Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
'bbS
oll
21 (1)
tLAL
Ml M2 M3
Iin
Thus, CTR can be controlled by the designer.
However, the ideal conditions do not exist
and errors are introduced. There is a tradeoff Fig 3 Mulders CM
between output impedance (R0111) and output Here one can note that:
capacitance (CO,,,). Bigger size transistors 1. M3 and M4 will operate in triode region
achieve higher R0111, which is always desired if the input current is sufficiently less
for a CM. But there will be higher C0,,, than biasing current for M5.
associated with these bigger size transistors, 2. The structure may not be suitable for
which obviously degrades the frequency high frequency applications.
response of a current mirror (Fig. 4). The
simulated results show the input impedance Sub-threshold region CM
of 5300, while R0,,, was found to be 27kQ Simple CM (Fig. 1) can be operated in sub-
(for WIL=30). It may be seen that for smaller threshold region by selecting proper
WIL, CTR is not unity and depends upon the parameter as stipulated in previous
applied drain bias of transistor M2 (channel discussions. Since these current mirrors are
length modulation). The longer size operated at very low input currents, the trans-
transistors (large WIL) yield a CTR, which is conductance of the mirroring transistors is
very close to unity. The short channel effects very low and hence these structures are
also got reflected in the characteristics of the inherently low frequency structures. Though,
output port and can be seen by comparing these CM are not suitable for high frequency
them for low WIL transistors. applications they are too attractive for the
use in micro power op amps.
All the following CMs discussed have
saturated MOSFETs as mirroring transistors.
WI,L--3{ \\ VI. LEVEL SHIFTED CMS
Ramirez-Angulo Structure
,0 ,00
Frnquoeny in MH1z '0°0 '0000 A low voltage CMs based on level shifter
approach has been proposed by Ramirez-
Fig.4. Effect of transistor sizes on the Angulo for built-in current sensors in which
frequency response of the CM. 9 transistors were used. The bandwidth of the
circuit was few tens of MHz. Though the
m. M r lMI2 Mmel
VS
vsS
Structure 3: MIL Fig 7: Bulk-driven MOSFET based CM
VII. CONCLUSIONS
In this discussion we have presented
various possible CM structures along with
1F-
~ ~ ~ ~ their merits and demerits.
In-4LMI r,-m*
PM 0Sf,
I
REFERENCES
M1I
MW MIM
9
MI