Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
A Jewish Sourcebook
ii
Daas Torah
A Jewish Sourcebook
Compiled & translated by
Daniel Eidensohn
Author: Yad Moshe, Yad Yisroel, Child & Domestic Abuse (3 volumes)
Second Revised Edition Includes English texts only Hebrew to be published separately Emunah Press Jerusalem-New York 2011
Daas Torah
A Jewish Sourcebook 2011 Daniel Eidensohn 124 Parkville Avenue Brooklyn, New York 11230 e-mail yadmoshe@gmail.com Daas Torah blog http://daattorah.blogspot.com/ All rights reserved including that of copying by all means including photographic and electronic. This also applies to the translation as well as edited Hebrew text. In other words - no Xeroxing of pages is allowed without written permission from the author - even for good purposes. Violating this prohibition constitutes stealing.
Resources utilized The following data bases were utilized. Bar Ilans Responsa Data Base, Davkas Judaica Classics, DBSs Data Base, and Encyclopedia Judaica. Rabbi Aryeh Kaplans Handbook of Jewish Thought. Rabbi Menachem Kashers Torah Shleima and Rabbi Dr. Shmuel Adlers Aspaklaria were also indispensable. A number of English translations were useful aids in my translation: Soncino Tanach, Talmud, Medrash and Zohar. Rabbi Aryeh Kaplans Living Torah. Rabbi Chavels Ramban. Rabbi Eliyahu Munks Rabbeinu Bachye, Akeidas Yitzchok, Shaloh and Ohr HaChaim. iv
Rabbinic Guidance When I started thinking about this project years ago, various concerns were raised about the appropriateness of making a sourcebook. I consulted with a number of talmidei chachomim who validated the idea of a theological sourcebook containing a range of views. It is important to note that none of these rabbis were involved in the actual composition of this sourcebook nor did they see the resulting compendium prior to publication. I am solely responsible for its contents. Rav Eliyashiv stated that making a sourcebook with a range of views was permitted. Furthermore, the fact that conflicting views might cause confusion in some readers was not a reason to avoid teaching them. He stated that any confusion that might result should be clarified by consulting the readers rabbi or rosh yeshiva. However, he indicated there were two conditions for a legitimate sourcebook. Firstly, that the sources needed to be accepted ones and not those from recently discovered manuscripts of questionable validity. Secondly, the views needed to be the authentic views of major authorities - and not the distorted assertions found in some polemical works. While I believe I have succeeded in fulfilling these conditions there is not universal agreement as to which material should be classified as mainstream. For example, concerning the Rambans statement on Agada, there are many - such as Rav Yaakov Kaminetsky - who asserted that it is not the authentic view of the Ramban. However, the Chasam Sofer accepted it as valid. When faced with this type of dispute between recognized authorities, I have brought the views from both sides. I have not attempted to decide between positions or give my personal opinion concerning who is right. This is in accord with the advice of Rav Moshe Shapiro. While he told me to proceed with writing this sefer, he advised me not to present my own views or interpretations and to let the sources speak for themselves. Rav Nachman Bulman helped me clarify what I was trying to do and provided encouragement. Rav Moshe Heinemann spent time clarifying issues and validating the project. Rav Joseph Elias provided valuable sources when I first started working on this project. Rav Noach Weinberg told me that studying theology was important especially for baalei teshuva. Rav Yaakov Weinberg was encouraging and provided critical understanding of some of the underlying issues. Rav Avraham Pessin reviewed some issues and provided me with unique insights. Rav Moshe Chaim Geldtzahler has provided important help as well as profound comments on some of these issues. Rav Yosef Rottenbergs deep understanding and commonsense opened new vistas.
iii
iv
Table of Contents
Table of Contents .................................................................................................................... v Preface: Why study Theology? by Rav Triebitz .......................................................... 1 Purpose of the Sourcebook ................................................................................................. 7 Principles for Using this Sourcebook .............................................................................10 G-d requires Specific Spiritual Achievements ...........................................................15 Teachers: Nature & Importance......................................................................................19 Ignorance: Not an Excuse for Sinning ...........................................................................25 Kiddush HaShem: Sanctifying G-ds Reputation .......................................................30 Chilul HaShem: Profaning G-ds Reputation ...............................................................31 Convert: Can be more spiritual than born Jew ..........................................................34 Spirituality & Decency: Torah & Natural Law ............................................................36 Sinning: Why does a Religious Person sin? .................................................................41 Beliefs: Sources & Kabbalistic Influences ...................................................................44 Agada & Medrash: Source of Theological Beliefs ......................................................53 Beliefs: Are Obligatory in Judaism .................................................................................66 Beliefs: Some Foundation Principles ............................................................................76 Heretical Beliefs: Prohibited by Judaism.....................................................................82 Martyrdom: Dying for Correct Beliefs ..........................................................................99 Beliefs: Some have Changed over Time ..................................................................... 103 Jewish Personality Traits ............................................................................................... 107 Skepticism: Inherently a Jewish trait ......................................................................... 110 Chutzpa (brazenness): Essential for Spirituality ................................................... 112 Faith: Innate but must be developed ......................................................................... 115 Faith: Not identical with Knowledge? ........................................................................ 120 Simple Faith: Is Best (Emuna Peshuta) ..................................................................... 127 Simple Faith: Its Problems ............................................................................................. 135 Intellectual Faith: Is Best (Theology) ......................................................................... 142 Intellectual Faith: Its Problems .................................................................................... 153 Sage/Tzadik: Aspect & Dwelling Place of G-d ......................................................... 165 Tradition (Mesora): Rabbis Transmit & Create ..................................................... 174
Torah is not in Heaven: Man decides Halacha ........................................................ 187 Innovation (Chidush): Needed for Spirituality ....................................................... 190 Innovation (Chidush): Prohibited? Chadash Assur .............................................. 196 Truth: Objectivity or Will of G-d................................................................................... 199 Eilu vEilu: Multiple Truths or One? ............................................................................ 204 Truth: Greater importance than Authority ............................................................. 209 Seeing is more Real than Beliefs or Hearing ........................................................... 211 Knowledge: Clear Awareness of Truth ...................................................................... 214 Knowledge: Basis is Torah & Prophesy ..................................................................... 223 Philosophy: Relationship with Torah ........................................................................ 225 Secular Knowledge vs. Torah Knowledge ................................................................ 233 Reshus: Activity that is neither mitzva nor sin?..................................................... 242 Questions: Essential to Understanding ..................................................................... 243 Answers: Parameters of Legitimacy ........................................................................... 260 Distort views: For Authority/Education/Kiruv ..................................................... 266 Preserving Society by suspending Torah laws ....................................................... 272 Daas Torah: Authentic Jewish way of Thinking ..................................................... 275 Daas Torah: Ask Gedolim all Issues ............................................................................ 280 Daas Torah: View of Rav Moshe Feinstein ............................................................... 284 Gedolim: Fallibility? ......................................................................................................... 286 Infallibility because of Ruach Hakodesh? ................................................................ 291 Rabbinic Authority Sources....................................................................................... 310 Majority Rule must submit? ....................................................................................... 330 Disagreeing with Post Talmudic Authorities .......................................................... 341 Chazal (Talmudic Sages): Uniqueness ....................................................................... 361 Disagreeing with Chazal ................................................................................................. 376 Disagreements amongst Chazal ................................................................................... 385 Chazal versus Science ...................................................................................................... 389 Racism is prohibited ........................................................................................................ 400 Contentment: Whether Wealthy or Poor .................................................................. 401 Pleasure: Important but only in Moderation ......................................................... 403 Corporal Punishment: Children & Students ............................................................ 405
vi
Providence: Foundation Principle of Belief ............................................................. 409 Providence: Denying or Rejecting ............................................................................... 417 Providence: Attribute good & bad events to G-d ................................................... 422 Providence: G-d has Knowledge of Man .................................................................... 427 Providence: G-d intervenes in World ......................................................................... 430 Providence: Individual or only in General ............................................................... 440 Tzadik: Protected from Harm ....................................................................................... 460 Mazel & Magic versus Providence ............................................................................... 472 Astrology & Fortune-telling are Prohibited? .......................................................... 481 Marriage: Predestined or Reward/Punishment? .................................................. 487 Life is only Good for the Tzadikim .............................................................................. 491 Suicide: To Prevent Sexual Sins or Repent............................................................... 492 Suffering: Reasons & Benefits ....................................................................................... 496 Suffering: Reacting Positively & Cherishing It ........................................................ 505 Suffering: Complaining about G-d causing It ........................................................... 515 Free-will: Harming others despite Providence ...................................................... 532 Suffering: Always from Sin or is also Natural?........................................................ 543 Anger at Others is Wrong: G-d causes Everything ................................................ 561 Reincarnation: Suffering for Previous Existence ................................................... 566 Suffering: Beyond our Understanding ....................................................................... 568 Suffering: From Love (yesurim shel ahava) ............................................................. 574 Suffering: Others Rejoice or feel Sad? .................................................................... 581 Suffering: In spite of Bitachon ...................................................................................... 586 Suffering: Childrens Reasons .................................................................................... 591 Suffering: Tzadik/Moshiach - Reasons ...................................................................... 593 Time of G-ds Anger: Even Righteous Suffer ............................................................ 605 Messianic Age & Suffering .............................................................................................. 607 G-d Suffers ............................................................................................................................ 608 Trials & Tests: Historical Examples ............................................................................ 609 Trials & Tests: Acquiring Faith & Reward ................................................................ 618 Bitachon: Security from Trusting G-d ........................................................................ 632 Bitachon: Tzadikim sometimes lack or dont want .............................................. 666
vii
Bitachon: Without Effort produces Success ............................................................. 686 Work: Relationship to Torah ........................................................................................ 704 Work: Obligation & Purpose ......................................................................................... 714 Effort: Required but does not Cause of Success ..................................................... 724 Prayer: Relationship to Effort or Bitachon .............................................................. 754 Sickness Repent or Doctor ............................................................................................. 763 Rosh HaShanna: Determines Success for Year? ..................................................... 779 6 Day War & Entebbe: Miracles or Nature? ............................................................. 782 War: Effort vs. Bitachon .................................................................................................. 785 Miracles ................................................................................................................................. 789 Hebrew Endnotes ......................................................................................................... - 812 -
viii
bounties and disasters emphasizing collective responsibility, while the existential experience of Sinai emphasizes a unique individual spiritual approach. This would seem paradoxical in light of the fact that performance of the commandments usually depends solely on the individual Jew whereas the revelation at Sinai was a national experience, upon which the Jewish nation was founded. The resolution of this paradox can only be explained by the intrinsic interdependence of the individual and the community which forms a dyadic unity unto itself. (This will be elaborated in a future work.) 2) The first verse uses the verb to teach, whereas the second verse utilizes the verb to tell, or to make known. Teaching refers primarily to an intellectual activity, while story-telling requires a more visceral mode of transmission. This distinction would seem to make sense in light of the fact that we are dealing with the two very different epistemological types. One is more legal and analytic, requiring the transmission of clearly elucidated concepts, while the other involves the transmission of an existential state of revelation and spirituality. In other words, legal study by definition involves scholarship, while describing transient experiences seems incompatible with an intellectual process. How can they both be considered aspects of the commandment to study Torah? We find a possible reconciliation of the study and experience duality in the views of the medieval commentator Seforno. Seforno5(Deuteronomy 4:9) interprets the phrase and you shall tell your children to be formulating the existential experience in terms of conceptual proofs. These intellectual proofs can then be transmitted to those who were not actually present at Sinai to witness the revelation. 3) The final distinction I would like to note is the difference in enumeration of generations between these two verses. The legal study verse only lists two generations - parents and children - while the faith study verse lists three generations - parents, children and grandchildren. The profound significance of this distinction is noted in the Talmudic discussion in tractate Kiddushin (30a). Having discussed the salient syntactical and semantical distinctions between these two verses, we can now proceed to the corresponding consequences of these distinctions. Knowledge of these consequences will help us understand the distinction between the methodologies of faith-study and legal-study. 1) The first distinction noted was between the singular formulation of faith-study as opposed to the plural formulation of legal-study. The significance of this can best be understood in light of the fact that the Ten Commandments spoken to the Jewish people at Sinai are all stated in the singular. This is understood by the commentators as expressing the personal aspect of the Sinai revelation. As explained above, the medium of conveyance of the Commandments at Sinai points to the faith study of the Torah. Faith, it is argued, is a more intensely individual experience and as such demands a more individualized imperative. The legal study of the Torah which has a greater legal dimension requires a less subjective and more objective orientation and is therefore expressed in the plural. On the basis of this, we can draw an analogy to the two verses at hand, and their respective commandments to engage in the study of Torah. The goal of faith-study is to direct a person to a more perfect and complete faith in G-d and is therefore expressed in the singular. In contrast, legal study is expressed and formulated in the plural. This idea is beautifully expressed in the Tannaic commentary to Deuteronomy (Sifrei 6 - Parshas Eikev): Is it your desire to recognize the One who spoke and created the world? Study Agada, for thereby you shall recognize Him. The faith-study of the Torah in fact deals primarily with the
Daas Torah
Aggadic part of the Torah. Therefore, we see that faith study is being equated with knowledge of G-d - the very essence of the first two commandments. The language of the Sages, your desire to recognize, is a beautiful expression of the highly intensive personal dimension which is intrinsic in the study of Agada, and in the study of the faith of the Torah in general. A pedagogical consequence of this is that the approach to the study of hashkofa must take into careful consideration the specific needs, goals, and desires, of each individual in order that he is allowed to personally recognize the One who spoke and created the world. 2) The second distinction was the distinction between the verbs to teach and to tell. The to tell of faith-study is related to the methodology of converting psychological and intuitive insights into clearly expressed language and concepts, and the inverse process of penetrating language and ideas to their core psychological and intuitive origins and recesses. The purpose of this is to capture the inner spiritual experience of Sinai when the Jewish people witnessed clearly G-ds word and Moses prophecy. An important goal of the faith study of the Torah is that the formal intellectual process of analysis touches the spiritual consciousness of the student so that his faith is properly felt as well as thought. A Cartesian type dichotomy of mind and body undermines the faith study process, for it does not produce true believers. In fact the relationship between thought and feeling, idea and intuition, must be truly hybrid and coexistent. Just as analysis must be buttressed by feeling, intuition, and psychological insight - they in turn must be buttressed by analysis. That is because lack of logical clarity can produce a feeling of uncertainty and inner confusion which is dangerous to personal faith. For this reason, the study of faith requires the harmonization of thought and feeling to attain his goal of understanding. 3) The third and final distinction involves the contrast between the dyadic father - son formulation of legal-study with the triadic grandfather father - grandson formulation of faith-study. This distinction can be understood best in terms of viewing study of the Torah as an interpretation of sacred canonical texts, with the teacher and/or father viewed as the text, and the student and/or son viewed as the one who studies and interprets the text. This process is a central feature of all Torah study. In terms of this model, the legal-study of the Torah is formulated in the Pentateuch as a text and an interpretation. The faith-study of the Torah, however, is formulated as a text (grandfather), an interpretation of the text (son), and a second, perhaps alternative, interpretation of the same text (grandson), or even a more general interpretation which mediates between the text and its interpretation. Where the dyadic formulation of legal-study is essentially a dialectic of text and interpretation, effort and resistance which produces a clear legal conclusion, the triadic formulation of faith-study produces a multiplicity of interpretation each representing an irreducible truth - these and these are words of the living G-d. This expresses the very nature of Aggadic interpretation which seeks to produce multiple interpretations which serve to express the multi-dimensional ontology of Aggadic and hashkofic concepts. On a pedagogical level, the faith-study of the Torah is essentially the discovery and elaboration of the spectrum of ideas which defines both the possibilities and boundaries of acceptable positions. A consequence of this is that the student must be exposed to a full spectrum of hashkofic thought in order to fully appreciate the issues, and then formulate his own position. The implications of these three principles and their relevance to this volume will be discussed in detail in the final section.
II
Traditional Jewish historiography views the progression of time as epochal. Each epoch is distinguished by a unique spiritual ontology which provides the tools for earmarking historical events and developments from a Torah perspective. For example, the Talmud in tractate Avoda Zara7(9a) divides up all of history into three epochs. There are also the Rabbinical divisions of the Patriarchal pre-Sinaic epoch, the Tannaic epoch and the Amoraic epoch. These epochs are frequently delineated by epochal compendiums which conclude the earlier epoch and provide the starting point for the next one. Hence, the Mishnaic compendium of Rabbi Judah the Prince concludes the Tannaic period and forms the interpretive text of the Amoraic period. The Talmudic compendium of Ravina and Rav Ashi concludes the Amoraic era and serves as the interpretive texts of the medieval era known as the Rishonim. The significance of inter-epochal compendiums is more than the facility of transition between eras it is the device through which a veritable continuum of Tradition is preserved through the vicissitudes of Jewish history. The commensurable dialogue between seemingly different eras is a hallmark of the Jewish claim to authentic tradition in contradistinction to postmodernist views of irreducible paradigms which by definition resist communication and, hence, continuity. It is important to note the famous words of Rabbi Yosef Karo in his introduction to his commentary to the Tur: Who will be brazen enough to place his head between the lofty mountains to resolve their disputes based on rational argumentsfor due to our many sins, our minds are too constricted to be able to understand them, let alone to surpass them (in halachic resolution) Through the words of Rabbi Yosef Karo, who authored the authoritative Jewish code of law known as the Shulchan Aruch, we are able to understand the very nature and purpose of inter-epochal compendiums. That is, to create the medium through which an intra-epochal dialectic can now be canonized and serve as the basis for the halachic decisions of the next epoch. In addition, this very medium will serve as the textual basis for the intra-epochal dialectic of the next epoch. This methodology is what preserves the integrity of the halachic process, and insures the continuity and authenticity of the Torah from Moses to the present day. The concept of inter-epochal compendiums is not only a halachic concept but also an Aggadic and hashkofic one. Whether it is the non-legal parts of the Pentateuch itself, or the Aggadic texts of the Tannaic and Amoraic eras, inter-epochal compendiums provide the basis through which the faith-study of the Torah is taught and communicated across generations. While the ontological basis of this idea is rooted in the structure of Jewish spirituality, the details of which are certainly beyond the scope of this introduction, we clearly see the usefulness of the compendium concept in all areas of Torah study. In addition to the canonical compendiums discussed above, there is a utilitarian value, in my opinion, to non-canonical compendiums as well, especially in areas where there is no central access to the relevant ideas. The present volume which you now hold in your hands is an example of such a compendium. It is a work desperately needed in order to communicate the faith of the Torah to those Jews who are deeply steeped in todays post-modernist culture. It is found, unfortunately, in todays age, that even highly educated people who are intellectually open, have difficulty comprehending and therefore relating to the faith-study of the Torah. To my mind, this is
Daas Torah
partly due to the lack of a suitable compendium to facilitate the commensurable transmission from the thoughts of the most important rabbinical thinkers and commentators to todays Torah-hostile intellectual environment. The present volume serves admirably to redress this egregious lack. In this impressive compendium, Rabbi Eidensohn has provided the Torah world with an invaluable treasure. It is the fruit of many years of arduous labor of selecting, arranging and translating thousands of citations. It places before the reader the rich spectrum of Daas Torah in a number of crucial areas of Jewish thought. Part of the uniqueness of this volume is that it presents the ideas in their original exposition. It avoids the use of modern and postmodern (i.e., non-Jewish) concepts and interpretations. These non-Torah concepts are often used to produce an apologetic politically correct theology. Instead, this volume presents the pure undiluted expression of Torah-true concepts. In other words, it lets the sources speak for themselves without distillation or interpretation. This was done in order that the teacher and student can literally stand at Mount Sinai and relive the existential experience of the Giving of the Torah in its most pure and direct form.
III
In the first section of the introduction, I presented the three basic principles which underlie the faith-study of the Torah. In the second section, I discussed the phenomenology of the Jewish spiritual-legal continuity across historical and cultural divides. This continuity provides the basis for the authentic transmission of Jewish faith and thought. This volume, which you are now reading, is a productive tool for integrating these two pillars in the construction of a pedagogical approach to the faith study of the Torah. It involves a process constituting three steps. 1) Surveying the spectrum of opinions on each topic and organizing them into a coherent ordering running from the more visceral, intuitive, existential positions to the more analytical and conceptual positions. (This corresponds to principle #3 above) 2) Establishing a dialectic between the visceral-intuitive view and the rational-analytic view which will bring out the important underlying dyadic dynamic of the issue which faces the student. (This corresponds to principle #2 above) 3) Seeking out the individual approach of the student which comes from the visceral-analytic dyad in order to produce a powerful personal hashkofa and approach to the issue involved. (This corresponds to principle #1 above)
2) The usage of this volume to teach the material to someone intelligent - yet uninitiated - requires a painstaking organization of the material. In particular, it requires an eye and ear to the specific needs and goals of each student. In this way, the sheer volume of material can be made manageable and allow the student to absorb the material and not feel overwhelmed. 3) At every stage, it is always important to consult a proper rabbinical authority - both with regard to methodology and content. Indeed, not every Rabbinical authority will necessarily be an expert in every area of Hashkofa, and they may well steer questioners to higher authorities. This is crucial in order to achieve the maximum success and avoidance of pitfalls which always arrives by attempting to teach new material and a different way of thinking. My advocacy of the present volume as a teaching resource is not just based upon the above theory but also my personal experience. I have successfully utilized part of this material - some of which is found in the present volume and some from the future volumes - in teaching a select group of students. The results have exceeded our expectations. Despite its apparent daunting nature - in practice it leads to spirited discussion and spiritual growth not obtainable by other means.
It is my blessing and prayer that this magnificent volume will reach out to a people starving to once again stand at the foothold of Mount Sinai and hear again the Word of G-d as He spoke to the Jewish people and to Moses His prophet. Rav Meir Triebitz
I would like to acknowledge the vital help and advice I have received from all my students at Machon Shlomo, the Moreshet and Maalot Institutes at Neve Yerushalayim, Kollel Derech HaChaim and the think-tank. Most notably Andrew Kaye, Jake Greenberg, Dan Shatzman, Prof. David Rier, Zevy Horowitz, Gamliel Shmalo. My discussions with Rabbi Dr. Dovid Refson have sensitized me to the challenges of kiruv. Working with Rabbi Beryl Gershenfeld has given me the opportunity to carry them out in practice
Daas Torah
discussionthe Talmudic scholar knows how to determine the fundamental concept underlying the principles. In fact in exactly the same way that the Talmud is analyzed so it is necessary to study the fundamental theological principles of the Torah. This search for universal principles and concepts is not just limited to Torah study but also applies to personality traits Thus, we find the great masters of mussar looking for fundamental principles underlying proper personality and behavior. Consequently, a person should strive to be a true scholar (lamdan) in all areas - including personality and spiritual perfection. This requires many years of devoted effort
Daas Torah
10
Daas Torah
11
and lovers of G-d to the ultimate degree - they were also upright. That means that they conducted themselves in relation to the peoples of the world - even the debased idol worshippers - with love and were concerned about their welfare in regards to the preservation of Creation. This we see in the pleading of Avraham for the people of Sedom - even though he had total hatred for them because of their wickedness - nevertheless he wanted them to live
12
Daas Torah
are limits to his intellect. He needs to accept the explanations of our Sages for every word and letter of the Torah. That is because the language of the Torah is not ordinary language and is not based on our understanding. Therefore, in order to understand the Torah requires tremendous mental abilities, pure study in a sanctified manner, and a reliable direct tradition. Only by means of the traditions of our Sages, who knew how to explain and interpret every letter in the Torah, are we able to comprehend even a tiny part of Torah. These words of the Rambam apply to all aspects of the Torah including Halacha and agada, laws and stories. None of them are properly understood by relying solely on untrained human understanding. Furthermore, one needs to take the greatest care in understanding the stories found in the Torah since they are extremely likely to be misunderstood. These misunderstandings have great consequence and undermine the foundation of the Jewish people. It is obvious from what we have said that it is prohibited to say that some aspect of Torah should have been written differently or is unnecessary. Such an attitude constitutes rejection of the Torah and causes eternal punishment and loss of the World to Come. According to the Halacha (Rambam Teshuva 8:8), a rejecter of the Torah is one who asserts that even a single letter was not said by G-d. It is even prohibited to say that some words of Torah (e.g., the Ten Commandments) are more important than others 2) It is one of the basic principles of Torah that every letter of the Torah includes and is necessary for Creation itself Bereishis Rabbah (1:1): G-d looked into the Torah and created the world. Eiruvin (13a): A scribe has to be very careful in writing a Torah because if he deletes or adds one letter he destroys the world. Also included in the Torah are all events - past present and future - of the entire universe and concerning every one of us...
13
Maharal32(Chidushei Agada Avoda Zara 19a): The reason that a person only learns the Torah that he finds interesting is because Torah requires a connection to the recipient. That is why it is called his Torah when he accepts it. Therefore, one should only learn that which he finds interesting because then he will relate to it and it will be his Torah.
14
Daas Torah
Rav Wolbe41(Alei Shor 1:167): There are three different historical eras [concerning the Gras idea of learning about ones true self through prophecy.] 1) Originally the prophets ascertained for every individual his unique service of G-d according to the source of his soul. 2) the nature of everyones service of G-d was established through the lower level of ruach hakodesh but this was associated with a great danger. That is because if his spiritual state was not pure he would end up establishing his path in service of G-d according to his biases and subjective feelings. This could lead to him to determine his actions primarily for his own pleasure and desires but he wouldnt be aware of his error because he would think that he had ascertained everything entirely through ruach hakodesh. 3) The third era is that of our modern era. No one even tries to establish his unique path in serving G-d and instead we concern ourselves entirely with whether our deeds are according to G-d will. It is important to note that the Gra is not saying that now we dont have the ability to go in the path of greatness and wonders and that therefore the entire concern with ones unique service of G-d is terminated. Rather the Gras intent seems to be that in our generation we can no longer determine our unique service of G-d by means of ruach hakodesh according to the source of our soul and the physical nature of our bodies. The reason why use of ruach hakodesh is no longer done is because subjective biases and errors are common today. Therefore we are only left with the option of trying the best we can to act according to G-ds will. This determines our program and our goals. We learn which mitzvos are easy for us to fulfill and which ones are difficult. We ascertain which attributes to eliminate and which ones are desirable to acquire. We determine which approach makes it easy for us to accept much work and which approach we are grateful when we achieve even a little. Consequently it is through our interests in how to fulfill the mitzvos and to improve our personality we are able to determine the nature of our unique service of G-d. [Look at the introduction to this chapter concerning the Gra]. Therefore even in our generation each person is obligated to do his unique service of G-d. A person concerned with spiritual growth cannot be satisfied by simply observing the mitzvos. He is obligated to clarify and improve and perfect himself in the area of his personality and conduct. To the degree that he is focused on his genuine uniqueness to that degree he is praiseworthy. Rav Wolbe42(Alei Shor 2:550): G-d judges every single individual according to what he is that means according to his true nature and who can survive that judgment? When G-d created man he planted in the source of his soul that means his true nature the rules that govern his life. In other words the guidelines for his unique existence. Therefore each man was sent into this world to fulfill the mission in this world that he alone is able to fulfill. That mission is implanted into the source of each mans soul. This is alluded to in Mishlei (22:20) When a person returns to G-d at the end of his life this is the basis of his judgment did he in fact act truly in accord with his mission according to what he is? It seems from the Maharal that the true self of a person is ascertained through experience if not G-d forbid! through suffering. Bereishis Rabbah (32:3), G-d tests the tzadik, The artisan does not test a bad container which is not strong enough to withstand a blow without breaking. What does he test? Only the good containers that even if they are hit many times they do not break. So it is with G-d. He does not test the wicked but only the righteous as it says, G-d tests the tzadik and it says G-d tested Avraham. It is only in regards to what has been implanted in the essence of his being that a person is tested because that is what he has the ability to withstand. If it hadnt been that Avraham had learned the entire Torah on his own in his youth, G-d would not have tested him by means of the Akeidah in his old age. (This that we typically call tests, are in fact only the difficulties that we bring on ourselves through our sins. In truth they are not truly tests which G-d brings chas vshalom). This is the reason for the beracha of the true judge. That means that G-d judges man justly according to his true essence and according to mans true essence brings on him the events of his life and his death. However these matters are too theoretical and abstract. Ones true self is so concealed in a person that a person like ourselves is not able to determine what it actually means. Who amongst us is capable
16
Daas Torah
of knowing what the principles of our lives actually are? Nevertheless despite our apparent inability to ascertain our intrinsic life principles we are judged specifically on whether we accomplished them. Obviously then a person is expected to determine what his personal life principles are. The Gra reveals to us an amazing approach to understanding this profound matter and many important things are learned from his holy words in his explanation of Mishlei (16:1-4). All paths of man follow after the Prime Will. In other words there is an intuition and innate instinct that correctly provides guidance for a persons action but that is only if the person is perfected without selfdeceit and bias However this Prime Will is not the wish that pops into a persons mind as to whether he should eat or sleep or other similar matters. It is also not the desire to be a shoemaker or carpenter. The Gra concept of Prime Will is what the Maharal calls the true self. It is the rules of ones life which contained in a hidden will which directs all of mans life. This is ultimately the highest power in man and as is known that higher a power is the more concealed it is and thus this is the most concealed aspect of a person. However man cannot simply decide to utilize it to know whether he is refined and fully developed or not. That is because a person will follow his intuition even if it is determined by self-deception. Therefore the Gra notes that since a person views all the paths that he is attracted to as good he cannot simply rely on his human understanding or thoughts. Consequently the Gra advices that one should first and foremost ascertain that your deeds are in accord with G-ds wishes and that you also direct your thoughts to be in accord with G-ds will. Everything was created for G-ds honor. Even the wicked person was created for that bad day when there will be punishment for those who turn from G-ds commandments. This also clarifies what is meant by G-ds will you should know that whatever is done it is for the sake of G-d i.e., the Written and the Oral Torah. The basic idea of these four verses is to provide an approach for a person to conduct himself and to be in accord with G-ds will and good advice. That is because each and every person has a unique way that he should follow. Because peoples thinking differs one from another and their faces are not identical and the basic natures of any two people are not identical. When there were prophets people would go to them To inquire of G-d (Bereishis 25:22). The prophet would tell him according to the principles of prophecy the path in life that he should follow according to the unique essence of his soul and according to his physical nature The Gra continues by saying that when prophecy ceased there remained ruach hakodesh that a person could know within himself his proper path. This is indicated by Yeshaya (40:13), Or from whom besides G-d does a person know what is best for himself. The fact is that each person has ruach hakodesh. However the Gra concludes from Tanna Dbei Eliyahu (2:8) that a person can only utilize this ruach hakodesh when he is free from sin and his thoughts are directed to G-d. These words of the Gra throw new light on the period of Prophets and on the circumstances of life in this period. Whoever wanted to know his path in life went to the prophet. The prophet revealed to him his proper program according to the source of his soul. That is because the prophet perceived, by means of his prophesy, the persons true self. With this knowledge the prophet was able to give a precise prescription of how the person should conduct himself in life and what his mission to help perfect the world was. However with the cessation of the period of Prophets there still remained ruach hakodesh amongst Israel. Every individual by means of his own ruach hakodesh was able to ascertain his true self and to recognize the way he should conduct his life. There is no question that in that post prophetic period there were individuals who used their ruach hakodesh and were successful. However utilization of ruach hakodesh is predicated on not having any biases or selfdeception. If there was even the slightest distortion and bias it would lead to distortion and error his understanding even if he was utilizing ruach hakodesh! The reality of this danger is learned from Korach who through his ruach hakodesh saw that the prophet Shmuel would be his descendant. This knowledge enabled him to rationalize his dispute with Moshe. He simply didnt realize that he wasnt free of jealousy. This is simply incredible. The Gra clarifies this point by saying, But who can say that they have a pure heart without any deception or bias at all and that there nature
doesnt lust or incline to anything besides the will of G-d?With the decline of the generations it becomes increasingly difficult to merit having pure ruach hakodesh as has been explained by R Chaim Vital in his introduction to Shaarei Kedusha that today all prophetic visions have been blocked Therefore our path today is to make sure our deeds are devoted to G-d concerning involvement in Torah study and fulfilling the mitzvos properly. Torah study means to ascertain G-ds will in each topic and not to study for the sake of new interpretations or principle. The focus needs to be solely on clarifying G-ds will - that is contained in the depths of every topic in the gemora. Similarly the fulfillment of mitzvos properly means to observe them precisely without regard whether they are from Choshen Mishpat or Orech Chaim whether they are mitzvos of the heart or deed. Every mitzva needs to be done with the full effort required to fulfill it properly. It is through the great and diverse effort that one comes to ascertain G-ds thoughts. It is well tested and proved that one who struggles many years in the study of Torah and the doing of mitzvos without any bias and ulterior motivation and learns much mussar through this over time will have revealed to him his hidden abilities and true insights. His Torah will reveal to him what his mission in life is In this we return to the beginning of the chapter. The ultimate task of a talmid chachom is to come closer to the truth of the Torah. There are of course many levels of accomplishment in this task until he merits to the absolute truth and to understand the subject matter to its final halacha. To the degree to which a person merits the truth of Torah he comes closer to knowing is own true nature. That is the nature of Torah. Therefore a person who strives to understand G-ds will by means of the Torah itself will come to know himself and even his true self.
18
Daas Torah
the sage wishes to transmit the fullness of his wisdom to others, it manifests itself through his entire being and is expressed in his emotions by body movements and facial expressions. Therefore, a student is able to comprehend this inner nature of the wisdom only by close attachment to his teacher.
Distorting views for clarity SEE DISTORTING VIEWS Guidance of wise teacher needed to understand faith
Rambam48(Letter to Yemen): You should know that just as a blind person depends upon a sighted person because he knows that he lacks the ability to determine the correct path, and just as a sick person who is ignorant of medicine depends upon the advice of a doctor for a cure similarly those who are not experts need to rely on the prophets who have the true vision. They teach which ideas are true and which are not. After the period of the prophets came the wise men who exert themselves day and night to study and analyze ideas in order to know which are true and which are false.
20
Daas Torah
many examples where the Sages say things they hadnt heard from their teachers but they are saying it as a logical deduction. Therefore it is possible to say that Rabbi Eliezer would only not say something which was not from logical deduction since he hadnt heard it his teachers mouth. Rambam54(Hilchos Talmud Torah 5:9): A student should not say anything which he has not heard from his teacher unless he mentions who he learned this from. Shach55)Y.D. 242:43): Normally what a student says is assumed by the listeners to be something he heard from his teacher. But if he did not in fact hear it from his teacher it is necessary to say from whom he did learned it. But for something he heard from his teacher, it is appropriate to say without attribution. The Bach writes that it would seem that this rule is only relevant when he only had a single teacher. But if he learned from two different teachers it is necessary to mention from whom he learned it. Nevertheless nowadays it is assumed that what a person says is something he figured out on his own. Therefore this law has changed. But it is definitely prohibited to say something without attribution and surely not to attribute it to himself when in fact it was something he heard from another. That is like glorifying oneself with a garment which is not his. Sukkah56(28a): It was said about Rabbi Yochanon ben Zakkai he never said any matter which he had not heard from his teacher and Rabbi Eliezer his student did likewise.
22
Daas Torah
which is much more commonly said in the mishna. Nevertheless he said hin because that is the way he heard it from his teacher. [.However the Vilna Gaon said that what was said differently is the word malei because this word is totally unnecessary in the mishna and it would have been sufficient to simply say that a hin measure of water disqualifies the mikve. Because Avtalyon the teacher of Hillel was a convert he was not able to pronounce the letter hey in the word hin and he pronounced it in which means no In order that the students should make the mistake that he meant that drawn water doesnt invalidate a mikve, Avtalyon added the world malei (full). Hillel since he pronounced the word correctly but since his teacher added the word malei Hillel added it also.]
Sage: SEE SAGE/TZADIK Serving a teacher is greater than learning from him
Berachos70(47b): Who is an ignorant person (am haaretz)? Others (R Meir) say that even if a person has learned Bible and Mishna but has not served a Torah scholar he is an ignorant person. R Huna says the Halacha is accord with the view of the Others Sefer Chareidim71(16:3): It is a mitzvah to provide assistance to Torah scholars (Shemos 23:25), And you shall serve the L-rd your G-d. We learn from the word es that this includes Torah scholars. In fact we learn from our Tradition that it is greater to serve a Torah scholar than it is to learn Torah as Melachim (1 19:21) praises Elisha for pouring water on Eliyahus hands but doesnt mention that he learned Torah from him. Furthermore Kesubos (96a) teaches, All work that a servant does for his master a student does for his teacher.
Spiritual parent
Sanhedrin72(19b): Whoever teaches someone Torah is considered as if he gave birth to him. This is learned from Moshe who was considered the father of Aarons sons because he taught them Torah. Bava Metzia73(33a): If there is a conflict between recovering ones own lost property or that of either ones father or teacher - ones own property takes precedence. However, if there is a conflict between recovering ones fathers or ones teachers property - then his teacher takes precedence since his father only brought him into this world while his teacher brings him into the World to Come. If his father is also learned then his father takes precedence over his teacher If his father and teacher were in captivity - his teacher should be rescued before his father. If his father is also learned than his father takes precedence over his teacher. Rambam74(Hilchos Talmud Torah): There is no greater honor than that to be accorded to ones teacher. There is also no greater awe than that which one should have for ones teacher. Our sages say that the awe for ones teacher should be comparable to the awe one has of Heaven
questions. Others do not pay attention to these issues They then asked R Abahu to answer their original question. R Abahu said: This is analogous to a man who is owed money by two people one is his friend the other is his enemy. He allows his friend to pay back little by little while his enemy must pay all at once. Rambam76(Treatise on Resurrection): I came to the realization that it was not correct to deal with issues in religion without also explaining and justifying the fundamental principles underlying these issues. This became especially obvious after meeting a person who considered himself one of the great Torah scholars. He was in truth very competent in Jewish law. However he was in doubt as to whether G-d was physical - having eyes, hands, feet and guts as described in Biblical verses. In fact, I have met others from various lands who are very certain that G-d is physical and they consider anyone who disagrees with this view as a denier and heretic. They understand literally the many Talmudic stories that describe G-d in physical terms. I have heard similar reports about other people that I have not met personally. When I learned about these totally lost souls and disgusting people who think they are amongst the great Jewish sages, foolish men who are more disoriented than animals - their minds filled with the nonsensical thoughts of old women and the useless fantasies of children and women - I realized that it was necessary to explain the fundamental Torah principles in my writings on Jewish law...
24
Daas Torah
No mercy for one who suffers because he didnt use his full abilities Beer Sheva82)92a): All those who dont have understanding This means those who dont want
to pay attention and try and understand. Berachos83(33a): Rav Ami said, Great is understanding [deah] because it is placed between two names of G-d (Shmuel 1 2:3). And anyone who doesnt have understanding it is prohibited to have mercy on him as it says (Yeshaya 27:11), For it is a people of no understanding, therefore He that made them will have no compassion upon them. Maharsha84(Sanhedrin 92a): Any man who has no understanding it is prohibited to have mercy on him While it is obvious that one should be merciful to a creature in need but that is only if it hasnt distorted its fundamental nature that it was created with. A man who was created with a unique mind and intelligence if he now lacks this understanding he is not shown mercy Panim Yafos85(Bamidbar 19): Our Sages (Vayikra Rabba 1:15) state, Any man who has no understanding then a dead animal is better than he is. That is because every man in his lifetime needs to fully involve himself in Torah and mitzvos in order to rectify the Tree of Knowledge.
25
Sanhedrin86(92a): Rabbi Eleazar said that any man who is lacking understanding it is prohibited to have mercy on him as it says in Yeshaya (27:11), For it is a people of no understanding: therefore He that made them will not have mercy upon them, and He that formed them will show them no favor. And Rabbi Eleazar said that whoever gives his bread to one who doesnt have understanding will suffer and Rabbi Eleazar said that whoever doesnt have understanding will eventually be sent into exile as it says (Yeshaya 5:13), Therefore my people without understanding were exiled.
26
Daas Torah
Prophecy said it should be killed We see that the Torah requires the offering of a sacrifice for all sins even when done accidentally. That would mean that Prophecy is saying that death is incurred for all sins even when done accidentallyDovid (Tehilim 38:19) said, I describe my sins. Even though I confess my intentional sins I am still worried about my unintentional sins. Because people think that they only need to repent serious sins and in truth even thoughts of sinning require repentance A person not only has to repent for thinking about sinning but also for not thinking about things that would prevent him from sinning.
27
teshuva of R Eliezar ibn Chaim (#113) that the Karaites have the status of Jewish sinners. Also look at the responsa of Rabbeinu Shimshon who is cited by the Mabit (2:38). Also the responsa of R Betzalel(#3). He also writes there that the Karaites in the time of the Rambam had many good qualities in contrast to the way they are now. Shevet HaLevi94(9:198): Question: Concerning an elderly man who has the status of tinok shenishba (a child captured and thus is ignorant of his Torah obligations) is it necessary to show respect for him by standing up for him?... Nevertheless tinok shenishba even if he was amongst non-Jews and now he is amongst Jews and he knows that he is a Jew and even though at times it is possible to consider his behavior as shogeg (accidental) and even ones (beyond his control) but as long as he has not become observant he is no different than a sinner out of lust. Look at Yoreh Deah (241:1) concerning giving charity in such a caseTherefore a secular Jew today if he is classified as being forced against his will to be irreligious because of his bad education nevertheless he knows that there is the Torah. And also if he is given the status of sinner out of lust or even less than that nevertheless he clearly is not acting as a Jew and thus there is no obligation to standup for him according to the straight forward understanding of the halacha as is apparent from the language of the Rema. Nevertheless it is reasonable that there are times when it is appropriate to be respectful of the elderly if he is a simple person at least to speak to him in a respectful manner The Radvaz writes every day we bring these Karaites to repentance and we draw them to believe in the Oral Torah. Nevertheless they blaspheme and debase the rabbis of our tradition and they cannot be judged as acting against their will but in fact they are rejecters of the Oral Torah. Thus the words of the Radvaz. Due to our many sins it is that way today also. The majority of secular education is to contradict the Oral Torah. They explain the Bible against the views of our Sages. Consequently it is difficult to consider them to actually have the status of tinok shenishba even though it is certain that they have no choice in the matter due to their bad education which is given to them. Therefore it would appear as we mentioned above that it should be sufficient to honor them verbally. Yabiya Omer95(E. H. 3:21): Greater than this we find concerning the Karaites of modern times who are considered tinok shenishba amongst the non-Jews. Nevertheless if they are warned about their transgressions but they dont want to return to observing the Oral Torah they are to be killed. This is stated in the Mishna LeMelech (Hilchos Malve vloveh 5:2) in the name of the Mabit and the Radvaz. This is also the view of Maharam ben Chaviv in Kol Gadol (#27). Nevertheless they are invalid to serve as witnesses as is stated in the Maharksh (#33). And this is surely true concerning those non-observant Jews who are found amongst us and they see that the religious woman cover their hair and wear modest clothing. Therefore it is certain that after they have been warned and cautioned regarding religious observance they are considered as deliberately transgressing the Torah. And even R Akiva Eiger who permits those who shave with a razor to be witnesses because they dont think that shaving is prohibited that is only where they have not been warned against the practice. However if they were informed that they are not valid witnesses because of shaving it is clear from his teshuva that they are invalid witnesses. And surely where the beis din warns her and instructs here that an action is completely prohibited if she transgresses what she was warned about she is divorced and doesnt receive her kesubah because she is viewed as deliberately sinning and there is no greater religious transgression than this. Yabiya Omer96(E. H. 8:12.2): We can conclude from all of these sources that the majority of poskim rule that the Karaites are invalid witnesses according to the Torah. It would follow from this that their marriages are not valid either when done before their witnesses. I saw in the Igros Moshe (E.H. 82.11 page 215b) that he cites the Rambam (Hilchos Aidus 5:11 and Hilchos Mamrim 3:3) that we have already mentioned. Rav Moshe writes even the children of the Karaites and grandchildren who have been misled by their ancestors and there they are considered tinok shenishba which is ones (against their will) that is only in regards to law that they are not put in
28
Daas Torah
the pit or saved. However in regards to testimony they are definitely invalid. That is because as long they are mistaken and dont observe Judaism properly they are no better than a non-Jew and are invalid to be witnesses. That is because once they have seen the righteous and proper Jews and they have the opportunity to follow in their ways and they chose to continue following in the ways of their wicked ancestors they are now considered deliberately sinning and therefore they are invalid witnesses. (See also Igros Moshe E.H. 4:32.7 page 76a). Also look at Ginas Veradim (O.H. 3:1 page 49b).
29
30
Daas Torah
31
one specific to the person. The first general principle is that whoever is told to transgress the prohibition against idol worship or the prohibited sexual relations or murder even if it is not a time of forced conversions is obligated to give up his life and be killed rather than transgress However if he transgresses rather than die he has in fact profaned G-ds name and has transgress this prohibition. Furthermore if this was done publicly i.e., in front of 10 Jews then he profaned G-ds name in public and this is an extremely serious sin. Nevertheless he is not flogged because he was forcedThe second general principle is that if a person sins without any lust for that sin and without any enjoyment but does it purely to rebel and through off the yoke of Heaven this is also chilul Hashem and he is flogged. The part that is specific to the person is that a person who is known as one who is refined and good deed who does an action which appears to the masses to be a sin and that appears inappropriate for such a distinguished person to do even though the deed is not a sin he still profanes G-ds name. This is described in Yoma (86a) where it describes examples of chilul HaShem. It says if one of these distinguished sages took meat from the butcher without paying immediately. Another one said that if he walked 4 cubits without discussing Torah or wearing tefilin it would be a chilul HaShem. Rambam106(Shavuos 12:2): The sin of false oaths is amongst the most severe sins as we have explained in Hilchos Teshuva. This is so even though there is no punishment of kares or execution by beis din. Nevertheless there is the desecration of G-d name (chilul HaShem) which is greater than all other sins. Rambam107(Hilchos Teshuva 1:4): Even though that repentance (teshuva) atones for everything and the Day of Yom Kippur itself atones, there are sins for which atonement comes immediately and there are others which the atonement comes later. For example if a person violated a positive commandment whose punishment does not entail kares and he repents. Then his sins are immediately forgivenHowever if he transgresses a negative commandment whose punishment doesnt entail kares or capital punishment and he repented, then the repentance is completed with Yom Kippur If he commits a sin which is punishable by kares or death and then repented, there is not complete atonement even after Yom Kippur but rather he need to die to complete the atonement. Furthermore he doesnt have complete atonement until he has experienced suffering However all this is true only if he hasnt caused the profanation of G-d name (chilul Hashem) by his sin. However if he has caused chilul HaShem, then even if he has repented and Yom Kippur has passed and he remains repentant and he receives physical suffering the complete atonement only happens when he dies. Shulchan Aruch108(Y.D. 242:11): You need to separate a person from sin such as when you see a person who is sinning because he doesnt realize that his action is prohibited or because of his wickedness. It is permitted to stop him and to tell him that his actions are prohibited - even if you say this in the presence of your own rabbi [which is showing disrespect]. The reason that we are not concerned with a lack of respect for your own rabbi is that whenever there is a chilul HaShem (because someone is violating G-ds command) we are do not show deference for our teachers but need to act immediately. Steipler Rav (Within the Domain of Gedolei Torah Volume 2 page 557-560): When Rav Lorenz told the story to the Steipler Rav, the Steipler screamed, A Jew who sins and repeats that sin, it is better that he be punished in this world and not G-d forbid in the World to Come. He explained, The punishment in this world is minor compared to what happens in the World to Come. Furthermore if you succeed in stopping the jail sentence he will continue to repeatedly commit this crime. It is better that he receive his punishment and perhaps learn self-restraintIn addition if I give you permission and you testify for his benefit it is obvious that every newspaper and all the public media will publicize the matter and it will also be a chilul HaShem when he sins again
32
Daas Torah
Yoma109(86a): What is chilul Hashem? Yitzchok of the school of R Yanai said that it is a chilul Hashem when ones colleagues are ashamed because of the rumors that people say about him. R Nachman bar Yitzchok said chilul Hashem results when a person studies Bible, learns Mishna and has intensive interaction with talmidei chachom but is not honest in business and doesnt have a pleasant way of talking with people people say, Woe is the person who studies Torah, woe is his father who taught him Torah, woe is his teacher who taught him Torah because this man studies Torah and look how disgusting his deeds are and how ugly are his ways!
33
34
Daas Torah
yoke of the Kingdom of Heaven Furthermore, we see in Medrash Tanchuma (Noach 3) that the Jewish people had to be forced to accept the Oral Law since it requires so much effort. The only ones who learn it are those that have great love of G-d with their entire heart and soul - and not someone who loves wealth and pleasure We see then that G-d had to force the Jewish people to accept the Oral Law even though in their inner soul they really wanted to accept the Oral LawNevertheless in the revealed aspect of this world which is the world of free will and effort the love of Torah is more manifest amongst converts. Similar Pesachim (91b) states that converts are more careful in their performance of the mitzvos than Jews from birth. Therefore, Rabbi Akiva who was descended from converts merited being the foundation of the Oral Law. In addition, we see that the description of the acceptance of the Torah was written in the section of Yisro - who was the head of all converts - and manifested great love of Torah. He left his high status and wealth to be in the Wilderness with the Jewish people
Kiddush HaShem SEE KIDDUSH HASHEM Kiddush HaShem SEE CHILUL HASHEM Natural law from commonsense
Toras Avraham119(Toras HaSeichel HaEnushi #2): Intellect (seichel) which characterizes man is not simply a means of knowing and understanding data. In fact the intellect is a moral faculty to know what is truly straight. G-d created man with this faculty in order to teach him the path of life. Therefore it is obligatory for man to use it to know what is right and wrong and not to distort his straightness and wholesomeness. It enables him to be a moral judge to understand things in full. Thus man is obligated to keep things which he knows are right - as well as that which he has been commanded directly by G-d. Both obligation serve to direct him properly Rabbeinu Nissim Gaon120(Introduction to Talmud): The reason that there is punishment for activities not specifically commanded is because all those Mitzvos which are derived from commonsense are obligated on everyone from the day that G-d first created Adom HaRishon. Not only him but also all his descendants afterwards for all generations. Rambam121(Moreh Nevuchim 3:17): A person is rewarded for any good deed and punished for sin - even though these activities were not commanded by a prophet. This is because a person is held accountable for those things which are dictated by commonsense. Ramban122(Bereishis 6:13): The generation of the flood was punished for theft because it was an obvious sin. Our Sages (Sanhedrin 108a) say that this sin sealed their fate. That is because it was commonsense that it was a sin, there was no need for a prophets to warn them. Furthermore it was evil to both heaven and man.
36
Daas Torah
Observing Nature
Eruvin123(100b): Even if the Torah hadn't been given it would be possible to learn proper conduct from observing animals. Modesty from the cat, avoidance of theft from ants, avoidance of adultery from the dove and sexual conduct from the rooster.
37
Rambam128(Hilchos Melachim 8:11): Whoever accepts the seven mitzvos of Noach and is careful to observe them is considered one of the pious members of the nations and he has a portion in the World to Come. However, this is true only if the accepts and does them because G-d has commanded them in the Torah and had Moshe inform us about them. However, if he keeps them purely because of his intellectual recognition - he does not have the status of a ger toshav and is not considered amongst the pious of the world and not amongst their wise men [alternatively: or only as one of their wise men]. Rav Wasserman129(Likutei Mamarim v'Michtavim) Non-Jews are required to keep the basic seven mitzvos and they receive punishment for not keeping them. The non-Jew will complain and make what seems a reasonable claim, How was I supposed to know that I was required to keep these mitzvos? However, if you reflect on the issue you will find that belief that G-d created the world is self-evident to all intelligent people. There is no need for profound philosophical analysis to understand this. As the Chovas HaLevavos says, If a person suddenly spilled ink on a blank piece of paper - there is no way he would expect a coherent essay to appear on the page So this raises a rather perplexing question - how can profound and brilliant philosophers conclude that the world is an accident? The resolution of this riddle is found in our Holy Torah which reveals all that is concealed. We find a prohibition for a judge to take a bribe. The amount that constitutes a bribe is the value of a couple cents. Therefore, the foundations of faith are obviously true to anyone who is sane. However, his rational assessment - like that of the judge - only exists if he has not been bribed. This means in our case that he is entirely free from the desires for the unrestricted access to the pleasures of this physical world. We see then that the source of heresy and perverse intellectual beliefs is not due to a breakdown of the mind per se. His failure to see the obvious is because he has been blinded because of his fear of losing what he views as his indispensable pleasures
38
Daas Torah
39
Marrano You idiot do you think that our G-d eats and drinks? It is obvious that the caretaker takes them - not G-d. It is a terrible sin to ascribe any physicality to G-d. The rabbi continued his tirade until the caretaker came in as usual to take the loaves. The caretaker - without the slightest embarrassment - admitted that he had taken them. When the Marrano heard the confession of the caretaker he started to cry. He begged forgiveness from the rabbi that he had erred in understanding the sermon. Suddenly a special messenger entered and announced in the name of the Arizal that the rabbi should immediately return to his home. He explained that on Shabbos morning when the rabbi would be giving his sermon - he would die. The rabbi was shaken by what he heard and went immediately to the house of the Arizal to find out what he had done wrong. The Arizal explained that the rabbis sin was that he had ended the pleasure that G-d had been receiving. That since the destruction of the Temple G-d had not received pleasure comparable to what the Marrano had provided by bringing his two loaves of bread with such purity of heart. Consequently, since the rabbi had stopped the Marranos offering it was decreed that the rabbi had to die and that there was no way the decree could be changed. The next morning while the rabbi was giving his sermon he died as the Arizal had said
40
Daas Torah
41
that is true even for committing sins. R Papa said: That is why people say that even a thief prays for success before committing a robbery. Rabbeinu Bachye142(Kad HaKemach Bitachon): Mishlei (3:6): In all your ways you should know G-d - means in doing mitzvos as well as all other activities. The verse continues, And He will strengthen your paths - which means that besides the reward for having bitachon - which is unbelievably great - he will also be successful. This attribute of bitachon - as noted in Berachos (63a) - even helps success in sin. This is why people say that even a thief before committing his crime - prays for success. Rambam143(Berachos 4:4): The explanation of parshas haIbur is explained in the gemora to mean that even when they are sinning that G-d should save His people and fulfill their requests
The greater the person - the greater is his desire for sin
Avnei Miluim144(Introduction): Our Sages say that whoever is greater his yetzer is greater. That is because there is no comparison of one who has bread in his basket to one who doesnt. When the spirit is closed in, it makes a greater effort to break through the restrictions and escape. Therefore one who holds to the path of Torah without letting his lust to express itself the yetzer harah does not have bread in his basket because it is highly unlikely for the person to do a really disgusting sin. Therefore his yetzer harah becomes stronger and the power of his lust which is being restrained is aroused to escape the restraints and act. It is different with a person who is not a tzadik since his yetzer harah has bread in its basket. Meaning the yetzer harah has the ability to influence through lust. Since the yetzer harah is not locked in, it doesnt make efforts to go out. This is what Tosfos (Kiddushin 31a) concerning that the one who is commanded has a greater yetzer. That the one who is not commanded to do the mitzva has bread in his basket because if he wants he can ignore the mitzva. However this picture changes over time. That is because it is well known that one who gets habituated to constant pleasure that it is no longer pleasing to have the same thing every day. Therefore the power of lust and its strategies change every day as is known that the way of drunkards is to search new ways to get pleasure Rav Tzadok145(Resisei Layla #3): According to the degree of perfection that a person has, there is a corresponding potential for imperfection. From the time of the sin of Adam, good and evil have become intertwined and there is a direct correspondence of one to the other. Whoever has a great imperfection has the means to acquire a great perfection - if he merits it. We see this in the words of the Zohar (3 216a) that in generation of the Flood - that was destroyed because of their sin they had the potential to be the ones to receive the Torah. Similarly Sukka (51a) states that proportional to ones greatness is his lust which is called foolishness Thus the greater the persons wisdom is also the greater is his potential for foolishness. Consequently, at the time when idol worship existed we find that prophecy also existed. Just as there were revelations of the light of prophecy to see spirituality with the eye there was a lust for other gods that were visible to the eye. Sifsei Cohen146(Shemos 1:1): Each man and his household came this teaches that a person should not travel to another country without his wife going with him. Just as we find that when Rav went to another country, he would ask who wanted to get married for the time that he would be living in that land. This was in order that he would not live without a wife and therefore Lilith would not get him (Yoma 18b). This is the reason that they decree that Tefilas Haderech should be said. It was in order that he would be married to the Shechina as it states in the Zohar (1:49b). And even though Rav would say Tefilas Haderech, he still would temporarily marry someone because whoever is greater than his fellow his yetzer is greater. Similarly Liliths main battle was with great people.
42
Daas Torah