Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 3

Case3:08-cv-03343-SI Document269

Filed11/17/11 Page1 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

[COUNSEL IDENTIFIED ON THE SIGNATURE PAGE]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

RAMBUS INC., 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. NVIDIA CORPORATION, Defendant and CounterClaimant Plaintiff and CounterDefendant

Case No. 3:08-cv-03343-SI STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR NVIDIA TO REQUEST REVIEW OF SPECIAL MASTER INFANTES ORDER DATED NOVEMBER 10, 2011 Judge: Honorable Susan Illston

According to paragraph five of Your Honors Order Appointing the Honorable Edward Infante (Ret.) as Special Master, dated May 1, 2009, a party wishing to file objections to the Special Masters orders must file the objection within 14 days from the day the Special Master filed the order. On November 10, 2011, Special Master Infante filed his Order Denying

NVIDIAs Request for Clarification of the October 31, 2011 Order (Special Master Infantes November 10th Order). Currently any objection to Special Master Infantes November 10th Order is due November 28, 2011. NVIDIA wishes to request review or file an objection to the Special Masters order. Rambus has indicated it would not oppose NVIDIA seeking a one-week

STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR NVIDIA TO REQUEST REVIEW OF SPECIAL MASTERS ORDER CASE NO. C-08-03343 SI

Case3:08-cv-03343-SI Document269

Filed11/17/11 Page2 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

extension.1 Accordingly, the parties jointly request that the deadline for NVIDIA to request review or object to Special Master Infantes November 10th Order be extended to December 5, 2011, with Rambuss opposition deadline on December 19, 2011. The parties are not seeking to alter any other dates through this stipulated motion, and any extension to the deadline for NVIDIA objecting to Special Master Infantes November 10, 2011 order will not affect the case schedule.

Respectfully submitted, Dated: November 17, 2011 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP By: /s/ Stephanie L. Carpenter The Orrick Building 405 Howard Street San Francisco, CA 94105-2669 Phone: 415/773-5765 Facsimile: 415/773-5759 Email: scarpenter@orrick.com Attorneys for Defendant NVIDIA CORPORATION

Dated: November 17, 2011

MCKOOL SMITH HENNIGAN, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION CROWELL & MORING LLP By:/s/ Pierre J. Hubert Pierre J. Hubert 300 West 6th Street, Suite 1700 Austin, Texas 78701 Phone: 512/692-8700 Facsimile: 512/692-8744 Email: phubert@mckoolsmith.com

Because Rambuss position with respect to NVIDIAs request for an extension is one of non-opposition, Rambus is not providing a supporting declaration. Rambus does not adopt or admit statements in any accompanying declaration that NVIDIA chooses to submit.

-1-

STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR NVIDIA TO REQUEST REVIEW OF SPECIAL MASTERS ORDER CASE NO. C-08-03343 SI

Case3:08-cv-03343-SI Document269

Filed11/17/11 Page3 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Attorneys for Plaintiff RAMBUS INC.

Filers Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, X(B), I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from its signatory. Dated: November 17, 2011 Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Stephanie L. Carpenter Stephanie L. Carpenter

STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR NVIDIA TO REQUEST REVIEW OF SPECIAL MASTERS ORDER CASE NO. C-08-03343 SI