Pesit Ise Sar Nba 2011

P E S Institute of Technology
Department of Information Science & Engineering
2011
Self Assessment Report (SAR) for NBA Accreditation

of Undergraduate Program in Information Science & Engineering
PES INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

100 Feet Ring Road, Banashankari III Stage,
BANGALORE-560085
National Board of Accreditation

New Delhi, India
January, 2011
Ver. June 2009 NBA Accreditation of UG Engineering Program Page 1 of 193 pages
2011
INDEX SHEET
SL NO. 1. 2. 3. Declaration PART I - INSTITUTIONAL SUMMARY (Criteria I and II) PART II - Department / Programme Summary (Criteria III to VIII) PART III - Curriculum, Syllabi, PEOS and Outcomes Annexure 1 Latest NBA Accreditation Copy Annexure 2 Professional Activities Detail Annexure 3 List of Five Best and Average Projects Annexure 4 Faculty Details Annexure 5 Faculty Publication Details Annexure 6 Faculty R & D and Consultancy Details Annexure 7 Facilities and Technical Support Details Annexure 8 Continuing Education and New Facility Details Annexure 9 Overall Improvements Details Annexure 10 Curriculum Details Annexure 11 List all the course modules Annexure 12 Course objectives and mapping Annexure 13 Faculty Expertise Details Annexure 14 Calendar of Events CONTENTS PAGE NO. 3 4 to 87 88 to 110
4.
111
Ver. June 2009
NBA Accreditation of UG Engineering Program
Page 2 of 193 pages
2011
DECLARATION
This Self Assessment Report (SAR) is prepared for Current Academic Year 20112012 and Current Financial Year 2010-2011 on behalf of us by the team headed by the Principal/Director/Vice Chancellor of the Institution. I certify that the information provided in this SAR is extracted from the records and to the best of our knowledge, is correct and complete
I understand that any false statement/information of consequence may lead to the rejection of the application for accreditation for a period of two or more years. I also understand that the National Board of Accreditation (NBA) or its subcommittee will have the right to decide on the basis of the submitted SAR whether the Institution should be considered for an accreditation visit.
If the information of consequence was found to be wrong during the visit or subsequent to grant of accreditation, NBA has right to withdraw the accreditation granted, if any, and no accreditation will be allowed for a period of two years or more.
Name, Designation and Seal of the Chairman Governing Council of the Institute with signature
Place: Bangalore Date:
Ver. June 2009
Page 3 of 193 pages
2011
Evaluators Space
PART I INSTITUTIONAL SUMMARY (Criteria I and II)
I.0.1. College/ Institution/University Name and Address: PES Institute of Technology, 100 Feet Ring Road, Banashankari III Stage, Bangalore-560085. I.0.2. Name, designation, telephone numbers and e-mail id of the contact person for NBA: Dr.K.N.Balasubramanya Murthy, Principal & Director Ph:(080)26724781, 82, 83, Fax:(080)26720886 principal@pes.edu I.0.3. History of the College / Institution (including dates of introduction and no. of seats of various program of study along with NBA accreditation, if any), in tabular form: Established in 1988 as the first engineering college under the Peoples Education Society, PES Institute of Technology [PESIT] is a premier institution with a vision to create a professionally superior and ethically strong global manpower. PESIT today is a brand by itself, providing the best quality education and is one of the most sought after names among students and parents in the country. PESIT has been consistently getting high order results and university ranks. Carrying on its mission of reaching out education to a much larger number of students and committed to an exemplary degree of social obligation, PESIT has initiated several programs such as free engineering education to the rural Kannada medium students, Community Development Program (CDP), adoption of government schools, providing them with furniture and many other facilities, environment-protection through adoption of public parks, Shiksha Kalpa a forum that extends financial assistance to the needy students. PESIT has been upward of 90% level in exam results with a huge number of students earning Distinctions (>=70%). A special ceremony is organized during every semester to honour the meritorious students. In line with its commitment to help the needy students, PESIT issues Scholarships
2011
Evaluators Space
cheques ensuring free engineering education for 10 needy students with rural background. Under Graduate Courses: Intake Fixed Sl. No. Course by Government 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mechanical Engineering Electronics and Communication Engineering Computer Science &Engineering Information Science& Engineering Telecommunication Engineering Biotechnology Electrical and Electronics Engineering Total Post Graduate Courses: Intake Fixed Sl. No Course by Government 1. 2. Master of Business Administration Master of Computer Applications M. Tech 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Manufacturing Science &Engineering VLSI Design& Embedded Systems Computer Network Engineering Digital Electronics& Communication Systems Automotive Engineering Software Engineering Bioinformatics 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 2006 2006 2006 2007 2008 2010 2010
Page 5 of 193 pages
Year of Establishment 1988 1988 1988 1998 1999 2002 2006
120 120 120 120 120 120 120 840
Year of Establishment 1997 1997
180 120
Ver. June 2009
2011
Evaluators Space
I.0.4. Ownership Status: Govt. (Central/State) / Trust / Society (Govt. / NGO / Private) / Private/ Other (specify) Society (Private)
I.0.5. Financial Status: Govt.(Central/State) / Grants-in-aid / Not-for-profit / Private-Self financing / Other(specify) Private-Self financing
I.0.6. Nature of Trust / Society: Registered Public Society
List other Institutes/colleges run by the Trust/Society INSTITUTIONS IN PES GROUP # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Institution PES College of Science & Commerce ....................................... PES Institute of Pharmacy ......................................................... PES Polytechnic ........................................................................ PES College of Pharmacy .......................................................... PES Institute of Technology ...................................................... PES College of Business Management ...................................... PES Institute of Hotel Management ........................................... PES Institute of Technology- MBA ........................................... PES Institute of Technology- MCA ........................................... PES Institute of Medical Science & Research ............................ PES College of Education .......................................................... PES School of Engineering ........................................................ Established in 1973 1982 1983 1986 1988 1994 1994 1997 1997 2002 2004 2005
Ver. June 2009
Page 6 of 193 pages
2011 Evaluators Space
I.0.7. External Sources of Funds: Name of the External Source NA CFY 2010-11 -CFY m1 2009-10 --CFY m2 2008-09 ---
I.0.8. Internally Acquired Funds: ( In Lakhs of Rs. ) CFY (Budgeted) 2010-11 2600 260 CFY m1 2009-10 2504 261 CFY m2 2008-09 2399 176
Name of the Internal Source Students Fee Others
I.0.9. Scholarships or any financial assistance provided to students? YES if provided, basis of scholarship/assistance : Merit/Parents limited income/other # Assistance[MRD merit scholarships] 310 Amount 15.50 L in CFY Others [Free education] 19 Amount 4.05 L
# Assistance[MRD merit scholarships] 98 Amount 4.90 L in CFY minus 1 Others [Free education] 23 Amount 4.65 L
# Assistance[MRD merit scholarships] 238 Amount 11.90 L in CFY minus 2 Others [Free education] 21 Amount 5.20 L
I.0.10. Basis/examination for admission to the engineering college: All India entrance / State level entrance / University entrance / 12 th level / other (specify) CET/COMED-K/AIEEE/JEE.
Boys I.0.11. Total No. of Engineering 866 + 444 Students Total No. of Other Students, if any I.0.12. Total No. of Employees 544 NA Girls
606 + 311 260 + 133
Boys NA Girls NA
Male 345
Female 199
Ver. June 2009
Page 7 of 193 pages
I.0.13. Minimum and maximum number of faculty and staff on roll, in the Engineering College/Institute/Faculty, during the CAY and the previous CAYs (1st July to 30th June): Item CAY 2010-11 Min Max 165 196 CAY minus 1 2009-10 Min Max 161 181 Cay minus 2 2008-09 Min Max 147 174
Teaching faculty in the Department Teaching faculty in Science & Humanities Non-teaching staff
26
31
26
27
24
27
228
241
200
230
196
241
Criterion I: Organization & Governance, Resources, Institutional Support, Development & Planning I-I.1 Campus infrastructure and
facility (30)
I-I.1.1
Land,
built
up
area
and
academic
infrastructure (5) Physical resources
available A. Exclusive for this college B. Shared with other colleges in this campus, if any -0Land acres Built up floor space -0sqm Land 11.50 acres Built up floor space 57107 sqm
I-I.1.2 Maintenance of academic infrastructure and facilities (5) Distinct Features: Maintenance cell is in place to take care of civil, electrical and furniture routine check-ups and repairs. Schedule of routine inspection and check-ups is prepared.
Central complaint register is maintained [Problem Change Management System]. Minor repairs are carried out by in-house staff. Electrical Staff: 05 Workshop Staff: 06 Plumber: 04
Major repairs are outsourced. Maintenance cell meets once a month to take review and discuss any major problems. Routine cleaning of premises including toilet blocks by contract labors. Routine cleaning of water tanks, coolers and filters is carried out as per schedule.
I-I.1.3 Ambience, green cover, water harvesting, environment preservation etc. (5) Distinct Features: Ambience: Academic ambience is enhanced by modern furniture, improved infrastructure & state of the art facilities in classrooms and laboratories. Dress code for students. Library and laboratory facility is made available after college hours and on holidays. Internet facility is available 24 hrs with Wi-Fi points. Study room facility with power back-up is available round the clock during examination period.
Green cover: Green cover within institute is enhanced by arranging tree plantations on various occasions like birthdays and national festivals No. of Trees in the college campus: 125 No. of Shrubs: 200 Number of species in campus: 82
Water harvesting: Ground water collection and diversion towards soak pits. Organization of awareness program on water harvesting for students.
2011
Evaluators Space
Environment preservation: Gardeners under supervision of experienced Garden supervisor are in place for taking care of plants. Sufficient water is made available through bore well and separate water supply scheme. Segregated solid waste management system is in place. Waste papers are supplied to proper agencies for recycling. Solar water heating system is installed in the student hostels.
I-I.1.4 Hostel (Boys and girls) (5) Hostel for Boys Yes Exclusive/Shared/Rented - Exclusive # of accommodated students 1010 # in waiting Nil
# of Rooms 485
Hostel for Girls? Yes # of Rooms 216 Hostel Rooms Girls 4/Room Girls 3/Room Girls 2/Room Girls 1/Room Boys 3/Room Boys 3/Room Boys 2/Room Boys 2/Room Boys 1/Room
Exclusive/Shared/Rented# of accommodated students 447 Carpet Area/Room 26.82 22.76 14.05 6.5 28 42.27 15.61 12.85 7.58
Rented # in waiting Nil
Number of Rooms 29 117 34 36 153 40 81 39 172
Ver. June 2009
Page 10 of 193 pages
2011
Evaluators Space
I-I.1.5 Transportation facility and canteen (5)
Transport
Yes
Exclusive/State-transport - Exclusive Facility availed by Students and staff
# of Buses 11
Canteen
Yes Sitting space 432 sq.m Daily Usage 432 sq.m
# of Canteens 3
I-I.1.6 Electricity, power backup, telecom, water etc (5) (Specific details in respect of installed capacity, service points for distribution, water purification etc.)
Electricity: Electric supply of 440 Volt, 3Phase, AC is available with 04 connections from KPTCL Total Sanctioned Load: 900 KVA Distribution Separate feeder for each department and hostel
Power back-up: Stand-by supply: 04 DG sets are used DG Set Capacity: 40 KVA and 15 KVA, Total:55 KVA Power back-up through UPS for computer systems
Telecom: EPABX system is installed to provide intercom connection to each faculty. BSNL telephone connections: 10 Fax: 02 External calls can be diverted to individual faculty through EPABX. Internet access in faculty cabins/Labs/Class rooms/WiFi in all buildings.
Evaluators Space Page 11 of 193 pages
Source of water supply to campus: 05 bore wells in campus

Ver. June 2009 NBA Accreditation of UG Engineering Program
2011
Water supply scheme from BWSSB Drinking water mineral water dispensers in all the building is provided [Outsourced]. Water storage facilities: Overhead and Underground: Total Capacity: > 1.5 lakhs Liters
I-I.2 Organization, governance and transparency (20)
Governance is the key activity that connects between the management, staff, students and the community. We believe it should be effective, efficient and economical in execution of its duties. We support modern governance and proper administration and believe these should be carried out in a way that actively acknowledges diversity, that is respectful of identity and serious belief and that reflects balance. PESIT has a governing body in place wherein the members are drawn from distinguished cross-sections of the society as shown in Table below.
Ver. June 2009
GOVERNING BODY MEMBERS Name of the Member with Address Prof M R Doreswamy Founder Secretary, 1. PES Group of Institutions Bangalore Prof D Jawahar Chief Executive Officer, 2. PES Institute of Technology, Bangalore Prof Ajoy Kumar Chief Operating Officer, 3. PES Institute of Technology, Bangalore Sri Ashok K Dogra Financial Adviser, 4. University Grants Commission, New Delhi. Prof H U Talawar 5. Director of Technical Education Government of Karnataka Dr K G Rangaraju Former Deputy Director, IIT-R, 6. 102, Rajalakshmi Apts, 24th Main, VI Phase, J P Nagar, Bangalore 560 078 Regional Officer AICTE, SW RO 7. Bangalore University Campus P K Block, Palace Road, Bangalore 560 009 Prof J Surya Prasad Principal & Director, 8. PES School of Engineering Bangalore Prof M V Satyanarayana Director, 9. PES Degree College Hanumanthnagar, Bangalore Prof T R Seetharam Department of Mechanical 10. Engineering, PES Institute of Technology, Bangalore # Profession Educationist, Social Worker, MLC, Government of Karnataka Designation
Chairman
Chief Executive Officer PES Institutions Chief Operating Officer PES Institutions
Member
Member
Financial Adviser UGC
UGC Nominee
State Govt. Nominee
Member
Former Deputy Director IIT-R
VTU Nominee
Regional Officer AICTE
Member
Principal & Director PES School of Engineering
Member
Director PES Degree College.
Member
Chair Professor- Thermal Engineering
Member
Ver. June 2009
2011
Evaluators Space
Name of the Member with Address Dr K S Sridhar Department of Mechanical 11 Engineering, PES Institute of Technology, Bangalore Dr V Shyam Director-Technology, Philips 12. Health Care Innovation Campus Manyatha Tech Park Nagavara, Bangalore 560 045 Dr K N Balasubramanya Murthy Principal & Director 13. PES Institute of Technology Bangalore 560 085 #
Profession Dean (Training Placement) PESIT &
Designation
Member
Director-Philips
Member
Principal & Director PES Institute of Technology
Member Secretary
I-I.2.1 Governing body, administrative setup and functions of various bodies (5) (List Governing, Senate and all other Academic and Administrative bodies, their memberships, functions and responsibilities, relation of the members of the members of such bodies with the principal owner of the college/institute, frequency of the meetings and attendance therein, in tabular form. A few sampler minutes of the meetings and action taken reports should be annexed.)
We at PESIT believe in totally different kind of work culture. Basically it aims at love and affection to each and every stake-holder of the institute. Being certified by ISO 9001:2000, PESIT follows the complete ISO terminology to the fullest extent in its dayto-day life. In particular the concept of process owners, which facilitates a perfect decentralization of activities and delegation of authorities, has proven itself to be a key concept in the success achieved by the institute on different counts. The working methodology basically focuses on student, which is the dearest and least responsible element of the system. Involvement of each and everyone in the decision-making and the transparency associated therein also form the important features of the work culture. The institute functions with perfect decentralized administration as depicted in Figure 1 that has complete transparency in the decision making process. Institute follows the concept of process owners as emerged from the ISO terminology.
2011
Evaluators Space
Figure 1. Organizational Chart
Ver. June 2009
2011
Evaluators Space
I-I.2.2 Defined rules, procedures, recruitment and promotional policies etc (5) (List of the published rules, policies and procedures, year of publications, awareness among the employees/students, availability on web etc.) Functions of Key Administrative Positions: The functions of various key positions are depicted in Table below. PLANNING AND EVALUATION COMMITTEE 1 2 3 Prof.D.Jawahar Dr. K.N.Balasubramanya Murthy Prof. Ajoy Kumar Chief Executive Officer Principal and Director Chief Operating Officer & Member - Governing Body 4 Dr. Kavi Mahesh Professor, Department of Member Computer Engineering 5 Dr. Koshy George Professor , Department of Telecommunication Convener Science & Chairman Member Member
Engineering Goal: The purpose of Planning and Evaluation Committee is to plan and evaluate programs and services and to make recommendations accordingly to the Governing Body of the institute (PESIT). Plan Fiscal and Budget and Policy and to strengthen collaboration and a shared vision between the Institute and the Department, as both work to implement a system to improve and support quality Institute-wide and to offer an array of high quality, comprehensive, and affordable programs designed to meet the diverse and individual needs. Activities: activities may include but are not limited to1. 2. 3. 4. Review the Plan of Service and the Bye-Laws and other policies regularly; Review MOUs Review the annual budget and make recommendation to Governing Council; Develop and suggest new programs and services and submit such ideas and suggestions to the Governing Council; 5. Evaluate programs and services;
NBA Accreditation of UG Engineering Program Page 16 of 193 pages
Ver. June 2009
2011
Evaluators Space
6. 7.
Address such other issues as from time to time may be referred to the committee; Recommend a plan of action based on the recommendations of the college
advisory board. Roles and Responsibilities of Planning and Evaluation Committee: 1. Reviews contractual, legal and or operational issues with the Chief Executive Officer (CEO). 2. Serves as a sounding board for new programs, policies, or initiatives that may come before Advisory Board, as may be determined by the P&E. 3. Monitors the implementation of the Institutes multi-year Strategic Plan. 4. The P&E generally meets four times in a year duration GRIEVANCE APPEAL COMMITTEE 1 Dr. K.N.Balasubramanya Murthy Principal Director 2 Dr. R.V.Iyer Assistant Professor Convener Physics 3 Prof.Ajoy Kumar Chief Operating Member and Chairman
Officer & Member Governing Body 4 Mr. Sharanabasappa S Patil Professor, Mechanical Engineering 5 Dr.Keshavan.B.K HOD Electrical Member & Member
Engineering Dean-Evaluation
Goal: The Grievance Appeal Committee shall be responsible for collective agreement dealing with grievances. Activities: PESIT is committed to providing a harmonious, fair and just learning environment by ensuring that students and staff have access to processes that allow for appeals, complaints and grievances to be resolved.
Ver. June 2009
2011
Evaluators Space
Student and staff grievance resolution processes seek to facilitate the informal resolution of grievances as close as possible to the source of student dissatisfaction, though there will be instances when either students may choose to lodge a formal appeal or a grievance needs to go to a higher authority for resolution. PESIT approach to student grievance resolution emphasizes: Fairness and impartiality The handling of grievances informally where possible The principles of natural justice and procedural fairness Effective, reciprocal communication and feedback Resolution of grievances as early as possible and as close as possible to the source of dissatisfaction. Role and Responsibilities of the Grievance Appeal Committee (GAC) 1. Student Appeals Committee shall hear complaints and appeals arising from the policies on: Evaluation and assessment Academic programs Student progress Appeals arising from higher degree research studies. Student admission Breaches of academic integrity Problems arising in the context of their association with the institute, including those involving faculty misconduct in an instructional setting Administrative operations or decisions relating to academic matters. Other policies, not listed above, which provide for scope to the Grievance Appeals Committee. 2. Jurisdiction: The committee is charged with hearing those student grievances related to faculty misconduct in the performance of his or her duties in an instructional setting. It should be understood, however, that certain cases do not fall under the jurisdiction GAC, but are subject to special investigatory procedures: cases involving sexual harassment or sexual misconduct; cases involving discrimination on the basis of race, color, age, national origin, religion,
2011
Evaluators Space
gender, sexual orientation, disability, or any other protected status; and cases involving allegations of fraud or plagiarism in research. 3. The grievance once received, the convener shall be responsible for the distribution of a copy of the grievance to the other members of the Grievance Appeal Committee. 4. Investigating a Potential Grievance: The duty of GAC is to provide fair
representation for all of its members. The Committee Member appointed to investigate a potential grievance shall investigate the grievance and report the results of the investigation to the Grievance Committee, along with a recommendation. At all stages in the handing of a potential grievance, the Grievance Committee and members undertake to maintain a policy of confidentiality and assess the grievance fairly, without discrimination, and in a non arbitrary fashion. Depending on the circumstances and seriousness of the grievance, the investigation shall include: (i) At least one meeting with the aggrieved member to determine all relevant facts and secure all relevant documentation. The investigating Grievance Committee member shall interview or attempt to interview any relevant witnesses to the facts of the grievance. (ii) During the course of the investigation, the investigator will maintain careful notes of interviews with the aggrieved member and relevant witnesses. (iii) Fostering intellectual inquiry in a climate of academic freedom and integrity. Its members, students and faculty alike, are expected to uphold these principles and exhibit tolerance and respect for others. (iv) In addition to the written statements and testimony of the student and the faculty member, the Committee may collect and consider any information it deems relevant and hear from anyone it deems to have relevant information. Both the student and faculty member may suggest the names of persons with relevant information, but the Committee makes the final decision about whom to interview. (v) The proceedings and the Committee's deliberations shall be confidential and not open to the public.
2011
Evaluators Space
5.
Timeframe for Committee Proceedings, Its Report and the Decision: The Committee shall make every effort to address requests for reviews during the monthly meeting after they have been submitted and to inform students of its decision within 10 working days thereafter. (the Committee meets only once monthly.)
Grievance Officer Fact Sheet A. Who is complaining or grieving? a. Name b. Department c. Phone d. E-Mail e. Faculty f. Home address and telephone g. Name of Dean and Chairperson B. What is the Complaint or Grievance C. Dates of Event or Acts of Omission
D. Place of Event
E. List of all interviews with date and times. Notes from all interviews will become part of the official file.
F. List of all relevant documentation in the official file of the complaint/grievance
Signature of the Grievance Committee Member Signature of the Griever Date Recommendation to GAC Grievance Accepted or not by GAC
Ver. June 2009
2011
Evaluators Space
EXAMINATION COMMITTEE 1 2 3 4 5 Prof.D.Jawahar Dr. K.N.Balasubramanya Murthy Prof. Nitin V.Pujari Dr. J. Suryaprasad Prof. V.Krishnamurthy Chief Executive Officer Principal and Director Dean Continuing Education Member of Governing Body Dean-Academic affairs Chairman Member Member Member Convener
Goal: Planning, conducting examination events and management of evaluation and result declaration Activities: Ensuring syllabus coverage with respect to time according to course information Planning and conducting exam events (CIE, SEE, Project Presentation evaluation, etc.) Ratifying Board of examiners (internal and external) Monitoring the question paper setting process, evaluation process, tabulation and grade deduction including result declaration processes. Ratifying I and X Grades, semester-wise Providing guidelines to cut-off points, bands to facilitate calculation of grades
Redress appeals related to results and grades Statistical analysis of results Framing and prescription of performance evaluation policy Ratification of decisions of IMPRC Ensuring communication of definitions, amendments and updates to students and faculty, exam relating to mattes well in-time. Ensuring minimal deviations/departures from laid out procedures with respect to duties of all personnel involved in exam duties Convener to conduct a minimum of 4 meetings per semester for
appraisals/ratifications/discussion of exam policy matters
Ver. June 2009
2011
Evaluators Space
Role and Responsibilities of Exam Committee The specific roles and responsibilities related to assessment presented below are complementary to those outlined in the Regulations to conduct Academic Courses of PESIT. The examination committee will be responsible to monitor and conduct surveillance with respect to plan and conduct of examinations (CIE and SEE events, inclusive of theory and laboratory practice as prescribed by the curriculum and syllabus committee). The system being autonomous program, the examination committee will have a comprehensive responsibility of direct and indirect examination, performance and monitoring duties. Therefore the role and responsibility of the examination committee is delineated pertaining to Students, Chief Course Instructors (Senior teacher nominated among the teachers of the department), Course Instructors (Lecturers), HODs, Deans (Dean, E; Dean, AA). Students The responsibility of exam committee, by methods it deems fit from time to time; will ensure that students are made to: 1. Engage actively in the learning process and participate according to unit and assessment requirements; 2. Complete assessment tasks diligently and honestly to provide evidence through performance tests of learning achievements in a course at several defined parts during semester 3. Meet assessment requirements as specified in the unit outline, including submission of work by the due date; 4. Discuss any concerns students have regarding their progress in coursework and assessment as early as possible with relevant lecturers and/or the Chief Course Instructor, Faculty Adviser, 5. Consult with the CCI (in the first instance) and Course CI, or with the HOD as early as possible, if personal circumstances are affecting participation or performance in assessment exam event, lab. practice sessions, promptly, rather than wait until the final grade is awarded in the course;
Ver. June 2009
2011
Evaluators Space
6. Check that their name is on the course list after classes commence and if not, to contact the FA and/or their CCI. 7. In the case of late enrolment, it is the responsibility of the student to obtain the Course Information from the CCI in the first week of attendance in the Course; 8. Access and abide by all policies, procedures and regulations relating to assessment and seek clarification, where necessary.
Chief Course Instructor (CCI) It is the responsibility of CCI (in consultation with other relevant teachers/staff as appropriate) to: 1. Design and specify the number and type of assessment tasks and their weightings; 2. Prepare the unit outline in accordance with the procedures (refer to Regulations) and provide an electronic copy to the Dean (E) Office prior to the start of the study period; 3. Make the unit outline available electronically to all students enrolled in the course during the first week of the study period of the semester;
4. Be available for student consultation on a regular basis, informing students of their availability indicating the place and time for consultations (both with and without appointment; 5. In exceptional circumstances, where the need arises, seek approval of the HOD to change assessment tasks or criteria for a unit after the first week of the study period under intimation to Office of Dean (E). Such changes should not result in disadvantage to any student and all students must be advised, in writing, of approved change; 6. Submit examination requests, if required, by the due date and prepare and submit the examination paper(s) for central examinations by the due date; 7. Prepare and arrange the conduct of all School-based assessment tasks for the course and alternative/additional assessment tasks, as required; 8. Give consideration to and approve, if appropriate, applications for consideration of personal circumstances affecting assessment, and forward applications to HOD;
Ver. June 2009
2011
Evaluators Space
9. Liaise with the CI, as required, with regard to applications for consideration of personal circumstances affecting assessment; 10. Provide appropriate guidelines to CI (lecturers) regarding marks allotment, on assessment criteria, marking procedures, moderation and methods for calculating final results; 11. Maintain and collate records of each students marks for all assessment components in accordance with the pre-decided evaluation norms . Obtain and secure record of each students results, both electronically and in hard copy from Office of Dean (E), must be kept for at least one standard study period after the release of final results (one full year/two semesters after the SEE event; 12. Where appropriate, eg for large classes, provide students with timely feedback on the distribution of marks or grades for a given exam event / assessment task; 13. If requested, provide clarification to students about a result for an assessment task or grade in a course; 14. Communicate effectively with all teaching staff, HOD and Office of Dean(E) and/or marking in a course to ensure quality of practice;
Course Instructors (Lecturers) 1. It is the responsibility of lecturers to: 2. Participate in the Conduct and evaluation of CIE and SEE events of students; 3. Liaise with the CCI to ensure that evaluation practices are conducted in a consistent and coherent manner; 4. Be available for student consultation on a regular basis, informing students of their availability for student consultations (both with and without appointments); 5. Advise the CCI within a reasonable time of student progress and how effectively students are learning; 6. Keep a secure record of each students results, both electronically and in hard copy, 7. Provide data relating to results in assessment tasks/exam events and attendance, if required, to the CCI.
Ver. June 2009
2011
Evaluators Space
Faculty Advisers It is the responsibility of FA to: 1. Give consideration to and approve, if appropriate, applications for consideration of personal circumstances affecting evaluation and liaise with relevant staff, as required; ii. Have a copy of enrollment forms and courses with respect to students assigned and advise course registration process and discuss course content and level of difficulty of the course 2. Overview students progress and provide academic advice based on evaluation assessment outcomes and, if necessary, consider submissions from students to show cause why enrolment (course registration) should not be terminated; 3. Monitor the interim and final performance of students assigned and liaise with parents, if required. HODs It is the responsibility of Heads of Department to: 1. Oversee all the courses offered by that department; 2. Appoint CCIs for each course offered and administered by their department; 3. Evaluate and approve requests from CCIs to change assessment tasks or criteria for a course after the first week of the study period. Such changes should be made only in exceptional circumstances and not disadvantage any student; 4. Ensure that Course Information sheets publication and distribution to students; 5. Ensure that examination question papers are reviewed and accurate prior to submission, and are submitted by the relevant due date to designated official of Office of Dean(E); 6. Give consideration to and approve, if appropriate, applications for consideration of personal circumstances affecting assessment and liaise with relevant staff, as required 7. HOD may nominate another staff member in the department to ratify grades deduced by Dean (E) Office; are reviewed and accurate prior to
Ver. June 2009
2011
Evaluators Space
8. Recommend and substantial with records students deserving X and I grades in exceptional circumstances; 9. Review the performance of students undertaking courses offered by the Department, paying particular attention to results that are borderline between grades; 10. Monitor the appropriateness of allocation of grades in accordance with the Academic Regulations and the effectiveness of evaluation assessment practices in courses administered by the department (with advice from the Dean AA); 11. Ensure all ratified grades are submitted by the due date; 12. Consider reports from CCIs about alleged breaches of academic honesty (malpractice) and determine in line with the Institute Malpractice Review Committee; Ensure that institutes quality assurance processes for evaluation, such as moderation of assessment in courses, are followed; 13. Ensure the Institute Evaluation Assessment Policy and Procedures and Academic Regulations are implemented; 14. Consider requests for review of termination of a students enrolment; 15. Oversee the status of unallocated final result grades and ensure their timely conversion to final grades coordinating with office of Dean (E).
Evaluation Review Committees An Evaluation Review Committee will be established by a Head of Department to review evaluation assessment outcomes for the department. The role and responsibilities of the Assessment Review Committee will be specified by the Head of department at the time of its establishment and should be reviewed annually. Responsibilities so delegated by the Head may include the following: i. Review the performance of students undertaking courses offered by the department, paying particular attention to results that are borderline between grades; ii. Monitor the appropriateness of allocation of final result grades in accordance with the Academic Regulations. Evidence to substantiate recommendations regarding grades may be requested from CCIs;
2011
Evaluators Space
iii. iv.
Advise the HOD, who will submit CIE evaluation marks to Dean(E); Monitor the effectiveness of evaluation practices in courses offered by the department using, amongst other means, statistics on grade distribution;
v.
Make recommendations to the HOD regarding evaluation policy, procedures and outcomes.
Dean (Evaluation) It is the responsibility of Dean, E to receive, file and secure the official (by principal) signed copy of following documents: Syllabus copies of all courses (from Institute Curriculum Committee, approved syllabus from Academic Council) University and Institute Academic Regulations (from Principal and Dean AA) Evaluation Policy with respect to all courses/exam events (from Principal) Student list (from Admissions) Course information sheets of all courses (from HODs) Time Table of lecture and lab sessions of all courses of the semester, syllabus coverage prior to exam events of both CIE and SEE (from HODs) Receive syllabus coverage from CIs forwarded by HODs as and when required List of eligible and non-eligible students appearing for SEE CIE marks lists (from HODs) Course registration enrollment forms of all students to all courses (from HODs) List of potential examiners both internal and external, at least three in number each, for all courses (from HODs) University communications, correspondence relating to evaluation, examination (from Principal) It is the responsibility of Dean, E by the executive orders from Principal and Director to: a. Be a party to academic audit committee; submit reports (to Principal) b. Conduct examinations for all courses under the directions of examination committee; conducting examination comprise of organizing setting of question papers sought from examiners, c. Appointing examiners (by the directions of Principal) d. Receive Set Question Papers and ensure its security and confidentiality e. Drawing time-table for all the examinations and courses, appointing invigilators, drawing invigilation schedule
2011
Evaluators Space
f. Be a party to issuance of hall tickets to eligible students g. Oversee the conduct of examinations (both theory and lab practice) h. Be a party to malpractice reported cases, organize IMPRC meets and communicate the decision to the concerned students by coordinating with institute exam squad i. Conduct pre-evaluation meeting for discussion of scheme and solutions received from paper setters and record minutes of the meeting j. Organize central evaluation of answer script, coding, de-coding process, marks entry, tabulation, verification, grade evolution processes k. Announce results, conduct answer-script viewing program, organize challenge evaluation process l. Receive appeals from students related to examinations and organize redresses and case disposals as an when such appeals are received m. Prepare grade cards and disburse to students n. Communicate and submit results to university as and when requisitions arrive to office forwarded by Principal o. Upkeep, maintain and update all examination records- for reference and submission to university audit committee Dean (Academic Affairs) It is the responsibility of Dean, AA redress student appeal with respect to grades / termination of registration of a course: A student may appeal to the Dean, AA in relation to the outcome of an appeal to the Principal; regarding a review of a decision regarding a grade in a course or termination of a students enrolment. The Dean, AA will deal with the appeal at his or her discretion in accordance with the Academic Regulations. ADMISSION COMMITTEE 1 2 3 4 5 Prof. D.Jawahar Mr. Rahul Parmar Dr.K.N.Balasubramanya Murthy Dr. T.R Seetharam Prof. M.V.Sathyanarayana Chief Executive Officer Dean - Admissions Principal and Director Chairman Convener Member
Chair Professor-Thermal Member Engineering Member - Governing Member Body
Ver. June 2009
2011
Evaluators Space
Goal: To recommend policies that define mission and implement the admissions. To Consider and make recommendations concerning the proposals on admissions on student populations on Undergraduate Post Graduation and Doctoral Education The purpose of the admissions process is to recruit students who will be best able to benefit from the experience of their chosen course.
Activity: The Committee shall focus on the following major issues: Structure and nomenclature and prescription of course/s as and when they are planned Delineate the admissions process for students Provide guidelines to admission and support of transfer students Provide guidelines to admission recruitment of out-of-state students
Responsibilities of the Admissions Committee (ADC) 1. The Admissions Committee is responsible for monitoring and keeping under review the Institutes student admissions requirements and where appropriate for formulating proposals for enhancing student access, transfer and progression arrangements. 2. The Institutes admissions procedures shall operate within the legal framework of the State Government ordinances and the relevant legislation. The committee shall be familiar with the policies and procedures governing the admissions process; understand the intake targets; 3. The committee shall ensure that admissions are conducted in a fair and equitable manner and for the management of the admissions process. This includes checking that applicants at least meet the minimum requirements for admission, as laid down by the university regulations, in addition to the entry requirements for a particular course. The committee is also responsible for communicating any decisions to applicants in a timely, appropriate and accurate manner. The
committee should provide admissions with application statistics on a regular basis to monitor overall progress in meeting recruitment targets.
Ver. June 2009
2011
Evaluators Space
4. The committee shall provide clear operational procedures, which define the roles of staff involved in the admissions process and lay down the framework for a transparent and fair admissions process. 5. To recommend and review admission and re-admission policies that ensure PESIT as an institute most sought after from cross section of society, particularly the student-parent community. 6. Review of forms for admission and revise them as needed. 7. Keep the Governing body informed of trends in admissions. 8. The ADC shall meet at least twice in a semester of 6 months duration.
LIBRARY COMMITTEE 1 2 3 4 Prof. D.Jawahar Dr. K.N.Balasubramanya Murthy Ms. Gayathri Sen Dr. Kanchan Garg Chief Executive Officer Principal and Director Librarian Assistant Physics 5 Dr. Kishore T Kashyap Professor, Department of Member Mechanical Engineering Chairman Member Convener Professor, Member
Goal: The Library Committee is responsible for advising on, developing and monitoring policies on information storage and retrieval and other library issues within the Institute. Activity: The Library Committee provides a forum for open discussion of matters relating to the Library and its services. The committee provides an opportunity to share in policy-making decisions and to make suggestions for improvements in service provision. Role and Responsibilities of Library Committee (LC)
The Faculty Library Committee will: Formulate Library Policy that support the goals and objectives and the mission of the library; Policies refer to the philosophy, rules and regulations under which the library operates; Policy is implemented through the use of procedures; The library committee together with the director and CEO determines library policy.
Space P E S Institute of Technology Department of Information Science & Engineering 2011
The committee shall establish a short and long range strategic plan and implement policy to achieve stated goals; Ensure that Library strategy, policies and services take account of equality of opportunity (Strategic plan formulation questions: Where are we now? Where do we want to go? The vision - how do we see ourselves within the Institute and outside? How do we carry out this vision? The strategic plan is dynamic and can be revised if necessary; it should allows for budgetary planning, staff allocation and student service and departments of the institute) Monitor and encourage effective communications among the library consults the
administration, the Faculty and Departments; Exchange information about the library and information requirements of the academic community of departments, centres and students; disseminate information and good practice with respect to the provision of library services, delivered in collaboration between departments and centres and the Library Contribute to the development of library and information strategy, policies, services and resources To discuss strategic requirements and priorities which will inform the Library's budget setting Report to and advise the Principal on Library matters and deal with matters referred to it by the departments; Report to and advise the Research Committee and the Teaching and Learning Committee on Library matters and deal with matters referred to it by these committees; scrutinize policies proposed by the Library for their implications for teaching and research in the Faculty of Engineering, business administration, science and other disciplines of the institute; monitor budget allocations to the subject areas within the Library; Consider acquisitions procedures and collection development of the library. Monitor the effectiveness of instruction offered by the Library to instructors, and graduate and undergraduate students. The Library Committee shall submit an annual report to Principal & Director which should detail the manner in which the Committee's delegated
Evaluators Space
Ver. June 2009
2011
responsibilities have been exercised by describing the Committee's activities of the previous twelve months. The Committee shall meet once a semester.
STUDENT WELFARE COMMITTEE 1 2 3 Dr. K.N.Balasubramanya Murthy Dr. V.Krishnamurthy Prof.K.S.Rohini Principal and Director Dean-Academic affairs Professor , Physics Chairman Member Member
Goal: The rationale of Student Welfare Committee is to strongly support the development of supportive relationships among students, parents and school staff. The aim is to facilitate the social health of each student and to encourage a sense of belonging to the institute-community, thereby fostering the development of the resilient student and encourage an environment of community trust Activity: The Student Welfare Committee (SWC) of the institute shall operate by: Involving parents and the community in our proceedings. Encouraging supportive relationships based on mutual respect that encourages students to behave responsibly. Teaching and fostering social skills necessary to learn and involve in extra-curricular activities together. Develop an awareness of the consequences for choosing unacceptable behaviours. Implement a curriculum that engages all students in overall personality of studentcommunity.
The role and responsibilities of Student Welfare Committee (SWC) 1. The SWC shall promote parental and student community involvement by promoting a culture of open communication within the institute and the student community; 2. Shall liaise with school executive, promote awareness of welfare issues and encourage a caring environment; shall initiate staff development related to student welfare 3. Shall support families through plan and conducting of parenting skills programs; shall consult parents and the community on issues that affect childrens
Ver. June 2009 NBA Accreditation of UG Engineering Program Page 32 of 193 pages Evaluators Space
2011
development and academic and extra-curricular activity learning within the institute; encourage involvement o students and parents 4. Shall be responsible to create awareness of consequences for choosing unacceptable behaviors by developing individual classroom rules with clearly defined limits and guidelines; by publishing a list of school rules and expectations that will be sent to each family; by encouraging students through discussion, explanation and counseling, to make decisions and choices with the understanding that unacceptable behavior incurs consequences to self and others; foster the development of co-operative skills and inquiry learning coupled with recognition for positive behaviors. 5. Shall publish a booklet of institute rules & regulations to be discussed at the institute and reinforced at home; Staff, students and parents shall be invited to contribute suggestions to the rule booklet to ensure Student Welfare and Discipline Procedures and Assertive Discipline will operate. 6. The Student Welfare Committee, through an evaluation program, will review strategies annually and report to Principal and Director on student welfare issues. The Evaluation sources include: A record of student campus and classroom behavior will be maintained; Student absence information; School-based surveys on bullying and social skills; and Parent surveys on social competencies.
EXTRA-CURRICULAR ACTIVITIES COMMITTEE 1 Prof.Ajoy Kumar Chief Operating Officer & Member - Governing Body 2 3 Prof.K.Chidambara Mr. S.V Satish Professor, Computer Science Associate Engineering 4 Mr. V.Krishna Associate Engineering 5 Mr. M.S Vinay Director(Sports) Member
Evaluators Space
Chairman
Convener
Professor,
Mechanical Member
Professor,
Mechanical Member
Goal: Fostering integrative learning across courses, over time, and between campus and community life is an important goal of undergraduate education.The outcomes are being healthy, staying safe, enjoying and achieving, making a positive contribution, and
2011
achieving economic wellbeing. Extracurricular activities for the students are gains in motivation, independence and a real sense of enjoyment and fun. They are not compulsory, they're absolutely voluntary; they give them team-working skills.
Activity: The committee shall plan and conduct sports activities such as Cricket, Volleyball, Badminton, Basketball, Athletics etc. over the institutes fields. Apart from this, the students can also avail of the facilities of a state of the art Gymnasium. The activities could include organizing and celebrating the Independence Day, republic day and other festivities as planned and determined by the committee from time to time
Role and responsibilities of the Extra-curricular activities committee:
1. Develop mission statement, pamphlet for athletes and parents describing goals and expectations of sports teams each season including behaviour guidelines. Mission statement should reflect the institutional Standards and include the elements of Competence, Character, Civility, and Citizenship. 2. Develop institutional extra-curricular activity policy to provide further support and guidance on matters related to sports and other sports related activities; Increase activities and opportunities especially given the array of current offerings and its appeal to students. 3. Develop communication system to inform middle school parents and students of the practice schedule, competition schedules, weather related schedule changes, directions to the departments and playing fields. 4. The committee shall committee organizes a sports meet once a year and different matches and tournaments are held throughout the year on a regular basis. It should ensure that there is also an active participation of faculty and staff. 5. Ensure that for each branch (department), there is an association which organizes extracurricular activities, lectures and competition both at the inter class as well as inter college levels to stimulate interest in the subject. 6. The committee should strive for student engagement in extracurricular activities which is considered a best practice to foster student learning. One of the approach would be to monitor and organise Extended Week Day Activity involving as many students in intra- and inter departmental extracurricular activities (sports,
2011
cultural and fests); The positive elements of intramural sports can be used to further enhance the inter-institutional program and/or enhance skill development of other sports. 7. Ensure In-house programs that benefit the most students possible should receive priority. 8. Maintaining neutrality in institutional selection and celebrate the
accomplishments of our sports teams regardless of the number of wins and losses. Preservation of our existing programs and any plans for the future should insure the continued success of those programs. ACADEMIC AUDIT COMMITTEE 1 Dr. K.N.Balasubramanya Murthy 2 3 Prof.M.Anuradha Dr.A.Saumya Adikhari HOD, Telecommunication Professor, Electronics Convener & Member Principal and Director Chairman
Communication Engineering 4 Ms. Geetha Shankar Assistant Mathematics 5 Dr. Rangaraju.M.S HOD, Master of Business Member Professor, Member
Administration Goal: Focusing on Oversight, Open Communication, and Best Practices; Academic quality in the Institute requires that the agreed aims, overall objectives and learning outcomes of educational programmes are consistently achieved. Activities: The Committee reports to the Director and Principal on issues of Teaching, Learning & Assessment. Its regular work-activities include: Monitoring the programme of internal reviews of learning and teaching Monitoring the annual academic audit process Monitoring the provision and analysis of course information prescription and conduct evaluation through questionnaires and report twice in a semester Role and responsibilities of Academic audit committee 1. To oversee the implementation, management and monitoring of the Institutes quality enhancement strategy, by means which include the following:
Evaluators Space
Ver. June 2009
2011
a. An annual check by the Learning and Teaching Quality Assurance Officer that practice conforms to the national guidelines issued by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA). b. Receiving a report from each Head of Department auditing all teaching and learning during the running session; interviewing a selection of Heads on the basis of the report, ensuring that each Head is interviewed at least once during a six-month semester period; and ensuring that the results are reported and appropriate action is initiated. c. Conducting periodic reviews of teaching, learning and assessment in each department (both theory and practical sessions).
d. Initiating special reviews, following requests from the Deans, in-charges of individual academic programmes. 2. To advise Academic Council on any changes to the Institutes academic audit procedures. 3. 4. To liaise with other committees on matters relating to Academic audit. To advise the Principal and Director annually of the level of risk identified through academic audit. 5. The Convener of the Academic Audit Committee is to convene at least two meetings every semester. ANTI-RAGGING COMMITTEE 1 Dr. K.N.Balasubramanya Principal and Director Chairman
Murthy 2 Dr.C.V.Srikrishna Professor , Master of Convener
Computer Applications 3 Mr. Srinivas R Assistant Professor , Master of Member Computer Applications 4 5 Mr. T.S.Seetharaman Mr. M.S.Vinay Warden Boys Hostel Sports Director Member Member
Evaluators Space
Goal: Ragging of any kind is declared as a criminal offence and is strictly banned in the campus, its hostels as per the Honble Supreme Court directions. The goal of the
Ver. June 2009
2011
committee is to uphold, comply and to be vigilant to the departures in this directive of the court. Ragging needs to be perceived as failure to inculcate human values. [Directives of the Supreme Court of India, dated May 16, 2007 in SLP No (s) 24295 of 2006 University of Kerala Vs Council, Principals, Colleges, Kerala & Ors (with SLP(C) No. 24296-99/2004 & W.P. (Crl) No. 173/2006 and SLP(C) No. 14356/2005).
Activities: The committee to look into the nuisance of ragging; Studying various aspects of ragging, means and methods to prevent it, possible action that can be taken against those who indulge in it, and action against offenders in the event of ragging.
Role and responsibilities of Anti Ragging Committee: Publicise and ensure all students read the recommendations of Supreme Court recommendations; The recommendations imply the role and responsibility of antiragging committee:
1.
The punishment to be meted out has to be exemplary and justifiably harsh to act as a deterrent against recurrence of such incidents.
2.
Every single incident of ragging where the victim or his parent/guardian or the Head of institution is not satisfied with the institutional arrangement for action, a First Information Report must be filed without exception by the institutional authorities with the local police authorities. Any failure on the part of the institutional authority or negligence or deliberate delay in lodging the FIR with the local police shall be construed to be an act of culpable negligence on the part of the institutional authority. If any victim or his parent/guardian of ragging intends to file FIR directly with the police, that will not absolve the institutional authority from the requirement of filing the FIR.
3.
In the prospectus to be issued for admission by educational institutions, it shall be clearly stipulated that in case the applicant for admission is found to have indulged in ragging in the past or if it is noticed later that he has indulged in ragging, admission may be refused or he shall be expelled from the educational institution.
Evaluators Space
4.
It shall be the collective responsibility of the authorities and functionaries of the concerned institution and their role shall also be open to scrutiny for the purpose
Ver. June 2009
2011
of finding out whether they have taken effective steps for preventing ragging and in case of their failure, action can be taken; for example, denial of any grant-inaid or assistance from the State Governments. 5. Anti-ragging committees and squads shall be forthwith formed by the institutions and it shall be the job of the committee or the squad, as the case may be, to see that the Committee's recommendations, more particularly those noted above, are observed without exception and if it is noticed that there is any deviation, the same shall be forthwith brought to the notice of this Court. 6. The Committee constituted pursuant to the order of this Court shall continue to monitor the functioning of the anti-ragging committees and the squads to be formed. They shall also monitor the implementation of the recommendations to which reference has been made above. 7. Ensure taking a signed undertaking from students in tune with the provisions of anti-ragging verdict by Honble Supreme Court ( the format, as below) Goal: Prevention of sexual harassment should be improved to ensure that legal obligations are being met; Any person aggrieved in this matter may fearlessly approach ANTI-SEXUAL HARASSMENT COMMITTEE 1 Dr. Murthy 2 3 4 Dr. K.Narasimha Murthy Prof. V.S Chakravarthy Prof. Shylaja S S HOD, Mechanical Engineering HOD, Science & Humanities Convener Member K.N.Balasubramanya Principal and Director Chairman
HOD, Information Science & Member Engineering
Ms. M.S.Sunitha
Assistant Professor, Electronics & Communication Engineering
Member
the committee for a fair and concerned hearing and redressal. Role and responsibility of Anti-sexual harassment committee: 1. To ensure provision of a work and educational environment that is free from sexual harassment (Sexual harassment is defined by law from the perspective of the person who feels they have been harassed and it occurs if the person who feels they have been harassed feels offended, humiliated, or intimidated by the conduct and it is
Ver. June 2009
2011
Evaluators Space
reasonable, in all the circumstances that the person who feels they have been harassed would feel offended, humiliated or intimidated). 2. To take all reasonable steps (active and preventive in nature) to prevent the harassment occurring; To address any oral/written complaint about: unwelcome sexual advances, unsolicited acts of physical intimacy, unwelcome requests for sexual favours or other unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature. Unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature includes oral or written statements of a sexual nature to a person, or in a person's presence. 3. Obtain high level support from the chief executive officer and Principal & Director for implementing a comprehensive strategy: providing information to all staff and students about what constitutes sexual harassment and about their responsibility not to sexually harass other staff and students providing information and training to managers, supervisors and staff conducting teaching and learning activities on meeting their responsibilities in relation to maintaining a work and study environment free from sexual harassment 4. Develop a written policy which prohibits sexual harassment. The Institute shall have a Sexual Harassment Policy. The policy outlines the Institutes key commitments and legal responsibilities and provides a definition of sexual harassment and behaviours that are not acceptable. Complaints of sexual harassment are handled separately for staff and students under the Staff Complaints Policy and Sexual Harassment Complaints Resolution Procedures for students. 5. Regularly distribute and promote the policy at all levels of the organisation; Ensure that managers and supervisors discuss and reinforce the policy at staff meetings; Provide the policy and other relevant information on sexual harassment to new staff as a standard part of induction; Periodically review the policy to ensure it is operating effectively and contains up to date information. 6. Display anti-sexual harassment posters on notice boards in common work areas and distribute relevant brochures; Conduct regular awareness raising sessions for all staff on sexual harassment issues. 7. Ensure that complaints processes:
NBA Accreditation of UG Engineering Program Page 39 of 193 pages Evaluators Space
Ver. June 2009
2011
are clearly documented; are explained to all employees; offer both informal and formal options for resolution; address complaints in a manner which is fair, timely and confidential; are based on the principles of natural justice; provide clear guidance on internal investigation procedures and record keeping; give an undertaking that no employee will be victimised or disadvantaged for making a complaint;
PURCHASE COMMITTEE 1 2 Prof. D. Jawahar Dr. K.N.Balasubramanya Murthy 3 4 Prof.Ajoy Kumar Dr.Venkatesh Vadde Chief Operating Officer Member - Governing Body Professor, Electronics Communication Engineering 5 Dr.V.Raghupathy Professor, Engineering al: Purchase of items/services/goods/equipments on project funds and institute funds. Role and responsibilities of Purchase Committee: Formulate a Purchase Procedure taking into consideration of small, medium and big expenditure utilizing either institute-fund or project grant funds. Calling for quotations: a. Purchases up to Rs.25,000/- : without calling for quotations but after satisfying that the items purchased or services acquired are of requisite quality / specification and have been purchased from a reliable supplier at a reasonable cost. b. Purchases above Rs.25,000/- and up to Rs.100,000/- : Minimum 3 quotations are to be called for. Mechanical Member Go & Member & Member Chief Executive Officer Principal and Director Chairman Convener
Ver. June 2009
2011
Evaluators Space
c.
Purchases above Rs.100,000/- and up to Rs.10.00 lakh: Notice inviting quotations should be sent to minimum 6 firms as far as practicable. Such quotations should be obtained either from the manufacturers directly or authorized dealers / distributors who are registered with the Commercial Tax Department of the respective State (for VAT purpose)
d.
Purchases above Rs.10.00 lakh/-: Quotations should be obtained by giving wide publicity in the local newspapers. (One or more news papers as situation may demand) in the classified column in respect of stores / consumables. In respect of scientific equipment and related items, tendering through websites system may also be resorted to in addition to news paper advertisement.
e.
Quotation, as far as possible, should be called for from the original manufacturers / principals / reputed and regular dealers only. In cases where quotations are obtained from the agents, a letter of authorization or dealership from the principal is required to be obtained.
d.
To ensure sound financial status, the manufacturer / suppliers are to be asked to mention in the quotation their valid Sales Tax / VAT / Service Tax / PAN registration references
Opening of quotations and preparation of Comparative Statements a. As soon as the last date for receipt of quotations is over, each envelope containing the quotations should be initialed and serially numbered and then opened by the purchase proposer ( to be invited by purchase committee) in the presence of two to three members (depending upon the value of quotation) (preferably from the PC). The representatives of the firm may be allowed to be present on the specified date where substantial amount of Purchases is involved, say above Rs.25,00,000/-. Dated initials of all the members present while opening the quotations should be obtained on each page of the quotation duly high lighting the corrections if any, in the quotation. b. A Comparative Statement of the rates quoted by each firm is required to be prepared simultaneously. A list of quotations which are not considered for inclusion in the Comparative Statement is to be prepared duly recording the reason(s) for non inclusion.
Ver. June 2009
2011
Evaluators Space
Following precautions are required to be taken while preparing a comparative statement. (i) Basic rate of each item and the taxes, insurance, freight etc., are required to be exhibited in the comparative statement. In case spares / attachments also are being purchased along with the main equipment, then separate column may be opened for these items. This would facilitate comparison. Wherever discount has been offered, it may be indicated under the total column with a view to arrive at the net cost quoted. (ii) Special conditions relating to payment, place of delivery of articles, time schedule for supply, warranty, any other charges etc., are required to be noted in the comparative statement. Monetary value of all the items is to be included when arriving at net cost quoted. (iii) The dated signatures of the officials preparing and checking the comparative statement are invariably required to be enfaced on the comparative statement. (iv) Reasons / justification for rejecting the lowest quotations, if any, should also be recorded on the comparative statement. (v) Late quotations (i.e. quotations received after the specified time of opening), delayed quotations (i.e. quotations received before the time of opening but after the due date and time of receipt of quotations) and post quotations offers, should not be considered. c. When the quotations are under examination, no other authority should be allowed to make queries or call for reports or exercise any sort of influence, as it is improper and would lead to delays in taking correct decisions d. Validity of quotation should be sufficiently longer, say upto 60 days, so that the proposal can be processed without any need for seeking re-validation. e. From among those suppliers meeting all the specifications prescribed by us, the one who has quoted the lowest may be called for negotiation , if felt necessary Documents required to be kept in any purchase proposal file: A neatly arranged and prepared file (not loose sheets), serially numbered, may be opened, keeping the following documents therein:
2011
Evaluators Space
a) b) c) d) e)
Notice inviting quotations / tenders and / or a report of survey conducted. Copy of in principle approval, if available Quotations / bids received (all in original) Report of the Technical committee (in the case of two-bid system). Comparative Statement(s) pre-negotiation and post-negotiation, signed by the proposer on each
e)
Purchase Proposal in the prescribed format, duly obtaining the signatures of the PC members (wherever required)
Placing Purchase Orders: a. All proposals which require approval of the appropriate authorities (Heads of Department, Principal etc.) Empowered to sanction the expenditure, are required to be submitted to them duly complying the formalities a. As soon as approval of the appropriate authority is obtained for purchase of the articles etc from a particular firm, a purchase order should be placed on the firm duly specifying the terms & conditions of the institute of the quotation by the indenter. Acknowledgement of purchase order is to be obtained from the party. Each purchase order should be assigned a separate serial number in each financial year commencing from serial number one on 1 st April and ending the last serial number on the 31st March. For this purpose a purchase Order Register should be maintained. Maintenance of a purchase Order Register is mandatory and Internal Audit should ensure about it. A review of pending purchase orders should be made periodically and necessary follow up action taken with the firms concerned for expediting the supplies. b. A copy of the purchase order/work order/service order may be sent to Bills Section / Projects Section as the case may be so that while admitting the bill for payment, they may be linked with the P.O. and make an endorsement as paid & cancelled. The unpaid P.Os will be reviewed at the end of 31 st March and report given to Accounts Section quantifying the out standings to account for them as O/S Liabilities in the Balance Sheet. c. Receipt of the equipment etc, the indenting official shall take steps for installation and commissioning. Upon satisfactory commissioning, suitable entries in the Assets Registers (in respect of durable and long life items) or in the Stock
2011
Evaluators Space
Register (in respect of consumable items) shall be made. These details are required to be noted on the back side of the invoice / bill with proper attestation bearing full signature with date and stamp. d. As regards the purchase for Projects by the respective Project Investigators, a copy of the purchase order and invoice may be marked to the Head/Principal, so that the stock register is periodically updated by the School Office on receipt of the same. e. The F&A should send a copy of the cheque forwarding memo to the user department to update the Bills Register. RESEARCH COMMITTEE 1 2 Dr. K.N.Balasubramanya Murthy Dr.A.Srinivas Principal and Director Dean , Research Chairman & Convener
Development 3 Dr. S. Natarajan Professor, Information Member
Science & Engineering 4 Dr. C.S.Ramesh Professor, Engineering Goal: Promotion of Research culture. Facilitation and promotion of the development of strategic direction of research within the Faculty, improvements in the quality and impact of that research, and the growth of local, national and international research collaborations. Role and responsibilities of Research Committee 1. Advise the Dean R & D on all Faculty matters relating to Research and Research of Higher Degree students; 2. Facilitate growth of research activity in the Faculty, including developing mechanisms and targets to achieve this; 3. Develop and maintain, coordinate and plan the development of research infrastructure across the Faculty; 4. Develop and coordinate strategies for maximising the Facultys success in gaining external research funding; 5. Members to Chair the Facultys Research Committee (departmental / institutional) and ensure regular communication among the Facultys Research
Mechanical Member
2011
Evaluators Space
Higher Degree coordinators wherever research that could lead to dissertation, report or thesis is produced; 6. Assume the responsibility for the establishment of policy and procedures for the allocation of funds in those areas specified by the Research Dean in consultation with Principal & Director of the Institute; 7. Assume responsibility for the evaluation of Faculty applications for internal faculty funding research project schemes; 8. Represent the Faculty on appropriate University Committees, working parties and review teams e.g. University Research Committee; 9. Maintain and disseminate current information about relevant research policy areas and initiatives in government (state and central), in the professions and in relevant industries, including external funding opportunities; 10. Develop strategies to foster research collaborations within the Faculty, across Faculties and Institutes, industries and with parties abroad. 11. Evolve institutional policy of PhD admission/evaluation criteria 12. Explore student/faculty exchange programs with national and international research institutes 13. Formulate faculty incentive provisions with respect to article publications in peerreviewed journals. 14. Promote/ encourage faculty-student research leading to obtain patents. 15. Strive for high research conduction and planning activities and promote research culture across the institute.
BOARD OF APPOINTMENTS AND PERFORMANCE REVIEW 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Prof. D. Jawahar Dr. K.N.Balasubramanya Murthy Prof.Ajoy Kumar Dr.J.K.Suresh Dr.Jayaraj Dr.T.R.Seetharam Dr.K.N.Seetharamu Chief Executive Officer Principal and Director Chairman Convener
Member - Governing Body Member VTU-Nominee VTU-Nominee Chair Professor- Thermal Engineering Professor Thermal Engineering Member Member Member Member
Ver. June 2009
2011
Evaluators Space
Goal: Performance management system for academic professional and administrative (Personnel Faculty: Technical & non-technical & Administration) employees that is delivered in a manner that is appropriate to the nature of the work, appropriately recognizes and rewards exemplary performance (promotions, etc.), provides for the growth and development of the employee, and addresses substandard performance.
Role and responsibility of board of appointments and performance review 1. review a. Review of Annual Performance Summary Report The Board shall review will review the annual performance summary report prepared by the faculty being reviewed and assess the work and progress toward goals. b. Performance Feedback from Others The board might seek feedback regarding the facultys performance from others as appropriate. In doing so, ensure that procedures are consistent for all faculty in the department unless special circumstances exist. c. Preparation of Written Evaluation The board will prepare a written evaluation regarding the performance of the faculty being reviewed. d. Meeting with the faculty The board will meet with the faculty, provide the review, and discuss review points. e. Discussion of Next Years Goals and Areas for Growth The board will engage the employee in a discussion of expectations and goals for the coming year and areas for professional growth. f. Central Personnel File The board will forward a copy of the employees completed performance review to the Office Establishment for inclusion in the employees personnel file. The board shall be responsible for Conducting the annual performance
Ver. June 2009
2011
2.
The board shall evolve Performance Management Evaluation and
Evaluators Space
Development System A. Components: Critical components of the Institute's performance management system include: 1. Communicating performance expectations to individual employees; 2. Assisting employees in connecting their objectives to the Institutes overall mission through goal setting; 3. Conducting an annual review of employee performance with written documentation; 4. Measuring the degree to which expectations are met; 5. Addressing areas needing improvement through training, coaching, and other methods; 6. Encouraging, guiding, and supporting individual development plans; 7. Dealing with substandard performance; 8. Recognizing and rewarding performance; 9. Providing one basis upon which salary increases are determined; and 10. Making decisions, as appropriate, as a function of performance evaluation. I-I.2.2 Defined rules, procedures, recruitment and promotional policies etc (5) (List of the published rules, policies and procedures, year of publications, awareness among the employees /students, availability on web etc) The rules and policies regarding recruitment and promotion are as per AICTE and University norms. The AICTE pay scales are implemented. Additional increments are given to staff members who excel in academics and research. Recruitment Procedure: The approval to the sanctioned posts is first taken from the university Approval from university is then taken for publishing the advertisement to invite applications. The advertisement is published at local and national level. Selection committee duly appointed by management conducts the interviews. The eligible and selected candidate names are recommended for approval.
Ver. June 2009
2011
The appointment is done after the due approval from the management.
Evaluators Space
I-I.2.3 Decentralization in working and grievance addressal system (5) Decentralization in working: List of faculty members who are administrators/decision makers for various assigned jobs: # NAME DEPARTMENT ROLE
PLANNING AND EVALUATION COMMITTEE 1 2 Prof D Jawahar Dr.K.N.Balasubramanya Murthy 3 Prof Ajoy Kumar Chief Operating Officer Member - Governing Body 4 Dr Kavi Mahesh Professor, Department of Member & Member Chief Executive Officer Principal and Director Chairman Member
Computer Science & Engineering 5 Dr.Koshy George Professor , Department of Convener
Telecommunication Engineering GRIEVANCE APPEAL COMMITTEE 1 Dr Murthy 2 3 Dr.R.Vasudevan Iyer Prof.Ajoy Kumar Assistant Professor Physics Chief Operating Officer & Member - Governing Body 4 5 Prof. S S Patil Dr.Keshavan.B.K Professor, Mechanical Engineering HOD Electrical Engineering & Dean-Evaluation EXAMINATION COMMITTEE 1 2 Prof.D.Jawahar Dr Murthy 3 4 5 Prof.Nitin V Pujari Dr.J.Suryaprasad Prof.V.Krishnamurthy Dean Continuing Education Member of Governing Body Dean-Academic affairs Member Member Convener
K.N.Balasubramanya
Principal and Director
Chairman
Convener Member
Member Member
Chief Executive Officer Principal and Director
Chairman Member
K.N.Balasubramanya
Ver. June 2009
2011
Evaluators Space
ADMISSION COMMITTEE 1 2 3 Prof D Jawahar Mr.Rahul Parmar Dr. Murthy 4 5 Dr.T.R.Seetharam Prof.M V Sathanarayana Chair ProfessorThermal Engineering Member - Governing Body Member Member K.N.Balasubramanya Chief Executive Officer Dean Admissions Principal & Director Chairman Convener Member
LIBRARY COMMITTEE 1 2 Prof.D Jawahar Dr Murthy 3 4 Ms.Gayathri Sen Dr.Kishore T Kashyap Librarian Professor , Mechanical Engineering Convener Member K.N.Balasubramanya Chief Executive Officer Principal & Director Chairman Member
STUDENT WELFARE COMMITTEE 1 Dr. Murthy 2 3 4 Dr.V Krishnamurthy Prof.K S Rohini Dr.Raju Gubbi Dean - Academic Affairs Professor , Physics Professor Electronics & Member Member Member K.N.Balasubramanya Principal & Director Chairman
Communication EXTRA-CURRICULAR ACTIVITIES COMMITTEE 1 2 3 Prof.Ajoy Kumar Prof.K Chidambara Mr.S.V.Satish COO & Member - Governing Body Professor , Computer Science Associate Professor Mechanical Engineering 4 Mr.V.Krishna Associate Professor Mechanical Engineering 5 Mr.M.S.Vinay Director (Sports) Member Member Chairman Convener Member
Ver. June 2009
2011
Evaluators Space
ACADEMIC AUDIT COMMITTEE 1 Dr Murthy 2 Prof.M.Anuradha HOD Telecommunication Convener K.N.Balasubramanya Principal & Director Chairman
Engineering 3 4 Dr.A.Saumya Adikhari Ms.Geetha Shankar Professor Telecommunication Assistant Professor - Mathematics Member Member
ANTI-RAGGING COMMITTEE 1 Dr Murthy 2 Dr. C.V.Srikrishna Professor Master of Computer Convener Applications 3 Mr. Srinivas R Assistant Professor Master of Member Computer Applications 4 5 Mr. T S Seetharaman Mr. M.S.Vinay Warden Boys Hostel Sports Director Member Member K.N.Balasubramanya Principal & Director Chairman
ANTI-SEXUAL HARASSMENT COMMITTEE 1 Dr Murthy 2 3 4 Dr.K Narashimha Murthy Prof. V S Chakravarthy Prof. S S Shylaja HOD Mechanical Engineering HOD Science & Humanities HOD Information Science and Engineering 5 Ms. M.S.Sunitha Assistant Professor, Electronics Member Convener Member Member K.N.Balasubramanya Principal & Director Chairman
and Communication Engineering PURCHASE COMMITTEE 1 2 Prof.D.Jawahar Dr Murthy 3 Prof. Ajoy Kumar COO & Member - Governing Body Member K.N.Balasubramanya Chief Executive Officer Principal & Director Chairman Convener
Ver. June 2009
2011
Evaluators Space
Dr.Venkatesh Vadde
Professor
Electronics
and
Member
Communication Engineering 5 Dr.V Raghupathy Professor Engineering RESEARCH COMMITTEE 1 Dr. Murthy 2 3 Dr. A.Srinivas Dr. S.Natarajan Dean Research & Development Professor Information Science and Engineering 4 Dr. C.S.Ramesh Professor Engineering 5 Dr. R.Muralishankar Professor Telecommunication Engineering BOARD OF APPOINTMENTS AND PERFORMANCE REVIEW 1 2 Prof D Jawahar Dr Murthy 3 4 5 6 7 Prof. Ajoy Kumar Dr. J K Suresh Dr. Jayaraj Dr. T.R.Seetharam Dr. K.N.Seetharamu Member - Governing Body VTU-Nominee VTU-Nominee Chair ProfessorThermal Engineering Professor Thermal Engineering Member Member Member Member Member K.N.Balasubramanya Chief Executive Officer Principal and Director Chairman Convener Member Mechanical Member Convener Member K.N.Balasubramanya Principal & Director Chairman Mechanical Member
I-I.2.4 Transparency and availability of correct/unambiguous information (5) Dissemination and Availability of institute/program specific information through the web: The institute has hosted its own website which is updated as and when required. The institute and programme specific information is made available to all aspirants through the web-site. The web-site URL is: www.pes.edu
Ver. June 2009
2011
Evaluators Space
I-I.3 Budget allocation and its utilization (10) (Summary of current financial years budget and the actual expenditures incurred (exclusively for the College/Institute) for three preceding financial years) (Figures in Rs. Lakhs) Item Acquisition of land and new buildings and infrastructural built-up Library Laboratory Equipment Laboratory Consumables Teaching and NonBudgeted in CFY 45 50 360 1300 Expenses in CFYm1 40 50 330 1200 Expenses in CFYm2 30 40 300 1100 -
teaching staff salary Travel Others (building rent, telephone, electricity, affiliation fees, vehicle M & R, hospitality and miscellaneous) I-I.4 Library (25)
440
400
300
I-I.4.1 Library space and ambience, timings and usage (5) Reading Space # of Seats in reading space: 250 Carpet area of Lib. 3,065 sqm 750sqm # of Users (Reading 250 per day # of Users (issue book) 500 per day space) Timings: Academic Working day 8 am to 6 am Academic Weekend 8 am to 12 pm Vacation 8 am to 8 pm I-I.4.2 Availability of a qualified librarian and other staff, Library automation, online access, networking (5) # of Lib. Staff 20 # of Lib. Staff with Degree in Lib. 12 Yes Yes Yes Yes
Computerization for search, indexing, issue/return records ? Bar-coding used? Lib services on internet/intranet? INDEST or other similar membership ?specify
Ver. June 2009
2011
Evaluators Space
I-I.4.3 Variety of titles and the volumes per title (5) # of Titles ___________________ # of Volumes ___________________ # of New Items Titles added CFYm2[2007-08] CFYm1[2008-09] CFY[2009-10] 1859 2893 2796 # of New Editions added ------# of New Volumes added 4086 5210 4999
I-I.4.4 Journal subscription and internationally acclaimed titles (5) # of Technical Items Magazines / Periodicals CFYm2[2007-08] CFYm1[2008-09] CFY[2009-10] 212 206 211 In hard copy 104 103 111 In Soft copy 1532 1532 1532 # of Total Technical Journals subscribed Internationally acclaimed titles in (originals, reprints) ----
I-I.4.5 Digital library (5) Availability of Digital Lib. contents? If available, # of Courses Availability of an exclusive server ? Availability over intranet/internet ? Availability of exclusive space/room ? # of Users # of Books 91 Yes Yes Yes 50 per day Yes Any other ?
I-I.5 Academic support units and common facilities for FIRST YEAR Courses (20) I-I.5.1 Core laboratories (Adequacy of space, number of students per batch, quality and availability of measuring instruments, laboratory manuals, list of experiments) (10)
2011
Evaluators Space
Core Lab Description Physics Chemistry Basic Electrical Engineering Laboratory Basic Electronics Engineering Laboratory Concepts of Computer Programming Laboratory
Space (sq.m) /No. of Students 180/33 220/33
No. of experiments 10 12 10
Quality of instruments* Good Good Good
Lab manuals Available Available Available
200/33
153/33
12
Good
Available
220/33
10
Good
Available
*All labs have sufficient no. of equipments and measuring instruments to carry out all prescribed experiments. All equipments are maintained in good working conditions.
I-I.5.2 Central computing laboratory (4)
Computing Lab Central Computing Facility
Space (sq.m)
No. of Computers
Variety of SWs System and
Usage/Timings
Lab Assistance
310
100
Application
9 AM to 10 PM
Available
System SWs: Windows XP, Vista, Linux, (RHCE4), Novell Netware ETC.
Application SWs: MATLAB, CATIA V5, ANSYS, Auto-CAD, Turbo C++, J-Creator, IBM Rational Suite, Dot Net, Flash, Xilinx, ETAP, Lab-view, Financial accounting system, academic monitoring system
Ver. June 2009
2011
Evaluators Space
I-I.5.3 Manufacturing practices laboratory (4)
Lab Description
Space Sq mts No. /No. Students of experiments
of Quality instruments
of Lab Manuals
Mechanical Engineering Science practice
200/26
Good
Provided
I-I.5.4 Language laboratory (2)
Language Lab Language Laboratory
Space/No Students 60/20
Type of experiments Phonetics Grammar Conversations Group Discussion Personal Interviews Public Speaking Telephonic Skills Letter Writing and Curriculum Writing Reporting Soft Skills Vitae
Quality of instructions Demonstration of background Visualization through visuals Performance audiothe
Guidance/ Learning Basic material provided. Lab manuals are provided. Optional software. study is
I-I.6 Internet (5) Internet Provider: Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL) Band-Width: 100 Mbps Access Speed:
Ver. June 2009
Poor
Good
Excellent
2011
Evaluators Space
Availability: Availability in an exclusive lab for internet use: Availability in most computing labs: Availability in departments and other units: Availability in faculty rooms: Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No
I-I.7 Co-curricular and extracurricular activities (10) I-I.7.1 Co-curricular and extra-curricular activities, e.g., NCC/ NSS, cultural activities etc. (5) Not all learning at PESIT is confined to the classroom. Besides curricular activities, students are engaged in co-curricular and extracurricular activities. This is normally done by students associations and student chapters. Field trips, co-curricular and extracurricular activities provide opportunities for students to explore new fields of interest, cultivate leadership skills, and learn teamwork. All PESIT students participate in a widerange of activities which currently include the production of weekly news letter, performing arts, participation in programming and quiz contests and paper presentation contests. Most of these activities are suggested by the students themselves. From publishing the news letter to running the student council and other associations, the PESIT students are always engaged in developing a dynamic culture, fostering collaboration and cooperation.
Co-curricular activities: Each year there is an abundance of stimulating programs and activities from which students may select, for provocative and important use of their out of classroom time. Broadly known as co-curricular activities, these opportunities for involvement are an integral part of college life, offering students additional avenues in which to explore their talents, passions and interests. Participating in co-curricular activities, our students continue to apply what they learn in the classroom to enhance their knowledge and performance.
Ver. June 2009
2011
Evaluators Space
As a part of co-curricular activities, paper presentation contest, quiz contests, project exhibitions and robotic competitions are organized in the institution and students are encouraged to participate in such events. Every year institute arranges national level and university level paper presentation contest and project competitions. The details are given in Table below. Industrial visits are arranged every semester for the students to get acquainted with the industrial environment. Guest lectures of entrepreneurs are arranged for the motivation of the students. Training programmes are arranged from various professional trainers.
Events conducted Atmatrisha Prakalpa Ninanada Infini Sanskriti Manage Science Fest Extended Week Day activities
Extra Curricular Activities: Activities undertaken throughout the year:
Publication of news letter PESIT students publish a newsletter with the objective of establishing connectivity among the students of University. The newsletter focuses on the current happenings in the world, campus placements and information on various entrance examinations for PG admissions. Sports Sports week Infini is celebrated by organizing intercollegiate sports events like Long Jump, Volleyball, Basket ball, Table Tennis, Cricket, Chess, and Carom and winners are awarded medals on Annual Day.
2011
Evaluators Space
Performing Arts Every year, a cultural programme named Samskriti is held to encourage students to participate in performing arts. This program is very useful to bring out latent talent of students. Various events like singing, playing musical instruments, drama, monoacting, mimicry, and dance are arranged. AdventureActivities Adventure activities such as Trekking, Mountaineering is held for interested students during vacation. Literary activities In order to encourage students to participate in literary activities; the institute publishes annual magazine Eclat that provides students an opportunity to express their feelings and showcase their hidden talents in variety of fields like writing articles and poems, technical articles, painting and photography skills. Other Activities Personality Development and Yoga/Meditation are held to enlighten the students about a spiritual part of growth in themselves. Such activities are held on a regular basis that ensures in the holistic development in the students.
I-I.7.2 Sports grounds and facilities (5) The institution has a huge sports ground. There are well equipped gym and sports kits. Students are encouraged to participate in various zonal and inter-zonal tournaments; they are paid daily allowances and travelling expenses. Students are provided with various sports kits and equipments. They participate in inter collegiate and inter University matches. Annual Sports Meet is celebrated every year with various sports events like Long Jump, Volleyball, Table Tennis, Cricket, Chess, and Carom etc. Institute sport ground has following facilities:
Cricket ground Volleyball court Football ground Basket ball court [Indoor & Outdoor]
2011
Evaluators Space
Granite Chess Park Indoor shuttle courts Table Tennis Gymnasium To manage all sport activities, a well qualified physical education Director is appointed.
The institute has a well equipped gym facility. The various equipments available are listed below: S. N. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Equipment Nine Station Multi-gym Squat Machine Smith Machine T Bar Seated Calf Machine Abdominal Machine Incline Bench Decline Bench Flat Bench H-Bar Triceps Bar QTY 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01
I-I.8 Career guidance, Training, placement and Entrepreneurship cell (15)
I-I.8.1 Effective career guidance services including counseling for higher studies (5) An important part of the mission of the Institute is to improve the quality of the graduate student experience. To that end, we spend a considerable amount of time talking with students about their goals, concerns, and suggestions for improving their experience. The Institute is working towards enhancing the institutional culture to better serve the needs of an ever-changing and dynamic learning community. PESIT offers career guidance on all aspects of career planning, job searching, and post-graduate studies. We provide individual counseling through scheduled appointments. In career services, we work with students and alumni towards the following goals:
2011
Evaluators Space
Broad exploration of various career options Pursuing post graduate studies Finding work that is consonant with ones values, such as long-term economic stability, intellectual challenge, professional prestige, working toward a sustainable environment, and/or balancing family and work.
These goals are achieved through following: Maintain i.e, substantial databases of jobs, part-time and full-time post-graduate programmes, and help students prepare for their job search through assistance with resumes and interviewing practice. Assisting students with the application process to post-graduate and professional schools, including advising on optimal application strategies, reviewing personal statements. The institute library is resourced with up-to-date resources on career fields, postgraduate programs and information on potential employers. We bring alumni to campus to participate in seminars on career fields and postgraduate study, and we also manage a network of alumni career advisors who have agreed to talk to our students. We run on-campus recruiting program through which employers come to represent their organizations to our students, as well as interview them for permanent positions. Employers often visit our campus to speak with students in small groups. Sometimes the sessions are planned for students participating in on-campus recruiting programmes. We encourage students to try new techniques and expand their skills. We let students know that mistakes lead to better learning. Share a less-thansuccessful experience of your own and what it taught you. We encourage students to appear for GATE and other such examinations and provide special guidance. We reassure students of their skills and abilities to succeed. We teach students how to break large scholarly tasks into smaller, more manageable ones to avoid becoming overwhelmed.
Ver. June 2009
2011
Evaluators Space
I-I.8.2 Training and placement facility with training-n-placement officer (TPO), industry interaction for training/internship/placement (5) The Institute has established a Training and Placement Cell headed by Training and Placement Officer of Assistant Professor Grade. The activities of the Cell Includes: Strengthen Industry-Institute Interaction. To prepare a comprehensive list of industries. To visit industries frequently to explore possibilities of students recruitment through campus interviews To prepare list of students along with bio-data eligible for various interviews. To conduct programmes for students in areas like personality development, communication skills with help of HRD Committee. To help students to get vocational training in industries during vacation. To make facilities available for the smooth conduct of interviews by visiting industry personnel. To prepare alumni records and update them. To arrange Alumni meet twice every year on Jan 26th & Aug 15th. PRE-PLACEMENT ACTIVITY PROFILING This is a unique initiative by the Departments aimed at preparing the students for their placements. This process was first held for the students of the 2002-2006 graduating batch. The whole process is held in two phases. The first phase is a precursor to the tier three placements {for the companies offering packages below three lakhs per annum). This phase started with a string of written tests. An aptitude test, a vocabulary test, and a psychometric test is conducted initially. Based on the results of this test, top hundred students are listed. Later a mock group discussion involving volunteers from this list and mock interviews for the top ten students are conducted, in the presence of the rest of the students. As a part of this phase, the students are profiled individually. Profiling sessions are held over a course of two months, before the start of the first tier one placements. These are held after the college hours on weekdays and through the day during weekends. The sessions are around five hours each, and each session involves the HOD, handling around two to ten students. The sessions
2011
Evaluators Space
starts with a brief icebreaking session and then later goes on to assess the students, giving tips regarding the placements, and ends with interviews to the individual students. The sessions end with a review of the students' performance and a general advice regarding areas of improvement and study materials. The second phase is mainly aimed at addressing the tier two placements (for companies offering compensation of three to five lakhs per annum). This phase is spearheaded by the KRPs . The students are first carried through sessions that dealt with key points in various subjects and then the students are interviewed on the same topics. This process is carried out after a substantial number of students are placed in tier one companies, during the semester holidays after the sixth semester.
BUDDY SYSTEM This system is another unique initiative by the PESIT to prepare the students for the placements. The system consists of volunteers from among the final year students, who mentor the students of pre - final year for placements. The volunteers will be divided into groups of two and each group has been assigned the responsibility of mentoring six to eight students. The main objectives of this system are: To conduct the profiling session for an extended period of time of one year and thus identify various strong points of each student to develop them and identify various shortcomings of the students to eliminate them. To increase the interaction among senior and junior students in a constructive manner, in a way that will benefit both. A very comprehensive plan will be drawn to achieve these aims. The odd semester is usually been devoted mainly to address the aptitude, vocabulary and human resource aspects of a placement. Thus, in the initial months, the buddies of each final year student will be given tests in aptitude and English. Also they will be prepared by their buddies to face interviews and to participate in group discussions. At the end of the semester, a three hour test to review the performance of each student will be conducted. The even semesters will concentrate more on addressing the technical capabilities of the students. These will be conducted under the guidance of the able faculties of the department. The process will also help each student identifying his or her area of interest, thus helping in deciding the type of companies that he or she has to aspire for. The buddy system also hopes to help the students interact with each other in such a way that they lead to new ideas that may develop into projects and papers.
Ver. June 2009
2011
Evaluators Space
I-I.8.3 Entrepreneurship cell and incubation facility (5) Entrepreneurs assemble resources including innovations, finance and business acumen in an effort to transform innovations into economic goods. This may result in new organizations or may be part of revitalizing mature organizations in response to a perceived opportunity. The most obvious form of entrepreneurship is that of starting new businesses; however, in recent years, the term has been extended to include social and political forms of entrepreneurial activity. Given entrepreneurship's potential to support economic growth, it is the policy goal of our institute to develop a culture of entrepreneurial thinking. This is done by integrating entrepreneurship into education system. The Entrepreneurship and Incubation centre at PESIT fosters creativity and offers support in translating ideas to businesses. The aim is to nurture the spirit of entrepreneurship among talented and ambitious students. The Incubation Centre offers on-site business facilities to aid entrepreneurship among students. The facilities on campus include office space, computers, printers, communication systems, and Internet connectivity etc. It also provides a meeting room for discussion, to propel ideas and to network. Professional Mentoring and Business Advice: The incubation centre would enable students to reshape their business plans to commercial models and to make it a success. The centre would help students: To look in to the procedures, methodology, access funding, mentoring among other activities which are vital to setting up and sustain a business. Provide valuable management and consultancy advice that they will almost certainly need to guide them through the entire how's, why's, what's and when's of business. Impart the hand holding support that most start-ups need, to enable them to move forward and experiment with business models. The Incubation Centre also has connections with organizations and individuals, to encourage students and help them draw on a bigger canvas and facilitate sources of funding for their projects. It provides a business environment, to think and act like entrepreneur. This centre will bring together student innovators, entrepreneurs, Alumni, venture capitalist, bankers, subject experts and mentors to provide an ecosystem that will help students understand the processes and policies related to commercializing their business plans.
2011
Evaluators Space
I-I.9 Safety norms and checks (5) (Specify how safety norms and checks carried out in buildings, laboratories (e.g. those using hazardous chemicals, high voltages etc.) and other critical installations. Comment on how checks are conducted and how frequently are these carried out.) 1) Earthquake resistance: The building has been designed to resist earthquake (ductility provisions) 2) Fire Safety norms and Checks: As per Indian standard code (IS 14435: 1997) the building complies with following norms Sufficient fire extinguishers are provided. (Total 10) Non-combustible materials used for construction and staircase walls with minimum 2h rating. Exit signs and floor indication boards are fixed at strategic locations. All passageways are 3 m wide and staircase width is minimum 1.7 m and 4.8 m. 3) Chemistry Laboratory: Eye flush equipment, Fire extinguisher is provided. Posters for proper use are displayed. Separate room for storing and preparing of hazardous chemicals. Safe disposal of chemicals. 4) Electrical equipments: Electricity Generator housed out of institute building. MCBs are used at all electrical installations. Sufficient Earth connections are provided ( 3 for institute building and 2 for workshop) 5) Workshops: All rotating part machines are provided with protective guards. List of Dos and Donts displayed for students information. It has been made mandatory to wear aprons.
Ver. June 2009
2011
Evaluators Space
CHECKS ON SAFETY NORMS S. N. 1 Details of Check All electrical equipments and installations are checked at start of semester All electrical & mechanical machines are inspected at start & mid semester Fire extinguishers are recharged after expiry date of constituents. Discharge of waste chemicals is done only after pH neutralization Earthings are checked for conductivity. Frequency Half Yearly Quarterly
4 5
Annually
I-I.10 Emergency medical care and first-aid (10)
I-I.10.1 Medical staff to provide first-aid and medical help in emergency: Criterion II: Evaluation and Teaching-Learning Process
II-I.1 Evaluation system (40) II-I.1.1 Published schedule in academic calendar for assignments/mid-semester tests, distribution of corrected scripts (10)
Academic Calendar: Academic calendar is prepared and published prior to beginning of each academic year. The activity calendar shows the start and end of each semester stating various programmes to be conducted, the internal evaluation schedule and the tentative schedule of external evaluation. The start and end of each semester is prescribed by the university.
Ver. June 2009
2011
Evaluators Space
P.E.S INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, BANGALORE-85. C A L E N D A R O F E V E N T S
BE I Semester (Autonomous Scheme) Day Week Month No Mon Tue Wed Thu 1. Aug/Sept 30
2.
Sept
3. 4. 5. 6.
Sept Sept Sept/Oct Oct
13 20 27 4
7.
Oct
11 T1
8. 9.
Oct Oct
18 25
10.
Nov
1 H
11. 12.
Nov Nov
8 Q 15
Session: Aug10 Jan11 No. of working Activities Fri Sat days 31 3 4th Thur 1 2 4 6 EWD FAM TT 10th Ramzan 7 10 11 8 9 4 11th EWD H H Ganesh Chaturthi 14 18th - Wed 15 16 17 18 6 EWD TT 21 25 25th Mon 22 23 24 6 EWD PTM TT 28 29 2 2nd Gandhi 30 1 5 EWD CCM H Jayanthi 7th 7 5 6 8 9 4 Mahalaya H Amavasya T1 Test 1 week(10th 12 13 14 15 16 15th Oct) 5 T1 T1 T1 T1 H 16th Ayudha Pooja 19 20 21 22 23rd Mon 23 6 EWD BBV BBV BBV TT 26 29 30th Wed 27 28 30 6 EWD ASD TT 1st Kannada 2 3 5 4 6 3 Rajyotsava EWD CCM H 5th Naraka Chaturdashi 9 13 13th Fri TT 10 11 12 Q Q 6 Q Quiz Q Q Q EWD PTM week 17 18 19 17th Bakrid 16 20 5 H QPV QPV 20th Fri TT
Ver. June 2009
2011
Evaluators Space
13.
Nov
22 29 T2 6
23 30 T2 7 BBV
24 H 1 T2 8 BB V 15 FAS D 22 29 5
25 2 T2 9 BB V 16 IOH
26 FAM 3 T2 10 LW D 17 H
27 4 T2 11
24th Kanakadas Jayanthi T2- Test2 week Withdr awal of Courses Study holidays IOH- Issue of Hall Tickets Theory Exams 25th Chrismas Practic al Exams
14. 15.
Nov/ Dec Dec
5 5
16.
Dec
13
14
18 IOH 25 H 1 8
17. 18. 19.
Dec Dec/Jan Jan
20 27 3
21 28 4
23 30 6
24 31 7
H : Holiday BBV: Blue Book Verification (3.45 to 4.45PM) EWD: Extended Working Day FAM: Faculty Advisors Meeting PTM: Parents Teachers meet QPV: Quiz Paper Verification CCM: Class Committee Meeting LWD: Last working Day ASD: Attendance & Sessional marks display FASD: Final attendance & Sessional marks display PTM: Parents Teachers Meet
Ver. June 2009
2011
Evaluators Space
P.E.S INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, BANGALORE-85. C A L E N D A R O F EV E N T S BE II, IV, VI Semester (Autonomous scheme) Day Wee k No Mont h Mon Tue We d Thu Fri Sat Session: Jan May 2011 No. of wor king days
Activities 17th
1.
Jan
17
18
19
20
21 FA M
22
2.
Jan
24
3. 4.
Feb
31
Feb
5.
Feb
14
6.
Feb Feb/M ar
21
25 EW D 1 EW D 8 EW D 15 EW D 22 EW D 1 T1 8 EW D 15 EW D 22 EW D 29 EW D
26 H 2
27
28
29 5 PT M 12
26th day
Commence ment of classes, course registration Republic
3 10
4 11 18 CC M 25
5 5
1st Wed TT Course withdrawal 12th, 13th Aatma Trisha 16th Id-Milad 19th Science Fest
9 16 H 23
17
19
24
26
5 T1 Test1 2nd Mahashivar atri
7.
28 T1 7 BBV 14
2 H 9 BB V 16
3 T1 10 BB V 17
4 T1 11 ASD 18 CC M 25 1 CC M
5 T1
8.
Mar
12
9. 10.
Mar
19 26 PT M 2
Mar Mar/A pr
21
23
24
11.
28
30
31
Ver. June 2009
2011
Evaluators Space
12.
Apr
4 H
5 EWD
6 FA M
7 LT
8 LT
13.
Apr
11 LT
12 LT
13 LT
14 H
15 CH
16 H
14.
Apr
18 T2 25
19 T2 26
20 T2 27 BBV 4 FAS D 11 18 25 1 8 AO R 15 22 29 6 13 20 27 3 10
21 T2 28 BBV 5 IOH 12 19 26 2 9 16 23 30 7 14 21 28 4 11
22 H 29 LWD 6 H 13 20 27 3 10 17 24 1 8 15 22 29 5 12
23 T 2 30 7 I O H 14 21 28 4 11 18 25 2 9 16 23 30 6 13
15.
Apr
16.
May
4th Chandramana Ugadi LT - Lab Test (during respective lab sessions) 14thDr. Ambedkar Jayanthi 15t Compensatory Holiday 16th Mahaveer Jayanti LT- Lab Test (during respective lab sessions) T2 Test 2 and Quiz 22nd Good Friday LWDLast Working Day Study Holidays IOH Issue of Hall Tickets 6th Basava Jayanthi Theory Exams Practical Exams/Seminar for special topics 30th May to 11th June-vacation 8th Announcement of Results 9th 11th Registration for summer term 13th Commencement of Summer term 13th June to 12th Aug Mandatory training for non summer term students Exams and Evaluation
17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30.
May May May May/Ju ne June June June June/Ju ly July July July July Aug Aug
9 16 23 30 6 13 20 27 4 11 18 25 1 8
10 17 24 31 7 14 21 28 5 12 19 26 2 9
Ver. June 2009
2011
Evaluators Space
II-I.1.2 Maintenance of Course files class deliveries and their closeness and mapping with Program Educational Objectives (PEOs) (15) (Produce sample (best and average quality) course files, handouts showing course deliveries mapped with the identified PEOs. In case of an affiliated college, there may be a provision of teaching additional topics and supplementary tests/examinations in order to achieve the identified PEOs. This exercise is aimed at to assess the provision and ability of the college to do the above in order to achieve the stated PEOs.)
Departmental Central academic monitoring cells are formed to monitor the maintenance of course files and class deliveries. This cell is headed by HOD and class monitors for each class are the members of the cell. This cell provides the guidelines for preparation of course files, planning of weekly tests and maintenance of attendance records. Computerized academic monitoring system is in place.
Maintenance of Course Files: For each course, a course file is prepared by the concerned faculty. The course file consists of following items. Teaching plan: Teaching plans for each and every course are prepared by the faculty. Whole syllabus is divided into eight equal units and 52 lectures as per the teaching scheme prescribed by the university. The course objectives are defined for each course in line with the PEOs. Lesson plan: Lesson plans are prepared for each lecture in the teaching plan. The lesson plan encompasses the aim, rationale, learning outcomes and the assessment of outcomes. A sample lesson plan Proforma is given below. Sample lesson plan Proforma: PES Institute of Technology Department of . LESSON PLAN
Ver. June 2009
2011
Evaluators Space
Course Code: Course Title: Course Coordinator: Prof.
No.Hours/Week: 4
Cumulative of Classes Syllabus Covered syllabus covered in % 1-7 8-14 15-21 22-28 29-35 36-42 43-49 50-56 Text Books: 1. 2. Reference Books: 1. 2. Question Bank 3 Marks questions 7 Marks questions 10 Marks questions II-I.1.3 Quality of problems in assignments/tests/semester examinations and their closeness and mapping with Program Educational Objectives (PEOs) (15) Produce sample (best and average quality) assignment sheets, lab sheets, test/examination question papers along with model solutions to assess how the PEOs are achieved by examining students knowledge through assignments and examinations. In case of an affiliated college, there may be a provision of additional/supplementary tests/examinations to examine the additional subject
Module 1 Module 2 Module 3 Module 4 Module 5 Module 6 Module 7 Module 8
12.5 25 37.5 50 62.5 75 87.5 100
2011
Evaluators Space
topics covered to achieve the identified PEOs.
This exercise is aimed at to assess the provision and ability of the college to do the above in order to achieve the stated PEOs. Question Bank Question banks are prepared for each topic in the course based on the course objectives and considering the nature of the university question papers. The previous question papers of University are also maintained in the course files. Transparencies and PPTs are included as per the lesson plan requirement. Assignment questions and test question papers along with model solutions are included in the course files. Class Deliveries: Monitoring of class deliveries as per the time table is done by the monitoring cell. Monthly review of syllabus coverage is conducted and necessary corrective measures are suggested. The attendance of students is monitored continuously and defaulter students are counseled. Academic diaries are provided to maintain the attendance record for each theory/ laboratory course and the performance of students in tests. The student attendance along with test performance is communicated to parents by the monitoring cell. Additional curriculum: Additional curriculums are created for each programme to meet its PEOs. The implementation of this curriculum in terms of course files, class deliveries and assessment is monitored by the monitoring cell. II-I.1.3 Quality of problems in assignments/tests/semester examinations and their closeness and mapping with Program Educational Objectives (PEOs) (15) (Produce sample (best and average quality) assignment sheets, lab sheets,
test/examination question papers along with model solutions to assess how the PEOs are achieved by examining students knowledge through assignments and examinations. In case of an affiliated college, there may be a provision of additional/supplementary tests/examinations to examine the additional subject topics covered to achieve the identified PEOs.)
2011
Evaluators Space
In order to assess the achievement of identified programme educational objectives of each programme, the institute has following mechanisms in place: Assignments: Question banks are prepared for each topic in the course based on the course objectives and considering the nature of the university question papers. Assignment problems are chosen from such question banks. Model solutions for assignment problems are prepared by concerned faculty. Continuous assessment system is implemented for assessment of assignments. Laboratory Work: Laboratory plans are prepared for each laboratory course. This plan includes number of experiments as prescribed in the curriculum. Apart from this, two additional experiments/case studies are included in the plan. Laboratory manuals are prepared for all the experiments in the plan and are provided to the students at the time of practical. At the end of each experiment few assignment questions/problems are given. Continuous assessment system is also implemented for assessment of laboratory work. The assessment is done on the basis of timely submission of laboratory sheets, understanding of the experiment through oral questions and participation in performing the experiment. Neatness of the laboratory sheet is also given weightage in the assessment. Weekly tests: Besides the university examinations additional weekly tests are conducted to achieve the identified PEOs. Weekly tests are planned and conducted on every Friday. The schedule of such tests is published in the academic calendar. Three tests are scheduled per course in a semester. Test question papers are set based on the question banks available. Test papers are assessed based on the model solutions. Corrected scripts are distributed to students and results are declared within one week.
Ver. June 2009
2011
Evaluators Space
The test results are also communicated to parents. Assessment of additional curriculum: Institute has created and implemented an additional curriculum for each programme. Institute has a provision of additional tests/examinations to examine the additional subject topics covered in the additional curriculum to achieve the identified PEOs. At the end of the additional course, the tests are conducted for assessment of the course objectives. Test papers are assessed on the basis of model solutions and the corrected scripts are distributed to students. II-I.2 Tutorial classes/ remedial classes/ mentoring (20) II-I.2.1 Tutorial classes to address personal level doubts and queries: size of tutorial classes, hours per subject in timetable (10)
Provision of tutorial classes in the time table: Tutorial sheets:
Yes Yes
No No
Tutorial classes taken by: Faculty/Teaching Assistants/Senior students/others: No. of tutorial classes per subject:01 per week No. of subjects with tutorials: 1st year: 04 No. of students:20 per tutorial class 3rd year:05 4th year: 08
2nd year:07
II-I.2.2 Remedial classes and additional make-up tests to help academically weaker students: list of remedial classes, schedule of classes/tests and students lists (5) Remedial Classes: Provision of remedial classes in the time table No. of subjects having remedial classes: 02 Subjects per course out of total: 05 (Avg.) subjects per semester per course No. of students having remedial classes: 20% (Avg.) students out of total students in a semester for a course No. of hours of remedial classes:
Yes
No
2011
01 per subject per week
Make-up Tests: Provision of makeup tests in academic calendar: No. of subjects having make-up tests: 02 Subjects per course out of total: 05 (Avg.) subjects per semester per course No. of students having make-up tests: 20% (Avg.) students out of total students in a semester for a course No. of hours of makeup tests: 01 per subject per week II-I.2.3 Mentoring system to help at individual levels (5) The Institute is working towards enhancing the institutional culture to better serve the needs of an ever-changing and dynamic learning community. Effective mentoring begins with the faculty. When it comes to academic success and persistence, there is no substitute for a healthy relationship between faculty and students. Mentoring and Guidance provides encouragement to the students as under: Encourage students to discuss their ideas. Encourage students to try new techniques and expand their skills. Let students know that mistakes lead to better learning. Share a less-thansuccessful experience of your own and what it taught you. Reassure students of their skills and abilities to succeed. Teach students how to break large scholarly tasks into smaller, more manageable ones to avoid becoming overwhelmed. Yes No
Mentoring system to help at individual levels: There are minimum twelve faculties in each program working as guardians / mentors for the students. Each faculty looks after 15 students. The faculty monitors their progress and reports to In-charge of counseling cell. This mentoring is for over all development of the student. Professional guidance is provided by arranging lectures of eminent personalities from academics, industry and social workers. Lectures of faculty from other institutions are organized. A counseling sheet is maintained by faculty where all details of the students of his/her group are recorded. History cards of the students are prepared in
2011
Evaluators Space
which attendance, examination marks and family details are recorded. The same card is continued till the student completes his graduation.
Type
of
Mentoring:
Professional
Guidance/Career
advancement/Course
work
specific/Lab specific/Total development (Mentoring covers all types of guidance) No. of faculty mentors: mentor: 15 Frequency of meeting: Weekly/Monthly/No. per semester/Need based/other 12 per programme No. of students per
II-I.3 Teaching evaluation process: Feedback system (30)
II-I.3.1 Design of Proforma and process of feedback evaluation (5) No. of feedback items: 07 Space for descriptive feedback/suggestions: Any consistency check: Any performance/attendance profile: Frequency of feedback collection: Feedback collection: Hard-copy/Web-based II-I.3.2 Feedback analysis and percentage of students participation (5) Feedback collected for all courses: No The feedback collection process: Who collects the feedback? Feed back forms are given to student CR who distributes them amongst all students. The forms are again collected by the administrative staff of the departments at the end of the semester and are given back to the HOD. When feedback is collected? In the mid of the semester Percentage of students participating: Hundred percent students present at that time The feedback analysis process: Is this done manually?
No. of levels: 04 No Yes No Twice in a semester No
Yes
2011
Yes What metrics are calculated? Percentage of E, Vg, G, F and A is calculated What is inferred from the metrics? If percentage of Excellent (E) comment is high, then it indicates that the rapport between teacher and students is nice and the students understand the teaching. High percentage of very good (Vg) and good (G) indicates efforts are being taken by the faculty and still there is a scope for improvement. High percentage of fair (F) indicates less involvement of the faculty and poor rapport with the students. The faculty needs to do hard work and counseling is needed from senior faculty. A stands for Average. How are the comments used? The comments are analyzed by the concerned HOD and are discussed with the concerned faculty individually. Suggestions for improvement in teaching performance are given if required.
II-I.3.3. System of reward / corrective measures etc. (10)
Basis of reward/corrective measures: System of Reward: Best performing faculty based on the feedback received from the students is rewarded by issuing a letter of appreciation. Performance rating of faculty through student feedback system is one of the factors in evaluating the annual performance of the faculty. Based on the annual performance of the faculty the annual increments are released.
Corrective Measures: The faculties performing below average are asked for written explanation and counseled to improve their performance in future. Were extraneous factors like hard/soft attitude of the instructor considered? Yes No Was result considered
Ver. June 2009 Evaluators Space
Yes
No
2011
No. of awards:
in CAY:
18
in CAYm1:18
in CAYm2:18
No. of corrective action: in CAY: 03
02
in CAYm1: 04
in
CAYm2:
II-I.3.3 Any feedback mechanism from alumni, Parents and industry (10)
The mechanism of feedback collection and analysis: The institute has a mechanism for collection of feedback from alumni, parents and industry. Every year parents meet is arranged to discuss on issues like teaching learning process, infrastructural facilities, performance of their wards and placement activity. Parents are allowed to give feedback orally and in written form. A feedback form is developed for this purpose. Institute has a registered alumni cell in place. Alumni meet is arranged every three years to interact and receive constructive suggestions for future institutional development and to enhance industry-institute interaction and the placement activity. At the time of meet feedback is taken in written form. Feed back is also received through e-mail. Feedback from the industry is also collected where our alumni is working.
No. of feedback received: in CAY: Typical corrective actions:
50
in CAYm1:30
in CAYm2:20
The feedback received is analyzed and the suggestions/comments are divided into following categories: Teaching-Learning process development Infrastructural Development Curriculum development Amenities and other facilities Based on the suggestions a time bound action plan is prepared and executed. II-I.4 Self Learning and Learning beyond syllabus (20) II-I.4.1 Generation of self-learning facilities and motivation (10) Self-learning is promoted in the institute by generating self-learning facilities under
2011
various modes. Students are encouraged for self-learning by personal counseling and organizing various contests. Following are the various modes of self-learning and facilities created therein. Web-based Learning: The Internet is an open information system in which various sources of information, media and materials such as texts, images, video sequences can be linked together in diverse ways to form so-called self-learning environments. Internet offers new possibilities to structure, represent, adapt and integrate various learning content and materials. Furthermore, due to its interactivity, learners can process the material in accordance with their individual preferences and strategies at any time and from any place provided an internet connection is available. They may select and examine from a large pool of information only those pieces necessary to meet their learning objectives. Hence, the potential of the Internet self-learning mode is considered to be very high. The institute has created Central internet facility with 100 Mbps leased line and 100 computer terminals facility to promote and motivate students to self-learning. Learning with Multi-media: Availability of course material on intra-net Digital library facility Language lab facility Availability of video lectures in CD form LCD projectors for presentation Classroom Presentations: Allowing students to prepare and present topics from curriculum Arranging presentation on non-technical topics Technical Symposiums: Motivating students to participate in inter-college events for paper presentation and project exhibitions II-I.4.2 Availability of learning beyond syllabus contents and promotion (10) In order to meet the stated PEOs of each programme, an additional curriculum is designed and implemented. The programme specific details of additional curriculum are given below:
2011
First Year Common Courses: Sem/ Year I II MS Office Group Presentation Topics Teaching (Hrs) per Week 02 02 Total(Hrs) 20 20
Mechanical Engineering: Sem/ Year III IV Topics Soft skill development Paper Writing and Paper presentation skills V VI VII VIII Introduction to ANSYS Interview Techniques Value Education KPSC, UPSC, GRE, TOFEL, GATE Other Exam Preparation 02 02 02 02 20 20 20 20 Teaching (Hrs) per Week 02 02 Total(Hrs) 20 20
Electronics and communications Engineering: Sem/ Year III IV V VI VII Topics Soft skills development and Spoken English PCB Design GD & Aptitude Test Crash Course on VLSI & Embedded System Design GATE/GRE Preparation Verilog Simulation Crash Course on VLSI & Embedded System Design Demonstration of satellite Trainer Kit PC Maintenance & Networking Teaching (Hrs) per Week 02 02 02 02 02 Total(Hrs) 20 20 20 20 20
VIII
02
20
Evaluators Space
Information Science Engineering: Sem/ Year

Ver. June 2009
Topics
Teaching (Hrs) per Week
Total(Hrs)
2011
III IV V VI VII
Macromedia Flash Linux Operating System Linux Wizards General Proficiency - I Object Oriented Analysis and Design using UML
02 02 02 02 02
06 06 06 06 14
VIII
General Proficiency - II
02
06
Computer Science and Engineering: Sem/ Year III IV Spoken English Awareness Networking V VI VII VIII PC Hardware Maintenance GATE preparation Interview Techniques Software Testing of Internet & Computer Topics Teaching (Hrs) per Week 02 02 02 02 02 02 Total(Hrs) 20 20 20 20 20 20
Electrical & Electronics Engineering: Sem/ Year III IV V VI VII VIII Topics Spoken and Written English MS Windows, MS Office Journal Paper Writing GATE, IES Preparation GATE, IES Preparation General Proficiency Teaching (Hrs) per Week 02 02 02 02 02 02 Total(Hrs) 24 24 24 24 24 24
Evaluators Space
STUDENT DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY TOTAL STUDENT DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM

2011
The Total Student Development Program (TSDP) focuses on every aspect of student personality, helping them develop interpersonal, technical and business skills. Interpersonal Skill Development Creativity, lateral thinking and communication / people management skills are essential components for progress in any sphere. Students are encouraged to develop these through goal setting exercises, group discussions, mock interviews and presentations. Interested students can also learn French / German / Japanese on campus. Technical Skill Development The depth of technical skills that students develop, depend to a great extent on the course they have chosen. However, all students are given a conceptual grounding in core skills and application orientation through real - time projects to ensure their skills are concurrent with market needs. This is done by in-house faculty and Industries who have signed an MOD under Industry-Institute Partnership. Business Skill Development All students are taught essential business skills through industry interaction as well as innovative channels like Marketing and Finance clubs. We believe that this training will stand them in good stead when they make the transition from employee to employer GIFTED STUDENT DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (GSDP) GSDP is a unique program that brings student achievers to the forefront and helps them realize their potential. An entrance test for GSDP is held once a year. Students who qualify must then go through interviews and group discussions. Both the test and the interviews are conducted by alumni who have been part of GSDP themselves. Students who finally make the GSDP shortlist benefit from an intensive training program conducted by some of the most respected academic minds. This rigorous training includes conceptual skill development, application orientation and project work. The course hones the entire gamut of critical skills that gifted students require and gives them an edge that helps them stay ahead always.
Evaluators Space
STUDENT ACADEMIC SUPPORT PROGRAM (SASP) SASP is a program for the students who are academically weak. This program is aimed on the five percent of the students who generally don't do well in the examinations. Students under this program are selected based on their performances in their previous
2011
examinations. Special coaching is then given for these students so that their performance in the university examinations is better. STUDENT ASSISTANTSHIP PROGRAM In each class, students are given opportunity to become Teaching Assistant (TA) for the faculty members. One TA is allotted for every faculty. Responsibilities of a TA are: o to help the faculty in preparing teaching material o to assist faculty in research / projects o to collect technical information as required by the faculty o to give seminars as required by the faculty o any other assistance requested by the faculty One of the faculty members is designated as SAP coordinator TAs are selected based on their academic record and after conducting a written test The progress of the TA is monitored Incentives are given to TAs based on their performance The regular programs briefed earlier, namely TSDP, GSDP, SAP & SASP are the key processes for the multi dimensional development of the students Deserving students are encouraged to participate in the national and international conferences, seminars, workshops to exhibit their technical talents Student events are conducted to encourage co-curricular and extracurricular talents. Intra-college and inter-college contests are arranged As an example, a forum for light music has been created. Every Tuesday, for 90 minutes, music rehearsals is done. STUDENT COUNSELING / MENTOR1NG Apart from the regular class teachers, a student counselor has been designated to counsel the students who have problems in getting success in their education career. Innovative efforts are put to: o understand the students o motivate the students o bring in to the right track, in case, they are moving out of track o to create interest in studies II-I.5 Faculty Ratio and qualification for FIRST YEAR Common Courses (25) List of faculty members teaching first year courses: First Semester: Academic Year 2008-09
Evaluators Space
2011
Department of Science and Humanities S.no Name Ms Vyajanthimala S Chakravathi Dr. C.D.Satish Ms.K S Rohini Dr. S. Radhakrishna DOB Designa tion Prof Prof Prof Prof Qualifications UG PG Ph.D -Ph.D -Ph.D Date Of Joining 05.10.1988 24.10.2005 24.09.1990 15.03.2006
1 2 3 4
05.07.1953 01.06.1964 06.01.1963 11.01.1955
5 6 7 8 9
Dr.Leela V Dr.Hamsapriye Dr S Akila Ms Renna Sultana Dr.M.Veerabhadra swamy
08.02.1965 12.04.1969 01.08.1954 25.02.1965 27.09.1969
Prof Prof Prof Asst Prof Asst Prof Asst Prof Asst Prof Asst Prof Asst Prof
B.SC M.Sc B.Sc MSc B.Sc M.Sc M.Sc B.Sc. . M.Sc M B.Sc Phil B.Sc M.Sc B.Sc M.Sc BSC B.Sc M.Sc M.Sc M.Sc M Phil M.S C M.Sc M.Sc
Ph.D Ph.D Ph.D -Ph.D
21.06.2010 23.07.2010 09.08.2010 26.10.1995 19.02.2009
10 11 12 13
Ms Geetha Shankar 05.06.1966 Dr. R. Vasudevan Iyer 18.12.1968 Dr. Lata Pasupulety 25.08.1966 Dr.N.Anitha 20.04.1977
BSc B.Sc B.Sc B.Sc
-Ph.D Ph.D Ph.D
16.10.2000 01.08.2007 30.07.2007 23.06.2008
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Dr. K. E. Ganesh Dr.B.A.Kanchan Garg Mr.Divakara S Mr K Raghavendra Rao Dr.K.R.Nagabhus hana Ms. Aparna.B.S. Mr Narahari N Dr. H.G. Anil Kumar
31.12.1977 13.03.1973 20.07.1978 27.11.1976 04.04.1980 26.05.1975 25.10.1981 20.07.1976
Sr Lect Sr Lect Sr Lect Sr Lect Sr. Lect Sr Lect Sr Lect Lecturer
M.Sc B.Sc. . B.Sc B.Sc M.Sc M.Sc
Ph.D Ph.D --Ph.D --Ph.D
11.08.2006 02.06.2008 20.10.2010 03.10.2000 08.08.2008 05.04.2006 11.10.2004 27.11.2006

Evaluators Space
B.Sc. M.Sc B.Sc M.Sc B.Sc M.Sc B.Sc. M.Sc B.Sc M.Sc
S.no
Ver. June 2009
Name
DOB
Designa tion
Qualifications UG PG Ph.
Date Of Joining
2011
D M.S MPhi l
22
Ms. Sunitha.V.R.
20.05.1976
Lecturer
B.Sc B.Sc . B.Sc B.Sc B.Sc B.Sc B.Sc BB M B.Sc B.Sc BE BE BE BE BE B.Te ch BE BE BE BE BE BE BE BE
01.08.2007
23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45
Ms. T.R. Geetha Ms. Deepthi Rao Mr.Chandru Hegde Ms.T.Poornima Ms.K.Vrinda Kamath Mr.N.Manjunath Mr. Edwin R Das Ms.Nityashree N Mr.Shaik Shabbeer Basha Mr.R Keshava Murthy Mr.Sadananda Megeri Mr. Adarsha Hiriyannaiah Mr.Saravanan V Mr.H C Shashidhara Ms.K.A.Vishnu Priya Ms.Chaitra K S Mr.Chaitanya N S Mr.Dayananda Mr.Snehal Dev Savio Pinto Mr.R.Prakash Ms.G.Swetha Ms.Roopa K.S Ms.Vijayashree K
02.05.1971 02.01.1981 12.07.1983 23.05.1975 09.11.1981 02.02.1980 21.12.1984 14.12.1982 04.01.1986 18.07.1983 22.07.1983 09.04.1985 26.03.1982 06.01.1984 02.07.1985 09.10.1987 02.12.1987 15.04.1985 25.10.1981 15.03.1972 05.12.1985 21.07.1986 23.12.1987
Lecturer Lecturer Lecturer Lecturer Lecturer Lecturer Lecturer Lecturer Lecturer Lecturer Lecturer Lecturer Lecturer Lecturer Lecturer Lecturer Lecturer Lecturer Lecturer Lecturer Lecturer Lecturer Lecturer
M.Sc -M.Sc. -M.Sc M.Sc M.Sc M.Sc MA M.Sc M.Sc M.Te ch ME MS ME MS ---M.Te ch ---------------------------
01.09.2006 22.08.2005 05.08.2010 30.08.2007 13.08.2007 13.03.2008 20.08.2009 01.09.2010 22.09.2008 02.08.2010 06.08.2010 03.08.2009 19.07.2010 01.09.2010 04.08.2008 10.03.2010 10.03.2010 15.08.2010 07.07.2008 07.08.2007 18.09.2008 31.08.2009 23.08.2010 Date Of Joining
Evaluators Space
S.no
Ver. June 2009
Name
DOB
Designa tion
Qualifications UG PG Ph.
2011
D 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 Ms. Ranjitha.B.C. Ms.Priya Badrinath Ms.Roopa T Mr.Fairoz Pasha Mr.Krian P Ms.V.Rashmi Mr.Vivek Kumar Prasad Ms.Rinu Sara Jacob Mr.Rahu H V Mr.Sankalp Bailur Ms.Rashika Gandage 12.01.1988 10.12.1985 23.04.1978 05.01.1983 13.03.1985 07.07.1984 22.09.1981 23.05.1986 20.08.1984 26.05.1982 15.09.1981 Lecturer Lecturer Lecturer Lecturer Lecturer Lecturer Lecturer Lecturer Lecturer Lecturer Lecturer BE BE BE BE BE BE BE B.Te ch BE BE BE -M.Te ch --M.Te ch M.Te ch M.Te ch M.Te ch M.Te ch MS M.Te ch -----------29.09.2010 30.07.2010 05.01.2011 17.01.2008 14.07.2010 14.09.2009 12.07.2010 06.05.2010 26.07.2010 02.08.2010 24.07.2008
II-I.5.1 Assessment of Faculty Availability for FIRST YEAR courses in teacherstudent ratio of 1: 15 (15) Three years of data for first year courses to calculate the teacher-student ratio: Items Number of students in First Year Number of faculty teaching first year courses Teacher-student ratio Av. Teacher-student ratio (in first year courses):1:15 II-I.5.2 Assessment of Qualification (10) Assessment of Qualification = (10 * x + 6 * y + 4 * z) / N Where, X = No. of faculty members with Ph. D Y= No. of faculty members with M. E. /M. Tech Z= No. of faculty members with B. E. / B. Tech/M.Sc. /M. A. N=Total no. of faculty members Year
Ver. June 2009 Evaluators Space
CAY 840 56 1:15
CAYm1 840 56 1:15
CAYm2 840 56 1:15
FQI
Assessment
2011
CAYm2 CAYm1 CAY
11 10 13
16 17 20
27 27 33
7.62 7.48 7.57
30.48 29.92 30.36 30.25
Avg. Assessment II-I.6 Academic performance in First Year Common Courses (40) Academic Performance = 40 * FYSI Where FYSI = First Year Success Index
= (No. of students who have cleared all the subjects in a single attempt of their semester or yearend examination) / (Total no. of students admitted in the first year) Items No. of students admitted in First Year (Appeared for Exam.) No. of students who have cleared all subjects in single attempt First Year Success Index (FYSI) CAYm1 840 691 0.82 CAYm2 840 720 0.86 CAYm3 840 720 0.86
Avg. FYSI = 0.85 Academic Performance = 40 * Avg. FYSI =34
Ver. June 2009
2011
Evaluators Space
PART II Department / Programme Summary (Criteria III to VIII) D.0.1. Name and Address of the Department: Information Science and Engineering D.0.2. Name, designation, telephone numbers and e-mail id of the contact person for NBA: Prof. Shylaja S S Professor & Head, Department of Information Science and Engineering P E S Institute of Technology, Bangalore-560085. Ph: 080 26721983 (Ext:700) Mail-id: shylaja.sharath@pes.edu D.0.3. History of the Department (including dates of introduction and no. of seats of various programmes of study, which are run by the department along with NBA accreditation, if any), in tabular form: Programme of Study Description Started with 60 seats in 1998
Intake increased to 120 in 2006 UG in Information Science Accredited by NBA-AICTE in 2004 for 03 and Engineering years Accredited by NBA-AICTE in 2008 for 03 years Started with 18 seats in 2010
PG in Software Engineering
D.0.4. List the names of the Programmes/Departments which share human resources and/or the facilities of this Department/Programmes NIL D.0.5. Total No. of Students: 542 18 D.0.6. Total No. of Employee : 39 Teaching : 29 Non Teaching : 10
Ver. June 2009
Boys: 364 14 Male: 19 : 13 : 06
Girls : 178 BE ( 1 to 4 years) 04 M. Tech Female : 20 : 16 : 04

2011
Evaluators Space
D.0.7. Minimum and maximum number of faculty and staff on roll during the current and previous two academic years (1st July to 30th June) in the Department: CAY 2010-11 Min Max Teaching faculty in the Department Teaching faculty with the Programme Non-teaching staff 26 29 CAY minus 1 2009-10 Min Max 23 29 Cay minus 2 2008-09 Min Max 22 29
26 10
29 10
23 09
29 11
22 09
29 13
D.0.8. Summary of budget for the CFY and the actual expenditures incurred in the CFYm1 and CFYm2 (exclusively for this Programme in the Department) Actual expenses in CFY (till Jan 2011) (In Lakhs) 1.00 NIL 0.70 0.20 1.73 8.36 Actual Expenses in CFYm1 (In Lakhs) NIL 1.00 1.35 0.35 2.15 5.18 Actual Expenses in CFYm2 (In Lakhs) 1.00 0.75 1.10 0.40 3.00 6.00
Items
Budgeted in CFY (In Lakhs) 8.54 4.00 2.00 2.20 4.50 15.23
Laboratory equipments SW purchase Laboratory consumables Maintenance and spares Travel Miscellaneous expenses
Ver. June 2009
2011
Criterion III: Students Entry and Outputs (150) III-P.1 Students admission (10) Admission Intake 150 Items Sanctioned Intake Strength in the program No. of total admitted students in First year No. of total admitted students (including lateral entry if any), belonging to the same batch CAY 2010-11 150 124 NA CAY m1 2009-10 150 120 140 Cay m2 2008-09 150 127 145 Cay m3 2007-08 150 127 143
Evaluators Space
Admission Quality: Divide the total admitted ranks (or percentage-marks) into 5 or a few more meaningful ranges Under Graduate Intake Quality CAY CAY m1 2010-11 2009-10 Rank Range CE T CO ME DK 10 20 NIL NIL NIL Mg mt 0 3 1 2 24 CO CE ME T DK 22 04 09 03 19 04 26 NI L NI L NI L NI L Mg mt 0 1 2 3 25 CE T 14 05 05 01 10
Cay m2 2008-09 CO M DK 30 NIL NIL NIL NIL Mg mt 0 3 1 0 20
Cay m3 2007-08 CO C ME ET DK 30 15 05 02 14 29 NI L NI L NI L NI L NI L Mg mt 0 0 1 1 24
1 to 26 2,000 2,001 to 04 4,000 4,001 to 06 6,000 6,001 to 09 8,000 8,001 14 and above Admitte d NIL without rank
NIL
NIL
NI L
NIL
NI L
NIL
NI L
NI L
NIL
Ver. June 2009
2011
Evaluators Space
Post Graduate Intake Quality CAY 2010-11 PG GAT CET E 14 02 00 02 NIL 01 00 00 06 NIL CAY m1 2009-10 PG GAT CET E NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Cay m2 2008-09 PG GAT CET E NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Cay m3 2007-08 PG GAT CET E NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Rank Range
1 to 2,000 2,001 to 4,000 4,001 to 6,000 8,001 and above Admitted without rank
III-P.2 Success Rate (30) Provide data for the past 7 batches of students (Successfully completed implies Zero Backlogs) # of Students # of # of # of Admitted of Students Students Students Students in 1st successfully successfully successfully successfully year + completed completed completed completed Admitted 2nd year st rd 1 year 3 year 4th year in 2nd year (x + y) 120 140 145 145 141 141 128 96 105 101 131 129 128 118 118 113 105 86 129 103 112 97 128 129 110
Year of Entry (in reverse Chronological order)
CAY 2010-11 CAYm1 2009-10 CAYm2 2008-09 CAYm3 2006-07 CAYm4 / LYG 2005-06 CAYm5/LYGm1 2004-05 CAYm6/LYGm2 2003-04
Success Rate = 30 * Mean of Success Index (SI) for past 3 batches
Ver. June 2009
2011
Evaluators Space
SI = (No. of students who cleared the program in the minimum period of course duration) / (No. of students admitted in the first year of that batch) Items No. of students admitted in the corresponding First Year No. of students who have graduated in 4 years Success Index (SI) Av. SI = 0.94 Success Rate = 30 * Av. SI = 28.2 III-P.3 Academic performance (30) Academic Performance = 3 * API Where API = Academic Performance Index = Mean of Cumulative Grade Point Average of all the Students on a 10 point CGPA System OR = Mean of the percentage of marks of all students / 10 CAYm4 / CAYm5 / CAYm6 / Items LYG LYGm1 LYG m2 2005-06 2004-05 2003-04 Approximating the API by the following mid-point analysis # of students in 10.0 <= CGPA < 9.0 # of students in 9.0 <= CGPA < 8.0 # of students in 8.0 <= CGPA < 7.0 # of students in 7.0 <= CGPA < 6.0 # of students in 6.0 <= CGPA < 5.0 # of students in 5.0 <= CGPA < 4.0 # of students in 4.0 <= CGPA < 3.0 # of students in 3.0 <= CGPA < 2.0 # of students in 2.0 <= CGPA < 1.0 # of students in 1.0 <= CGPA < 0.0 Total Approximating API by Mid-CGPA Exact Mean of CGPA/Percentage of all the students (API)
Ver. June 2009
CAYm4 / LYG 2005-06 120 117 0.97
CAYm5 / LYGm1 2004-05 120 116 0.96
CAYm6 / LYG m2 2003-04 120 108 0.90
01 52 44 22 01 00 00 00 00 00 120 8.0 7.92
01 33 71 14 00 00 00 00 00 00 120 8.0 7.86
00 26 55 35 04 00 00 00 00 00 120 7.92 7.5

2011
Evaluators Space
Avg. API = 7.97 Academic Performance = 3 x Avg. API = 23.91 III-P.4 Placement and higher studies (40) Assessment Points = 40 * (X + 1.25 * Y) / N Where X = Number of students placed, Y = Number of students admitted for higher studies with valid qualifying scores / ranks, N = Total number of students who were admitted in the batch subject to Max. Assessment Points = 40. Items # of Admitted students corresponding to LYG (N) # of students who obtained jobs as per the record of placement office (X1) # of students who found employment otherwise at the end of the final year (X2) X = X1 + X2 Number of students who went for higher studies with valid qualifying scores/ranks (Y)** Assessment Points CAYm4 / LYG 2005-06 141+ 100* 95 CAYm5 / LYGm1 2004-05 141+ 100* 100 CAYm6 / LYG m2 2003-04 128+ 105* 100
35 130 14 41.84
38 138 12 43.40
27 127 13 44.76
Note: * Indicate students eligible for placements during 6th semester +Includes Lateral Entry + PIO Quota Students. ** Data is from the alumni students. Avg. Assessment Points = 43.33 == 40
III-P.5 Professional Activities (20) Provide data for the past 3 years CAY, CAYm1 and CAYm2 Refer Annexure 2
2011
Evaluators Space
III-P.5.1 Professional societies/ chapters and organizing engineering events (4) Refer Annexure 2 Table 2.1
III-P.5.2 Organization of paper contests, design contests etc. and their achievements (4) Refer Annexure 2 Table 2.2
III-P.5.3 Publication of technical magazines, newsletters etc. (4) Refer Annexure 2 Table 2.3
III-P.5.4 Entrepreneurship initiatives, product designs, innovations (4) Specify the efforts and achievements Refer Annexure 2 Table 2.4
III-P.5.5 Publications and awards in inter institute events by students of the programme of study (4) Refer Annexure 2 Table 2.5
Include a Table having those publications, which fetch awards by students in the events/conferences organized by other institutes. Include a tabulated list of all other student publications in a separate annexure. Refer Annexure 2 Table 2.6
III-P.6 Students Projects Quality (20) Include list of five best and average projects each, taken each from three years CAY, CAYm1 and CAYm2 along with their contributions Refer Annexure 3
Ver. June 2009
2011
Evaluators Space
Criterion IV: Faculty Contributions List of Department Faculty : Exclusively for the Program / Shared with other Programs No. of research # of publications in curren journals and tR& conferences D and since joining consul the tancy department projec and Total no. ts and of such the publications amou nt nJ nC NJ NC
Name of the Faculty
Design Qualificat ation ion, (admin Universit istrativ y and e year of positio graduatio ns, if n any,)
Areas of Specializ ation
Date of joining the dept; Load sharing with more than one program s
Refer Annexure 4
IV-P.1 Teacher Student ratio (20) Assessment Where TSR = Teacher Student Ratio = (x + y + z) / N subject to Max. TSR = 15; Where x y z N = No. of students in 2nd year of the program = No. of students in 3rd year of the program = No. of students in 4th year of the program = Total No. Faculty Members in the program = 20 * TSR / 15
Year CAY m2 2008-09 CAY m1 2009-10 CAY 2010-11
x 145 156 139
y 146 142 133
z 144 153 141
x+y+z 435 451 421
N 29 29 29
TSR 15 15 14.24
Assessment 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00
Avg. Assessment
Ver. June 2009
2011
Evaluators Space
IV-P.2 Cadre ratio (20) Assessment = 20 * CRI Where CRI, Cadre Ratio Index = 2.25 ( 2x + y ) / N subject to Max. CRI = 1.0; Where x = No. of professors in the program y = No. of associate professors / readers in the program N = Total No. Faculty Members in the program
Year CAY m2 2008-09 CAY m1 2009-10 CAY 2010-11
x 04 05 04
y 00 00 01
N 29 29 29
CRI 0.62 0.78 0.70
Assessment 12.40 15.60 14.00 14.00
Avg. Assessment
IV-P.3 Faculty qualifications (40) Assessment = 4 * FQI Where FQI = Faculty Qualification Index = (10 * x + 6 * y + 4 * z) / N Where x = No. of Faculty Members with Ph. D in Engineering y = No. of Faculty Members with M. E / M. Tech z = No. of Faculty Members with B. E / B. Tech N = Total No. Faculty Members Year CAY m2 2008-09 CAY m1 2009-10 CAY 2010-11 x 04 04 03 y 15 10 19 z 10 15 07 x+y+z 29 29 29 N 29 29 29 FQI 5.86 5.51 5.93 Assessment 23.44 22.04 23.72 23.06
Avg. Assessment
Ver. June 2009
2011
Evaluators Space
IV-P.4 Faculty retention (20) Assessment = 4 * RPI / N Where RPI = Retention Point Index = Points assigned to all Faculty Where Points assigned to a faculty = 1 point for each year of experience at the Institute but not exceeding 5. N = Total No. of Faculty Members Item # of faculty with less than 1y (x0) # of faculty with 1y <= period < 2y (x1) # of faculty with 2y <= period < 3y (x2) # of faculty with 3y <= period < 4y (x3) # of faculty with 4y <= period < 5y (x4) # of faculty with more than 5 y (x5) N RPI = x1 + 2x2 + 3x3 + 4x4 +5x5 Assessment CAY m2 2008-09 00 08 12 09 20 10 29 189 26.06 CAY m1 2009-10 00 01 12 18 12 15 29 202 27.86 Avg. Assessment CAY 2010-11 00 00 00 18 20 20 29 234 32.27 28.73
IV-P.5 Research publications and IPR (20) Faculty Points in Publications and IPR (FPPR) = Assessment of Publications + Assessment of IPR Assessment of Publications = 3 * Sum of the Research points scored by each Faculty member / No. of sanctioned positions of Professors and Readers Assessment of IPR = Sum of the IPR points scored by each Faculty member / No. of sanctioned positions of Professors and Readers Note: A faculty member scores at the most 5 Research points depending upon the quality of the research papers published in the past 3 years. For this research papers considered are those (i) which can be located on Internet and/or are included in hard-copy volumes/proceedings, published by a well known publishing house, and (ii) the faculty member's affiliation, in the published paper, is the one of the same college/institute. For multiple authors, every author of the same college will earn the points.
2011
Evaluators Space
Similarly, a faculty member scores 1 point for each IPR subject to a maximum of 5 points. Include a list of all such publications along with details of DOI, publisher, month/year, etc.
Name of faculty (contributing to FPPR) Dr. K. N. Balasubramanya Murthy Prof. S S Shylaja Dr. Suthikshn Kumar Dr. Srikanta Murthy K Dr. S Natarajan Mr. Narendra UP Ms. Jayashree R N (Min. N is 3) (excluding Asstt Prof.) Assessment FPPR = (Sum/N)
CAY m2 2008-09 Pub Points (x) 03 03 03 05 01 01 01 IPR Points (y) 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Sum 03 17 Pub + IPR Points (3x +y) 09 09 09 15 03 03 03 51
Name of faculty (contributing to FPPR) Dr. K. N. Balasubramanya Murthy Prof. S S Shylaja Dr. Suthikshn Kumar Dr. Srikanta Murthy K Dr. S Natarajan N (Min. N is 3) (excluding Asstt Prof.) Assessment FPPR = (Sum/N)
CAY m1 2009-10 Pub Points (x) 02 02 04 01 05 IPR Points (y) 00 00 00 00 00 Sum 03 14 Pub + IPR Points (3x +y) 06 06 12 03 15 42
Ver. June 2009
2011
Evaluators Space
Name of faculty (contributing to FPPR) Dr. K. N. Balasubramanya Murthy Prof. S S Shylaja Dr. Suthikshn Kumar Dr. S Natarajan Ms. Ganga Holi Ms. Sangeetha J Mr. Vinay A Mr. Devaraj Verma C Mr. Dheeraj D Ms. Sharmila Chidaravalli Ms. P Rama Devi Ms Chaitali Choudhary N (Min. N is 3) (excluding Asstt Prof.) Assessment FPPR = (Sum/N) Avg. Assessment FPPR = 20.00
CAY 2010-11 Pub Points (x) 05 05 01 05 04 02 04 01 01 02 01 01 IPR Points (y) 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Sum 03 32.33 Pub + IPR Points (3x +y) 15 15 03 15 12 06 12 03 03 06 03 03 97
Refer Annexure 5 Faculty Publication Details
IV-P.6 Externally funded R & D projects and consultancy work (20) Assessment of R&D & Consultancy Projects = 4 * Sum of FPPC by each faculty / No. of sanctioned positions of Professors and Readers Where FPPC = Faculty Points in Projects and Consultancy Note: A faculty member gets at the most 5 points depending upon the amount of externally funded R & D project and/or consultancy work. For multiple faculty members involved in a single project, every faculty member will earn the points, depending on the funding agency as given below: 5 points for funding by National Agency, 4 points for funding by State Agency, 3 points for funding by private sector, and 2 points for funding by the sponsoring Trust/Society. Points to be awarded, if the total fund available for a project is of minimal one lakh rupees in the CFY.
Ver. June 2009
2011
Evaluators Space
Name of faculty (contributing to FPPC) Dr. K N Balasubramanya Murthy Prof. Shylaja S S Dr. K Srikanta Murthy Ms. Ganga Holi Mr. Karthik S Sum N (Min. N is 3) (excluding Asstt Prof.) Assessment FPPC = 4 x Sum/N
CAY m2 2008-09 5 3 5 3 3 19 3 25.33
FPPC Points CAY m1 2009-10 NIL NIL 3 NIL NIL 3 3 4 Avg. Assessment
CAY 2010-11 NIL NIL NIL NIL NIL NIL 3 NIL 9.77
Refer Annexure 6 Faculty R & D, Consultancy Details
IV-P.7 Interactions of faculty members with outside world (10) Assessment of Interaction = 2 * Sum of IP by each faculty / No. of sanctioned positions of Professors and Readers Where IP = Interaction points scored by each faculty member Note: A faculty member gets at the most 5 Interaction Points depending upon the type of Institution or R&D Lab or Industry. Only those interactions will be considered who have resulted in joint quality publication, R& D projects and/or consultancy. The points earned by each faculty shall be decided as given below: 5 points for interaction with a well known Institute/University abroad, 4 points for interaction with Institute of Eminence in India or National Research Labs, 3 points for interaction with University / Industry in India and Institute/University (not covered) above 2 points for interaction with State Level Institutions, and 1 point for interaction with private affiliated Institutions. Point to be awarded, are for those activities, which result in joint efforts in publication of books/research paper, pursuing externally funded R & D projects and/or development of semester-long course/teaching modules.
Ver. June 2009
2011
Evaluators Space
Name of faculty (contributing to IP) Dr. K. N. Balasubramanya Murthy Dr. SrikantaMurthy K Prof. S S Shylaja Dr. Suthikshn Kumar Dr. S Natarajan Ms. Ganaga Holi Ms. Sangeetha J Mr. Karthik S Ms. Ambika T Mr. Vinay A Ms. Parimala R Mr. Devraj Verma C Mr. Dheeraj Ms. RamaDevi Ms. Chitali Chowdry Assessment FPPC =2 x Sum/N
CAY m2 2008-09 05 05 05 05 05 03 NIL 03 03 01 NIL NA NA NA NA 23.33
IP Points CAY m1 2009-10 05 NIL 05 05 05 03 04 03 NIL 03 02 NA NA NA NA 23.33 Avg. Assessment
CAY 2010-11* 05 NIL 05 05 05 05 NIL NIL 03 05 NIL 01 02 02 02 20.00 22.22
* Activities ongoing in CAY
Ver. June 2009
2011
Evaluators Space
Criterion V: Facilities and Technical Support Description of Class rooms, faculty rooms, seminar and conference halls Room Description Usage Shared / Capacity Exclusive Refer Annexure 7 V-P.1 Class rooms in the department (15) Rooms Equipped with
V-P.1.1 Enough rooms for lectures (core/electives), seminars, tutorials, etc for the program (5) Assessment based on the information provided in the above table V-P.1.2 Teaching aids black/white-board, multimedia projectors, etc. (5) Assessment based on the information provided in the above table
V-P.1.3 Acoustics, class room size, conditions of chairs/benches, air circulation, lighting, exits, ambiance, etc. (5) Assessment based on the information provided in the above table and the inspection thereof
V-P.2 Faculty rooms in the department (15) V-P.2.1 Availability of individual faculty rooms (5) Assessment based on the information provided in the above table
V-P.2.2 Room equipped with white/black board, computer, internet, etc. (5) Assessment based on the information provided in the above table
V-P.2.3 Usage of room for discussion/counseling with students (5) Assessment based on the information provided in the above table and the inspection thereof
Ver. June 2009
2011
Evaluators Space
V-P.3 Laboratories in the department to meet the curriculum requirements as well as the PEOs (25) Space/ Quality Exclusive # of Curriculum Lab # of Lab use/ experimen Description Studen instrume manuals Shared? ts ts nts Data Structures Lab 80 12 Digital Design Lab OOP with C++ Lab Analysis & Design of Algorithms Lab System Software Lab Operating Systems Lab Web Technologies Lab Object Oriented Analysis and Design Lab Mobile Computing Lab OOP using Java Lab Microcontroller Lab Exclusive 80 75 80 80 75 75 80 80 80 75 12 12 12 06 + 1 Mini Project 12 12 10 + 2 Mini Projects 12 12 12 Good Available
Computer Networks Lab 80 12 Unix System 80 12 Programming Lab Advanced Java 80 12 Programming Lab Note: Same physical space is used for conducting different labs. V-P.3.1 Enough labs to run all the program specific curriculum (10) Assessment based on the information provided in the above table V-P.3.2 Availability of computing facilities available exclusively in the department (5) Assessment based on the information provided in the above table V-P.3.3 Availability of labs with tech. support within and beyond working hours (5) Assessment based on the information provided in the above table V-P.3.4 Equipments to run experiments and their maintenance, Number of students per experimental set up, Size of the laboratories, overall ambience etc. (5) Assessment based on the information provided in the above table
2011
Evaluators Space
V-P.4.1 Availability of adequate and qualified technical supporting staff for program specific labs (10) Name of the Technical Staff Exclu sive Designation /Shar (Pay-scale) ed Work ? Programmer Basic: 6680/Gross: 12475/Date of Joini ng Qualification At Joini ng Other Techni cal Skills gained? Hardwa re Trouble Shootin g and Networ king
Responsibility
Now
N Ajay Pokale
02112000
B.SC
B.SC
Assist with analysis, maintenance, and installation of software Aid in fixing computer problems, contacting those who can remedy computer problems when unable to do so and tracking computer operations on a daily basis.
Y.Raviku mar
Computer Operator Basic: 4500/Gross: 8306/-
14102005
ITI
ITI
Hardwa re Trouble Shootin g and Networ king
T. Madhusudh an
System Analyst Basic 4300/Gross 7942/-
Exclu sive 15042008 B.Co m B.Co m
Utilization of computing facility in lab conduction
S.Ramesh Babu
Lab Assistant Basic:2300/ Gross:4319/ -
03032006
Diplo Diplo ma in ma in Elect Electr ronic onics s
Strictly monitor access to the lab; allowing access only to students having an ID card, Monitor the lab, keeping an eye out for theft, disruptions of any kind, and the proper functioning of the lab equipment
Ver. June 2009
2011
Evaluators Space
V-P.4.2 Incentives, skill-up gradation and professional advancement (10)
Details of training undergone by the technical staff Name of the Technical Staff Mr. N Ajay Pokale Workshop Attended Workshop on Hardware Trouble Shooting and Networking Workshop on EVidya Streaming Systems Workshop on Ubuntu Workshop on Hardware Trouble Shooting and Networking Date 05th 08th July, 2010 Organization / Institution RNS Institute of Technology M. S. Ramaiah Institute of Technology R V College of Engineering RNS Institute of Technology
Mr. Y. RaviKumar Mr T. Madhusudhan Mr. S. Ramesh Babu
2 Dec, 2009 18th 20th Jan, 2010 05th 08th July, 2010
nd
Ver. June 2009
2011
Evaluators Space
Criterion VI: Continuous Improvements VI-P.1 Improvement in Success Index of students (10) From III-P.2 Items Success Index LYG 2005-06 0.97 LYGm1 2004-05 0.96 LYG m2 2003-04 0.90
VI-P.2 Improvement in academic performance of students (10) From III-P.3 Items API LYG 2005-06 7.92 LYGm1 2004-05 7.86 LYG m2 2003-04 7.5
VI-P.3 Enhancement of faculty qualifications and retention (15) From IV-P.3 and IV-P.4 Items FQI RPI CAY 2010-11 5.93 234 CAY m1 2009-10 5.51 202 CAY m2 2008-09 5.86 189
VI-P.4 Improvement in Faculty activities in research publication, R & D work and consultancy, and interaction (15) From IV-P.5 and IV-P.6 Items FPPR FPPC IP SUM CAY 2010-11 32.33 * 20 52.33 CAY m1 2009-10 14 4.0 23.33 41.33 CAY m2 2008-09 17 25.33 23.33 65.66
Note: * Proposal submitted to AICTE

2011
Evaluators Space
VI-P.5 Continuing education (10)
Specify the contributory efforts made by the faculty by developing the course/lab modules and conducting short-term courses/workshops etc. for continuing education:
Module Descriptio n
Any other contributory Inst./Industr y
Developed/ organized by
Duratio n
Resourc e Persons
Target Audienc e
Usages and citation etc.
Refer Annexure 8 (Table 8.1)
VI-P.6 New facility created (10) Specify the new facility created to strengthening the curriculum and/or to meet the PEOs: Module Descriptio n Any other contributory Inst./Industr y Developed/ organized by Resourc e Persons Target Audienc e Usages and citation etc.
Duratio n
In CAY m2 2008-09 In CAY m1 2009-10 In CAY 2010-11 Refer Annexure 8 (Table 8. 2)
VI-P.7 Overall improvements (5) Specify the overall successive improvements in curriculum and others: Specify the improveme nt Improvemen t brought in Contributed by List of PEO(s), which are strengthened
Comments, if any
In CAY m2 2008-09 In CAY m1 2009-10 In CAY 2010-11 Refer Annexure 9
Ver. June 2009
2011
Evaluators Space
Criterion VII: Curriculum List all the course modules along with their objectives and outcomes (in Part III): Units PEOs Additional Science/HSS/ specified theory/lab/ Professional by assignments/ Core, Affiliating Comments tests needed Elective Univ. or to meet or Breadth? the objectives? College? Refer Annexure 10
Course Theory Lab
VII-P.1 Contents of basic sciences, HSS, professional core and electives, and breadth (40) Assessment is based on the balanced composition of basic sciences, HSS, professional core and electives, and breadth to meet the PEOs. If such components are not included in the curriculum provided by the affiliated university, then the college/Inst. should make additional efforts to impart such knowledge through covering such aspects through contents beyond syllabi.
VII-P.2 Emphasis on laboratory and project work (30) Assessment is based on the balanced laboratory and project work along with theory, to meet the PEOs. If enough lab/design/experimentation components are not included in the curriculum provided by the affiliated university, then the college/Inst. should make additional efforts to impart such knowledge through covering such aspects through contents beyond syllabi.
VII-P.3 Curriculum updates and PEO reviews (30) List of course modules (along with coverage beyond syllabus) and PEOs which were updated and revised in past 3 years by the college, irrespective of curriculum updates by the affiliating university, in order to meet the corresponding PEOs
VII-P.4 Additional contents to bridge curriculum gaps (25)
Assessment is based on program specific contents which are added to bridge curriculum gaps across the courses in order to achieve PEOs and the specific course objectives
2011
Evaluators Space
Criterion VIII: Program Educational Objectives Their Compliance and Outcomes List all the course modules along with their PEOs (in Part III): Units Quality of PEOs specified? (Poor / Avg / Good / Excellent) Additional contents to meet objectives? Assessment through Course files/Lab and assignment sheets/Test papers
Course Theory Lab
Theory Lab
Assignments/ Tests
Refer Annexure 11
VIII-P.1 Course objective and mapping (20) Assessment is based on the PEOs defined for a course or a set of courses and their mapping with the content delivery and knowledge gain through theory classes, lab experiments, assignments and tests. Refer Annexure 12 VIII-P.2 Assessment outcomes (20) Assessment is based on the feasibility, applicability and quality of the PEOs with the course delivery. Assessment is also based on the methodologies for outcome measurements from the stake-holders including industry, alumni, and professional bodies. VIII-P.3 Mapping with faculty expertise (20) Units Area of specialization needed to achieve PEOs specified by Name of the faculty whose expertise matched with the specialization
Course Theory Lab
Comments
Refer Annexure 13
Assessment is based on the factor that the expertise needed to deliver the contents is met with the faculty expertise and on a balanced load factor of the concerned faculty. Faculty expertise should be adequate to cater for all the major fields specified in the program criteria.
2011
Evaluators Space
VIII-P.4 Mapping with outcomes (20) Assessment is based on what extent the PEOs/curriculum map with the outcomes. Refer Annexure 12
VIII-P.5 Significant achievements (20) List significant achievements, in respect of curriculum, stated PEOs and their outcomes, in CAY, CAYm1 and CAYm2.
Items Results Placements Publications Internships Higher Studies * Indicates ongoing activities
CAY 2010-11 96% (Till 7th Semester)* 92%* 16 90%* 14*
CAY m1 2009-10 99% 99% 06 20% 12
CAY m2 2008-09 98% 99% 04 22% 13
Ver. June 2009
2011
Evaluators Space
PART III CURRICULUM, SYLLABI, PEOS AND OUTCOMES 1. Programme Educational Objectives & Course Objectives Refer Annexure 13 2. Program and Course Outcomes
Refer Annexure 13
3. Mapping PEOS with expected outcomes Refer Annexure 12 4. Additional contents beyond the syllabi, if needed, to be provided to meet the outcomes with the course objectives. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Preplacement Training Training on Soft skills Creative / Hobby Projects Guest lectures Finishing School
5. How to make provisions for the additional contents, if needed to bridge the gaps, in the academic calendar. Free slots in time table for 1,2, 3 and 5 and lecture class for 4.
Refer Annexure 14
Ver. June 2009
2011
P E S INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION SCIENCE & ENGINEERING ANNEXURE 1
Ver. June 2009
2011
P E S INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION SCIENCE & ENGINEERING ANNEXURE 2 Table 2.1. Professional societies/ chapters and organizing engineering events Events Professional Society / Chapters Professional Membership (IEEE / CSI/ ISTE/ ACM) Engineering Events Society 15 05 05 CAY 2010-11 01 CAY m1 2009-10 NIL CAY m2 2008-09 NIL
10
09
06
Table 2.2. Organization of paper contests, design contests etc. and their achievements Events Organization of paper contests Design contests Extended Week Day * CAY 2010-11 01 01 09 CAY m1 2009-10 NIL 02 10 CAY m2 2008-09 NIL NIL NIL
Table 2.3. Publication of technical magazines, newsletters etc. Publication Technical magazines CAY 2010-11 NA CAY m1 2009-10 NA CAY m2 2008-09 NA
Technical / Literary magazines
01
01
01
Newsletters
02
02
02
Ver. June 2009
2011
Table 2.4. Entrepreneurship initiatives, product designs, innovations Specify the efforts and achievements Events Entrepreneurship initiatives Product Design Innovations CAY 2010-11 01 NIL 02 CAY m1 2009-10 01 NIL NIL CAY m2 2008-09 NIL NIL NIL
Table 2.5. Publications and awards in inter institute events by students of the programme of study (4) Events Publication Award CAY 2010-11 01 (ACM Best Paper Award) CAY m1 2009-10 01 (IEEE Best Paper Award) CAY m2 2008-09 01 (HP Best Paper Award)
Table 2.6. Student Publication Details Sl No. Name of the student Details of the Conference /Journal International Conference on Computer Graphics, Imaging and Visualization Guide Name with affiliation
Title of the paper Algorithmic Approach for prediction and early detection of disease using retinal images Near Duplicate Image Detection And Classification
1.
Raghu Raj P
2.
3.
Manish Kumar, International Conference on Prajwal B S, Content Based Image Mahesh Raju S Retrieval R International Conference on Pritha D N, Computer and Automation Savitha L Engineering Pritha D N, Savitha L First International Conference on Integrated Intelligent Computing
Prof. Shylaja SS
4.
Face Recognition Using Trichotomic Combination of SVD, DF-LDA and LPP Face Recognition by feed forward Neural Network by Laplacian of Gaussian filter & Singular Value Decomposition
Ver. June 2009
2011
Sl No.
5.
Name of the student
Details of the Conference /Journal Cutting Edge Technologies
Guide Name with affiliation
Title of the paper Feature Extraction and Compression of face image using Gabor Filters Efficient Retrieval of Face Images on Curvelet and Singular Value Decomposition Aggregation of Gabor Wavelets and Curvelet with PCA for Efficient Retrieval of Face Images Face Detection in Color Images using Skin Color, LOG filter and Euler Number Comparative Analysis of Color Layout Descriptor & Edge Histogram Descriptor Dimensionality Reduction using Gaussian Mixture Model-An Application to Face Recognition A Simple and Effective technique to enhance the degraded document using signal valued decomposition and Adaptive thresholding Degraded document Image Enhancement using singular Valued Decomposition
6.
Abhijit K G, Jayashree D, Mohd. Saifulla S
International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies Amrita ACM-W Celebration of Women in Computing
7.
8.
9.
10.
Ramya S, Radhika S, Nikita John, Prateek Rao Akshatha Udupa, Kusuma S Akshatha Patil, Garima Srivastava, Geethu Babu Nitin N, Pavan Kulkarni, & Suman Bharadwaj Nitin N, Pavan Kulkarni, & Suman Bharadwaj Riddhi J Shah, Sandhya B, Swati D V Saurabh Kumar, Priyanka Chandra, Shishir Kaushik, Zeeshan Ahmad
Ver. June 2009
2nd International Conference on Digital Image Proceedings in Singapore on 26th February, 2010 National Conference on Intelligent Information Retrieval National Conference on Intelligent Information Retrieval 16the Korea- Japan, Joint Workshop on Frontiers of Computer Vision, FCV2010, held at Hiroshima, Japan (proceedings: pp-5056) Recent Research Trend on Advanced Computing RTAC- 2010, held at Madurai, India Published in Proceedings ICDIP- 2010, International Conference on Digital Image Proceeding held in Raome, Italy, April 2010
Prof. Shylaja SS
11.
12.
Ms. Ganga Holi
13.
Application of Morphological operations on degraded Historical Document Image for Image Enhancement
14.
Knowledge USTAV- 2010, National Conference held at SBMJCE, Bangalore
Interactive Shell
2011
Sl No.
Name of the student Prateek Saxena, Shikhar Chandra Abhijit K G, Jayashree D, Mohd. Saifulla S
Details of the Conference /Journal IEEE International Conference on Communication Control and Computing Technologies IEEE International Conference on Computer Engineering and Technology, Jhodpur Fourth IEEE International Conference on Internet Multimedia Systems Architecture and Applications (IMSAA-10), Bangalore National Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering Technology and Applications, Bangalore.
Guide Name with affiliation
Title of the paper Bandwidth Aware Load Balancing and Optimal bandwidth Allocation Techniques for Video-onDemand System A Novel Framework for Distributed Dynamic Load Balancing in Video-onDemand Systems
15.
16.
17.
Prateek Saxena
Mr. Vinay. A
Architectural Solution for Improving Performance of Video-on-Demand Systems RADLBS: A Resource Aware Dynamic Load Balancing Strategy for Video-onDemand Systems An Optimal Video Replication Framework for Video-on-Demand Systems Making Use thread pool to improve UTMPD performance Innovative approach to secure computing systems in networks using windows registry without cost Innovative approach to secure computing systems in networks using windows registry
18.
Prateek Saxena, Shikhar Chandra Abhinav Prakash Naveen B K Raghavendra N.B, Rakshith R Babu, Siddarth .M
19.
20.
HP Technical Paper Contest 2nd State level technical student paper presentation, SJBIT college, Bangalore060 16th October 2008 International Conference on Future Networks (ICFN09), Bangkok (7-9 march 2009), ThailandIEEE-CPS proceedings, ICFN proceedings First National Conference on Cryptography and Network Security (NCCNS), Vellore Institute of Technology (18-19 Feb 2009), Tamilnadu- VIT conference proceedings
21.
NIL
22.
Raghavendra N.B
NIL
23.
Raghavendra N.B, Rakshith R Babu, Siddarth .M
NIL
An innovative approach to secure computing systems from worms, viruses
Ver. June 2009
2011
Sl No.
24.
Name of the student Arathi .P & Poornima K S Akshatha Udupa, Ranjitha C Rahul Bansal
Details of the Conference /Journal CSI Chapter Bangalore
Guide Name with affiliation NIL
Title of the paper Improving end to end availability of overlay networks Minimization Approach of Assignment Technique to solbe a Transpiration Problem Part of Team Aidra Second Position for best concept car
25.
APORS- 2009 Relio Quick Auto Mall
NIL NIL
26.
Ver. June 2009
2011
P E S INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION SCIENCE & ENGINEERING ANNEXURE 3 Table 3.1 Best Projects CAY Name of the Student(s) Project Title Areas of Specializat ion Project Supervisor (s) Contribution/ Achievements / Research Output Matchi ng Publi with the cation stated PEOs
Project Work under Progress CAY m1 Mr. Gopala Krishna A Mr. Karthik N S Mr. Vignesh Chandramouli Mr. Vatsal Singahal Ms. Shruthi Nayak Ms. Swathi Shenoy Ms. Eshitha H K Kenneth T Moras Mr. Abhihek Sharma Ajith Raj Shetty Ms. Chethana V P Mr. Rachit Sood Mr. Vinod Kumar Mr. Sandeep Mehta Mr. Patel Kartik iRover- an iPhone Controlled wifi rover Mobile Communic ation Nagasundari S Interactive Learning Environmen t HCI Jayashree R Award of BE degree YES NO MuNIP An OMR System Research Work & Award of BE degree
Image Processing
Prof. Shylaja SS
YES
Code Morphing
Compiler Design
Dr. Suthishn Kumar
Ver. June 2009
2011
Name of The Student(s) Mr. Nandish M Ms. Nasika S Bilkhis Ms. Neetha Bali B Mr. Kushal S Mr. Lohit Kumar AP Ms. Akshatha Rao Ms. Aruna S Ms. Ashwini B Ms. Rhea Muddaiah Mr. Ravikiran S Mr. Sandeep B S Mr. Vikas K J Mr. Vishwanath Sridhar Bhat Ms. Roshni R Ms. Sahana Reddy G Ms. Greeshma O G Ms. Deepti Dandin Ms. Mamata Hegde
Project Title
Areas of Specializat ion
Project Supervisor (s)
Contribution/ Achievements / Research Output
Matchi ng Publi with the cation stated PEOs
Sonic Barcodes for Visually Impaired
Artificial Intelligence
Ambika T
Award of BE degree
YES
NO
CAY m2 Location Based Information Retrieval Google Map Search on Mobile Phone Image Processing Prof. Shylaja SS
Mobile Computing
Dr. Suthishn Kumar
Document Parser And Text Extractor
Compiler Design
UP Narendra
Award of BE degree
YES
NO
Content Information Managemen Systems t System Context Based Advertisem ent
UP Narendra
Information Systems
Parimala R
Ver. June 2009
2011
Table 3.2 Average Projects CAY Project Work under Progress CAY m1 Name of the Student(s) Mr. Girish R G Mr. Mithun Manjunath Ms. Divya Arathi Madhiazhagan Ms. Harshitha L Pathi Ms. Upasana Bahl Integrated Software Suite for PESIT Surveillanc e Camera Synchroniz ation with Motion Sensor and notification server Informati on Systems Prof. Shylaja S S Project Title Areas of Specializ ation Project Supervisor (s) Contribution/ Achievements / Research Output Matchi ng with the stated PEOs
Public ation
Ms. Tamara Kallivelil
Image Processin g
Prof. Shylaja S S
Mr. Shenoy Chetan Ms. Sindhuja Gopal Ms. Suguna Kamath Mr. Yogesh Puneeth Mr. Rahul S Mr. Ryan Dsouza Ms. Sahithya B Ms. Sangeeta S Mr. Kiran Kumar RG Mr. Siddarth M Mr. Raghavendra N B
Ver. June 2009
Speech Recognitio n
Speech Recogniti on
Dr. S Natarajan
Award of BE Degree
YES
NO
Automated Attendance Systems Using RFID Theft Alert And Vehicle Tracking Using RFID
RFID
Ganga Holi
RFID
A Vinay
2011
CAY m2 Name of the Student(s) Mr. Rahul M V Ms. Rashmi Naganur Ms. Smita Verma Mr. Sujay S Mr. Aman Kumar Mr. Abhishek Kapoor Mr. Abhishek Kodankiri Mr. Ashrith Mr. Kaushik C Mr. Praveena N Shanubhogue Mr. Karthik Kumar M Mr. Abhishek Narian Ms. Aastha Bhartia Mr. Chethan .R Noise Reduction Using Fuzzy Logic for Images RTOS on dPIC Embedded Systems Game Developme nt using Direct X Scrum Project Manageme nt Tool Face Detection Image Processing Prof. Shylaja SS Project Title Areas of Specializat ion Project Supervisor (s) Contribution/ Achievements / Research Output Matchi ng with the stated PEOs Public ation
Image Processing
Dr. S Natarajan Award of BE Degree
YES
NO
Embedded Systems
Dr. S Natarajan
Computer Graphics
Dr. S Natarajan
Project Manageme nt
Dr. K Srikanta Murthy
Ver. June 2009
2011
P E S INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION SCIENCE & ENGINEERING ANNEXURE 4 Faculty Details Date of joining the dept; Load sharing with more than one program s 18.08.20 05 No. of research # of publications in curren journals and tR& conferences D and since joining consul the tancy department projec and Total no. ts and of such the publications amou nt nJ, nC NJ, NC 0 0 1 11 NIL
Name of the Faculty
Designati on (administ rativ e positions, if any,)
Qualificat ion, Universit y and year of graduatio n
Areas of Specializ ation
Dr. K N Balasubraman ya Murthy
Professor (Principal & Director)
BE MTech Ph. D BE: 1989 BU M Tech1993 VTU DOEACC C Level 2000 (Ph.D) BE 1989 BU ME 1991 IIT, Chennai Ph.D 2000 Melbourn e
Parallel Algorith ms
Prof. Shylaja SS
Professor (Head of the Departme nt)
Industrial Electroni cs
04.12.19 99
13
NIL
Dr. Suthikshn Kumar
Professor
Reconfig urable Neuro Computer s
22.11.20 05
NIL
Ver. June 2009
2011
Name of the Faculty Qualifica Designatio tion, n Universit (administr y and ativ e year of positions, graduati if any,) on
Areas of Specializa tion
No. of research # of publications in curren journals and tR& conferences D and since joining consul the tancy department projec and Total no. ts and of such the publications amou nt
nJ, nC NJ, NC
Dr. S. Natarajan
Professor
Ms. Ganga Holi
Associate Professor
Ms. Mamatha H R
Assistant Professor
Ms. M.V.Padmas ri
Assistant Professor
Ms. Sangeetha J
Assistant Professor
BSc 1964 Mysore Universit y ME 1966 Bangalor e Universit y Ph.D JNTU BE: 1994 GUG M Tech :2001 VTU (Ph.D) BE 1998 Kuvempu M Tech 2006 VTU (Ph.D) BE 1988 BU MS 1992 Georgia State BE: 2000 ME: 2006 BU (Ph.D)
Remote Sensing
11.08.200 6
18
NIL
Computer Science & Engineerin g
18.02.200 6
NIL
Computer Network Engineerin g Computer Science & Engineerin g
20.02.200 6
NIL
19-022005
NIL
Mr. C O Prakash
Senior Lecturer
Computer Science & Engineerin g Computer BE: 2000 Science & ME: 2006 Engineerin BU g
23.07.200 7
NIL
02.08.201 0
NIL
Ver. June 2009
2011
Name of the Faculty
Qualificat Designation ion, (administra University Areas of tiv e and year Specializa positions, if of tion any,) graduatio n
No. of research # of publications in curren journals and tR& conferences D and since joining consul the tancy department projec and Total no. ts and of such the publications amou nt nJ, nC NJ, NC
Mr. Karthik .S
Senior Lecturer
Ms. Ambika T
Lecturer
BE:2004 M Tech : 2007 VTU (Ph.D) BE:2005 M Tech2009 VTU BE : 2004 VTU (M.Tech)
Computer Science & Engineeri ng Computer Science & Engineeri ng Computer Science & Engineeri ng Informatio n Science & Engineeri ng Computer Network Engineeri ng Computer Science & Engineeri ng Computer Science & Engineeri ng Software Engineeri ng
07.02.200 7
NIL
14.08.200 6
NIL
Ms. Sumathi M
Lecturer
29.03.200 7
NIL
Ms. Vijayakala
Lecturer
B E: 2004 VTU
05.07.200 7
NIL
Ms. Pallavi C.V
Lecturer
BE: M Tech B E: 2007 VTU (MTech) B E: 2004 VTU BE:2007 M Tech : 2009 VTU
NIL
Mr. Vinay A
Lecturer
23.07.200 7
NIL
Ms. Parimala R
Lecturer
27.07.200 7
NIL
Mr. Dinesh HA
Lecturer
17.03.201 0
NIL
Ver. June 2009
2011
Name of the Faculty
Qualificat Designation ion, (administra University Areas of tiv e and year Specializa positions, if of tion any,) graduatio n
No. of research # of publications in curren journals and tR& conferences D and since joining consul the tancy department projec and Total no. ts and of such the publications amou nt nJ, nC NJ, NC 0 1 1 0 NIL
Mr. Devaraj Verma C
Lecturer
Mr. Dheeraj D Mr. Vinayaka S P
Lecturer
BE: 2004 M Tech: 2007 VTU B. E : 2007 VTU (MTech) B. E, MTech
Lecturer
Ms. Usha D
Lecturer
BE: 2007 VTU (ME) BE: 2008 VTU (ME) BE: 2004 M Tech 2007 VTU B. Tech :2004 M Tech : 2009 JNTU BE: 2005 (GGDU) M Tech :2009 (CSVTU)
Ms Mala Shree S
Lecturer
Computer Science & Engineeri ng Computer Science & Engineerin g Computer Science & Engineerin g Informatio n Science & Engineerin g Computer Science & Engineerin g
01.07.201 0
01.07.201 0
NIL
16.07.201 0
NIL
22.07.201 0
NIL
22.07.201 0
NIL
Ms. Sharmila Chidaravalli
Lecturer
Computer Science & 26.07.201 Engineerin 0 g Computer Science & 02.08.201 Engineerin 0 g Computer Science & 05.08.201 Engineerin 0 g
NIL
Ms. P Rama Devi
Lecturer
NIL
Ms Chaitali Choudhary
Ver. June 2009
Lecturer
NIL
2011
Name of the Faculty
Designation (administrat iv e positions, if any,)
Qualifica tion, Universit y and year of graduati on
Areas of Specializa tion
No. of research publications in # of journals and curren conferences tR& since joining D and the consul department tancy and Total no. projec of such ts and publications the amou nJ, nC NJ, nt NC 0 0 0 0 NIL
Mr. Amarnath J L
Lecturer
BE: 2005 M Tech : 2010 VTU
Software 07.09.201 Engineerin 0 g
Ver. June 2009
2011
P E S INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION SCIENCE & ENGINEERING ANNEXURE 5 List of Faculty Publications (CAY) Sl. No. Name of the Person Title of Paper Statistical Classification of Tuberculosis Using Data Mining Techniques Publications Citation International Conference on Image Processing (ICDIP), Bangalore, India, August 46,2010 2010 3rd IEEE International Conference on Computer Science and Information Technology (ICCSIT), Chengdu, 9-11 July, 2010 Second International Conference on Digital Image Processing, Kamaruzaman, February 2010 Singapore, pp. 409 412, SPIE, Vol. 7546, 75462Y Amrita ACM-W Celebration of Women in Computing, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, ISBN:978-1-45030194-7 International Conference on Computer and Automation Engineering, Singapore, February 26-28, 2010, Ref 978-1-42445850/10C 2010IEEE National or International
1.
2.
Classification of Tuberculosis using Ensemble Methods
3.
Dr. K N Balasubramanya Murthy
Association Rule Based Tuberculosis Disease Diagnosis
International Conference
4.
Aggregation of Gabor Wavelets and Curvelet with PCA for Efficient Retrieval of Face Images
5.
Face Recognition Using Trichotomic Combination of SVD, DF-LDA and LPP
Ver. June 2009
2011
Sl. No.
Name of the Person
Title of Paper Face detection in color images using skin color, Laplacian of Gaussian, and Euler number
6.
7.
A Novel Noise Immune Method for Skew Detection in Music Documents
Dr. K N Balasubramanya Murthy 8.
Efficient Retrieval of Face Images Based on Curvelets and Singular Value Decomposition
9.
10.
Face Recognition by Feedforward Neural Network using Laplacian of Gaussian filter and Singular Value Decomposition Location Recognition on Camera Embedded Mobile Phones based on MPEG-7 Color Layout Descriptor
Publications Citation International Conference on Digital Image Processing, Singapore, SPIE[7546-81], February 26-28, 2010, Vol. 75462912-8 International Conference on Semantic Computing, Dayananda Sagar College of Engineering, April 21- 23, 2010. International Conference on Computer and Network Technology 2010 , Karur, Chennai International Journal of Technology and Engineering System(IJTES) pp.114- 119 2010 First International Conference on Integrated Intelligent Computing, ICIIC 2010,Bangalore, pp. 56-61. MVIPPA-09, Bangkok, WASET vol 60 ISSN 20703724, pg895-899.
National or International
Ver. June 2009
2011
Sl. No.
Name of the Person
Title of Paper A smart automatic thumbnail cropping based on attention driven regions of interest extraction
11.
Dr. K N Balasubramanya Murthy
12.
13.
14. Prof. Shylaja S S 15.
16.
17.
Feature Extraction and Compression of face image using Gabor Filters Comparative Analysis of Color Layout Descriptor & Edge Histogram Descriptor Dimensionality Reduction using Gaussian Mixture Model-An Application to Face Recognition Aggregation of Gabor Wavelets and Curvelet with PCA for Efficient Retrieval of Face Images Face Recognition Using Trichotomic Combination of SVD, DF-LDA and LPP Face Detection in Color Images using Skin Color, LOG filter and Euler Number
Publications Citation ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 403 Proceedings of the 2nd ICCIT Seoul, Korea, Pages: 957-962 ,Year of Publication: 2009 ,ISBN:978-1-60558710-3. Jnanasarovara National Level Symposium on Cutting Edge Technologies National Conference on Intelligent Information Retrieval
National Conference on Intelligent Information Retrieval
Amrita ACM-W Celebration of Women in Computing International Conference Computer Automation Engineering
on and
2nd International Conference on Digital Image Proceedings in on 26th February, 2010
Ver. June 2009
2011
Sl. No.
Name of the Person
Title of Paper Efficient Retrieval of Face Images on Curvelet and Singular Value Decomposition Face Recognition by Feed forward Neural Network using Laplacian of Gaussian filter and Singular Value Decomposition
Publications Citation International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies First International Conference on Integrated Intelligent Computing, ICIIC 2010, Bangalore, pp. 56-61. International Conference on Machine Vision, Image Processing, and Pattern Analysis (MVIPPA-09), Bangkok, WASET vol 60 ISSN 20703724, pg895-899. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 403 ,Proceedings of the 2nd ICCIT Seoul, Korea, Pages: 957962 ,Year of Publication: 2009 ,ISBN:978-1-60558710-3
18.
19.
20.
Location on Prof. Shylaja S S Recognition Camera Embedded Mobile Phones based on MPEG-7 Color Layout Descriptor A smart automatic thumbnail cropping based on attention driven regions of interest extraction
21.
Ver. June 2009
2011
Sl. No.
Name of the Title of Paper Person Developing countries and information deficiency
Publications Citation 11 International Conference on Public communication of Science and Technology Dec 6 -10, 2010 10th International Conference on Networks, January 2328, 2011-St. Maarten , The Netherlands, Antilles 10th International Conference on Networks, January 2328, 2011. St. Maarten, The Netherland, Antilles International Conference on Mathematics and Computer Science, Feb 5-6, 2010, Chennai, pp.181- 186 National Conference on Communication and Computing Technologies, NCCT, Bangalore, Jan 22-23, 2010. Conference on Information Technology for Real World Problems, Andhra Pradesh, India December 9-11, 2010 Fifth Innovative Conference on Embedded Systems, Mobile Communication and Computing, July 26-28, 2010, PESIMSR, Kuppam, India, pg 87-95.
22.
23.
Energy Efficient Track Sector Routing in Randomly Deployed Wireless Sensor Networks. Analysis of Handover Algorithms Based on Wrong Decision Probability Model Programming Quotient: An Effective Metric for Software Engineers Programming Skills Simulation and Analysis of Modified Flood Fill Algorithm for Micromouse An Analytical Approach to Qualitative Aspects of WiMAX Physical Layer
24.
25.
Dr. Suthikshn Kumar
26.
National Conference
27.
28.
Lifetime Enhancement Protocol for cluster based Wireless Sensor Network
Innovative Conference
Ver. June 2009
2011
Sl. No.
Name of the Title of Paper Person
Publications Citation International Conference on Convergence of Science and Engineering in Education And Research- A Global Perspective In The New Mellinium, DSCE Campus, Bangalore, April 21-23 2010 International Conference on Communication, Computers and Devices (ICCCD) 2010, IIT Kharagpur,to be held in Dec 10-12, Poster 22nd IEEE-CS Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEE & T-09) 17-19, Feb 2009, Hyderabad, India. Pp. 284 - 287 AES 126th Convention, May 7-10, 2009, Munich, Germany, Paper Id: 7796 AES 127th Convention, Oct 9-12, 2009, New York, USA, Paper Id: 7895
29.
Threshold Based Energy Efficient Adaptive Cluster Head Selection Protocol
30.
Energy Cluster Wireless Network
Aware Based Sensor
31. Dr. Suthikshn Kumar 32.
Innovative Teaching of Software Engineering: Practical Approach with Labs
Acoustic Design of Classrooms
33.
34.
ASPARAGUS: Autonomous Robotic Explorer for Acoustic Measurement of Classrooms and Seminar Halls. Innovative Teaching of Software Engineering: Practical Approach with Labs
Computer Society of India Communications, Feb 2009, Vol 32, Issue 11, pp 18-20
35.
Fifth International Conference on MEMS, Handover in GSM NANO, and Smart Networks Systems (ICMENS), 2009
Ver. June 2009
2011
Sl. No. 36.
Name of the Person
Title of Paper
Publications Citation
37. Dr. Suthikshn Kumar 38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
Acoustic Design of AES 126th Convention, Classrooms May 7-10, 2009, Munich, Germany, Paper Id: 7796 ASPARAGUS: Autonomous AES 127th Convention, Robotic Explorer Oct 9-12, 2009, New for Acoustic York, USA, Paper Id: Measurement of 7895 Classrooms and Seminar Halls. Innovative Teaching of Computer Society of Software India Communications, Engineering: Feb 2009, Vol 32, Issue Practical Approach 11, pp 18-20 with Labs Fifth International Conference on MEMS, Handover in GSM NANO, and Smart Networks Systems (ICMENS), 2009 Application of WASET International Morphological conference on Digital Operations on Image Processing, Degraded Rome, Italy from 28-30 Historical April 2010. Document Image for Image Enhancement Degraded Third National Historical Conference on Recent Document Image Research Trends in Enhancement Advanced Computing Using Singular 9th- April 2010, Value Madhurai, India, Decomposition RTAC123. An Effective 16th Korea-Japan, Joint Technique to Workshop on Frontiers Enhance the of Computer Vision, Degraded Feb. 2010, pp 49-56. Documents Using Singular Value Decomposition and Adaptive Thresholding
National Conference
Ver. June 2009
2011
Sl. No.
Name of the Person Dr. K Srikanta Murthy
Title of Paper Novel Approach on Image Data Compression using Radial Basis Function Network An approach to improve Image Compression using Radial Basis Function Neural Network with Cumulative Distribution Function Vector Quantization based Radial Basis Function Neural Network with Cumulative Distribution Function for Efficient Image Compression An enhanced clusterer aggregation using nebulous pool A Novel Approach Using Active Control Model for Semi-Automatic Road Extraction from High Resolutions Satellite Imagery Association rule based tuberculosis disease diagnosis Statistical Classification of Tuberculosis Using Data Mining Techniques
Publications Citation Fourth International Conference on Information Processing (ICIP-2010), August 68, 2010, Bangalore, India, pp. 516 -518 14th World Multiconference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics (WMSCI 2010), June 29th-July 2nd, 2010, Orlando, Florida, USA, pp. 110-115.
43.
44.
45.
International Congress on Computer Applications and Computational Science (CACS 2010), Singapore, 4-6 December 2010 International conference
46.
Amrita ACM-W Celebration of Women in Computing
47. Dr. S Natarajan 48.
2010 Second International Conference on Machine Learning and Computing Second International Conference on Digital Image Processing International Conference on Image Processing (ICDIP), Bangalore, India, August 4-6,2010
49.
Ver. June 2009
2011
Sl. No.
Name of the Person
Title of Paper Aggregation of Gabor Wavelets and Curvelet with PCA for Efficient Retrieval of Face Images Face Recognition Using Trichotomic Combination of SVD, DF-LDA and LPP Face detection in color images using skin color, Laplacian of Gaussian, and Euler number A Novel Noise Immune Method for Skew Detection in Music Documents Efficient Retrieval of Face Images Based on Curvelets and Singular Value Decomposition Face Recognition by Feedforward Neural Network using Laplacian of Gaussian filter and Singular Value Decomposition Location Recognition on Camera Embedded Mobile Phones based on MPEG-7 Color Layout Descriptor
Publications Citation Amrita ACM-W Celebration of Women in Computing, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu International Conference on Computer and Automation Engineering, February 26-28, 2010, IEEE International Conference on Digital Image Processing, Singapore, SPIE[754681], February 26-28, 2010, Vol. 754629-128 International Conference on Semantic Computing, Dayananda Sagar College of Engineering International Conference on Computer and Network Technology 2010 , Karur, Chennai 2010 First International Conference on Integrated Intelligent Computing, ICIIC 2010,Bangalore, pp. 56-61
50.
51.
52.
53.
Dr. S Natarajan
International conference
54.
55.
56.
MVIPPA09,Bangkok,WASET vol 60 ISSN 20703724, pg895-899
Ver. June 2009
2011
Sl. No.
Name of the Person
Title of Paper A smart automatic thumbnail cropping based on attention driven regions of interest extraction
Publications Citation ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 403 ,Proceedings of the 2nd ICCIT Seoul, Korea, Pages: 957-962 ,Year of Publication: 2009 ,ISBN:978-1-60558710-3 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Pattern Recognition (AIPR09) July, 13-16 2009. To be held on Orlando. USA. National Conference on Computing, Communication and Technology 2010 (CCT-10) ), Bangalore, January 22-23 International Conference on Image Processing -2009, Bangalore, August 7-9, 2009 ICCSIT, IEEE Conference, Chengdu, China, July 9-11, 2010 ICDIP 2010,Singapore, SPIE, Feb. 26-28 2010 International Journal of Signal Processing, Image Processing and Pattern Recognition (IJSIP Vol.2 No.4 December 2009)
57.
58.
Road Extraction from high resolution satellite imagery using morphological reconstruction
59.
Data Caching using DSR in Ad hoc Networks. A Novel method for combining clusters in Spatial Cluster ensembles: a layered merge approach with inherent voting technique. Classification of Tuberculosis using Ensemble Methods Association Rule Based Tuberculosis Disease Diagnosis A novel video segmentation algorithm with shadow cancellation and adaptive threshold techniques"
National Conference
60.
Dr. S Natarajan
61.
62.
63.
Ver. June 2009
2011
Sl. No.
Name of the Person
Title of Paper A novel video segmentation algorithm with shadow cancellation and adaptive threshold techniques Interactive Shell Enhancement of Degraded Historical Document Image Using Curvelet Transform and Mathematical Morphology Line Segmentation in Handwritten Text A Combined Approach for Degraded Historical Documents Denoising using Curvelet & Mathematical Morphology An Effective Technique to Enhance the Degraded Documents Using Singular Value Decomposition and Adaptive Thresholding Application of Morphological Operations on Degraded Historical Document Image for Image Enhancement
Publications Citation SIP 2009, International Convention Center, Jeju Island, Korea, December 10-12, 2009. Volume 61, 304-311 National Conference on Knowledge Utsav, Bangalore, August 2010
64. Dr. S Natarajan
65.
66.
International conference on Computer Engineering and Technology, Nov 2010.
67.
Dr. S Natarajan
IEEE International Conference, Jodhpur, India
68.
International Conference on Computer Engineering & Technology, Dec 28th, 29th 2010
69.
16th Korea - Japan joint Workshop on frontiers of computer vision FCV 2010 pp 50-56, Japan
Ms. Ganga Holi
70.
WASET International conference on Digital Image Processing, Rome, Italy from 28-30 April 2010. PP 944-947.
Ver. June 2009
2011
Sl. No.
Name of the Person
Title of Paper Extraction of Text Lines from Handwritten Kannada Documents Enhancement of Degraded Historical Document Image Using Curvelet Transform and Mathematical Morphology Degraded Historical Document Image Enhancement Using Singular Value Decomposition Interactive Shell
Publications Citation International conference on Computer Engineering and Technology, Jodhpur, Nov 2010. International conference on Computer Engineering and Technology, Jodhpur, Nov 2010.
71.
72. Ms. Ganga Holi
73.
Third National Conference on Recent Research Trends in Advanced Computing 9th- April 2010, RTAC123. National Conference on Knowledge Utsav, Bangalore, August 2010
National Conference
74.
75.
76.
Ms. Sangeetha J
77.
78.
Ms. Ambika T
International Conference on A Survey on IEEE Computer 802.16j Mobile Multi Engineering & Hop Relay Networks. Technology, Dec th th 28 , 29 International Conference on Computer A Comparative study Engineering & on Wifi and Wimax Technology, Dec 28th, 29th 2010 International A Survey on IEEE Conference on 802.16j Mobile Computer Engineering Multi Hop Relay & Technology, Networks. Jodhpur, Rajasthan National Conference on Computing, Data Caching Communication and using DSR in Ad Technology 2010 hoc Networks (CCT-10) ), Bangalore, January 22-23, 2010
National Conference
Ver. June 2009
2011
Sl. No.
Name of the Person
Title of Paper
79.
80.
Bandwidth Aware Load Balancing and Optimal bandwidth Allocation Techniques for Video-on-Demand System Architectural Solution for Improving Performance of Video-on-Demand Mr. Vinay A Systems
IEEE International Conference on Communication Control and Computing Technologies
81.
82.
83. Mr. Devaraj Verma C 84.
85. Mr. Dheeraj D 86.
IEEE International Conference on Internet Multimedia Systems Architecture and Application 2010 (IMSAA 2010) International An Efficient Video Conference on Streaming Communication and Architecture for Computational Video-on-Demand Intelligence (INCOCCI Systems 2010) A Novel International Framework for Conference on Distributed Computer and Dynamic Load Engineering Balancing in Technology 2010 Video-on-Demand (ICCET 2010) Systems Design of compressed International Journal of memory model for Computer Science robotics based on issues AVC standard National Conference Design of on Artificial Computational Intelligence and Model for Robotics Software Engineering2010 International An Entropy based conference on approach for Computer Engineering offline signature and Technology, Nov verification 2010. National Conference Offline signature on Emerging verification using Technologies in CEQ Computer Science
National Conference
National Conference
Ver. June 2009
2011
Sl. No.
Name of the Person
Title of Paper
87.
Ms. Usha D
88.
Ms. P Ramadevi
89.
Ms. Chitali
International A Novel Approach conference on to offline signature Computer Engineering verification using and Technology, Nov distance classifier 2010. Enhanced Clustering Algorithm based International on Minimum Conference on Demand Spanning Tree Computing Oxford using Divide & College 2010 Conquer Technique Enhanced Clustering Algorithm based International on Minimum Conference on Demand Spanning Tree Computing Oxford using Divide & College 2010 Conquer Technique
Ver. June 2009
2011
P E S INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION SCIENCE & ENGINEERING ANNEXURE 6 Faculty R & D and Consultancy Details Funding Agency / Company AICTE Rs. 5 Lakhs IBM Rs. 2 Lakhs AICTE Rs. 5 Lakhs 3. Dr. Srikanta Murthy IBM Rs. 1 Lakh 4. 5. Ms. Ganga Holi Mr. Karthik S IBM Rs. 1 Lakh IBM Rs. 1 Lakh Consultancy Consultancy / Project Proposal Project Consultancy Project
Sl No. 1. 2.
Name of the Faculty Dr. K Murthy N Balasubramnya
Prof. Shylaja S S
Consultancy Consultancy
Ver. June 2009
2011
P E S INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION SCIENCE & ENGINEERING ANNEXURE 7 Facilities and Technical Support Description of Class rooms, faculty rooms, seminar and conference halls
Room Description Class Room No. F101 Class Room No. F103 Class Room No. F104 Class Room No. F201 Class Room No. F203 Class Room No. F204 PG Class Room / Tutorial Room No. F102
Usage Class room for 2nd year Classrdroom for 3 year Classrdroom for 3 year Class room for 2nd year Classthroom for 4 year Class room for 4th year
Shared / Capacity Exclusive
Rooms Equipped with
Each room Equipped with the following 01 Green Board, 01 White Board, 01 DLP, 01 Projector Screen 01 Camera 01 Podium 6 Desk 11 8 Desk 06 14 Tube Lights 06 Fans Each room Equipped with the following 01 Green Board 01 White Board 01 DLP 01 Projector Screen 01 Camera 01 Podium, 6 Desk 11 8 Desk 06 14 Tube Lights 06 Fans
80
Exclusive
Tutorial Room No. F202
To conduct classes for M. Tech Students and tutorial for below average students
36
Ver. June 2009
2011
Room Description
Usage
Shared / Exclusive
Capacity
Rooms Equipped with
Seminar Hall
To conduct Conferences, Seminars and Workshops
Shared
150
01 Green Board, 01 White Board, 01 Projector Screen, 01 Podium, 150 S type chairs orange, 18 Fans, 40 Tube Lights, 03 Staff Tables, 01 Computer Table, 01 Wireless Mike, 01 Collar Mike, 01 Clock 120 Ton AC 1200 chairs 2 Green Rooms Equipped with lights High end Sound systems
Auditorium
To conduct Conferences, Seminars and Workshops
Shared
1200
Ground Floor Conference Room
Ground Floor Conference Room
To conduct meeting among faculty and students
Exclusive
07
01 White Board 07 black chairs 01 Fan 04 Small Tube Lights 02 Staff Tables
Ver. June 2009
2011
Room Description
Usage
Shared / Exclusive
Capacity
Rooms Equipped with 01 PC, 01 Laptop, 01 Printer, Internet speed of 100 Mbps, 01 Book racks, 01 White Board, 02 Staff Tables, 01 Computer Table, 07 Revolving Chairs, 02 Fans, 03 Tube Lights, 01 Red Board, 01 Phone, 01 Clock 02 PC, 02 Printer, Internet speed of 100 Mbps, 29 Closed Shelf, 07 Glass Shelf, 03 Open Shelf, 01 Xerox Machine, 02 Computer Tables, 01 Xerox Machine Table Black Chairs, 02 Phones, 02 OHP, 01 DLP, 04 Laptops, 01 ACS System
HOD Room
Occupancy of HOD for administrative work, preparation to class
10
Exclusive
Department Office
Office Assistants for Department work
07
Ver. June 2009
2011
Room Description
Usage
Shared / Exclusive
Capacity
Rooms Equipped with 05 PC, 01 Printers, 01 Scanner, Internet speed of 100 Mbps, 11 Book racks, 08 Big Tube Lights, 06 Small Tube Light, 03 Fans, 07 Revolving Chair, 07 Black Chair, 03 Phones, 01 Standing Fan 02 PC, 02 Printers, 01 Phone, 01 Fan, 01 Tube Light, 01 Revolving Chair, 03 Black Chairs 07 PC 04 Printers Internet speed of 100 Mbps 11 Book racks, 09 Revolving Chair, 01 Black Chair, 03 Phones , 08 Big Tube Lights, 06 Small Tube Lights, 03 Fans
Ground Floor Staff Room
Faculty Members for administrative work, preparation to class, reading and other coordination
11
Exclusive Ground Floor Inner Staff Room Faculty Members for administrative work, preparation to class, reading and other coordination First Floor Staff Room 11 02
Ver. June 2009
2011
Room Description
Usage
Shared / Exclusive
Capacity
Rooms Equipped with 01 PC, 01 Printer, 01 Fan, 01 Tube Light, 01 Revolving Chair, 03 Black Chairs 01 PC, 01 Printer, Internet speed of 100 Mbps, 01 Book racks, 01 White Board, 02 Staff Tables, 01 Computer Table, 02 Revolving Chairs, 02 Black Chairs, 02 Fans, 06 Tube Lights, 02 Phones 29 Closed Shelf, 07 Glass Shelf, 03 Open Shelf, 02 Fans, 02 Tube Lights, 01 Staff Table, 02 Black Chairs
First Floor Inner KRP Room
02
Professors for research work, preparation to class, reading, etc. First Floor KRP Room Exclusive 07
First Floor Library Room
Department Library
04
Ver. June 2009
2011
Table 8.1. Continuing Education
Module Description
Any other contributory Inst./Industry
Duratio n
Resource Persons
Target Audience
In CAY M2 2008-09 Innovative methods of teaching computer science topics Indo Australian Workshop Dr. Padamnab an Krishnan Effective teaching skills for enhancing the teaching process. Australian Institute Interaction with PESIT ISE Introduction to Mutilcore and its uses Effective teaching skills for enhancing the teaching process.
Industry
PESIT & BITES
1 Day
Faculty
Institution
Dr. Suthikshn Kumar
2 Days
Dr. Omkar
Faculty & Students from India and Australia Faculty & Students
Multi-core Programming
Industry
PESIT & BITES
1 Day
Om Sachan & Jaya Krishna Wipro Trainers
Mission 10 X
Industry
PESIT & WIPRO
1 Week
Faculty
In CAY M1 2009-10 Dr. K N Balasubramn aya Murthy and Prof. Shylaja S S Dr. Nirmal Kumar Sanchiet Guidelines for effective program writing
Effective Programming
Institution
1 Day
Faculty
Ver. June 2009
2011
Module Description
Any other contributory Inst./Industr y
Developed/ organized by Dr. K N Balasubramn aya Murthy and Prof. Shylaja S S
Duratio n
Resource Persons Trainers from Integra Micro Systems Mr. Venkatram an, CEO Dr. Krishnan, CTO Wipro Trainers
Target Audience
Usages and citation etc. Introduction to Mobile OSs, Mobile Application Development
Android Application Development
Industry
2 Days
Faculty & Students
Interactive Learning Tools
Industry
Dr. Srikanta Murthy
2 Days
Faculty & Students
Usage of learning tools
Mission 10 X
Industry
PESIT & WIPRO
1 Week
Faculty
Effective teaching skills for enhancing the teaching process.
In CAY 2010-11 Prof. Shylaja SS Prof. Shylaja SS& Prof. Nithin V Pujari Mr. Deepak Nadig Prof. N S Kumar Dr. S S Prabhu and Dr. Chandras hekar Ramanath an Faculty & Students Hands on experience and research focus Preplacement training
NS 2
Industry
3 Days
IT for Non IT
Industry and Institution
3 Days
Students
MOODELS
Institution
Dr. K N Balasubramn aya Murthy
1 Day
Faculty
Learning Resource Management
Ver. June 2009
2011
Table 8.2 New Facility Created Module Description Any other contributory Inst./Industry Developed/ organized by Resource Persons Target Audience Usages and citation etc.
Duration
In CAY m2 2008-09 Interaction through C++ Discussion Forum Interaction through Data Structures Discussion Forum Health Informatics Management Information System 6 Days / Semester (2 Hrs / Day) 4 Days / Semester (2 Hrs / Day)
Institution
Prof. Shylaja S S
Prof. Shylaja S S
V Semester Students Helpful for placements
Institution
Prof. Shylaja S S
Prof. Shylaja S S
III Semester Students VI semester Students VI semester Students
Industry Dr. S Natarajan Industry 2 Hrs Each
Mr. Shreeephad Mr. Dominic.
Application of the Subject in industry
In CAY m1 2009-10 Interaction through Data Structures Discussion Forum Software Testing
Institution
Prof. Shylaja S S Dr. S Natarajan & MS. Mamatha H R Dr. S Natarajan & Mr. Vinay A Ms. Nagasundar i S & Mr. Vinay A
4 Days (2 Hrs / Day)
Prof. Shylaja S S
IV semester students
Helpful for placements
Industry
Prof. B V Prasad
VIII semester students VI semester Students VII semester Students Application of the Subject in industry
Management Information System J2EE Programmin g
Industry
2 Hrs each
Prof. S Ramani Mr. Lobo Francis James
Industry
Ver. June 2009
2011
Module Description Interaction through Unix Shell Programmin g Discussion Forum Interaction through C++ Discussion Forum
Any other contributory Inst./Industry
Duration
Resource Persons
Target Audience
Institution
Ms. Sumathi M
4 Days / semester (2 Hrs / Day) 4 Days / semester (2 Hrs / Day)
Ms. Sumathi M
Institution
Ms. Vijaykala & Mr. Vinay. A
Ms. Vijaykala & Mr. Vinay. A
In CAY 2010-11 System Software OOP using C++ Interaction through C++ Discussion Forum Graph Theory & Combinatiric s Entrepreneur ship & Management Innovation, Creativity, Technical Leadership and Professional ExcellenceMadame Curie Approach Interaction through C Forum
Ver. June 2009
Industry Industry
Prof. Shylaja S S Prof. Shylaja S S Prof. Shylaja S S
2 Hrs each 4 Days / semester (2 Hrs / Day)
Prof. Ananthram an Prof. N S Kumar Prof. Shylaja S S Dr. Sudarshan Iyengar Prof. Suresh Babu Hemanth Kumar
V semester students
Hardcore knowledge about the subject Helpful for placements Hardcore knowledge about the subject
Institution
III semester students
Institution
Prof. Shylaja S S Dr. S Natarajan Dr. S Natarajan
Industry Industry
VII semester students
2 Hrs each
Acquiring leadership Industry Mr. Devaraj Verma C Dr. Basavaraj V & VII semester students
Institution
Ms. Vijaykala
4 Days / semester (2 Hrs / Day)
Ms. Vijaykala
I semester students
2011
P E S INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION SCIENCE & ENGINEERING ANNEXURE 9 OVERALL IMPROVEMENTS
In CAY m2 2008-09 List of PEO(s), which are strengthe ned
Specify the improveme nt
Improvement brought in
Contribute d by
Comments, if any
Theory
Labs
Special Topic
Seminars Project Work Electives
Forums
Guest Lectures
Buddy System
Introduction of subjects in the upcoming areas / 1, 2 & 3 technologies (industry specific courses) Introduction of new labs like Operating Systems Lab and 1&2 Object Oriented Analysis & Design Lab Introduction of 2 credit self Members of learning course called 1, 2, 3, 4 BOS & special topics that enhances &5 DPAC major PEOs Committees Introduction of 1 credit 1, 2, 3, 4 seminar work to introduce &5 different areas of research Introduction of 24 credit full 1, 2, 3, 4 time project work that can be &5 carried out at industry. Domain Specific electives that nurture the technical 1, 2 & 3 knowledge of the students Discussion forums in Faculty subjects like C++ and Data members 1, 2 & 5 Structures and students Invited Understating Application People from Perspective of subjects like 1, 2 & 4 Academia / MIS Industry VII A pre-placement activity to Semester 1, 2, 3 & 5 increase employability students and Alumni
Analytical ability and Conceptual Knowledge increased Provides hands on experience of theoretical concepts Inculcates self learning, method of report preparation Exposes students to different research domains Exposes students to work environment of software industry. Tuned towards focus on higher education in specific domains Pre placement Training Enhancing understandability hardcore topics Increase in (T1 & T2)
of
placements
Ver. June 2009
2011
In CAY m1 2009-10 Specify the improve ment List of PEO(s), Contribute which d by are strength ened 1, 2 & 3
Improvement brought in
Comments, if any
Theory
Introduction of subjects in the upcoming areas / technologies (industry specific courses) Introduction of new labs like Operating Systems Lab, Microcontroller Lab, Advanced Java Lab, Object Oriented Analysis & Design Lab Introduction of 2 credit self learning course called special topics that enhances major PEOs Introduction of 1 credit seminar work to introduce different areas of research Introduction of 24 credit full time project work that can be carried out at industry. Domain Specific electives that nurture the technical knowledge of the students. Technical subjects like Open Source Systems and Management subjects like TQM were opted. Members of BOS & DPAC Committee s
Analytical ability and Conceptual Knowledge increased Provides hands on experience of theoretical concepts
Labs
1&2
Special Topic
Seminar s Project Work
Inculcates self learning & also imbibed research 1, 2, 3, culture at UG level 4& 5 leading to research publications Exposes students to 1, 2, 3, 4 different research &5 domains Exposes students to work 1, 2, 3, 4 environment of software &5 industry.
Electives
1, 2 & 3
Students can opt even interdisciplinary electives at institution level.
Forums
Guest Lectures
Buddy System
Faculty members 1, 2 & 5 and students Invited Understating Application People Perspective of subjects like MIS, from 1, 2 & 4 Software Testing and J2EE Academia / Industry VII A pre-placement activity to Semester 1, 2, 3 & increase employability students 5 and Alumni Discussion forums in subjects like C++, Data Structures, Unix Shell Programming.
Pre placement Training
Enhancing understandability hardcore topics
of
Increase in placements (T1 & T2)
Ver. June 2009
2011
Specify the improve ment
Labs
Special Topic
Seminars Project Work
Electives
Forums
Expert Lectures
Buddy System
In CAY 2010-11 List of PEO(s), Contrib which Improvement brought in uted by are strengt hened Introduction of new labs like Operating Systems Lab, Microcontroller Lab, Advanced 1&2 Java Lab, Object Oriented Analysis & Design Lab Introduction of 2 credit self learning course called special 1, 2, 3, topics that enhances major 4& 5 PEOs Introduction of 1 credit seminar Member 1, 2, 3, work to introduce different s of 4&5 areas of research BOS & Introduction of 24 credit full DPAC 1, 2, 3, time project work that can be Committ 4&5 carried out at industry. ees Domain Specific electives that nurture the technical knowledge of the students. Specific electives like Mobile Systems Engineering, 1, 2 & 3 Cryptography & Network Security, Multicore Programming with labs sessions being introduced to enhance classroom learning Faculty Discussion forums in subjects members like C++, Data Structures, Unix 1, 2 & 5 and Shell Programming. students Invited Guest lectures by experts from People industry and academia in from 1, 2 & 4 subjects like GTC, C++, Academi System Software a/ Industry VII Semester A pre-placement activity to 1, 2, 3 students increase employability &5 and Alumni
Comments, if any
Provides hands on experience of theoretical concepts Inculcates self learning & also imbibed research culture at UG level leading to research publications Exposes students to different research domains Exposes students to work environment of software industry.
Students can opt even interdisciplinary electives at institution level.
Pre placement Training
Enhancing understandability of hardcore topics
Increase in placements (T1 & T2) and internship projects (95%)
Ver. June 2009
2011
P E S INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION SCIENCE & ENGINEERING ANNEXURE 10 Table 10.1 Course Modules for 2009 2013 Batch Additional PEOs Units Science/HSS theory/lab/ specified / assignment by Theory Lab Professional s/ Comment Affiliating Units Units Core, tests s Univ. or Elective needed the Credits Credits or Breadth? to meet College? objectives? 5 -4 Science 5 -3 5 12 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 3 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 1 12 1 12 1 --12 1 12 1 -12 1 --12 1 -12 1
Course
Linear Algebra Discrete Mathematics & Combinatorics Digital Design (Theory & Laboratory) Data Structures (Theory & Laboratory) OOP with C++ (Theory & Laboratory) Computer Architecture and Organization Methods of Applied Mathematics Analysis and Design of Algorithms Object oriented (Theory & Laboratory) Programming using Java System Software (Theory & Laboratory) Microcontrollers (Theory & Laboratory) Finite Automata and Formal Languages Data Communications Operating Systems (Theory & Laboratory) Compiler Design Web Technologies (Theory & Laboratory)
Ver. June 2009
Professional Core
Science
PEOs specified by the College as per the guidelines of the Affiliating University
YES 2 CIEs, 1 Quiz and SEE conducted for all the courses NIL
Professional Core
2011
Units Course Theory Units Credits Database Management Systems (Theory & Laboratory) Special Topics Computer Networks (Theory & Laboratory) Unix System Programming (Theory & Laboratory) Principles of Programming Languages (Theory & Laboratory) Software Engineering Management Information Systems XML Operations Research Multimedia Computing Multicore Programming Special Topics Seminar Project Work Lab Units Credits 6+1 mini project 1 -2 12 1 12 1 12 1 ---------1 -2 --24
Additional PEOs Science/HSS theory/lab/ specified / assignment by Professional s/ Comment Affiliating Core, tests s Univ. or Elective needed the or Breadth? to meet College? objectives?
5 4 -5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4
Self Learning Course
1 CIE and 1 SEE
Professional Core PEOs specified by the College as per the guidelines of the Affiliating University Group A Elective YES 2 CIEs, 1 Quiz and SEE conducted for all the courses
NIL
1 CIE and 1 SEE
Breadth
1 CIE and 1 SEE
Ver. June 2009
2011
Table 10.2 Course Modules for 2008 2012 Batch PEOs Units specified Science/HSS/ by Professional Theory Lab Affiliatin Course Core, Units Units g Elective Univ. or Credits Credits or Breadth? the College? 5 -Linear Algebra 4 Science 5 Discrete Mathematical -3 Structures 5 12 Digital Design Theory 4 1 & Laboratory 5 12 Data Structures Theory 4 1 Professional & Laboratory Core 5 12 Unix Shell Prgmg Theory & Laboratory 4 1 5 Computer Architecture -4 and Organization PEOs 5 Methods of Applied specified -4 Mathematics II by the Science 5 Graph Theory and College as -3 Combinatorics per the 5 12 guidelines OOP using C++ 4 1 of the Theory & Laboratory Affiliating 6+1 Database Management University 5 Mini Systems Theory & Project Laboratory 4 1 5 12 Microprocessors Professional 4 1 Theory & Laboratory Core 5 -Software Engineering 4 5 Finite Automata and -4 Formal Languages 5 12 Operating Systems (Theory & Laboratory) Data Communications Analysis and Design of Algorithms (Theory & Laboratory)
Ver. June 2009
Additional theory/lab/ assignment s/ Comment tests s needed to meet objectives?
YES 2 CIEs, 1 Quiz and SEE conducted for all the courses
NIL
4 5 4 5 4
1 -12 1
Professional Core
2011
Units Course Theory Units Credits Special Topics Computer Networks (Theory & Laboratory) Unix System Programming (Theory & Laboratory) Advanced Java Programming (Theory & Laboratory) Principles of Programming Languages Programming the Web Compiler Design Operations Research Multimedia Computing Multicore Programming Software Project Management Special Topics Data Mining & Warehousing (Theory & Laboratory) Object Oriented Modeling and Design (Theory & Laboratory) -2 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 -2 5 4 5 4 --------6+1 mini project 1 10 + 1 Mini Project 1 Lab Units Credits -12 1 12 1 12 1
Science/HSS/ Professional Core, Elective or Breadth? Self Learning Course
PEOs specified by Affiliatin g Univ. or the College?
Additional theory/lab/ assignment s/ tests needed to meet objectives? 1 CIE and 1 SEE
Comments
Professional Core YES 2 CIEs, 1 Quiz and SEE conducted for all the courses NIL
Group A Elective
1 CIE and 1 SEE YES 2 CIEs, 1 Quiz and SEE conducted for all the courses
Professional Core
Ver. June 2009
2011
Units Course Theory Units Credits Mobile Computing (Theory & Laboratory) CSPA Digital Image Processing Adhoc Sensor Networks Web2.0 Entrepreneurship & Management XML Enterprise Resource Planning Network Security & Cryptography Natural Language Processing Embedded Computing System Cloud Computing Algorithms of Intelligent Web Term Paper Seminar Project Work
Ver. June 2009
Lab Units Credits 12 1 ----------
Science/HSS/ Professional Core, Elective or Breadth? Professional Core
PEOs specified by Affiliatin g Univ. or the College?
Additional theory/lab/ assignment s/ tests needed to meet objectives?
Comment s
5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 -2 -1 --
Group B Elective YES 2 CIEs, 1 Quiz and SEE conducted for all the courses
Group C Elective ------24 Breadth Self Learning Course
NIL
1 CIE and 1 SEE 1 CIE and 1 SEE
2011
Table 10.2 Course Modules for 2007 2011 Batch PEOs Additional Units Science/HSS/ specified theory/lab/ Professional by assignments/ Theory Lab Course Core, Affiliating tests needed Units Units Elective Univ. or to meet Credit or Breadth? the Credits objectives? s College? 5 -Linear Algebra 4 Science 5 Discrete Mathematical -4 Structures 5 12 Digital Design Theory 4 1 & Laboratory 5 12 OOP using C++ Theory & Laboratory Unix and Shell Programming Theory & Laboratory Computer Architecture and Organization Complex Analysis, PDE and Numerical Methods Graph Theory and Combinatorics Data Structures Theory & Laboratory Database Management Systems Theory & Laboratory Microprocessors Theory & Laboratory Software Engineering Finite Automata and Formal Languages Operating Systems (Theory & Laboratory) Data Communications Analysis and Design of Algorithms (Theory & Laboratory)
Ver. June 2009
Commen ts
4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4
1 12 1 ---12 1 6+1 Mini Project 1 12 1 --12 1 -12 1
Professional Core
Science
Professional Core
YES 2 CIEs, 1 Quiz and SEE conducted for all the courses
NIL
Professional Core
2011
Units Course Theory Units Credits System Software (Theory & Laboratory) Special Topic Computer Networks (Theory & Laboratory) Unix System Programming (Theory & Laboratory) Programming in Java (Theory & Laboratory) Software Testing Open Source Systems Data Mining and Warehousing Operations Research Artificial Intelligence Distributed Systems Computer Graphics Multimedia Computing Seminar Special Topic 5 4 -5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 5 4 -1 -2 Lab Units Credit s 6+1 Mini Project 1 -12 1 12 1 12 1 ---
Science/HSS/ Professional Core, Elective or Breadth?
PEOs Additional specified theory/lab/ by assignments/ Affiliating tests needed Univ. or to meet the objectives? College?
Commen ts
1 CIE and 1 SEE
Professional Core PEOs specified by the College as per the guidelines of the Affiliating University YES 2 CIEs, 1 Quiz and SEE conducted for all the courses YES
NIL
Group A ---Group B -----Professional Core
1 CIE and 1 SEE
Ver. June 2009
2011
Units Course Theory Units Credits Web Technologies (Theory & Laboratory) Object Oriented Modeling and Design (Theory & Laboratory) Mobile Computing (Theory & Laboratory) Network Management Digital Image Processing Natural Language Processing XML Technologies Entrepreneurship and Management Enterprise Resource Planning Network Security and Cryptography Adhoc Sensor Networks Compiler Design Seminar Project Work 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 -1 --Lab Units Credit s 12 1 10 + 2 Mini Project s 1 12 1 --------
Science/HSS/ Professional Core, Elective or Breadth?
PEOs Additional specified theory/lab/ by assignments/ Affiliating tests needed Univ. or to meet the objectives? College?
Comment s
Professional Core
YES PEOs specified by the College as per the guidelines of the Affiliating University 2 CIEs, 1 Quiz and SEE conducted for all the courses
Group C
NIL
Group D -----24
Breadth
1 CIE and 1 SEE
Ver. June 2009
2011
P E S INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION SCIENCE & ENGINEERING ANNEXURE 11 Table 11.1: List of Course Modules for 2009 2013 Batch Units Course Theory Lab Quality of PEOs specified? (Poor / Avg / Good / Excellent) Additional contents to meet objectives? Assig nmen t/ Test YES YES YES ----YES YES Assessment through Course files/Lab and assignment sheets/Test papers Assignments to enhance learning Lab Instructions ----Tutorials Assignments to enhance learning -Mini Projects to enhance technical knowledge Additional Lab Lab Instructions ----
Theory
Lab
Linear Algebra Discrete Mathematics & Combinatorics Digital Design (Theory & Laboratory) Data Structures (Theory & Laboratory) OOP with C++ (Theory & Laboratory) Computer Architecture and Organization Methods of Applied Mathematics Analysis and Design of Algorithms (Theory & Laboratory) Object oriented Programming using Java (Theory & Laboratory) System Software Microcontrollers (Theory & Laboratory) Finite Automata and Formal Languages Data Communications
4 3 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 3 5 4
--12 1 12 1 12 1 --12 1 12 1 -12 1 --Excellent
------YES ---
---YES --------
--
---
YES
-----
YES YES ----
------
Ver. June 2009
2011
Units
Course Theory Lab
Additional contents to Quality of meet objectives? PEOs specified? (Poor / Assign Avg / Theory Lab ment / Good / Test Excellent) ------YES ---
Operating Systems (Theory & Laboratory) Compiler Design Web Technologies (Theory & Laboratory) Database Management Systems (Theory & Laboratory) Special Topics Computer Networks (Theory & Laboratory) Unix System Programming (Theory & Laboratory) Principles of Programming Languages (Theory & Laboratory) Software Engineering Management Information Systems XML Operations Research Multimedia Computing Multicore Programming Special Topics
Ver. June 2009
5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 -5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 --
12 1 -12 1 6+1 mini project 1 -2 12 1 12 1 12 1 -------2 Excellent ----
Assessment through Course files/Lab and assignment sheets/Test papers Assignments to enhance learning -----
--
--
--
--
----
----
----
----
--
--------
--YES -----
YES YES -YES ----
Case studies as assignments Additional Lab rstanding Assignments to enhance learning ----
2011
Units
Course Theory Lab
Additional contents to Quality of meet objectives? PEOs specified? (Poor / Assign Avg / Theory Lab ment / Good / Test Excellent)
Assessment through Course files/Lab and assignment sheets/Test papers --
Data Mining & Warehousing (Theory & Laboratory) OOMD (Theory & Laboratory) Mobile Computing (Theory & Laboratory) Computer System Performance Analysis
5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5
6+1 mini project 1 10+ 2 mini project 1 12 1 --
--
--
--
--
--
YES
Case studies
---
---
---
--Mini projects to implement the conceptual knowledge gained --Case studies as assignments to enhance learning Mini projects to implement the knowledge gained --
Digital Image Processing 4
-Excellent
--
YES
---
Adhoc Sensor Networks Web2.0 Entrepreneurship & Management Enterprise Resource Planning
5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5
----
----
----
--YES
--
--
--
YES
Network Security & Cryptography 4 --YES --
Natural Language Processing

Ver. June 2009
5
4
--
--
--
--
2011
Units
Course Theory Lab
Quality of PEOs specified? (Poor / Avg / Good / Excellent)
Additional contents to meet objectives?
Theory
Lab
Assign ment / Test
Assessment through Course files/Lab and assignment sheets/Test papers -Mini projects to implement the conceptual knowledge gained -----
Embedded Computing System
5 4 5 -----
Cloud Computing 4
-Excellent
--
YES
--
Algorithms of Intelligent Web Term Paper Seminar Project Work
5 4 2 1 ----24 ---------------
Ver. June 2009
2011
Table 11.1: List of Course Modules for 2008 2012 Batch Units Additional contents to meet objectives? Assessmen t through Course files/Lab and assignmen t sheets/Test papers Assignmen ts to enhance learning Lab Instructions --Tutorials Assignmen ts to enhance learning --
Course Theory Lab
Theory
Lab
Assign ment / Test
Linear Algebra Discrete Mathematical Structures Digital Design Theory & Laboratory Data Structures Theory & Laboratory Unix and Shell Programming Theory & Laboratory Computer Architecture and Organization Methods of Applied Mathematics II Graph Theory and Combinatorics Object Oriented Programming using C++ Theory & Laboratory Database Management Systems Theory & Laboratory Microprocessors Theory & Laboratory Software Engineering Finite Automata and Formal Languages
5 4 5 3 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 3 5 4
--12 1 12 1 12 1 ---12 1 6+1 Mini Projec t 1 12 1 -Excellent
------YES ----
---YES ----------
YES YES -----YES YES --
5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4
--
--
--
--
--
YES
--
Lab Instructions Case studies as assignment --
--
--
YES
--
--
---
---
Ver. June 2009
2011
Units
Course Theory Lab
Theory
Lab
Assign ment / Test
Assessmen t through Course files/Lab and assignment sheets/Test papers ---
Data Communications Analysis and Design of Algorithms (Theory & Laboratory) System Software (Theory & Laboratory)
5 4 5 4
-12 1 6+1 Mini projec t 1 -12 1 12 1 12 1 --------Excellent
---
---
---
5 4 -2 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 -2
--
--
--
--
Special Topics Computer Networks (Theory & Laboratory) Unix System Programming (Theory & Laboratory) Advanced Java Programming (Theory & Laboratory) Principles of Programming Languages Programming the Web Compiler Design Operations Research Multimedia Computing Multicore Programming Software Project Management Special Topics
Ver. June 2009
----
----
----
----
--
--
--
-Case studies Mini projects -------
---------
-YES -------
YES --------
2011
Units
Course Theory Lab
Theory
Lab
Assign ment / Test
Assessment through Course files/Lab and assignment sheets/Test papers
Data Mining & Warehousing (Theory & Laboratory)
5 4
Object Oriented Modeling and Design (Theory & Laboratory) Mobile Computing (Theory & Laboratory) CSPA
5 4 5 4 5 4 5
6+1 mini projec t 1 10 + 1 Mini Projec t 1 12 1 --
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
---
---
---
--Mini projects to implement the conceptual knowledge gained -Mini projects to implement the conceptual knowledge gained Case studies Mini projects to implement the conceptual knowledge gained
Digital Image Processing 4
-Excellent
--
YES
---
Adhoc Sensor Networks
5 4 5
--
--
--
--
Web2.0 4
--
--
YES
---
Entrepreneurship & Mgmt.
5 4 5
--
--
--
YES
XML 4
--
--
YES
--
Ver. June 2009
2011
Units
Course Theory Lab
Additional contents to meet objectives? Assi gnm ent / Test
Theory
Lab
5 Enterprise Resource Planning Network Security & Cryptography Natural Language Processing Embedded Computing System 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 Cloud Computing 4 -Excellent --------------YES
Assessment through Course files/Lab and assignment sheets/Test papers Case studies as assignments to enhance learning --
--
-Mini projects to implement the conceptual knowledge gained -----
--
--
YES
--
Algorithms of Intelligent Web Term Paper Seminar Project Work 4 2 1 ----24 -------------
Ver. June 2009
2011
Table 11.1: List of Course Modules for 2007 2011 Batch Units Additional contents to meet objectives? Assessmen t through Course files/Lab and assignment sheets/Test papers Assignment s to enhance -learning Lab Instructions --
Course Theory Lab
Theory
Lab
Assign ment / Test
Linear Algebra Discrete Mathematical Structures Digital Design Theory & Laboratory Object Oriented Programming using C++ Theory & Laboratory Unix and Shell Programming Theory & Laboratory Computer Architecture and Organization Complex Analysis, PDE and Numerical Methods Graph Theory and Combinatorics Data Structures Theory & Laboratory Database Management Systems Theory & Laboratory Microprocessors Theory & Laboratory Software Engineering
5 4 5 3 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 3 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4
--12 1 12 1 12 1 ---12 1 6+1 Mini Projec t 1 12 1 -Excellent
------
---YES --
YES YES ---
--
--
--
--
YES ----
-------
-YES YES --
Tutorials Assignment s to enhance -learning --
--
--
--
--
--
YES
--
Lab Instructions Case studies as assignment
--
--
YES
Ver. June 2009
2011
Units
Course Theory Lab
Theory
Lab
Assessmen t through Course files/Lab Assig and nme nt / assignment Test sheets/Test papers ----------
Finite Automata and Formal Languages Operating Systems (Theory & Laboratory) Data Communications Analysis and Design of Algorithms (Theory & Laboratory) System Software (Theory & Laboratory) Special Topic Computer Networks (Theory & Laboratory) Unix System Programming (Theory & Laboratory) Programming in Java (Theory & Laboratory) Software Testing Open Source Systems Data Mining and Warehousing Operations Research Artificial Intelligence Distributed Systems
Ver. June 2009
5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4
-12 1 -12 1 6+1 Mini Projec t 1 -12 1 12 1 12 1 ---
-----
------
5 4 -5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4
--
--
--
--
--Excellent -----
-----YES
-------
-----Mini projects Case studies as assignment ----
-----
-----
-----
YES ----
2011
Units
Course Theory Lab
Theory
Lab
Assessmen t through Course files/Lab Assig and nme nt / assignment Test sheets/Test papers -----------
Computer Graphics Multimedia Computing Seminar Special Topic Web Technologies (Theory & Laboratory) Object Oriented Modeling and Design (Theory & Laboratory) Mobile Computing (Theory & Laboratory) Network Management
5 5 4 -1 -2 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5
----12 1 10 + 2 Mini Project s 1 12 1 -Excellent
------
YES -----
--
--
--
--
---
---
---
--Mini projects to implement the conceptual knowledge gained -Mini projects Case studies as assignment --
Digital Image Processing
--
--
YES
--
Natural Language Processing XML Technologies Entrepreneurship and Management Enterprise Resource Planning Network Security and Cryptography
Ver. June 2009
5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4
------
------
-YES ----
--YES YES --
2011
Units
Course Theory Lab
Theory
Lab
Assessment through Course files/Lab Assig and nme assignment nt / sheets/Test Test papers ---------
Adhoc Sensor Networks Compiler Design Seminar Project Work
5 4 5 4 -1 ---
-----24 Excellent
-----
-----
Ver. June 2009
2011

PROGRAMME EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES & COURSE OBJECTIVES
1. Students will gain the ability to identify, formulate, and solve challenging IT problems. 2. Students will develop professional skills that prepare them for immediate employment or masters in Information Science and related disciplines. 3. Students will be provided with an educational foundation that prepares them for leadership roles along diverse career paths. 4. Students will develop an understanding of the social and human context in which their engineering contributions will be utilized. 5. Students will learn to communicate their ideas to be effective in collaboration with other members of engineering teams.
PROGRAM AND COURSE OUTCOMES
1. A strong foundation in core Information Science and Engineering, both theoretical and applied concepts. 2. An ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering to real-world problems. 3. Ability to model, understand, and develop complex software and information management systems. 4. An ability to function effectively within teams. 5. An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility 6. An ability to communicate effectively, both in writing and oral. 7. The broad education necessary to understand the impact of Information Science and Engineering solutions in the societal and human context 8. A recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning 9. A knowledge of contemporary issues Note: Further OB indicates Objectives and OC indicates outcomes
2011
Table 10.1 Course Modules for 2009 2013 Batch Course Linear Algebra Discrete Mathematics & Combinatorics Digital Design (Theory & Laboratory) Data Structures (Theory & Laboratory) OOP with C++ (Theory & Laboratory) Computer Architecture and Organization Methods of Applied Mathematics Analysis and Design of Algorithms (Theory & Laboratory) Object oriented Programming using Java (Theory & Laboratory) System Software Microcontrollers (Theory & Laboratory) Finite Automata and Formal Languages OB OB OB OB OB OC OC OC OC OC OC OC OC OC 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Ver. June 2009
2011
Course Data Communications Operating Systems (Theory & Laboratory) Compiler Design Web Technologies (Theory & Laboratory) Database Management Systems (Theory & Laboratory) Special Topics Computer Networks (Theory & Laboratory) Unix System Programming (Theory & Laboratory) Principles of Programming Languages (Theory & Laboratory) Software Engineering Management Information Systems XML Operations Research Special Topic Seminar
Ver. June 2009
OB OB OB OB OB OC OC OC OC OC OC OC OC OC 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
2011
Table 10.2 Course Modules for 2008 2012 Batch
Course Linear Algebra Discrete Mathematical Structures Digital Design Theory & Laboratory Data Structures Theory & Laboratory Unix and Shell Programming Theory & Laboratory Computer Architecture and Organization Methods of Applied Mathematics II Graph Theory and Combinatorics Object Oriented Programming using C++ Theory & Laboratory Database Management Systems Theory & Laboratory Microprocessors Theory & Laboratory Software Engineering
Ver. June 2009
2011
Course Finite Automata and Formal Languages Operating Systems (Theory & Laboratory) Data Communications Analysis and Design of Algorithms (Theory & Laboratory) System Software (Theory & Laboratory) Special Topics Computer Networks (Theory & Laboratory) Unix System Programming (Theory & Laboratory) Advanced Java Programming (Theory & Laboratory) Principles of Programming Languages Programming the Web Compiler Design Operations Research Multimedia Computing
Ver. June 2009
2011
Course Multicore Programming Software Project Management Special Topics Data Mining & Warehousing (Theory & Laboratory) Object Oriented Modeling and Design (Theory & Laboratory) Mobile Computing (Theory & Laboratory) CSPA Digital Image Processing Adhoc Sensor Networks Web2.0 Entrepreneurship & Management XML Enterprise Resource Planning Network Security & Cryptography Natural Language Processing
Ver. June 2009
2011
Course Embedded Computing System Cloud Computing Algorithms of Intelligent Web Term Paper Seminar Project Work
Ver. June 2009
2011
Table 10.2 Course Modules for 2007 2011 Batch Course Linear Algebra Discrete Mathematical Structures Digital Design Theory & Laboratory Object Oriented Programming using C++ Theory & Laboratory Unix and Shell Programming Theory & Laboratory Computer Architecture and Organization Complex Analysis, PDE and Numerical Methods Graph Theory and Combinatorics Data Structures Theory & Laboratory Database Management Systems Theory & Laboratory Microprocessors Theory & Laboratory Software Engineering Finite Automata and Formal Languages Operating Systems (Theory & Laboratory)
Ver. June 2009
2011
Course Data Communications Analysis and Design of Algorithms (Theory & Laboratory) System Software (Theory & Laboratory) Special Topic Computer Networks (Theory & Laboratory) Unix System Programming (Theory & Laboratory) Programming in Java (Theory & Laboratory) Software Testing Open Source Systems Data Mining and Warehousing Operations Research Artificial Intelligence Distributed Systems Computer Graphics Multimedia Computing
Ver. June 2009
2011
Course Seminar Special Topic Web Technologies (Theory & Laboratory) Object Oriented Modeling and Design (Theory & Laboratory) Mobile Computing (Theory & Laboratory) Network Management Digital Image Processing Natural Language Processing XML Technologies Entrepreneurship and Management Enterprise Resource Planning Network Security and Cryptography Adhoc Sensor Networks Compiler Design Seminar Project Work
Ver. June 2009
2011
Table 13. 1 Faculty List for 2009-2013 Batch Units Course Theory Linear Algebra Discrete Mathematics & Combinatorics Digital Design (Theory & Laboratory) Data Structures (Theory & Laboratory) OOP with C++ (Theory & Laboratory) Computer Architecture and Organization Methods of Applied Mathematics 5 4 5 3 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 --12 Mathematics Information Science / Computer Science / Computer Networks / Computer Engineering / Software Engineering Lab --12 1 12 1 12 1 Information Science / Computer Science / Computer Networks / Computer Engineering / Software Engineering Mr. Vinayaka S P Prof. Shylaja S S, Ms. Ganag Holi, Ms. Sangeetha J, Prof. Shylaja S S, Ms. Sangeetha J, Ms. Vijayakala, Mr. Vinay. A NIL Prof. Shylaja S S, Ms. Ambika T, Ms. Sharmila & Ms. Usha D Ms. Renna Sultana Area of specialization needed to achieve PEOs specified by Mathematics Name of the faculty whose expertise matched with the specialization Ms. Aparna B S Ms. Ambika T, Ms. Ganga Holi
Comments
Analysis and Design of Algorithms (Theory & Laboratory)
Prof. Shylaja S S, Ms. Ganaga Holi, Ms. Sangeetha J Ms. Vijayakala & Ms. P Ramadevi
Ver. June 2009
2011
Units Course Theory Object oriented Programming using Java (Theory & Laboratory) System Software 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 3 --12 1 Lab 12 1
Area of specialization needed to achieve PEOs specified by
Name of the faculty whose expertise matched with the specialization Ms. Ganga Holi, Mr. Karthik S, Mr. Dinesha H A & Ms. Chaitalli Prof. Shylaja S S, Mr. Karthik S, Ms. Mamatha H R, Mr. Dheeraj D Ms. Usha D & Ms. Sharmila C Ms. Ganga Holi, Mr. Karthik, Mr. Devaraj Verma C
Comments
Microcontrollers (Theory & Laboratory) Finite Automata and Formal Languages
Information Science / Computer Science / Computer Networks / Computer Engineering / Software Engineering
NIL
Ver. June 2009
2011
Table 13. 2 Faculty List for 2008-2012 Batch Units Course Theory 5 Linear Algebra Discrete Mathematical Structures Digital Design Theory & Laboratory Data Structures Theory & Laboratory Unix and Shell Programming Theory & Laboratory Computer Architecture and Organization Methods of Applied Mathematics II Graph Theory and Combinatorics 4 5 3 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 -3 5 12 -Mathematics Information Science / Computer Science / Computer Networks / Computer Engineering / Software Engineering -Ms. Ambika T, -12 1 12 1 12 1 Information Science / Computer Science / Computer Networks / Computer Engineering / Software Engineering Ms. Namitha M V Ms. Ganga Holi, Ms. Ambika T Ms. Nandini S -Mathematics Ms. Deepthy Rao Lab Area of specialization needed to achieve PEOs specified by
Name of the faculty whose expertise matched with the specialization
Comments
Prof. Shylaja S S, Ms. Ganga Holi, Ms. Sangeetha J Prof. Shylaja S S, Ms. Sumathi M, Ms. Vijayakala, Ms. Parimala
NIL
Ms. Deepthy Rao & Ms. Vrinda Kamath Ms. Ganga Holi, Ms. Ambika T
Object Oriented Programming using C++ Theory & Laboratory
Prof. Shylaja S S, Ms. Sangeetha J, Ms. Vijaykala, Mr. Vinay A
Ver. June 2009
2011
Units Course Theory Lab 6+1 Mini Project 1 12 1
Area of specializati on needed to achieve PEOs specified by
Name of the faculty whose expertise matched with the specialization
Comments
Database Management Systems Theory & Laboratory Microprocessors Theory & Laboratory
5 4 5 4 5
Prof. Shyalaja S S , Dr. S Natarajan, Ms. Mamatha H R, Ms. Sumathi
Ms. Bharathi Dr. Suthikshn Kumar, Dr. S Natarajan, Mr. Surya Prakash, Mr. Vinay A Information Science / Computer Science / Computer Networks / Computer Engineering / Software Engineering Ms. Ganag Holi, Mr. Karthik S, Mr. Devaraj Verma C Prof. Shylaja S S, Ms. Padamashree M V, Mr. Vinay A & Mr. Vinayaka S P Ms. Padmashree M V, Mr. Vinay A, Mr. Devraj Verma C Prof. Shylaja S S, Ms. Ganga Holi, Ms. Ramadevi P Prof. Shylaja S S, Ms. Mamatha H R, Mr. Karthik S, Mr. Dheeraj D All Faculty Members NIL
Software Engineering 4 Finite Automata and Formal Languages Operating Systems (Theory & Laboratory) 5 4 5 4 5 Data Communications Analysis and Design of Algorithms (Theory & Laboratory) System Software (Theory & Laboratory) Special Topics 4 5 4
--
-12 1
-12 1 6+1 Mini project 1 ---
5 4 -2
Ver. June 2009
2011
Units Course Theory 5 Computer Networks (Theory & Laboratory) Unix System Programming (Theory & Laboratory) Advanced Java Programming (Theory & Laboratory) Principles of Programming Languages 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 Programming the Web 4 5 Compiler Design Operations Research Multimedia Computing Multicore Programming Special Topics 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 -2 -------Lab 12 1 12 1 12 1
Area of specializati on needed to achieve PEOs specified by
Name of the faculty whose expertise matched with the specialization Dr. Suthikshn Kumar, Dr. S Natarajan, Ms. Mamatha H R, Ms Prof. Sangeetha S, Ms. Shylaja S J Ganga Holi, Ms. Parimala R Ms. Ganag Holi,
Comments
Mr. Karthik S, Information Science / Ms. Sangeetha J, Mr. Computer Science / Vinay A, Ms. Parimala R Computer Ms. Ganag Holi, Mr. Networks / Computer Karthik S, Ms. Engineering Malashree / Software Engineering Mr. Karthik S, Mr. Devraj Verma C, Mr. Dheeraj D Mr. Karthik S , Mr. Vinayak S P Dr. S Natarajan, Mr. Karthik S Ms. Ambika T All Faculty Members
NIL
Ver. June 2009
2011
Table 13. 2 Faculty List for 2007-2011 Batch Units Course Area of specializatio n needed to achieve PEOs specified by Mathematics
Theor y 5 4 5 3 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 3 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4
Lab --12 1 12 1 12 1
Name of the faculty whose expertise matched with the specialization Ms. Vrunda Kamath Ms. Ambika T, Ms. Nandini S
Comments
Linear Algebra Discrete Mathematical Structures Digital Design Theory & Laboratory Object Oriented Programming using C++ Theory & Laboratory Unix and Shell Programming Theory & Laboratory Computer Architecture and Organization Complex Analysis, PDE and Numerical Methods Graph Theory and Combinatorics Data Structures Theory & Laboratory Database Management Systems Theory & Laboratory Microprocessors Theory & Laboratory Software Engineering
Dr. Srikanta Murthy K Prof. Shylaja S S, Ms. Usha, Ms. Vijaykala Mr. Vinay A, Prof. Shylaja S S, Ms. Deepthi K Prasad, Ms. Sumathi M, Ms. Parimala R Ms. Nagasundari S, Ms. Ambika T
---12 1 6+1 Mini Project 1 12 1 -Information Science / Computer Science / Computer Networks / Computer Engineering / Software Engineering Mathematics
Ms. Aparana Ms. Ganga Holi, Ms. Ambika T, Ms. Nandini S Prof. Shylaja S S, Ms. Ganga Holi, Ms. Sangeetha J Dr. S Natarajan, Ms. Mamatha H R, Ms. Sumathi M, Ms. Parimala R Ms. Poornima Lokesh, Dr. SrikantaMurthy K, Dr. Suthkishn Kumar, Mr. Narendra U P, Mr. Vinay. A
NIL
Ver. June 2009
2011
Units Course
Theor y 5 4 5
Lab
Area of specializatio n needed to achieve PEOs specified by
Name of the faculty whose expertise matched with the specialization Ms. Ganga Holi, Mr. Karthik S Ms. Padmashree M V, Mr. Vinay A Ms. Padmashree M V, Ms. Sangeetha J, Mr. Vinay A Ms. Ganga Holi, Ms. Vijaykala Prof. Shylaja S S, Ms. Mamatha H R, Mr. Karthik S All Faculty Members Ms. Padmashree, , Ms. Sangeetha J Prof. Shylaja S S, Ms. Ganga Holi, Ms. Parimala R Ms. Ganga Holi, Ms. Nagasundari S, Mr. Karthik S Mr. Harihara, Mr.Vinay Dr. S Natarajan Mr. Karthik S Dr. S Natarajan Mr. Vinay A, Ms. Parimala R, Ms. Meera V,
Comments
Finite Automata and Formal Languages Operating Systems (Theory & Laboratory)
-12 1
4 5
Data Communications Analysis and Design of Algorithms (Theory & Laboratory) System Software (Theory & Laboratory) Special Topic Computer Networks (Theory & Laboratory) Unix System Programming (Theory & Laboratory) Programming in Java (Theory & Laboratory)
4 5 4 5 4 -5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4
-12 1 6+1 Mini Project 1 -12 1 12 1 12 1 ------
NIL
Open Source Systems Data Mining and Warehousing Operations Research Artificial Intelligence Distributed Systems
Ver. June 2009
2011
Units Course
Theor y 5 4 -1 -2 5 4
Lab ---12 1 10 + 2 Mini Project s 1 12 1 --------24
Area of specializatio n needed to achieve PEOs specified by
Name of the faculty whose expertise matched with the specialization Dr. S Natarajan, Mr. Karthik S All Faculty Members All Faculty Members Ms. Chaitali C & Ms. Malashree S Ms. Padamashree M V, Mr. Vinay A, Mr. Dinesha H A
Comments
Multimedia Computing Seminar Special Topic Web Technologies (Theory & Laboratory) Object Oriented Modeling and Design (Theory & Laboratory) Mobile Computing (Theory & Laboratory) XML Technologies Entrepreneurship and Management Network Security and Cryptography Adhoc Sensor Networks Compiler Design Seminar Project Work
5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 -1 ---
Dr. Suthikshn Kumar, Mr. Prakash C O Mr. Surya Prakash Dr. S Natarajan, Mr. Vinay. A Dr. Suthikshn Kumar, Ms. Sangeetha J Mr. Amarnath J L, Ms. Usha D Mr. Karthik S, Mr. Dheeraj, Mr. Devraj Verma C All Faculty Members All Faculty Members
NIL
Ver. June 2009
2011
P E S INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION SCIENCE & ENGINEERING ANNEXURE 14 P.E.S INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, BANGALORE-85. C A L E N D A R O F EV E N T S BE II, IV, VI Semester (Autonomous scheme) Day Wee k No Mont h Mon Tue We d Thu Fri 21 FA M 28 Session: Jan May 2011 No. of wor Activities Sat king days 17th - Commencement of 22 5 classes, course registration 29 5 PT M 12 4 26th Republic day 1st Wed TT Course withdrawal 12th, 13th Aatma Trisha 16th Id-Milad 19th Science Fest
1.
Jan
17
18 25 EW D 1 EW D 8 EW D 15 EW D 22 EW D 1 T1 8 EW D 15 EW D 22 EW D 29 EW D
19 26 H 2
20
2.
Jan
24
27
3. 4.
Feb
31
3 10
4 11 18 CC M 25 4 T1 11 ASD 18 CC M 25 1 CC M
5 5
Feb
9 16 H 23 2 H 9 BB V 16
5.
Feb
14
17
19
6. 7. 8.
Feb Feb/M ar Mar
21 28 T1 7 BBV 14
24 3 T1 10 BB V 17
26 5 T1 12
5 5 5 T1 Test1 2nd - Mahashivaratri
9. 10.
Mar
19 26 PT M 2
Mar Mar/A pr
21
23
24
11.
28
30
31
Ver. June 2009
2011
12.
Apr
4 H
5 EWD
6 FA M
7 LT
8 LT
4th Chandramana Ugadi LT - Lab Test (during respective lab sessions) 14thDr. Ambedkar Jayanthi 15t Compensatory Holiday 16th Mahaveer Jayanti LT- Lab Test (during respective lab sessions) T2 Test 2 and Quiz 22nd Good Friday LWD- Last Working Day Study Holidays IOH Issue of Hall Tickets 6th Basava Jayanthi Theory Exams Practical Exams/Seminar for special topics
13.
Apr
11 LT
12 LT
13 LT
14 H
15 CH
16 H 23 T 2 30 7 I O H 14 21 28 4 11 18 25 2 9 16 23 30 6 13
14. 15.
Apr Apr
18 T2 25
19 T2 26
20 T2 27 BBV 4 FAS D 11 18 25 1 8 AO R 15 22 29 6 13 20 27 3 10
21 T2 28 BBV 5 IOH 12 19 26 2 9 16 23 30 7 14 21 28 4 11
22 H 29 LWD 6 H 13 20 27 3 10 17 24 1 8 15 22 29 5 12
5 5
16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30.
H
May May May May May/Ju ne June June June June/Ju ly July July July July Aug Aug
2 9 16 23 30 6 13 20 27 4 11 18 25 1 8
3 10 17 24 31 7 14 21 28 5 12 19 26 2 9
30th May to 11th June-vacation 8th - Announcement of Results 9th 11th Registration for summer term 13th - Commencement of Summer term 13th June to 12th Aug Mandatory training for non summer term students
Exams and Evaluation
: Holiday
BBV: Blue Book Verification (3.45 to 4.45PM) FAM: Faculty Advisors meeting ASD: Attendance and sessional marks display
EWD: Extended working day PTM: Parents teachers meet at 10.30AM FASD: Final Attendance and sessional marks display
Ver. June 2009

Pesit Ise Sar Nba 2011

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Исходное описание:

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Pesit Ise Sar Nba 2011

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

P E S Institute of Technology

Department of Information Science & Engineering

Self Assessment Report (SAR) for NBA Accreditation

PES INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

National Board of Accreditation

Department of Information Science & Engineering

Ver. June 2009

NBA Accreditation of UG Engineering Program

Page 2 of 193 pages

Department of Information Science & Engineering

Place: Bangalore Date:

Ver. June 2009

NBA Accreditation of UG Engineering Program

Page 3 of 193 pages

Department of Information Science & Engineering

PART I INSTITUTIONAL SUMMARY (Criteria I and II)

Department of Information Science & Engineering

Year of Establishment 1988 1988 1988 1998 1999 2002 2006

120 120 120 120 120 120 120 840

Year of Establishment 1997 1997

Ver. June 2009

NBA Accreditation of UG Engineering Program

Department of Information Science & Engineering

I.0.6. Nature of Trust / Society: Registered Public Society

Ver. June 2009

NBA Accreditation of UG Engineering Program

Page 6 of 193 pages

Department of Information Science & Engineering

2011 Evaluators Space

Name of the Internal Source Students Fee Others

606 + 311 260 + 133

Ver. June 2009

NBA Accreditation of UG Engineering Program

Page 7 of 193 pages

Department of Information Science & Engineering

2011 Evaluators Space

infrastructure (5) Physical resources

Department of Information Science & Engineering

2011 Evaluators Space

Department of Information Science & Engineering

Rented # in waiting Nil

Number of Rooms 29 117 34 36 153 40 81 39 172

Ver. June 2009

NBA Accreditation of UG Engineering Program

Page 10 of 193 pages

Department of Information Science & Engineering

I-I.1.5 Transportation facility and canteen (5)

Exclusive/State-transport - Exclusive Facility availed by Students and staff

Yes Sitting space 432 sq.m Daily Usage 432 sq.m

Source of water supply to campus: 05 bore wells in campus

Department of Information Science & Engineering

I-I.2 Organization, governance and transparency (20)

Ver. June 2009

NBA Accreditation of UG Engineering Program

Page 12 of 193 pages

Department of Information Science & Engineering

2011 Evaluators Space

Financial Adviser UGC

State Govt. Nominee

Former Deputy Director IIT-R

Regional Officer AICTE

Principal & Director PES School of Engineering