Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Contents
0 Principle Foundations 0.0 Assumptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.1 Tools and Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.2 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Mathematical Foundations 1.0 History and Philosophy of Mathematics 1.1 Sets and Relations . . . . . . . . . . . 1.2 Functions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.3 Operations and Groups . . . . . . . . . 1.4 Building Arithmetic . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Logic 2.0 History and Use of Logic . 2.1 Foundation of Logic . . . . 2.2 Ways to Prove Something 2.2.1 Direct Proof . . . . 2.2.2 Indirect Proof . . . 2.2.3 Counter-Example . 2.3 Theories . . . . . . . . . . 2.4 Systems . . . . . . . . . . 3 The 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 16 16 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Theory of Everything (TOE) Story of TOEs Creation . . . . . . . Construction of the Theory . . . . . Physical Space . . . . . . . . . . . . Quasi-Abstract and Abstract Spaces Classication of Information . . . . . i
CONTENTS
ii
3.5 The Supernatural Realm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 4 God and Persons 4.0 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1 Persons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2 Theories About God . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2.1 God does not Exist . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2.2 God Exists . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.3 Proofs of Gods Existence . . . . . . . . . . . 4.4 The Story of God, the Point . . . . . . . . . . 4.5 Perspectives of God and Gods Relation to the . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . World . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 27 27 28 28 28 29 30 31
0.0
Assumptions
1. Let us assume that assumptions exist and that those listed in Section 0.0: Assumptions are true throughout the book. 2. Assume the assumptions in each section.
Denition 0.0.2: A chire is a base unit of writing (e.g., c, , , 3, etc.). Denition 0.0.3: A letter is a chire used to spell words (all units in the alphabet, if it exists). Denition 0.0.4: A word is an un-spaced string of letters that has a meaning. Denition 0.0.5: A symbol is a chire (other than a number) that has meaning. Assumption 2: Use of Words and Symbols
1. Assume the ability to use all words as dened in Websters Dictionary and in this book. (a) If a word is dened in a dierent manner in Logos, assume the Logos denition. 2. Assume (1)standard sentence structure in American English and (2)structure of words and symbols dened in Logos.
CHAPTER 0. PRINCIPLE FOUNDATIONS 3. Assume the symbols dened in the book. Assumption 3: Principle of Non-contradition
1. Given conditions X and Y , if X is true, then X (not X) is false; and if Y is true, then Y is false. Denition 0.0.6: An axiom is an assumption of the existence of X. Denition 0.0.7: Given X and Y are conditions, X implies Y means if X is satised, then so is Y , or Xs existence constitutes the existence of Y . This can be stated Y is an implication of X. Assumption 4: Logical Implications of Assumptions and Axioms 1. If an Axiom of a Theory asserts the existence of X and Y , we may assume that X and Y exist. Denition 0.0.8: A conjecture is a statement that can be proven true or false. Denition 0.0.9: A theorem is a conjecture logically implied by assumptions and axioms. Denition 0.0.10: A lemma is a theorem used to prove a part of the main theorem. Denition 0.0.11: A corollary is a theorem logically implied by the main theorem. Assumption 5: Logical Implications of Theorems 1. Given conditions {X, Y ,...} and given a conjecture, Z, if proven that X,Y ,... imply Z then when supplied with {X, Y ,...} we may automatically assume Z.
(a) This general theorem would read: Given X, Y ,... , Z, Let {X, Y ,...} then Z, If {X, Y ,...}, then Z, or {X, Y ,...} Z. 2. Given a theorem, W : {X, Y, ...} Z and a theorem A : Z B,there is a new theorem, C : {X, Y ,...} B
0.1
0.2
Introduction
1.0
1.1
10
1.2
Functions
11
1.3
12
1.4
Building Arithmetic
Chapter 2 Logic
13
CHAPTER 2. LOGIC
14
2.0
CHAPTER 2. LOGIC
15
2.1
Foundation of Logic
CHAPTER 2. LOGIC
16
2.2
2.2.1
Deduction Induction
2.2.2
Indirect Proof
2.2.3
Counter-Example
CHAPTER 2. LOGIC
17
2.3
Theories
CHAPTER 2. LOGIC
18
2.4
Systems
19
20
3.0
21
3.1
22
3.2
Physical Space
23
3.3
24
3.4
Classication of Information
25
3.5
26
27
4.0 4.1
Introduction Persons
28
4.2
4.2.1
Our existence is a process of haphazard occurrences. These occurrences stem from a source that spontaneously and haphazardly brought them about. But wait... That cant happen! For this source must have also been caused by a source. And this pre-existing source from which all sources stem would have to have spontaneously created them... meaning this source has either been programmed to function this way by itself or by some intentional system with the ability to program the source, which would imply a creative and intelligent minds existence before the time everything was set into motion. Sounds too much like God. OK... Everything was just mysteriously here ever since the beginning of time; and time started... by some haphazard occurrence... Alright, third times a charm. There was no beginning. There is no end. Everything that exists has always just existed from time extended from negative innity to the present. There is no reason for our existence. Objects in motion have always been in motion. It is only by the principle of serendipitous chance that life exists, that I am capable of reason, and that Math, the product of pure logic, is parallel to the Laws of Physics. My sense of reason is probably askew, but theres no way of knowing this because I am conned to my mind, an alternative reality serendipitously created by neurons ring, and these neurons re from some serendipitous neuron ring mechanism which stems from... neurons ring (among other things). Oh how grateful I am, dear Serendipity!
4.2.2
God Exists
29
4.3
30
4.4
31
4.5