Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
I. Szapudi
Outline
Linear ISW
Coldspot Analysis
I. Szapudi
Photons passing through changing gravitational potentials are becoming slightly hotter or colder TISW where d d , d
I. Szapudi
In a at, matter dominated universe D1 = 1/(1 + z), There is a linear effect if M = 1, e.g., CDM If the universe is at (e.g., from CMB), linear ISW effect signals Dark Energy Caviat: there can be a non-linear effect as well
I. Szapudi
Physical Picture
I. Szapudi
Galaxy catalogs and the CMB are correlated due to the ISW effect This is a tiny correlation compared to the CMB uctuations, but it has been detected in several galaxy catalogs I will explore that cross-correlation with several techniques: correlation function, matched lter of the reconstructed potential, and imprint of superstructures. We use the SDSS LRG data set, and the WMAP5 maps Nota that combining all available galaxy data sets gives up to 4 cross-correlation signal (Giannantonio etal, Ho etal)
I. Szapudi
7500 square degree 2SLAQ cuts 746962 objects 0.45 < z < 0.75 with median z = 0.52 median photo-z errors z 0.04 matches 2SLAQ LRG spectroscopic targets
I. Szapudi
I. Szapudi
I. Szapudi
co-added Q,V,W ILC map MCMC map (joint t to temperature, polarization and foregrounds) KQ75 galactic foreground masks maps are smoothed to 1 FWHM resolution Healpix Nside = 64 maps, or 55 arcminute resolution
I. Szapudi
I. Szapudi
Agreement with Giannantonio etal, Ho etal, e.g., 2.1 from the MCMC map..
I. Szapudi
I. Szapudi
Beyond Cross-correlation
Non-optimal weighting No redshift information was used Cosmic variance of galaxy data, even though we have access to a particular realization Correlation between two datasets can arise for several reasons other than ISW (e.g. systematics)
I. Szapudi
Potential reconstruction
First we calculate local density using a Voronoi tessalation (adaptive smoothing) Then we some the potential contributed by each galaxy (r) = Gcr,0 m (1 + zmed ) c2 V (zi ) Vi |r ri |
Survey is projected to median redshift z = 0.52 Derivative of potential is calculated by reprojecting to the appropriateredshift using linear growth function Finally. raytracing through the linear potential derivative eld We expect that our TISW = (1/bg )TISW
I. Szapudi
(true)
(LRG)
I. Szapudi
(1)
with variance 2 = (YC 1 Y )1 , where C is the CMB (noise) cov. matrix is related to the bias (and any numerical factors missed in the prediction) looks like an optimal sum over a two-point quantity
I. Szapudi
I II III IV
Amplitude uncorrected 3.12 1.63 2.51 1.25 1.85 0.97 0.95 0.66
I. Szapudi
Noise biases
From shot noise and redshift errors
I. Szapudi
I. Szapudi
I. Szapudi
I. Szapudi
Voboz/Zobov algorithms to nd supervoids and superclusters int the LRG catalog Cutting out the highest signal-to-noise areas (simple weighting) Photometric redshift information is used Actual realization of the galaxy (DM) eld is used Linear use of the data Possibility of localizing the signal, especially if there is a non-linear component
I. Szapudi
Zobov
Roughly, a catchment basin in the density eld. Uses parameter-free Voronoi tessellation for density No smoothing of densities; instead, assigns a probability (based on density contrast) that they arose from discreteness noise Inverse of a VOBOZ (Neyrinck, Gnedin & Hamilton 2005) cluster
I. Szapudi Supervoids and Superclusters
I. Szapudi
I. Szapudi
I. Szapudi
I. Szapudi
I. Szapudi
I. Szapudi
Detection signicance
Robust against number, radius, color.
N 30 50 70 50 50 50 50 50
I. Szapudi
I. Szapudi
Potential + Superstructures
Formally a 5.3 signal
Coldspot
Non-Gaussian area (Vielva etal 2004, Cruz etal 2005) unlikely at the 0.5% level (Cruz etal 2006) Zhang & Huterer *2009): skeptical view T 70 K 5 area Rudnick etal 2007: hint of a supervoid in the NVSS (debated by Smith & Huterer 2008) Inoue & Silk (2007): 200 h1 Mpc void with = 0.3 Many other ideas (e.g., SZ, textures, Cruz etal 2008 for review) We performed observations with CFHT Megacam to test a 100 h1 Mpcvoid at z < 1
I. Szapudi Supervoids and Superclusters
Megacam observations
0.8 deg2 elds within 5 of the Cold Spot
ID A B C D E F G
Area (sqr deg) 0.80 0.82 0.81 0.81 0.77 0.88 0.79
95% Completeness (AB ma g) g r i z 22.7 21.6 22.4 20.9 22.8 22.8 22.5 21.0 23.2 23.4 22.4 20.8 22.6 23.2 22.4 20.5 22.4 23.4 22.4 21.1 23.9 23.3 22.1 21.5 23.1 23.0 22.1 21.1
I. Szapudi
Coldspot Area
I. Szapudi
Color Selection
I. Szapudi
CFHTLS Data release 4 same instrument, deeper, with i lter different 6 elds total 9.8 2 Used for calibration and to determine expected counts
I. Szapudi
I. Szapudi
z-Range (Median z) 0.121.22 (0.53) 0.201.03 (0.64) 0.141.17 (0.61) 0.310.38 (0.35)
I. Szapudi
I. Szapudi
Selection Function
I. Szapudi
I. Szapudi
Individual Structures
Field A, z = 0.6 a cluster, conrmed by visual Field B, z = 0.2, strong 60% drop in counts, a 2.8 uctuation Field F shows low counts overall, especially in the two low-z bins. Like to cause the NVSS feature Oscillation in D might be enhanced by anticorrelations, but the underdensity at z=0.6 appears to be real In general, there is more variation then cosmic variance would suggest: many elds deviate more than 2 in at least one bin Caviat: the lowest and highest z bin might be the most uncertain
I. Szapudi Supervoids and Superclusters
I. Szapudi
Marginalized Likelihood
I. Szapudi
Combined Fields
a = 0.3 100 h1 Mpc void would correspond to a density drop of b = 0.45 this would show up at z = 0.6 as a drop of 15% We rule out a void of 200 h1 Mpc = 0.3 at 105 level in the high z bins at z = 0.4 it is ruled out only at 7 103 Finally the low redshift bin shows a signicant underdensity
I. Szapudi
in terms of cosmic variance a deviation of 20% is only 2.3 It is seen in A,B,D,F, but not in the adjacent E We cannot conclusively detect a supervoid The data are consistent with a 160 h1 Mpc = 0.3 void that would do the trick We will have Pan-STARRS data in the future that will decide Note that the our previous supervoid measurement appear to indicate that the signal might be higher than our LCDM estimate
I. Szapudi
I. Szapudi
Summary
www.ifa.hawaii.edu/supervoids for more
Over 2 detection of the linear ISW from cross-correlation and (marginally better) potential maps from the LRGs Cross-correlation disappears when the best t ISW map is subtracted Signal from superstructures over 4 very robustly This appears to be in addition to the linear ISW signal Potential + Superstructures 5.3! The nature of the signal from superstructures is yet to be determined (astrophysical, non-linear, or...? )
I. Szapudi
Summary
www.ifa.hawaii.edu/supervoids for more
Our Coldspot measurements do not support the existence of a 200 h1 Mpc supervoid on redhifts 0.3 < z < 0.9 and it is unlikely that one would hide at z > 1 A hint of a large low redshift void that could be a reason for the Coldspot, however, we cannot make a robust statement with the present data Pan-STARRS will conrm the cross correlations with overwhelming statistical signicance: 6 for linear ISW. Pan-STARRS will conrm the strength of the supervoid signal (10 K ) Pan-STARRS will be able to detect a low redshift supervoid in the COldspot region if it exists Theoretical investigations of the non-linear ISW are on-going.
I. Szapudi Supervoids and Superclusters