Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
70's Area
80's Yield
90's
Production
The sluggish production in the rice growing states during the 1990s affected the growth performance adversely. On the whole, in the recent years, the productivity of rice increased marginally from 2.64 t / h a (rough rice) in 1991-93 to 3.02 t / h a in 2000-02, an annual growth of 1.33 percent (compound growth rate). This growth rate is, however, lower t h a n t h a t of the population growth. The question a r i s e s , w h e t h e r t h e deceleration in growth is t h e o u t c o m e of u s u a l production cycle, or the on-set of long term deceleration process? The weirdest aspect is that the disaggregated zonal analysis shows more s h a r p e r inter-regional p i c t u r e , b a r r i n g a few e x c e p t i o n s (see appendix table of compound growth rates). The growth r a t e s
25
were statistically significant. The production and productivity showing identically improved growth pattern, while rice area stagnating. In order to examine the inter-year dynamics, a series of 10-year moving growth rates were calculated for rice areas as well as production. The trend in 10 yearly moving average and growth of rice and production show that growth is sensitive to external factors such as annual weather conditions. The effect of inter-year variation which signifies annual weather condition that influences the growth rate (In Figs 4 and 5). Fig 4 : Trends in moving average and growth of rice area in India
44000 1.20
41000
38000 --
35000
310yrlyMA_A
65000
45000 -
25000 ! [ [ [ [ [ [ [ ! 1.00 1976- 1979- 1982- 1985- 1988- 1991- 1994- 199777 80 83 86 89 92 95 98
10yrlyMA_Q
26
Therefore, in order to achieve stable future growth, a strong R85D input is required to boost the productivity and break the yield barrier, which provide safety n e t a g a i n s t t h e a b e r r a t i o n s in climatic conditions. This is essential a s the productivity e n h a n c e m e n t is primarily technology and management dependent.
27