Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
INTRODUCTION With the recent death of Ayen Chol in Victoria, controversy relating to pit bulls in Australia has risen. Local Councils are setting rules in place with the aim to breed pit bulls into extinction within a decade . With the Victorian Councils largely targeting pit bulls, I decided to look into dog attacks and dog related deaths in Australia. The full extent of a dog bite injury is difficult to measure as there are no reporting requirements in Australia. The death of Ayen Chol is only the second death in Australia by a dog described as a pit bull, which makes it seem very unfair that pit bulls are the main dog breed being targeted as surveys have concluded that pit bulls are not the most frequent dog breed related to dog attacks.
A dangerous dog is a dog that the local council has declared dangerous due to the dog causing a serious injury to a person or animal. Restricted Breeds are breeds that have been banned from importation into Australia (Restricted Breeds FAQ, Department of premier and cabinet, Tasmania).
PREVIOUS REGULATIONS Dog Control Act, 2000 (www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/tas/consol_act/dca2000134/) SECTION 19 1. If a dog that is not under the effective control of a person on private premises, or that is not under the effective control of a person in a public place, rushes at or chases any person, the owner of the dog is guilty of an offence. 4. If a dangerous dog or a restricted breeds dog, that is not a guard dog guarding non residential premises, attacks or bites any person or animal, the owner of the dog is guilty of an offence.
5. If a dog attacks a person, the owner of the dog must notify the council within 24 hours after the attack. 9. If the owner of the dog is found guilty of an offence under this section, the court may order that the dog be destroyed. SECTION 19A 1. If a dangerous dog that has attacked an animal or a person subsequently attacks any animal or person, an authorised officer may seize and detain the dog. 2. The general manager may destroy a dog seized and detained under subsection 1. 3. The general manager, by notice in writing served on the owner of the dog, is to notify the owner of the general manager s decision to destroy the dog. SECTION 29A 1. An authorised person, by notice served on the owner of a dog, may declare that dog to be a restricted breed if the authorised person, having regard to any approved guidelines relating to restricted breeds is satisfied that the dog is a dog of restricted breed. 2. A notice under subsection (1) is to a. State the reason for the declaration; and b. Advise the owner of the right of appeal. 3. For the purposes of subsection (1), the following breeds of dog are restricted breeds: a. Dogo Argentino; b. Fila Brasileiro; c. Japanese Tosa; d. American pit bull terrier or pit bull terrier; e. Perro de Presa Canario or Presa Canario; f. Any other breed, kind or description of dog whose importation into Australia is prohibited by or under the Customs Act 1901 of the Commonwealth.
SECTION 32 1. The owner or person in charge of a dangerous dog or a restricted breed dog must ensure that a. The dog, when in a public place i. ii. Is muzzled so as to be unable to bite a person or animal; and Is on a lead that is not more than 2 metres long, is held by hand and is sufficient to control and restrain the dog; and Is under the control of a person at least 18 years of age; and
iii.
b. The dog wears an approved collar at all times; and c. The microchip implanted in the dog is not removed without the approval of the general manager. 2. The owner or person in charge of a dangerous dog must ensure that the dog, when not in a public place, is housed in an enclosure that complies with the prescribed requirements.
SECTION 35 1. An authorised person may seize and detain any dog at large. 4. If a dog is seized and its owner is not identifiable, the general manager, not less than 3 working days after its seizure, may a. Sell, destroy or otherwise dispose of the dog if it is not a dangerous dog or restricted breed dog; or b. Destroy the dog if it is a dangerous dos or a restricted breed dog.
SECTION 39A 1. The general manager is not to release a dangerous dog to its owner unless the general manager is of the opinion that a. The owner has an enclosure in which to keep the dog that satisfies the requirements of section 32; or b. Satisfactory alternative arrangements for housing the dog have been made.
2. If the owner of a dangerous dog does not have an enclosure referred to in subsection 1, the general manager may, by notice in writing served on the owner, require the owner to build, or have built, such an enclosure within 28 days after service of the notice. 3. The general manager may extend the period specified in subsection 2 if of the opinion that sufficient progress towards the completion of the enclosure has been made. 4. If the owner does not build, of have built, a suitable enclosure within the period specified in the notice or such other period as the general manager allows under subsection 3, or does not make satisfactory alternative arrangements for housing the dog, the general manager may destroy the dog. 5. Before destroying the dog under this section, the general manager must, by notice in writing served on the owner, notify the owner of the general manager s intention to destroy the dog. 6. An owner served with a notice under subsection 5 may, within 14 days after being served with the notice, appeal to the Magistrates Court against the general manager s decision to destroy the dog. SECTION 41 1. A person may restrain or destroy a dog if the person a. Is being attacked by the dog; or b. Sees the dog attacking i. Another person; or ii. Another animal; or iii. A guide dog or hearing dog. 2. A person who restrains a dog under subsection 1 is to notify the general manager as soon as possible. When indoors or outdoors on the premises, a dangerous dog or restricted breeds dog must be housed in a way that it cannot escape , and that prevents the dog(s) from injuring any visitors entering the premises. The outdoor enclosure must comply with the following standards: y Have a weatherproof sleeping area
Contain lock(s) that have self-closing and self-latching mechanisms on any gates to the enclosure which can be (and are) locked when the dog is in the enclosure Be assembled and maintained in a manner which prevents the do from being able to dig or otherwise escape from the perimeter of the enclosure Have a minimum floor space of 10 square metres per dog Have a perimeter fence with a minimum height of 1.8 metres
y y
The enclosure must be constructed from the following materials: y Brick, concrete, timber, iron or similar solid materials; or Chain mesh manufactured from 3.15mm wire to form a uniform 50mm mesh, or weldmesh manufacture from 4mm wire with a maximum mesh spacing of 50mm (Things you should know about restricted breed dogs).
When owning a dangerous dog or restricted breeds dog, it is important that visitors to the premises to know that there is a dangerous or restricted dog present by displaying a prescribed warning sign. The signs are to be displayed to all entrances to the premises where the dog is kept warning that the dog is kept on the premises. The warning sign must: y y y y y y Be a rectangle with a height of 10cm and width of 30cm Be made of durable material Have a light turquoise background Have black bold 72 font, Time New Roman Text Have a 3 point black border around the sign Have at least one colour that is reflective.
NEW REGULATIONS Aim of the new laws is: To breed pit bulls out of existence within a decade . y Owners of dangerous dogs or restricted breeds dogs must have had their dogs de-sexed and micro chipped 28 days from July 1, 2011. In public, the dog must be muzzles, on a lead and under the control of an adult. They must wear the approved dangerous/restricted dog collar at all times.
y y
y y
At home, dogs must be kept in a child-proof enclosure with a concrete floor. A dangerous/restricted dog sign must be on each entrance to the property.
Any pit bulls or other restricted breeds that were not registered by September 30, 2011 will be destroyed by the local council. Local Councils now have the right to seize and impound wandering dogs that are unidentifiable and believed to be a risk. The council can euthanize the dog within 48 hours if unclaimed. They can seize and impound previously declared dangerous/restricted dogs wandering. They can then euthanize the dog after 24 hours if unclaimed. The new laws will bring Tasmania into line with other States of Australia. The restricted status means all pure-bred pit bulls, even ones that have never bitten, will be treated under the dangerous dog laws and must be de-sexed. The regulations now require that restricted dog breeds to include any dog of a mixed breed that visibly contains any prohibited breeds. Previously States and Territories have been responsible for their own dog laws. The Federal Government is now going to step in and lead an overhaul so that there is a national consistency within dog laws. Agricultural Minster, Peter Walsh says that the changes will close a legal loop hole and ensure that Pit bull crosses are included on the register for the first time . In the absence of DNA testing for Pit Bulls, the proposed laws provide visual guidelines to help authorities to identify the breed. The guidelines are called the 22 point system .
22 POINT SYSTEM
Identifying a breed solely based on appearances is likely to be inaccurate. Selective reporting in the media is leading people to rely on the media for breed identification. However the media can misrepresent the role of the breed in the incident. This then frames the issue as a breed problem, when it is a human problem. Some breeds are being misidentified as being of a particular breed or type because they are the ones that bite . RSPCA Victorian CEO, Maria Mercurio says that whilst the government s move to prot3ect the community is being welcomes, it is extremely difficult to identify dog breeds by sight and mistakes can be made. Unless you do a DNA test, even then it is very difficult if you have a number of breeds that have been crossed .
The RSPCA is currently concerned at the comments surfacing in the media that if a dog looks like a pit bull, then it is one . With many different crossbreeds, it can be difficult to trace the dog s heritage if the information is not available, and this information cannot be based solely upon the appearance of the dog. Even experts such as vets have trouble identifying what a pit bull or pit bull cross is, hugely due to the amount of crossbreeding that has occurred which has change people s view on what a pit bull actually looks like. The Queensland government has put together a 22-point identification system that consists of 22 descriptions of a pit bull and a rating system of 1-3 depending on how closely the dog resembles the description with 3 being highly resembling, and 1 being not so resembling. If the dog scores above 45, it will qualify for the death sentence. The Endangered Dog Breeds Australia (EDBA) demonstrated the flaw in the identification system. They applied the 22 descriptions to Pat the Chihuahua. Out of a possibly score of 66, Pat scored 50. According to QLD Animal Control Officers, the Chihuahua substantially meets the description of an American Pit Bull Terrier type . EDBA argues that if a dog that is clearly and
visually not a Pit Bull, can officially be proven to be one using the test, then the application of the identification system to any dog is ridiculous. If the Breed Assessor using the test states that the dog is of a restricted breed, the council will declare it to be restricted. However, if the certification shows the dog to be a cross of a restricted breed, the owner then at their expense- can arrange for a Temperament Assessor . If the temperament test states in writing that the dog is not a danger to public and is not likely, without provocation, to attack or bite a person or animal, the council will NOT declare the dog to be restricted. Due to the identification system and that it is difficult to conclusively identify breeds by appearance; vets could face huge pressure from clients to certify their dogs as non-pit bulls when the breed is unclear. In many cases, the vets will be unable to sign the certificate because cross-breeding often makes it impossible to distinguish between such different breeds such as Pit Bulls and American Staffordshire Terriers. Laboratories have also stated that DNA testing cannot positively distinguish between two breeds in cross breeding situations.
guardianship or warfare capacity. When the Roman emperor Claudius defeated the Briton Chief Caractacus in 50 AD, the powerful fighting dogs excited his interest. He then quickly seized the opportunity and began exporting selected quantities of the dogs back to his home land to satisfy his countrymen s appetite for entertainment in the arenas and coliseums of Rome. Once in Rome, the British dogs were then crossbred with their Roman equivalent. From the 50 AD to 410 AD, the breed was widely distributed throughout the Roman Empire for the use as fighting dogs. During these years they were also mixed with other indigenous breeds throughout Europe, creating a genetic melting pot for the bulldogs that are thought to have been the direct ancestor of the American Pit Bull Terrier. However, the Romans were not the last to use Pit Bulls in cruel and grisly blood sports. When the Norman invaded England in 1066, they introduced the sport of baiting. By the 16th century, nearly every town in England had its own baiting ring. In the baiting events, no more than one or two dogs were unleashed the bull. They were trained to relentlessly harass the bulls until they collapsed from fatigue, their injuries, or both. These episodes lasted for long periods of time, sometimes as long as 3-4 hours. However, the public soon grew bored of using bulls and introduce the creative flair of using bears, boars, horses and even monkeys. Baiting was made illegal by the British parliament in 1835. However this legislation did little to satisfy the public s desire to watch the dogs in fighting sports. Their attention soon turned to a new variety called ratting, where dogs were thrown into a pit with a varying number of rats. The dogs raced against time and each other to determine which could kill the most rats in the shortest period of time. This is where pit in the name Pit Bull comes from, the fact that ratting occurred in a pit. The public s attention fell onto the sport of dog fighting, mainly because it was easier to be hidden from the government than baiting and other fighting sports. Since dog fighting required smaller, agile dogs than those used for baiting, the fighting bulldogs were bred with terriers. The result was the bull and terrier, now commonly known as the first Pit Bull Terrier a muscular canine gladiator bred specifically for battle with other dogs. The sport was extremely cruel and sadistic. The canine fighters were put through severe training instilling in them an intense desire to spill the blood of their opponents. It was a common practise for these dogs to be fed a diet of blood and raw meat and to be kept in complete darkness apart from their few hours of training with their handlers. Their appetite for the kill was further enhanced by their handlers forcing them to run on a stationary treadmill with a weaker animal in front of them, just out of reach. The weaker animal became their reward at the end of the exercise with the dog being allowed to kill it. When the English immigrants arrived in America, their dogs came with them. As the immigrants travelled west through America, their Pit Bulls took on a broader and more humane function. The Pit Bull assumed the role of an all-purpose dog. In addition to
herding cattle and sheep they served as faithful guardians, protecting their families and livestock from the threat of thieves and wild animals (History of the Pit Bull). Staffordshire Bull Terriers and American Staffordshire Terriers have been seized and destroyed on numerous occasions because they have been mistakenly identified and believed to be Pit Bulls.
Whilst they all look rather similar, when all placed next to each other it is easier to see the difference.
Only a year later were Pit Bull Terriers and cross breeds banned in Brisbane, with the Mayor Graham Quirk stating that the Pit Bull was an extremely dangerous and aggressive breed and had no place in his city (Morton Bay Council refuses to ban Pit Bull Terriers until they proved to be a problem, Quest Newspapers), even though the Australian Cattle Dog and German Shepard had attacked more frequently than Bull Terriers. A news poll in QLD and VIC in 2001 showed that 75% of respondents believed that some dog breeds are more likely to bite than others. When asked how they formed this opinion, almost 75% said they had read it in the papers or heard it on the news (Breed specific legislation, Queensland). This shows that people are uneducated about the breeds of dogs involved in the attacks. Dr Stephen Collier of New England University has conducted investigations into dog attacks in Australia. His data on frequency by breed shows the Pit Bull to be exceeded by several other breeds. He said that about 14 human fatalities in Australia over the last 2 decades, none has involved a dog proved to be a Pit Bull. He further notes that the government s foundation for its legislation is to ban fighting breeds, yet 2 of the 4 banned breeds, Dogo Argentino and Fila Brasileiro were developed as hunting, not fighting dogs.
Dr Collier s study in 2001 (not including Gold Coast and Brisbane) showed that out of a total of 750 dog attacks over a 12 month period, only 3 of those attacks were attributed to American Pit Bulls. Separate data from the Gold Coast City Council recorded 162 dog attacks with 3 also being attributed to American Pit Bulls. Collier s data from 1997-2000, showed that there were 829 injuries to people cause by dogs that were reported to councils in NSW. Breeds for a majority of these attacks were Crossbreeds, unknown breeds, Cattle dog types, German Shepard types and Collie types (Breed specific legislation). Flinders University in Adelaide also conducted a research investigation into dog attacks in Australia. The results found are as followed:
Dog Bites - Table of frequencies by age group
Frequency
Per cent
0-4 yrs. 5-9 yrs. 10-14 yrs. 15-29 yrs. 30-44 yrs. 45-59 yrs. 60-74 yrs. 75 or more yrs. Total
This shows that a majority of people attacked by dogs are within the 0-4 year group. There are a few reasons as to why this may be. The child may not fully understand what not to do to a dog and may accidentally hurt or frighten the dog. It could also be put down to jealousy on the dogs behalf if it is a loved family pet, if the child is getting all the attention that the dog use to have before the child was born then the dog may attack out
of jealousy. It could also be down to the fact that the child was left unsupervised around the dog. The third highest age group was from 15-29 years, the factors behind these attacks could be put down to pure adolescent acts, with deviant behaviour and provoking the dog to attack by teasing. However some cases could be purely accidents.
Dog Bites - Table of frequencies by geographical location of the incident
Frequency
Per cent
Ocean or estuary Lake or river or dam Water slide Public swimming pool Factory or warehouse Mine or quarry Construction site Farm or primary production Other industrial Private enterprise Government public utility Public road Private road or driveway Footpath
Parking area Other vehicle area Train, tram, plane, ferry, other Sports arena or oval or court Public institution Private institution Own home kitchen Own home bath, laundry, toilet Own home living or sleeping Own home garden etc. Other private home kitchen Other private home, bath, laundry, toilet Other private home living or sleep Other private home garden etc. Residential institution Other, incl. tent or caravan Child care, not playground Child care playground School, not playground School playground
24.5 24.7 24.7 25.8 25.9 26.0 26.9 27.2 33.8 62.1 62.4 62.5 65.8 85.9 86.0 86.2 86.2 86.2 86.4 86.9
Other educational Public playground Private or commercial amusement area Camping area National or public park Field or paddock Beach Unknown or not elsewhere specified Total
From the data the two highest frequencies were in their own home or garden, or other home or garden. The reasoning for this could be linked back to the first table of data, where the common age group was from 0-4 years of age, with unsupervised children, or children wandering onto neighbour s property.
The following is a list 150 random dog attack cases: Dog Bites - Summary table of a random selection of 150 relevant cases (a)
Level of medical treatment received Casualty review Casualty review Casualty review
Age in years
64
Cut, laceration
Wrist
70
Cut, laceration
66
WALKING AROUND NEIGHBOUR,BITTEN BY A DOG TRYING TO BREAK UP DOG FIGHT WALKING ALONG ROAD AND BITTEN BY DOG HELPING TO TRAIN A SECURITY DOG AND FOOLING AROUND WITH DOG AND WAS BITTEN
Bite
38
Bite
Admitted
84
Bite
Forearm
38
Bite
Hand or NEC
Casualty review
78
TRYING TO GET BONE OFF DOG AND DOGS TOOTH CUT FINGER
Cut, laceration
Upper extremity digit or phalanx Upper extremity digit or phalanx Lower leg or NEC Hand or NEC
Casualty review
61
Bite
Treated no referral
52
ATTACKED BY DOG
Bite
10
54
Bite
11
24
BITTEN BY DOG
Bite
Hand or NEC
Casualty review
12
47
Bite
Tarsal bone
Treated referral GP
13
26
Bite
Casualty review
14
54
BITTEN BY DOG
Cut, laceration
Forearm
Casualty review
15
23
Bite
Upper extremity digit or phalanx Lower leg or NEC Lower leg or NEC Lower leg or NEC Upper extremity digit or phalanx Mouth external
Casualty review
16
70
Superficial abrasion
17
39
BITTEN BY DOG
Bite
18
47
Bite
19
48
BITTEN BY DOG
Bite
Casualty review
20
26
PLAYING WITH DOG BITTEN ON LIP BITTEN BY CATTLE DOG OWNED BY FRIENDS NEIGHBOUR
Cut, laceration
21
20
Bite
Casualty review
22
24
BITTEN BY DOG
Bite
Treated no referral
23
27
PLAYING WITH CAT BITTEN BY DOG BREAKING UP DOG FIGHT BITTEN BY DOG-BORDER COLLIE
Bite
Foot or NEC
Casualty review
24
27
Puncture
Forearm
Casualty review
25
22
Bite
Nose
26
22
Bite
27
64
BITTEN BY DOG
Cut, laceration
28
32
Puncture
Treated no referral
29
82
Bite
Casualty review
30
65
VICTIM TRYING TO SEPARATE OWN DOGS FROM FIGHTING, BITTEN BY DOG VICTIM BITTEN BY FRIEND'S DOG WHILE TRYING TO PUSH IT AWAY FROM HIS OWN DOG
Bite
Hand or NEC
Treated no referral
31
23
Bite
Hand or NEC
Casualty review
32
23
BITTEN BY DOG
Cut, laceration
Upper leg or NEC Upper leg or NEC Lower leg or NEC Lower leg or NEC
33
40
BITTEN BY DOG
Bite
34
48
FIXING CAR AND STARTLED DOG AND DOG BIT HIM ATTACKED BY DOG WHILST WALKING TO SHOPS
Bite
35
40
Bite
Admitted
36
58
BITTEN BY DOG
Bite
Abdomen or NEC Upper extremity digit or phalanx Hand or NEC Upper leg or NEC
Treated no referral
37
60
Bite
Casualty review
38
32
STOPPING DOG FIGHT BITTEN BY DOG DOG JUMPED FENCE AND BIT VICTIM WALKING INTO NEIGHBOURS YARD AND WAS ATTACKED BY A DOG
Bite
39
77
Puncture
40
19
Puncture
Treated no referral
41
22
Bite
Forearm
42
58
BITTEN BY DOG
Bite
43
18
No treatment
44
22
Bite
Casualty review Casualty review Treated no referral Treated no referral Treated no referral
45
15
WALKING IN PARK AT 1.00 A.M. & WAS BITTEN BY A DOG COLLECTING WORK MATERIAL BITTEN BY DOG PLAYING ON SWINGS BITTEN BY DOG PLAYING WITH DOG AND DOG BIT HIM
Puncture
Forearm
46
42
Bite
Forearm
47
23
Bite
Hip
48
19
Bite
49
34
Cut, laceration
Casualty
review
50
74
Cut, laceration
Casualty review
51
28
BITTEN BY DOG
Bite
Hip
Treated no referral
52
25
Bite
Ear
Admitted
53
46
Bite
Ankle
54
53
BITTEN BY DOG
Bite
Lower leg or NEC Upper leg or NEC Upper extremity digit or phalanx Upper extremity digit or phalanx Lower leg or NEC
55
13
Bite
56
63
Bite
Treated no referral
57
60
Bite
Casualty review
58
25
Bite
59
45
BITTEN BY DOG
Bite
Forearm
60
32
VICTIM PICKED UP DOG IN CAR YARD, DOG BIT VICTIM ON FACE VICTIM BITTEN BY DOG
Cut, laceration
Casualty review
61
18
Bite
Chest or
Treated no
NEC TALKING TO THE OWNER OF A DOBERMAN DOG WHEN DOG ATTACKED BITING HIM ON LEG CHILD WAS PLAYING WITH PIG DOG,DOG GOT STIRRED UP AND CHILD WAS BITTEN TRIED TO BREAK UP A DOG FIGHT AND WAS BITTEN BY A DOG WALKING ALONG FOOTPATH & WAS BITTEN BY A DOG IN YARD AT UNIT BLOCK & WAS BITTEN BY A DOG
referral
62
28
Puncture
Treated referral GP
63
Bite
Ear
Treated no referral
64
52
Cut, laceration
Hand or NEC
Treated referral GP
65
15
Puncture
Upper leg or NEC Lower leg or NEC Upper extremity digit or phalanx Lower back or NEC Upper leg or NEC Lower leg or NEC Lower leg or NEC Chest or NEC Lower leg or NEC
66
41
Puncture
67
35
BITTEN BY DOG
Bite
Casualty review
68
60
ATTACKED BY DOG
Bite
Treated no referral Treated no referral Treated no referral Treated no referral Casualty review Treated no referral
69
24
WALKING THROUGH GATE AND WAS BITTEN BY DOG BREAKING UP A DOG FIGHT AND WAS BITTEN
Bite
70
25
Bite
71
18
BITTEN BY DOG
Bite
72
14
PLAYING IN BACKYARD AND DOG ATTACKED AND BIT HIM ON WAY TO COLLEGE & WAS BITTEN BY A DOG
Bite
73
20
Cut, laceration
74
23
GETTING OUT OF CAR BITTEN BY DOG TRYING TO SEPERATE TWO FIGHTING DOGS AND WAS BITTEN
Bite
Forearm
Casualty review
75
20
Puncture
Forearm
Treated no referral
76
13
Puncture
Casualty review
77
23
TRYING TO STOP A DOG BITING AND WAS BITTEN HIMSELF HELPING DOG THAT HAD BEEN HIT BY CAR DOG BIT VICITM STOPPING DOG FROM BARKING BITTEN BY DOG WAITING FOR BUS BITTEN BY DOG
Cut, laceration
Ocular adnexum
Casualty review
78
30
Penetrating wound
Wrist
Admitted
79
80
Bite
Treated no referral Treated no referral Casualty review Casualty review Treated no referral
80
41
Superficial abrasion
81
29
BITTEN BY DOG
Puncture
Wrist
82
53
BITTEN BY DOG
Bite
Hand or NEC
83
26
BITTEN BY DOG
Bite
Hip
84
38
WENT TO FREE DOG TRAPPED IN FENCE DOG WAS DISTRESSED AND BIT HER
Cut, laceration
Hand or NEC
Treated no referral
85
34
Superficial abrasion
Treated no referral
86
36
BITTEN BY A DOG
Puncture
Lower leg or
Treated no
referral
87
27
BITTEN BY DOG
Wrist
Admitted
88
27
BITTEN BY DOG
Bite
Forearm
89
27
PLAYING WITH DOG BITTEN BY DOG COLLECTING FOR BLUE NURSES AND BITTEN BY DOG TRYING TO BREAK UP A DOG FIGHT AND WAS BITTEN
Bite
Forearm
90
31
Bite
Lower leg or NEC Lower leg or NEC Face cheek forehead scalp Lower leg or NEC
91
27
Cut, laceration
92
14
BITTEN BY DOG
Bite
Admitted
93
24
BITTEN BY DOG
Bite
Casualty review Treated no referral Casualty review Casualty review Casualty review Treated referral GP Treated no referral
94
42
Bite
Ankle
95
29
Cut, laceration
Mouth external Hand or NEC Lower leg or NEC Lower leg or NEC Lower leg or NEC
96
56
Bite
97
61
BITTEN BY DOG
Bite
98
CHILD-BITTEN BY DOG
Bite
99
23
BITTEN BY DOG
Bite
100
15
Bite
Upper leg or
Treated no
BY ONE DOG
NEC Upper leg or NEC Upper leg or NEC Lower leg or NEC Upper extremity digit or phalanx Upper leg or NEC
101
17
BITTEN BY DOG
Bite
102
49
BITTEN BY DOG
Bite
103
17
BITTEN BY DOG
Bite
104
25
Cut, laceration
Treated no referral
105
18
Bite
Treated no referral
106
71
BITTEN BY DOG
No treatment
107
55
BITTEN BY DOG
Bite
Lower leg or NEC Foot or NEC Lower leg or NEC Mouth external
Treated referral OPD No treatment Treated no referral Treated no referral Treated no referral Casualty review Treated no referral
108
20
BITTEN BY DOG
109
42
BITTEN BY DOG
110
19
Bite
111
17
GARDENING AND ATTACKED BY A DOG DELIVERING FLYERS AND DOG BIT HIS THIGH READING METERS AND BITTEN BY A DOG
Penetrating wound
Ankle
112
43
Bite
113
43
Cut, laceration
114
25
Cut, laceration
Treated no
digit or phalanx Lower leg or NEC Chest or NEC Upper leg or NEC Hand or NEC
referral
115
39
BITTEN BY DOG
Cut, laceration
Treated no referral Casualty review Treated no referral Casualty review Casualty review Treated no referral
116
39
Puncture
117
28
Bite
118
62
BITTEN BY DOG
Cut, laceration
119
26
MBA BLUE HEELER DOG RAN OUT AND BIT FRONT OF FOOT
Bite
Foot or NEC
120
16
BITTEN BY DOG
Superficial abrasion
Ankle
121
45
BITTEN BY DOG
Bite
Upper extremity digit or phalanx Upper leg or NEC Chest or NEC Hand or NEC Upper extremity digit or phalanx
Treated no referral
122
25
Bite
123
16
Bite
124
72
BITTEN BY DOG
Bite
125
26
Bite
Treated no referral
126
23
PLAYING WITH DOG AND DOG BIT HIM WHEN TRYING TO GRAB A STICK
Puncture
Treated no referral
127
18
TRYING TO STOP DOGS FIGHTING AND DOG TURNED ON HIM PLAYING WITH DOG BITTEN BY DOG CHECKING WHAT THE DOG WAS EATING AND BITTEN BY DOG PLAYING WITH DOG AND IT TOOK A FRIENDLY BITE AT HIS LEG WALKING IN DRIVEWAY AND BITTEN BY A DOG SITTING BY POOL AND DOG BIT HIM LIFTING UP DOG AFTER IT HAD BEEN BITTEN BY OTHER DOG AND IT BIT HER COLLECTING MONEY AND BITTEN BY A DOG
Puncture
Wrist
Casualty review
128
45
Puncture
Knee
Treated no referral
129
61
Puncture
Hand or NEC
Casualty review
130
21
Bite
Treated no referral
131
50
Penetrating wound
132
60
Bite
Ear
133
61
Bite
Treated no referral
134
59
Bite
Ankle
135
47
BITTEN BY DOG
Bite
136
26
PATTING DOG AND DOG BIT HIM PATTING DOG AND BITTEN ON HAND
Cut, laceration
Wrist
137
27
Bite
Wrist
138
40
Bite
Casualty review
139
47
Inflammation oedema
Forearm
Treated no referral
tenderness Lower leg or NEC Upper leg or NEC Other trunk injury Treated referral GP Treated no referral Treated no referral
140
35
BITTEN BY DOG
Puncture
141
Bite
142
13
BITTEN BY DOG
Bite
143
26
PLAYING WITH DOG AND KICKING A BALL AND DOG GRABBED BALL AND BIT HIS FOOT WALKING THE DOG,DOG GOT INTO A FIGHT & HE WAS BITTEN ON THE LEG PLAYING WITH BULL TERRIER AND HE WAS BITTEN DOGS FIGHTING AND BITTEN BY DOG
Cut, laceration
Foot or NEC
Casualty review
144
33
Cut, laceration
Casualty review
145
50
Cut, laceration
Treated referral GP Casualty review Casualty review Treated referral GP Treated no referral Casualty review
146
19
Puncture
147
25
BITTEN BY DOG
Bite
Femur
148
48
BITTEN BY A DOG
Bite
149
43
JOGGING AND BITTEN BY A DOG DELIVERING LEAFLETS AND BITTEN BY DOG WHILE RIDING 150
Bite
150
14
Puncture
Ankle
150
( http://www.nisu.flinders.edu.au/pubs/shortreps/canines)
When going through these 150 cases, I became aware of many reasons why the dog may have attacked. A majority of these cases were due to trying to break up a dog fight. Dogs are pack animals and when aggravated and wound up they will turn. Stepping in between two or more aggravated dogs is one of the most ridiculous actions you could do, when it would be just as easy to spray them with water or through a non hurtful object to distract them. Another common reason for dogs attacking was when food was involved. Once again dogs are pack animals, meaning they are scavengers, they bury their food due to if they starve later on they always have food to eat. Unless you know the temperament of the dog it is better not to take food of a dog. A reason I found interesting was that a lot of these cases were when people were playing with the dog and the dog attacked them. However, it is unknown as to what nature this playing was. If it was rough play then it would not be surprising if the dog got excited or agitated and attacked. Also what most people forget is that dogs are not humans, they have their own personal space. Whilst this space may not be big, it is there and should be respected. In a way similar to humans, the dog will attack when its personal space has been invaded. On the Kid Safe QLD website, Bull Terriers came in 6th in the frequency by breed with 6.3%, with the highest being unknown with 17.5% and the second highest was the Blue Heeler with 14.3% (Dog
The RSPCA Act found the following of attacks by breeds: Breed Number involved in attacks 63 Number of breed registered in NSW 35711 % of breed reported as having attacked 0.2
German Shepherd dog Rottweiler Australian Cattle Dog Staffordshire Bull Terrier American Pit Bull Terrier
58 59
23735 28850
0.2 0.2
41
40776
0.1
33
3244
1.0
NB: These data indicate that 200 + bites are attributable to other breeds
(Stephen Collier, PhD. Breed specific legislation and the Pit Bull Terrier: Are the laws justified?)
Bulls, he believes that there has been no reduction in overall dog attacks (Council officers attacked by dangerous dogs, Herald Sun). However, Victorian Agriculture Minister, Peter Walsh, says that the deed, not breed mantra fails. Once the deed is committed it means someone has been seriously injured or in the worst case scenario killed, then it s all too late. You cannot undo what s been done. In effect laws are made for those that aren t responsible and that s what we re trying to deal with in this particular case. The people who don t register their dogs appropriately are the same people that will not do the training courses (Dog fight brews over tough laws, The Australian). Many also believe that the correct socialisation and responsible ownership of dogs will lead to fewer dog attacks. The operations manager of National Dog Trainers Federation, Brad Griggs, believes that owners should be required to take a certified course in responsible pet ownership, regardless of the breed. He also suggests requiring certain types of dogs, such as Pit Bulls, to pass an obedience and temperament test each year (Dog fight brews over tough laws, The Australian). It is believed that dogs can show aggression due to factors including genetics, environment and learning. Socialisation is an important point, they should be introduce to people, children, cars, household items, other animals and other cultures so they don t get stressed. The Animal Management Officers Association of Tasmania, acting President Steve Rigby, says that the politician s intent was to get rid of Pit Bulls, which were only a problem when they fell into the wrong hands. They are status dogs, it s normally the rough-nut characters, the person who wants the dog to make them look tough, rather than have the dog as a family pet (Dog laws bite back, The Mercury). Jason Evans, who owns an American Pit Bull, says that she is a wuss, but that s the way I want her. What s happening is a lot of bogan people, the common bogan who is unemployed who sits at home and is into drugs, when they get a dog they are going to get the meanest, toughest dog. They get the pup, they kick it, bash it, give it the taste of blood and of course they will grow up vicious and kill other dogs and bite little kids. If you get them as a pup you can bring them up real good (Vicious bogan owners blamed, The Mercury). However, some views are not so comforting; with Premier Ted Baillieu saying the incident (death of Ayen Chol) was unacceptable and dangerous breeds had lost the right to exist . A comment on the Herald Sun website also read Kill the lot of them! Owning a Pit Bull is no different to owning a gun . The federal MP, Bill Shorten, has dubbed Pit Bulls as sharks on legs . Council staffs have reported physical threats after trying to enter properties in outer Melbourne to confirm reports of restricted breeds. A Pit Bull attacked a Brimbank
Council officer in Sydenham as he attempted to collect it to put it down (Council officers attacked by dangerous dogs, Herald Sun). The Endangered Dog Breeds Association has the opinion that all dogs have the capacity to bite; after all, dogs have sharp teeth. However, dogs that have caring guardians, which grow up with the correct socialisation and temperament, no matter what breed of dog, will very rarely bite unless their home or family is threatened. Understanding the importance of responsible dog ownership can prevent many of these dog attacks (Breed specific legislation).
MY OPINION
I believe that over the years, humans have begun to associate their pets as of human form, treating them as if they were their own child or other family member. Whilst I believe there is nothing wrong with this, I believe that some have forgotten that dogs are pack animals. It is fine to nurture them but somewhere a line has to be drawn. When playing with a dog I believe that some mistake playing with patronising. Just like humans dogs do have personal space, it may not be as big, but it is there. When this space is invaded, just like humans, they will most likely lash out. I do believe in the phrase deed, not breed as I think that there is not enough evidence to securely link Pit Bulls to be frequent attackers. From the research I have seen, other breeds have come out predominant in frequency of attacks, such as the German Shepard. Why this breed is not classed as restricted or dangerous like the Pit Bull I do not know, but I believe they should be. It is common to see a German Shepard as a police dog, but if they attack someone while on duty, they are covered under the Dog Control Act of 2000 as a guard dog or duty dog. I think that targeting specific breeds however will not solve the situation. My opinion is that the best possible was to reduce attacks is not to place the whole breed on the dangerous dog registry but specific dogs that have or have shown intentions to attack humans or other animals. From experience of knowing a dog that got declared as dangerous due to killing a rabbit, I believe that the legislation about declaring dogs as dangerous when attacking an animal should be altered slightly. As pack animals, dogs natural instinct is to hunt, unless your dog has a lazy temperament, then most dogs would chase a rabbit, or small rodent. If the dog was to attack another dog or larger animal at random then I believe that yes, the dog should be declared as dangerous, especially if the attack was severe or caused death to that animal. I agree that Pit Bulls are used as stage dogs to bring the appearance of looking tough and I do not believe this to be right. I think that any dog when raised appropriately and with the correct socialisation will grow to be a decent, good tempered dog. However,
when raised to look tough and to be aggressive, and not being socialised, I understand that that is the behaviour the dog will act upon.
REFERENCES
Angus Thompson. Council officers attacked by dangerous dogs, Herald Sun. September 28, 2011 12:00AM. http://www.news.com.au/council-officers-attacked-by-dangerous-dogs/storyfn7x8me2-1226148603613. Date accessed: 30/09/11 Breed specific legislation. http://www.dogslife.com.au/dogs_life_articles?cid=9446&pid=146514. Date accessed: 2/11/11 Breed specific legislation, Queensland. http://www.goldcoast.qld.gov.au/t_standard2.aspx?pid=428#current. Date accessed: 3/11/11 Dog attack fact sheet. http://www.gtp.com.au/kidsafeqld/inewsfiles/inews.2773.1.pdf. Date accessed: 2/11/11 Dog Control Act, 2000. www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/tas/consol_act/dca2000134/. Date accessed: 1/11/11 History of the Pit Bull. http://www.pitbull411.com/history.html Date accessed: 3/11/11 Linda Watson. Breed blame-game: banning Pit Bulls won t work. August 25, 2011 2:17PM. http://theconversation.edu.au/breed-blame-game-banning-pit-bulls-wontwork-3036. Date accessed: 23/10/11 Pia Akerman. Dog fight brews over tough laws, The Australian. September 08, 2011 12:00AM. http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/features/dog-fight-brews-over-toughlaws/story-e6frg6z6-1226131681378. Date accessed: 23/10/11 Philippa Duncan. Dog laws bite back, The Mercury. May 02, 2010 12:01AM. http://www.themercury.com.au/article/2010/05/02/143451_tasmania-news.html. Date accessed: 23/10/11 Philippa Duncan. Vicious bogan owners blamed, The Mercury. May 02, 3010 7:35AM.
Redcliffe & Bayside Herald. Morton Bay Council refuses to ban Pit Bull Terriers until they proved to be a problem. Quest Newspapers, August 26, 2011 12:01AM. http://www.couriermail.com.au/questnews/moreton/moreton-bay-regional-councilrefuses-to-ban-extremely-dangerous-pitbull-terriers-until-they-prove-to-be-a-problemmayor-allan-sutherland/story-fn8m0yu3-1226122534372. Date accessed: 2/11/11 Renate Kreisfeld & Stan Bordeaux. Dog Bites: Injury resulting from dog bites. 29/7/98. http://www.nisu.flinders.edu.au/pubs/shortreps/canines. Date accessed: 2/11/11 Restricted Breeds FAQ, Department of premier and cabinet, Tasmania. http://www.dpac.tas.gov.au/divisions/lgd/dog_control/restricted_breed_faqs. Date accessed: 1/11/11 Stephen Collier, PhD. Breed specific legislation and the Pit Bull Terrier: Are the laws justified? 2006. http://rspca-act.org.au/files/view/?id=532. Date accessed: 2/11/11
Things you should know about restricted breed dogs, Department of primary industries, Victoria. http://dpi.vic.gov.au/pets/dog-care/pit-bull-terrier-registration/things-you-should-knowabout-restricted-breed-dogs. Date accessed: 1/11/11
BIBLIOGRAPHY
WEBSITES: http://www.goldcoast.qld.gov.au/t_standard2.aspx?pid=428#current http://theconversation.edu.au/breed-blame-game-banning-pit-bulls-wont-work-3063 http://www.couriermail.com.au/questnews/moreton/big-response-to-campaign-tohighlight-the-problem/story-fn8m0yu3-1226120593407 http://www.news.com.au/breaking-news/victorian-pet-owners-fear-dangerous-doglaw/story-e6frfku0-1226125976262 http://www.ava.com/newsarticle/new-dog-laws-victoria
http://www.melbourne-petminders.com.au/councillaw.htm http://www.dpac.tas.gov.au/division/lgd/dog_control/dangerous_dogs_faqs http://www.mja.com.au/public/issues/aug4/thompson/thompson.html http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/lap-dog-takes-on-pit-bull/story-fn6b3v4f1226161384359 http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/more-news/man-bitten-by-dog-inberwick/story-fn7x8me2-1226130140080 http://www.perthnow.com.au/federal-government-to-unify-dangerous-doglaws/story-fn6mh6b5-1226132508249 http://www.asuvictas.com.au/headlines/18-local-authorities/131-dog.html http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/more-news/owners-dump-dangerous-dogs-toavoid-penalties/story-fn7x8me2-1226130903262 http://www.melbourne-petminders.com.au/Dangerous_or_restricted_dog_breeds.htm http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/national/owners-of-killer-dogs-face-jail/storye6freooo-1226135310408 http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/state-puts-death-sentence-on-dogs/storyfn6ck2c6-1226125409887