Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
com/locate/msea
The Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, 3 -1 -1 Yoshinodai, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 229 -8510, Japan Department of Applied Chemistry, Tokai Uni6ersity, 1117 Kitakaname, Hiratsuka, Kanagawa 259 -1292, Japan Received 17 May 2001; received in revised form 28 June 2001
Abstract Solid-state diffusion bonding (DB) was demonstrated for joining closed-cell aluminum foams (ALPORAS). A superplastic 5083 aluminum alloy sheet was inserted between the foams to assist the DB process. Microscopic observation revealed that the cell wall of the foams penetrated into the 5083 alloy sheet and their boundary partly disappeared. Energy dispersion X-ray spectrometer (EDS) conrmed the diffusion of magnesium element from the 5083 alloy to the aluminum foam regions. The bonding strength was evaluated by four-points bending tests. The obtained exure stress was about 50% of the original foam at room temperature and was more than 60% at 423 K. The advantage of the DB process in the high temperature applications was discussed comparing with the adhesive bonding of aluminum foams. 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Aluminum foam; 5083 AlMg alloy; Superplasticity; Diffusion bonding; Bending test
1. Introduction Foamed materials have many attractive properties because of their light weight and cell structure. The advantages of metal foams over the conventional polymer foams are the high melting temperature and the large compressive strength. The manufacturing process of metal foams has been improved in the past few years; especially closed-cell aluminum and its alloy foams have been made by casting [1] and powder metallurgy processes [2]. If we use metal foams in engineering structures, we must consider the methods of joining them to other materials. The most popular joining method of massive metals is welding. Welding process for metal foams, however, seems to have much difculty because of the volume reduction during the solidication of the melted cell structures. Bonding by adhesives or solders has been used in most metal honeycomb structures. In this case, the bonding strength of the adhesives dominates the mechanical properties of the honeycomb structures. Though the adhesive bonding process is superior for low temperature applica-
* Corresponding author. Tel.: + 81-42-759-8264; fax: +81-42-7598461. E-mail address: kitazono@materials.isas.ac.jp (K. Kitazono).
tions, the expansion to high temperature region is limited. In the present study, solid-state diffusion bonding (DB) process is proposed and demonstrated experimentally against aluminum foams. The DB process is an attractive manufacturing method for joining dissimilar metals and for making the complex components [3]. Unlike other joining processes, it preserves the base metal microstructure at the interface. The DB process generally requires large compressive stress to break up oxide layers and to contact the surfaces closely enough in the atomic scale. Metal foams, however, will easily deform plastically under such a large stress condition. Inserting a superplastic material [4] into the boundary will decrease the compressive stress necessary for DB process. Large plastic deformation due to the superplastic forming under relatively low stresses assists the oxide layers to break up and the surfaces to contact. This paper consists of the following. First, the DB condition is discussed based on the high temperature properties of aluminum foams and superplastic aluminum alloy. Second, the DB tests are performed under the estimated conditions. Finally, the results of the DB tests are discussed through microscopic observation and mechanical test. The bonded boundary is observed by optical microscope and analyzed by energy dispersion
0921-5093/02/$ - see front matter 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. PII: S 0 9 2 1 - 5 0 9 3 ( 0 1 ) 0 1 7 6 6 - X
129
X-ray spectrometer (EDS). The bonding strength is examined by the four-points bending test
3. Bonding condition
Fig. 1. Results of uniaxial compression test of ALPORAS foam at 823 and 773 K. The crosshead speed is 0.1 mm min 1. The compressive strength is observed as 0.24 and 0.41 MPa at 823 and 773 K, respectively.
130
Fig. 2. Schematic illustration of DB apparatus. The inserted 5083 alloy sheet between the foams is locally heated by an induction coil. The temperature is measured through a spot-welded thermocouple onto the sheet.
MPa was uniaxially applied to the ALPORAS foam for 30 min. Bonding strengths of the diffusion-bonded specimens were examined by four-points bending tests with a distance of 30 mm between supporting rods. After DB test, the specimen was machined to a rectangular plate with 38 mm length, 10 mm width and 4 mm height. The 5083 alloy sheet was positioned at the center of the plate. The apparatus was set in Shimadzu Autograph testing machine and the plate was bent with the constant crosshead speed of 0.5 mm min 1. The tests were performed in atmosphere under the conditions of room temperature (298 K) and high temperature (423 K). For comparison, similar bending tests were carried out using original ALPORAS foam and adhesive bonded ALPORAS foams. The adhesives used were commercial epoxy and polyester. Epoxy adhesive is mainly used in room temperature region and polyester in a slightly higher temperature region.
plastic deformation of 5083 alloy. In the following section, the DB test is carried out under the condition of the external stress of 0.2 MPa. However, it is noted that the deformation mode during the DB test is similar to indentation creep for 5083 alloy, which is somewhat different from the uniaxial tensile creep. We need the data of indentation creep of the inserted superplastic material for more precise estimation of the DB condition.
4. Diffusion bonding
131
hand, the diffusion-bonded specimen at 773 K was broken at the bonded interface. The exure strength was about a half of the original ALPORAS foam. Bending strength was quantitatively evaluated by the maximum exure stress |f, which is calculated as |f = PL , wh 2 (1)
where P is the maximum applied load, L is the distance between the support rods, w is the width of the specimen and h is the height of the specimen. The exure stresses in various bending tests are shown in Fig. 6. At room temperature as shown in Fig. 6(a), the exure stresses of the original ALPORAS foam and the adhesive-bonded foam by epoxy were almost identical. Relatively low strength was measured on the adhesivebonded specimens by polyester and two kinds of diffu-
Fig. 4. Composition of Mg element measured by EDAX/EDS system. Mg element diffused from 5083 alloy to ALPORAS foam region in the bonding process at 773 K for 30 min.
Fig. 5. Typical result of four-points bending test at room temperature. The uniaxial load was applied with the constant speed of 0.5 mm min 1. Original ALPORAS foam was plastically deformed without fracture and the diffusion-bonded specimen was fractured at the bonded boundary.
Fig. 3. (a) Macroscopic photograph of the diffusion-bonded specimen after bonding test at 773 K for 30 min. (b) Optical micrograph around the diffusion-bonded boundary. Cell wall of ALPORAS foam penetrated into the 5083 alloy sheet.
sion-bonded specimens at 773 and 823 K. The effects of the bonding temperature did not appear in the present experimental results. In the case of high temperature bending test at 423 K as shown in Fig. 6(b), the exure stress of original and adhesive bonded foams signicantly decreased; especially adhesive-bonded specimens by epoxy could not maintain the bonding. On the other hand, the exure stresses of the diffusion-bonded specimens were identical to those measured at room temperature. The relative exure strength of the diffusion-bonded specimen was more than 60% of that of the original foam, but did not reach the original strength. The DB process of aluminum alloys without special techniques is essentially difcult because of the insolu-
132
tures. In the present paper, the DB process was rst demonstrated using the closed-cell aluminum foam (ALPORAS). Commercial superplastic 5083 aluminum alloy sheet was inserted between the foams to assist the DB process. EDS analysis showed Mg diffusion from the 5083 alloy to the ALPORAS foam. Flexure strength was evaluated by four-points bending test. The maximum exure stress of diffusion-bonded specimen was half of the ALPORAS foam. Though the adhesive bonded ALPORAS foam showed signicant drops of exure stress, the diffusion bonded specimen showed null decrease of the bending strength. This result indicates that DB is effective at high temperature condition. The obtained bonding strength will be improved by controlling the surfaces and atmosphere conditions to minimize the stable oxide layer at the surfaces of ALPORAS foams and 5083 alloy sheet. We can conclude that the present demonstration of the superplastic DB process is easily expanded to other foamed materials.
Acknowledgements This work was partially funded by Kanagawa Academy of Science and Technology. The authors thank Shinko Wire Co. and Sky Aluminum Co. for providing the materials.
References
Fig. 6. Results of four-points bending tests at 298 K (a) and 423 K (b). Maximum exure stresses are plotted for ALPORAS foam, diffusion-bonded and adhesive-bonded specimens. The epoxy adhesive could not maintain the bonding at 423 K. [1] A.E. Simone, L.J. Gibson, Acta Mater. 46 (1998) 3109. [2] C. Korner, F. Berger, M. Arnold, C. Stadelmann, R.F. Singer, Mater. Sci. Tech. 16 (2000) 781. [3] H. Kokawa, T. Tsuzuki, T. Kuwana, ISIJ Int. 35 (1995) 1291. [4] J.W. Edington, K.N. Melton, C.P. Cutler, Prog. Mater. Sci. 21 (1976) 61 overview. [5] S. Akiyama, et al., United States Patent No. 4713277 (1987). [6] T. Miyoshi, M. Ito, S. Akiyama, A. Kitahara, Adv. Eng. Mater. 2 (2000) 179. [7] R. Verma, P.A. Friedman, A.K. Ghosh, S. Kim, C. Kim, Metall. Trans. 27A (1996) 1889. [8] K. Kannan, C.H. Johnson, C.H. Hamilton, Metall. Trans. 29A (1998) 1211. [9] H. Iwasaki, H. Hosokawa, T. Mori, T. Tagata, K. Higashi, Mater. Sci. Eng. A252 (1998) 199. [10] E.W. Andrews, L.J. Gibson, M.F. Ashby, Acta Mater. 47 (1999) 2853. [11] F. Han, Z. Zhu, J. Gao, Metall. Trans. 29A (1998) 2497. [12] ASTM E 1245 (1995). [13] P.-J. Winkler, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Superplasticity and Superplastic Forming, TMS, 1988, p. 491.
ble oxide layer. One report described that the relative strength of diffusion-bonded aluminum alloy was 50% of that of the original material [13]. The present experimental result agrees well with the previous report. The advanced DB process in aluminum alloy requires the removal of oxide layer followed by the protection of the surface by coating techniques.
5. Summary Until now, adhesive bonding process has been widely used for joining metal foams to make sandwich struc-