Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Ani Tejada, MD
Externalizing: behaviors Internalizing: depression, anxiety Prosocial: altruism, sharing, volunteerism. Cyberbullying: bully behavior through electronic media (cell phone, computers)
5/18/2011
Analitis (2009)
Involving:
Forero (1999)
Bullies appear psychologically strongest with high social standing Victims - emotionally distressed and socially marginalized Bully-victims - most troubled with problems in
Conduct School Peer relationships
Junoven,2003
Highest Victimization: Lithuania, Latvia, Greece, Greenland, Romania, Turkey, and Ukraine. Highest Bullying: Latvia, Estonia, Greece, Lithuania, Romania, Greenland, Ukraine, Russia, and Austria. Lowest Bullying: Hungary, Norway, Ireland, Finland, Sweden, Iceland, Czech Republic, and Wales
5/18/2011
Younger adolescents (<15 years) Males Loneliness Depression Anxiety Poverty, minority, non-primarily English Hopelessness Smoking cigarettes Alcohol consumption Truancy Lower academic achievement Poor parental support
Compared
reported:
to bystanders, victims
Lower achievement Feeling unsafe Feeling as if one does not belong at school (4 times as often) Feeling sad (nearly twice as often)
5/18/2011
Correlate of youth violence Victims have rates of: Physical illness Mental illness- depression, anxiety Violence Subsequent mental health symptoms Social problems Aggression Externalizing behavioral problems
Bully-victims: Most troubled Highest level of conduct, school, and relationship problems. Bullies: Increased conduct problems, Psychologically strongest Enjoyed high social standing among their classmates. degree of empathy and cooperativeness
Victims: Emotionally distressed Socially marginalized among their classmates. Bully groups: School problems Difficulties getting along with classmates.
5/18/2011
All groups:
Depression
Suicidal ideation
Victims:
5/18/2011
Victims
Highest conduct, school, and relationship problems. More internalizing problems More externalizing problems Fewer prosocial behaviors Less happy at school
5/18/2011
Primary: before problem Secondary: early stage of problem Tertiary: consequence of problem
Methods most used in the world: Dan Olweus Dr. Ken Birgy
1980s in Norway bullying by 50%. ( 30% to 70% others) System-wide program, parents involved. Based on: constant reminder of rules close supervision meetings, committees Levels School Individual Classroom Community
5/18/2011
Rules and consequences Restorative Justice procedures Mediation the No-Blame or Social Group Method Method of Shared Concern
Non-punitive problem-solving: There is no individual bully Information by bystanders: Not from victimsavoided Moderate severity, not for trivial or criminal Series of discussions
With all groups involved Refer to hypothetical bullies who can assist in resolving the problem.
5/18/2011
Intervene Improve Classroom Management Recognize and Reinforce Students Behaviors Ways to Defuse Angry Students
5/18/2011
Depression Anxiety Psychosomatic complaints Poor adult supervision or support Low academic grades Lower family income Absence of friends Truancy
Referral and treatment with behavioral health professionals Treatment tailored to specific needs
Pharmacological Therapy, individual, group, family
CB1
A moderate and statistically significant relationship exists between low self-esteem and experiences with cyberbullying.
10
5/18/2011
Bullying behaviours are reinforced when a bully does not experience negative consequences Huesmann and Eron (1984) Teachers and other school staff model bullying behaviours Song and Swearer, 2002 Discrepancy between reports of intervention
85% teachers reported intervening always or often to stop bullying 35% students reported that teachers intervened in bullying.
www.BullyPolice.org/NewMexico Kathleen Keelan. Prevention Consultants, LLC http://preventionconsultantsllc.com Olweus Bullying Prevention Program, www.olweus.org
NEW MEXICO B+ A. This section applies to local school boards, local school districts, and charter schools and governs policies to be adopted and implemented by local school districts with regards to addressing bullying. B. Each school district and charter school shall develop and implement a policy that addresses bullying, (Point 6) no later than April 1, 2007. (Point 7) C. Any such anti-bullying policy shall at least include, (Point 4) but shall not be limited to: (1) definitions; (2) absolute prohibition; (3) annual dissemination of the anti-bullying policy to all students, parents, teachers, administrators and all other school or district employees; (4) procedures for reporting incidents of bullying- confidentiality /protection from reprisal, retaliation or false accusation (5) consequences (6) consequences for knowingly making false reports pursuant to the anti-bullying policy; (7) procedures for investigation by administration of incidents (8) a requirement that teachers and other school staff report any incidents of bullying; and (9) a requirement that anti-bullying is included as part of the health education curriculum
11
5/18/2011
12