Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
August 2010
0
This presentation contains certain forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements are based on certain assumptions, discuss future expectations, describe future plans and strategies, contain financial and operating projections or state other forwardlooking information. The Companys ability to predict results or the actual effect of future events, actions, plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, the Companys actual results and performance could differ materially from those set forth in, or implied by, the forward-looking statements. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any of these forward-looking statements, which reflect the Companys views on this date. Furthermore, except as required by law, the Company is under no duty to, and does not intend to, update any of our forward-looking statements after this date, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. This presentation does not constitute, and may not be used in connection with, an offer or solicitation by anyone in any jurisdiction in which such offer or solicitation is not permitted by law or in which the person making the offer or solicitation is not qualified to do so or to any person to whom it is unlawful to make such offer or solicitation.
Investment Highlights
The Grove at Greeley, CO
Echo Boom drives enrollment growth Increasing percentage of high-school graduates attending college Increasing foreign enrollments
(millions)
Demand Drivers
Supply Factors
Existing on-campus housing stock becoming increasingly obsolete Lack of construction financing is restricting new entrants
Source: Dept. of Education, National Center for Educational Statistics
Enrollment expected to increase by ~1.5 million students over the next 8 years
Amenity rich bed/bath parity, resort-style activities Close proximity to campus Barriers to entry Lower cap-ex requirements
27 5,048 / 13,580
Markets have strong enrollment growth 9.5% average growth (3) Less institutional competition & comparable product
3.0 years
Includes 6 joint venture properties in which Campus Crest owns a 49.9% member interest As of 6/30/2011
Our markets benefit from higher enrollment growth than primary markets
On-campus atmosphere with advantages of off-campus economics Benefits from symbiotic relationships with universities Greater impact from marketing dollars
Well-established university markets with protective community councils Superior land acquisition and entitlement capabilities Lack of available financing for local operators
We are able to build a superior product at a lower cost because of our captive general contractor and wholesale purchaser
Traditional on-campus, dormitory-style housing alternatives have generally consisted of shared rooms, communal bathroom facilities and extremely limited (if any) amenities and parking
6
Purpose-built student housing is specifically designed to appeal to modernday college students with broad on-site amenities, enhanced privacy and a focus on the overall lifestyle experience
7
Private bedrooms with keyed locks En suite bathrooms Full furnishings and full kitchens Modern appliances and washers/dryers State-of-the-art technology Ample parking Gated entrances
On-site Amenities:
Resort-style swimming pools Basketball and volleyball courts Game rooms and coffee bars Fitness centers Community clubhouses
All of our apartment communities offer bed-bath parity, attractively furnished units and a variety of on-site amenities designed to appeal to the college lifestyle
9
At The Grove, we offer a fully-loaded college living experience through our consistent branding and operating philosophy
10
Regular property inspections and audits performed by asset management team using 800 point check list Field-focused executive management team Vertical integration and overlap of construction management and facilities management leads to superior asset performance
The Grove Nation culture drives excitement, customer focus and unmatched residence life experiences
High enrollment growth colleges / universities Limited competing product Proximity to campus
Prototypical roll-out
Reduces costs and shortens development period Proven track record developed ~$500 million of student housing properties
Identified 200+ potential markets & conducting due diligence on 80 sites as potential development opportunities
12
Project Wholly-Owned Developments Ft. Wayne, IN Indiana University / Purdue University Clarksville, TN Austin Peay State University Ames, IA Iowa State University Columbia, MO University of Missouri
Enrollment
Distance to Campus
Units / Beds
Estimated Cost
Joint Venture Developments Denton, TX University of North Texas Valdosta, GA Valdosta State University
36,123 12,391
$24,953 $21,150
We utilize a proprietary underwriting model with over 60 inputs to evaluate the relative attractiveness of each market, which we then use to prioritize development opportunities
13
(1)
(1)
Existing Properties
New Openings
Campus Crest has grown to over 13,500 beds over the last five years by leveraging its platform and brand to deliver a uniform student housing product across multiple markets
14
(1) 2011E includes 4 wholly-owned developments and 2 joint venture developments
88%
87%
83%
87%
89%
$448
$472
$473
$488
$477
CY07
CY08
CY09
CY10
1H11
CY07
CY08
CY09
CY10
1H11
Campus Crest has delivered occupancy and RevPOB growth while significantly expanding its portfolio
(1) (2)
15
Weighted average occupancy applies to properties that are open for the full calendar year Weighted average RevPOB applies to properties that are open for the full calendar year; RevPOB is defined as average total revenue per occupied bed (includes student housing leasing and student housing services revenue)
Portfolio Leasing Status for 2011/2012 Academic Year and Current Year Occupancy
2011-2012 Leases Property Wholly-Owned Joint Venture Properties Sub Total All Operating Properties New Developments (2011 Deliveries) Total Portfolio Units 3,920 1,128 5,048 1,276 6,324 Beds 10,528 3,052 13,580 3,484 17,064 Signed
(1)
16
As of August 1, 2010 and 2011 As of September 30, 2010 As of July 31, 2011
Ample Liquidity
$700
$600 $500
$596.4
Received commitments to expand and convert credit facility (1) from secured to an unsecured facility
$400
$300
$200
$100 At 6/30/2011
32.4%
Debt
Equity
17
Q2 2011 Performance
Same-store NOI
88.4% for the 6-months ended June 30, 2011 compared to 88.3% the same period a year ago
RevPOB of $482 compared to $482 the prior year, with increased rental rates being offset by lower service revenue
Operating portfolio was 87.0% leased versus 81.2% leased at August 1, 2010 Development properties were 70.0% leased at August 1, 2011 FFO per diluted share of $0.17 Adjusted FFO (elimination of change in fair value of interest rate derivatives) per diluted share of $0.16
FFO
25 years of real estate experience developing and operating service-enriched housing properties Founded Campus Crest in 2004
Michael S. Hartnett
Co-Founder, Co-Chairman of the Board & Chief Investment Officer
25 years of real estate experience developing and operating service-enriched housing properties Founded Campus Crest in 2004
Earl C. Howell
President & Chief Operating Officer
Over 33 years of experience in service driven businesses; Colonel in U.S. Army Special Forces Joined Campus Crest as a consultant in 2009
Donnie L. Bobbitt
Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
Over 20 years in corporate accounting and senior financial positions at both private and public companies and Deloitte & Touche LLP
Robert M. Dann
Executive Vice President & President of CCREM & CCD
25-year industry veteran with significant experience in strategic planning, portfolio and asset management and operational execution Joined Campus Crest in 2011
19
Investment Highlights
The Grove at San Angelo, TX
20