its gene to man, a religion was also started to diffuse sin culture. The doings of this religion in world history entirely correspond with the manifesto of Lucifer as revealed to Mazy of Agreda : We will subject the human creatures to our influence in order to destroy them. I will sow new sects and errors and set up new laws contrary to the highest laws. I will raise up from among them false prophets and leaders who will spread these doctrines. I will afflict the poor, oppress the suffering and persecute the meek. I will sow discord, excite wars and stir up nations against each other. I will raise up proud and arrogant men to extend the dominion of sin; and after they have executed my designs. I will bury them in this eternal fire, with so much the greater torments the more faithfully they

have followed me. This is my kingdom end this is the reward I give to those who follow me. The stratagem of Lucifer has been defined without any room for misgiving: Pretend to love men in order to destroy them; serve them in order to deceive them and to ruin them; help them in order to pervert them. It is this Lucifer the race destroyer that christianity flaunts as saviour. The authors definitely say that christianitys kingdom of god is the same as Lucifers eternal hell. The christian sin is not to be found in man. The christian sin is imaginary. For that reason redemption from christian sin is impossible. Jesus is false redeemer. No one gets salvation by way of jesus. As adversary .1 true salvation (moksha) christianity is a pseudo-religionthe enemy of religion. Hence Jesus and christianity are enemies of man. It is for this reason that christianity insists that the church alone interpret the bible. In tune with Lucifers tenets, all pursuits of knowledge by man were branded as sin and scientists persecuted and killed. The assaults against civilisation and pogroms against mankind committed throughout the world by christians constitute the work of Lucifer through them. The fact ii that world history no less than the bible reveals the true essence of jesus and christianity. The Key to the bible is essential reading for everyone who longs for the rescue of civilisation and mankind. The book is the fist of a series of four books on the same theme. The second work in the series has also been published. -0[The above review of the Ancient Mother volumes appeared in the April issue of the weekly Kesari. The reviewer is editor-in-chief T.R.Somasekharan who signed the article with the by-line T.R.S. It was featured to occupy nearly a full page of the eminent journal which circulates all over India and outside. In the middle of the page was displayed the front cover of the Ancient Mother series. Also featured were two boxes with the following text in bold characters from the pen of T.R.S: Pretend to love men in order to destroy them; serve them in order to deceive them and to rum them; help them in order to pervert them. This is the luciferian stratagem of christianity; it is Lucifer the race destroyer that christianity parades as saviour. Its kingdom of god is the eternal hell of Lucifer.]

Part III Comments from Browsers on the Internet

Sender:Aquarius Until two weeks ago I could only dare to hope that some one else existed who had received this revelation about jesus. I came across Ancient Mother I & II while reviewing a search on, of course, Lucifer. I was shocked, I mean truly, I was not the only one seemingly cursed with this knowledge. Perhaps hundreds, even thousands are aware of this and understand it. I only briefly browsed through each article. I would like to share my impression with you. First, we agree on the following: The key to understanding the bible is knowing. I already knew the identity of jesus when I came across the excerpts to your series on the Internet. I was doing research for my own article that I intend to write and make available. I need some one who is able to discuss this objectively and advise on presentati4 ii. Until now, I never thought it was possible. Please allow me to present what I refer to as the Paradox of Truth and the Key to Understanding the bible. * Sender: James Mayes and Tony Baker Question Who does jesus say he is? Answer: I jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I am the root and offspring of David, and the bright and morning star. (revelation 22:16) Question : Who is Isaiah telling about? Hew art thou fallen from heaven, 0 Lucifer, son of the morning: how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations: For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend to heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of god: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north: I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High. (Isaiah 14:12-14) Answer: Strongs Exhaustive Concordance, Hebrew (1996), heylel, the morning star. Question: Answer: Who then are the true worshippers of Lucifer? Christians. * *

jesus the christ = the Morning Star Lucifer = the Morning Star You figure it out. * * *

Sender : Acolyte I found your page quite fascinating. OK, assuming you are correct, Lucifer is jesus. Then who is really god? Sivan? And, who is Sivan? Are you stating that the bible is a role-reversal scam perpetrated by Lucifer? Or, that the old testament is ok, but the new testament is false? Or is the whole bible wackedout? Is there another text that is from god? Is there a Sivan bible? Or is there no word of god out there for us? And if not, why? I am sure there are many other people that are intrigued at the onset of your site but soon become lost trying to sort it out. Who is your god? Id love to hear back from you. * Sender: Fitz Larsen You are interesting. Maybe you have read the bible. If you have then we can have an interesting discussion. Let me know. * Sender: Scott Ashmore * * * *

This book is straight out of hell. Please repent. [The terms hell and repent are to be read in the light of the role-reversal scam mentioned above by Acolyte. -Ed.] * * *

Part IV Objections and Answers

Objection 1 Why are you so particular to prove that jesus is Lucifer? Answer That jesus is Lucifer is the reality. This reality is sought to be undermined by the contrary claims of jesus and his so-called church that jesus is god or perfection of goodness. It is then necessary, even wholesome, to underline the reality by demonstrating it a fact. It is uncontested that Lucifer is the fallen rebel archangel and devil supreme. He is further defined, uncontestedly again, as one who affects to be a god after having lost that status. According to yet another christian tradition, Lucifer is the father of lies. All these various definitions converge on jesus and jesus alone, either in his historical manifestation in that title or in his neoclassical form as found prominently in the so-called old testament. The clinching evidence concerning jesus identity is apprehended in the episode of the assassination of Abel. (See below.) From incontestable internal evidence in the bible itself, we demonstrate, firstly, that Cain is not the assassin, secondly, that the so-called jehovah is the one that committed the crime in reality, and lastly that jesus is the same being as this jehovah by virtue of the fact that he is privy to the exact site of the deed of assassination, a secret known only to jehovah. Moreover, jesus utters a lie while pattering on the site in the so-called new testament. This lie while palpable is still rebellious. This demonstrates him, more than everything else, as the identical being as Lucifer. The Assassination Episode Zacharias, son of Johiada, was killed. However, jesus says Zacharias, son of Barachias, was killed. Barachias, son of Barachias, was not killed; he died a natural death. Jesus lied therefore when saying that Barachias son Zacharias was the one killed. In the same statement jesus also referred self-consciously to the assassination of Abel. He went on to charge man with the crime. However, the exact site of the assassination deed between the altar and the houseis known to jesus. The site is known alone to jesus. (This in Luke.) In the same statement as found in Matthew, jesus avoids the site of Abels assassination, but gives instead the separate site of the killing of Johiadas son Zachariasbetween the temple and the altarshifting it at the same time to Barachias son Zacharias. who however had a natural death. Jesus utterances involve a willful twisting and transportation of evidence. He also rebelliously reveals the evidence constituting himself the assassin of Abel, viz, the exclusive data of the site of the assassination deed. In short, jesus reactions correspond to what one would naturally anticipate from a

murderer of Abel who is also at the same time a rebel unto himself [The topic is treated at greater length at ch.VlI, Ancient Mother I and p. 89, Ancient Mother II.] Objection 2 Is the bible authored by a group that was bent on toppling the natural process of the world? Answer The bible is authored by Lucifer alias jehovah. Yes, its aim is the toppling of the natural process, which incidentally is also a Hindu process. But it is written up by the fingers of men who are in varying degrees of possession by Lucifer the devil supreme. In this respect Moses tops over all the other proclaimed authors of the bible. The proclaimed authors are many in number. They lived at times far apart from each other over a span totaling 1500 years. However, their writings echo and exude a common substratum. This running substratum is the unnatural entity called Sin. However, there is no scriptural support for such a capitalised sin in any scripture other than the christian bible. On the contrary, the Sanskrit scriptures, which are earlier in origin, only acknowledge the entity of paapam. It is defined as actual unrighteous acts between man and man. This is part of the system. Further, it is perennially subject to destruction by Sivan. The substratum comprising the unheralded entity of Sin shows the christian bible a composition of Lucifera christian and the first suchexpressing himself through the medium of its proclaimed authors. For, christian tradition realistically but unwittingly ascribes origin of Sin to Lucifer. According to Mary of Agreda, acknowledged spokesperson of this tradition through her firsthand perception, all Sin had its origin in Lucifer in his council held in paathalalokam immediately after his fall. However, the full truth is to be found in the Hindu scriptures. They state realistically that Lucifer, known differently as narakaasuran in the Hindu texts, dropped to paathalalokam by failure to hold Dharma when the concept of Man first arose in consciousness in swargalokam. This failure constitutes the real original Sin. The bible and christians generally transpose this Sin to man in order firstly to shield Lucifer in his latter day nomenclature as jesus, secondly to exalt him, fraudulently, as mans redeemer, and thirdly to destroy man himself by installing an irredeemable guilt in his consciousness. * Objection 3 How are we going to offer proof for the malicious intention of the author of the bible? Answer The words of jehovah that guilt will lie at mans door articulate his malice. By definition guilt is a feeling of culpability for imagined offences. Jehovah seeks to inject such a feeling in man. Since this engineered feeling is concerned with an imaginary offence, it is beyond * *

redemption. The effort towards setting up such an irredeemable guilt in man affirms jehovahs malice. Contextually, the imaginary offence concerns the assassination of Abel. In reality Abel was only assassinated by jehovah. But the corpse was symbolically flaunted before Cain who had been induced earlier by the same jehovah to assault Abel. Confronted by the corpse, Cain now admits himself to the guilt, otherwise called sin, for the death of Abel by homicide by jehovah. * Objection 4 Why do you say that jesus is devil. If you were to do a case study on Beelzebub, Lucifer and all other names of devil, and jesus with all his names you see that they never coincide. They are two separate individuals. I am curious to know how you came to believe that jesus is his enemy Satan. Answer Both Lucifer and Beelzebub are devils indeed in the broad sense. But they are not entirely identical. Lucifer is distinct fro Beelzebub in his special characteristic of rebellion. Although both belong to the same genetic class of devils or fallen angels, Beelzebub is not a rebel. Lucifer is the only devil who rebelled against incorporation of the angels self-made fill, and set up christianity. Christian tradition is incapable of absorbing the distinction between Lucifer and Beelzebub. The reason is that it is centered on jesus. Being the alter ego of Lucifer the rebel, jesus operates under an acquired cover of goodness. Christian tradition is thus compelled to treat Lucifer also as a mere devil or satan. In reality he is devil supreme. Malinformed as it is about jesus real identity as Lucifer christian tradition and mystical literature become a source of first-hand information on Lucifer. It is this literature that furnishes Lucifers sermon at his post-fall council as the archetype of jesus sermon on mount. In this tradition Lucifer is defined as one who affects to be god after having lost that status. The christian bible is this affectation embodied in words and episodes. Rebel that he is, jesus openly announces his true identity as morning star, or in other words Lucifer, at the end of the christian bible. * Objection 5 I think that you go too far in saying that the christian god is an enemy of man. Answer The christian god is mans enemy for the reason that he deceived man concerning the way to immortality. To acquire immortality it is essential to have knowledge in the first place. This is eventually admitted by the god. But it is exactly this knowledge that he foreclosed to man * * * *

as deadly. Of the two trees in the so-called garden, the fruit of the tree of immortality is declared open to man. The fruit of the tree of knowledge is banned as deadly. At the timely intervention of the serpent and the womans bold initiative, man does eat the fruit. The god now admits that man now, i.e., in the aftermath of knowledge. will lift his hand and pluck and eat the fruit of the tree of immortality also and live for ever. So, i.e., for that reason, he turns both man and woman out and posts aimed guard so that man could reach the tree of life no longer. Historical christianity professedly came into being just so that the garden may be reopened. This allegedly came to pass at the moment jesus got himself killed. John gets a vision of the tree of immortality as it stood at the dissolution of christianity. He found its fruit was still atop on the tree. The christian god by his original statement that all fruits in the garden except that of the tree of knowledge were available to man for the eating was in fact deceiving him. The fruit of the tree of immortality would have remained atop for ever, beyond mans reach until he knows it is to be gained by effortful plucking, which knowledge is made impossible by the ban on knowledge. Had man obeyed him he would not have had knowledge nor would he have had immortality. The reason is that immortality is the outcome of knowledge which, once again, the christian god already before had banned as deadly. Therefore, the christian god is mans enemy and the serpent his benefactor. The serpent who is Sivan symbolised, is responsible for the turn of events that culminated in overthrow of the underived fraud against man devised by the christian god. * Objection 6 All faiths are one faith. All religions are one religion. They all tie one to another in unity of their faith. Answer In its diabolical doctrine of original sin by man christianity stands all alone. The benighted concept is not to be seen in other systems. The reason is that the real original sinner is the christian god himself. Historical christianity was set up by him just in order to transmit his original sin on to man so that the specie is liquidated. Christianity expressly damns all other systems. Says jesus, the be-all and end-all of christianity: He that believeth and is baptised shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned (Mark. ch. 16, sentence 16). Compare it with this text from the earlier Hindu systems: Let there be happiness for everyone in this world. 0Epilogue Impotence of the omnipotent Christian assumption of omnipotence in the biblical god is not warranted by their own * *

texts. These show that god is in fact a mechanical slave of the gene and not its maker as christianity holds forth. This situation of god as a mere agent of genetic laws is evident from the third chapter of the pages ascribed to Luke under enumeration 23-38 in the bible. Any geneticist trying to clone a gene of his choice must be prepared for unwanted genes coming along in the process. Although unwanted they are unavoidable landmarks in the process of creation of the gene of his preference. Success is just possible at the fourth generation, increasingly so at the 7th and 28th generations and assured at the 77th. In Lukes enumeration we encounter the prescribed total of 77 genes of which only a few including two intermittent jesus genes separated by the inevitable 28 generations, have any function to fulfill. (The two-time jesus gene knocks out the christian claim that jesus is a one-time happening) The rest are redundant but unavoidable in the overriding laws of genetics, which bind the god. The laws of genetics are the same for plants, animals, humans and gods. The biblical god clearly belongs to the last categoryone of a multitude as irresistibly admitted by him at ch. 3, sentence 22 in the opening work of the bible book. The efforts of geniuses turned out by the gene in its puttering process are responsible for the progressive upgrading of human existence that is a feature of history. The establishment known as the church has been at work all along to undermine this upgradation lest the omnipotent be endangered. Human cloning is the most significant achievement of man in all history since it redeems him from fear of death. Christianity s angry campaign against it from Day One should be viewed in the general perspective of its record vis--vis human betterment. -0Postscript The Root Cause of Social Problems The existence of christianity is the root cause of all social problems. Humanist scholars like Peter Brown have studied christianity in the background of earlier value systems that it uprooted. Brown shows how the earlier societies eminently fitted in, and contributed to, the calm order of the universe which he has unearthed as the complexion of the time. The identity of a person was perceived as sharing in. and contributing to this order. Brown notes the profound change that took place with the rise of christianity in this sense of the stability of mans identity Browns words on the christian breaching of the established map of the universe bear repetition. He speaks of the darkness spoken of in the ancient texts in which all ancient landmarks would be blotted out. He speaks too of the final death of cultures that had existed since prehistory. By the sixth century, the only major settled civilisations that maintained a paganism (read purism) reaching back without dislocation to the preclassical world, west of India and east of Ireland, were the Zoroastrian culture of Sassanian Iran: elsewhere, in Egypt, in Mesopotamia, in Anatolia and in western Europe, the ancient preclassical world had come to a definitive end. India alone survived the holocaust virtually intact and it continues so to this day. As for Ireland, it did not long survive. Brown adds that the rise of christianity was met by deep religious anger by the societies of the time. Our own work in the Society of Friends of the Ancient Mother and by way of Identity

Publishers is centrally concerned with tracing of this sabotage to its first or genetic cause. Bringing this cause to consciousness through identification from the present general blackout will make for its undoing. On the first cause of social problems, our book The Key to the bible has this to say: The genes of murder, war-making, adultery and theft are all genes subsequently interpolated into consciousness and then deliberately brought within the sphere of the attributed acts of man described in the bible bookattributed to man by rebellious commandments proffered after the eventturning the human psyche in the process into a battlefield between the genes thus implanted therein with all their automotive drives and the commandments subsequently planted against the selfsame genes, both being done by the same being, viz., jehovah, alias Lucifer, alias jesus, whom Moses in his goodness as man takes to be god, the perfection of goodness, as continuedly professed by that being in execution of his rebellion. Of all Jewish writers Isaiah correctly traces the ills of human society to Lucifer by name. In words that become intelligible now under light of the identity, Isaiah speaks also of societys final triumph over the same ills with the fall of Lucifer and his empire that once shook the world.

The Ancient Mother Treatises and its Author

In the Words of M.C. Menon The twin volumes in the series Ancient Mother, The Key to the bible and The Judgement on christianity are a learned treatise on the bible from a rare and totally unexpected angle and the authors intrepid and essentially honest and facts-backed views are startlingly novel and heretic in the extreme. His findings are backed by quotations from the vulgate and not from the controversial acts of the episcopal establishment like the Star Chamber, the burning of Joan of Arc or the atrocious killings initiated by Mary I and Elizabeth I. His revolutionary findings are: 1. Jesus is the incarnation of Lucifer, the devil masquerading as god to bring about the liquidation of mankind; 2. Lucifer was instrumental in the genetic transfer of his essence into the womb of Mary and was born from her as jesus; 3. jesus teachings are diabolical essays in double entendre to disguise his real identity; 4. the so-called god that ousted Adam and Eve from the garden of Eden for partaking of the forbidden fruit of the tree of knowledge was actually lucifer; 5. that it was Ardhanareeswara Sivan the supreme god belonging to the Hindu Trimurti who assuming the guise of his symbolic ornament of the serpent hastened to the rescue of mankind with his advice to Eve to partake of the fruits of the tree of knowledge and the tree of immortality against the express taboo of Lucifer; 6. that it was Lucifer, the impostor that killed Abel, foisted the crime on Cain, and thus engineered into the human collective unconscious the idea of original sin from which damning concept Hinduism is free; 7. that mankinds true benefactor is the Hindu god Siva; 8. that christianity is at the root of all the worlds evils and is an infernal pest that should be eradicated in toto for mankinds survival. Some of the views of the author may at first sound extremely controversial, but he has succeeded in proving hi; points irrevocably from the vulgate itself and deserves a dispassionate hearing, Unfortunately, due no doubt to the abstruse nature of the subject treat4 his esoteric arguments have no way of reaching down to the level of the common man and have therefore

remained the exclusive preserve of the highly learned specialist circles. It is however certain to raise a hornets nest when brought down to the ken of ordinary people. But organisations like the Birla Foundation that are in indefatigable search of excellence in literature can surely give it the publicly it sorely lacks by its recognition. After all, a society known for its catholicity and universal tolerance, which can allow a Charvaka and an Adi Sankaracharya the same unshackled freedom of faith and utterance, can certainly recognise the intrinsic intrepidity behind the work and bring it to public attention and dispassionate study. In my opinion the award of the Saraswati Samman (official title of the outstanding book award of K.K.Birla Foundation, New DelhiEd.) will eminently fill the need. A born christian, the authors deep knowledge of the Hindu mythology and scripture and his uncanny facility to give them the right interpretation is astounding. It is his firm conviction that Hinduism is the oldest and the only spiritual guide for humanity and the diabolically oriented christian faith is just the reverse. The Samman is sought for this work, not for the veracity or irrevocability of its findings, but for the excellence of the treatise and the noble intrepidity of the author. About the Author: Mr. Leo Panakal, the stormy petrel of apostasy, was born in Cochin, Kerala, in 1931. During his college days he was ever in the forefront of agitation and rebellion and was in conflict with the die-hard clericals who ran the establishment. When the same establishment turned zealous worshippers at the temple of independence winners, Mr. Leo revolted at the bankruptcy of principle in the establishment and left the college in disgust. He passed the degree examination by his own efforts and joined the Reuters, and he was for a time one of their staff correspondents in New Delhi. Later he returned to Kerala, edited a journal and finally started INSIGHT to give expression to his innate Hinduism. The journal was shifted to Switzerland owing to the open hostility displayed by the establishment. It was from Switzerland that the two books were published, and he is following up with more works in the Ancient Mother series.

Padre finds christianity an entirely false construct

[Globe News Service (GNS) has issued a report from Helsinki on a notable, book by a Finnish padre. The following is from Indian Express of Apr. 22 (1998) which featured the report prominently on its foreign news page.]

Helsinki, Apr. 21: A leading padre of Lutheran church has declared that hell does not exist and everyone will end up in heaven anyway (as affirmed by Hindu sasthra and as elaborated in the Ancient Mother treatisesEd.). It is an entirely false construct, said Antti Kylliainen, a Helsinki padre and author of a book on christianity. Fire, brimstone and eternal tormentthey are all part of the same myth, he went on. Another Finnish padre, Olli Arola, told a newspaper at the same time that jesus was in all probability married to Mary Magdalene. The immaculate conception and virgin birth are

highly unlikely to have ever happened, he said further. 0

Appendix
[The following pages feature the text of a request for grant we sent some time ago to the Templeton Foundation. The appeal was prepared in accordance with guidelines set by the Foundation. It is reproduced here for its societal perceptions and for certain complexions of the identity riot covered in the Preview proper.] We seek the grant for the work of this Society of Friends of the Ancient Mother and its sister concern, Identity Publishers. We are a non-profit group functioning since 1991 in Switzerland and since 1993 also in India. Our overall objective is the freeing of human societies from organised religion. In furtherance of this objective we operate specifically to undo christianity, which is the epidemial organised religion. The precise field of our activity would consequently narrow down to the correct identification of the source-being of christianity, viz., jesus, uterine son of Mary. This makes our work different from all other comparable efforts since the upcoming of christianity. The existence of christianity is the root cause of alt of human societys problems. It is this fact that causes us to recapture the being that is the source of christianity in his true identity. Our probe from internal and external sources conclusively identifies the source-being of historical christianity as the alter ego of Lucifer. He articulates himself now in an acquired language of human goodness. This being and the establishment he set up by way of his principal ally and presently continuing in the Rome pope is the real and hitherto unknown cause of the ills of society. In short, the son of man is in reality the son of Lucifer, the very being that has set himself the confident goal of destroying this race of men by pretending to serve it. We the applicants have been working publicly for the past 10 years in exposure of this identity. To begin with we operated as a conversation Ashram on the identity in Cochin (in Kerala, India). In 1990 we moved to Switzerland. There in October was published our theoretical journal INSIGHT. It demonstrates the identity in 60 copious pages. Later on we began serial publication of the identity in book form. We constituted ourselves for this purpose a legal society under Swiss laws named as Identity Publishers. Under the aegis of Identity Publishers the initial two tomes in the series have been published already although in a limited edition meant mainly for scholars. These are The Key to the bible and The Judgement on christianity. More works in the same series are planned in the project now before you. We have also published a simplified preview of the series with a specific section of objections and answers. Detailed perusal of the identification system in our books led to the following observation published by the editor-in-chief of the eminent Keralan weekly Kesari For everyone who longs for the rescue of civilisation and mankind these books are essential reading. Vantage Press (New York) commented the books were scholarly and closely reasoned. The international journal Hinduism Today as well as the office of the president of Israel also sent in notes of assent in respect of the identification.

Root Cause of Social Problems

The existence of christianity is the root cause of all social problems. Humanist scholars like Peter Brown have studied christianity in the background of earlier value systems that it uprooted. Brown shows how the earlier societies eminently fitted in, and contributed to, the calm order of the universe which he has unearthed as the complexion of the time. The identity of a person was perceived as sharing in, and contributing to, this order. Brown notes the profound change that took place with the rise of christianity in this sense of the stability of mans identity. Browns words on the christian breaching of the established map of the universe bear repetition. He speaks of the darkness spoken of in the ancient texts in which all ancient landmarks would be blotted out. He speaks too of the final death of cultures that had existed since prehistory. By the sixth century, the only major settled civilisations that maintained a paganism [purism] reaching back without dislocation to the preclassical world, west of India and east of Ireland, was the Zoroastrian culture of Sassanian Iran: elsewhere, in Egypt, in Mesopotamia, in Anatolia and in western Europe, the ancient preclassical world had come to a definitive end. India alone survived the depredation virtually intact and it continues so to this day. As for Ireland, it did not long survive. Brown adds that the rise of christianity was met by deep religious anger by the societies of the time. Our own work is centrally concerned with tracing of this sabotage to its first or genetic cause. Bringing this cause to consciousness through identification from the present general blackout will make for its undoing. On this point of the first cause of social problems we would rather cite an extended passage from our own book The Key to the bible: The genes of murder, war-making, adultery and theft are all genes subsequently interpolated into consciousness and then deliberately brought within the sphere of the attributed acts of man described in the bookattributed to man by rebellious commandments proffered after the eventturning the human psyche in the process into a battlefield between the genes thus implanted therein with all their automotive drives and the commandments subsequently planted against the selfsame genes, both being done by the same being, viz., Jehovah, alias Lucifer, alias Jesus, whom Moses in his goodness as man takes to be god, the perfection of goodness, as continuedly professed by that being in execution of his rebellion. Of all Jewish writers Isaiah correctly traces the ills of human society to Lucifer by name. In words that become intelligible under light of the identity, Isaiah speaks also of societys final triumph over the same ills with the fall of Lucifer and his empire that once shook the world.

THE PROJECT
Our present project has come out of new perceptions since publication of the identity. New data has also become available in the recent past, especially in the genetics of cloning. [The statement bears on the epoch before discovery of the human genome codeEd.) All this new data and experience while underlining the original identity in every respect at the same time

expands, strengthens and seals it. The project envisages a new treatise on the identity incorporating the salient points of the works so far published in a single volume. At the same time this new popular volume will update itself with data that accrued since that time. Lastly, the new volume will be so organised in its preparation as to be easily accessible to one and all in respect of both content and formulation. This proposed work should be projected worldwide and more particularly in audiences, institutions and territories that are or have been marked targets of the christian affectation. It should be made available most numerously in English and largely in French, Dutch, Italian, German, Spanish and Portuguese translationsin addition to those in the ethnic languages of India. These translations should be constantly monitored for the utmost accuracy with the original by chosen experts. We as originators and applicants will be responsible for compiling and publishing the original in addition to organising and supervising the translations. The projected new edition of the identity would be tabled, argued and defended by us before the world media, both visual and print, in the same proportion as the christian establishment has been doing for long. From the weight of the evidence, the present servility of the media in regard to what it publishes as the christ and what in truth is Lucifer should and would become a thing of the past. All of this work would be undertaken at the present locations in Switzerland and India making use of the most modem communication advantages. In India the location is at Cochin, a settlement from where popish christianity managed to breed in the East. The outlying Keralan land is now a simmering hotbed of global clericalism and nunnery, the same as Europe was in the middle ages. The projected new volume will encompass all the latest advances of knowledge particularly in the science of genetics since the time the existing books were composed. This new volume along with our other works as listed will he tendered as the conclusive documents against christianity in a contemplated process for its legal eradication as a criminal fraud against humanity. This process will be framed and filed by us in the aptest judicial forum in a chosen country. The Rome pope will be cited as chief defendant. As this will be our definitive move against Christianity as the source of all evil, we would like to go into it in some detail. Let us begin with the present stage of the projected full-fledged trial. We are referring to an existing verdict exonerating Cain of the murder of Abel. Such a verdict was handed by 4 to 3 judges on the basis of a comprehensive trial of Cain by a mock court in Venice in 1988 and reported worldwide by the media. The mock trial was devoid of jurisdiction but otherwise scrupulously administered, with participation of magistrates, criminologists, prosecution and defense counsels, witnesses, etc. The christian establishment has consistently vilified Cain before successive generations of mankind as the first exemplar of the christian, original sin. This will be particularly exposed in the legal process as the archetype of all cover-up operations. The question as to who actually assassinated Abel was not addressed as such by the mock

court. This will be a major concern of the projected comprehensive trial of christianity. The evidence against the Christian god as the real assassin is already conclusively set out at several places in our existing titles, but most elaborately in the chapter Assassination of Abel: The Site Configuration and jesus Conviction in our present volume The Key to the bible. The right moment for the projected frontal prosecution of Christianity is when the identity has been thoroughly and widely aired through the projected popular volume and translations. We expect those who defended Cain at Venice to come forward and join with us in the frontal prosecution. They as well as other legal luminaries picked for their concern over human society will be empanelled for working with us in framing and pursuing this lawsuit of the millennium. We now proceed with a birds-eye view of the projected lawsuit. Religion and guilt are defined respectively as pursuit of perfection of goodness and feeling of culpability over imagined offences. For the reason that the christian god applies suggestion upon Cain to go and kill Abel he is straightaway demonstrated to be the antithesis of the definition. Since Abel admittedly propitiated him to the exclusion of Cain, he is further identified as Lucifer from the latters avowed attribute of especial infliction of his die-hard servitors. The projection of such an entity before generations of mankind as its redeemer and embezzlement of incalculable quantities of its wealth in the process is but the ultimate in fraud. The Christian sin from which the supposed redemption is proffered is actually admitted by their own texts as an identical counterpart of guilt. There is sin CROUCHING at your entrance, says the Christian god to man in Cain in words that seek novelly to deploy it from inertia in his own (Christian gods own) self. There is GUILT CROUCHING at your entrance, says he in another affirmation of the selfsame text (genesis 4,7). As guilt is irredeemable because imagined, so is its inescapable counterpart of Christian sin irredeemable. The entire Christian exercise from its inception to termination is thus a fraud consciously undertaken at the expense of, and for the liquidation of, man in his innocence and goodness by way of an irredeemable sin/guilt For this reason, it should be made the subject matter of a judicial investigation for the survival of man, his truth, his justice, which after all is the overriding concern of law.

CONCLUSION SYSTEMIC REVOLUTION

The systemic change that will occur in the wake of our work as it proceeds and fructifies will be fundamental in naturea Change of perception. As a result the present compartmentalization of mankind as East and West will give way to a correct vision of mankind as one in all essential respects. Christianity is responsible for the arrest and arrogation of this original vision. Going beyond the measured-out undoing of christianity, Isaiah has indeed detailed the coming systemic revolution. The pre-christian scriptures on the other hand expressly

promote the same revolution when avowing their own spontaneous fadeout after the exoteric liquidation of christianity.

SUMMARY OF OBJECTIVES
The final termination of organised religion constitutes the goal of our twin organisations. Christianity is the germinal organised religion. Termination of christianity by correct knowledge of its identity will bring about the liberation of mankind as a whole from organised religion and consequent darkness of consciousness and resource loss of every kind.

SUMMARY OF PROJECT
The primary part of the project is a new, popular, comprehensive volume prepared for the general public in English and translations in many languages. Making use of all standard channels and other necessary means, the work will be promoted worldwide through bookshops, media coverage and other instrumentalities. The projected judicial process will follow in the aftermath of the primary project as its automatic second stage. 2001 o