1997 Rules on Civil Procedure

Rule 21 Subpoena

Rule 21 SUBPOENA Section 1. Subpoena and subpoena duces tecum. Subpoena is a process directed to a person requiring him to attend and to testify at the hearing or the trial of an action, or at any investigation conducted by competent authority, or for the taking of his deposition. It may also require him to bring with him any books, documents, or other things under his control, in which case it is called a subpoena duces tecum. (1a, R23) Rule 21 applies to both civil and criminal cases. Q: What are the types of subpoena under the law? A: The following are the types of subpoena: 1.) Subpoena Ad Testificandum; and 2.) Subpoena Duces Tecum Now, the first one is commonly known as subpoena for short. So, when you say that refers to the first one. Q: Define Subpoena Ad Testificandum. A: SUBPOENA AD TESTIFICANDUM is a process directed to a person requiring him to attend and to testify at the hearing or trial of an action, or at any investigation conducted by competent authority, or for the taking of his deposition. So you are required to appear there and testify in court. Q: Define Subpoena Duces Tecum. A: SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM is a process directed to a person where it requires him to bring with him any books, documents or other things under his control. So, in other words we are more interested in his documents, which are in his custody. Whereas in ad testificandum, we are more interested in his oral testimony. Now, take note that a subpoena is a process which requires a witness to testify not only during the hearing or the trial of his case but also any investigation conducted by competent authority like quasi-judicial bodies such as the Labor Arbiter or the Senate Blue Ribbon Committee. Now, under Section 1, you may wonder what do you mean by subpoena for the taking of his deposition? That because that will clearer when we reach Rule 23. So we will just reserve talking deposition when we reach Rule 23. Sec. 2. By whom issued. The subpoena may be issued by: a) the court before whom the witness is required to attend; b) the court of the place where the deposition is to be taken; c) the officer or body authorized by law to do so in connection with investigations conducted by said officer or body; or d) any Justice of the Supreme Court or of the Court of Appeals in any case or investigation pending within the Philippines.

27

1997 Rules on Civil Procedure

Rule 21 Subpoena

When application for a subpoena to a prisoner is made, the judge or officer shall examine and study carefully such application to determine whether the same is made for a valid purpose. No prisoner sentenced to death, reclusion perpetua or life imprisonment and who is confined in any penal institution shall be brought outside the said penal institution for appearance or attendance in any court unless authorized by the Supreme Court. (2a, R23) Q: Who are authorized to issue subpoena? A: The following: 1. The court before whom the witness is required to attend the most common is the court where the court is pending; 2. The place where the deposition is to be taken we will discuss that when we reach Rule 23; 3. The officer or body authorized by law to do so in connection with investigations conducted by said officer or body Now, even administrative bodies or quasi-judicial officers are authorized to issue subpoena like the Labor Arbiter in connection with investigation conducted by said officer or body; 4. Any Justice of the Supreme Court or of the Court of Appeals in any case or investigation pending within the Philippines So, practically any justice can issue a subpoena to attend a particular case although it is not before the SC. They are empowered to issue a subpoena. Q: Can you subpoena a PRISONER to appear in court? A: YES, but the law says that the judge should be very careful to find out whether it is issued for a valid purpose because there is a risk. If a prisoner is going to be brought out in jail because he has to testify in a case, that might be an occasion for him to escape. So, the court should be very careful about that. The court should have to find out whether it is necessary. And take note, No person sentenced to death, reclusion perpetua, or life imprisonment and who is confined in a penal institution shall be brought outside the said penal institution for appearance or attendance in any court unless authorized by the Supreme Court. This is something new. I think this last paragraph is from the case of former Congressman Nicanor de Guzman of Nueva Ecija who was convicted of gun running. He was sentenced in Muntinlupa then one day, because of subpoena to testify in his hometown, he was escorted in his hometown to attend the fiesta and then I think he just used that as an excuse to attend the fiesta. And that was attacked by the media why was he allowed to leave the national penitentiary when he is sentenced to reclusion perpetua? So, this paragraph now appears. You cannot remove him from any National Penal institution without authority of the SC. Sec. 3. Form and contents. A subpoena shall state the name of the court and the title of the action or investigation, shall be directed to the person whose attendance is required, and in the case of a subpoena duces tecum, it shall also contain a reasonable description of the books,

28

1997 Rules on Civil Procedure

Rule 21 Subpoena

documents or things demanded which must appear to the court prima facie relevant. (3a, R23) Now, actually that is simple. You are required to testify on this date or time or you are required to bring with you the following documents, which was described in the subpoena duces tecum. Now, can a subpoena be quashed? To quash means to have it dissolved. What are the grounds to quash a subpoena? Section 4: Sec. 4. Quashing a subpoena. The court may quash a subpoena duces tecum upon motion promptly made and, in any event, at or before the time specified therein if it is unreasonable and oppressive, or the relevancy of the books, documents or things does not appear, or if the person in whose behalf the subpoena is issued fails to advance the reasonable cost of the production thereof. The court may quash a subpoena ad testificandum on the ground that the witness is not bound thereby. In either case, the subpoena may be quashed on the ground that the witness fees and kilometrage allowed by these Rules were not tendered when the subpoena was served. (4a, R23) GROUNDS TO QUASH SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM Q: What are the grounds for quashing a subpoena duces tecum? A: The following are the grounds: 1.) If the subpoena duces tecum is unreasonable and oppressive; 2.) The relevancy of the books, things or documents does not appear; 3.) the person in whose behalf the subpoena is issued fails to advance the reasonable cost for the production thereof. First Ground: IF THE SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM IS UNREASONABLE AND OPPRESSIVE Well, the best example is if it violates Section 3 it does not contain a reasonable description of the book, documents or things demanded. EXAMPLE: I will subpoena a business man to a business company, Mr. Manager you are required to bring to court all your ledgers, all your receipts, and all your documents from 1990 to the present. My golly! That would involve how many truck loads. Meaning, it would involve bringing to court thousand of documents. So, it becomes unreasonable and oppressive. The subpoena duces tecum should be more specific. Second Ground: THE RELEVANCY OF THE BOOKS OR DOCUMENTS DOES NOT APPEAR Meaning, there appears to be no connection between the documents which are being sought, and the issues in the case. Example, in a collection case, you were required to bring your birth certificate, marriage contract, etc. My golly! Anong pakialam ng mga niyan sa collection case?

29

1997 Rules on Civil Procedure

Rule 21 Subpoena

Third Ground: THE PERSON IN WHOSE BEHALF THE SUBPOENA IS ISSUED FAILS TO ADVANCE THE REASONABLE PRODUCTION THEREOF This is a very common situation: A bank received his subpoena duces tecum, Present to court the ledger of the return check of somebody. And this check was issued and send to you four years ago. Do you know the inconvenience when a company is asked to bring to court documents especially yung matagal na? Practically, the company has to assign the employee out of his usual job. He is pulled out from his usual job to look for these in the archives. Isa-isahin niya iyan. Maybe it will take him two or three days to locate and then he will be required to go to court where you will miss your work because you will be in court and yet the person who demand the subpoena duces tecum has never been bothered to pay service fee for that. Meaning, dapat magbayad siya reasonable cost. Of course, the law does not say how much. Sa gobyerno nga papirma ka lang diyan ng isang pirma bayad ka na ng service fee. How much more in the private sector, where you are requiring a company to look for a document? He is the one to look and then somebody will go to court. He will not be reporting for job and yet you have not even offered anything to the company. We experienced this many times subpoena duces tecum, and then the manager of the bank will say, do we have to comply with these? Well, you do not want to comply. Puwede man. When you received the subpoena duces tecum, may bayad ba? Did the person offer any amount for the trouble in looking for these documents and in going to court? Wala. Okay, we will move to quash. In other words, sometimes companies and banks just waived this. Sige lang, bayaan mo na. Maliit na bagay lang iyan. But it is a ground for quashing a subpoena. GROUND TO QUASH SUBPOENA AD TESTIFICANDUM Q: How do you quash a subpoena ad testificandum? A: The court may quash a subpoena ad testificandum on the ground that the witness is not bound thereby. Q: When is a witness not bound by a subpoena? A: The best answer is Section 10 of this rule if your residence is more than 100 kilometers from the place of trial. So, you cannot subpoena someone from Cebu to come to Davao because that is more than 100 kms. But suppose you are willing to pay for his transportation? Never mind, even if he is willing to pay the transportation. Pag ayaw niya, wala kang magagawa because it is more than 100 kms. In either case, whether subpoena duces tecum or ad testificandum, the last sentence says, You must also tender the witness fees and kilometrage allowed by this rules. Ano ba yang witness fees? I think thats Rule 141, yun bang pamasahe. There is a computation there. How much you have to pay the witness for his transportation and witness fees. That is different from the reasonable cost and reproduction in the first paragraph. So, these are the grounds for questioning a subpoena.

30

1997 Rules on Civil Procedure

Rule 21 Subpoena

Sec. 5. Subpoena for depositions. Proof of service of a notice to take a deposition, as provided in sections 15 and 25 of Rule 23, shall constitute sufficient authorization for the issuance of subpoenas for the persons named in said notice by the clerk of the court of the place in which the deposition is to be taken. The clerk shall not, however, issue a subpoena duces tecum to any such person without an order of the court. (5a, R23) Now, lets us skip Section 5 for the meantime because that is deposition. Sec. 6. Service. Service of a subpoena shall be made in the same manner as personal or substituted service of summons. The original shall be exhibited and a copy thereof delivered to the person on whom it is served, tendering to him the fees for one days attendance and the kilometrage allowed by these Rules, except that, when a subpoena is issued by or on behalf of the Republic of the Philippines or an officer or agency thereof, the tender need not be made. The service must be made so as to allow the witness a reasonable time for preparation and travel to the place of attendance. If the subpoena is duces tecum, the reasonable cost of producing the books, documents or things demanded shall also be tendered. (6a, R23) The first sentence says, Service of the subpoena shall be made in the same manner as personal or substituted service of summons. That is a new provision. So, the mode of service of summons, personal or substituted is also the manner of serving subpoena. So there is now a substituted service of summons. You can leave it to the wife. Under the old rule, it says there, the subpoena shall be served personally to the witness. There is no such thing as substituted service of subpoena because in most cases, when you subpoena somebody, you go to the house, the witness is not there but the wife is there. So sabihin mo, Ibigay mo na lang sa husband mo ito. That is substituted service of subpoena. You must serve it personally to the witness. There is no such thing as substituted service of subpoena Under the prior rule. But NOW, the rule has changed because Section 6 is very clear: It shall be made in the same manner as personal or substituted service of summons. Alright. And take note that You exhibit it to the witness. Then bayaran mo yong kanyang pamasahe. You must serve the subpoena with a reasonable time to me to allow him to travel. Its very unbecoming that the witness be serve a subpoena today and he is suppose to testify tomorrow. Suppose he has other commitments, bigyan mo siya ng time. And of course, as we discussed earlier, the reasonable cost of producing the books, documents or things demanded shall also be rendered. Sec. 7. Personal appearance in court. A person present in court before a judicial officer may be required to testify as if he were in attendance upon a subpoena issued by such court or officer. (10, R23) GENERAL RULE: You can be compelled to testify if you have not been serve with a subpoena.

31

1997 Rules on Civil Procedure

Rule 21 Subpoena

EXCEPTION: Section 7 a person present in court before a judicial officer maybe required to testify as if he is under subpoena. EXAMPLE: During the trial, Mr. Pogi is there. Gusto niyang makinig eh. Audience lang siya. And then the lawyer will say, Our first witness is Mr. Pogi. Sabi niya Uy, uy, wala koy labot diri. I was not under subpoena. NO, You can be compelled because you are present in court. Any person present inside the courtroom can be compelled to testify as if he is under subpoena. So, if Mr. Pogi believes he will be called and ayaw niya, huwag siyang sumipot sa court. Huwag kang magtingin-tingin doon. It happened several times. There was an instance I wanted to call a witness several times to surprise him. If I will have him subpoena, baka makabantay. Alam din niya. And then Ill talk to him. O punta ka bukas ha? Sigurado ha. In other words, Ill have to trick him into going into courtroom and then once inside, my first witness is that guy. Wala kang magawa. Because any person present in court can be compelled to testify because if I will have him subpoena, he will be forewarn. So I do not want to forewarn him. FAILURE TO APPEAR; CONSEQUENCES Q: How do you compel a witness to attend? Meaning, a witness was subpoena and he did not show up. What are the consequences of defying a subpoena? A: The consequences are found in Sections 8 and 9. Sec. 8. Compelling attendance. In case of failure of a witness to attend, the court or judge issuing the subpoena, upon proof of the service thereof and of the failure of the witness, may issue a warrant to the sheriff of the province, or his deputy, to arrest the witness and bring him before the court or officer where his attendance is required, and the cost of such warrant and seizure of such witness shall be paid by the witness if the court issuing it shall determine that his failure to answer the subpoena was willful and without just excuse. (11, R23) Sec. 9. Contempt. Failure by any person without adequate cause to obey a subpoena served upon him shall be deemed a contempt of the court from which the subpoena is issued. If the subpoena was not issued by a court, the disobedience thereto shall be punished in accordance with the applicable law or Rule. (12a, R23) Q: What are the consequences if the witness refuses to appear after he was subpoenaed> A: The following: 1.) You can ask the court to issue a warrant for his arrest. (Section 8) Parang criminal ba. Thats what you call a warrant to arrest a recalcitrant witness. You move to arrest the witness para puwersahin mo ba; 2.) Declare him in contempt of court for failure to obey the subpoena (Section 9) ENFORCEABILITY OF SUBPOENA

32

1997 Rules on Civil Procedure

Rule 21 Subpoena

Sec. 10. Exceptions. The provisions of sections 8 and 9 of this Rule shall not apply to a witness who resides more than one hundred (100) kilometers from his residence to the place where he is to testify by the ordinary course of travel, or to a detention prisoner if no permission of the court in which his case is pending was obtained. (9a, R23) Q: When is a witness not bound by a subpoena? A: When his place of residence is more than 100 kms. to the place of trial. Actually, the old rule is 50 kms. lang. Now, the new rule is double na more than 100kms. So pag sobra ng 100 kms, you cannot compel the witness anymore to appear. Alright, clear so far? Although, this 100-km distance does not apply if it is a criminal case where the accused would like to seek the compulsory process issued to secure the attendance of witnesses in his behalf because that is a superior right. That is how the SC interpreted it in the case of PEOPLE vs. MONTEJO (21 SCRA 722 [1965]), reiterated in GENORGA vs. QUITAIN (78 SCRA 94) that the 50-km (now 100-km) limitation applies only to civil cases, but not to criminal cases, especially if the person to be subpoenaed is a defense witness because of the constitutional right of the accused which is a right which cannot be curtailed by the Rules of Court. SUMMONS vs. SUBPOENA Now, Ive noticed among laymen that there is a confusion between a summons and a subpoena. Ive tried noticing that for years. The client will say, Nakatanggap ako ng subpoena. Pagtingin mo summon man under Rule 14. Sometimes, he will say, Gi-summon ako ng court. Iyon pala, subpoena. In other words among laymen, they think summon and subpoena are the same but actually we know that they are not. Summons is in Rule 14 and one good question is, distinguish summon from subpoena. I notice that there is no author has ever bothered to explain at least to outline an answer in his book. Ive gone to many books in remedial law, I still have to see an author who says in his commentaries, summons and subpoena are two different things and these are the distinctions? Now, suppose that will be asked in the bar, do not be afraid simply because you have not read it in the book. If you know an idea, a legal concept summons, alam naman ninyo yan; subpoena actually you can answer. You do not have to rely to any author in answering the question. As a matter of fact, I remember when I was taking the BAR, I never bother to read the distinction of any author. Why? Because how can I memorized all of these distinctions in all subject? Impossible no? Its impossible for me to memorize everything that the author said about distinctions and I dont have to rely on any book. Thats the best. Now, yong mga author, they only try to make your job easier by outlining the distinctions between this and that. But suppose there will be a question where you are asked to differentiate this from that and you have not read that in any book, mag-panic ka? Huwag kang mag-panic. In other words, once you know the concept, you can easily give an answer. Alright, there should be no confusion between a subpoena and a summons. There are 2 different processes, although laymen would tend to equate one with the other.

33

1997 Rules on Civil Procedure

Rule 21 Subpoena

Q: Distinguish SUBPOENA from SUMMONS. A: The following are the distinctions: 1.) SUBPOENA is directed to a witness; whereas SUMMONS is directed to a defendant in a civil case; 2.) In SUBPOENA, the witness is directed to appear in court or to bring documents; whereas In SUMMONS, the defendant is informed that a complaint is filed against him and he must file a responsive pleading within the period otherwise, judgment can be rendered; 3.) In SUBPOENA, the witness will be declared in contempt or his attendance can be compelled by the issuance of a warrant for his arrest; whereas In SUMMONS, a judgment in default will be rendered against the defendant who fails to comply. 4.) SUBPOENA applicable to both criminal and civil case; whereas SUMMONS applies only to civil cases. 5.) In SUBPOENA, there is a 100-km limitation of its enforceability; whereas In SUMMONS, there is no distance limitation.

34