Everything Never Stops

by Charles Michael Couch

Dedication

This book is dedicated to the Free Energy Researchers and Pioneers who have given their lives, hour by hour, to discover these things; especially those who actually gave their lives completely rather than sell out to the oppressive Powers that Be; Stanley Meyers, Bruce De Palma, Eugene Mallove, and others; and to those who are called collateral damage in the immoral Oil Wars that never would have been, had these technologies not been suppressed for decades; and specifically to Bob Boyce and Jean-Louis Naudin.

Prelude

Isaac Newton said, An object in motion tends to remain in motion until another force acts upon it. He did not say, An object at rest remains at rest until...; probably because he thought about his theorems very carefully. He must have realized that nothing has ever truly been at rest, everything has always been in motion of one kind or another. The rest of any object is an illusion of relativity, the apparent rest is only relative to some other object. Rather than actually being at rest the two related objects are merely in syncronous motion with each other. With respect to other things in the Universe, they are moving very rapidly.

This awareness of the continuous motion of all things has been dreadfully violated by those who pretend that perpetual motion is impossible based on the conservation of energy laws. In truth these laws are even suspect as in violation of all known modern observation; it being impossible to locate one single thing in the entire universe that is actually NOT moving. It seems to be a universal fact that all things ARE in perpetual motion. So, someone needs to restate this arcane law in some way that is actually true. Perhaps they should start with these words, objects in relative syncronous motion tend to remain in relative syncronous motion unless...

Now that we are starting from the real place with an actual truth; the only thing we are trying to overcome is the tendency of objects in relative syncronous motion to remain that

way. Doesn't it seem like it would be easy to make two objects that are in fact in motion at all times take different paths? Sometimes almost everyone fails to see the forest for looking at the same trees. Perpetual motion is NOT impossible, it is in fact the absolute, inescapable, total rule to which we can not find one example of exception. Yes, it is past time to rewrite the Physics books. A more accurate rule might be, Friction and Gravity sometimes overcome the overall relative motion of two objects.

Perpetual

Motion is not the impossible exception, it is the rule.

Michael Couch

Chapter 1 How I got Entangled in Free Energy

Ask a hundred men if they've ever tried to build a permanent magnet perpetual motion motor in their mind and five will admit it. The other ninety-five are lying. OK, maybe I'm exaggerating, but not much. There's just something about a magnet that is

mysterious, magical, logic defying, and just plain befuddling. Where does that energy come from?

In order to wrap their heads around how a magnet can do work veritably eternally without energy input; modern scientists have deceived themselves into saying that magnets don't actually do work, it just looks like they are working. I like the way one writer puts it, if you think magnets don't do work, pick up 150 lbs of steel and hold it in the air indefinitely. Permanent magnets do that.

My journey to Free Energy believer and advocate began with a dozen or so Radio Shack dough-nut magnets. Like probably the majority of men who can't resist the urge to actually try, and are brave enough to endure the laughter of their family members who look on; I knew that all I had to do was unbalance them and the magnets would go on forever. My beautiful wife at the time, thought I had lost my mind.

But that didn't surprise me, it seems no matter what I did she never believed in me. The

fact that I'm not a mega-millionaire in the cell phone industry is just one proof of that. In 1983, I could have bought a cell tower for $5,000. She didn't think it was a good idea.

We bought an early VHS video recording system for $600 because I couldn't stand to watch my kids grow up so fast. I wanted a permanent record of their immeasurable cuteness. One night after filming, about the same year as the cell phone deal, I confided in her. "One day these recorders will be very small and light, everyone will have one, and there will be millions of very funny home videos... You see where I'm going with this. She didn't like that idea either.

"A prophet is not without honor, save in his own country and his own house." Hadn't I discovered the first Contemporary Christian Music hit to make it to the top forty, "Oh, Happy Day"? Hadn't I successfully predicted the advent of the home computer

explosion, well, maybe it wasn't quite an explosion in 1981 but it was coming soon, I just knew it.

So, there I was trying to glue Radio Shack dough nut magnets to the inside of Coke can. Needless to say hand tools and scissors weren't quite accurate enough to actually make it work, or that was my excuse. But anyone that has ever seriously played with this concept knows that it does something that communicates to you, it can work, if you could make it precise enough. ( Insert Illustration No. 1 here, Coke Magnet Motor)

This is where the Spring issue of Science and Mechanics comes into the story. I can't help but wonder how many free energy researchers were launched by it, into thousands of hours of tinkering, thinking, reading, testing, dreaming, and scrimping for cash for his next part. For all of you family members that firmly believe he was bonkers, read on. Howard Johnson's Magnet Motor was featured on the cover of that issue, and though it would only be in our own minds, minds that firmly believed and studied enough to understand, we were vindicated.

Johnson received a patent for a permanent magnet motor, that everyone in the patent office had to admit to themselves was working. I believe the direct quote of one

examiner was, "How would you like to follow that act?" Howard held a magnet in the middle of Stonehenge looking array of slightly curved magnets mounted with sticky tape to a sheet of plywood attached to a "lazy Susan", and the Magnet Motor movement was launched in earnest, at least in the hearts of the faithful. Johnson also demonstrated a linear version by placing a train on a track with magnets beneath it. The train raced across flying off the other end. He turned it around, put it back on the track; and it flew across the track and off the other side.

(Insert Figure No. 2 copies of the drawings from the patent here, they are public domain images.)

That one Coke can experiment was enough to convince me that it could be done, and enough to teach me that it would require a great deal more precision than that of which I

was capable with machine tools, much less with hand tools. Fortunately there are several such miraculous devices that don't require that kind of precision.

Howard Johnson's devices weren't high precision except for the magnets themselves but making those magnets was beyond my ability, so needless to say, I didn't replicate the Johnson motor. Nor, to my knowledge has anyone else to date. But Howard Johnson Motor replication attempts are just now starting to show up on Youtube.com. I haven't had the chance to check them out yet though.

I did make a phone call to Virginia Polytechnic Institute and asked to speak to Mr. Howard Johnson, they denied that any such professor worked there, strange. But not the first "strange" event to be associated with the Free Energy field, nor the last. He may have worked for Virginia Tech or one of those other Virginia schools, I can't say if it was my mistake or a misprint in the article. Anyway, I never got to talk to him.

I graduated from Electronics Technology School with a certificate that same year. My teacher knew everything about electronics and could communicate none of it. Thank goodness the book made some sense though. Out of a class of 18 or 20, three of us graduated, and one of those didn't even come to pick up his certificate. But, the seeds of Free Energy that reside in the realm of electronics were planted in my brain. I won't bore you with the details but the parallel vs. serial resonance circuits have probably turned on many a mental light bulb. "Theoretically" one of them can run forever. I'd have to look it up right now to tell you which one. You can look it up for yourself, it actually made it

into the book. They just tell you that the "theoretically possible" is impossible due to heat losses or something like that, thus the search for room temperature superconductors continues.

I took my Electronics Certificate and walked directly into the field of board level Computer Repair Technician, working on IBM-PCs, Apple IIs, Epson printers; etc.; and witnessed the birth of the Mac, and the forgotten IBM-PC Jr. I had spent 1981 hacking on an RCA Comsat 1802 Netronics Elf II in machine code, not assembler, machine code! I still miss that operation code set, all CPUs should be that simple and powerful. Well, with Ghz speed and Gigabytes of memory of course. I still have projects I wont even attempt until someone comes out with one.

The bad news is, I never got any useful, practical experience with component level electronics beyond my hobby days before I got my "electronics training". This is a huge hole in my knowledge that causes me constant difficulty and has largely been the factor that kept me focused more on developing ideas for others with more experiential knowledge to test. I know the potentials enough to design the box diagrams that really make sense but I have an inescapable dependence on other hands-on people for actually bringing those designs to even useful testing stages.

As technician for the largest computer store in the South Eastern United States, I got to handle some of the first "portable" Compaq computers, more than I really wanted to do. We got in the twelve very first machines and nine had failed power supplies. It was a

super pain in the rear to change them, but after that, I was very intimately acquainted with the coolest computer of the time. Well, there was the Hyperion and the Grid, but they never caught on.

After I left the computer store, I got a job programing the Franklin Printing Industry pricing data into a Radio Shack TRS-80 for a local printer and making the first talking, color graphic, arcade style, games for the IBM-PC Color Computer (the four color model) for a company in Knoxville, and then again for my own company called Hypersystems. My brief stint of entrepreneurship ended with an acquaintance who had bought the previous company, C & C Software, for which I had worked, also buying our company's stock and corporation. I still can't quite figure out how both deals managed to leave me with Nada.

I took a job with the most reputable office machine company in Knoxville programming their expensive Hotel and Restaurant Cash Register Systems, the Rolls Royce of such systems. While there, they developed a problem with power surges on the mains power line knocking out this very expensive equipment. The maker kept flying in experts from the home office to solve the problems. In the end a very expensive special device discovered that there were frequent instantaneous energy spikes on the power lines that were the culprit.

I wondered why this expensive equipment was crippled by that, and yet, our less expensive, Japanese, Tech cash registers were unharmed. An examination of the Tech

schematic revealed an ingenious circuit that converted these high voltage spikes into pulse lengths, basically it was like rebroadcasting AM into FM on the radio. Free Energy devices was revealed to me in the operation of this circuit. A key of

Electronic devices seem usually to fail at one of two points in their operation, turning on and turning off. While meditating on this, or from quizzing the companies experts about it, I forget which; I came to the revelation of what was happening. When a device is turned on or off, there is an instantaneous magnetic field collapse or build up. This was creating a super fast magnetic flux field movement.

(Insert Figure No. 2 Flux Field and Wire drawing diagrams here)

Magnetic flux field movement is how electricity is created in generators by passing a coil of wire through the stationary flux field of a permanent or electric magnet. The more numerous the flux field lines, the stronger the field, the faster the coil or magnet moves with respect to each other; the more power is produced.

On start up the flux field comes out of the wire, or ether, or nothingness, or wherever it comes from, instantly, maybe at near the speed of light. Who knows? The important thing is that it is moving across the other wires as it grows, or as it collapses instantly, as it is turned off. It occurred to me, Hhhhmmmmm, couldn't you create a generator just by turning on and off a transformer coil as fast as possible. Keep this thought in mind as we go down this road.

If you've never seen a flux field you can get an old (don't ruin a good one) color TV or computer Monitor and turn it on with a white background or white noise (off the station) showing on the screen. Now, hold a rectangular Radio Shack cobalt magnet up to the screen. Those magenta and cyan lines you see are magnetic flux fields and they exist wherever electricity is running through a wire and coming out of every magnet. Every magnet and coil will have different field thicknesses and density, and may not be visible this way. It's a lot of fun to play with them, though. If you can't do this yourself, there are youtube videos of others doing it.

2B Part 2 of How I
From my hobbyist computer experience, I came up with a design for a memory device that I pitched to the Pellissippi Parkway Technology Foundation in Knoxville, TN. They got the Tennessee Valley Authority to pay for a patent search on the idea. The search came up clear, but omitted even things I already knew about that came close to it. About this time, I went through a divorce, lost interest in the device, and most of the world. Many years later a similar device would come to market, that device is only now, barely beginning to make its mark on the world, the Flash Drive.

I had been tinkering with trying to build my own synthesizer, as I was learning about electronics and computers, because I had recorded a Contemporary Christian Album of my original songs. A very talented musician named Richard Mogridge had played an Arp Axe synthesizer so brilliantly on it, that I was worried about how I would ever reproduce those sounds on stage without a complete orchestra. So, I began to build a synthesizer in my mind with my knowledge of electronics and computers. Over the years it evolved into a MiDi keyboard with a full MS-Dos, Windows Microsoft IBM compatible computer with touch screen and Internet interface built in, along with a Proteus sound module, Cakewalk sequencing and Digital audio recording, piano lessons; and the ability to download full orchestrations from the Internet. You might have seen

one, the Van Koevering Digital Piano. It was featured on Computer Chronicles, back in the 90's.

Unfortunately I had been left out of the company for ten years and the tone module had never been updated from my original specifications. Though it was called the "State of the Art" in 1998 Digital Piano Buyer's Guide, lack of updates for ten years in the electronics industry had doomed it in the market place with its obsolete sounds, underpowered sequencer software and undersized mass storage. Oh well, that's what happens when you screw the inventor out of his company.

Before this treachery though, I was communicating my synthesizer design ideas to my business plan writer, David Van Koevering, I was also trying to put together a digital recording studio device or find one someone else had put together. The Synclavier, Kerzweil, and D2 Revox were just coming onto the market at the time and Sony had a digital 2 track mastering machine. Mastering houses were using two track digital

recording systems to master vinyl LPs. which had not yet been obsoleted by CDs. The Analog or Digital debate was raging between the audio engineers of Nashville. Digital Design was dominating the home and semi-pro studios with the Mac, and making inroads into the Nashville scene.

Record producer Garry S. Paxton sent me to Chicago to scan the field of new technology at the National Association of Musical Instrument Manufacturers Show for three days. While there, among other things, I got food poisoning from eating barbecued shrimp at the Chicago Festival of Lights (a little human interest and color to help all the technology

go down easier). It hit me just as I was getting off the plane back in Nashville. The big news at that NAMDA show was the Emu digital hard disk recorder/keyboard and though it was way out of my price range, it was nice to know that the manufacturers were working toward making my dreams come true.

Arcnet, message boards, and usernets were turning into the Internet over these months. I took a job programming Cadol II on Contel Super Micros turning a wholesaler from batch processing to real-time on-line operation. Alternative energy, magnet motors and free energy was out of my mind for years during this period.

Another divorce, and I found myself struggling to survive in every way. I don't know how the whole economy was doing, but everything was tanking for me and I sort of gave up on business activity altogether. By this time, I'd been through several small business catastrophes and had come away from them with an absolute lack of trust toward anyone wearing a tie.

I don't really remember how it started or what focused my attention on the Internet and the JLNLabs.org yahoo egroup, but this is when it started. I think it was from going to the library to do research on my memory device again. I was still trying to get some company interested in research and development of my stationary magnetic memory device, it was 1990 or 91. I could be wrong about the dates, the years run together during this period, I was depressed, seriously depressed. So, depressed, I think, no one would hire me. But that was fine with me because I had lost all trust in employers or partners

either one. Yet I still imagined that I might find a worthy one of either to work with my memory device.

I had lost touch with David Van Koevering and figured he had dropped the digital piano idea, so I was still pitching that idea to potential partners as well. I got a job in Ft. Lauderdale, on the beach strip, in a place called Wednesday's, playing my original music and a few old standards, mostly R&B. I wrote quite a few songs during this time in Ft. Lauderdale. As one of them says, "my old dream of paradise, was only missing one big slice...", I was miserable living in paradise surrounded by beauties from all over the world.

I finally realized I was depressed and needed some serious help with that, so, I moved back to Gulfport, MS where I could be around my supportive family, chiefly my sister, Laurie. I got into a divorce/grief recovery class and got involved in a couple non-profit efforts, the Gulf Coast GoodNews Newspaper; and later Hope Foundation of Gulfport, an effort to house homeless foster kids. In between those efforts I tried to devote my time to the JLNLabs egroup as it was an exciting time in there. It was like a whole new world was opening up and I was camping with its pioneers, if not one of them myself.

Chapter 3 Weird and Wonderful

Though the beginnings are a little fuzzy, the Internet became my haven and refuge. My emotional life was sucking big time, so I pretty much lived in my head and the JLNLabs egroup was a great place to fill a head with wonder and ideas to ponder and explore. Jean-Louis Naudin had opened Pandora's Box with a meticulously prepared website of various wondrous devices, information about them; and, most importantly, actual working replications, photos, and documentation of his work.

This website still exists and I highly recommend it though it isn't quite as all inclusive today as it was then, THE place to start on the Free Energy journey. The archives of this group can be found on the Web archive; if it isn't still all there in the JLNlabs egroup which is pretty much silent these days. But it was a launch pad, like a hit sitcom spinning off new shows, new groups built around each new promising device. What was possibly unique about the JLNLabs egroup is that all the researchers began to support each other; share useful info and encouragement; brain storm; and promote knowledge of each other's work. Some people point to this group as the beginning of the Open Source Science movement on the WEB or Open Source Free Energy movement. But it could be argued that ARCNET, the precursor to the Internet itself, was that; since it was built for sharing information between scientists and academia across companies and organizations.

Maybe it just lacked the concepts of Open Source, Public Domain and General Licensing back then.

I'm not sure, but I suspect, and there is some evidence, that prior to that, there was more of an every-man-for-himself attitude within the Free Energy community. Each inventor or researcher had their proprietary secret, looking to patent technology, focused on promoting their pet device; and put down, or gave the cold shoulder, to all the others. An awareness was building though, that we all shared a common enemy, Free Energy suppression by the fabled "powers that be", the PTB, who were not above employing the "men in black", the MIB; to intimidate, buy off, destroy, steal, and yes, even kill the inventors to keep this technology from making it into the market place.

So, one might well ask, if what you are trying to do is thoroughly declared to be impossible, and even if you do succeed, it will never make it to market because the government or private goons will either, buy you out, intimidate you, declare your technology "national security risk" and place you under a gag order, or simply kill you; why would you work so hard on building a Free Energy device? Because, nearly twenty years ago for me, and much longer for others; we realized what the whole world realizes today, the survival of the world, or at least billions of people on it, depends on these technologies becoming common place.

Today even the most skeptical sentient human being knows, we are at war. Not with Iraq, with vested diabolical interests who purchase billions of dollars of cute,

heartwarming advertising on TV to tell us they love us and are working on the solution. How deep is that shit? Very! These wicked men (and maybe some women) are willing to slaughter hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqi people to preserve, nay to maximize, their oil income annuity. A few select Free Energy inventors would weigh no more than a feather on their consciences, assuming they still had those.

Time will not allow, at least not in this chapter, us to diverge into discussion of the New World Order, Illuminati, Thule Society, Skull & Bones, CFR, Federal Reserve Bank, IMF, World Bank,. Jesuits, the Black Pope, and all that other John Birch Society fare which none of us believed until shortly after 9/11 presented us with an irrefutable wakeup call. So, discussing whether it is all about the oil or the oil is just a factor, it doesn't matter. It is a battle we must win or die.

Many researchers and inventors I have found, are motivated by the purest of Christian or Humanitarian motives. There is a surprisingly high correlation between benevolent

motives and creating working Free Energy devices. It seems God really does, "tell the one who cares". Einstein said all ideas come from God. The magnitude, indeed, the seeming universality of the link between caring and creating real solutions has convinced me this is true. It seems that unfailingly, trying to help the poor in the world is high on the motivation list of every Free Energy inventor whose technology I respect. Stanley Meyers knew his life was in danger yet he refused billions in offers to buy (and shelve) his technology; in order to see that it got to the people. It cost him his life; but giving his life may have been one of the most influential events in Free Energy development.

Stanley Meyers made it to 60 Minutes in 1996 with his dune buggy running 100% on water and nothing else. Yet in 1998, he clutched his throat and ran out into the street yelling, "I've been poisoned", and died. His brother Steve attempts to carry on his work through a company called Xogen. The Canadian Stock Exchange strangled that

companies only 20% corporate stock holder, Tathecus, by freezing the investor companies stock under the guise of "investigating the Xogen claims". To my knowledge the CDX has never released a report, it has been about seven years since they froze trading in the stock, I suspect the company, Tathecus, was murdered for investing in Xogen.

So, Stanley Meyers may have already been dead when the JLNLabs egroup took up his technology as a favored topic, so were Dr. Sweet, Edwin Gray, and Bruce De Palma to mention a few, Dr. Searl was in jail, Paul Valone was probably being thrown out of the Patent office about then, and Eugene Mallove was resigning from the MIT Journal in protest over their fudging the data to denounce Cold Fusion. It wasn't a good time to be an FE Researcher. Casualties were heavy, if not in bodies, in all sorts of other ways. People do die all the time, but I suspect the only person with a shorter average life span than a Free Energy researcher is an innocent Iraqi or a Washington DC Madam about to sing. ( Note: Even I have already forgotten the details on this curious recent Washington conspiracy involving the extremely lucky and timely deaths of a couple Washington D.C. Madams who were going to trial with their little black books wide open. Guess our ever watchful media watchdogs just lost the scent of scandal, lol.)

I can't remember which device caught my fancy as a suggested topic for the group first but Jean-Louis was usually tied up with his hands-on laboratory experiments or documenting; and his posts to the group were rare. He tended only to post when asked questions directly about his research. I don't know how to acknowledge the facts without appearing immodest but here it is. An unofficial mantel of sorts fell on me, not because I sought it, nor was it exclusively mine; but for some reason, I always knew where to point the group for seeming maximum effect. In the ether of cyberspace, it was like someone had appointed me guide for a tour group. Wherever my comments and questions took me, the whole JLNLabs egroup frequently followed.

Such was the case the day one member; Engineer, Russ Jones, posted a link to the Transdimensional Technologies website. I had a habit of going immediately to any link Russ posted, he was a wellspring of information of the best kind in the group, most of the frequent posting members were, but Russ was the most prolific of them. "The Lifter" was there. I came back into the group and posted, "Everyone, go immediately to the Transdimensional Technologies website!" The next thing we knew Jean-Louis was

posting info that he had replicated the device, complete plans and documentation were posted to the JLNLabs website, and the world wide "Lifter" phenomena was born; eventually culminating with 300 replications world wide, an article in Nexus magazine and videos posted to Youtube.

"The Lifter" (more info on Google, Youtube and JLNLabs.org) is an adaptation of an

effect discovered by T Townsend Brown. Philadelphia Project from Tesla.)

(Dr. Brown took over the infamous

This extremely light weight triangle of balsa,

aluminum foil, and a very tiny wire, when connected (Danger: High Voltage) to the High Voltage lead from a color TV or computer monitor; quietly and, seemingly miraculously, flies... without a motor, propeller, or jet. The Michael Couch Theory of lifter operation describes the mechanism of flight as an electrostatic attraction by charging a large mass of air above the device.

(Insert Figure no. 4 Lifter photos, drawings, video links here)

The JLNLabs egroup archive is an historical trail of the lifter development from the point of the discovery of the NASA contracted company's website to present day, wherein Saviour, of Blaze Labs (we never used his last name), holds the world record for lift by an electrostatic craft. Things seemed to have bogged down after that, as we all continue to work on building a self powered one that can carry the power supply and "fuel" needed to drive the device. Our common dream of the "Electric Flying Car" is stalled

temporarily as we work out this piece of the puzzle.

Chapter 4 Electrinium
One of the devices that most intrigued me is called "Electrinium" and it is useful to bring it up here, not only chronologically as events unfolded, but because it embodies the idea of Zero Point Energy extraction and one method of doing so. There is very little

documentation on the device. The only known prototype was reported to have exploded, but... the principle is sound and it is a Michael Couch favorite technology that has gotten the very least attention and therefore might be YOUR path to fame and fortune. (News flash, there is now a group dedicated to Electrinium on Overunity.com)

In the device, two dissimilar common metals (preferably the sludge from a battery, such as silver/nickel sludge) are melted in a crucible and then cooled under a seeded top layer of silicon which gives the device an electron flow direction. The resultant solid object is said to be able to generate 10,000 volts of electricity per cubic centimeter much the way a magnet generates magnetism (I'm told this class of device is called an Eletret but this particular device seems unique, or a whole field of Free Energy is going neglected.). Danger High Voltage, do not do this at home unless you really know exactly what you are doing and can assure your own safety when working with deadly high voltages.

What would make this device work? My take on it is... the molten metal mixture creates a crystal lattice such that the larger metal molecules are trapped between smaller

molecules which "squeeze" them, preventing them from establishing their normal electron valence. In other words, the same energy source, the quantum vacuum, zero point energy, what ever you want to call it; that keeps the atoms in your body spinning and the electrons orbiting around the nucleus of all matter; wants to restore every atom to its optimum electron valence situation.

When the smaller atom lattice prevents this because it is too tightly squeezing the larger atoms; the quantum energy keeps trying, energy flows from the vacuum, quantum foam, zero point, or ambient; attempting to push an electron out to that final valence orbit. Because there is no room, that energy is given up as electricity, or free electrons instead. And the process never stops, Thus, the electrinium device is a perpetual source of electrons like a magnet is a perpetual source of magnetism. Why hasn't anyone replicated this technology, or at least tried to do so? You got me. If I knew anything about integrated silicon circuit foundry operations, I would have done this years ago. I'm still looking for people with the right skill set to help me do this. When I sell enough books to be able to afford to hire those people, I will be replicating this device myself or at least my team of experts will be. (The new Overunity discussion appears to have such peope in it.)

Every single free energy device is capable of doing what Electrinium would do, transform the planet we live on, overnight. Poverty and hunger would vanish, people would have better health for numerous reasons, not the least of which, is the end of pollution from energy production and transportation. Every device that I'm going to

reveal to you from my personal journey has that capability. It doesn't even lay just outside our reach, it is here. Two things stop it; politics and money. One of the purposes of this book is to innumerate the many ways, the many technologies, available right now, to save the planet and its people, if we overthrow the dark minions of hell, who now control our politics and money, and restore democracy and freedom to the United States, or some other country where that would be more plausible to do.

The machinery of power is so completely setup in the United States of America as to mirror the status of Germany at the beginning of World War II. The people are oblivious to their status as much as those Jews were as they boarded the trains heading to the extermination camps. Why did no one question whether or not the son of Hitler's banker should become our CIA director and President, for God's sake? And his son become our President? Will "American" become a synonym for stupidity? If so "media" should become a synonym for betrayal and "journalist" for betrayer. The news media has not "let us down", it has sold us unto crucification. (This paragraph was written before Obama won the Presidency, I'm a little more optimistic as we wait for the inauguration.)

Who was given the watch care over our intelligence services lest they be taken over by forces such as Hitler's SS was, and the Russian KGB? What would happen if ours were? More importantly, what would happen AFTER they were so taken over? That is what we must decide, for that is where we are, now, Blackwater is here now. FEMA camps are here, now. 9/11 was the starting gun for our internment campaign. People have told me they have seen the box cars with shackles at the ready to haul away the resistant.

Enough about that, that is for the next book. First let's talk about our potential salvation. I want you to have your salvation before I explain to you your doom.

Chapter 5 An Embarrassment of Riches

Synergy is the word that comes to mind when I think of the early days of JLNlabs egroup. There grew a selection of very smart, creative people who either already were known leaders in the field or would become such in this group. Tim Ventura, the owner of AmericanAntiGravity website, Tim Hardwick and Joe Flynn, Stephan Hartman, Hector Perez the inventor of the Rotoverter, Doug Konzen or the Konehead Motor, and many other great researchers were the core group that carried the discussion along a wide highway with many broad side trips that seemed to each discover, or propel, a new technology for extracting Zero Point Energy.

The "Lifter" was also called an asymmetrically capacitor by Townsend and was often called that in discussions. That rabbit trail led us to something called the "C Stack". Another potential method of extracting Zero Point Energy. This one is easy to

understand. A capacitor is two large areas of metallic material that collects a charge of a large number of extra electrons on one electrode and positive holes on the other electrode. These are the forces acting on the Bell Jar experiments we've all seen in Jr.

High or High School Science classes. The Galvanometer, as it is called, is itself, a form of capacitor. Surely you remember from science class, if you didn't cut that day, rubbing plastic on a cloth and touching the round metal knob and the two leaves of foil that parted

and remained apart demonstrating the charge they held.

This charge can then be

discharged through a device providing power to it, much like a battery.

Electrostatic motors (do a youtube search for videos) are a form of capacitor experiment in which a static charge (like you get from rubbing your socks on the carpet) is used to drive a very light motor. This is a really cool experiment and I recommend you play with it. You can Google for detailed instructions on the construction of these motors.

(Insert Figure 5 Electrostatic motors)

The C Stack employs extra large metallic plates between the plus and minus electrodes, resulting in double, triple, or more, use of the same charges. Not having actually

experimented with these myself, for good reason, fear (Capacitors can store deadly amounts of energy); I leave it to people more educated and trained in experimentation with High Voltage devices, much like I do with Electrinium. But my guess is that it works like this...

Layers of electrodes are sandwiched between the plus and minus that are connected to the driving (power supplying) circuit, these power electrodes induce charges in the extra layers which can be tapped and used, or drained, through separate leads that run to batteries or circuits that do other work. I'd have to go back and study more to tell you whether are not these C-Stacks are run at resonance by AC or DC current but my guess is they can be either but should be in resonance for maximum efficiency, and would do

some amazing and possibly different things depending on whether you use AC or pulsed DC to drive them.

Truth is, I'd love to play with these, C-Stacks, but I wont be doing that until I can get someone like Bill Beaty, the High Priest of High Voltage, to work right by my sweaty, nervous, heart racing, trembling side. Wonder why I never thought to email Bill and ask him about C-Stacks? This is a perfect example of how things unfolded in these amazing egroups, there was always someone in the group who had a high degree of knowledge of any given field or had a close friend, or associate, with it. The group included a high ratio of knowledgeable academically educated engineers, scientists and teachers. who knew enough to have open minds about Zero Point Energy and not be taken aback by non-standard terminology of self-educated researchers who had discovered amazing things without the aid of the proper terms.

(Insert figure 6. diagram of C-Stack invention here)

Whenever anyone in the group found anything interesting on the Internet, in the media, trade journals or whatever that was innovative, there were always a keen group of sharp minds available in the group with the knowledge, if not the credentials, to analyze it effectively for the group. As in anything else, one thing always leads to another, and one great discovery would always lead to another. And anytime anyone got stumped or had a question in their own research there was always that same group of "experts" eager to help or expand the discussion.

A great aspect of the group was a lack of condemnation and strife, the gentlemanly respectful atmosphere that prevailed was conducive to people feeling at liberty to ask a stupid question without rebuke. Most of us were smart enough to acknowledge the potential stupidity of our question before, or as, we asked it, which helped buffer our egos in the event it actually was a stupid question. It seems that people who are really smart about a lot of different things realize that there are also a lot of different things that they themselves are not very smart or knowledgeable about.

I, for one, have found that the smarter men are, the more humble and self-effacingly they behave from the heart. It was a great pleasure and honor to have enjoyed the fellowship and friendship of that very special group of men. Thank you all, for being there and being the great men you are. I've never met any of them in person to this day. It would be quite interesting to someday have a "reunion" in person somewhere of the participating members of that early JLNLabs egroup, that would be cool.

I believe I even once said that my "job" in the group was that of serendipitous spark, I was pretty much the expert in nothing. I was the originator of questions, the learner, the questioning student most of the time. Sometimes, I was the finder, the bringer of cool useful stuff I found somewhere else. Often I seemed to be the person that caught a vision of a direction to go, a way to join this to that to make the other. I've often said that disorganization is a key ingredient in my creative process; the ability to let ideas and knowledge of various things and abilities of not quite obviously related items to bounce

around in close proximity until a non-obvious connection revealed itself; sort of a semifree associative process for divergent processes and parts. Edison said that to be an inventor one needed two things, a good imagination and a lot of junk. Well, my junk was mostly all in my head and my imagination was and is, at the very least, overactive.

There was an argument for Creation vs. evolution that described faith in evolution like throwing a bunch of watch parts into a case and shaking it until they fell in place and made a watch. In some sense that is what happens deliberately in my head. I believe what Einstein said about all ideas come from God. I think God shapes those ideas such that we get to play a huge, if not equal, part in the creation process, and that this semichaotic soup stirring of ideas and things is a gift process God gave me that has proved very fruitful so far. Sometimes I feel guilty for I believe my roll is and was the very most fun. I have often felt like the pauper in the "Prince and the Pauper" getting to play King, surrounded by dozens of amazingly capable people "some why" willing to lend me their considerable expertise.

The magic wand that was given me in this field is the warm humanitarian heart of these great knowledgeable men, their insight, and sacrifice in the search for solutions to problems of human suffering now and threatening in the near future. I felt much like a guest director of an orchestra. He has almost nothing at all to do with the music being created, all he does is cue the musicians and set the tempo, yet he takes most of the bows. He, himself, makes not one sound beyond the baton taps on the music stand that calls the orchestra to attention.

So, on to the music that will save this planet and our very own lives. Brooklynite, Irving Langmuir was a Nobel Prize winning scientist in Chemistry and prolific inventor with over 400 patents, most owned by General Electric. The one thing he invented, for which General Electric didn't want the patent, was the Mon-Atomic Hydrogen Generator. I don't remember who in the group found this first or if Jean-Louis brought it to us through his website but it was a great find.

Like Nikola Teslas wireless transmission of energy, to which JP Morgan said, "Where do I put the meter?" Langmuir's MAHG was the opposite of what an Energy Monopolist wants, it would give the world Free Energy. A thin tungsten element under .5

atmospheres of Hydrogen was discovered to generate more heat than was accounted for by the energy input into the device. Some people call this overunity. Jean-Louis

replicated the device and discovered it could generate up to 21 times the energy put into it. What could that do for a planet choking to death on fossil fuel fumes with 2 Billion people living in total poverty? If we had governments that didn't want things the way they are... (Check out the replication of this device on the JLNLabs.org website. It is very professionally documented there.)

(Figure 7. Picture of MAHG from JL Naudin and graph showing 2100% output inserted here)

Chapter 6 More Riches Motionless Electronic Generator

Tom Bearden was working on the Motionless Electronic Generator, Jean-Louis Naudin replicated that as well, and others on the group began attempts to replicate it. The Motionless Electronic Generator employs a similar principle to that which killed the cash registers I worked on in Knoxville, TN years ago... generating electricity by turning things on and off. Well, not exactly...

(insert Fig.8 MEG drawings or photos)

A thin very long copper wire is wound into an "output coil" and then mounted on a laminated special steel frame made of thin, flat MuMetal strips called lamination or a composite of epoxy and "black sand". This laminated "core" readily transmits magnet flux fields into the coil which picks up the movement of those flux field lines and turns them into electricity. How that happens is a really great question that I can't deal with yet myself, so I'm just going to say it is beyond the scope of this book. The truth is that modern science truly understands neither magnetism, nor electricity, nor gravity yet. In the MEG, as we call it, there is another coil of wire mounted in a gap in the lamination. This small coil is there to block or permit the flux field lines from a powerful "rare earth"

magnet, either stopping or allowing the flux fields lines, to reach the output coil, also called a pickup coil. Though the only thing being turned on and off rapidly is this small gate coil, the effect on the output or pickup coil is the same, the flux field appears and disappears across the coil wires very rapidly and in so doing generates electricity.

Remember all those flux fields from the Radio Shack magnets we held up to the TV screen or computer monitor a while back? Well the MEG just interrupts them from reaching the receiving coils that make electricity out of them and alternately lets them pass, very quickly. You can have all the flux field lines of force in the world saturating your coil and they wont generate any usable electricity for one reason, they aren't in motion. It is not the flux field that makes electricity in the wire, it is the MOVEMENT of the flux fields across the wire that makes electricity.

So by, blocking and passing the flux field through the legs of a transformer very quickly we are able to generate electricity, no magical mystery Zero Point Energy in that. The magic comes because the gating coil across the flux field path to the generating coil requires only a small portion of the magnetic power of the permanent magnet in order to move the permanent magnet's huge, flux field stream back and forth across the big power pick-up coil. So, by applying a small amount of electricity off and on to the gate coil, the much larger force of the permanent magnet is moved quickly across the coil wires for very little energy input. Like steering a large ship by turning a small wheel or tiller. Brilliant!

Chapter 7 Stirling Engines

Sometime in this time frame the Stirling Engine and Tesla Turbine came into the discussion. The Stirling Engine was invented in the early 1800's by preacher Robert Stirling. It is an external combustion engine that will run on any source of heat. Low Temperature Differential Stirlings can run on as little as 4 degrees Centigrade difference between the hot and cold sides. As far as I've been able to tell the mode of operation is this...

A volume of air is heated, the hotter the better, then a light displacer is moved into the area holding the hot air, usually dropped into it but it depends on the design. This moves most of the hot air into the cooling side of the engine away from the heat source. Like a 2 liter soda bottle sealed inside a warm house and then taken outside into the cold, the air contracts inside the cool area and creates a suction that pulls in a nearly air tight piston for a power stroke that moves the shaft around. The expansion of heat pushes the piston and the condensing of the air mass pull it.

I guess you could consider a 2 liter plastic bottle a Stirling Engine cycle device if you were heating and cooling it in rapid succession, though it would have no power off take to do any useful work. The shaft of a Low Temperature Differential, LTD, Stirling usually has a "cam", sometimes just two bends in a thick wire (often a coat hanger) that

are pointing 90 degrees apart on the shaft. The displacer, a very light large hollow or solid piece that fills the cylinder cavity about half way, requires little energy to move and displace the air between hot and cold sides of the engine.

(Insert Fig.9 Stirling Engine diagram or chart)

Either a weight or flywheel is employed to pull the shaft through its rotation, though often two stirling cylinders are joined on a shaft to complete each other's cycles for a full rotation. Though balancing the two cylinders completes the cycle rotation, a flywheel is often incorporated helping smooth the operation and build up torque. The Tin Can Stirling which is widely replicated in videos on Youtube, has a surprising strength once it gets started. These engines are often powered with a candle, or sterno, or a small oil burner but waste heat and sunlight, or any other heat or cold source, will run a Stirling if it is designed right..

(Insert Figure 10 Laminar Stirling pictures and diagrams here)

There are several advantages to Stirling Engines...

1. They will run off any source of heat and/or cool. 2. In some Low Temperature Differential Stirlings only the part (if any) of the engine that is in contact with the heat source needs to be made of a heat withstanding material. 3. Apparently any mechanical method can be employed in a Stirling Engine as long as the

hot and cold sides are operated effectively 90 degrees apart from each other. It can be built in any shape or configuration as long as these parameters are met. 4. Cheap, readily available materials may be used in their construction. Including cans and bottles (even plastic ones) that were destined for the trash pile. This is ideal for bringing the power of engines to applications in third world countries for power, irrigation, and transportation. Many models can run on sunlight, directly and most can run on sunlight if concentrated with Fresnel Lenses or aimed mirrors.

(Insert fig 11. drawing of Fresnel lense and CD Mirror Board. A website I found described a large concentrating mirror made with old CD's mounted by screws to a 4' x8' sheet of plywood that worked extremely well to concentrate sunlight to lethal levels. Try to relocate that site and paste its URL here.)

5. Design parameters are not very stringent, in fact, a loose fit is best for the displacer because it allows the air to move from hot to cold side and back with minimal resistance and drag on the engine.

6. Stirling designs can be scaled to any size large or small easily, so almost any cylinder will work if you find appropriate sized pistons that fit within reason. (Google Idaho Stirling.) I have seen ridiculously small Stirling Engines that would sit in a Doll's hand but there would be no heat from that hand on which for it to run.

7. (Insert Fig.12 Idaho Stirling photo)

7. Efficiency of a Stirling is often improved by using a "regenerator" which stores some of the heat to help reheat the air medium after the cooling side has done its work. Often the regenerator is incorporated into the displacer itself to do both things in one part for example by filling a can with stainless steel dish scrubbers that can both insulate the cool side from the hot side, displace the air, and trap some of the heat for reuse on the hot side.

I like to send people to look at the "Idaho Stirling Engine" because it is made of such common trash. The parts are soda bottles, a tupeware container, a soda can, wire, a sponge and a light bulb. That particular engine is run off of a 100W light bulb but it is a great illustration of the flexibility of Stirling Design and how inexpensive they can be.

I may be wrong, but the sound of the engine running the African Queen in the old Humpfree Bogart film sounds exactly like the Stirling engine and is from the right time period when they were still popular and widely available. My guess is that it is a Stirling but I have not verified that.

Stirlings fell out of use, probably due to the lack of the ability to accelerate rapidly like the gasoline internal combustion engine. As we have now learned the ecological need for electric hybrids; Stirlings may become popular as driver motors for generators to charge battery banks and drive electric motors while recharging the batteries. The batteries act as a buffer, providing the extra power to the electric motor for bursts of acceleration and recharging during normal operation when less power is being required by the electric

motors.

My Yahoo egroup, BeSTKGenset, is dedicated to helping develop Stirling and Tesla Turbine generator sets using Hydroxy from super efficient electrolysis as the fuel to drive the Stirling Engine or Tesla Turbine. (The S1r9a9m9 system may also power a Tesla Turbine, though probably not able to power a Stirling.) Other engines, such as Wankle and Bourk, that are more efficient than the 17-19% efficient internal combustion engine are also consider in the forum (though my favorites are mysteriously disappearing from the Internet; Camdyne [uncertain spelling] is gone, Myt is dwindling and silent, Quasiturbine is hard to find, the Ceramic Engine was forgotten before the Internet came along). Youtube.com has many videos of homemade Stirling Engines as well as some machined ones and some professionally manufactured ones. Many of them can run from the heat from the human hand holding them, or from the heat of a cup of coffee or the cool from a few ice cubes.

Japanese students once held annual Stirling Engine Rallies where their designs entered into competition with each other for various prizes and recognition. Other schools

around the world are beginning to recognize the value of the Stirling Engine and hold similar competitions. Perhaps the most useful info on the Stirling Engine is a chart that I found that delineates all the parameters for designing a Stirling Engines dimensions on one chart with their ratios per the other dimensions.

(Fig. 13. Stirling Chart - Locate this chart and get permission to include it here or post a

figure with the ratios of the dimensions label on a picture of an LTD Stirling)

The key dimension is the displacer cylinder diameter, this is the cylinder that is heated and holds the displacer, you can select all the other dimensions as they relate to each other. Whatever your DCD (displacer cylinder diameter), the displacer cylinder length, DCL, should be 1/8 to 1/10th of the DCD. The Displacer Height, DH, is 64.5% of DCL. The Displacer Clearance, DC, width of the ring of empty space around the displacer, is 3.6 % of the DCD divided by 2. The displacer diameter, itself, DD is DCL minus 2 times the DC. Here is the formula.

The Power Piston Diameter, PPD, should be 1/10th of the DCL and the Power Piston Cylinder inside diameter, PPID, is the same as the PPD for a tight fit to create suction. The Power Piston Stroke, PPS, is 1.25 times the DCL.

DCD = Displacer Cylinder Diameter = You pick this DCL = Displacer Cylinder Length = between DCD/8 and DCD/10 DH = Displacer Height = 64.5% of DCD DC = Displacer Clearance = 3.6% of DCD divided by 2 PPD = Power Piston Diameter = DCL/10 PPID = Power Piston Cylinder Diameter = PPD PPS = Power Piston Stroke = 1.25 times DCL

Put these formula into a spreadsheet and print out a range of dimensions. This way if you

find an object (usually a can or metal tube) that will make a great cylinder or displacer, you will know what dimension to look for in the other parts. Or any part you find that is perfect for a cold piston, displacer, or, hor or cold cylinder; you've got a chart of all the other part dimensions you need to turn it into a Stirling Engine.

A great way to introduce students to the Stirling Engine might be to have a race using those super simple Stirling Board Racers that can be found on the Japanese Stirling site. (see picture of one above). These super simple vehicles are made using a balloon, Stainless Scrubber, some aluminum foil, a tiny glass bottle or cutoff test tube bottom and a stump to bounce upon. When the foil covering the back of the bottle or test tube is heated, the balloon starts to bounce on the stump underneath it, shuttling the scrubber back and forth; displacing the air inside. The force of the bounce scoots the flat body along a smooth surface. In this configuration of the Stirling Engine, the Stainless Steel Scrubber acts as both a displacer and a regenerator.

Last year, George Bush, signed his energy bill at a Sun farm in California that used mirrors to direct sunlight onto a high tech Stirling Engine. A state of the art Swiss (or is it Swedish?) submarine is also powered by a Stirling Engine. This technology is proven and not just for toys. Actually it was superior to the ubiquitous Internal Combustion Engine in almost every aspect, except acceleration. Considering ecological concerns, it is vastly superior.

Chapter 8 The Paper Tesla Turbine Engine

Nikola Tesla, the man who gave us the AC power grid, alternator, three phase electric motors that powered the industrial revolution, and the coil that sparks the plug in your Internal Combustion Engine auto; said that the Tesla Turbine was his greatest invention. He claimed that the Tesla Turbine could generate 25 times more power than any other engine on Earth at the time, including aircraft engines, 10 horsepower per pound of motor. That means a ten pound motor could power your automobile. In 1962, our Ford Falcon wagon 6 cylinder engine, which had 101 HP, would have been replaced by a 10.1 pound Tesla Turbine by that claim. A 1000 HP Tesla Turbine could drive a small ocean liner and would only weight as much as a petite cheerleader, 100 lbs. It is one of life's mysteries; why these two technologies, Stirling and Tesla Engines coupled with Electric motors, are not already applied to the majority of the worlds transports and energy applications.

I often found myself drooling over the Tesla Turbine and dreaming of making one.

assumed that it would require a precision bearing and shaft and machined discs attached to that shaft. Then one day I was searching the Internet for Tesla Turbines, there were very few sites at that time, and I came across "the Paper Tesla Turbine". Now, there was a material I could locate and manipulate. The author of the article, Samuel Falvo had constructed a Tesla Turbine from the empty boxes of microwave entres, a pencil and a

pizza box (Pictures are on the Pheonix Tesla Society website).

He built it at his office desk and powered it by blowing into it through a straw. When he started showing it to his fellow employees, it generated a lot of excitement, wonder and interest. People would bring their own straws so they could blow into it and feel it wind up to speed. When people tried to stop the Paper Tesla Turbine they often exclaimed a few surprise syllables at the torque the "motor" had. Hopefully this paragraph in this book will launch a world wide craze of Paper Tesla Turbine experimenting. Many paper airplanes are more complicated than the Paper TT.

(Inser Fig. 14 Paper Tesla Turbine)

Needless to say, I stopped dreaming of building Tesla Turbines and built one of these. Actually, I built three of them. The first one was not very good, the second one was little better but they both worked. I gave them both away to amazed fans. For my third attempt, I wanted a slightly more durable material. So, I went down to my local 99 cent store and purchased some vinyl notebook binders, the translucent kind without cardboard stuffing.

I went to a local plastics fabricator and got them to cut me a couple inch section of the largest diameter clear plastic tubing they had, for a few dollars. I cut my discs out of the vinyl to make a close fit but very slightly oversize for the inside of the tube. I attached the discs to a hand held drill and turned them down to a near perfect fit for the tube, by

using a knife against the spinning outer edge of the disc pack. I also picked up a couple square flat pieces of clear plastic for the end caps for the tube. I drilled holes in the end caps for my "shaft straw", holes near the center shaft hole in one end cap for exhaust and placed tiny pieces of double sided sticky tape between the vinyl discs.

Then I drilled a tangent angle hole in the side of the tube near the end oposite the output-hole-end-cap for my input straw. My tube and end caps were held together by a couple bolts and wing nuts outside the tube circumference through the rectangle's ears in an easy to adjust configuration. Using my lungs and the straw held at a tangent to the tube's inner surface, I blew into the input hole such that the stream of my breath caught the very edge of the disc pack. It took me a few tries to center the tube in respect to the disc assembly but once it was centered it easily wound up to an estimated 3000 rpm on two breaths per second over a few seconds.

Speaking of serendipity, just when I needed it, I found a digital gas pressure gage (a $200 device) used by professionals, lying on the sidewalk across from my "lab". I bought a new battery for it and measured the strength of my lungs. The most pressure I could generate either blowing or sucking into the device was 2 PSI (pounds per square inch). Your tires run on 26-35 PSI and a bicycle tire is usually 65 PSI. This Tesla Turbine would run an estimated 3000 rpm on two 2 PSI breaths per second. And once it got going good it had some decent torque, too! (Having torgue means it is hard to stop and powerful for useful work.)

My fascination with Tesla Turbines has only grown as time has gone by and I've learned more and more about them. They are used commercially as pumps in agriculture and industry by reversing input and output, then turning the shaft with a motor; and they have superior qualities in this application. They can pump mixtures of solids and liquids with ease, more efficiently than other pumps. Hhhmmmmm, we should look into buying the Tesla Pumps and turning them into Tesla Motor. I'll be right back. A brief tour of the Web only turned up one possibility somewhere in the orient. I've emailed them for information.

Tesla Turbines are having a resurgence much like the Stirling Engine but it is catching on much more slowly. As of now, I only know of two serious commercial makers; The Phoenix Tesla Society, and Frank Germano. But a recent googling of the term Tesla Turbine brought up 669,000 URLs. So, there's plenty happening in the field these days, though many of those sites may be references to Tesla's other work or the new Tesla Electric Car named for him.

The Phoenix site offers to build one with an internal generator for you for $7,000. I think that is very steep myself but maybe they are trying to raise the funds for mass production. I'm sure there was a lot of research and development they are trying to recoup. Their site is a wonderful resource for anyone wanting to learn about Tesla Turbines.

There is a video on Youtube of a tesla turbine mounted on top of a pressure cooker on a stove turning some jet-engine-sounding rpms that the reader might enjoy. There are,

also, videos of Tesla Turbines made of common CDs. These are fun to play with but you should know that CDs can not withstand the high speeds generated by the Tesla configuration and eventually fly apart. Watch your eyes and stand well back when you run them up to speed. But the best videos are of the Tesla Turbines made from old hard disk drive platters. These seem to be the ideal material with which to build small experimental Tesla Turbines. If only they were 6 or 8 in diameter, we could use them to build some serious generators for home poer generation and transportation applications.

A respected member of the BeSTKGenset says that Tesla Turbines run optimally at around 25,000-30,000 rpm. That is faster than the speed of an electric router. Keep that in mind. There is another video on Youtube of a small tesla turbine turning 45,000 rpm on about 20PSI of air, impressive. Tesla Turbines are also called "Bladeless Turbines". The potential benefit to mankind and especially in reducing our dependence on fossil fuel by using Stirling Engines and Tesla Turbines is so great that I'm amazed that these systems are not being taught in high school. Shame on the school that doesn't start a Stirling AND a Tesla Turbine program immediately.

Given their ease of construction and the amazing demonstrations that can be made by hand by the students themselves, it would seem that every decent teacher worth their salt would be incorporating these devices in their instructional programs. I can think of no better way to get a student of any age excited about science and mathematics.

I always supposed that the disc platters as they come in hard drives were too wide apart to function as a Tesla Turbine. Guess what, I was wrong. There is a video on Youtube of someone aiming an air hose at the slot on the bottom of a standard disk drive and it works (the slot is under metallic tape). Apparently all multiplatter hard disc drives are already Tesla Turbines. Of course this is not an optimized Tesla Turbine but it illustrates the principle of operation. I eventually took several disk drives and took the platters out, removed the spacers and reassembled them into one modified case with smaller air gaps between platters.

I used JB Weld to fashion a very crude "air fence" around the discs replaced the cover with a piece of plastic so I could observe better. Then I mounted a pneumatic fitting for attaching an air hose that would blow across the outer edges of the platter assembly. Since the disk drive motor is still attached, it will probably generate power, making a very easy to build demonstration of generating power with a Tesla Turbine. At least the one on Youtube did.

The focus of my present work is in devising a system for burning Hydroxy in both Stirling and Tesla engines to run a Lenzless generator. We'll talk about those generators in another chapter; but right now I wanted to expand a little bit on Hydroxy just so we can put the two together mentally for effective consideration here. Hydroxy is the term assigned to the gas you get when separating water into Hydrogen and Oxygen. If one designs well with it in mind, this gaseous mixture can contain a decent percentage of MonAtomic Hydrogen atoms like those responsible for the overunity in the Langmire

device discussed earlier. MonAtomic Oxygen might also be in the mix as well as other isotopes of Hydrogen and Oxygen.

This gaseous mixture changes over time, but initially, if done right, it contains a very powerful mix of these MonAtomic Atoms and extra charges. When this mixture is combusted soon enough after creation; it is very powerful. A teaspoon of bubbles exploded too near a person, could damage your hearing. A small balloon exploded in an urban neighborhood will result in a patrol car coming to your door. Believe me your neighbors will notice.

That is why so many researchers are experimenting with Hydroxy right now. It has the potential to end our dependence on fossil fuels, give us free energy and clean the atmosphere and water, all at the same time. Did you know that the original car ran on Hydroxy, not gasoline?

Anyway, there are only a couple tricky problems to be solved before Hydroxy replaces gasoline and diesel in all our cars and generators. How do we produce enough of it on demand to run our vehicles? And how do we keep it from "flashing back". The

flashback problem is due to the fact that both the fuel, Hydrogen, and the oxidizer, Oxygen, are thoroughly mixed in the gas in the perfect ratio for explosion. All that is required for that explosion is enough heat or a spark. Both of these problems already have solutions but better solutions would be... better.

We can make enough Hydroxy to run the car if we build a big enough Electrolyzer or Hydroxy Generator; but a better solution would be to come up with an aerogel metal electrode of nickel, silver, or Stainless Steel. These foams have many times more surface area exposed to the electrolyte and should generate ten times or more Hydroxy than the current standard 316 Stainless flat plates and tubes being used in the best of the popular ones today. If anybody wants to send me a couple sheets of these hard to come by aerogel metal foams, please do. (Update: Recently Bob Boyce posted a video of The Cell, his latest design, that produces 30 Liters per minute of Hydroxy. Frank Roberts claims to run a Ford Focus on 30 Liters per minute of Hydroxy alone.)

Flashbacks are controlled (barely) using bubblers. These are just bottles, cylinders, jugs, tubes, etc. of distilled water or electrolyte that are separated from the Cell, as we call our actual electrolyzer boxes or tubes.

When a flashback occurs with a bubbler in line; the fire can't get through the water in the bubbler, unless it can step from one bubble to the next. So, as long as the bubbles have a little water separating them it works well. In an engine it works well enough but those of us who are keen on playing with the other fantastic properties of Hydroxy gas; like melting rocks, bricks, any metal on earth, welding, etc.; a bubbler isn't quite the total solution.

We'd like to be able to block a flashback before it gets to where our hands are holding

onto the welding handle part. It probably isn't really dangerous that way, but it is unnerving to watch an explosion flash back past your hand. The flame speed is so great, and fortunately the amount in the hose is so small, that it hasn't been known to cause any injuries yet, that I know of; just some soiled undies.

Other fuels are controlled mostly by limiting access to oxidizer until one is ready to explode the fuel. This is why knowledgeable researchers work with Hydroxy on

demand instead of trying to store any sizable amount of it. Before you make Hyrdoxy, it is as safe as water, it is water! Imagine all future car crashes resulting in ruptured water tanks instead of rupture gasoline tanks. Every person who ever lost a loved one to a fiery car crash should be suing the auto industry for delaying these technologies. Aren't most airplane crash victims killed in the fire? Avoidable, all of those burn deaths were avoidable if these technologies weren't suppressed.

Since Hydroxy is so ready for combustion, extreme care must be taken to prevent sparks and to deny enough heat getting back to the Hydoxy source such as an electrolyzer box. Hydroxy also has magical properties when applied to any material. It seems to adjust its flame temperature to the material it is applied against, such that it is able to turn any metal, even stone, into a molten pool. I'm told you can weld a nail to a rock with a tiny Hydroxy flame. This opens up all kinds of wonderful avenues in home manufacturing. Hydrogen torches are used in Jewelry for this reason. (Videos are available on Youtube, enter Hydroxy Torch into the search window.)

That ability to melt metals is also problematic when you are considering using it as a fuel inside or outside of a metal engine. Fortunately one can add air, water, mist or fog to moderate this propensity to melt the metals of your motor. This is where we are right now in this research, trying to determine, what mixture of Hydroxy, Air and Water can be injected by what means, in what size combustion chamber, at what timing setting, to maximize the power derived while not melting the engine itself?

One other aspect that bears mentioning here though out of chronological order (This is a new area of my research) is Pulse Detonation vs. Deflagration. Deflagration is the slow burn of the gas stove. Detonation is the explosion with the acoustic percussiveness of boom or pop, caused allegedly by the flame front exceeding the speed of sound. I'm told that in your car detonation is what often is happening to the gas when your gas engine "diesels" or knocks when timing is wrong, otherwise it uses deflagration as designed.

Currently using Hydroxy to "boost" engine performance and mileage is all the rage. I was in the Hydroxy, Watercar, and Workingwatercar egroup this past year as the "Smack Booster" was developed by Eletrik1 (real name withheld for security reasons, MIB and all), reportedly the best booster out there now (ooops, been superceeded by the GenIV Smack design). Reports are 20-40% mileage increase with a Smack Booster. (Yes, you should Google it or go to www.smacksboosters.110mb.com, get one or more, and start saving money now, while we work out the details of 100% Hydroxy auto operation). There will be another chapter about these things in detail, I just wanted to mention boosting because it ties in to our detonation discussion. (Note, the Tero/Boyce DryCell

or Smack GenIV have better performance than the Smack Boosters now. variations or Bob Boyce designs.)

All are

According to Electrik1, when boosting your gas engine with Hydroxy, if you add more than 3 liters/min., or so, to the gas, the timing of the engine has to be altered because of the increase flame front propagation of the Hydroxy. Smack Boosters generally put out 1.7 l/m, so running two would be the max before timing alteration would be required (Electrik1 has reduced the heating of his Smack Boosters and now runs them at about One Liter/minute instead of 1.7). When boosting or trying to run on 100% Hydroxy one must consider the flame front propagation speed or you get detonation instead of deflagration and you could burn or blow your pistons out among other catastrophes. (One researcher is now reporting an experiencial 400ml as a maximum before timing starts working against his vehicle depending on other driving conditions in standard timing operation of his auto's engine over test runs.)

Detonation may sound like a bad thing so far but consider this, detonation releases more energy faster and much of the energy in fuels used in cars is wasted due to the slow burn taking place before and after the optimum leverage crankshaft position of the piston rod. In other words, in a gas engine, the gas is ignited well before the piston is ready to go down and continues way past the optimum leverage point for transferring energy to the crankshaft. Hydroxy's fast flame front means that it is more able to optimize the power transfer to the crankshaft by burning more complete in the small window of opportunity in each rotation. The trick would be to maximize detonation without damaging the

engine and in the proper timing. Who knows what fuel efficiency numbers we could reach doing this. Some of us, me included, believe that Detroit has been purposefully dis-engineering its auto engines to NOT use detonation in obedience to their Oil/Energy/Banking overlords greedy directives.

My current efforts are aimed at finding out if we can use pulse detonation of Hydroxy to drive Tesla Turbines in our BeSTKGenset design. The Tesla Turbine seems especially suited for detonation as the explosion doesn't take place in the discs or blades (no blades used in a Tesla Turbine) and timing is probably not very critical to its operation. When I was blowing into my plastic and paper Tesla Turbines, I discovered that blowing longer, slower wouldn't accelerate the discs. Blowing harder in pulses did. So, my reasoning is that if we can pulse detonate the Hydroxy in the right amounts, we will get optimum speed and power out of it for fuel used, much like the difference between spinning up a bicycle tire by slapping it now and then, vs. winding up your arm to the velocity you want holding on to the tire. Both methods might work but which do you think would take the most energy out of you?

Chapter 9 Build Your Own Pulse Motors

Youtube has a video demonstration of a Bedini Pulse Motor that creates energy as it runs. Read that sentence again, it is probably one of the most important sentences you will ever read. What does it mean? It means this motor creates (really, extracts from the Zero Point Energy) energy instead of using it up. This video could be the turning point in the death of our planet, if enough people see it and understand the importance of it.

As I'm writing this, Obama and McCain are nearing the election and neither one has mentioned these technologies, though I am certain many people have informed both about them. This is a source of great concern to me. Neither has called for new 9/11 investigations, nor has either denounced the New World Order. I'm hoping that one or both are playing possum just to get elected and THEN save our country from the New World Order/Oil/Energy/Banking conspirators.

In the video a motor is connected to a circuit and a storage capacitor. The builder spins the magnet gently and the motor runs up to speed. As the motor runs it charges the capacitor. The builder then discharges the capacitor, wasting its charge; and reconnects

it. It builds up again. Energy problem solved. All we have to do is scale up this device and replicate it all over the world. But there is no reason to do it with this one device. There are innumerable ways to tap into the Zero Point Energy, just don't expect any university or research facility that gets any of its funding from oil or energy companies to develop them, not gonna happen. They are too busy doing what makes them money, spreading ancient myths about energy that keep engineers from building these devices.

When a nine year old school girl won her science fair with a replication of the Bedini Motor, it became known as "The School Girl Motor" or The Bedini School Girl Motor. I think people liked the idea that, not only was free energy doable, it was so easy a school girl could do it. There are vendors offering kits that replicate this motor, Google it.

(Insert Fig. 15 Bedini Motor diagram, photo or drawing)

So, how do you build a Bedini Pulse Motor? A Bedini uses the least energy possible to drive the rotor around. The very simplest version is also one of the world's simplest electric motors. All you need is a long plastic coated single strand wire, two paper clips, two pieces of tape, a strong magnet and a battery (1.5V C, D, A, or AA work well.... 9 Volt batteries don't work well for some reason, probably low amps).

(Fig 16. World's simplest motor drawing or photo)

Cut two short pieces of the wire for connections. Wind the rest of the wire into a tight dough nut "rotor coil" that is approximately the same diameter as your magnet length (I

use Radio Shack rectangular Cobalt/Sumarium magnets 1x1.75x.5 or so). Looping each end around the "rotor coil" to hold its shape leaving about one inch outside the loop on either side. Bend the paper clips, looping two arms, to form a stand that will hold the wire "rotor shaft ends. Clean the insulation off of all the ends of the connecting wires. On the "rotor coil" just clean one half of each end such that contact with the stand when connected to the battery will only give power to the rotor coil when it is vertical. Of the four possible positions of vertical and horizontal, power should only go through the coll in one position of the vertical two.

Connect the battery to the paper clip stand ( I tape the stand clips to a table first.) Mount the rotor coil in the stand such that it can turn freely while supported by both end pieces sticking through the stand arm holes. One design of this attaches the magnet to the battery and paperclips all at once, illiminating the need for additional wires, letting the paper clips conduct the electricity from battery to the rotor coil.

When you gently spin the coil it will make connection across the battery and power the coil making it turn to an horizontal position with respect to the magnet. In turning though, the connection is broken by the insulated part of the wire ends, this makes the charge on the coil collapse reversing the poles of the coil. The coil spins to position itself opposite to the magnet as the charge fades. The momentum keeps the coil turning until it makes contact across the battery and the whole process starts again each revolution.

The genius of this pulse motor is two fold. One, because the movement of the coil

disconnects the power to it, the minimum power is extracted from the battery to keep it moving and two, the Back Electromotive Force or BEMF is utilized in powering the motor's other half cycle per revolution. The BEMF is very nearly equal to the power of the initial Electromotive Force that pushes most motors.

More sophisticated versions of the Pulse Motor use one of several posible semiconductors, a relay switch or magnetic switch called a Hall Effect Device that allows you to minimize the pulses to the coil even more and to tailor that pulse exactly and capture the energy being used to power the motor in capacitors that are "non-reflectively" connected to the "load" (work being done). Non-reflectively just means connected in a way that doesn't put them in the circuit at the same time, or blocks via switching, resistance, or capacitance, the direction of the flow back to the original load source.

The battery is connected to push the current through the coil for 1/2 the revolution but the capacitor is connected to capture the collapsing coil energy for the second 1/2 of the revolution. So, as the motor runs it builds up power in the capacitor. Sophisticated circuitry can then reuse this power that was stored in the capacitor to recharge the battery or run the motor, or for something else.

According to famous Free Energy advocate and Motionless Energy Generator inventor, Tom Bearden the whole problem with the way our present devices use energy is that they are engineered to destroy the "magnetic dipole" that creates the energy in the first place. His theories say that as long as we don't destroy that dipole, the energy will continue to

flow from the vacuum from which all energy and matter come.

The Apostle Paul said, "By faith we know that things which are, are made of things that do not appear." Did you know that all matter is blinking in and out of existence at a very high frequency all the time? Weird, huh? Have you ever wondered how electrons can continuously orbit atoms? Where do they get their energy for their "perpetual motion"? Zero Point Energy is the energy that you have even if you reduce the temperature to absolute zero, a total absence of heat. Where does Zero Point Energy come from? Science has yet to definitively answer this question which would also probably answer from whence matter comes.

College educated engineers and scientists, except the quantum physicists, from the old school will tell you that perpetual motion is impossible. But Newton's laws say, "An object in motion tends to remain in motion unless another force acts upon it." Sounds like perpetual motion to me. Here on Earth we have an exception to the reality in most of the known Universe, we have friction and gravity, another force acting upon our perpetual motion objects.

Even these forces can't seem to stop the electron from orbiting nor the atom from spinning. Notice Newton didn't say, an object at rest will remain at rest unless a force acts upon it, wonder why. Truth is, there is no such thing as an object at rest, anywhere in the known Universe. You can lay down and go to sleep but you are not be completely at rest. You are traveling 32,000 miles/24hrs. = 1,300 m/h around the Earth plus

93,000,000 miles/(365 x 24) around the Sun, and that doesn't include the spin around the Universe and the expansion of it. You are really moving very, very, very, fast. And then there are all the electrons in your body orbiting all the spinning atom nuclei. Exactly where is this rest that makes perpetual motion impossible? So, why does everyone have so much faith in a relative lack of motion? Seems totally unfounded to me.

Back to the Pulse Magnet Motor... There are several such free energy motors, the Edwin Gray Motor, the Adams Motor, Moray King had one, Doug Konzen, Bill Muller, Lutec, Joseph Newman and probably a few others have also made Pulse Motors. There is also Hector Perez Torres invention, the Rotoverter. This isn't even a unique motor design, it is just a method of connecting and running standard three phase electric motors.

(Fig. 17 The Rotoverter diagram or photo)

I will leave the exact wiring diagram to be found on Hector's website or in the EVGray Yahoo egroup files section. But the general method of operation is this. You remove the heavy grease from two identical 3HP - 7.5 HP 3 Phase electric motors. The "prime mover" is wired such that it runs on regular 110 AC house current with a start capacitor. The second motor is attached shaft to shaft with the first one. After power up of the prime mover the start capacitor is switched out of the circuit. What you then have is one motor running on as little as 40 watts, turning another motor at resonance from which as much as 1,500 watts can be extracted. The math says this is overunity, 40 watts in, 1,500 watts out. A COP = 35.7, or ~3500% increase in energy, 35 times more out than in.

What does that mean for this dieing planet?

Hector says that the Rotoverter is just a demonstration to prove his theories, he has bigger and better things to teach us if the "powers that be" don't kill him before we get him the funding he needs to build them. This Rotoverter has been replicated, or verified, by sixteen different people last time I checked. That doesn't mean the sixteen people saw Hector demonstrate it, it means sixteen different people built the device themselves and tested it separately, verifying its claims.

Why aren't our government and our industries bringing us these technologies? YOU haven't forced them to do it yet, that is why. Until the People take this government back, it won't happen. The only other way it can happen is that you do it for yourselves. (Now that Barack Obama has been elected we will see if that really means that the people have taken back their government. So far, he has selected way too many Washington insiders for my comfort. I sure hope he isn't just the next undercover New World Order operative President.)

Early on in the JLNlabs egroup Butch LaFonte posted a link to his video. In this video Butch used a simple device to illustrate a principle that he discovered. Using two rulers and four magnets, he attached two magnets in attraction mode, north to south, and two in repel mode, north to north (or south to south) in a scissors configuration attached to the ends of the rulers. Then he showed that though the magnets were very powerful;

separating them could be done by a gentle push from one finger, as the force attracting

the one pair was balanced by the force pushing the other two apart.

This principle is used in both permanent magnet only Free Energy Motors, and the Konehead, Muller and Adams electric motors. In the Konzen and Muller motors,

magnets of the same polarity are used on each side of the drive coils to cancel the Lenz Force or the Back EMF that is responsible for the drag on electric motors, also, the BEMF is collected for reuse resulting in overunity of the Muller motor and super efficiency at least in the Konzen motor.

I've had a 9 volt battery running the crude motor I described earlier for days without BEMF capture and reuse. But the true potential in these technologies comes from combining them. That is why I started the BeSTKGenset yahoo egroup. But I get ahead of myself.

Chapter 10 The Hydroxy Story

The JLNLabs egroup was scouring the world for workable Free Energy devices, so, finding the Carl Cella Water Car System was just another day at the office, so to speak. Carl Cella was part of an 80's rock band called Rampage, I can't tell you what their hit was but I think they had at least one. What was a hit with me was his claim that he was running his car completely on water. We discussed this system on the group but were skeptical. That is until one of us, maybe me, I forget who, ran across a short video clip on the web (which I am still trying to relocate) that showed electrolysis of water at a pulse rate of 1200 cps.

The water was practically jumping out of the clear container that held it and the two screw electrodes that carried the current into the container. The difference in the Obviously the

energetic reaction at 1,200 cps and other frequencies was dramatic.

frequency of operation was key to maximizing the reaction. This had been the claim of the Carl Cella system. Though Carl hadn't specified what the frequency was, his system allowed one to tune across the frequencies to find the maximum production.

The Carl Cella system required a lot of hand built circuitry, so though we all talked about

it from time to time no one we know of has replicated it. The system came up frequently in our discussions and many of us dreamed of the day we had the time, money, equipment, car or whatever we lacked to build a replication.

Eventually, someone brought the efforts of an egroup called Egas to our attention. I joined that group and began to neglect others, including a couple free energy groups (the momentum of the Free Energy movement had transferred itself to these Free Energy Groups over a period of months for some reason) and the JLNLabs egroup which had dwindled to near silence by then. Initially we were talking about replicating the Cella system and the Stanley Meyers system. Bill Lawton and "Tero Rant" were making headway and approaching some serious Hydroxy production with their systems when fellow researcher Bill Williams came into the forum with some Earth shaking news.

We had been mentioning the Joe Cell or Joe X system off and on. Most of us thought it was a total hoax because of the claim that the device ran off of Orgone Energy (another name for Zero Point Energy). As opposed to using the Hydroxy (Brown's gas, H H O, hho, etc.). While we could have easily taken it seriously as an electrolyser because it would obviously produce Hydroxy well, and did, the claim that the pipe containing the Hydroxy went to a "blind plug" rather than into the carburetor of the engine threw us for a loop. Some speculated that because Hydrogen was the smallest atom, maybe it was going right through the metal engine and finding its way into the cylinder, but that was just silly.

Because the realities of the Joe Cell are so contra to our perception of reality, I will go into Hydroxy here first instead, even though the chronology is out of sequence. We will come back to the Joe Cell later in this chapter. I refocused my efforts on to Hydroxy after thoroughly researching the Joe Cell because there were aspects of Joe Cellery, as we called it, that meant that successful replication was always going to be more difficult than dependable, the Y factor. Apparently your Chi can stop the Joe Cell from working. If you are counting on your car to get you to work, you've installed a Joe Cell and you get up grumpy; you probably wont make it to work. So, I turned my attention back to methods that would be more dependable for every one, raining on the just and the unjust, the good, the bad and the ugly, Hydroxy.

As things progressed in the Hydroxy research in the Egas Yahoo egroup, people were trying to replicate Meyers cells and experimenting with flat plate cells trying to produce quantities of Hydroxy that could run an automobile or a generator. Some people were building really big Cells with as many as 60 individual electrolyser cells in the overall unit. We tended to use the word cell for both a single pair of electrodes making Hydroxy and for the complete system unit no matter how many pairs of electrodes were in it.

The best success reported, and there was evidently a lot of success going unreported, was a 60 cell unit that powered a car, up on blocks, to 60 mph on the speedometer. We kept expecting a follow up report but none came. Eventually I began to ask one of the group members if he would allow me to come and look at his completed cell because he lived near my son in Tennessee. I was going to see my son and wanted us to work on cells

together. Bob Boyce graciously consented to a visit.

I thought that I was just going to get a first hand look at a completed generic electrolyzer unit. I had been studying these systems for quite awhile and had many cutting edge questions in my mind about them. To my amazement, Mr. Boyce, not only understood all my questions, he had all the answers to them. Within a few minutes talking to Bob, I realized, he was "the Master" of Hydroxy. I hadn't realized that Bob was the same person who had had his car up on blocks running at 60 mph off of his 60 cell electrolyzer. Somehow, I had never connected the two together.

Bob showed me the control circuit he had designed to power his electorlyzer with three separate frequencies 10,700 Hz; 21,400 Hz; and 42,800 Hz. These are all multiples of 1,200 Hz and several other researchers, used 42,800 Hz in their systems, Meyers among them. Though I never did get to see his electrolyzer box, I came away understanding that Bob was "the man" and that he was more than willing to share all that he knew with everyone. That he was an altruist, like myself, bent on saving his planet just as I was.

When I returned to New York, I began to write articles about my experience with Bob and details of his system and the specifications for an exact replication of that system. I reported back to the Watercar and Hydroxy egroups all that Bob had shared with me. (Though Hydroxy was Bob's egroup, he kept a low profile out of his genuine humility, not willing to blow his own horn. Though he always offered his knowledge freely, we weren't all aware of the authority of experience he had available. I guess we all just

assumed he was one of the novices all the rest of us were.) Everyone else in these groups immediately recognized Bob's place as Guru and teacher, a situation that had not happened before due to Bob's genuine humility and lack of self promotion within the groups. Patrick Kelly, an egroup friend from many forums who had meticulously

document almost every technology that I had faith in, documented the Bob Boyce System thoroughly and began to update every little piece of info that leaked out of Bob, to fill in the tiniest holes in our knowledge of his system.

The complete story of how Bob made his discoveries of Hydroxy is detailed in my article for PESN but here is a brief synopsis. Bob was racing speed boats, the little ones with the "rooster tails", he wanted to go faster, so he began to use Hydrogen to power his boats as it had more energy than gas. It was hard to get in remote places like those where many boat races are held and on weekends and holidays, so Bob toyed with the idea of making his own. He built electrolyzers to provide the Hydrogen and would drain the batteries in the boat making hydrogen on demand for each run and then replace the batteries with fresh ones for the next run. Eventually, he hooked the alternator up to the cell to recharge the batteries and drive the electrolysis.

Then he began to notice that at a certain frequency of rpm his motor would take off and power would surge. It was undeniable. So, he took his alternator off and took it apart. He found out that a short had developed in the alternator that gave him a certain frequency pulse to the electrolyzer at that rpm. He had the magic frequencies. He did other things like having the gas analyzed and the crud that came off the plates, etc. He

studied this phenomena very scientifically. That study led to his becoming arguably the most knowledgeable man in these matters since Stanley Meyers was poisoned.

Once everyone knew that Bob was the man with the answers things really took off in the Watercar, Hydroxy and Workingwatercar egroups. We became a team, Workingwatercar egroup was set up for exact replications of the full Bob Boyce system. Hydroxy and watercar egroups continued to explore other territory as well, including boosters.

I can't say for sure that I was the first to mention it but I went to Home Depot and located some Stainless Steel switch plate covers and tested them out as plates for an electrolyzer. They worked pretty well and I reported that to the group. Later, Eletrik1 would report his development of the "Step gap design" which optimized what we call the open bath type cell, getting 1.7 liter/minute output on 12V at 20-30 amps or so, or 240watts of input. Others reported getting a small gasoline engine to run on about 3 l/m of Hydroxy.

Today there are nearly a dozen different configurations that are producing acceptable output in the groups.

1. The Smack Booster - 1.7 l/m when properly constructed and conditioned 2. Smack Boosters with Pulsing of various kinds 3. 7 cell Boyce sealed cells in "brute force mode" 12V DC continuous 4. 7 Cell Boyce sealed cells pulse modulated 5. 49 Cell Boyce type (Houston's) brute force mode

6. 49 Cell Boyce type (Houston's) pulse modulated 7. 60 and 100 cell Boyce Type Cells Brute Force 8. 60 and 100 Cell Boyce Type Cells modulated 9. Meyers type SS Tube Cells Brute Force 10.Meyers Type SS Tube Cells Modulated 11.My own Chinese Meat Chopper Cell

(Dozen's of new Hydogen and Hydroxy Generator Cells are coming on the commercial market each month now it seems. Some are efficient, some aren't, some are economical, some are way too expensive, and efficiency, safety and price are not necessarily related. Grin!)

It is hard to say who is or isn't running their car on 100% Hydroxy, as yet, no one has reported doing so, to any of our groups. But that is believed to be due to the caution against MIB embarrassments. Bob has four Prius that he is currently in the process of converting to run on 100% Hydroxy as I type this page. Hopefully I'll be adding a last minute update here before we go to print with this book.

However, a handful of people have posted videos of small gasoline engines running 100% on Hydroxy as of this writing. It is only a matter or making more Hydroxy to get a four, six or eight cylinder running 100% on Hydroxy, except for the various auto computer control systems in newer cars which seemed to have been specifically designed to thwart the efforts to replace gasoline with Hydroxy. This doesn't surprise many of us

who firmly believe in the oil/auto conspiracy to sell us lots of gasoline by making inefficient cars.

That is OK though, we will just make efficient Hydroxy generators and go directly to Electric Hybrids with Hydroxy powered Electric Generators on board them for maximum range and recharging on the fly. There is more than one way to skin an enslaving monopolist energy tyrant. Or we will all run out and buy a pre-ECU auto with old fashioned distributer and carburator. I see a big boom in old and classic auto sales coming really soon.

(Fig. 18. Hydroxy System drawing)

There is so much to write about this technology that this entire book could be filled with Hydroxy information alone. You would be wise to investigate Hydroxy intently through the egroups on Yahoo and Youtube videos. Bob has reported that Diesel Engines can be run 80% Hydroxy. Imagine what this could mean toward meeting clean air targets. Now, back to the earlier Joe Cell story.

Apparently the claim was that the water in the Joe Cell, after tedious conditioning, became a collector of the mysterious Zero Point Energy, which evidently was able to use the very air we breath as the gas to expand and push the pistons down, making the auto engine run. This last claim seemed ridiculous to all of us. That is, until, Bill Williams, a member of the Egas group, reported that he had built and installed one on his Ford 350

V8 truck. Bill's report was that he was afraid to drive his truck with the cell in it. He was having to hold the brake as he drove, because if he touched the pedal he was doing 80, if he didn't touch the pedal, he was doing 30. He was afraid he was going to run over someone from behind. (An Auto Engineer has recently posted to the Hydroxy group that the working fluid in an auto engine is the Nitrogen in the air and that basically the gas is just used to heat the Nitrogen so that it expands to drive the piston down.)

(Fig. 19. Joe Cell Drawing)

The video that Bill Williams posted of his truck running on the Joe Cell with timing -70 After Top Dead Center, is on Youtube. Enter Bill Williams Joe Cell in the search Youtube window to see it. Shortly after Bill reported these things in the Egas egroup, he came back to report that he was quiting his Joe Cell research and destroying his stuff, because of his families health. All of us thought that was suspicious. Then a friend of Bill's reported to the group that Bill had been accosted on the road and his family threatened by the MIB, men in black.

I got really pissed off about that, so I posted that we should all stop whatever we were doing and build a Joe Cell, each and every one of us. I think there were about 5,000 people on that group at the time and it would be a really great response to their threats to Bill's family if 5,000 people start doing what they threatened them, to stop. Because of Bill's report, we began to take the Joe Cell seriously and look deeper to try and figure out how it could be working.

I joined the JoeCellDevice and Joe Cell egroups and threw myself totally into it. I was now only participating in the Egas, JoeCell and JoeCellDevice egroups as they took up all my on line time. We pursued Hydroxy systems and Joe Cell Systems with equal vigor. Close associates of the mythical Joe X were frequent posters in the Joe Cell groups. One of them name Alex Schiffer, put together a complete guide to the Joe Cell for newbies. I just googled "Alex Joe Cell Guide". It popped right up on the first page, do it. Watch the 3 stages video too.

The Joe Cell is composed of 3 to 7 concentric, non-magnetic stainless steel cylinders. The outermost cylinder is also the container for the water. The Joe Cell is all about the water. The quality of the water is the single most important factor. The better water you start with, the sooner you will be running your car on Joe Cell Energy. The best water to start with is from a stream, spring or rainwater but it depends on each source and how good that source is. Factors may be the mineral content or pollution in it.

While the water is being conditioned it "emits" the crud that is in the water. This is an eye opening experience. You would never believe the crap that is in clear water. Some of the crap that comes into the water may actually be coming from the Stainless Steel too. In Hydroxy cell conditioning similar crud is found to come from the iron or carbon content of the steel but that can't be the only source as distilled water produces much less crude than tap water, or even spring water.

If this is hard to comprehend,.you might want to see the movie, "Messages From Water". There is much to be known about this amazing element as you will learn from that movie. Did you know that there are at least 17 different states of water? The study of water is, or will become a science unto itself, as it rightly should. The study of Water as Fuel has become one already though several of the most promising ways to use it are not yet being investigated by our universities and thus are left to the garage researchers that are doing amazing things.

As of this moment, there are three must see videos on the use of water to run Standard Internal Combustion Engines. Enter 14 LPM Hydroxy Generator in the Youtube search window to see one; S1r9a9m9 Video 2 to see the other; and Hydrogen Scooter Test to see a third series of videos.

Chapter 11 S1r9a9m9 Water Spark System

If you saw the three videos recommended in the last sentence of the previous chapter you are already primed to learn about the next system, the S1r9a9m9 system. The Yahoo egroup for this system is Waterfuel1978. Strange things happen when searching for this group so be persistent, don't accept failure until you find it. At various times, I have entered the name into the group search window on Yahoo and only the ANTI-S1r9a9m9 egroup would be offered in results. Something is very fishy there.

Anyway, one day while working in Egas egroup, a man posted a claim to have 30,000 miles on a 1978 El Camino running on water injected directly into the pistons, and NO Petrol, or Hydroxy, or Hydrogen Gas whatsoever! Needless to say we all grilled this guy every way possible and most people laughed it off. Something about his story rang true to me, or I was just smart enough to figure it would be a big mistake to dismiss the device without a thorough investigation. So, I kept up with it. And when S1r, as I referred to him for shorter typing, started a group dedicated to his system. I joined enthusiastically.

In the beginning there was a full disclosure of the system with one exception. S1r9a9m9, himself, had no idea what the big Relay/Vibrators he had used in the car were, nor where to find more. Nor did he really understand what they were doing well enough to explain

it to us. Since the lack of that device prevented anyone else from a serious replication of his work; S1r caught all kinds of crap from everyone that came into the forum and on other forums where it was discussed.

This is where I get to pat myself on the back again. My experience with the Joe Cell and its mysterious operation, especially something called the Suzuki story, taught me better than to dismiss this. And S1r just didn't sound like a liar to me. Also, somewhere I had come across an article about Electro-hydraulic Sheet Metal Forming and another on Superheated Steam. Both of these technologies seemed like plausible explanations for the cars operation. Then there was the possibility that more than one of these phenomena might be occurring in concert to make it run.

One reason for my faith in the S1r9a9m9 system was an experience I have had in my apartment on a couple of occasions. More than once I have plugged in an extension cord and experienced a small but violent explosion that darkened the end you plug things into. I reasoned that there had been some moisture or oil on my hand when I touched that part prior to plugging it in. Still I thought it very strange, because the blast was scary and the moisture or oil was tiny, invisible to the eye.

The Suzuki story was told by, the world famous now, Joe X. He said that long ago, some Japanese auto makers were having difficulty getting one or more aluminum engines to shut off, even after they had been denied all fuel. The Electro-hydraulic Sheet Metal Forming article I found detailed how manufacturers in Auto and Aircraft Industries used

a phenomena where 20 KJ of electricity was fired across electrodes in a vat of water sealed by the blank sheet to be formed into a part. The force resulting formed superior auto and aircraft parts with less stress and more precision.

The Superheated Steam theory I can't quite remember at the moment but I was blessed to find a detailed article by an expert on that, which seemed a feasible mechanism for driving the engine in the water car. The reader should google that topic and read up on it for his own edification to determine whether it could be a contributor to the operation. When one considered that there is no reason all of these forces couldn't be combining in the engine to make it work, including instanct Hydroxy formation, and that any one of them could be strong enough to do so; I was determined to hang in there to the conclusion of this investigation.

Near the beginning of the group a member named Remoi posted a claim of having replicated the experiment with the exception that he could not accelerate but only idle the car on water. I wrote a post to Remoi, exclaiming that he had done it then; because the only thing left to do after this was increase the jets in the carburetor by 2 sizes according to S1rs original story. For a long time I didn't hear any more from Remoi, though we posted questions to him occasionally.

A couple years went by and very little advancement was being made in the Waterfuel1978 forum beyond discussions. S1r was always talking about trying to find a replacement for the ancient Relay/Vibrators, and everyone else, but me, was giving him

hell for delaying and withholding info. Then just, oh, maybe, six months ago things started happening. Capacitor 70 made a replication attempt on a motorcycle/scooter with one of the water spark circuits Tero had come up with, as a possible alternative in luie of the unobtainium Relays..

Other people were starting to get small gas engines to run on Hydroxy about then too. guess this put some extra pressure on S1r to get something working, anyway, he posted

the historic S1r9a9m9 Video 1, 2, and 3 sometime in June or July and this field has really taken off from there. S1r9a9m9 has reported that 200 people are working on replications and that he is about to release a report detailing the best replicable system. Also, he claimed to have another car with a new system with easily obtainable parts that he was going to bring to an Oct. 2008 fest in Florida. However, he later reported that because he had routed the exhaust directly back into the engine rather than back to the water tank as in the original El Camino (a missing piece of the replications to date), it blew up due to the power of the extra Nitrogen or Nitrous Oxide in the exhaust.

As usual, the skeptics are having a field day with this, but most of us are giving S1r the benefit of the doubt and waiting for the rebuild of that engine. My guess is all the mechanics in the bunch have had such failures in untimely similar situations. So, this is a very exciting time in the WaterCar movement. We just might be saving the planet sooner than later in spite of the POWERS THAT BE.

(Insert Fig. 20. S1r9a9m9 drawing)

Chapter 12 The Tesla Switch

The bad thing about being disorganized is that you sometimes duplicate things unnecessarily. I'm not sure I've covered the Tesla Switch sufficiently yet, so, if I'm repeating myself, good. It will reinforce the importance of this device.

Basically a Tesla Switch just bounces power back and forth between sets of batteries through the load, some working device that uses energy. Only, the energy isn't really used up. It just does the work on its way from one battery to another. This is a simple scheme but a little complex to implement. What is done is this...

Through some automated means,, preferably semiconductors as relays will wear out eventually, three or four (or more) batteries (lead acid or gel cells, so far) are connected such that there is always a receiving battery on the other side of the load. For instance, you could connect two 12V car batteries in series for 24V, run that across a capacitor into a full wave bridge rectifier (four diodes configured such that polarity of connection is irrelivant. Your batteries and load will always be getting the right polarity no matter which batteries of what polarity are connected.), through the load, then to a single 12 V battery whose ground is connected back to the 24V Pair in a specific way. There will be 24V on one side of the load (work device such as motor) and 12V on the other. So, 12V

of power will flow through the work device and into the single 12V battery.

This just happens for a pulse, then the switches in your system switch the battery connections such that the receiving battery is now in series with one of the other batteries to form the 24V and one of those now becomes the single 12V battery being charged. There are numerous ways to assemble batteries and switches to use this simple process. It is somewhat a brain teaser to wire though, unless you are used to that sort of thing. These systems have indicated that though a lot of work gets done in the load; most of the charge is recovered by the single 12V battery (or whatever your lower voltage configuration might be) and available for reuse.

(Fig. 21. Tesla Switch Drawing)

I suspect that the whole system will run down though eventually unless you stick some spark gap, coil or capacitor in there to draw some additional energy from the Zero Point. Maybe the capacitors that isolate the load are big enough to do that. That would be a good question for one of the Tesla Switch Experts in the field, Bedini, Bearden, Naudin, Hartman, Konzen, Hector, etc.

The spark gap phenomena may be a big part of this device as it is in some Bedini Motors, the Avremenko Spark, Arnold Motor, and many other devices. The Michael Couch Theory of spark gap phenomena is that after a spark gap is breached the extra electrons that were used to breach the gap (High Voltage) are absorbed in the circuit requiring

them to be refilled in the Nitrogen or Air Molecules from the Zero Point, other Air Molucules, Earth Ground, or Zero Point Energy.

I have only highlighted the major systems that I am excited about at the moment. There are many that I have forgotten that are equally as credible and in which I have just as much faith; Chris Arnold's motor, The Steven Marks device (Steven has gone silent or missing), the Flynn Device, the SMOT, the Perendev Magnet Motor, the OCPMM or OCAL, Charles Campbell's Gravity Wheel Motor, the Papps Engine, Cold Fusion, and more. The Free Energy Field is where the Internet was in 1989.

Two of my favorite resources for finding good Free Energy Devices RexResearch.com and Theverylastpageoftheinternet.com are no more, I understand, that is sad. If you can locate them in the Web Archive and download a copy you should. I wish I had already done that or had the time to do it now.

I was just about to tell you to google Cold Fusion Dr. Bussard? Anyway, there once was a video (recently, found it again) on Google of a pitch made to Google Company for funding of Cold Fusion using a proprietary magnetic containment in a table top fusor based on Farnsworth's Fusor work (Philo T. Farnsworth the inventor of Television). That video seems to have disappeared (no surprise there), suppressed I suspect. Usually Google would correct the search when you get this close to it. It may not be destroyed, only missplaced. You would think that the leading search engine could find a video about a presentation given at its offices on an Earth shakingly important subject like clean

free energy.

Anyway, it was a great pitch and very informative. Apparently, Dr. Bussard (Inventor of the RamJet, former head of the Nuclear Industry Commission) has improved on the Farnsworth fusor by using small magnetic containment fields similar to larger standard ones used in this field to trap the particles. All they lack is the $200 Million to scale up their tabletop model for a practical power plant demonstration. I pray for this mans life and hope you will too. There is a multi-billion dollar industry trying to ride the current energy crisis back onto the scene called traditional nuclear fission and several even bigger industries that will take big losses in revenue. Hopefully this book will help spread the word about his device. If so, maybe they wont kill him to keep it quiet.

Public domain is the only way to beat these bastards. If you develop something that works, give it into the public domain immediately before they kill you to suppress it. Then it will spread like wildfire before they can stop it and there will be no use killing you because YOUR Free Energy Cat, too, has already escaped the Bag.

(Insert Fig. 22 Description of Bussard's device and name of it)

Chapter 13 Reluctance Generators

About the time that Butch LaFonte was sharing his video of the magnets and rulers demonstration, I came across the Reluctance Generator of Al Francoeur. Immediately, I saw that this was a technology with great potential. It just makes good sense to me. Instead of spinning heavy magnets or coils, why not spin a light piece of metal that can block the magnetic fields.

Basically this rotating device works in much the same way that the Motionless Electronic Generator would. Al Francoeur was the only person I know of to replicate the David Grey motor, which is simply a kind of metal and magnet rocky-horse.

A delicate balance is set up between parts such that a magnet attracts a metal lever bar. But as the metal lever end approaches closer and closer to the magnet this motion of the device causes a magnet shield to come between the attracting magnet and bar; breaking the magnetic flux field that attracts the two. This causes the lever to fall back into its original position and starts the cycle again.

It is easy to see how this David Grey motor would lead to the Reluctance Generator. Al reasoned, why not use this same principle in a rotating generator. So, Al built a very

professional device to do just that. In the Reluctance Generator magnets are set up opposite coils bathing them in the flux fields of the magnet. As a small force (motor, waterwheel, bicycler, hamster cage, oxen pulled device, whatever) spins a wheel with alternating gaps and flux field deflectors, the flux is alternately allowed to flood the coils or blocked away from them creating electricity via the flux field line movements across the coils.

I haven't heard from Al on the current state of his generator in a long time but he was experiencing heating in the magnetic shields because he had been using a metal that actually was attracted to the magnets. The last I heard he was going to experiment with MuMetals for his shield parts. Another option might be a configuration of magnets that result in a monopole magnet. Apparently when you attach a group of magnets in a certain configuration (Halbech) you can get the field lines to engage each other such that only one side of the composite object is magnetic.

Ultimately the idea is to use a small force to control a much larger force just as in the MEG. I gave Al a chapter of his own because I feel that this approach has as much merit as any of the others for being scaled up to fully replace fossil fuel use. There are more devices in this category though the only name of one I can think of at the moment is the Ecklin device.

The Ecklin generator uses a spinning magnetic lamination embedded in nonmagnetically conductive material such that magnet conduction and interruption takes

place alternately. One could argue that this is exactly the same thing as the Reluctance generator but it seems a slight bit different. In this device we are actually conducting the magnetic flux field through the rotor instead of just blocking the field lines.

The end result is very similar though. Magnetic conduction is the equivalent to power on, magnetic disruption to power off. We are just switching the magnetic force on and off, like the device I imagined as a result of the Cash Register problems years ago. There are variations of this device as well, one is configured to conduct across different coils via the curved lamination paths through the rotor, one magnetically joins both ends of a coil lamination, while another just makes and breaks each coils path straight across the rotor. I'm sure there is lots of room for experimenting with this design.

(Fig 23. Ecklin Type Generator drawing)

Chapter 14 Farnsworth Fusor and Bussard

Philo T. Farnsworth, isn't just a pretty name. OK, it isn't even a pretty name, but it is one that should be much more famous than it is. Philo invented Television. Yes, that's right. No, it wasn't General Zarkoff (however you spell that), of General Electric. Zarkoff's device used mechanical spinning discs and eventually died out. Though the General originally was granted the patent, Farnsworth won the court battle just before his patent rights expired.

This is an amazing story that every inventor should read, Romance and Distant Vision by Mrs. Pem Farnsworth, Philo's wife. Ultimately, though Billions of dollars were made and continue to be made from the invention of television. It wasn't the inventor, Philo T., who made them. In the end, all Mr. Farnsworth made from his invention was a reputation and the borrowed money he lived on all those years while he was perfecting it. He did gain some satisfaction by living to see live video feed from the moon via his invention.

But the Farnsworth Fusor is the topic of this chapter. Philo worked on this device in the

basement of Brigham Young University. My guess is the same basement where cold fusion was discovered. They have a lot in common.

I would have to go back and read up on this technology to explain it here so I'll just gloss over it to get to the next subject. Basically, Farnsworth created an electrical cage in a vacuum chamber and released hydrogen into the cage. He used High Voltage to slam these hydrogen ions into each other at high speed to create helium. I hope I'm getting this right.

Anyway, just google Farnsworth Fusor and read it for yourself. Apparently though, it wasn't quite scalable. This is where Bussard comes in. The added Boussard magic was the use of special shaped magnetic containment fields that recycled the ions to increase their speed and number. These devices aren't trivial to build though they are small. A new friend is attempting to replicate the Bussard device and estimates a cost of $5,000.

The important thing to remember here is that both of these devices release huge quantities of energy and do NOT generate radio active waste. Maybe you should ask your Congressman why he isn't pushing this technology, RIGHT NOW! And ask Google/Youtube why you can't find the video.

Chapter 15 3M Force Field Wall

This chapter isn't dedicated to a device but to a phenomena. Why?, you might ask. Because I have this gut feeling that this phenomena might have an amazing device hidden in the facts. Like most of the things I've really been excited about in this field of Free Energy; my excitement has an experiential basis.

I was working for peanuts in a plastics fabrication plant in Knoxville, TN before I got my Electronics Certification, before the advent of the personal computer. One of the machines in the plant was called a splitter. This device was used to split wide large rolls of plastic into narrower large rolls of plastic. Usually there was a large roll of polypropylene plastic left on the spool of the machine which saw rare use.

During my first day tour of the plant my supervisor made a point of warning me about walking close to the roll on this machine. It will give you a nasty shock, especially on a cold day. I seem to remember something about someone going to the hospital over it. I also seem to remember asking if this was only while the machine was in operation or anytime. And that the answer to this question was that it was not dependent on the machine running. Apparently the plastic roll was building a charge just sitting there..

I'm sorry that I can't be more certain of these memories but the reason I pass on this story is that like Einstein said, I never bother remembering anything I know where to look up. In other words the fact that I filed this info away in my brain is pretty indicative of its importance to me and I can't imagine my doing so if the phenomena was just the equivalent of sliding across a car seat and touching the door handle. If I had to bet my life one way or the other, I'd bet on the way I'm relating it here.

While rummaging around the Internet as my custom was to do, I came upon a description of this 3M Force Field story. It was a published report of a worker's experience while working at a 3M plant (vague memory of it being in Boulder, Colorado, or near there. Found it again, it was in North Carolina actually.) The story goes that a worker was trying to walk under a wide, fast moving roll of plastic film in the factory and ran into an invisible impenetrable force field. He shared his experience and had it verified by others

Apparently the field was only there when the roll was moving. Something was 20', I can't remember if it was the gap he tried to walk through, the width of the film roll, or the size of the invisible force wall (The film path was 20' up, over, down and across, verified). Anyway, keeping in mind the previous comments about not remembering things unless I'm sure they are important; this I remembered as important. I have yet to wrap my mind around just how this could be the mother of an important Free Energy Invention but it is right there knocking on my brain. Or at least, my mind is still clinging

to the foggy facts about it as though it is significant.

Before I take a few stabs at what it might be, a few words about why I cling to things like this. History,... I have a history of knowing things other people don't know until a long time later. You might call it premonition but it isn't based on anything so ephemeral, it is more like an auto-mechanic knowing what's wrong with your engine by the way it sounds when you pull in to his shop.

A Whimhurst machine (google it) works by extracting free electrons from the air as the electrostatic materials rub through it. Basically turning air friction into electricity, like your socks rip electrons off the carpet when you walk on it in the Winter. I'm suspecting that the energy transfer has less to do with the energy input into the device than it does with the natural energy (free electron) deficit in one material and the energy (free electron) excess naturally existing in the other.

There is also a device called an Influence Generator and several others that accumulates charge and is able to build it on sequential passes. These devices have been around for over a century. (There is an excellent one page catalogue of these devices somewhere on the internet, I'll look for it again.) Another clue is the lowly galvanometer. When a charge is applied the leafs separate and the work done separating them continues until it slowly bleeds off, unless you discharge it directly, reminding one of the magnet holding the steel in the air. The temptation to build a device using electrostatics is similar to that of doing so with permanent magnets. Well, so much for trying to lay a little background

for what might seem like an extremely unscientific evaluation.

(Heh, heh, heh, this is where the electrostatic motor stuff I remembered today as I was reading this book again goes. There are several versions of this simple, easy to build electrostatic motor; one is called the Pop Bottle Motor and another is made from styrofoam coffee cups. Google this for lots of fun, especially with kids. You can build up the static charge to run these motors by rubbing a plastic with fur and by transfering it with paddles covered with aluminum foil, very cool demostrations of the principles involved. I'll try and stick photos here.)

It is a well known fact that the High Voltage potential of the atmosphere increases with elevation, some have tapped this natural energy source with wires. There is as much as 1200 Volts within easy reach. Lightening may come from air and water friction but I wonder if part of it could come from the magnetosphere, and the Earth's motion through it, as well. My point is that though electrostatics have been known for dozens of decades, can we really expect that its usefulness has been sufficiently explored.

I really need to email Bill Beaty about this and what was that other thing? Oh, well, it will come to me. Most people are not aware that there are Electrostatic Thin Film Motors that are more efficient per weight and power than the common, normal, bruteforce ones, we rely on every day. What does it mean that a spool of polypropylene can develop an high voltage charge just by sitting there? What does it mean that a large piece of plastic film moving quickly can generate an impenetrable force field?

This is the way my mind works. What if we spin a roll of polypropylene? Would we have a generator? Remember we are only trying to overcome friction and gravity, otherwise this thing wants to keep moving, flywheel like. The more the roll weighs the more flywheel effect we get. What if the accumulation of electrons is not directly proportional to the energy required to rotate the roll? Why would it be? What difference would it make if the roll was not a roll but a wide plastic cylinder? Why would that make a difference. What exactly was charging up that roll of polypropylene as it sat there? Ambient air currents in the room transfering free electrons to it?

Remember the amount of the flux field movement across the coil in our Motionless Electrical Generator is proportional to the speed of collapse and that is independent of the power input. What if there is a similar disconnect in electrostatic generation with plastics and air friction? I mean, what if the energy collected had more to do with the number of air molecules in contact with the number of plastic molecules? Sure this increases with speed and that is related to power input, but what if there was a speed at which power from the numbers of plastic and air molecular interactions were far in excess of the power required to turn the roll? We already know that this interaction has more to do with the properties of the materials you use. Wool and amber, rubber and fur or did I have it backwards? What are the parameters and variables in these relationships? If you rub one material against the wrong material it doesn't produce the optimum electron transfer and accumulation.

So, it seems that proper material characteristics have more to do with how much power you get from an electrostatic generator than power input and speed. Also, in our sock/carpet example, have you ever noticed that there seems to be an optimal speed beyond which faster rubbing doesn't increase the charge you can build. My guess is that the friction raises the temperature and makes the process less efficient in transferring electrons.

So there would be an optimum speed at which the maximum electrons were transferred between sock and carpet depending on the room temperature and maybe even the temperature outside. Remember, when you are building painfully powerful electrostatic charges with socks or seats, the room and car are often comfortably warm, maybe even warmer than they are in spring or summer. So the exterior Earth/Air temperature may have more to do with the phenomena than the temperature in the house or car.

Also, one amazing thing about the Force Wall was that it didn't fry anyone or damage them. What kind of force can feel solid in air enough to be impenetrable yet not have enough amps or voltage to hurt you through electric charge? The Zero Point Energy has many counterintuitive properties, could the Wall have been a manifestation of Zero Point Energy, extracted in some way we don't understand? The magic angle 90 degrees may be a clue here. Stirling Engines have to be 90 degrees apart, force vectors of electricity are 90 degree relationships, and on and on.

Tesla used High Voltage Generators to explore the Radiant Energy phenomena

described in his writings. Radiant energy is different from normal High Voltage. I won't reproduce Tesla's writings on the subject here but if you haven't read them you should. I'll try to find the link and post it here.

The energy he felt was a prickly painful but bearable stinging sensation that could pass through glass. Now, that doesn't compare well with the Wall except that it is weird and might be an attribute that is related like all the attributes of matter are linked in pairs such that you can only be certain of one of them at a time. Or maybe there are several different kinds of radiant energy just as Low Voltage and High Voltage are variations of the same thing but have different properties and behave differently in the same circumstances depending on how high or low the voltage is.

What if the painful prickly phenomena and the force wall phenomena are like the characteristics of voltage and amperage at high voltage and low voltage. Joe X is always talking about the frequency of the energy in the video where he explains the Suzuki phenomena. He also says that energy is flowing BOTH ways in the DC wires in the Suzuki video. John Keeley and Walter Russel both key on frequency as the be all, end all of the matter/energy spectrum and I agree. All there really is, is frequency, a vibration in Nothing. That is what matter is and that is what energy is. The Michael Couch Theory of the Universe says the difference between matter and energy is their vectors, energy is linear or direction waves, and matter is orbital. Keeley claimed to have watched Monks in China (or was it India) levitate huge stones through the air up to inaccessible places using musical instruments and the frequencies they played. NASA

experimented with and uses acoustic (frequency) levitation (Official NASA Paper somewhere on the Internet).

If in the Wall, we are dealing with Radiant Energy, Zero Point Energy, Orgone or whatever you want to call it; frequency could be the key. And it could be any of the frequencies involved; the frequency of the up/down vibration of the film as it rolled across the gap, the frequency of the air/film interface interaction, the frequency of the static voltage created by the air/film friction, harmonics of any of the above or their interference.

Perhaps this all sounds like useless rambling, it may be. But it is also a useful creative method called free association, though constrained to things that may be in fact related in ways we can't yet connect. The underlying theme between all these things is weirdness, just the kind of weirdness Radiant/Zero Point/Free/Orgone/Scalar Wave (Whatever) Energy is known to exhibit. I guess that is why my mind wants to collect all these different weirdnesses and try to connect them somehow.

If they are all just different manifestations of the same force, that would simplify things by reducing the number of weird things we are dealing with from four or five to one. And this one may give us entirely new, easier, cheaper ways to tap the Zero Point Energy that has so many different names.

My prophecy is that someday soon, someone I don't know, someone I've talked to about

it, or myself; will come up with a way to turn the 3M Force Wall; Polypropylene Roll self charging capacitor, sock/carpet; Radiant Energy phenomena into another form of inexpensive, practical Free Energy Device.

I hope this discussion has inspired you to support Free Energy Research. You can do that in numerous ways; get out in your garage and build something, watch all the Youtube videos, join a Yahoo Free Energy/Water Car Egroup, tell others about the conspiracy to keep Free Energy from the people, demand that your Congressman support Free Energy Research in an Open Source fashion, donate to a Free Energy Researcher or Foundation like Panacea.org or JLNLabs.org, start a Hedge Fund that invests in these guys and their research/products, buy an Hydroxy Generator for your car and start saving gas.

Epilogue The Carbon Fiber Future

Much as I would love to see the Oil/Energy/Auto/Banking Criminal Corporations put out of business entirely; it appears to be in all our bests interests for me to pass on a great way for them to survive and thrive in the coming fossil fuelless future. Even as all these great Free Energy Technologies come on line in the very near future, thank God; we need Carbon Fiber, as much of it as we can make, and we will need it from now on. Why? Because it is the best material for building almost everything; buildings, cars, boats, planes, furniture, whatever, especially things that use energy on a per weight basis or cover large areas and need to be strong.

So, the magic bullet that saves our butts and planet from Carbon Fuel poison may well be the same greedy motive that is killing us now. Carbon is too precious as Carbon Fiber to be used as Carbon Fuel, except and unless, you are capturing that carbon for use as carbon fiber (apparently all carbon waste, like soot, results in some percentage of carbon nanotube production as well). Since one may well have to burn carbon based compounds in order to create carbon fiber, we might as well use the heat it generates for energy and power, etc. as we are now. However, clean coal technologies and pollution free carbon fuel technologies of the future will more than pay for their own expensive clean up technology development and equipment, with the value of the carbon fiber material they capture that would otherwise be pollution.

What I am saying is this... if someone engineers a device that captures all the carbon waste from running a gasoline engine, turning it into a bag of carbon fiber you can sell at the carbon fiber cloth/rod/sheet/infusion product plant for more money than the gasoline cost you in the first place; are you going to just dump that carbon into the air? I didn't think so. The Branson/Gore $25 million dollar prize for an invention that will reduce carbon emmissions bla bla bla; the X-Prize for Global Warming Solutions, etc. are nothing compared to the value of using such technology once it is invented. It can't be that hard, trees do it all the time.

My guess is that the technology is already there in the coal power plant scrubbers, catalytic converters, trees, chemistry knowledge, or the carbon fiber and carbon nanotube production technologies already in use. The thing that has been lacking is the vision to see the oportunity to profit from the waste product itself, the carbon, for carbon fiber materials production. We don't even have to place a return deposit on it, just tell people what it is worth as a raw material for building lighter cars, trucks, airplanes, bikes, products; and stronger or cheaper buildings (cheaper once we all start collecting the stuff for use). I'm ready for the education that readers who know about these things will certainly offer me free of charge after reading this page. So, email me with my first lesson at cmichaelcouch@yahoo.com. Maybe we can start an Open Source Science/Development effort on this idea.

Back Page) Everything Never Stops Is a personal journey, guide-by-historical-story, introduction to the fascinating world of alternative Open Source Free Energy Science, the stuff the PTB (Powers that Be) use the MIB (Men in Black) to supress. No, it isn't a thrilling suspense novel. It is a true story about an incredible cyber journey that may have had significant part in helping to save our planet and our very own lives. And the impact of this journey hasn't even begun to be felt yet. Reading this book may very well allow you to become an early partaker of the enormous benefits to mankind and our life styles that may well have been significantly hastened by the journey revieled in these pages. Come to think of it, the mass reading of this story may well have more impact than the actual events in the story. The spreading of the knowledge between these pages will change the world rapidly. This knowledge is spreading at an amazing pace already. This book will probably speed that up exponentially. We all win.