OPMBCS

Table of Contents
Foreword Acknowledgment Part I I. Introduction II. Assessment of the Operational Plan for the Manila Bay Coastal Strategy (OPMBCS) III. Updating of the OPMBCS A. Process Flow B. Strategy Framework C. Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) of Stakeholders Agencies IV. Management Action Plan Targets A. Issue-Based Action Plan 1. Water Pollution 2. Degradation and Overexploitation of Habitats and Resources 3. Partnership and Governance B. Area-Based/ Major River Basin Action Plan V. Financial Strategy VI. Implementing Arrangements VII. Appendices A. List of Acronyms and Abbreviations B. Definition of Terms VIII. References Part II I. Issue-Based Action Plan A. Water Pollution Action Plan B. Habitats and Resources Action Plan C. Partnership and Governance Action Plan II. Area-Based/ River Basin A. Pampanga River System B. Marilao - Meycauayan - Obando River System 54 83 93 118 119 164 1 3 7 7 10 13 18 18 18 22 25 28 29 32 34 34 40 50 i ii
OPERATIONAL PLAN FOR THE MANILA BAY COASTAL STRATEGY (OPMBCS)
UPDATED VERSION 2011
FOREWORD
The Process of saving Manila Bay from further environmental degradation is accelerating. As the latest output, we are launching the Operational Plan for the Manila Bay Coastal Strategy (OPMBCS) 2011-2015. This Operational Plan is the product of collaboration among the 14 agencies mandated by a Supreme Court decision (G.R. Nos. 171947-48, December 18, 2008) to clean, rehabilitate and preserve our historic and scenic Manila Bay. This Plan focuses on addressing the three most urgent concerns: informal settlers along the waterways, solid waste management, and liquid waste management. The Plan is a step up from the 2005 OPMBCS and draws inspiration from success stories and lessons learned from the past. Thus, it goes beyond the biological aspects of mangroves, fisheries, forests and agriculture. The Plan maps the activities that will effectively arrest the degradation of Manila Bay and yield immediate results. The collaborative approach adopted is not just among the 14 agencies, but encompasses public-private partnerships. It is through this approach that we shall surmount the obstacles ahead. We are now primed to implement the Plan. The stage is set for participatory solutions to unfold. And so, without further ado, let us get moving together, and start converting our vision of a clean and vibrant Manila Bay to a living reality. Mabuhay!
RAMON J. P. PAJE
DENR Secretary/ Chairman, Manila Bay Coordinating Committee
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The updated Operational Plan of the Manila Bay Coastal Strategy is a product of concerted effort of the following mandamus and cooperating agencies and technical working groups, in close collaboration with the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR), through the Manila Bay Coordinating Office (MBCO): The Mandamus Agencies Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) Department of Interior and Local Government and its Regional Offices (R3,NCR,R4A) Department of Agriculture (DA) Bureau of Soils and Water Management (BSWM) Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR) Bureau of Agricultural Statistics (BAS) Bureau of Animal Industry (BAI) Fertilizer and Pesticide Authority (FPA) National Fisheries Research Development Institute (NFRDI) Philippine Rice Research Institute (PhilRice) Agricultural Training Institute (ATI) Department of Budget and Management (DBM) Department of Education (DepEd) Department of Health (DOH) Philippine Ports Authority (PPA) Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) Metro Manila Development Authority (MMDA) Metropolitan Waterworks and Sewerage System (MWSS) Local Water Utilities Administration (LWUA) Philippine National Police - Maritime Group (PNP Maritime Group) The Cooperating Agencies: National Housing Authority (NHA) Maritime Industry Authority (MARINA) Philippine Nuclear Research Institute (PNRI) Philippine Navy (PN) Maynilad Water Services Incorporated (MWSI) Manila Water Company Incorporated (MWCI)
ii
DENR offices and attached agencies : DENR NCR and MBCO-Site Management Office DENR-Region 3 and MBCO-Site Mgt. Office DENR Region 4A and MBCO - Site Mgt. Office Laguna Lake Development Authority (LLDA) Protected Area and Wildlife Bureau (PAWB) National Water Resources Board (NWRB) Mines and Geo - Sciences Bureau (MGB) Forest Management Bureau (FMB) Pasig River Rehabilitation Commission (PRRC) Environmental Management Bureau and Regional Offices (NCR, R3, and R4A) River Basin Control Office (RBCO) National Solid Waste Management Commission (NSWMC) Partnerships for the Environmental Management of the Seas of East Asia (PEMSEA). Special mention is given to the all out support of the DENR officials
Hon. Ramon J. P. Paje, Secretary Demetrio L. Ignacio, Jr. - Undersecretary for Policy and Planning Atty. Analiza Rebuelta - Teh - Undersecretary and Chief of Staff Corazon C. Davis - Assistant Secretary, Administration and Finance Angelito V. Fontanilla - Director Finance and Management Services
iii
I. Introduction
The Manila Bay, a maritime inlet of the West Philippine Sea formerly South China Sea, is situated within the administrative boundaries of three (3) regions of the Philippines- the National Capital Region (NCR) on the eastern coast, Region 3 or Central Luzon on the northern and western coast, and Region 4A or Southern Luzon on the southern coast (see Figure 1: Map of Manila Bay area). The basin covers an area of around 17,000 sq. km., and is about 11 times the area of the bay, which is approximately 1,800 sq. km. The coastline is 190 km. (Manila Bay Area Environmental Atlas, 2007).
Figure 1: Map of Manila Bay Area
Manila Bay is strategically located, and serves as the gateway to the main political, economic, and social centre of the country. This area contributes about 54.6 % of the countrys gross domestic product (GDP) (NSCB-2010, August). However, though an important economic resource, it has multiple and conflicting uses. Major environmental problems include degradation of habitats, deterioration of water quality, coastal erosion and siltation, overexploitation of fishery resource, and loss of biodiversity. The lack of facilities for the treatment of domestic and industrial wastes, magnifying health risks, has become an increasing concern for the government. Even the aesthetic value of Manila Bay, famous for its sunset and beach, can no longer be enjoyed like what people have been accustomed to due to pollution, aquaculture structures and reclamation. Moreover, the management of Manila Bay is hampered by socio-political and inter-agency conflicts. As such, more than 27.6 million of people living in the basin area and the rest of the country have been affected by this condition (NSO 2007 Population Census). The Philippine Environment Monitor 2003 reports that the water quality of the three regions covering the Manila Bay is considered critical and unsatisfactory (U) in rating. The indiscriminate disposal of domestic wastewater is the main cause of the degradation of water quality in Manila Bay. Other sources of pollution come from the industrial and commercial establishments. The non-point sources of pollution, such as the sediments or nutrients from catchment/basin run offs, also significantly contribute to the continuing deterioration of the bays water quality and ecosystems. These sources of pollution discharge harmful substances directly into the bay and its waterways. These pollutants will affect human health due to the spread of water-borne diseases
1
and subsequently lead to economic losses. These threats have resulted to increasing infrastructure and rehabilitation cost as well as social expenditures. Addressing the causes of pollution through the implementation of appropriate actions would help in improved health, increase agricultural and fishery productivity, and thereby achieve a better quality of life. The Manila Bay Coastal Strategy (MBCS), a guiding instrument with a vision of Manila Bay - reflective of Gods glory - is a clean, wholesome, and productive ecosystem, a center for socio-economic development, and a natural heritage nurtured by Filipino values towards a better quality of life for present and future generations, was produced through a unified effort of various stakeholders of the Manila Bay region.
Vision: Manila Bay - reflective of Gods glory - is a clean, wholesome, and productive ecosystem, a center for socio - economic development, and a natural heritage nurtured by Filipino values towards a better quality of life for present and future generations.
In 2005, the MBCS was translated into action plans and programs based on the identified priority areas of concern, is entitled Operational Plan for the Manila Bay Coastal Strategy (OPMBCS). The Plan entails the integration of practical lessons learned in the course of the implementation of the Manila Bay Environmental Management Project (MBEMP), which was completed in 2006 and was set for full implementation upon signing of the MBCC Resolution in February 2006. The Operational Plan has addressed priority issues/areas of concern on water pollution, habitats and resources, and partnership and governance. Each of these issues has a set of objectives and action plans with measurable targets, timeframe, and budgetary requirements. It also contains implementing arrangements - responsible agency/sector/partner, enabling policies and laws, and financing strategy. This Plan, as intended for adoption and implementation by national and local levels of government, communities, NGOs, the private sector, scientific and research institutions, and other stakeholders in the Manila Bay Region, was approved for adoption by the Manila Bay Project Coordinating Committee (MBPCC) on February 8, 2006.
II. Assessment of the Operational Plan for the Manila Bay Coastal Strategy (OPMBCS)
Based on the review of past efforts and initiatives, tremendous efforts have been made by public entities and by government agencies on the development and use of the Bays natural resources. In the 70s, the concern was fisheries with improvements in the production and use of effective and efficient fishing gears and harvesting methods as the main issue. In the late 80s and 90s, the focus shifted to the Bays ecosystem, including the effects of over exploitation of resources, economic and industrial development, and population pressures in the surrounding watershed. Among the initiatives that have been introduced in the Manila Bay region was the The Regional Programme on Building Partnerships in Environmental Management for the Seas of East Asia (PEMSEA). Manila Bay has been identified as one of the three sub-regional sea areas/ pollution hot spots in the Southeast Asian region. The conduct of Environmental Risk Assessment, together with other related studies, became the bases for the Manila Bay Coastal Strategy and its operational plan (OPMBCS), developed in 2001 and 2005, respectively. The DENR is tasked to fully implement the OPMBCS . Its main role is to coordinate, convene, and monitor the mandamus agencies implementation of the OPMBCS. The DENR has very limited capacity to leverage and coordinate investments of other agencies that would contribute to the improvement of water quality of the Bay. Indeed, Manila Bay is everybodys problem, but nobodys responsibility. In 2007, the Manila Bay Coordinating Office (MBCO), created under the River Basin Coordinating Office (RBCO), was tasked to coordinate the implementation of the OPMBCS. Below is the chronology of events on the updating of the OPMBCS:
A. Supreme Court Ruling of December 18, 2008

The Manila Bay Clean up is not just an ordinary government project. It is the execution of a Supreme Court decision on December 18, 2008 by virtue of a writ of continuing mandamus that makes this Project imperative and be treated with the highest priority. Hence, the activities of the Supreme Courts Manila Bay Advisory Committee (MBAC) in relation to the clean up are part of the judicial process. The instructions of the Supreme Court to fully implement the OPMBCS for the rehabilitation, restoration, and conservation of the Manila Bay at the earliest possible time was directed to the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) as lead agency. It is ordered to call regular coordination meetings with concerned government depart-
ments and agencies to ensure the successful implementation of the plan of action in ance with each indicated completion schedules.
accord-
The Supreme Court rendered a decision in G.R.No. 171947-48 ordering the defendant - government agencies, namely:
1. Metropolitan Manila Development Authority (MMDA) 2. Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) 3. Department of Education (DepED) 4. Department of Health (DOH) 5. Department of Agriculture - Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (DA/BFAR) 6. Department of Agriculture - Bureau of Soils and Water Management (DA/BSWM) 7. Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) 8. Department of Budget and Management (DBM) 9. Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) 10. Philippine National Police - Maritime Group (PNP- Maritime Group) 11. Department of Interior and Local Government (DILG) 12. Philippine Ports Authority (PPA) 13. Metropolitan Waterworks and Sewerage System (MWSS) 14. Local Water Utilities Administration (LWUA)
to clean up, rehabilitate, and preserve Manila Bay, and restore and maintain its waters to SB level (Class B sea waters per Water Classification Tables under DENR Administrative Order No.34, 1990) to make them fit for swimming, skin diving, and other forms of contact recreation. These mandamus agencies shall, from finality of this Decision, submit to the Court a quarterly progress report of the activities undertaken in accordance with this Decision.
B. Compliance from 2008 to 2010 MISSION: To clean up, rehabilitate, and preserve Manila Bay, and restore and maintain its waters to SB level to make them fit for swimming, skin diving, and other forms of contact recreation.
In the course of the implementation of the OPMBCS, it has been noted that minimal efforts have been undertaken. Based on the assessment done by the Manila Bay Advisory Committee (MBAC) on the quarterly reports submitted by the mandamus agencies, there were issues/concerns raised that the defendant agencies have to address, such as:
The lack of consistency, adequacy, and timeliness of reports; The absence of standard format to facilitate objective reviews and verification of the
accomplishments;
The variation in the reported results and data/information vary each reporting period; The need for a benchmark/time - bound target as against the accomplishments; and The need for a good quality and comparable set of data
Such development led to the issuance of the DENR Administrative Order No. 2011-01, dated January 17, 2011, strengthening the Manila Bay Coordinating Office (MBCO) by placing it directly under the Office of the Secretary (OSEC). The MBCO is tasked to facilitate the efficient and effective implementation of the Operational Plan for the Manila Bay Coastal Strategy (OPMBCS), including the rationalization of the OPMBCS priority actions and reporting systems. This is also in line with the Aide Memoire of the Seventh Implementation Review of the World Banks National Program Support for Environment and Natural Resources Management Project in November 2010 given the importance of the task at hand.
C. Compliance on the February 15, 2011 Supreme Court Decision

As a result of the assessment made by the MBAC and to be able to come-up with a cohesive OPMBCS, the Supreme Court gave a directive to the DENR to take the lead in the review and updating of the 2005 Plan, including the time plan and the rationalization of the OPMBCS priority actions and reporting systems, and submit the same to the Supreme Court on or before June 30, 2011. The DENR is also ordered to submit the summarized report on the overall quality of Manila Bay waters for all four quarters of 2010 on or before June 30, 2011. Furthermore, the DENR is ordered to submit the names and addresses of persons and companies in Metro Manila, Rizal, Laguna, Cavite, Bulacan, Pampanga, and Bataan that generate toxic and hazardous waste on or before September 30, 2011.
D. Rationale for Updating of the OPMBCS

The OPMBCS has to be updated and enhanced to be able to come-up with a more realistic, cohesive, and participatory plan taking into consideration other gaps and constraints that need to be further addressed to effectively and efficiently implement the OPMBCSs activities, such as:
1. Absence of baseline data/information to support the application of appropriate corrective measures/ actions in rehabilitating the Manila Bay; 2. Overlapping/duplicating jurisdiction of department agencies in Manila Bay and its watershed areas yet no single agency has the full responsibility for the management of the Manila Bay; 3. Lack of full commitment by NGAs and other stakeholders to carry out the OPMBCS; 4. Inadequacy in the monitoring and enforcing activity due to lack of resources for having a comprehensive compliance monitoring program; 5. Lack of scientific and technical information to support management decisions on the rehabilitation and preservation of the Manila Bay 6. Stakeholder agencies environmental monitoring programs not complementary and inadequate in scope/coverage to be able to come-up with a real situation of the bays ecosystem health and water quality. 7. Lack of infrastructure (sewerage and centralized sewage treatment facilities in highly populated areas (These are mostly identified by PEMSEA)
This version of the OPMBCS has recognized and acknowledged the valuable contributions of partner stakeholder agencies. The Plan, meant to be dynamic, subject to change and improvement in the course of its implementation to better address the three (3) important and immediate priorities, namely; solid waste management; liquid and septic waste management, and informal settlers along the waterways. The action plans/programs will also be proactive with the application of the management strategy evaluation scheme that will be put in place. In anticipation, there might be some activities that are not included in the Plan but can be implemented as there are needs for them in the realization of the OPMBCS goal. The plan also identifies projects and activities that will have immediate impact in areas covering the major river systems as identified in the management action plan from the period 2011 to 2012. It also intends to come up with the long-term plan soon after a mid-term assessment of the OPMBCS implementation sometime in late 2013 or early 2014.
Three immediate concerns: Solid waste management, Liquid waste management, and Informal settlers along the waterways
III. Updating of the OPMBCS

A. Process Flow
The DENR spearheaded the various Inter-agency stakeholders meetings and workshops among mandamus agencies. A series of discussions was spent on the identified stakeholder agencies key performance indicators (KPIs) as these were not acceptable to some of the defendant-agencies. It was explained that the identification and development of the KPIs of each of the mandamus agencies have been discussed and finalized with them by the Supreme Court. For agencies with conflicting and overlapping mandates, responsibilities were defined and assigned appropriately through clustering to facilitate easy planning process.. For each components action plan of the OPMBCS, a wide-range of processes has been done, from one on one discussion between the MBCO and the focal persons of each concerned agencies. Stakeholder agencies, likewise, initiated the conduct of meetings with their relevant partners for having inter-related activities for their Key Performance Indicators and came-up with their collective action plans. The Site Coordinating Committees (SCCs), which consist of stakeholder agencies representatives at the regional level, met to discuss and finalize their corresponding outputs for the development of the agencys respective final action plan. Such efforts have to be sustained to be able to attain the objective of addressing the Manila Bays concerns on water pollution, waste and toxic hazardous, informal settlers and the improvement and recovery of critical habitats and resources. Inputs in the form of action targets and outcomes were delivered and submitted by agencies concerned that comprised the updated version of the OPMBCS. (see Figure 2: Flowchart for the Updating of OPMBCS).
B. Strategy Framework
Taking into considerations the assessment made on the 2005 OPMBCS implementation, the updating of the plan is governed by the strategy framework as presented below in Figure 3: Strategy Framework Plan.
Figure 3: Strategy Framework Plan
The revised OPMBCS strategy framework focuses on the issue-based concerns: the pollution reduction, habitat protection and restoration, and the areabased/major river system. These areas of concern are to be supported by action plan on governance and partnerships, which shall serve as the enablers of various management targets and management outcomes of the 2011-2015 Action Plan. This framework directly identifies the management targets and their corresponding management outcomes which are operationalized in each of the components action plan. Specifically, the identified management targets have considered the KPIs of all the mandamus agencies as these are further addressed by the action plan. Notably, the Plan calls for the establishment of databases as this is deemed imperative in coming-up with the baseline data and information, which shall be the basis for developing appropriate/alternative courses of actions/measures to effectively and efficiently address the Manila Bays issues/problems.
10
With the wide range of gaps and constraints, said strategy framework aims the following:
To improve the quality of the waters in the Manila Bay and its tributaries ( rivers, lakes, streams) and ensure that they are safe and for various uses (e.g. recreation, irrigation, transportation, fisheries and other living resources, sources of potable water); To recognizes the importance of improved water quality of the bay and recovered marine and coastal ecosystems in uplifting the economic status of various stakeholders; To Include pollution from non-point sources, in particular from run offs; To recognize the need for the construction of sewer lines and septage treatment facilities; To identify and link the plans and strategies for water pollution and habitats and restoration in areas of concerns; To have a five (5) year nominal time plan but also contains actions and activities that needs longer time lines; To adopt the area based/major river system approach wherein various stakeholders can appropriately identify, develop and implement their specific OPMBCS plans/activities; To harmonizes and/or implement important policy guidelines, best practices and other relevant scientific approaches; To promote the partnership and governance as enabling action to implement good environmental management governance thereby achieving the sustainable development of the Manila Bay Region.
The plan will also employ the ecosystem-based management planning and monitoring mechanisms. Management arrangements based on the needs of the ecosystems, rather than upon political or administrative expediency will be established and emphasized. Such good practices, especially at the level of upland and coastal communities, participatory, integrative and cooperative approaches are brought into full play. Ecosystem-based management (EBM) is an integrated, science-based approach to the management of natural resources that aims to sustain the health, resilience and diversity of an ecosystem while allowing it for sustainable use by humans of the goods and services they provide (EBM approach White, Lopez and Peralta 2007). With the common resources to be managed in the Bays area such as agriculture, fisheries and forestry resources, it is expected that any improvement that will be observed in these sectors may serve as an initial indicator of success through the participation of all the major stakeholders of the Manila Bay region. The check and balance system is inherent in the Plan as this will ensure the accountability, transparency, and responsibility not only of the stakeholder agencies, but also the other partners (business community, industry or NGOs, and LGUs) in the implementation of the updated OPMBCS.
11
C. Key Performance Indicators of Stakeholder Agencies

Enumerated below are the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) of agencies ordered by the Supreme Court to be submitted in a quarterly reports electronically using the forms prescribed by the Supreme Court in its Final Order, dated February 15, 2011, in G.R.Nos.171947-48. Agencies may also add other key performance indicators that they have identified. AGENCY 1. DENR KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (KPIs) 1. % of total number of planned activities completed in the revised OPMBCS (MBCO) 2. % of estimated total pollution loading from industrial and commercial sources in the Manila Bay Region that is treated in accordance with DENR-EMB standards (EMB,LLDA) 3. % of industrial/commercial firms operating within Manila Bay region that is in compliance with required effluent discharge permits and meeting effluent standards (EMB, LLDA) 4. % of measures enacted and enforce to manage/ban the dumping of toxic and hazardous dredge spoils or waste into the Manila Bay system (EMB) 5. % of geo- referenced and integrated water quality monitoring site results that comply with the DENR standards for Class C (Pasig River and Laguna Lake) or Class SB (Manila Bay). (EMB, PRCC, LLDA) 6. % of budget increase for Manila bay rehabilitation activities 7. # of IEC activities 1. % of commercial establishments and homes along riverbanks and shorelines of Manila Bay watershed area that are inspected for adequate treatment facilities/ septic tanks 2. % of total non compliant establishments and homes that construct wastewater treatment facilities/septic tanks following inspection 3. % of LGUs in Manila bay watershed areas outside Metro Manila that are certified as compliant with regulations governing. a) 10 year Sold Waste Management Plan, b) Segregation at source, c) segregated collection, d) composted, recycled and reused, e) disposed residual waste in approved disposal site, f) solid waste management (RA 9003), g) informal settlers and illegal encroachments (permanently cleared) 4. % of LGUs implementing their Water Quality Plan in compliance with RA 9275 5. # of IEC activities
2. DILG
13
AGENCY 3. MWSS
KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (KPIs) 1. % of water-served population and area covered by sewerage and sanitation treatment facilities 2. % of domestic pollution loading that is treated in accordance with current regulations and standards 3. % of estimated total septage desludged that are treated in accordance with current regulations and standards 4. Amount collected for sewerage and sanitation services 5. Amount invested for sewerage and sanitation facilities (capital expenditure) 6. # of IEC activities 1. % of residential, institutional, commercial, and industrial establishments connected and served by wastewater treatment facilities 2. % of total domestic pollution loading that is treated in accordance with current regulations and standards 3. % of estimated total septage desludged that are treated in accordance with current regulations and standards 4. % of water-served population and area covered by sewerage and sanitation facilities 5. Amount of funds collected by water districts for sanitation and sewerage services 6. Amount invested for sewerage and sanitation facilities (capital expenditures) 7. # of IEC activities
4. LWUA
5. DA BSWM
1. % reduction of estimated total pollution loading from agricultural and livestock sources in the Manila Bay River Basin region 2. # of IEC activities 1. % of patrols/operations conducted in the Manila Bay system to ensure enforcement of PD 979, RA 8550 and RA 9993 and other laws designed to prevent marine pollution 2. % of apprehended violators of PD 979, RA 8550, RA 9993 and other laws designed to prevent marine pollution that are prosecuted and penalized 3. # of other projects and activities related to environmental protection and improvement of water quality of Manila Bay 4. % of IEC activities
6. PCG
14
AGENCY 7. PNP-MG
KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (KPIs) 1. % of patrols/operations conducted in the Manila Bay system to ensure enforcement of RA 8550 and other laws and ordinances designed to prevent marine pollution 2. % of apprehended violators of RA 8550 and other laws and ordinances designed to prevent marine pollution that is prosecuted and penalized 3. # of other projects and activities related to environmental protection and improvement of water quality of Manila Bay 4. # of IEC activities 1. % of estimated total pollution loading from bilge water and solid and liquid waste that is collected and treated in accordance with current regulations and standards 2. % of ports and terminals with adequate solid and liquid waste reception facilities, treatment procedures and funding requirements for treatment/disposal of ship-generated waste 3. # of IEC activities 1. % of estimated total area and number of illegal encroachments/informal settlers along Metro Manila water bodies that are permanently cleared in accordance with current laws and relocation provisions 2. % of estimated total volume of generated solid waste in Metro Manila that is collected in accordance with current regulations and standards. a) composted, b) recycled and reused, c) residual materials processed, d) disposal, e) over all diversion rate 3. % available storage capacity of sanitary landfills serving Metro Manila that is established in accordance with current regulations and standards 4. % of spoils and solid waste dredged from waterways that are disposed of in accordance with current rules and regulations 5. % of apprehended violators of RA 9003, RA 9275 and other existing laws on pollution who are prosecuted and penalized 6. # of IEC activities 1. % of estimated total area of illegal encroachments/informal settlers along water bodies of Bulacan, Pampanga, Cavite and Laguna that are permanently cleared in accordance with current laws and relocation provisions 2. # of IEC activities
8. PPA
9. MMDA
10. DPWH
15
AGENCY 11. DOH
KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (KPIs) 1. % of septic and sludge handling/treatment companies that are inspected and certified as being compliant with current regulations and standards 2. % of septic and sludge handling/treatment companies that have valid Environmental Sanitary Clearances (ESC) issued by DOH 3. # of IEC activities 1. # of Environmental Education, Information and Education (EEIC) program materials and lessons prepared regarding the Manila Bay clean-up 2. # of students who completed a DepEd Environmental Education, Information and Education (EEIC) regarding the Manila Bay clean-up 3. # of students who have participated in clean up activities within the Manila Bay system area 4. # of IEC activities
12. DepEd
16
IV.
Management Action Plan Targets
The issue-based and area-based Action Plans will focus in addressing the problems of point and non-point sources of pollution; habitat and resources protection and conservation; and the barriers under the partnerships and governance. Correspondingly, these areas of concerns are supported by implementing the partnership and governance action plans. Management targets and outcome will be attained by the implementation of various programs/projects indicated in the action plan within the period of five (5) years. These program targets are further transformed into a yearly work and financial plan. The management targets require the implementation of both action and research projects to ensure that the Manila Bays water and its resources will be cleaned-up, restored, preserved, and soon be classified as SB (fit for recreational activities). To achieve this goal, rehabilitation of the existing laboratories, purchase of trash boats, 50- footer water quality monitoring vessel, among others, and the conduct of various studies (i.e., determination of total maximum daily load for Manila Bay, determination of total loading discharges), and the cleaning up program for the twelve (12) major river systems will be carried out within the next two (2) years. Some of the expected management outcomes out will not be delivered within the next five (5) years but beginning of relevant actions within this period is necessary if long-term targets are to be achieved.
A. Issue-Based Action Plan

1. Water Pollution This component of the OPMBCS is aimed at protecting the waters in Manila Bay and its tributaries (rivers and lakes) and ensuring that they are safe for various uses (e.g. recreation, irrigation, transportation, fisheries and other living resources, sources of potable water). The identified priority activities under this issue address the liquid and solid waste management.
18
Liquid Waste Management The reduction of pollution load from point and non-point sources will be done through the delineation of the water quality management areas, rehabilitation/cleaningup of the target major river systems, establishment and construction of sewerage systems and septage treatment facilities by concerned agencies/entities. A total of fourteen (14) river systems will be rehabilitated over the next five (5) years. Appropriate guidelines, criteria and standards for collection, treatment, recycling and disposal of agricultural and aquaculture wastes shall be developed by the DA/ BSWM/BFAR. Inspection of houses, factories and commercial establishments located along riverbanks and within the Manila Bay watershed area, including major and minor waterways will be conducted. Solid Waste Management The implementation of Solid Waste Management Plan (SWM) will be undertaken which includes solid waste management audit (segregation at source and segregated collection by the LGUs of covered provinces), and the closure of open and controlled dumpsites. Moreover, the updated OPMBCS seeks to address and improve the implementation of the Toxic and Hazardous Wastes Management System by validating existing database of Hazardous Wastes Generators (HWGs), mandatory registration of all hazardous waste generators, updating of database on volume and type of wastes generated, improved segregation of healthcare/hospital/ toxic/ hazardous wastes as required under RA 9003. The Plan will devise ways to improve implementation of Hazardous Wastes Tracking System stipulated under RA 6969, with hazardous wastes generated in Manila Bay region tracked as well as ship-generated hazardous wastes. These activities will be jointly undertaken by DENR/EMB, DOH, PPA, and NSWMC, together with other cooperating agencies such as DILG, MARINA, and PCG. Under the revised Plan, DENR/EMB will require all importers/exporters of Toxic and Hazardous Waste (THW) to secure permit/clearance from EMB as stipulated under the Basel Convention on Transboundary Movement of Hazardous Wastes. The Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) crafts programs/projects that would help reduce water pollution and rehabilitate critical habitats in the bay. These are mainly focused on the prevention of pollution from ship-generated waste, prohibition of sea - dumping of industrial sludge, contaminated dredged materials and other contaminants at sea, and the intensification of campaigns against illegal fishing.
19
Water Pollution Management Action Plan

Goal: Protect the waters in Manila Bay and its tributaries (rivers and lakes) and ensure that they are safe for various uses (e.g. recreation, irrigation, transportation, fisheries and other living resources, sources of potable water)
Issue-Based Action Plans A. Pollution Point and Non-Point Sources
Management Targets (MT) By 2015, 50% reduction of pollution loads from point and non-point sources is achieved in the following river systems:
1) Pampanga River 2) NCR Rivers (Paranaque, Las Pinas, Zapote rivers) 3) Navotas - Malabon - Tullahan - Tenejeros River 4) MMO 5) Laguna Lake 6) Pasig River 7)Maragondon (Cavite) 8) Talisay River (Bataan) 9) Angat Watershed and tributaries/major rivers 10) Pasig - Marikina - San Juan (PAMARISAN) River 11) Pasac River (Sasmuan, Masantol, Macabebe Pampanga) 12) Pasig - Potrero River (Pampanga) 13) Porac - Gumain River (Pampanga) 14) Imus River (Cavite)
Installation and maintenance of adequate septic
Management Outcomes (MO) MO 1 50% of pollution load (i.e. BOD and nutrients) from point and non-point sources reduced in the identified river systems. MO 2 Adverse impact of septic and sludge that handled/treated by companies are managed and minimized by putting -up sewerage and treatment facilities.
tanks on target households along the major river systems and other areas directly or indirectly draining sewage to Manila Bay. plants By 2021, the following management targets are achieved: Significant reductions in BOD, nutrients and sediments from point and non-point sources have achieved.
Management of existing wastewater treatment
Establishment/Construction of sewerage uses
(e.g. recreation, irrigation, transportation, fisheries and other living resources, sources of potable water) systems and centralized sewage treatment facilities (CSTF) in priority areas, including subdivisions and housing projects. Bay Region
Management of sewer network in all areas in the Establishment/management of common waste
water treatment facilities in key industrial areas and economic zone
20
Issue-Based Action Plans B. Solid Waste
Management Targets (MT) By 2015, 100% of the LGUs within the Manila Bay region have complied with the following: Establishment / implementation of waste reduction, storage, collection, transport, disposal and treatment system for SW from household, commercial and industrial establishments. Upgrading/operating MRFs (for sorting & recycling) and composting facilities. Construction and operationalization of sanitary landfill for residual wastes
Management Outcomes (MO) MO 3 100% of LGUs with approved and adopted 10-year integrated solid waste management plan; 100% waste collection efficiency at barangay level; 100% segregated collection at barangay level; 100% of barangays or cluster barangays' MRFs are established/upgraded and effectively and efficiently used; 100% of open and controlled dumpsites are closed by December 2012; and 100% compliance with the establishment and operational criteria/ requirement of sanitary landfill MO4 100% of LGUs have systematically, comprehensively, and ecological managed their solid waste. MO 4
LGUs Integrated Solid Waste Management Systems (SWMS) are in place and operational by 2021 in the Manila Bay Region (NCR, Regions 3 and 4A). C. Toxic and Hazardous Waste By 2015, 100% of hospital and healthcare in the Manila Bay region are able to properly collect, transport, recycle and treat hazardous waste and dispose of treated hazardous waste. By 2020, a Comprehensive Toxic and Hazardous Waste (THW) Management System is in place and adopted/implemented in the Manila Bay region.
100% collection, segregation, storage, treatment and transport of hazardous wastes achieved and minimized risks to environment and public health. MO5 Public health and the environment are protected and free from risks posed by the toxic and hazardous wastes. 100% registration of industries generating toxic and hazardous wastes 100% compliance of registered industries to comprehensive toxic and hazardous waste management system
21
Issue-Based Action Plans D. Sea Dumping of Waste, Discharges of Operational Wastes from Ships and Use of Harmful Antifouling Paints
Management Targets (MT) By 2015, garbage and operational discharges from ships and use of harmful antifouling paints are eliminated. By 2020, sea dumping activities (dredged materials, septage sludge, solid waste, toxic and hazardous wastes, etc.) are 100% stopped
Management Outcomes (MO) MO 5 The Manila Bay is released from the by-products of human activity that cause harm to marine environment.
(Please refer to OPMBCS Part II, I - A Water Pollution Action Plan, p50)
2. Degradation and Overexploitation of Habitats and Resources The revised OPMBCS seeks to address the rehabilitation of critical habitats and resources in the Manila Bay area as recommended in the Refined Risk Assessment (RRA) of Manila Bay to include the bays continuing deterioration in the midst of Climate Change. It is also the intention under this revised OPMBCS to bring close to the objective of rehabilitation works to contribute to the reduction of pollution. Rehabilitating and enriching the mangrove cover, for example, along the shorelines will absorb and reduce the influx of pollutants that drain to the Bay. By performing this buffer function, all other services of mangroves are delivered - from providing a good nursery and spawning areas to a number of fish and other marine resources to protecting lives and properties of community from storm surges. This holds true to rehabilitating the upland forests the function of trees in holding the soil will check sedimentation that will ultimately silt up Manila Bay with nutrients, heavy metals, agri-chemicals and other pollutants. Premises considered, habitats, and resources for focus within the the 2011-2015 timeframe are: Mangroves for its important role in fisheries production, pollution reduction, and buffers from storm surges - Massive rehabilitation and enrichment of the present cover of is targeted as a priority for 2011-2015. Fisheries as a protein source for majority of coastal communities A Fish Stock Assessment will be conducted yearly to determine status as well as the needed interventions to increase catch and production. Soils, Rivers, and Ground waters as both medium of pollutants and placed at risk by pollution A monitoring program for these resources shall be established as basis for
22
its protection and management. Relevant studies on area vulnerability to erosion and flooding, sedimentation rates, impacts to soil and groundwater quality of use of pesticides, land subsidence and uplift etc. are among the important studies/researches to be undertaken on the resources mentioned. Rehabilitation of eroded river and streambanks and forestlands through tested biological and engineering means shall be part of the program for 2011-2015. Watersheds, Protected Areas (PAs), and Critical Habitats (CHs) Strengthening the present management of existing PAs (for gene pool and biodiversity purposes) to include institutionalizing financial sustainability in the management of these areas is targeted in the revised OPMBCS. Initiative of LGUs in their establishment of fish sanctuaries or marine parks is supported in this Plan. Strict Protection Zones which have been subjected to exploitation or occupancy by settlers shall be rehabilitated and managed using the micro watershed approach. To be monitored along with the protection of the watersheds will be the implementation of the National Greening Program (NGP) ensuring at 80% survival rate of seedling planted area by cooperators within the 3 Regions. A restoration Plan for important cultural, geological, historical and archaeological resources in Manila is to be explored within the 2013-2015 as one of the new plans for development and implementation in the next scaling up phase for Manila Bay.
23
Habitats and Resources Management Action Plan

Goal : Manage the habitats and resources of Manila Bay Region for sustained benefits and security to all its stakeholders
Issue-Based
Management Targets
Management Outcomes
Deteriorating quality of Manila Bays habitats and resources Resources : Mangroves Surface and ground waters Fisheries Soil Forest Cover Biodiversity
By 2015, critical habitats and resources show promising signs of improvement and recovery and contributing to the reduction of pollution in Manila Bay - Development and implementation of Integrated Rehabilitation Plan (for critical habitats, natural and cultural resources) - Enrichment planting of the existing mangrove cover and open forests - Stock assessment of fisheries - Soil conservation and stream bank stabilization programs
MO 1. Visible and measurable improvements in critical habitats and resources are attained - 80% survival of NGP planting areas within Manila Bay - Marine turtles and migratory birds, as biodiversity indicators, are present - commercially important fish species are appearing from stock assessment MO 2. Water quality of the bay has improved - sedimentation rate is reduced - soil bioengineering infra are established MO 1. Appreciation of cultural, historical and archaeological attributes of Manila Bay is gaining grounds among stakeholders and seen as potential for ecotourism
Habitats : Rivers and other wetlands Forests and Watersheds Mangroves
Desecration and loss of cultural, historical and archaeological assets of Manila Bay
(Please refer to OPMBCS Part II, I - B Habitats and Resources Action Plan, p79)
24
3. Partnership and Governance This will address both the barriers and enabling concerns of the OPMBCS. The table below presents the management targets and outcomes for Partnership and Governance. Partnership and Governance Management Action Plan
Goal: Promote partnership and ensure the implementation of good environmental governance as means to achieve the sustainable development of the Manila Bay Region Issue-Based Action Plans Addressing the Barriers Management Targets (MTs) Various barriers to achieve the management targets towards the realization of the Bays vision are addressed through: Establishment of Institutional arrangements Management Outcomes (MOs) MO 1 Management measures/actions on the following are efficiently and effectively achieved: Appropriate functional management authority guiding, overseeing and coordinating the implementation of the OPMBCS and other related programs and projects. Management of designated critical habitats/ecosystems, port and shipping zones, coastal tourism and other eco-tourism zones, Human Settlements areas, agricultural and institutional zones, industrial zones, waste management zones (i.e. sanitary landfill, wastewater and sewerage treatment facilities, etc.) and forest zones. Improvement of LGUs economy through creation of alternative livelihood and other income generating and being self-reliant communities. Improvement of waterways water quality, enhancement of the bays/ easements aesthetic value and reduction of pollution load achieved. Improvement of coastal communities living conditions through the adoption of the Integrated River Basin and Coastal Area Mgt. System. Minimization of loss of lives and damage to property and assurance that communities affected can be easily recovered and/or go back to normal lives. 25
Development and adoption of Land and Sea Use plan
Implementation of developmental and investment programs by LGUs through PPP Removal/Demolition/Relocation of houses, structures, constructions and other encroachments Development, set up and operationalization of integrated River Basin and Coastal Area Management system for the Manila Bay Region Preparedness plans for bay-wide natural and man-made hazards and climate change adaptation/mitigation measures
Issue-Based Action Plans Enabling Action
Management Targets (MTs) Comprehensive IEC Program

Fifty (50%) of the coastal and inland
Management Outcomes (MOs) MO 2 Increased level of awareness, knowledge, and participation of 50% coastal & inland communities on the bays importance and on the OPMBCS programs/projects implementation and their effects to human and environment. MO 3 Deeper understanding of the stakeholders/partners on their commitments/roles/ responsibilities in the protection, conservation, rehabilitation and development of river systems to preserve their cultural, socio-economic, and ecological value. MO 4 Management actions/ programs identified in the OPMBCS to achieve the bays vision through application of best practices and outputs from studies are adopted/implemented. MO 5 Decisions and relevant support tools (modeling) providing basis for the development and management of investments to achieve the bays vision are developed, validated and applied.
communities are aware and knowledgeable on:
a) the bays cultural, socio-economic, and ecological value; b) the bays worsening pollution problem; c) the reasons behind the worsening pollution problem; d) the effects of pollution to humans and the environment; & e) OPMBCS plan of actions to address the bays worsening pollution and actively participating and supporting the OPMBCS implementation. Evaluation of Management Strategy (knowledge and information, modeling tool, and access and communication) Achievement of the vision for the Manila Bay- is supported by integrated knowledge, information, decision tools, access and communication.
Below are the priority concerns of this component: Addressing the Barriers To address the barriers in the implementation of the OPMBCS, the DENR will implement the partnerships and governance component. A functional management authority for the Manila bay region, harmonization of policies and guidelines, and enhancement of stakeholder agencies capability and awareness on the importance of the bay, among others, will be studied to come-up
26
Issue-Based Action Plans Enabling Action
Management Targets (MTs) Efficient and effective enabling ecosystem/habitat monitoring , comprehensive IEC and management strategy evaluation programs and adoption of set of action plans for the following
Management Outcomes (MOs) System for the Ecosystem/Habitat Monitoring, IEC, and the Monitoring Evaluation Strategy are developed and defined as these are served as basis for putting various management approaches into practical uses in order to consolidate and further strengthen the cleaning up, rehabilitation and preservation of the Manila Bay. MO 1 Management measures /actions that are carried out to improve and protect the health of the bay/ ecosystems are evaluated using the monitoring program that assesses and reports on the bay and its t tributaries ecosystems condition.
Ecosystem/Habitat Monitoring Program A Monitoring Program that comprehensively assesses and repots the ecological condition of the Bay is developed and implemented.
with appropriate recommendations. The development and implementation of the Water Quality Management Areas (WQMA) within the Manila Bay region, together with the adoption of Land and Sea use plan, will be prioritized by all agencies. In addition to Cavite and Bataan as the Integrated Coastal Management (ICM) sites, other provinces/municipalities within the region will be encouraged to embark in the implementation of ICM projects. For landlocked areas, an Integrated River Basin Management System Plan will also be developed and implemented. Simultaneously, rehabilitation of degraded forest and mangrove areas through reforestation of 100,000 ha* (NGP national 2011 target), development and implementation of bay-wide climate change adaptation plan and adoption of natural hazards preparedness plan will be undertaken. Removal of informal settlers along the waterways Removal of informal settlers and illegal structures along the waterways, constructions and encroachments will be the focus of action of the MMDA, DPWH, DILG, and NHA. The Manila Bay Program Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) will be developed for the six provinces of Regions 3 and 4A and Metro Manila. The Manila Bay Task Force at the LGU level will be created. The cleared areas will be converted into parks, playgrounds, bicycle lanes, plant nurseries, and other multiple uses. (Please refer to Part II, I - C Partnership and Governance Action Plan, p89)
27
B. Area-Based/ Major River Basin Action Plan

This part of the Plan introduces the area-based actions for the following major rivers systems that are highly polluted and subject to various management targets. (see Figure 4: Some major rivers discharging into the Manila Bay) a) b) c) d) e) f) g) h) i) j) Pampanga River NCR Rivers (Paranaque, Las Pinas, Zapote rivers) Navotas - Malabon - Tullahan - Tenejeros River Maragondon River (Cavite) Talisay River (Bataan) Angat Watershed and tributaries/major Rivers Pasig - Marikina - San Juan (PAMARISAN) River Pasac River (Sasmuan, Masantol, and Macabebe, Pampanga) Pasig-Potrero River (Pampanga) Porac-Gumain River (Pampanga)
Figure 4: Some major rivers discharging into the Manila Bay
28
k) l) m) n)
Imus Cavite River Marilao - Meycauayan - Obando River Laguna Lake Pasig River
Each of the individual action plans of the afore-mentioned major river systems contributes to the attainment of one or more of the management strategy targets. Each action plan has a respective target to be attained through a series of identified management outcome and/or enabling action outcomes. The management targets and outcomes of an area-based action plan are grouped into water pollution (solid, liquid and informal settlers) (WP), habitat and resources (HR), and partnerships and governance (PG). The implementation of the management targets for both WP and HR will be enhanced by a range of enabling programs of the PG. (i.e. target communication, education and motivation support, decision tool support, information management system). Initially, two (2) area-based action plans are developed for implementation. These are for the Pampanga River Basin and the Marilao - Meycauayan - Obando (MMO) River Basin. The action plans for the rest of the target major river systems are to be developed by concerned stakeholder agencies, together with the LGUs, starting July of 2011. The Action Plans for Pampanga River Basin and Marilao - Meycauayan - Obando River Basin are referred to Part II, II - A & B Pampanga River Basin and Marilao - Meycauayan - Obando River Basin Action Plans, on pp. 106 - 150.
V. Financial Strategy
The implementation of the OPMBCS requires approximately Php 130.43 Billion. For the construction of sewerage systems and septage treatment facilities alone outside of the concession areas, a total budgetary requirement amounting to Php 35 Billion is needed. The required budget for the mandamus agencies for them to implement their programs/ projects will come from the national budget or the General Appropriations Act (GAA). However, in areas of Region 3 and part of Region 4A need both the funds from GAA and loans both from local and foreign financial institutions. The entry of private sector into the business of sewerage and sanitation will be encouraged. The extent of investment, moreover, needs the recommendation and approval of the Regional Development Councils (RDCs) and the National Economic and Development Authority (NEDA), respectively. Public and Private Partnership (PPP) shall be considered as alternative fund sources of OPMBCS implementation.
29
The Manila Bay Coordinating Office (MBCO) shall serve as the facilitator of all fund sourcing activities, together with the Governing Boards of the Water Quality Management Areas and Protected Areas. The funds of WQMAs and PAs must be created and/or activated to be able to sustain their operations.
30
AGENCY
SUMMARY OF BUDGETARY REQUIREMENTS 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Lump-Sum
TOTAL (In Millions) 495.96 42.34 59,722.00 3,839.00 170.00 4.50 33.24 0.10 13,047.00 2.00 35,000.00 112,356.14 425.01 10.00 695.00 11.05 4.80 8.98 1,154.84 633.23 20.00 0.45 20.90 5.80 316.55 180.06 13,705.00 20.22 3.28 146.075 5.50 18.00 21.00 1,820.00 16,916.11 130,427.09
WATER POLLUTION DENR MBCO 58.16 DENR EMB 5.92 MWSS 6,807.00 LWUA LLDA 9.60 DOH 0.50 DA BSWM 1.29 DA BAI 0.10 MMDA PCG 0.25 Others SUBTOTAL 6,882.82 HABITATS AND RESOURCES DENR MBCO 41.60 DENR PAWB 2.00 DENR FMB DA BSWM 2.21 DA FPA DA BFAR SUBTOTAL 45.81 PARTNERSHIP AND GOVERNANCE DENR MBCO DENR NAMRIA DENR NWRB DENR PAWB DENR MGB DENR EMB DENR NSWMC MMDA PCG PNP-MG DA UP NIGS DPWH DepEd Functional Management Authority (if established) SUBTOTAL GRAND TOTAL 97.50 0 0.05 3.10 0 41.25 0 16.686 2.24 0.53 0.025 0 3.90 1.00
147.40 6.76 10,814 30.00 11.10 0.72 6.57
101.40 92.00 97.00 7.72 8.20 7.24 8,035.00 14,916.00 19,150.00 505.00 1,866.00 1,438.00 12.60 14.10 15.60 0.96 1.18 1.14 7.44 11.14 6.80
6.5O
107.00
13,047.00 0.45 11,017 99.94 2.00 173.75 2.21 1.20 1.10 280.20 114.97 5.00 0.10 6.10 1.45 142.25 47.265 1,215.00 4.33 0.63 66.15 5.50 4.00 5.00 0.45 0.40 0.45 35,000.00 48,160.50
8,670.57 16,909.02 20,716.23 95.65 2.00 173.75 2.21 1.20 2.63 277.44 116.33 5.00 0.10 3.10 1.45 43.60 44.865 3,262.00 4.36 0.64 25.955 0 2.70 5.00 92.16 2.00 173.75 2.21 1.20 2.63 273.95 138.68 5.00 0.10 2.50 1.45 44.25 43.365 4,337.00 4.97 0.70 28.89 0 3.40 5.00 95.66 2.00 173.75 2.21 1.20 2.63 277.45 165.75 5.00 0.10 6.10 1.45 45.20 44.565 4,874.00 4.32 0.78 24.76 0 4.00 5.00
0.295
500.00 600.00 720.00 166.28 1,617.83 4,015.19 5,215.39 5,901.12 7,094.91 12,915.03 12,963.20 22,398.36 26,894.80
0.30 48,160.80
Note: Budgetary requirements for general activities for the three components of the OPMBCS. Exclusive of area-based budgetary requirements.
31
VI. Implementing Arrangements

Below is a defined institutional arrangement needed to ensure that the mandamus agencies and local implementers attain the immediate goal of cleaning up and rehabilitating the Manila Bay.
Figure 5: Diagram of the Implementation Arrangement for the OPMBCS
The Manila Bay Advisory Committee In early 2009, the Supreme Court created the Manila Bay Advisory Committee (MBAC) to receive and evaluate the quarterly progressive reports on the activities undertaken by the agencies in accordance with the decision to clean up, rehabilitate, and preserve Manila Bay and to monitor the execution phase. The Manila Bay Coordinating Committee The Manila Bay Coordinating Committee (MBCC) is composed of Metropolitan Manila Development Authority (MMDA), Department of Education (DepEd), Department of Health (DOH), Department of Agriculture (DA), Department of Budget and Management (DBM), Philippine Coast Guard (PCG), Philippine National Police - Maritime Group (PNP-
32
Maritime Group), Department of Interior and Local Government (DILG), Philippine Ports Authority (PPA), Local Water Utilities Administration (LWUA), Metropolitan Waterworks and Sewerage System (MWSS), and the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) as the chair of the Committee. Other non-mandamus members are DOT, DOE, DND, DOST, DTI, DOF, DSWD, NAPC, PRRC, NEDA, President of the League of Municipalities and Cities in Regions III, IV A and NCR. The MBCC was organized in 2006 to coordinate functional national and local bodies created by laws and other sectors to ensure that activities are consistent and complementary to the OPMBCS, provide policy guidance and direction with respect to the implementation of the OPMBC, promote participation and monitor the implementation and progress made, ensure the recommend legislation and institutional mechanisms, and secure budget for the realization of the OPMBCS. The Manila Bay Coordinating Office As lead agency, the DENR created the Manila Bay Coordinating Office (MBCO) through DENR Administrative Order No. 2011-01 issued on 17 January 2011 as prescribed under the Supreme Court En Banc Decision in G.R. Nos.171947-48 s. 2008 to fully implement the Operational Plan for the Manila Coastal Strategy. The MBCO, headed by a Program Director, is tasked to coordinate the implementation of the OPMBCS, as well as the reporting of the accomplished activities of the mandamus agencies to the Supreme Court. Also, the MBCO serves as the secretariat of the MBCC. Site Coordinating Council/Site Management Office In each region, a regional counterpart of the MBCC called the Site Coordinating Council (SCC) was established. It is composed of Local Government Units (LGUs) in the Manila Bay area, mandamus National Government Agencies (NGAs) represented by regional directors, the private sector, and various stakeholder representatives. The SCC is chaired by the Regional Executive Director who acts, in concurrent capacity as Manila Bay Regional Coordinator of the SCC. The SCC has coordinative functions and involved on the overall planning of the local-based/area-based approach of the OPMBCS implementation. Moreover, a Site Management Office (SMO) was established in Regions III, IV A, and NCR to monitor and coordinate the progress of the implemented activities.
33
VII. APPENDICES
List of Acronyms and Abbreviations
34
List of Acronyms and Abbreviations

ADCO AFMA AO BFAR BOI BOO BOT BSWM CBFM CHED CLUPs CMMD CMMO CMT CPUE CREBA CSTF CWTP CWTS DA DAO DENR DepEd DFA DILG DAR DND DOE DOH DOJ DOJ-MOAC DOST DOT DOTC DOT-PTA DPWH DSWD DTI EBM ECC Advocacy and Communication Agriculture and Fisheries Modernization Act Administrative Order Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources Board of Investment Build Operate Own Build Operate Transfer Bureau of Soils and Water Management Community-based Forest Management Commission on Higher Education Comprehensive Land Use Plans Coastal and Marine Management Division Coastal and Marine Management Office Civil Military Training Catch Per Unit Effort Chamber of Real Estate and Builders Association, Inc. Centralized Sewage Treatment Facilities Centralized Wastewater Treatment Plant Civic Welfare Training Service Department of Agriculture DENR Administrative Order Department of Environment and Natural Resources Department of Education Department of Foreign Affairs Department of the Interior and Local Government Department of Agrarian Reform Department of National Defense Department of Energy Department of Health Department of Justice Department of Justice-Maritime and Ocean Affairs Center Department of Science and Technology Department of Tourism Department of Transportation and Communication Department of Tourism-Philippine Tourism Authority Department of Public Works and Highways Department of Social Welfare and Development Department of Trade and Industry Ecosystem -Based Management Environmental Compliance Certificate
35
ECO-CORPS EIS EBM EMB EO ERA ESWM FAOs FARMCs FGDs FMB FPA GAA GEF GOP GSIS HLURB HUDCC IBP ICM IEC IEMP IFDMP IFMA IIMS IMO IPRA IPs IRA IRR JICA KBP LDPs LGUs LLDA LUC LWUA M&E MAO MARINA MARPOL 73/78 MBAC MBCS
Environmental Conservation through Citizens Organized Participation and Support Environmental Impact Statement Ecosystem - Based Management Environmental Management Bureau Executive Order Environmental Risk Assessment Environmental Solid Waste Management Fisheries Administrative Orders Fisheries and Aquatic Resources Management Councils Focus Groups Discussions Forest Management Bureau Fertilizer and Pesticide Authority General Appropriations Act Global Environment Facility Government of the Philippines Government Service Insurance System Housing and Land Use Regulatory Board Housing and Urban Development Coordinating Council Integrated Bar of the Philippines Integrated Coastal Management Information, Education and Communication Integrated Environmental Management Program Integrated Forestry Development and Management Plan Integrated Forest Management Agreement Integrated Information Management System International Maritime Organization Indigenous Peoples Right Act Indigenous People Internal Revenue Allocation Implementing Rules and Regulations Japan International Cooperation Agency Kapisanan ng mga Brodkaster sa Pilipinas Local Development Plans Local Government Units Laguna Lake Development Authority Land Use Committee Local Water Utilities Administration Monitoring and Evaluation Municipal Agriculture Office Maritime Industry Authority Marine Pollution-International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973, as modified by the Protocol of 1978 Manila Bay Advisory Committee Manila Bay Coastal Strategy
36
MBEMP MBIN MBOP MCD MENRO MEY MFARMCs MGB MHOs MM MMDA MOA MOAC MOU MPDO MRF MSY MTPDP MWSS NAMRIA NAPC NCAA NCCA NCIP NCR NDRRMC NEDA NFARMC NFRDI NGAs NGOs NHI NIA NIPAS NMTT NOCOP NPC NSTP NSWMC NWIN NWRB ODA OPMBCS OPRC
Manila Bay Environmental Management Project Manila Bay Information Network Manila Bay Operational Plan Municipal Coastal Database Municipal Environment and Natural Resources Office Maximum Economic Yield Municipal Fisheries and Aquatic Resources Management Councils Mines and Geosciences Bureau Municipal Health Offices Metro Manila Metropolitan Manila Development Authority Memorandum of Agreement Maritime and Ocean Affairs Center Memorandum of Understanding Municipal Planning Development Office Materials Recovery Facility Maximum Sustainable Yield Medium Term of the Philippines Development Plan Manila Waterworks and Sewerage System National Mapping and Resource Information Authority National Anti Poverty Commission National Collegiate Athletic Association National Commission on Culture and the Arts National Commission on Indigenous People National Capital Region National Disaster Risk Reduction Management Council National Economic Development Authority National Fisheries and Aquatic Resources Management Council National Fisheries Research and Development Institute National Government Agencies Non-Government Organizations National Historical Institute National Irrigation Administration National Integrated Protected Areas System Navotas-Malabon-Tullahan-Tenejeros River National Operation Center on Oil Pollution National Power Corporation National Service Training Program National Solid Waste Management Commission National Water Information Network National Water Regulatory Board Official Development Assistance Operational Plan for the Manila Bay Coastal Strategy Oil Pollution Preparedness, Response and Cooperation
37
PAGASA PAMARISAN PAO PAR PAs PATLEPAM PAWB PCAPI MBCC PCCI PCG PCGA PCMARD PCRA PD PDF PEMSEA PENRO PEPP PEZA PHIVOLCS PIA PMES PMO MTPDP PN PNP - Maritime PNRI PPA PPA PPDO PPFP PPPs PRA PRRC RA RDC RDs REDs RPFP RRA SB SC
Philippine Atmospheric, Geophysical and Astronomical Services Administration PasigMarikinaSan Juan River Provincial Agriculture Office Physical Accomplishment Report Protected Areas Philippine Association of Tertiary Level Educational Institution in Environmental Protection and Management Protected Areas and Wildlife Bureau Pollution Control Association of the Philippines, Inc. Manila Bay Coordinating Committee Philippine Chamber of Commerce and Industry Philippine Coast Guard Philippine Coast Guard Auxiliary Philippine Council for Marine and Aquatic Resources Development Participatory Coastal Resource Assessment Presidential Decree Provincial Development Fund Partnerships in Environmental Management for the Seas of East Asia Provincial Environment and Natural Resources Office Philippine Environmental Partnership Program Philippine Economic Zone Authority Philippine Institute of Volcanology and Seismology Philippine Information Agency Performance Monitoring and Evaluation System Project Management Office Medium - Term Philippine Development Program Philippine Navy Philippine National Police Maritime Group Philippine Nuclear Research Institute Philippine Ports Authority Plans/Programs/Activity Provincial Planning and Development Office Provincial Physical Framework Plans Public-Private Partnerships Philippine Reclamation Authority, formerly Public Estates Authority (PEA) Pasig River Rehabilitation Commission Republic Act Regional Development Council Regional Directors Regional Executive Directors Regional Physical Framework Plan Refined Risk Assessment Sangguniang Bayan Supreme Court of the Philippines
38
SDS-SEA SIFMA SME SMOs SP STD SW SWM TBT TDL TESDA THW TLRC TWG UN UNCLOS UNDP UP UP-MSI UP-NHRC UP-NIGS UWM VTS WWTF
Sustainable Development Strategy for the Seas of East Asia Socialized Industrial Forestry Management Agreements Small and Medium Enterprise Site Management Offices Sangguniang Panlalawigan Storage, Treatment and Disposal Solid Waste Solid Waste Management Tributyltin Total Discharge Loading Technical Education and Skills Development Authority Toxic and Hazardous Waste Technology and Livelihood Resource Center Technical Working Group United Nations United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea United Nations Development Program University of the Philippines University of the Philippines-Marine Science Institute University of the Philippines- National Hydrological Research Center University of the Philippines-National Institute of Geological Sciences Unit Work of Measurement Vessel Traffic Separation Wastewater Treatment Facility
39
VII. APPENDICES
Definition of Terms
40
Definition of Terms
Biodiversity The variety of life on Earth at all its levels, from genes to ecosystems, and the ecological and evolutionary processes that sustain it. BOD (Biochemical Oxygen Demand) The Measure of the approximate quantity of dissolved oxygen required by bacteria or microorganisms to stabilize organic matter in wastewater or surface water. Catchment The Catchment area or drainage basin, area drained by a stream or other body of water. The limits of a given catchment area are the heights of land-often called drainage divides, or watersheds - separating it from neighboring drainage systems. Class SA A classification of coastal and marine waters suited for the propagation, survival and harvesting of shellfish for commercial purposes. Class SB A classification of coastal and marine waters suited for bathing, swimming, skin diving etc. by the public and appropriate for spawning of Chanos chanos or Bangus and other similar species. Class SC A classification of coastal and marine waters suited for recreational water such as for boating, etc. and fishery water supply for commercial and sustenance fishing. Cleaner Production The application of an integrated, preventive environmental strategy to processes, products, services to increase efficiency and reduce risks to humans and the environment. Clean-up operations Activities involving the removal of pollutants discharged or spilled into a water body and its surrounding areas, and the restoration of the affected areas to their former physical, chemical and biological state or conditions. Coastal Use Zoning Coastal use zoning provides a plan and regulatory system to allocate the appropriate zones and corresponding uses of an area, based on the functional capability and sustainability of the land and water to the desired uses, the level of development envisioned by the stakeholders, existing policy, and ecological and cultural or traditional considerations. Commercial Wastewater Means all the wastewater generated by trading or business establishment and/or any related firms
41
or companies, which includes but not limited to restaurants, shopping malls, commercial boratories, hospitals, markets, commercial condominiums, hotels, gasoline stations, and establishments.
laother
Continuing Mandamus A writ of mandamus issued to a lower authority by the higher authority in general public interest asking the officer or the authority to perform its task expeditiously for preventing miscarriage of justice. DO (Dissolved Oxygen) The amount of oxygen that is dissolved in water. The higher the DO, the better the condition for the growth and productivity of aquatic resources; while low DO levels may kill fishes and other aquatic life.
Ecosystem All the animals and plants in a particular area, and the way in which they are related to each other and to their environment. Ecosystem Health The condition in which an ecosystem is active and maintains organization and autonomy over time and is resilient to stress (Costanza, 1992) Effluent Means discharges from known source which are passed into a body of water or land, or wastewater flowing out of a manufacturing plant, industrial plant including domestic, commercial and recreational facilities. Effluent Standard Means any legal restriction or limitation on quantities, rates, and/or concentrations or any combination thereof, of physical, chemical or biological parameters of effluent which a person or point source is allowed to discharge into a body of water or land. Groundwater A subsurface water that occurs beneath a water table in soils and rocks, or in geological formations Hazardous Wastes
Substances that are without any safe commercial, industrial, agricultural or economic usage and are shifted, transported or brought from the country of origin for dumping or disposal into or intransient through any part of the territory of the Philippines, By-products, side-products, process residues, spent reaction media, contaminated plant or equipment or other substances from manufacturing operations and as consumer discards of
42
manufactured products which present unreasonable risks and/or injury to health and safety and to the environment. Heavy Metals Potentially toxic metals used in industrial processes such as arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, mercury, nickel, and zinc. They may damage plant and animal life at low concentrations and tend to accumulate in the food chain. Household Domestic Wastewater Means the wastewater discharges generated from household (single-residential structures) dwelling units specifically from toilets, kitchens, washing areas and other similar sanitary conveniences or facilities. Industrial Waste The liquid waste from industrial process, as distinct from domestic or sanitary waste. Industrial Wastewater Means all the wastewaters from any producing, manufacturing, processing, trade or business, or any other operations/activities from industrial establishments. Influent Raw wastewater Inorganic Matter Chemical substances of mineral origin, or more correctly, not of basically carbon structure. Loading Limit Refers to the allowable pollutant loading limit per unit of time which the discharger is permitted to discharge into any receiving body of water or land resources. Information, Education and Communication (IEC) Framework Refers to the guiding mechanism to effectively communicate the Plan to the different stakeholders which requires different approaches focusing on environmental ethics, environmental literacy, and environmental advocacy. Management Action Plan Target details to be achieved within the period of five (5) years Management Outcomes Results that need to be achieved for a particular action target Manila Bay Region Refers to the watershed areas covering the National Capital Region or Metro Manila, Central
43
Luzon (Region III), and the Southern Tagalog Region (Region IV). Nitrate / Nitrite Nitrates and nitrites are families of chemical compounds containing atoms of nitrogen and oxygen. Occurring naturally, nitrates and nitrites are critical; since they are the main sources from which planet obtain the element nitrogen. This element is required for the production of amino acid which, in turn, is used in the manufacture of proteins in both plants and animals. Nitrate is inorganic or organic ester or salt of nitric acid, containing the (NO3-) ion. Nitrates are the best water soluble of all salts and play a major part in nitrogen cycle and nitrate pollution. Inorganic nitrate are formed by bacteria and are essential component of agricultural soil. Organic nitrates are manufactured compound, and because they generate oxygen when heated, they are used in explosives such as nitrocellulose and nitroglycerin. Non-Point Source Means any source of pollution not identifiable as point source to include, but not limited to, runoff from irrigation or rainwater which picks up pollutants from farms and urban areas. Organic Matter Chemical substances of animal or vegetable origin, or more correctly, of basically carbon structure comprising compounds consisting of hydro carbons and their derivatives. Orthophosphate. An acid or salt containing phosphorus as PO4 Parameters Particular physical, chemical, or biological properties that are being measured. pH Range from 0 (highly acidic) to 7 (neutral) to 14 (highly basic). Acidity of water is critical in the maintenance of aquatic life. In both extreme ranges of pH (either basic o acidic), marine life cannot be sustained. Aquatic/ Marine organisms can only tolerate a narrow pH range. Most fishes can tolerate a pH range of 5 to 9; while shellfishes and algae are more sensitive. Seawater is not as vulnerable as freshwater due to the presence of salts, which can serve as buffer for any sudden pH change. Phosphate Phosphorus, especially in inland waters, is often the nutrient that limits growth of aquatic plants. Thus when it is added to a body of water, it may result in increased plant growth that gradually fills in the lake. The discharge of raw or treated wastewater, agricultural drainage, or certain industrial waste that contain phosphates to a surface water body may result in a high eutrophic state, in which the growth of photosynthetic aquatic micro and macro organisms are stimulated to nuisance levels.
44
Plan Refers to the Operational Plan for the Manila Bay Coastal Strategy (OPMBCS). Point source Means any identifiable source of pollution with specific point of discharge into a particular water body. Pollutant Shall refer to any substance, whether solid, liquid, gaseous or radioactive, which directly or indirectly; 1. Alters the quality of any segment of the receiving water body so as to affect or tend to affect adversely any beneficial use thereof. 2. Is hazardous or potentially hazardous to health. 3. Imparts objectionable odor, temperature change or physical, chemical or biological change to any segments of the water body; 4. or Is in excess of the allowable limits or concentrations limitation or restriction prescribed in the Clean Water Act. Pollution means any alteration of the physical, chemical, biological properties of any water, air and/or land resources of the Philippines, or any discharge thereto of any liquid, gaseous or solid waste, or any production of unnecessary noise or any emission of objectionable odor as will or is likely to create or to render such water air and/or land resources harmful, detrimental or injury to public health safety or welfare, or which will adversely affect their utilization for domestic, industrial, agricultural, recreational or other legitimate purposes. Pollution Load This refers to the amount or quantity of a pollutant parameter being discharged by a facility. Refined Risk Assessment Refers to the assessment used to determine the significance of risk posed by various factors emanating from human health and the ecosystem. River Basin The land area that is drained by a river and its tributaries. Sanitation Facilities Refer to onsite facilities such as toilet and septic tanks for safe disposal of human wastes. Septage Means the sludge produced on individual onsite wastewater-disposal systems, principally septic tanks and cesspools.
45
Septic Tank A water type receptacle which receives the discharges of the plumbing system for or part thereof, and is designed to accomplish the sedimentation and digestion of the organic matter in the sewage with in the period of detention/retention. Sewage Means water-borne human or animal wastes, excluding oil or oil wastes, removed from residences, buildings, institutions, industrial and commercial establishments together with such groundwater, surface water and storm water as may be present including such waste from vessels, offshore structures, other receptacles intended to receive or retain wastes, or other places or the combination thereof. Sewerage Includes, but is not limited to, any system or network of pipelines, ditches, channels, or conduits including pumping stations, lift stations and force mains, service connections including other constructions, devices, and appliances appurtenant thereto, which involve the collection, transport, pumping and treatment of sewage to a point of disposal. Significant Parameters These are the specific parameters assigned to different types of industry for monitoring purposes. Sludge Means any solid, semi-solid or liquid waste or residue generated from a wastewater treatment plant, water supply treatment plant, or water control pollution facility, or any other such waste having similar characteristics and effects. Stakeholders Refer to the key players in the implementation of the Plan, which include the government agencies, private sectors (industries), and the public (communities). Surfactant

A major component of synthetic detergent which imparts the clean effect. Surfactants are generally non biodegradable and may cause a number of environmental problems as a result of their persistence, surface active property. Surfactant has large organic molecule which lowers surface tension and cause foaming in water.
Suspended Solids Solids that either float on the surface of or are in suspension in waste, wastewater, or other liquids, and which are largely removable by laboratory filtering. The quantity of material removed from wastewater in a laboratory test, as prescribed in Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater referred to as non-filterable residue.
46
Temperature A measure of whether a substance is hot or cold. Total Coliform Group of bacteria with common characteristics used to indicate unacceptable water quality. Total Dissolved Solids Amount of materials that are dissolved in water which may include carbonate, bicarbonate, chloride, sulfate, phosphate, nitrate, and calcium. These can reduce the clarity of water, contribute to the reduction of aquatic plant photosynthesis, and lead to the increase in water temperature. Total Suspended Solids Amount of undissolved solid particles in water (e. g., silt, decaying plant and animal matter, and domestic and industrial wastes) which is indicative of the extent of sedimentation resulting from land-based activities. The higher the TSS value, the lower is the ability of water to support aquatic life due to reduced light penetration affecting photosynthesis. This may also cause the clogging of gills among fishes which affect respiratory processes and increased absorption of heat that results in higher water temperature. Toxic Toxic wastes are poisonous and have carcinogenic, mutagenic or teratogenic effects on human or other life forms. TSD (Treatment, Storage, Disposal facilities) are the facilities where hazardous wastes are stored, treated, recycled, reprocessed, or disposed of. Waste Means any material either solid, liquid, semisolid, contained gas or other forms resulting from industrial, commercial, mining or agricultural operations, or from community or household activities that is devoid of usage and discarded. Waste Generator Means a person (natural or juridical) who generates or produces hazardous wastes, through any commercial, industrial or trade activities. Waste Transporter Means a person (natural or juridical) who is licensed to transport hazardous waste. Waste Treater Means a person (natural or juridical) who is licensed to treat, store, recycle, or dispose of hazardous wastes
47
Wastewater Means wastes in liquid state containing pollutants. Wastewater Survey An investigation of the quantity and characteristics of each stream, has in an industrial plant or municipality. Water Body Any significant accumulation of water, usually covering the Earth or another planet. The term body of water most often refers to large accumulations of water, such as oceans, seas, and lakes, but it may also include smaller pools of water such as ponds, puddles or wetlands. Rivers, streams, canals, and other geographical pictures where water moves from one place to another are not always considered bodies of water. Water Pollution Means any alteration of the physical, chemical or biological or radiological properties of a water body resulting in the impairment of its purity or quality. Water Quality Means the characteristics of water which define each use in terms of physical, chemical, biological, bacteriological or radiological characteristics by which the acceptability of water is evaluated. Water Sample A sample taken from one of the following sources: drinking, surface, ground, storm runoff, industrial or domestic wastewater Water Usage and Classification
The quality of Philippine waters shall be maintained in a safe and satisfactory condition
according to their best usage. In general this refers to current best beneficial use that is expected to last, at least, for at least next 10 to 20 years. In special cases when dictated by political, economic, social, public health, environmental and other considerations, certain waters may be classified according to the intended or future beneficial use. Waterways A navigable body of water, such as a river, channel, or canal. Wetlands A low-lying area of land that is saturated with moisture, especially when regarded as the natural habitat of wildlife. Marshes, swamps, and bogs are examples of wetlands.
48
VIII. REFERENCES
49
REFERENCES: Department of Agriculture- Bureau of Animal Industry (DA-BAI) Action Plan 2011-2015 Department of Agriculture- Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (DA-BFAR) Action Plan 2011-2015 Department of Agriculture- Bureau of Soils and Water Management (DA-BSWM) Action Plan 2011-2015 Department of Agriculture- Fertilizer and Pesticide Authority (FPA) Action Plan 2011-2015 Department of Education (DepEd) Action Plan 2011-2015 DENR-Department Administrative Order (DAO) 2007-28. 31 July 2007 DENR-Department Administrative Order (DAO) 2011-01. 17 January 2011 Department of Environment and Natural Resources Manila Bay Coordinating Office -Site Management Office III (DENR-MBCO-SMO III) Action Plan 2011-2015 Department of Environment and Natural Resources Manila Bay Coordinating Office -Site Management Office IV A (DENR-MBCO-SMO IV A) Action Plan 2011-2015 Department of Environment and Natural Resources Manila Bay Coordinating Office -Site Management Office NCR (DENR-MBCO-SMO NCR) Action Plan 2011-2015 Department of Environment and Natural Resources Environmental Management Bureau (DENR-EMB) Action Plan 2011-2015 Department of Environmental and Natural Resources Protected Areas and Wildlife Bureau (DENR - PAWB) Action Plan 2011 2015 Department of Interior and Local Government (DILG) Action Plan 2011-2015 Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) Action Plan 2011-2015 Inter-Agency Meetings. Commenced on March 2011 Laguna Lake Development Authority (LLDA) Action Plan 2011 -2015 Local Water Utilities Administration (LWUA) Action Plan 2011-2015 Manila Bay Consultation Meeting. April 2011 Metro Manila Development Authority (MMDA) Action Plan 2011-2015 Metropolitan Waterworks and Sewerage System (MWSS) Action Plan 2011-2015 PEMSEA. Operational Plan for the Manila Bay Coastal Strategy. 2005. Quezon City, Philippines PEMSEA and MBEMP-MBIN. 2007. Manila Bay Area Environmental Atlas. Quezon City, Philippines RA 9003 s. 2004. The Ecological Solid Waste Management Act of 2004 RA 6969 s. 1990. The Toxic Substances and Nuclear Wastes Control Act of 1990
50
RA 9275 s. 2004. The Philippine Clean Water Act of 2004 RA 7160 s. 1991. The Local Government Code of the Philippines Philippine National Police Maritime Group (PNP-MG) Action Plan 2011 2015 Supreme Court Decision. GR Nos. 171947-048. 15 February 2011 The World Bank Group. 2003. The Philippine Environment Monitor on Water Quality White, P., Lopez N., and Peralta L. 2007.Ecosystem-Based Management Approach. PHILMINAQ Writeshop for the Updating of the Operational Plan for the Manila Bay Coastal Strategy, 17 -19 May 2011. The Sierra Madre Resorts and Hotel, Tanay, Rizal Workshop for the Updating of the Operational Plan for the Manila Bay Coastal Strategy, 7-8 June 2011. Lewis Grand Hotel, Clarkfield, Angeles City, Pampanga
51
Manila Bay Coordinating Office (MBCO) Team, headed by Executive Director Noel Antonio V. Gaerlan, whose valuable technical contribution is vital in the preparation and completion of the 2011 2015 OPMBCS Engr. Ramon B. Aguilar, Jr. - Deputy Program Director Aracelli C. Oredina - Chief, Planning/ Monitoring/ IEC Division Engr. Diosdado C. Doctor - Chief, Technical Support Division Leila M. Peralta - Technical Consultant Nilda S. Baling - Executive Assistant IV Floradema G. Colorado - Administrative Assistant III Chita Hidalgo - Science Research Specialist I Jean C. Boromeo - Supervising Environmental Management Specialist Leah C. Orcilla - Technical Staff Alvin D. Gatbonton - IEC Specialist II Mary Angelie B. Sto Domingo - Monitoring Officer Rex. M. Mayo - Monitoring Officer Margarito G. Calipara - System Network Administrator Noel P. Peaflor - Monitoring Officer Arvin P. Nualda - Technical Assistant Ariel A. Bonita - Computer Peripheral Equipment Operator Emy V. Enaje - Application / Data Specialist Jean C. Pascual - Application / Data Specialist
53
PART II
Contents
I. Issue-Based Action Plan A. B. C. Water Pollution Habitat and Resources Management Partnership and Governance
II. Area-Based Action Plan A. B. Pampanga River System Marilao-Meycauayan-Obando River System
56
WATER POLLUTION MANAGEMENT ACTION PLAN 2011-2015 Goal: Protect the waters in Manila Bay and its tributaries (rivers and lakes) and ensure that they are safe for various uses (e.g. recreation, irrigation, transportation, fisheries and other living resources, sources of potable water)
Unit of Work Project/ Program Activity Measure Baseline 2011
Target Budge t
Target/Estimated Budget 2012

Target Budge t
2013
Target Budge t
2014
Target Budge t Target
2015
Budget
Budgetary Requirement (Million)
Budget Source
Respon sible Agency/ Person
LIQUID WASTES Reduction of pollution load (i.e. BOD) from point and non-point sources A. Domestic Wastes Metropolitan Waterworks and Sewerage System (MWSS) Service Area Construct and % of water-served maintain population and area sewerage covered by sewerage systems and and sanitation centralized treatment facilities sewage treatment facilities (CSTF) in priority areas, including subdivisions and housing projects
Lead Agency: MWSS and Concessi onaires, LGUs Cooperat ing Agency: DENR, EMB, LLDA, DOH
57
WATER POLLUTION MANAGEMENT ACTION PLAN 2011-2015

Target Budge t

Target Budge t
2013
Target Budge t
2014
2015
Budget
Budget Source
Maynilad Water Services Inc. (MWSI) Sewerage % Water -Served 8% 12% Popn Covered Manila, Manila, Area Covered1
Caloocan, Navotas, Malabon, Muntinlupa, Makati, Quezon City Caloocan, Navotas, Malabon, Muntinlupa, Makati, Quezon City
13%
Manila, Caloocan, Navotas, Malabon, Muntinlupa, Makati, Quezon City
18%
Manila, Caloocan, Navotas, Malabon, Muntinlupa, Makati, Quezon City, Valenzuela
25%
Manila, Caloocan, Navotas, Malabon, Muntinlupa, Makati, Quezon City, Valenzuela, Pasay
31%
Manila, Caloocan, Navotas, Malabon, Muntinlupa, Makati, Quezon City, Valenzuela, Pasay, Paraaque, Las Pias
Region 4a - Cavite Sewer Served Population Water Served Population NCR Sewer Served Population Water Served Population
275,741
273,051
740,412
813,348
882,498
954,267
1,012,120
552,746
950,055
1,062,195
1,445,358
2,094,555
2,403,032
7,021,001
6,899,268
7,064,642
7,234,819
7,427,728
7,595,496
Area Covered in terms of location. Once implemented, actual land area will be supplied by MWSS.
58

Target Budge t

Target Budge t
2013
Target Budge t
2014
2015
Budget
Budget Source
Sanitation % Water Served Population Covered Area Covered
44%
49%
12%
23%
33%
43%
Region 4a (Cavite) Served Population Water Served Population NCR Sewer Served Population Water Served Population2 Area Covered
149,751
373,564
38,424
76,848
115,272
153,696
273,051
740,412
813,348
882,498
954,267
1,012,120
2,845,405
3,132,634
830,564
1,661,128
2,491,692
3,322,255
6,468,255
6,346,522
6,511,896
6,682,073
6,874,981
7,042,750
Manila, Caloocan, Navotas,
Figure is in terms of Net of Sewer Served Population
59

Target Budge t

Target Budge t
2013
Target Budge t
2014
2015
Budget
Budget Source
Malabon, Muntinlupa, Makati, Quezon City, Valenzuela, Pasay, Paraaque, Las Pias, Bacoor, Imus, Cavite City, Kawit,Rosario, Noveleta
Malabon, Muntinlupa, Makati, Quezon City, Valenzuela, Pasay, Paraaque, Las Pias, Bacoor, Imus, Cavite City, Kawit,Rosari o, Noveleta
Manila Water Company, Inc. (MWCI) Sewerage % Water-Served 10% 14% Population Covered Makati, Makati, Area Covered
Mandaluyong, Manila, Marikina, Pasig, Quezon City, Taguig Mandaluyon g, Manila, Marikina,Pas ig, Quezon City, Taguig
14%
Makati, Mandaluyon g, Manila, Marikina,Pas ig, Quezon City, Taguig
14%
15%
38%
NCR Sewer Served Population Water Served Population
574,912
4,235,582
815,117
4,877,667
817,333
4,935,453
869,578
5,011,324
948,141
5,096,110
2,205,952
5,163,821
60

Target Budge t

Target Budge t
2013
Target Budge t
2014
2015
Budget
Budget Source
Rizal Area Covered Sewer Served Population Water Served Population Sanitation % Water-Served Population Covered Area Covered
Cainta
Cainta
Cainta
Cainta
Cainta
Cainta, Antipolo, Taytay 258,647

1,295,155
18,003
1,678,817
17,422
1,167,760
18,039
1,199,606
18,044
1,237,638
18,049
1,272,667
87%
Makati, Mandaluyong, Manila, Marikina, Pasig,Pateros, Quezon City, San Juan, Taguig
96%
Makati, Mandaluyon g, Manila, Marikina, Paraaque, Pasig,Patero s, Quezon City, San Juan, Taguig
24%
Makati, Mandaluyon g, Manila, Marikina, Pasig,Quezo n City, San Juan, Taguig
51%
Makati, Mandaluyon g, Manila, Marikina, Pasig,Patero s, Quezon City, San Juan, Taguig
71%
95%
NCR Served Population Water Served Population
Desludging is done once every 5 to 7 years

3,477,547 3,819,252 1,069,133 1,870,987 2,667,050 3,625,609
3,660,670
4,302,756
4,120,336
4,196,207
4,280,993
4,348,704
61

Target Budge t

Target Budge t
2013
Target Budge t
2014
2015
Budget
Budget Source
Rizal Served Population Water Served Population Area Covered
1,147,625
1,432,706
214,745
889,720
1,276,678
1,717,812
1,660,814
Angono, Antipolo, Baras, Binangonan, Cainta, JalaJala, Rodriguez, San Mateo, Taytay, Tanay, Teresa
1,149,757
1,182,184
1,220,217
1,255,245
1,277,734
% of estimated total septage desludged that are treated in accordance with current regulations and standards MWSI Region 4a (Cavite) NCR MWCI NCR Region 4A (Rizal) Amount Invested for Sewerage and Sanitation MWSI MWCI
100% 100%
100% 100%
100% 100%
100% 100%
100% 100%
100% 100%
100% 100%
100% 100%
100% 100%
100% 100%
100% 100%
100% 100%
684 1,688
1,907 4,900
3,614 7,200
2,835 5,2002
5,316 9,6002
8,850 10,3002
22,522 37,200
62

Target Budge t

Target Budge t
2013
Target Budge t
2014
2015
Budget
Budget Source
Amount collected for sewerage and sanitation services MWSI MWCI Comply with the effluent standards for existing STPs % of total domestic pollution loading that is treated in accordance with current regulation and standards i.e. BOD MWSI Region 4a (Cavite) BOD Removed, Kg BOD/day BOD Loading, kg BOD/day NCR BOD Removed, kg BOD/day BOD Loading, kg BOD/day
1,669 1,295 1%
2,317 1,600 7%
3,627 1,900 8%
3,866 2,000 12%
4,151 2,100 17%
4,421 2,200 22% Loan/ Equity Lead Agency: MWSS and Concessi onaires Cooperat ing Agency: DENR, EMB, LLDA, DOH, Land develope rs, CREBA, LGUs
4211
2,514
9,969
11,915
15,177
18,913
21,843
921
7,481
9,431
16,258
28,679
36,702
64,632
92,891
103,490
124,423
147,216
163,923
63

Target Budge t

Target Budge t
2013
Target Budge t
2014
2015
Budget
Budget Source
MWCI NCR BOD Removed, kg BOD/day BOD Loading, kg BOD/day Sewered Billed Volume (MLD) Billed Volume (MLD) Rizal BOD Removed, kg BOD/day BOD Loading, kg BOD/day Sewered Billed Volume (MLD) Billed Volume (MLD)
14,700 144,480 98 903
19,650 157,120 131 982
19,800 159,360 132 996
21,300 163,200 142 1,020
23,550 168,640 157 1,054
55,050 171,840 367 1,074
269
337
366
302
409
5,721
33,440 2 209
30,136 2 188
32,448 2 203
35,873 3 224
38,477 3 240
38,198 38 239
64

Target Budge t

Target Budge t
2013
Target Budge t
2014
2015
Budget
Budget Source
Local Water Utilities Administration (LWUA) Update/verify % residential, baseline data on commercial, the number of institutional and residential, industrial commercial, establishments institutional and connected and industrial served by waste establishments water treatment connected and facilities served by waste water treatment facilities3 Construct and maintain sewerage systems and centralized sewage treatment facilities (CSTF) in priority areas, including subdivisions and housing projects % of water-served population and area covered by sewerage and sanitation treatment facilities 35,0004
Lead Agency: LWUA, WDs, LGUs Cooperat ing Agency: DENR, EMB Lead Agency: LWUA, WDs Cooperat ing Agency: LGUs, NEDA, RDCs, DPWH
3 4
Note: data needed in the formulation of action plan to be submitted on 30 September 2011 to the Supreme Court Amount to be utilized for infrastructure construction in regions 3 and 4.The value is approximated based on 100% water-served population.
65

Target Budge t

Target Budge t
2013
Target Budge t
2014
2015
Budget
Budget Source
Sewerage % Water-served Population
3,436,281 water served population

5
0%
0%
0%
2%
2.6%
Lead Agency: LWUA, WDs, LGUs Cooperat ing Agency: DENR, EMB, DPWH, DOH, DILG Lead Agency: LWUA and Water Districts
Sanitation % water-served population6 Amount Invested in sewerage and sanitation7 Comply with the effluent standards for existing STPs % of total domestic pollution loading that is treated in accordance with current regulation and standards i.e. BOD BOD Removed, kg BOD/day BOD Loading, kg BOD/day
25%
25% 30
25% 505
25% 1,866
25% 1,438 3,839
19,629
22,692
24,926
103,088
121,910
128,296
130862
133,479
146,622
Cooperat ing Agency: DENR, EMB, LLDA, DOH, Land develope rs, CREBA,
5 6 7
58% total population Equivalent Households = 502,663 Yearly budget. Not in cumulative basis.
66

Target Budge t

Target Budge t
2013
Target Budge t
2014
2015
Budget
Budget Source
Respon sible Agency/ Person LGUs
Laguna Lake Development Authority (LLDA) Construct and Natural wastewater maintain (constructed sewerage wetlands) treatment systems and facility centralized -established data on sewage point source pollution treatment facilities (CSTF) in priority areas, including subdivisions and housing projects
100 and >BOD loading from 40,000 households 100 and >BOD loading from 1,000 households 80-100 BOD loading from1,500 HH Standard DAO 35 (To be implement ed in 2012) Standard DAO 35 (To be implement ed in 2013) Standard DAO 35 (To be implement ed in 2013)
95
LISCOP
Lead Agency: LLDA Cooperat ing Agency: LGUAngono, LGUCalamba / Calamba Water District
(85)8
(5)
(5)
Figures in the parenthesis are details of the total Php 95M budget of LLDA.
67

Target Budge t

Target Budge t
2013
Target Budge t
2014
2015
Budget
Budget Source
Department of Health Enforce and % of septic and monitor sludge handling/ compliance to treatment companies effluent that are inspected standards and certified as being compliant with current regulations and standards
To be determined
64
0.4
100
0.6
120
0.8
140
160
1.2
GAA
Lead Agency: DOH and DOH Center for Health Develop ments for Central Luzon, CALABA RZON and NCR Lead Agency: DOH and DOH Center for Health Develop ments for Central Luzon, CALABA RZON and NCR
% of septic and sludge handling/ treatment companies that have valid Environmental Sanitary Clearances issued by DOH
To be determined
16
0.1
50
0.12
60
0.16
70
0.18
80
0.2
0.76
GAA
68

Target Budge t

Target Budge t
2013
Target Budge t
2014
2015
Budget
Budget Source
Department of Environment and Natural Resources Construct sanitary facilities (with septic tanks) in wharfs or public fish landing sites along Manila Bay shoreline (1 per region) Sanitary facilities constructed and operational 3 0.9 0.9 MBCO Funds DENRRegional Offices
Sub-total (Liquid-Domestic Waste)

B. Industrial/ Commercial Wastes Laguna Lake Development Authority (LLDA) Update/verify Updated report on baseline data on established baseline point and nondata point sources of pollution Total number of establishments surveyed (with or without permits/clearances) within the Manila Bay Region Total number of new industries covered by EUFS (from 3900 to 4400) Enforce and monitor compliance to effluent # of industries inspected/ monitored % compliance of 587 500
98,661.4
12
LLDA Funds
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
100
100
100
100
100
2000 5%
9.6
2500 10%
11.1
3000 15%
12.6
3500 20%
14.1
4000 25%
15.6
63
LLDA Funds
69

Target Budge t

Target Budge t
2013
Target Budge t
2014
2015
Budget
Budget Source
standards
non-complying industries % total pollution reduction by industries
industries 4320 MT BOD 1% (4277) 2% (4234) 3% (4190) 4% (4148) 5% (4104)
Environmental Management Bureau Update/ verify Updated report from baseline data/ established baseline information on data pollution loading from industrial and commercial sources Total number of industries identified - # of industries inspected and monitored Enforce and monitor compliance to effluent standards % total pollution load treated by industries
0.5
EMB Funds
Cooperat ing Agency: DTI, LGUs
9600 960 0.96 1,920 1.92 1,920 1.92 2,400 2.4 2,400 2.4
9.6
EMB Funds
38,250MT/ yr
10%
0.96
20%
3.84
25%
4.8
25%
4.8
20%
3.84
18.24
EMB Funds
Cooperat ing Agency: LLDA, PRRC
% of establishments inspected complying to the DAO 35 effluent standards % of industries issued with NOV and referred to PAB
5%
10%
15%
15%
15%
2%
4%
8%
8%
8%
70

Target Budge t

Target Budge t
2013
Target Budge t
2014
2015
Budget
Budgetary Requirement (Million) 0.9
Budget Source
Construct wastewater treatment plant by industries 9 Resolve Water pollution cases in the Manila Bay Region by PAB
# of wastewater treatment plant constructed and operational % of water pollution cases within the Manila Bay Region resolved
0.9
MBCO Funds
50%
0.21
0.21
MBCO Funds
Coordina ting Agency: EMB, PAB
Sub-total (Liquid-Industrial/Commercial Wastes)

C. Agricultural Department of Agriculture - Bureau of Soils and Water Management (BSWM) Reduce % Reduction in total 0.5 1.29 estimated total pollution loading from pollution loading CROPLAND based from on allowable CROPLAND threshold level sources in the Manila Bay River Basin Region10
104.45
6.57
7.44
20
11.1 4
50
6.80
33.24
DBM
Lead Agency: BSWM, BAS, FPA, ATI, NIA, PhilRice, SRA, DA-RFU 3, DARFU 4
10
Thru enforcement action of EMB and PAB Activities in the cropland is indicated in the area-based action plan
71

Target Budge t

Target Budge t
2013
Target Budge t
2014
2015
Budget
Budget Source
Department of Agriculture - Bureau of Animal Industry (BAI) Determine Database on the volume of following established: pollution load from livestock - livestock farms operation and - rendering plants compliance to - slaughter houses existing - meat processing environmental plants management - poultry dressing regulations11 plants Report on baseline data Department of Environment and Natural Resources Determine total Report on: discharges loading for the Domestic waste Manila Bay Region Industrial wastes Agricultural Run off
0.1
0.1
DBM
Lead Agency: BAI
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
4 4 4
MBCO funds
Lead Agency: DENR, EMB, MWSS and Concessi onaires, LWUA and WDs, LLDA, BSWM
Sub-total (Liquid-Agricultural Wastes) Sub-Total (Liquid Waste)

11
45.34 98,811.19
Other activities of BAI on the implementation is reflected in the Partnership and Governance Action Plan
72

Target Budge t

Target Budge t
2013
Target Budge t
2014
2015
Budget
Budget Source
SOLID WASTE Implementation of Solid Waste Management (SWM) Plan Department of Environment and Natural Resources Clean up and rehabilitation of major river systems Cleaning materials/ equipments provided # of river systems cleaned and rehabilitated Report on volume of litter/garbage dredged per river Restore esteros Esteros restored/ rehabilitated (stream bank stabilized, slope protected, bioremediation technology applied) Report on the volume and disposal of collected floating garbage # of trash boats provided, deployed and maintained 1 11 30 74 MBCO Funds Cooperat ing Agency: LLDA, PCG, DILG, MWSS and Concessi onaires, LGUs Cooperat ing Agency: PRRC, LLDA Lead Agency: DENR Cooperat ing Agency: MMDA, DPWH
12
16
7.2
10%
35
20%
40
35%
45
50%
50
177.2
MBCO Funds
Collect and dispose floating garbage
82.8
MBCO funds
9.2
11
59.4
14.4
73

Target Budge t

Target Budge t
2013
Target Budge t
2014
2015
Budget
Budget Source
Respon sible Agency/ Person Lead Agency: DENR, EMB Cooperat ing Agency: NSWMC
Upgrade MRFs
MRFs upgraded
0.45
MBCO funds
Establish SWM Champion Model Site
Developed criteria for champion model site # of awarded sites 5 6
MBCO funds
Lead Agency: DENR Cooperat ing Agency: LGUs, NSWMC, MMDA, DILG
Department of Interior and Local Government 12 Conduct Solid Waste Management Audit in the following LGUs # of LGUs with and without approved solid waste management plan # of LGUs implementing segregation at source Lead Agency: DILG, LGUs Cooperat ing Agency: NSWMC
12
The specific targets of DILG will be reflected on their 5-year action plan due for submission to the Supreme Court on December 31, 2011.
74

Target Budge t

Target Budge t
2013
Target Budge t
2014
2015
Budget
Budget Source
# of LGUs implementing segregated collection # of LGUs with functional MRFs # of LGUs disposing wastes in Sanitary Landfills Prepare 10 year Solid Waste Management Plan (SWMP) for NSWMC approval # of LGUs with approved SWMP 613 0.9 0.9 MBCO Funds Lead Agency: DILG, LGUs Cooperat ing Agency: NSWMC % of LGUs implementing regular clean up15 50% 65% 80% 100% LGU Funds Lead Agency: LGUs, DILG Cooperat ing Agency: DENR, DPWH, DepEd, NHA,
Mandatory clean up for LGUs14 Region 3: 5 Provinces 12 Cities 84 Municipalities Region 4A: 3 Provinces
Assistance from DENR. 3 sites from SMOs will be selected and assisted for 2011. Actual target and budget will be determined by DILG in their 5 year work plan due for submission on December 31, 2011. 15 DILG to issue MC for LGUs to conduct regular clean up, initially, monthly subject for consultation
13 14
75

Target Budge t

Target Budge t
2013
Target Budge t
2014
2015
Budget
Budget Source
Respon sible Agency/ Person MMDA, PCG, PNP-MG
9 Cities 58 Municipalities NCR: 16 Cities 1 Municipality Metro Manila Development Authority Prepare a 10 # of LGU in Metro year Integrated Manila compliance SWM Plan for with the provisions of LGUs RA 9003: # of 10-year SWM Plan a. Approved b. Completed c. Not yet completed % of barangays with SWM Committee
0.45 16
MBCO Funds
Lead Agency: LGU, MMDA Cooperat ing Agency: NSWMC
17
1 8 8 88.05% (1509)
12 4 89.14% (1520)
13 4 92.66% (1580)
16 1 95.01% (1620)
17 0 0 100% (1705)
1705 Barangays
Cooperat ing Agency: NSWMC Lead Agency: LGU Cooperat ing Agency: MMDA, NSWMC
% of barangays practicing separate collection
1705 Barangays
62.40% (1064)
65.6% (1120)
78.50% (1340)
83.20% (1420)
100% (1705)
16
Assistance from MBCO for 3 LGUs in Metro Manila
76

Target Budge t

Target Budge t
2013
Target Budge t
2014
2015
Budget
Budget Source
Respon sible Agency/ Person Lead Agency: LGU Cooperat ing Agency: MMDA, NSWMC
% of barangays established MRF
1705 MRF/ Barangays
24% or 406 MRF
36.4% or 620 MRF
63.30% or 1,080 MRF
70.40% of 1,200 MRF
100% or 1,705 MRF
Implement and monitor the 10year SWM Plan
% estimated total volume gen. Solid waste in Metro Manila determined a. Composted b. Recycled c. Residual* d. Disposal e. Diversion Rate Storage capacity of new sanitary landfill
14,625,000
3% 27% 11% 70% 30%
5% 30% 10% 65% 40%
7% 33% 8% 60% 44% Start of construct ion
9% 36% 6% 55% 48% Start of operatio n
10% 40% 5% 50% 50% 2,800 GAA

(Develop ment cost and operating cost)
Lead Agency: MMDA, LGUs LGU LGU MMDA MMDA LGU Lead Agency: MMDA
Construct Sanitary Landfill for South of Metro Manila Determine the capacity of sanitary landfills and volume of solid waste collected from different
cu.m
% Available storage capacity of sanitary landfills serving MM that are established in accordance with current regulations and standards
Available storage capacity of existing disposal site plus for
100% space available
85%
75%
50%
40%
10,10018
Lead Agency: MMDA
77

Target Budge t

Target Budge t
2013
Target Budge t
2014
2015
Budget
Budget Source
locations
expansion
17
% volume of solid waste hauled from different pumping station Enforce and monitor compliance to RA 9003 % of apprehended violators of RA 9003, RA 9275 and other existing laws on pollution who are prosecuted and penalized
996 cu.m/year
856 cu.m or 14% decreas e 79,000 apprehe nsions
750 cu.m or 25% decreas e 71280 apprehe nsion or 10% decreas e
489 cu.m or 50% decreas e 36352 apprehe nsion of 25% decreas e
3,274 cu.m = Php 561, 229.08 = equivalent tipping fee Php 147. M or community service
10 apprehens ions/ day* 30 environme ntal enforcers
Closure of Open and Controlled Dumpsites Prepare Assessment Report Assessment and Rehabilitation Plan for open and controlled dumpsites
119
Sub-total (Solid Wastes)
13,522.2
Cost of tipping fee Available Storage is 59, 454, 974.1 (6 years) 19 Force closure of open and controlled dumpsites. Budget requirement is reflected in the Partnership and Governance Action Plan.
18 17
78

Target Budge t

Target Budge t
2013
Target Budge t
2014
2015
Budget
Budget Source
TOXIC & HAZARDOUS WASTES Improve the implementation of the Toxic and Hazardous Waste Management System Validate existing data of Hazardous Waste Generators (HWGs) within the Bay Region Report on existing HWGs data validated per - DTI list of industries which are potential HWGs by nature of business - DOH list of hospitals and clinics - LGU list of industries/businesses potential HWGs by nature of business Update and maintain database and information system in all Manila Bay Regions Database management and information system updated 4 4 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 8 EMB funds Lead Agency: EMBDENR Cooperat ing Agency: DTI, DOH, LGUs 1 1 1 MBCO funds Lead Agency: DENR, EMB Cooperat ing DTI, DOH, LGU
79

Target Budge t

Target Budge t
2013
Target Budge t
2014
2015
Budget
Budget Source
Respon sible Agency/ Person Lead Agency: EMB, DENR Cooperat ing Agency: DTI, DOH
Mandatory register all unregistered hazardous waste generators within Manila Bay region and update database on volume and type of wastes generated Strengthen monitoring of healthcare waste treatment facilities Improve implementation of Hazardous Waste Tracking System stipulated under RA 6969
All of HWGs within Manila Bay region registered 20
14000
2000
5000
8000
11,000
14,000
EMB Funds
# of healthcare waste treatment facilities monitored21
1500
150
300
375
375
300
4.5
EMB Funds
Lead Agency: DENR, DOH Lead Agency: DENR, EMB, PPA Cooperat ing Agency: PEZA, LGUs, PPA, PCG, MARINA
100 % of hazardous wastes generated in Manila Bay region tracked22 100% of shipsgenerated hazardous wastes tracked Report on volume of generated/ collected/ treated wastes
Assuming at 50%
70%
2.25
80%
90%
95%
100%
5.25
MBCO Funds
Assuming at 20%
40%
60%
80%
90%
100%
Budget requirement every year to be determined by EMB Budget requirement every year to be determined by EMB 22 Budget requirement every year to be determined by EMB. MBCO to finance 2011.
20 21
80

Target Budge t

Target Budge t
2013
Target Budge t
2014
2015
Budget
Budgetary Requirement (Million) 2
Budget Source
Respon sible Agency/ Person Lead Agency: EMBDENR Cooperat ing Agency: DTI, PNRI, LGUs, PEZA
Require all importers/export ers of THW to secure permit/clearanc e from EMB as stipulated under the Basel Convention on Transboundary Movement of Hazardous Wastes
THW importers/exporters complying to Basel Convention stipulations23
54
EMB Funds
Sub-total (Toxic and Hazardous Wastes)

SHIP DUMPED WASTES Improve/ manage of ships-generated wastes Establish Database database on established and volume of maintained wastes generated by ships - bilge water - solid waste/garbage - liquid waste/sewage - THW/oily wastes24
17.75
Lead Agency: PPA Cooperat ing Agency: PCG, DENR
23 24
As received. (Issued by EMB-CO) Activities identified by MBCO in absence of PPA Action Plan.
81

Target Budge t

Target Budge t
2013
Target Budge t
2014
2015
Budget
Budget Source
Respon sible Agency/ Person Lead Agency: PPA Cooperat ing Agency: PCG, DENR
Assessment of ports & terminals in Manila Bay region vis--vis adequacy of Shore Reception Facilities (SRF) per MARPOL25 convention requirements26 Upgrading of SRFs to comply with MARPOL convention requirements
100% of SRFs in ports & terminals in the Manila Bay region assessed
PPA
100% of SRFs in ports & terminals in the Manila Bay region upgraded to MARPOL convention requirements 27
Lead Agency: PPA Cooperat ing Agency: PCG, DENR Lead Agency: PPA
Monitor treatment and disposal of ships-generated wastes28 - solid waste/garbage - liquid waste/sewage
# of liquid wastes treatment facilities monitored29 # of garbage disposal facilities monitored
Marine Pollution 73/78 Activities identified by MBCO in absence of PPA Action Plan. 27 Activities identified by MBCO in absence of PPA Action Plan. 28 Activities identified by MBCO in absence of PPA Action Plan. 29 Activities identified by MBCO in absence of PPA Action Plan.
25 26
82

Target Budge t

Target Budge t
2013
Target Budge t
2014
2015
Budget
Budget Source
Respon sible Agency/ Person Lead Agency: PPA Cooperat ing Agency: DENR, Maritime Stakehol ders
Implement Hazardous Wastes Tracking System specified under RA 6969 for ships-generated THW30/oily wastes Create a database for ships/vessels navigating within the Manila Bay area Install for 400 GT and above ships, selfpropelled barges/tankers and vessels towing dumb barges to install oil/water separator
Information on retained copy of Hazardous Wastes Manifest Form verification31
% Completion of database
50%
0.15
100%
0.10
0.25
PCG DBM
Lead Agency: PCG
% compliance of 400 GT and above ships, self-propelled barges/tankers and vessels
50%
60%
0.1
70%
0.12
80%
0.14
90%
0.16
100%
0.18
0.7
PCG DBM
Lead Agency: PCG
30 31
Toxic and Hazardous Wastes Activities identified by MBCO in absence of PPA Action Plan.
83

Target Budge t

Target Budge t
2013
Target Budge t
2014
2015
Budget
Budget Source
Respon sible Agency/ Person Coordina ting Agency: MARINA, PPA Lead Agency: PCG Lead Agency: PCG
Develop and adopt ships garbage management plan for 15 GT and above ships Tank cleaning along Manila bay Area Require SOPEP32 and IOPPC33 for 150 GT and above for Tanker ships and 400 GT and above for other ships such as passenger, cargo ships etc Construct/ Install SRFs
% compliance of 15 GT and above ships Garbage record book accomplished aboard ship % compliance of ships % compliance of 150 GT and above for Tanker ships and 400 GT and above for other ships such as passenger, cargo ships etc
50%
60%
0.05
70%
0.06
80%
0.07
90%
0.08
100%
0.09
PCG DBM
50%
65%
0.05
70%
0.06
80%
0.07
85%
0.08
100%
0.09
0.35
PCG DBM PCG DBM
50%
60%
0.05
70%
0.06
80%
0.07
9%
0.08
100%
0.09
0.35
SRF constructed in 100% of ports in the Manila Bay region
Lead Agency: PPA Coordina ting Agency: PCG
Sub-total (Sea Dumped Wastes)
TOTAL (Water Pollution)
112,052.79
32 33
Shipboard Oil Pollution Emergency Plan International Oil Pollution Prevention Certificate
84
85
HABITATS AND RESOURCES MANAGEMENT Goal : To manage and protect habitats and resources for sustained benefits and security of all stakeholders
Activity a. Development of framework and formulation of the Integrated Rehabilitation Plan for Manila Bay Unit of Work Measure No. of formulated framework Baseline 2011 I. Development and Implementation of Integrated Rehabilitation Plan (for critical habitats, natural and cultural resources : Biodiversity (selected indicator species marine turtles and migratory birds) Mangroves fisheries forest and soil groundwater rivers and other wetlands 0.75 1 0.75 2012 Targets/Budget 2013 2014 2015 Budgetary Requirement (Million) 1.5 M Budget Source Responsible Agency/Person Lead - FMB Inter-agency Habitats TWG
Program/Project
DENR-MBCO
b. Enrichment/ planting of existing mangrove cover, open forests under the NGP and in watersheds
Length of shoreline planted with mangrove Area of mangroves enriched/ replanted: NCR (enrichment) Region 3 (refo & enrichment) Region 4 (refo & enrichment)
434 ha (2005) 59 225 150 59 1.18 60 6.00 10 1.00 59 1.18 45 4.50 35 3.50 59 1.18 40 4.0 35 3.50 59 1.18 40 4.0 35 3.50 59 1.18 40 4.0 35 3.50 5.9 22.5 15.0
DENR-MBCO
DENR-SMOs (3) PAWB LGUs and partners
No. of priority watersheds and 25% of total area: Region 3 No. of Watershed Total Area(Has) 25% of Total Area Cost per Hectare 5 32,569.97 8,142.49 0.003
DENR-FMB, PAWB, MGB and SMOs and local partners (c/o FMB) 2,035.62 2,035.62 2,035.62 6.11 6.10 6.11 2,035.62 6.11 24.43
86
HABITATS AND RESOURCES MANAGEMENT

Program/Project Activity Unit of Work Measure Region 4a No. of Watershed Total Area(Has) 25% of Total Area Cost per Hectare No. of SWIP rehabilitated in 4 Provinces c. Management of protected areas & establishment of additional conservation areas and/ or critical habitats (c/o PAWB) -- restoration of denuded areas within PAs Baseline 2011 14 134,109 33,527.25 0.02 4 Provinces 2012 Targets/Budget 2013 2014 2015 Budgetary Requirement (Million) Budget Source Responsible Agency/Person
8,381.81 8,381.81 8,381.81 167.64 167.64 167.64 4 2.208 4 2.208 4 2.208 4 2.208 8,381.81 167.64 4 2.208 670.56 DA-BSWM 11.040 DENR-MBCO DA BSWM and other DA bureaus and local partners DENR-SMOs, PAWB/PAWCZMS, FMB LGUs concerned
No. of PAs/Area (ha) rehabilitated /restored Region 3 Region 4 NGP Planting Area restored (ha) Region 3 Region 4 5/2803.36 3/915 0 115 2.00 703.36 35.00 200 8.00 700 35.00 200 8.00 700 35.00 200 8.00 700 35.00 200 8.00 140.0
34.00
575 561 (15.715) (15.715)
561 561 (15.715) (15.715)
561 (15.715) 2099 (68.173)
(78.575) (295.225)
NGP funds
655 2112 2112 2112 (21.273) (68.593) (68.593) (68.593) 30 20
DENR-SMOs, FMB LGUs concerned
--protection and law enforcement
LLDA area
87

Program/Project Activity Unit of Work Measure Baseline 2011 No. of violations/cases filed and litigated CH managed/ maintained; CH management plan implemented no. of wetlands managed and monitored Nesting sites managed and monitored d) Bioengineering rehab of rivers and streambanks Length (kms) of streambank: 4 2012 Targets/Budget 2013 2014 2015 Budgetary Requirement (Million) Budget Source DENR 100% litigated (2012) 00 1 20.0 100% 1.16 1 20.0 100% 1.16 1 20.0 100% 1.16 1 20.0 100% 1.16 1 20.0 4.64 DENR-MBCO DENR-SMOs, PAWCZMS (3) Responsible Agency/Person DENR-SMOs, PAWCZMS (3)
100.00
4 1.0
4 1.0
4 1.0
4 1.0
DENR-MBCO 4.0
DENR-SMOs, PAWCZMS (3)
X 0.50
X 0.50
X 0.50
X 0.50
X 0.50
DENR-MBC0 2.50
DENR-SMOs, PAWCZMS (3)
DENR-MBC0
DENR-SMOs NAMRIA Cooperating agencies : DPWH LGUs LGUs concerned HLURB DENR NAMRIA DENR MBCO-lead (Inter-Agency)
Region 4a Region 3 2. Implementation of Comprehensive Integrated Environmental a. Database Enhancement b. Report Card System c. Inter-Agency Offshore Monitoring No. of conducted monitoring
360 635.20
50 0.90 -
79 1.42 158.8 2.86
77 1.39 158.5 2.85
77 1.38 158.8 2.86
77 1.39 159.1 2.86
6.48
11.43 DENR-MBC0 (Budgetary requirement under P&G) DENR-MBC0
(Pls. refer to Partnerships and Governance) 4 per year 4 4 4 4 4
88

Program/Project Monitoring and Reporting System Activity d. Fish Stock Assessment e. Pesticide and Fertilizer Use f. Groundwater Quality and Supply Unit of Work Measure No. of Fish Stock Assessment Annual Monitoring Reports Annual Report Baseline 2011 4 for 4 yrs. 4 4 2012 1 (under P&G) 1 1.20 1 5.0 Targets/Budget 2013 1 2.63 1 1.20 1 5.0 2014 1 2.63 1 1.20 1 5.0 2015 1 2.63 1 1.20 1 5.0 Budgetary Requirement (Million) 7.88 4.80 Budget Source DA-BFAR DA-FPA DENR-MBCO 20.0 Responsible Agency/Person DA-BFAR DA-FPA DENR-NWRB (lead) Cooperating Agencies : DA-BSWM LWUA MGB NAMRIA DENR-MGB NDRRMC
g. Monitoring of Land Subsidence and Uplift 3. Development and full activation of natural and Geohazard mapping and assessment of critical areas for land slides and flooding Coastal Geohazard mapping and assessment
Annual Report
1 5.0 X -
1 5.0 X
1 5.0 X
1 5.0 X
1 5.0 X
25.0
DENR-MBCO
No. of critical municipalities mapped and assessed No. of coastal municipalities mapped
DENR-MBCO
(Pls. refer to Partnerships and Governance) X X X X X DENR-MBCO DENR-MGB
4. Climate Change Adaptation and Sea-level rise
(Pls. refer to Partnerships and Governance) Sea-level rise Monitoring Yearly Tidal datum 5 years 12 mos. 0.77 12 mos. 0.78 12 mos. 0.77 12 mos. 0.78 12 mos 0.77 3.87 DENR-MBCO NAMRIA
89

Program/Project 5. Water Quality Improvement (surface and groundwater) Activity a. Assessment and data collection of surface and groundwater quality Unit of Work Measure Groundwater No. of Provinces Surface/Rivers No. of major rivers NCR Region 3 Region 4A b. Monitoring of pollution loading from aquaculture fisheries (pls. refer to Pollution Reduction Component) Baseline 2011 9 1 2 2012 2 Targets/Budget 2013 2 2014 2 2015 Budgetary Requirement (Million) (Pls. refer to Partnerships and Governance) Budget Source DENR-MBCO Responsible Agency/Person DENR-NWRB
DENR-EMB
DENR-EMB
DA-BFAR (No Action Plan provided by BFAR as of submission)
DA-BFAR DENR-EMB
6. Policy / Legislation Development*
Adaptive/Practical Researches in aid of policy/ legislation on: a) Bathymetry Area (km2) 2000 500 500 500 500 (Budgetary requirement under P & G) (Budgetary requirement under P and G) DENR-MBCO NAMRIA
(Pls. refer to Partnerships and Governance) b) Sedimentation rate No. of Study 1 1 (Pls. refer to Partnerships and Governance)
DENR-MBCO
UP-NIGS
90

Program/Project Activity c) Ecosystems recovery forecasting (fr. Rehabilitation of upland forest and mangroves) Unit of Work Measure Baseline 2011 No. of Study 1 2012 Targets/Budget 2013 2014 1 (Pls. refer to Partnerships and Governance) 2015 Budgetary Requirement (Million) Budget Source DENR-MBCO Responsible Agency/Person ERDB Academe
d) Seasonal fishing harvest closures e) Studies on proper valuation of ecosystems services Formulation of Policy Guidelines on: Reclamation along Mla. Bay Disposal of dredge materials Reversion of abandoned, undeveloped and underutilized fishponds to mangroves Rational Licensing and Permitting System (i.e. fishing boat size and catch, etc.)
No. of Policy issuance No. of study conducted
1 1
1 0.10 1 5.5
DA-BFAR 0.10
DA-BFAR
5.50
No. of Policy No. of Policy No. of Guidelines
1 1 1
1 1.0 1 1.0 1 0.50
1.0 1.0 0.50 (for facilitation/ consultation expenses)
DENR-MBCO DENR-MBCO DENR-MBCO
DENR-EMB DENR-EMB & PCG PAWB-CMMO
No. of Guidelines
1 1.0
1.0
DA-BFAR
DA-BFAR
91

Program/Project Activity Ecological Guidelines for Mangrove Rehabilitation Unit of Work Measure Baseline 2011 No. of Guidelines 1 1 1.0 2012 Targets/Budget 2013 2014 2015 Budgetary Requirement (Million) Budget Source Responsible Agency/Person
DENR-MBCO 1.0
PAWB-CMMO
Formulation of law on : Protection and Mgt. of Rivers Management authority for Manila Bay Soil Conservation 7. Institutional Strengthening/ Arrangements and Sustainability Mechanisms* Operationalization of PAMBs, WQMA-GBs, RBOs, etc. a. Development of PA/WQMA-GB/RBO Management Plan b. Support to PAMB Operations Special/Committee Meetings(other than regular meetings which will be supported by PAWB Funds) Trainings and Capacity-Building Management Plan developed/impleme nted special/ committee mtgs conducted X X 2.0 X 2.0 X 2.0 X 2.0 X 2.0 10.0 Law/R.A. Law/R.A. 1 1 1 3.0 3.0 (Budgetary requirement under Partnerships and Governance) DENR-MBCO DENR-MBCO DENR-RBCO Congress and Senate DENR-Policy, Legal Congress and Senate DA-BSWM Congress and Senate PAWB/PAWCZMS EMB-Regions (3) Concerned LGUs/ SMOs
Law/R.A.
DA-BSWM
4 .8
4 .8
4 .8
4 .8
3.2
DENR-MBCO
DENR-PAWB, EMB Regl. Offices, RBCO
PAMB capacitated;
DENR-MBCO
92

Program/Project Activity a. PAMBs b. Training Ecoguides c. Marine Turtle Conservation Orientation/ Capacity Building Sustainable Financing Mechanism Ecotourism in Protected Areas and Critical Habitats User-fee system # of ecotourism business plans prepared 2 1 5.5 1 5.5 DENR-MBCO PAWB-PAWCZMS Unit of Work Measure 2 Trainings conducted # of eco-guides trained orientation conducted 10/PA 1/Nesting Site 40 40 Baseline 2011 2012 Targets/Budget 2013 2014 2015 Budgetary Requirement (Million) (Budgetary requirement under Partnerships and Governance) Budget Source Responsible Agency/Person PAWB-PAWCZMS
DENR-MBCO PAWB-PAWCZMS-
DENR-MBCO PAWB-PAWCZMS
11.0
Establishment of a User- fee system for ecotourism 8. Promotions and Advocacy for Manila Bay Implementation of the Manila Bay Communication and Advocacy Plan for all audiences at the coastal and landlocked communities
1 2.0
DENR-MBCO 2.0
PAWB-PAWCZMS
(please refer to Partnerships and Governance)
93

Program/Project Activity Unit of Work Measure Baseline 2011 TOTAL BUDGETARY REQUIREMENT 2012 Targets/Budget 2013 277.43 2014 273.938 2015 277.44 Budgetary Requirement (Million) 1,154.83 Budget Source Responsible Agency/Person
45.81 280.2
94
95
Partnership and Governance Enabling Action Plan 2011-2015

Goal: Promote partnerships and ensure the implementation of good environmental governance as means to achieve the sustainable development of the Manila Bay Region Program/Project Activity Unit of Work Measure Baseline 2011 Target (PhP) 20 Targets/Estimated Budget (In Million) 2012 2013 2014 Target (PhP) Target (PhP) Target (PhP) 2015 Target (PhP) Budgetary Requirement (In Million) Budget Source Responsible Agency/ Institution
ADDRESSING THE BARRIERS 1. Revision of the OPMBCS Revise/ Update of the OPMBCS Develop area-based action plan for the OPMBCS OPMBCS submitted to SC 20 DBM Lead Agency: DENR-MBCO Cooperating Agencies: MMDA, DepEd, DOH, DA BAI, DA BSWM, DA- BFAR, DPWH, DBM, PCG, PNP-PMG DILG, PPA, MWSS 0.6 Report on the review of ENR related laws/ policies 1 Report on the review of ENR related laws/ policies 0.5 Report on the review of ENR related laws/ policies 0.3 M Report on the review of ENR related laws/ policies 0.1 1.9 Lead Agency: DENR-MBCO Cooperating Agencies: MMDA, DepEd, DOH, DA-BAI DA-BFAR, DA-BSWM, DPWH, DBM PCG, PNP-PMG DILG, PPA, MWSS, LLDA
12 Action plan developed
2. Harmonization of Conflicting Policies and Guidelines
Review and harmonize policies/ guidelines/ plan
Policy/guidelines reviewed on: Reclamation areas within the bay Clean Water Act Ecological Solid Waste Management Act Soil Conservation Bill drafted Land Use Plan NIPAS LLDA Plan
96

Goal: Promote partnerships and ensure the implementation of good environmental governance as means to achieve the sustainable development of the Manila Bay Region Program/Project Activity Unit of Work Measure Oil Spill Contingency Plan Building Code Resettlement Action Plan Investment Priority Plan Economic reforms Other Environmental Laws Propose and Adopt Policies/ Guidelines/ regulatory measures TWGs created RA/EO/AO proposed and approved Guidelines on Soil Quality established Ordinances/ Resolutions passed Environmental Policies/ Guidelines/ Ordinances implemented 0.005 0.005 DA-BAI Lead Agency: DENR-MBCO 0.02 0.33 0.15 0.30 0 0.8 DBM DA Congress LGUs Baseline 2011 Target (PhP) Targets/Estimated Budget (In Million) 2012 2013 2014 Target (PhP) Target (PhP) Target (PhP) 2015 Target (PhP) Budgetary Requirement (In Million) Budget Source Responsible Agency/ Institution
97

Goal: Promote partnerships and ensure the implementation of good environmental governance as means to achieve the sustainable development of the Manila Bay Region Program/Project Activity Unit of Work Measure RA 9003 Implementation Phase II Implementation of Pollution Loading Reduction Efforts # of patrols/ operations conducted to enforce laws % of apprehended violators who are prosecuted and penalized Report/study on the establishment of the Manila Bay Region Office Recommend proposal on the study (institutional arrangement, legal supports, and 50/yr 80 /yr 50% 100% 0.12 0.22 100% 100% 0.16 0.25 100% 100% 0.24 0.27 100% 100% 0.30 0.30 100% 100% 0.40 0.34 Baseline 2011 Target (PhP) 1.35 Targets/Estimated Budget (In Million) 2012 2013 2014 Target (PhP) Target (PhP) Target (PhP) 2015 Target (PhP) Budgetary Requirement (In Million) 1.35 0.295 Budget Source DBM Responsible Agency/ Institution DENR-MBCO DA-BAI
1.22 1.38
DBM DBM
PCG PNP-MG
30%/yr 50%/yr
30% 50%
0.32 0.21 14. 68
30% 50%
0.37 0.27 33.08 1.5
30% 50%
0.42 0.25 33.08
30% 50%
0.47 0.27 33.08
30% 50%
0.52 0.30 33.08
2.1 1.3 147 1.5
DBM DBM DBM
PCG PNP-MG MMDA Lead Agency: DENR-MBCO Cooperating Agencies: MMDA, DepEd DOH, DA-BFAR DA-BSWM DA-BAI, DPWH DBM, PCG, PNP-MG DILG, PPA, MWSS
3.Establishment of appropriate functional management authority for Manila Bay Region
Conduct of study on putting-up an Office for the Manila Bay Region
98

Goal: Promote partnerships and ensure the implementation of good environmental governance as means to achieve the sustainable development of the Manila Bay Region Program/Project Activity Unit of Work Measure funding) EO/AO/RA approved/ passed for the Manila Bay Region Office Functional Management Authority established Organization and staffing pattern River systems mapped/ delineated WQMA Plan developed Governing boards created 11 Rivers 5.1 1.95 R3 R4A NCR 3 3.6 4.32 5.19 18.06 DBM Lead Agency: DENR-MBCO Cooperating Agencies: DILG LLDA PRRC LGUs 5.4 5.55 5.4 5.55 27 DENR-EMB Baseline 2011 Target (PhP) Targets/Estimated Budget (In Million) 2012 2013 2014 Target (PhP) Target (PhP) Target (PhP) 2015 Target (PhP) Budgetary Requirement (In Million) Budget Source Responsible Agency/ Institution
Adopt and implement the approved functional mgmt. authority
500
600
720
1,820
Functional Management Authority to be established.
4. Declaration of some areas in the Manila Bay region under Water Quality Management Area(WQMA)
Delineate and operationali ze WQMAs
Rivers: NMTT Parana que San Juan
99

Goal: Promote partnerships and ensure the implementation of good environmental governance as means to achieve the sustainable development of the Manila Bay Region Program/Project Activity Unit of Work Measure Land and sea use zoning scheme for each province proposed General guidelines/ plans for the implementation of local land-use drafted LGUs land use plan implemented 6. Updating of delineated water boundaries of coastal municipalities and cities Update on delineated water boundaries of coastal municipaliti es and cities # of LGUs with delineated water boundaries of coastal municipalities and cities determined # of LGUs with certification on delineated water boundaries # of LGUs with passed 3.9 R3 R4A NCR . 3 LGUs 4.68 5.62 6.32 7.58 28.1 DBM Lead Agency: DENR-MBCO Cooperating Agencies: LLDA, MMDA, DA-BFAR, LGUs Baseline 2011 Target (PhP) 4.84 R3 R4A NCR Targets/Estimated Budget (In Million) 2012 2013 2014 Target (PhP) Target (PhP) Target (PhP) 3 4.32 3.6 1 1 1 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.44 1.44 1.44 2015 Target (PhP) 5.19 1.73 1.73 1.73 Budgetary Requirement (In Million) 20.95 Budget Source DBM Responsible Agency/ Institution Lead Agencies: DENR HLURB LGUs Cooperating Agencies: LLDA, MMDA, DA-BFAR DA-BSWM DPWH, DBM, PCG, PNP-PMG DILG, PPA, MWSS, PRRC
5. Development and Adoption of Land and Sea Use Zoning Scheme
Develop and adopt Land and Sea Use Zoning Scheme
100

Goal: Promote partnerships and ensure the implementation of good environmental governance as means to achieve the sustainable development of the Manila Bay Region Program/Project Activity Unit of Work Measure resolutions/ ordinances on delineated water boundaries # of LGUs implementing the resolutions/ ordinances 7. Development and implementation of the Integrated River Basin and Coastal Area Management System Develop, implement and promote ICM # of Integrated River Basin and Coastal Area Management Plan developed and implemented 13.14 R3 Pampa nga Bulacan 8.94 2.04 1.08 1.08 1 1 1.2 1.2 1.44 1.44 1.73 1.73 3 1 3.6 1.2 4.32 1.44 5.19 1.73 29.25 DBM Lead Agency: DENR-MBCO Cooperating Agencies: LGUs, LLDA, PRRC, DILG NWRB, NIA, Private Sector, Civil Society Organizations (CSOs), People Organizations (POs), Funding Institutions Baseline 2011 Target (PhP) Targets/Estimated Budget (In Million) 2012 2013 2014 Target (PhP) Target (PhP) Target (PhP) 2015 Target (PhP) Budgetary Requirement (In Million) Budget Source Responsible Agency/ Institution
R4A NCR .
101

Goal: Promote partnerships and ensure the implementation of good environmental governance as means to achieve the sustainable development of the Manila Bay Region Program/Project Activity Unit of Work Measure Assist on the following: Investment programs/proj ects identified by LGUs Guidelines/ Manual for PPP developed/ disseminated Proposals submitted to funding institutions and NEDA facilitated MOAs/MOUs signed Joint-Venture agreements established Environmental Activities conducted 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 1.8 Baseline 2011 Target (PhP) R3 R4A NCR Targets/Estimated Budget (In Million) 2012 2013 2014 Target (PhP) Target (PhP) Target (PhP) 1 1 1 25% of LGUS 25% of LGUs 25% of LGUs 2015 Target (PhP) 1 25% of LGUs Budgetary Requirement (In Million) 4 Budget Source Responsible Agency/ Institution Lead Agency: DENR-MBCO Cooperating Agencies: LGUs, DILG DTI-BOI, DOF NEDA, DBM LLDA, PRRC Private Sector, CSOs, POs, Financing institutions
8.Development and implementation of investment programs, projects and activities for environment within the Manila Bay Region through PPP
Develop and implement environmen tal investment programs, projects and activities
Negotiate/ Enter agreements with other government agencies, private sector and CSOs
Lead Agency: LGUs Private Sector CSOs POs PCG
102

Goal: Promote partnerships and ensure the implementation of good environmental governance as means to achieve the sustainable development of the Manila Bay Region Program/Project Activity Unit of Work Measure Compliance Reports on Partnership Commitments prepared 9.Removal/ Demolition of all illegal structures and encroachments along coastal shorelines and other waterways Create Manila Bay Task Force/ Groups at the LGU level in Regions 3 and 4A with the following members: Governor as Chair Mayor of affected mun./City as Vice Chair Brgy. Captain affected DPWH NHA PCUP CHR Task Force/Group created by the LGU concerned: Region 3 - Bataan - Pampanga - Bulacan - Tarlac - Nueva Ecija Region 4A - Rizal - Cavite - Laguna Lead Agency: DILG/ LGU R3 R4A NCR Cooperating Agencies: DPWH, MMDA NHA, PCUP CHR, Private Sector, CSOs POs Baseline 2011 Target (PhP) Targets/Estimated Budget (In Million) 2012 2013 2014 Target (PhP) Target (PhP) Target (PhP) 2015 Target (PhP) Budgetary Requirement (In Million) Budget Source Responsible Agency/ Institution
103

Goal: Promote partnerships and ensure the implementation of good environmental governance as means to achieve the sustainable development of the Manila Bay Region Program/Project Activity Unit of Work Measure Baseline 2011 Target (PhP) Targets/Estimated Budget (In Million) 2012 2013 2014 Target (PhP) Target (PhP) Target (PhP) 2015 Target (PhP) Budgetary Requirement (In Million) Budget Source Responsible Agency/ Institution
NGOs/ Private Sector rep. Conduct consultation and coordination with stakeholders
34
# of consultation and coordination activities conducted # of IEC activities conducted
DBM R3 R4A 90 60 30 20 30 20
Lead Agencies: MMDA NCR DPWH R3 and R4A Coordinating Agencies: DILG, LGUs NHA, PCUP, CHR
Actual Field Survey/ Tagging
Number of structures tagged/ mapped
80%
2.4
20%
0.6
DBM
Lead Agencies: MMDA NCR DPWH R3 and R4A Coordinating Agencies: DILG, LGUs, NHA, PCUP, CHR
34
The budget is included in the IEC part
104

Goal: Promote partnerships and ensure the implementation of good environmental governance as means to achieve the sustainable development of the Manila Bay Region Program/Project Activity Unit of Work Measure Validated IS Final Listing of IS Baseline 2011 Target (PhP) 50% 1.5 Targets/Estimated Budget (In Million) 2012 2013 2014 Target (PhP) Target (PhP) Target (PhP) 40% 1.2 10% 0.3 2015 Target (PhP) Budgetary Requirement (In Million) 3 Budget Source Responsible Agency/ Institution Lead Agencies: MMDA NCR DPWH R3 and R4A Coordinating Agencies: DILG, LGUs, NHA Select Beneficiaries Beneficiaries selected/ for qualified Relocation/ Resettlement Lead Agency: NHA/LGUs Cooperating Agencies: DILG, DPWH, MMDA 1.08 1.08 DENRMBCO Lead Agencies: NHA/LGUs Cooperating Agencies: DPWH, MMDA
Validation of Identified/ Tagged IS
Formulate and Implement Resettlement Action Plan (RAP)
RAP developed/ implemented Local RAP developed/ implemented Resettlement Projects developed # of housing units constructed
105

# of families relocated/ resettled Removal and Demolition

35
# of illegal structures demolished36
1038
DBM
Lead Agencies: DPWH MMDA Cooperating Agencies: DILG, PNP-MG LGUs , HUDCC/NHA PCUP, Private Sector, CSOs POs
a. Comml/ Industrial b.Domestic NCR R3 R4A # of families relocated 62,59037 families 5,000 families 1,075 15,000 families 3,225 20,000 families 4,300 22,500 families 4,837 13,437 39
# of areas, rivers and waterways cleared Turn over of cleared areas to LGUs Cleared areas turned over to LGU for maintenance and
35DWPH 36
and MMDA will only commence the removal/demolition after RAP formulation. Baseline data will be established to determine # of illegal structures to be demolished. Responsible agencies are MMDA and DPWH. 37 As of February 2011. Informal Settlers in Metro Manila only. Submitted by MMDA on 17 May 2011 38 Budget allocated by DPWH for the demolition of structures 39 As of January 2011.Based on the computation of NHA for the RAP, PhP 215,000 is allocated per family. This covers the pre-relocation and post-relocation activities for the families to be resettled/ relocated.
106

Goal: Promote partnerships and ensure the implementation of good environmental governance as means to achieve the sustainable development of the Manila Bay Region Program/Project Activity Unit of Work Measure development Mgmt. of cleared areas to prevent reentry/ intrusions of informal settlers/ structures # of sustainable projects/activities implemented in cleared areas through partnership with the private sector and CSOs # of local ordinances enacted and enforced Monitoring mechanisms enforced 10.Development and implementation of Natural Hazards Contingency, Preparedness and Quick Response System for the Manila Bay
40
Baseline 2011 Target (PhP)
Targets/Estimated Budget (In Million) 2012 2013 2014 Target (PhP) Target (PhP) Target (PhP)
2015 Target (PhP)
Budgetary Requirement (In Million)
Budget Source
Responsible Agency/ Institution
Lead Agency: LGUs Cooperating Agencies: MMDA, DPWH Private Sector CSOs, POs, Academe
Develop natural hazards map and identify risks and hazards prone areas 40
LGUs Natural Hazards and Contingency Plan reviewed Vulnerable areas needing support identified
1.2 R3 R4A NCR
1.2
1.2
1.2
4.8
Lead Agencies: DENR MGB NDRMMC Cooperating Agencies: LGUs, LLDA MMDA
Per MMDA, natural hazards map for Metro Manila is already available.
107

Region
Rehabilitate erosion and landslide prone areas
Bio-engineering Rehabilitation of Erosion/ Landslide prone areas
7.5 Rivers: Marikina Angat Pampan ga 2.5 2.5 2.5
10.8
12.96
40.26
Lead Agency: DENR/SMOs
Flood control projects Update and implement the Oil Spill Contingency Plan for the Manila Bay Oil Spill Contingency Plan updated # of Oil Spill response exercises 1.5
103
103
Cooperating Agencies: MMDA, DPWH DILG, LGU, LLDA Lead Agency: PCG Cooperating Agencies: PNP-MG, PPA LGUs, DENRMBCO
2.55
3.1
2.8
12.95
108

Goal: Promote partnerships and ensure the implementation of good environmental governance as means to achieve the sustainable development of the Manila Bay Region Program/Project Activity Unit of Work Measure Climate change adaptation measures implemented per areabased/major river basin Sea Level Rise Measures adapted Disaster Preparedness Quick Response System Sub Total Enabling Action Plans 11. Management Strategy and Ecosystem and Health Monitoring Evaluate Management Management Evaluation Strategy Strategy Framework developed/ Implemented 2 2.4 2.88 3.46 10.74 DBM DENR-MBCO Rescue Orientation conducted 1,000
participants
2015 Target (PhP)
Budget Source
Develop/ implement Climate Change and Sea Level Rise adaptation measures
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
Responsible Agency/ Institution Lead Agencies: Climate Change Com. DENR-MGB Other NGAs
4.5
1.5
1.5
7.5
DA
1,000
participants
1,000
participants
1,000
participants
MMDA
74.79
1,277.04
3,830.03
5,004.95
5,668.54
15,855.64
109

Goal: Promote partnerships and ensure the implementation of good environmental governance as means to achieve the sustainable development of the Manila Bay Region Program/Project Activity Unit of Work Measure OPMBCS Implementation Monitoring Strategy adopted41 - Monitoring/ Supervision of Operations Monitoring and Information System developed/ adopted Develop Ecosystem and Health Monitoring Program Comprehen EMB sive Water Laboratory Quality Upgrading Monitoring Plan Procurement developed/ of facilities Implemented and
41
Baseline 2011 Target (PhP) 20.48
Targets/Estimated Budget (In Million) 2012 2013 2014 Target (PhP) Target (PhP) Target (PhP) 37.55 45.06 54.07
2015 Target (PhP) 64.88
Budgetary Requirement (In Million) 222.04
Budget Source DBM
Responsible Agency/ Institution DENR-MBCO
3.45 0.25 6.6 0.68 0.15 2.5 2 5 2 0.1 2.5 0.2
3.45 0.25 5 6 2 2.5
3.45 0.25 6 7.2 2 2.5
3.45 0.25 7.2 8.64 2 2.5
13.8 1 24.8 27.52 8 0.25 12.5 0.2 2
DBM
DA EMB NSWMC DENR-MBCO NSWMC PCG PAWB DA-BAI, NMIS
DBM
DBM
DENR-MBCO
R3 R4A NCR
EMB/ region (0.5 M)
1.5
1.5
EMB
99.5
99.5
EMB
Includes budget for MBCO and SMOs operation.
110

Goal: Promote partnerships and ensure the implementation of good environmental governance as means to achieve the sustainable development of the Manila Bay Region Program/Project Activity Unit of Work Measure equipment (vessels) Sampling Stations monitored Laguna de Bay Tributary Rivers PRUMS R3 (9 rivers) R4A (4 rivers) NCR (6 rivers) # of additional rivers monitored (outlet only) # of bathing beaches and coastal water stations monitored # of offshore stations monitored 32 11 6 30 5 25 14 31 17 52 7.75 4.25 13 5 25 31 17 52 7 7.75 4.25 13 0.7 5 5 5 LLDA Corp. Funds 7.75 4.25 13 3 38.75 21.25 65 7.3 LLDA LLDA LLDA,PRRC EMB EMB EMB EMB Baseline 2011 Target (PhP) Targets/Estimated Budget (In Million) 2012 2013 2014 Target (PhP) Target (PhP) Target (PhP) 2015 Target (PhP) Budgetary Requirement (In Million) Budget Source Responsible Agency/ Institution
31 17 52 7
7.75 4.25 13 1.4
31 17 52 8
7.75 4.25 13 2.2
31 17 52 8
39
9.75
39
9.75
39
9.75
39
9.75
39
9.75
48.75
EMB
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
EMB
111

Goal: Promote partnerships and ensure the implementation of good environmental governance as means to achieve the sustainable development of the Manila Bay Region Program/Project Activity Unit of Work Measure IEMP Implemented Monitoring of Priority rivers Bioecological Monitoring and Assessment Baywide/ Offshore monitoring PhysicoChem Score Card Rating System developed/ Implemented Water Resources Management assess surface and groundwater quality pollution load contribution 0.05 0.1 0.1 Baseline Targets/Estimated Budget (In Million) 2011 2012 2013 2014 Target (PhP) Target (PhP) Target (PhP) Target (PhP) 0.4 3.32 3.75 3.98 4.5 4.78 5.4 5.74 6.48 2015 Target (PhP) Budgetary Requirement (In Million) 0.4 24.69 27.91 Budget Source DBM DBM Responsible Agency/ Institution DENR-MBCO DENR-MBCO
Implement Integrated Envi. Mgmt. Program (IEMP)
6.87 7.78
1.29
1.55
1.86
2.23
2.68
9.61
1.8
2.16
2.59 1
3.11 1.2
3.73 1.25
13.39 3.45 DBM DENR-MBCO
0.1
0.1
0.45
DBM
DENR-NWRB
112

Goal: Promote partnerships and ensure the implementation of good environmental governance as means to achieve the sustainable development of the Manila Bay Region Program/Project Activity Unit of Work Measure Staff and Stakeholders capacity-building activities conducted Development Exposure participated Technical and financial assistance provided(i.e., biogas tech., trainings, etc) Laboratory equipment acquisition/facility upgrading Baseline 2011 Target (PhP) 2.13 Targets/Estimated Budget (In Million) 2012 2013 2014 2015 Target (PhP) Target (PhP) Target (PhP) Target (PhP) 5.7 6.84 8.21 9.85 46.11 46.11 46.11 46.11 Budgetary Requirement (In Million) 32.73 184.44 Budget Source DBM Responsible Agency/ Institution Lead Agency: DENR Cooperating Agencies: NSWMC 0.6 3.6 0.6 0 3.6 8.4 PAWB
Capacity Building
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.2
DA-BAI (Other budget is reflected in lump-sum).
3.5
12
14
29.5
DA
113

Goal: Promote partnerships and ensure the implementation of good environmental governance as means to achieve the sustainable development of the Manila Bay Region Program/Project Activity Unit of Work Measure IEC/brochures produced/ disseminated on OPMBCS programs/ projects Orientation/ Seminars/ Workshop conducted with NGAs, LGUs and other stakeholders Baseline 2011 Target (PhP) 7.62 Targets/Estimated Budget (In Million) 2012 2013 2014 Target (PhP) Target (PhP) Target (PhP) 6.98 8.38 10.06 2015 Target (PhP) 12.07 Budgetary Requirement (In Million) 45.11 Budget Source DBM Responsible Agency/ Institution Lead Agency: DENR MBCO Cooperating Agencies: MMDA, DA, EMB-DENR, DPWH, PNP-MG PCG NSWMC DepEd DILG MWSS LWUA PPA DOH DBM LLDA
12.Information, Education, and Communication (IEC)
a. Promote IEC among Manila Bay Region Stakehold ers
2.006 0.13 0.25 0.10 0.10 1
2.007 5.31 0.25 1.2 0.11 0.70 3 5
2.008 5.31 0.25 0.4 0.12 0.20 3 5
2.009 5.31 0.25 0.4 0.13 0.70 3 5
2.011 5.31 0.25 0 0.14 0.20 3 5
8.04 21.37 1 2 0.60 0.9 12 21

(Agencies that have no indicative budget for this activity.)
b. Increase awareness, knowledge and motivation level of general public on OPMBCS
AreaBased/Major River Systems events/activities organized IEC materials for area-based developed/ Disseminated
114

Goal: Promote partnerships and ensure the implementation of good environmental governance as means to achieve the sustainable development of the Manila Bay Region Program/Project Activity Unit of Work Measure Media and nonmedia campaign activities organized/ implemented Quantitative/ Qualitative Research Studies conducted/ disseminated 1.25 1.5 1.8 2.16 6.71 DENR-MBCO Baseline 2011 Target (PhP) Targets/Estimated Budget (In Million) 2012 2013 2014 Target (PhP) Target (PhP) Target (PhP) 2015 Target (PhP) Budgetary Requirement (In Million) Budget Source Responsible Agency/ Institution
c. Evaluate awareness, knowledge and motivation level of general public on the OPMBCS
d. Publish Quarterly/ OPMBCS Annual Report documents and reports Yearly score card report Quarterly Monitoring report Yearly assessment report on OPMBCS implementation
115

Goal: Promote partnerships and ensure the implementation of good environmental governance as means to achieve the sustainable development of the Manila Bay Region Program/Project Activity Unit of Work Measure OPMBCS Monitoring and Evaluation system developed/ implemented Watershed Characterization/ Integrated Water Management Studies completed Five Year Fisheries Stock Assessment completed Research and Ecosystem Modeling and Forecasting proposed Total maximum daily load determined Total Loading Discharges determined Baseline 2011 Target (PhP) 4.02 Targets/Estimated Budget (In Million) 2012 2013 2014 Target (PhP) Target (PhP) Target (PhP) 2015 Target (PhP) Budgetary Requirement (In Million) 4.02 Budget Source Responsible Agency/ Institution DENR-MBCO
13. Development of Studies
Develop and apply
1 Study
DENR-MBCO
1 Study
1.62
1.62
DENR-MBCO
1 Study
3.6
4.32
5.18
16.1
DENR-MBCO
1 Study
10
10
DENR-MBCO
EMB
116

Goal: Promote partnerships and ensure the implementation of good environmental governance as means to achieve the sustainable development of the Manila Bay Region Program/Project Activity Unit of Work Measure Domestic Wastes Industrial wastes Run off Manila Bay Atlas Updated Refinement of baseline data on pollution loading - Soil Pollution researches - Assessment of sediments - Assessment of water contamination - Modified soli erosion measurement - Soil biodiversity - Biochemical pollution Other Studies conducted for croplands42
42
2015 Target (PhP)
Budget Source
Responsible Agency/ Institution
1 Study
1 58.22
8.65
6.28
0.45
1 73.6 DBM
DENR-MBCO DA
3.97
0.145
4.115
DA, PHILRICE
Long-term organic fertilizer use in paddy fields; Prospects of rice intensification and crop diversification in community based forestry management; Subsurface water runoff harvesting; Development of biological control agent for natural management of key seed transmitted fungal pathogens; etc.
117

Goal: Promote partnerships and ensure the implementation of good environmental governance as means to achieve the sustainable development of the Manila Bay Region Program/Project Activity Unit of Work Measure Bathymetric study on Manila Bay Sedimentation Rate study Sub-Total TOTAL 91.496 166.28 Baseline 2011 Target (PhP) 2000 kms. Targets/Estimated Budget (In Million) 2012 2013 2014 Target (PhP) Target (PhP) Target (PhP) 500 5 500 5 500 5 kms. kms. kms. 2015 Target (PhP) 500 5 kms. Budgetary Requirement (In Million) 20 Budget Source Responsible Agency/ Institution NAMRIA
5.5 340.792 1,616.83 185.158 4,015.19 210.444 5,215.39 232.576 5,901.12
5.5 1,060.47 16.916.11
UP NIGS
118
II. Area-Based Action Plan
119
A. Pampanga River System
120
PAMPANGA RIVER SYSTEM Area Based Action Plan 2011-2015

Goal: Protect the water in Pampanga River Basin and its sub-catchments and ensure that they are safe from various uses ( i.e. recreation, irrigation, transportation, fisheries and other living resources) Program/Project Activity Unit of Work Measure Baseline Year Budget(in Thousand Pesos ) Budgetary Requirement (in '000) Budget Source
Target
Budget
Target
Budget
Targ et
Budget
Target
Budget
Target
Budget
2011 A. POLLUTION REDUCTION WATER POLLUTION/ LIQUID WASTES 1. Dredge the River System . river system dredged . volume of wastes dredged . .Stretch of river dredged
2012
2013
2014
2015
4,000
4000
4000
4,000
16,000
Lead Agency (LA) LGU, DENR, EMB Coopertin g Agency (CA) : LLDA, PCG, DILG, DPWH FPA
121

Target
Budget
Target
Budget
Targ et
Budget
Target
Budget
Target
Budget
2011 2. Mandatory Clean up for LGUs % of LGUs implementing Clean up (DILG to issue MC to conduct regular clean-up) 5 Provinces, 12 Cities, 84 Municipalities
2012
2013
2014
2015 Lead Agency (LA) LGU, DENR, EMB Coopertin g Agency (CA) : LLDA, PCG, DILG, DPWH FPA DABSWM
4. Establish preliminary baseline data on the estimation of pollution loading
Estimation reports on baseline data on estimation of pollution loading established
2011
850
850
122

Target
Budget
Target
Budget
Targ et
Budget
Target
Budget
Target
Budget
2011 5. Determine/Upd ate volume of pollution load from livestock operation compliance to existing environmental management regulations Database established/update d on the ff: livestock farms, rendering plants, slaughter houses, meat processing plants, poultry dressing plans
2012 300
2013 300
2014 300
2015 300 Lead- DABAI
6. Monitor compliance to pollution standards in the croplands ( soil, water, sediments, plant tissue, pesticide, fertilizer , etc.)
# samples analysis monitored on different cropland parameters
2283
2283
2283
2283
9132
DABSWM
123

Target
Budget
Target
Budget
Targ et
Budget
Target
Budget
Target
Budget
2011 7. Establish Estimated Total Pollution Loading from Industrial and Commercial Establishment . % 0f estimate pollution loading from industrial and commercial establishments in compliance to effluent standards enforced
2012
2013
2014
2015 CA : DENR, EMB, DOH
8. Establish estimated pollution loading from domestic sources
% of total,domestic pollution loading that is treated in accordance with current regulation and standards
LeadEMB, LGU
124

Target
Budget
Target
Budget
Targ et
Budget
Target
Budget
Target
Budget
2011 9. Prepare Investment Plan for the Installation of Centralized Sewage Treatment Facility (STF) Investment Plan for the Sewerage System (SS) and Centralized STF prepared
2012 875
2013 875
2014 875
2015 875 3500 LA : LGU's, LWUA and Water District CA: DENR , EMB, DOH, Land Developer s LALGUs, Water Districts, LWUA CADPWH, DOH, DILG
10. Contruct and maintain sewerage systems and centralized sewage treatment Facilities (CWTF) in subdivisions & housing projects
# CWTF in subdivisions constructed
125

Target
Budget
Target
Budget
Targ et
Budget
Target
Budget
Target
Budget
2011 . Amount collected for Sewerage and sanitation services
2012
2013
2014
2015 LALGUs, Water Districts, LWUA CADPWH, DOH, DILG
2. SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
1. Support to RA 9003 Implementation
# SWM Model Site Established / Criteria on the selection developed # LGU supported RA 9003 implementation MRF upgraded 850
1250
1500
1800
2160
6710
150 2300
180 2760
216 3312
259 3974
312 4,769
1117 17,115
2. Collect and dispose floating garbages
volume of floating garbage collected /disposed
126

Target
Budget
Target
Budget
Targ et
Budget
Target
Budget
Target
Budget
2011 3. Conduct Solid Waste Management Audit # of LGUs with approved 10 year ISWM Plan 500
2012 600
2013 720
2014 864
2015 1037 2857
# of LGUs implementing Seggregation at Source and with Seggregated collection # of LGUs Functional NSWMC-TWG with MRFs # of LGUs disposing wastes in Sanitary Landfill
LA- LGUs CADENREMB, DILG, NSWMC
127

Target
Budget
Target
Budget
Targ et
Budget
Target
Budget
Target
Budget
2011 # of LGUs disposing wastes in Sanitary Landfill
2012
2013
2014
2015
4. Implement and Monitor ISWM Plan for LGUs
% estimated total volume generated wastes
3. Prepare 10 year Solid Waste Management Plan for NSWMC Approval
# of LGUs with approved 10 year ISWM Plan
500
600
720
864
1037
2857
128

Target
Budget
Target
Budget
Targ et
Budget
Target
Budget
Target
Budget
2011 4. Enforce and monitor compliance to RA 9003 % of apprehended violators of RA 9003 and RA9275, RA 6969 and other existing pollution laws
2012
2013
2014
2015
3. TOXIC AND HAZARDOUS WASTES ( Improve the Implementation of the Toxic and Hazardous Waste Management System)
1. Validate/Updat e existing database of Toxic & Hazardous Waste Generators (HWGs) within Pampanga River Basin
Report on HWGs database validated per:
500
600
720
864
1037
2857
129

Target
Budget
Target
Budget
Targ et
Budget
Target
Budget
Target
Budget
2011 . DTI List of Industries with potential HWGs by nature of business . DOH List of Hospitals and clinics
2012
2013
2014
2015
. LGU list of industries / businesses potential HWGs by nature of business
2. Mandatory registration of HWGs
. 100% Hazardous Wastes Generators (HWGs) tracked /registered
Assuming at 50%
1000
EMBRO MBCO Funds
LA-EMBDENR CA-DTI, LGUs
130

Target
Budget
Target
Budget
Targ et
Budget
Target
Budget
Target
Budget
2011 # of healthcare wastes facilities monitored Assuming at 70% 500
2012 600
2013 720
2014 864
2015 1037 2857
. Report on volume of generated /collected /treated wastes cases filed for non compliance 500
131

Target
Budget
Target
Budget
Targ et
Budget
Target
Budget
Target
Budget
2011 Importers /exporters of THW to secure permit /clearance from EMB as stipulated under Basei Convention on Transboundary Movement of Hazardous Wastes
2012
2013
2014
2015
4. SEA- DUMPING OF SEWAGE AND DISCHARGES OF OPERATIONAL WASTES FROM SHIPS
Enforce / Implementation of Administrative Order (AO) and Implementing Rules and Regulations(IR R) on discharges of ships generated Operational
treatment and disposal of shipsgenerated (solid and liquid) monitored
PNPMARITIM E,PCG, PPA
132

Target
Budget
Target
Budget
Targ et
Budget
Target
Budget
Target
Budget
2011 Wastes from ships
2012
2013
2014
2015
Activate of Baywide MultiSectoral Oil Spill prevention and response program activated/impleme nted/ monitored
133

Target
Budget
Target
Budget
Targ et
Budget
Target
Budget
Target
Budget
2011 B. HABITAT RESOURCES AND RESTORATION
2012
2013
2014
2015
1. Develop framework on the Integrated Rehabilitation Plan for Manila Bay
Framework Plan developed
134

Target
Budget
Target
Budget
Targ et
Budget
Target
Budget
Target
Budget
2011 2. Rehabilitate critical habitat and resources Critical Habitats and other resources ( Biodiversity , Mangroves, Fisheries, Forest and Soil, Rivers and other Wetlands) rehabilitated
2012
2013
2014
2015 SMO3, PENRO
Mangrove area rehabilitated /area
159
58
1276
35
770
35
770
35
770
35
770
4356
135

Target
Budget
Target
Budget
Targ et
Budget
Target
Budget
Target
Budget
2011 Ecological Guidelines for Mangrove Rehabilitation crafted
2012
2013
2014
2015 LA- PCG and MARINA
3. Develop Ecotourism Sites
Ecotourism sites Developed
5000
5000
5000
5000
5000
Ecotourism business plans prepared
100
`1
100
100
100
100
500
DENRFMB, PAWB, MGB, AND SMO'S with Local Partners (c/o FMB) PAWB
136

Target
Budget
Target
Budget
Targ et
Budget
Target
Budget
Target
Budget
2011 Ecotourism Management and Development Plan (EMDP) prepared 1
2012 100 1
2013 100 1
2014 100 1
2015 100 400 EMB, MWSS, LWUA NWRB
Ecotourism Management and Development Plan implemented
MBCO
EMDP monitored / evaluated
137

Target
Budget
Target
Budget
Targ et
Budget
Target
Budget
Target
Budget
2011 Wetland Management plan implemented (no) 1 333 1
2012 30 1
2013 30 2
2014 60 2
2015 60 513 PAWB AND PAWCZM S
Wildlife /Marine Turtle Nesting Sitesmanaged and restored (no)
300
300
300
300
300
1500
PAWB AND PAWCZM S
4. Estabilize and rehabilitate degraded riverbanks
Rivers/Streambank rehabilitated using Bioengineering Technology
4122
6000
6000
6000
6000
28122
SMO3
138

Target
Budget
Target
Budget
Targ et
Budget
Target
Budget
Target
Budget
2011 Bamboo Plantation established 1500
2012
2013
2014
2015 SMO3/PE NRO
Survey and Mapping of resources conducted
SMO3/PE NRO
Nipa plantation established
312.5
SMO3/PE NRO
139

Target
Budget
Target
Budget
Targ et
Budget
Target
Budget
Target
Budget
2011 5. Seedling Produced in Bulacan and Pampanga Province 3860
2012
2013
2014
2015 SMO3/PE NRO
Critical /vulnerable micro watersheds of existing SWIS &SSIP rehabilitated
2208
2208
2208
2208
2208
11040
BSWM,D A-RFU,IA, CENDRO, LGU'S
140

Target
Budget
Target
Budget
Targ et
Budget
Target
Budget
Target
Budget
2011 5. Development and Full activation of natural and man-made hazard preparedness and response system . Geohazard mapping and assessment of critical areas for land slides and flooding prepared/ developed
2012 1200
2013 1200
2014 1200
2015 1200 4800 DENRMGB
No. of critical municipalities mapped and assessed with IEC and monitoring conducted
DENRMGB
141

Target
Budget
Target
Budget
Targ et
Budget
Target
Budget
Target
Budget
2011 6. Coastal Geohazard mapping and assessment for Climate Change Adaptation and Sea-level rise No. of coastal municipalities
2012 100
2013 100
2014 100
2015 100 400 DENRNAMRIA
7. Water Quality Improvement (surface and groundwater)
data on surface and groundwater quality collected and assessed / Number of Provinces
250
250
250
250
1,000
DENRNAMRIA
142

Target
Budget
Target
Budget
Targ et
Budget
Target
Budget
Target
Budget
2011 8. Monitoring of Impacts from aquaculture fisheries and agricultural runoffs Run Off Monitored
2012
2013
2014
2015 BSWM,D A-RFU,IA, CENDRO, LGU'S
9. Establish and Manage Protected Area
Protected Area (PA) Management Plan developed
500
500
500
500
500
2500
DENRPAWB
PAMB Area / Special Committee Operations Area Supported
11
550
11
550
11
550
250
250
DENRLead
143

Target
Budget
Target
Budget
Targ et
Budget
Target
Budget
Target
Budget
2011 c. Full Site Diagnostic (FSD) Assessment conducted / number of sites PARTNERSHIP AND GOVERNANCE 1. Declaring specific areas in the Pampanga River Basin under Water Quality Management Area 2. Support to WQMA implementation Specific WQMA identified and delineated 3 sub watershed 1 50
2012
2013
2014
2015 DA-BFAR DENREMB
WQMA Implemented
650
500
500
500
500
2,650
1.5 M for 3 WQMA proposed FY 2012
144

Target
Budget
Target
Budget
Targ et
Budget
Target
Budget
Target
Budget
2011 # of WQMA assisted / operationalized
2012
2013
2014
2015
. Integrated Water Quality Management Framework prepared & adopted
Inventory on number of LGUs with WQM Compliance Plan conducted / reported
145

Target
Budget
Target
Budget
Targ et
Budget
Target
Budget
Target
Budget
2011 # Integrated 10 yr. WQMA Plan prepared /updated
2012
2013
2014
2015
. # of WQMA Governing Boards Established
. # of Updated WQM Compliance plan prepared
146

Target
Budget
Target
Budget
Targ et
Budget
Target
Budget
Target
Budget
2011 % of LGUs with 10 yearWQM Plan compliance Re: RA 9275 monitored
2012
2013
2014
2015
3. Develop / Adopt Coastal land and SeaUse Plan
Land and Sea Use Zoning Scheme developed
5 provinces, 12 cities and 84 municipalities
147

Target
Budget
Target
Budget
Targ et
Budget
Target
Budget
Target
Budget
2011 General guidelines/ plans for the implementation of local land and seause developed 50
2012
2013
2014
2015 50 MBCO
# of LGUs with delineated water boundaries of coastal municipalities and cities determined / updated
5 provinces, 12 cities and 84 municipaliitie
330
400
480
580
580
2370
148

Target
Budget
Target
Budget
Targ et
Budget
Target
Budget
Target
Budget
2011 # of LGUs with passed resolutions/ ordinance
2012
2013
2014
2015 LA-DENR CAHLURB,L GU's
4. Development and operationalizati on of the Integrated Coastal Area and River Basin Management system
Integrated Coastal Area and River Basin Management system developed and operationlized
5 provinces, 12 cities and 84 municipaliitie
2853
1000
1200
1440
1440
7933
LA-DENR CAHLURB,L GU's
# of ICM Plan implemented in coastal
149

Target
Budget
Target
Budget
Targ et
Budget
Target
Budget
Target
Budget
2011 # of Integrated Management River System Plan implemented in landlocked areas
2012
2013
2014
2015
5. Develop and implement environmental investment programs and projects
Investment programs/projects identified by LGUs
5 provinces, 12 cities and 84 municipalities
150

Target
Budget
Target
Budget
Targ et
Budget
Target
Budget
Target
Budget
2011 guidelines/manual for Public Private Partnership (PPP) developed Guidelines/m anual for PPP developed/dis seminated
2012
2013
2014
2015
6. Facilitate Proposals for funding to institutions / NEDA
Proposals for funding to institutions facilitated
7. Negotiate or enter agreements with private sector or Civil Society Organizations
agreements with private sector or Civil Society Organizations negotiated
151

Target
Budget
Target
Budget
Targ et
Budget
Target
Budget
Target
Budget
2011 Joint agreements established MOA/MOU signed
2012
2013
2014
2015
Reports in compliance of partnership commitments prepared
8, Crafting of Soil and Conservation Act ( soil and sedimentation quality standards for agriculture
Soil and Water Conservation act crafted
200
600
800
152

Target
Budget
Target
Budget
Targ et
Budget
Target
Budget
Target
Budget
2011 IEC and Capability Building
2012
2013
2014
2015
1. Capability Building ( thru trainings/seminars/ development exposure )
a. Capability Building ( thru trainings/semin ars/ development exposure ) b. Provide Technical assistance
Technical assistance provided Trainings on GIS attended 3 780 6 1560 8 2080
153

Target
Budget
Target
Budget
Targ et
Budget
Target
Budget
Target
Budget
2011 Exposure on Best Practices conducted PAMB training conducted
2012
2013
2014
2015
Marine Turtle Conservation Orientation seminar conducted
154

Target
Budget
Target
Budget
Targ et
Budget
Target
Budget
Target
Budget
2011 Farmers training conducted ( Organic fertilizer production, Tipid Abono and Soil analysis, Training on balanced fertilizer use and Judiciuou use of fertilizer.) 1 6 8
2012 51 8
2013 51 8
2014 51 8
2015 51 210
155

Target
Budget
Target
Budget
Targ et
Budget
Target
Budget
Target
Budget
2011 2. Evaluate awareness, knowledge and motivation level of general public on the OPMBCS a. Promote IEC among Manila Bay Region Stakeholders / Media and non media campaign activities organized/impl emented Media and non media campaign activities organized/impleme nted
2012
2013
2014
2015 SMO3
d. Distribute Information materials disseminated/ distributed (Production and use of Organic ferilizer , Balance fertilizer use, Judicious use
c. Information materials disseminated/ distributed
1000
1,000
1,000
1000
4,000
DA-FPA
156

Target
Budget
Target
Budget
Targ et
Budget
Target
Budget
Target
Budget
2011 of fertilizer)
2012
2013
2014
2015
3. Development of Studies
1. Management Strategy and Ecosystem and Habitat Monitoring
Management evaluation strategy developed
157

Target
Budget
Target
Budget
Targ et
Budget
Target
Budget
Target
Budget
2011 2. Refinement of Baseline data on pollution loading Conduct 0f Soil Pollution Researches Baseline data prepared based on studies conducted for the refinement of pollution loading (no) 2014
2012
2013
2014
2015 a. DABSWM and partner agencies
i. Assessment of soil contamination and heavy metal concentration in selected major crops
report of studies conducted
35000
158

Target
Budget
Target
Budget
Targ et
Budget
Target
Budget
Target
Budget
2011 ii. Phytoremediati on of polluted soils iii.Assessment of Sedimentation in selected sub-basins report of studies conducted
2012
2013
2014
2015
studies conducted / report prepared
1000
b.. Studies on proper valuation of ecosystems services
500
500
500
500
500
2500
159

Target
Budget
Target
Budget
Targ et
Budget
Target
Budget
Target
Budget
2011 2 . Watershed approach to assessment of water contamination from agricultural sources studies conducted/ report prepared
2012
2013
2014
2015 20000
3. Modified soil erosion measurement in selected sub basin
studies conducted/ report prepared
2,500
2,500
5,000
160

Target
Budget
Target
Budget
Targ et
Budget
Target
Budget
Target
Budget
2011 4. R & D for treatment of waste water, biosolids, sewage, sludge, etc. Report prepared
2012 2,500
2013 2,500
2014 2,500
2015 2500 10,000 Lead DAFPA CADPWH
4. Establishment of Demonstration Areas
demo-area established
161

Target
Budget
Target
Budget
Targ et
Budget
Target
Budget
Target
Budget
2011 a..Portable Biogas Technology demonstration sites (Recycling crop and animal wastesinto liquid fertilizer / methane capture via fermentation demonstration sites established / data gathered and analyzed/ report prepared 1 20 8
2012 160 8
2013 160 8
2014 160 8
2015 160 660
162

Target
Budget
Target
Budget
Targ et
Budget
Target
Budget
Target
Budget
2011 b.Establish demonstration sites thru recycling of wastes using vermicomposti ng Technology vermi-composting technology /demonstration sites established/ farmhold beneficiaries /cooperators selected 1 2 8
2012 16 8
2013 16 8
2014 16 8
2015 16 66 BSWM, PhilRice, PCA, SRA
163

Target
Budget
Target
Budget
Targ et
Budget
Target
Budget
Target
Budget
2011 c. Establish Integrated Upland Conservation (ICUF) Guided Farms via Soil and Water Conservation Technologies in Techno Demo Farm. ICUF Guided farms established (area in hectares) farmer beneficiaries (no) 1 1,070 2
2012 2,140 2
2013 2,140 3
2014 3,210 3
2015 3,210 11,768 BSWM, PhilRice, PCA, SRA
d. Rehabilitate /Restore esteros using Bioremediation technology
# of Esteros rehabilitated /restored
2400
10000
1000 0
10000
10000
42400
MBCO
164
B. Marilao-Meycauayan-Obando River System
160
MARILAO-MEYCAUAYAN-OBANDO Action Plan 2010-2011 Goal: Improve the Water Quality of the Marilao-Meycauayan- Obando River System
Program/Project
Activity
Unit of Work Measure
Baseline Budget(in Thousand Year Pesos)
Budgetary Requirement (In Thousand Pesos )
Budget Source
Responsible Agency/ Person
-Reduction of Water Pollution at the MarilaoMeycauayan- Obando (MMO) River System
-Establish /Install -Sewage Treatment Facility Pilot (STF) demo-area Demonstration established/installed Sewage Treatment Facility Area surveyed delineated with vicinity map prepared STF designed prepared LGU coordinated with resolutions passed Consultation with stakeholders conducted Data gathered/analyzed/evaluated Project monitored/ evaluated/
2010-2011 Target 1 demo area
Budget COPhP 10,140 9485, MOOE855
P/P/A B.1.b. Lead Agency: Implementation DENR-MBCO of Plans and Programs (2010 Continuing Fund) EMB Reg 3, LGU-MMO Note: 2010 Continuing Activity
161
Program/Project
Activity
Budget Source
2010-2011 Target Report prepared /submitted -Survey and Mapping of Pollution Sources and Pollution Loading within MMO area -Mapping of pollution sources / pollution loading established
Budget
1 study Municipality identified discharging wastes into the MMO River System Firms surveyed and mapped with and without ECC Firms mapped with and without waste water treatment facilities Firms monitored with effluent sampling analyzed and assessed
MOOE- 1,350
PhP1.350
Lead Agency: DENR-MBCO EMB-Reg 3
162
Program/Project
Activity
Budget Source
2010-2011 Target
Budget
Ecological Solid Waste Management (ESWM) Technology Intervention
Trash Trap /Net Installed
Lead Agency: DENR-MBCO
Area surveyed /delineated
1 technology applied/installed
MOOE1.010, CO 500
PhP 1.510
EMB-Reg 3
MOA executed with LGUs Data gathered/analyzed/interpreted
163
Program/Project
Activity
Budget Source
2010-2011 Target Report prepared/submitted
Budget
-Ecosystem Habitat and Resources Restoration
- Establish Pilot Demonstration Area for Constructed Wetlands
Pilot Area for Contructed Wetlands established
1 constructed wetlands MOOE- PhP4.200 established/constructed 3.400
Lead Agency: DENR-MBCO
(LGUs, EMB, WQMA, ETC.) stakeholders coordinated Area surveyed/delineated/selected Stakeholders consultation meeting conducted In vitro/ laboratory set up for plant propagation
CO800
ERDBImplementing Agency/Office
164
Program/Project
Activity
Budget Source
2010-2011 Target Species Identified/propagated Lay out /design prepared Pond compartment/structure constructed or installed Structure facility operationalized
Budget
Data (Water quality and chemical analysis of shoot root/ratio) collected and analyzed Report prepared/submitted
165
Program/Project
Activity
Budget Source
- Characterization and Vulnerability Assessment and Characterization of MMO River Basin
MMO River System Characterization and Vulnerability Assessment reported/published
60,380 hectares
2010-2011 Target MMO River Basin Vulnerability Assessment and characterization report
Budget MOOE- PhP1.800 1.800
ERDSDENRRegion 3
TWG Creation (Multidiciplinary Team created) Staff capacitated for Tasking thru workshop/trainings Focus Group Discussion Conducted Biophysical/socioeconomic data gathered/analyzed
Note: 2010 Continuing Activity
Thematic maps per watershed prepared
166
Program/Project
Activity
Budget Source
2010-2011 Target Data Analysis/Interpretation
Budget
Report prepared/submitted - Partnership and Governance Program Operationalization and Maintenance of MMO Monitoring Station Coordination and networking with other government and other MMO stakeholders MMO Monitoring MOOE Station operationalized/ - 400 Maintained PhP400 PENRO Bulacan
Database developed/maintained IEC materials produced/distributed Lecture related to ENR topics conducted Clean up conducted /facilitated
167
Program/Project
Activity
Budget Source
2010-2011 Target Project Monitoring Monitoring Team created and Evaluation
Budget MOOE- PhP600 300 CO -300
MBCO-PMO
RBIIMS developed Project evaluated/assessed/monitored Report consolidated/validated GRAND TOTAL MOOE 8975 CO11085 PhP20,000
168

OPMBCS

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Исходное описание:

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

OPMBCS

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Table of Contents

OPERATIONAL PLAN FOR THE MANILA BAY COASTAL STRATEGY (OPMBCS)

UPDATED VERSION 2011

OPERATIONAL PLAN FOR THE MANILA BAY COASTAL STRATEGY (OPMBCS)

UPDATED VERSION 2011

OPERATIONAL PLAN FOR THE MANILA BAY COASTAL STRATEGY (OPMBCS)

UPDATED VERSION 2011

OPERATIONAL PLAN FOR THE MANILA BAY COASTAL STRATEGY (OPMBCS)

UPDATED VERSION 2011

OPERATIONAL PLAN FOR THE MANILA BAY COASTAL STRATEGY (OPMBCS)

UPDATED VERSION 2011

OPERATIONAL PLAN FOR THE MANILA BAY COASTAL STRATEGY (OPMBCS)

UPDATED VERSION 2011

A. Supreme Court Ruling of December 18, 2008

OPERATIONAL PLAN FOR THE MANILA BAY COASTAL STRATEGY (OPMBCS)

UPDATED VERSION 2011

OPERATIONAL PLAN FOR THE MANILA BAY COASTAL STRATEGY (OPMBCS)

UPDATED VERSION 2011

C. Compliance on the February 15, 2011 Supreme Court Decision

OPERATIONAL PLAN FOR THE MANILA BAY COASTAL STRATEGY (OPMBCS)

UPDATED VERSION 2011

D. Rationale for Updating of the OPMBCS

OPERATIONAL PLAN FOR THE MANILA BAY COASTAL STRATEGY (OPMBCS)

UPDATED VERSION 2011

III. Updating of the OPMBCS

OPERATIONAL PLAN FOR THE MANILA BAY COASTAL STRATEGY (OPMBCS)

UPDATED VERSION 2011

OPERATIONAL PLAN FOR THE MANILA BAY COASTAL STRATEGY (OPMBCS)

UPDATED VERSION 2011

Figure 3: Strategy Framework Plan

OPERATIONAL PLAN FOR THE MANILA BAY COASTAL STRATEGY (OPMBCS)

UPDATED VERSION 2011

OPERATIONAL PLAN FOR THE MANILA BAY COASTAL STRATEGY (OPMBCS)

UPDATED VERSION 2011

C. Key Performance Indicators of Stakeholder Agencies

OPERATIONAL PLAN FOR THE MANILA BAY COASTAL STRATEGY (OPMBCS)

UPDATED VERSION 2011

OPERATIONAL PLAN FOR THE MANILA BAY COASTAL STRATEGY (OPMBCS)

UPDATED VERSION 2011

OPERATIONAL PLAN FOR THE MANILA BAY COASTAL STRATEGY (OPMBCS)

UPDATED VERSION 2011

AGENCY 11. DOH

OPERATIONAL PLAN FOR THE MANILA BAY COASTAL STRATEGY (OPMBCS)

UPDATED VERSION 2011

Management Action Plan Targets

A. Issue-Based Action Plan

OPERATIONAL PLAN FOR THE MANILA BAY COASTAL STRATEGY (OPMBCS)

UPDATED VERSION 2011

OPERATIONAL PLAN FOR THE MANILA BAY COASTAL STRATEGY (OPMBCS)

UPDATED VERSION 2011

Water Pollution Management Action Plan

Issue-Based Action Plans A. Pollution Point and Non-Point Sources

Management of existing wastewater treatment

Establishment/Construction of sewerage uses

Management of sewer network in all areas in the Establishment/management of common waste

water treatment facilities in key industrial areas and economic zone

OPERATIONAL PLAN FOR THE MANILA BAY COASTAL STRATEGY (OPMBCS)

UPDATED VERSION 2011

Issue-Based Action Plans B. Solid Waste

OPERATIONAL PLAN FOR THE MANILA BAY COASTAL STRATEGY (OPMBCS)

UPDATED VERSION 2011

OPERATIONAL PLAN FOR THE MANILA BAY COASTAL STRATEGY (OPMBCS)

UPDATED VERSION 2011