Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
● Are the Palestinians native to the land where Israel now exists?
● So why did so many Arabs end up in Palestine?
● So before the creation of the State of Israel, who were the
Palestinians?
● What was the identity of the Arabs of Palestine at the end of the
Ottoman Empire?
● Are the Palestinians a separate and unique people, different from the
other Arabs? When did the notion arise - of the Palestinians as a
separate Arab people?
● What was the initial reaction of the Arabs of Palestine to this new and
separate national identity?
● Who is the real enemy of the Palestinian Arabs?
● What will be the function of the new 'secular, democratic' Palestinian
state?
Are the Palestinians native to the land where Israel now exists?
- David Basch
● During the British Mandate, even well into the 1940s, Arabs were
allowed into "Palestine" in huge numbers without visa or passport,
especially from the Hauran District of Syria, while the British
continued to do everything possible to prevent Jews from entering,
even down to the last minute when all attempts were made to deny
entry to thousands of Jewish refugees fleeing the Nazis. Only in 1948
were Jewish refugees allowed free entry to their homeland, and that
was because Israel had, once again, become an independent nation.
● Palestinian leaders claim that Israel is built on Arab land, when the
truth is that eyewitnesses such as Mark Twain and Rev. Manning
of England who visited the Holy Land in the last century wrote that
the land was barren and empty. The population then was less that
5% of today's population.
Thus the Zionist slogan "The Land without a people for the people
without a land" was absolutely correct. The slogan did not mean that
there were no inhabitants at all in Palestine, it just indicated that the
non-Jewish population constituted a conglomeration of dozens of
heterogeneous groups of residents having very little in common, i.e.
not constituting a single nation, a people. These residents were not
united by any specific national idea. Parkes wrote that the Balfour
declaration for the first time established a "unit called Palestine on a
political map. ...There was no such thing historically as a 'Palestinian
Arab', and there was no feeling of unity among 'the Arabs' of this
newly defined area".
● Until 1950, the name of the Jerusalem Post was THE PALESTINE
POST; the journal of the Zionist Organization of America was NEW
PALESTINE; Bank Leumi was the ANGLO-PALESTINE BANK; the
Israel Electric Company was the PALESTINE ELECTRIC COMPANY;
What was the identity of the Arabs of Palestine at the end of the
Ottoman Empire?
But that's too much for the Arabs. They want it all. And that is
ultimately what the fighting in Israel is about today. Greed. Pride.
Envy. Covetousness. No matter how many land concessions the
Israelis make, it will never be enough.
● The concept of "Palestinians" is one that did not exist until about
1948, when the Arab inhabitants, of what until then was Palestine,
wished to differentiate themselves from the Jews. Until then, the
Jews were the Palestinians. There was the Palestinian Brigade of
Jewish volunteers in the British World War II Army (at a time when
the Palestinian Arabs were in Berlin hatching plans with Adolf Hitler
for world conquest and how to kill all the Jews); there was the
- New York Times, June 12, 2000 (via CFICEJ's ISRAEL REPORT May/
June 2000)
● It is mainly in the past few decades that "Palestinian" has been co-
opted by the Arabs, as if the name belongs exclusively to them,
pretending to have a long history and independent national identity.
Until 1967, most of those who now call themselves Palestinians were
reasonably happy with their Jordanian citizenship and with calling
themselves "Jordanians" Even today, there is strong support among
the "Palestinian" majority of Jordan for their Hashemite monarchy,
though King Hussein relies on his Bedouin troops when he needs
absolute loyalty.
The use of a term like "Palestinian" without the suffix "Arab" and the
term "Israeli-Occupied Palestine" have served to confuse the public
into thinking that there has always been an independent "Palestinian"
people which hasn't been given the opportunity for self-
determination. In fact, any such failure has been the fault of the
government of Jordan, which covers the majority of what was once
known as "Palestine" and in which the majority of Palestinian Arabs
live.
has been noted many times before, prior to 1948, that is before Jews
had begun to call themselves Israelis, the only persons known as
"Palestinians" were Jews, with the Arabs much preferrring to identify
themselves as part of the great Arab nation.
- David Basch
● The actual word "Palestine" came from the Romans, not the Arabs,
and there has never been an independent country or state of
Palestine, nor a Palestinian rule. Yet we are led to believe that there
are Palestinians and then there are Arabs.
Syrian President Hafez Assad once told PLO leader Yassir Arafat:
Southern Syria, and we consider that it is our right and duty to insist
that it be a liberated partner of our Arab homeland and of Syria."
● ...the Arab leadership realized how much more effective they could
make their efforts to "throw the Jews into the sea" if they became
Palestinians rather than Arabs. By then, the Jews of this country (the
only people called Palestinians before the War of Independence) were
named Israelis. Even The Palestine Post became The Jerusalem Post.
By adopting the name 'Palestinians' the Arabs succeeded in
converting the Arab-Israeli conflict from a war of annihilation against
the Jewish population to a struggle of dispossessed natives against
colonialist invaders. It was a spectacularly effective canard,
eventually adopted by Israel's own fiction weavers, the 'new
historians.'
What was the initial reaction of the Arabs of Palestine to this new
and separate national identity?
● ...after the Six-Day War, when Yasser Arafat and Fatah tried to
establish their infrastructures in what they referred to as the West
Bank they were rejected by the Arabs themselves. Neil Livingstone
and David Halevy wrote in Inside the PLO, "The effort, however,
turned out to be one of Fatah's greatest failures, not so much
because of Israeli efficiency in ferreting out the secret network as
because of Palestinian apathy. At that point many Palestinians living
in the West Bank were actually relieved to be out from under the
oppressive yoke of Jordanian rule and simply wanted to find some
kind of accommodation with the Israelis. Within months Arafat was
forced to leave the West Bank on the run".
The Arab leaders are well aware of the fragility of the Palestinian
identity for the majority of the Palestinian Arabs. This is the main
reason why they have not allowed the Palestinian Arabs living in the
refugee camps, for almost half a century, to intermingle with Arabs
of their countries. Lebanese Prime Minister Rafiq al-Hariri
confirmed this on February 5, 1998 in an interview with London MBC
Television. He said the following; "We do not want to fall into the
trap of resettling the Palestinians. This would lead to resettling the
Palestinian refugees and their eventual assimilation. The Palestinians
themselves have consistently rejected this approach so that their
cause and characteristic identity might not be lost".
● First of all, who really believes that a Palestinian state will be either
secular or democratic?
● "We are slowly and dangerously moving towards a police state where
intimidation and threats become the norm instead of the rule of law."