Socioeconomic movement of female foeticide I would like to begin my analogy with an abstract of a decent study I found through internet

and then some latest census data of 2011 through its website for our discussion. I request all of my readers and critics to be patient for the points I wish to bring forth in this little discussion till we all understand the context of this paper better and be on same page to throw papers at each other.

Female Foeticide and Infanticide in India: An Analysis of Crimes against Girl Children Sneh Lata Tandon and Renu Sharma University of Delhi, Delhi, India (Sex selective abortions and increase in the number of female infanticide cases have become

a significant social phenomenon in several parts of India. It transcends all castes, class and communities and even the North South dichotomy. The girl children become target of attack even before they are born. Numerous scholars have observed that the latest advances in modern medical sciences the tests like Amniocentesis and Ultra-sonography which were originally designed for detection of congenital abnormalities of the foetus, are being misused for knowing the sex of the foetus with the intention of aborting it if it happens to be that of a female. The worst situation is when these abortions are carried out well beyond the safe period of 12 weeks endangering the womens life.)

Now some latest census data for( 0-6 )Madhya Pradesh:-

Source. Website data for India through census commissioners office Truly the female infanticide is a crime beyond contestation or doubt or discussion but it will bring forth another type of crime in society, and that different facet is something very disturbing and the implications of this social misbalance may have already reached to practical influence level.

Rajan Dubey

Socioeconomic movement of female foeticide We can clearly see a shortfall of women and many people have written slogans on availability of women for marriage of those societies males where this misbalance is sharp. What is it in store that this change in demand and supply will bring forth? Very commonly argued and shown is that may be women will start chasing dowry and the girl children will no longer be a burden. Its a common but a powerful argument of our acceptance that social evils and norms are created by supply and demand side and much less by religion. None the less it makes me comfortable to put some premises of discussions. 1- Can we agree that the last 2 decadal economic growth is disproportionate to simultaneous job growth. We can see bust and boom of MBA business, NIIT clad classes, or such small opportune systems survived merely by call centers culture in suburban towns of metros and now some smaller towns for low cash rich entrepreneurs. 2- Do we agree that when any commodity is costly the burden of cost hits most to its weakest purchaser? 3- The women in community previously pushed to grooms for their more NOs now will reverse the order as suggested by change of dowry theme as suggested by slogans and commonsense acceptance. Meaning the women is now the precious thing and thus would be available to only those who can afford. 4- If the premise NO-3 is true than it has to be true that purchasing quality being same and abstract of study in beginning saying that female foetiside is cut across all sections of society and class :- IMPLICATIONS OF REFERENCE:- the richer class will have to go down to social and economic side of their boundations by caste, class or religion or north and south dichotomy. 5- How does point 4 goes for expansion as some lay man like me could understand better. Means the first beneficiary would be a poor Brahmins girls may/may not be good looking can get married in rich Brahmins house without paying a dime with respect. Same hold true for all the example of Brahmin is just same for all classes and caste. When even above will not be fulfilling the shortfall the caste and class boundations will also be broken. example:- the same poor Brahmin in example who gave her daughter to higher and richer Brahmin will not get a bride in return from another poor or rich Brahmin but instead will attract a lower class rich/or and poor mans daughter. Favor will go certainly go to rich lower class persons daughter for her probability of better acceptance in society. It is another matter of paper to see how
materialistic the Indian society is though we keep saying it is not?

6- When the above chain reaction will finish the left out will be MALE OF LOWEST SOCIEO-ECONOMIC HOUSE. 7- Let us keep in mind conclusion no point of 6th for further bringing the debate.

Rajan Dubey

Socioeconomic movement of female foeticide 8- Do we agree that when we can avoid we choose better. Let me explain further if I dont want a girl child and I can go for female feticide or I am doing this for want of male child anyways I am doing it. That means I am getting only or mostly girl children in society that are wanted by their families. 9- The unwanted girl children are actually not born. Therefore their probability of getting low attention in house (NEGLECTION) or getting uneducated is low. 10So the proportion of girl children performing better in schools will rise till the need of fathers of family is satisfied to bring her to economic wanted level. 11Does this remind us of last 5-10 years headlines in post april results season. LADKIYON NE IS SAAL BHI LADKON SE MAARI BAZI. Isnt it a regular and constant feature we have seen? Almost repeated one. 12Ok.. What is the point? Girl child winning is a sure good sign of society. In the same census it shows the same society that is killing girl child is now making the girl child more educated in absolute NOs as well as percentage. 13What this also brings is that NOW THE UNWANTEDNESS AND NEGLECTECTION PROBABILITY IN A HOUSE IS OF A SON male WHO IS NOT ABORTED BECAUSE SOCIETY DOESNT THINK UNWANTED BOYS SHOULD ALSO BE ABORTED. 14Confused. No ok. Lets us face a hypothetical example. The family that had a child ranking a 3rd or 4th in a family with 1-2 -3 sons and minimum 1 available reached to an abortion shop where they tell that what is inside is a male and not a female. Grandma, pa, ma all in dilemma abortions are ok for girls and not for boys they come back with heavy heart but nonetheless agreed to have one more child. 15Now this or these kind of boys are actually in lowest socio economic criterion will be most probable for having neglecting, school dropout, no job if he is from upper caste, and many more 16Yes social scientists and students can punch many holes through my arguments of movement of commodity of women in social sector. Women literate and may be from lower socio economic will choose a poor same community man. There could be exceptions to all and any. What I have tried to show is a way it could normally take in my view. Girl children born in lowest socio economic circles have worst life than male counterparts and all such valid arguments can be placed for putting social or economic flow to challenge conclusions in here. 17With objections above valid:- and the conclusion of point 6th still true the probability of a male of lowest socioeconomic class having NEGLECTION, NOLOW EDUCATION, NO FAMILY AS PROBABLY NO WIFE DUE TO SCARCITY is very HIGH Doesnt the latest NIN study shows that more males are undernourished than women children.

Rajan Dubey

Socioeconomic movement of female foeticide 18If above is agreed dont count the NO of deduction as below as surplus males in society.

Total
Population size Population size Population size

Unit
Number Number Number

Subgroup 2001 Persons 10782214 Males 5579847 Females 5202367

2011 10548295 5516957 5031338

surplus no's

377480

485619

Madhya Pradesh

The NOs you can see from this latest census data are not extra males. But UNWANTED, LEFT OUT, school dropouts, lowest socio economic group MALES (probably gay) with HIGHEST PROBABILITY OF BECOMING CRIMINALS.
And yes more GAY Sex ready to witness this with harsh laws to protect now precious women from THESE UNWANTED MEN. And the harsher the punishments will be the more the orientation to gay sex will emerge. Anti HIV brigade has work on hand it seems. Even urban mindset politician will demand and get votes for deaths to rapists law slogans. It will always be more logical for this male to have gay sex orientation, to earn from crime for crossing socio economic borders and jobless economic growth and having no female to have a family. This male has more probability to live with parents than anyone else.

NO ITS NOT EXAGERATION----- IF ABOVE ARGUMENTS HOLDS TRUE COUNT YOUR CRIMINALS BEFORE THEY BECOME one.
Department of jails has some data before hand to work on expansions at last. So dont you think SADHU system in India will be more favored by those who dont want to be criminals?

Rajan Dubey

Socioeconomic movement of female foeticide They will still not be in GDP contributors list but surely SAHDU will be better managed group than a criminal heard. IS social research team of Indian POLICE listening .. Ok more thoughts on this. Low supply and more prestigious position in society will make Prostitution costly and new entrants will be less economically benefited. Social workers can pat their own backs because this is the time they can break the cycle of even familial prostitution societies. Low availability of prostitution in female part but male CSW will increase so some cause of worry for another breed of social workers working their bread through anti HIV campaigns. Watch out for eunuch and sadhu societies As some administrator of an ANTI social groups or govt or MILITIA pro patriotic or against both will have lot to recruit for. My advice to govt .. make some phony system like : nagar sainiks or something of sort for military intelligence : and that too because these lowest bottom wont qualify your norms for physical endurance in regulars of pro-patriotic killing forces. So to deter them from joining your opposite group you need to lower down your standard or start recruiting at age of 5-9 from poor parents. I believe they will happily give away this unwanted male to you. Making women join military at this point of time is a bad idea hon women leaders because they are already precious before we all understood and if they stuck to these places to show their equality they will further alienate these men waiting in criminal squads. And yes all lords of development world Rs 32 for BPL also doesnt counts for : Entertainment cost : meaning Cinema, low cost Sex and locally stimulating thrills like drugs and drinks and of course crime is left to these unwanted men.

Rajan Dubey