Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Case # 1
The lawyer’s aim when he pulled back his total working capital from his
deductible. CICA does not define the term interest, the Supreme Court of
Canada defines interest as “the return for the use by one person of a sum of
the amount of money owed from the loan taken out by the lawyer in order to
replenish his capital would be considered. Interest expenses that are incurred
would appear that the interest created by the loan to replace the capital is
The fact that the lawyer has used capital from his company in order to
purchase a home is belief of what tax planning should be. CICA has seen it all
and has created provisions even for tax avoidance of this nature. If this were a
be common practice among the business world and it simply is not. The
calculates the interest that should have been paid on the mortgage amount at
a fair rate and the Lawyer will be responsible for this amount with taxes.
Another reason the lawyer could be sting by this transaction is the fact
The entire amount of the mortgage is used for personal purposes and thereby
to the lawyer’s notion is simply not interest free. The lawyer has already made
his mind and he might face a negative consequence at the end of the year if
So as you can see, this “tax saving” plot the lawyer has attempted to
play may seem to save taxes and interest in somewhat of a loophole but in
the long run it works out to costing more. CICA is constantly updating and
amending its practices. They have employees that are well versed in all areas
of the tax code, this way of saving taxes is simply too easy to make logical
sense. The lawyer should have known that this situation was simply too good
decision.
Case- 1
The lawyer’s intentions when he withdrew his entire capital account from his law firm
was to save on interest from taking out a mortgage, while being able to deduct the interest to
repay the bank loan because it is used to replenish capital and in essence produce income.
According to CICA Handbook expenses used to gain income are, in fact deductible.
CICA does not define the term interest, rather they use the determination of the Supreme Court
of Canada which defines interest as “the return or consideration or compensation for the use or
retention by one person of a sum of money, belonging to, in a colloquial sense, or owed to
another.” By definition the amount of monies owed from the loan taken out by the lawyer in
order to replenish his capital would be considered interest. Expenses that are incurred to earn
income are deductible under the CICA regulations. Because of this reasoning it would appear
that the interest created by the loan to replace the capital is fully deductible. This would be a
The fact that the lawyer has used capital from his company in order to purchase a home
is belief of what tax planning should be. CICA has seen it all and has created provisions even
for tax avoidance of this nature. If this were a completely acceptable practice it would be
common practice among the business world and it simply is not. The implications of mixing
business with personal affairs becomes very sticky in nature and appropriate policies needed to
be introduced in order to bring a general fairness to this policy. The practice of using capital in
imputed interest to combat this practice. Imputed interest is defined as interest considered to
be paid, even through no interest payment has been made. In essence CICA calculates the
interest that should have been paid on the mortgage amount at a fair rate and the Lawyer will
Another reason the lawyer could be burned by this transaction is the fact that he is, in
essence using company funds in order to finance his personal mortgage. Because this is not an
acceptable the lawyer will need to calculate a taxable benefit. The portion of the mortgage
100% that is used for personal purposes. The entire amount of the mortgage is used for
personal purposes and thereby the full amount will be added to the lawyer’s taxable income.
In closing, technically this bank loan expense is deductible. The mortgage, contrary to
the lawyer’s belief is simply not interest free. While the lawyer has attempted to take his tax
planning into his own hands he may have made a potentially toxic business decision. At year
end the lawyer could be surprised with a vary large tax bill that he has neither planned or saved
for.
So as you can see, this “tax saving” game the lawyer has attempted to play may seem to
save taxes and interest in somewhat of a loophole but in the long run it works out to costing
more. CICA is constantly updating and amending its practices. They have employees that are
well versed in all areas of the tax code, this way of saving taxes is simply too easy to make
logical sense. The lawyer should have known that this situation was simply too good to be true