167 views

Uploaded by Nuansak3

- ch1odd
- A01_lec_16_1300_handout
- Chemical Bonding Notes
- d_11-05
- Good
- Basic UV-Vis Theory, Concepts and Applications
- 12.4.2012
- 1
- Chap1b Mot
- MO_theory_stuff.pdf
- Aieee 2007 Chem
- oled
- 金属有机化学课件.pdf
- Screening Percentages Based on Slater Effective Nuclear Charge as a Versatile Tool for Teaching Periodic Trends
- lec-30
- coordination chemistry
- ic010880y
- 7.THESUPERSYMMETRYAPPROACHES....J.Sadegietal.
- supervisionevaluation
- Atomic Structure

You are on page 1of 28

Wave mechanics / Atomic orbitals (AOs) The basis for rejecting classical mechanics (the Bohr Model) in treating j g ( ) g electrons Wave mechanics and the Schrdinger equation Representation of atomic orbitals as wave functions i f i bi l f i Electron densities and radial distribution functions Understanding the effects of shielding and penetration on AO energies Bonding Review VSEPR and Hybridisation Linear combination of molecular orbitals (LCAO), bonding / antibonding L b lli of molecular orbitals (MOs) (, and g, u) Labelling f l l bi l (MO ) ( d ) Homonuclear diatomic MO diagrams mixing of different AOs More complex molecules (CO, H2O .) (CO ) MO diagrams for Inorganic complexes

2

6 Lecture Course

Prof G. W. Watson Lloyd Institute 2 36 Ll d I tit t 2.36 watsong@tcd.ie

Lecture schedule

Lecture 1 Lecture 2 Revision of Bohr model of atoms Schrdinger equation, atomic wavefunctions and radial distribution functions of s orbitals More complex wavefunctions and radial distribution functions and electron shielding g Lewis bonding, Hybridisation, and molecular orbitals Labelling MOs. 1st row homonuclear diatomics MO approach to more complex molecules and CO bonding in transition metals complexes

Literature

Book Sources: all titles listed here are available in the Hamilton Library 1. Chemical Bonding, M. J. Winter (Oxford Chemistry primer 15) Oxford Science Publications ISBN 0 198556942 condensed text, excellent diagrams 2. Basic Inorganic Chemistry ( g y (Wiley) F.A.Cotton, G. Wilkinson, P. L. y) , , Gaus comprehensive text, very detailed on aufbau principle 3 Inorganic Chemistry (Prentice Hall) C. Housecroft, A. G. Sharpe 3. I i Ch i (P i H ll) C H f A G Sh comprehensive text with very accessible language. CD contains interactive energy diagrams Additional sources: http://winter.group.shef.ac.uk/orbitron/ - gallery of AO and MO h // i h f k/ bi / ll f AOs d MOs

3 4

Lecture 3

Tutorials

Expectation Tutorials are to go through p g g problems that students are having with the g course Tutorials are NOT for the lecturer to give you the answers to the i l f h l i h h questions or to give you another lecture. All student must BEFORE the tutorial

Look at the notes for the course and try to understand them Attempt the questions set and hence find out what you can not do! Bring a list of questions relating to aspects of the course which you could not understand (either from looking at the notes or attempting the questions)

Prof G. W. Watson Lloyd Institute 2.05 watsong@tcd.ie

It is a waste of both the lecturers and students time if the tutorial to ends up being a lecture covering questions.

5

Johann Balmer (1885) measured line spectra for hydrogen 364.6 nm (uv), 410.2 nm (uv), 434.1 nm (violet), 486.1 nm (blue), and 656.3 nm (red).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7OKPaKr5QM

Assumptions 1) Rutherford (1912) model of the atom (Planetary model with central nucleus + electrons in orbit) 2) Planck (1901), Einstein (1905) the energy electromagnetic waves is (1901) quantised into packets called photons (particle like property). E = h

Fluctuat ting electr ric /magn netic field Velocity, c Wavelength,

Balmer discovered these lines occur in a series - both absorption and emission where is the Rydberg constant (3.29 1015 Hz)

1 1 v = 2 2 n n 1 2

Balmer series n1=2 and n2=n1+1, n1+2, n1+3 .. Other series for n1=1 (Lyman UV), n1=3 (Paschen IR) etc. 1 3 Electrons must have specific energies no model of the atom could explain this

7

An stationary observer counts } i.e. frequency = v Hz , cycles/sec, waves passing per second sec-1

8

Speed of electromagnetic waves (c) is constant ( and vary) c = , = c / , E = h , E = h c / As frequency increases, wavelength decreases. Given e.g. e g radiowaves: =01m 0.1 = 3 x 109 Hz E = 2 x 10-24 J 3) 4)

Electron assumed to travel in circular orbits. Apply quantisation to orbits - only orbits allowed have quantised angular momentum (comes from observation of spectra)

h mvr = n 2 5) Classical electrodynamical theory rejected (charged particles undergoing acceleration must emit radiation) Radiation adsorbed or emitted only when electrons jump from one orbit to another

E = Ea Eb

6)

E energy (J), h Plancks constant (J s), frequency (Hz), c speed of light (m-1), wavelength (m)

where a and b represent the energy of the start and finish orbits

9 10

Bohr model

Electron travelling around nucleus in circular orbits must be a balance between attraction to nucleus and flying off (like a planets orbit) Electron feels two forces must be balanced 1) Centrapedal (electrostatic) 2) Centrafugal

F= Ze 2 4 0 r 2 PE = Ze 2 4 0 r

NOT EXAMANABLE

Energy

Ze 2 1 = mv 2 8 0 r 2

h mvr = n 2

F=

mv r

Ze 2 (mvr )2 n 2 h 2 1 = mv 2 = = 2 2 8 0 r 2 2mr 2 8 mr

r 2 n 2 h 2 8 0 = r 8 2 m Ze 2

1 KE = mv 2 2

Resulting energy

1 Ze 2 Ze 2 1 E = mv 2 + = = mv 2 2 4 0 r 8 0 r 2

Rearranging to give r

r=

n 2 h 2 0 mZe 2

mv 2 Ze 2 Ze 2 = mv 2 = r 4 0 r 4 0 r 2

Ze 2 mZ 2e 4 = 2 8 0 r 8n 2 h 2 0

-Ze nuclear charge, e electron charge, 0- permittivity of free space, r - radius of the orbit, m mass of electron, v velocity of the electron

11

Energy is dependent on n2 and Z2 (2s and 2p the same only true for 1 electron systems

12

Substitute quantised momentum into energy expression and rearrange in terms of r (radius) (see previous slide)

For hydrogen (Z 1) F h d (Z=1) energy

r = n 2 a0

En =

r=

n 2 h 2 0 mZe 2

n 2 a0 Z

13.6056 n2

a0 (Bohr) radius of the 1s electron on Hydrogen 52.9 pm (n =1, Z =1) 1 Radius (r) depends on n2 and () p Z Substitute r back into energy expression gives

En = mZ e 13.6056 Z 2 (in eV) 2 2 2 = 8n h 0 n2

2 4

n 1 2 3 4 5

nucleus

Energy of 1s electron in H is 13.6056 eV = 0.5 Hartree (1eV = 1.602 10-19 J) Energy (E) depends on

1 and Z2 n2

13

Note. The spacing reflects the energy not the radius of the orbit.

14

Radius of orbits

For hydrogen (Z=1) (Z 1) distance

r = n 2 a0

Emission spectra

( p (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5z2ZfYVzefs) y )

13.6056 n2

hv

En =

1 1 E = 13.6056 2 2 n inital n final Same form as fitted to emission specta Balmer series ( nfinal=2)

5 4 3 2 1

n=2 n=1

n 1 2 3 4 5

energy (eV) -13.6056 -3.4014 3 4014 -1.5117 -0.8504 0.8504 -0.3779 0.0000

nucleus

Note. Note The spacing reflects the radius of the Orbit not the energy.

15

Note. The spacing reflects the energy not the radius of the orbit.

16

Only works for 1 electron systems E.g. H, He+, Li2+ g , Can not explain splitting of lines in a magnetic field Modified Bohr-Sommerfield (elliptical orbits - not satisfactory) Can not apply the model to interpret the emission spectra of complex atoms Electrons were found to exhibit wave-like properties p p e.g. can be diffracted as they pass through a crystal (like x-rays) considered as classical particles in Bohr model

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IsA_oIXdF_8 p y

de Broglie (1923) By this time it was accepted that EM radiation can have wave and particle y p p properties (photons)

de d Broglie proposed that particles could have wave properties (wave / li d h i l ld h i ( particle duality). Particles could have an associated wavelength (l)

E = mc 2 , E =

No experimental at time.

hc

h mc

1925 Davisson and Germer showed electrons could be diffracted according to Braggs Law (used for X-ray diffraction) Numerically confirm de Broglies equation

17 18

Wave Mechanics

For waves: it is impossible to determine the position and momentum of the electron simultaneously Heisenberg Uncertainty principle Use probability of finding an electron from 2 (actually * but functions we will deal with are real) Where is is a wave function and a solution of the Schrdinger equation g q (1927). The time-independent form of the Schrdinger equation for the hydrogen atom is:

h 8 m

2 2 2

What does this mean for atoms Electrons in orbits must have an integer number of wavelengths E.g. n=4 and n=5 are allowed These create continuous or standing waves (like on a guitar string) E.g. n=4.33 is not allowed The wavefunction is not continuous

2

e = E 4 r

2

0

=

2

+ + x y z

2 2 2 2

Kinetic energy

Potential energy

Total energy

19

The wave nature of electrons brings in the quantized nature of the orbital energies.

20

Schrdinger equation can be solved exactly for 1 electron systems Solved by trial and error manipulations for more electrons 3 quantum numbers describing a three dimensional space called an atomic orbital: n, l, m (and spin quantum number describing the electron s) n = principal quantum number, defines the orbital size with values 1 to l= azimuthal or angular momentum quantum number, defines shape. For a given value of n, l has values 0 to (n-1). g , ( )

l has values 0 to (n-1) m has values from +l through 0 to l

n l ml Orbital n l ml Oribtal 3 0 0 3s

1 0 0 1s 3 1 -1 3p 3 1 0 3p 3 1 1 3p

2 0 0 2s 3 2 -2 3d

2 1 -1 2p 3 2 -1 3d

2 1 0 2p 3 2 0 3d 3 2 1 3d

2 1 1 2p 3 2 2 3d

ml = magnetic quantum number, defines the orbital orientation. For i F a given value of l ml h values from +l th l f l, has l f through 0 to l. h t l

21

22

Last Lecture

Recap of the Bohr model Electrons Assumptions Energies / emission spectra Radii Problems with Bohr model Only works for 1 electron atoms Can not explain splitting by a magnetic field Wave-particle duality Wave mechanics Schrdinger Solutions give quantum number n l ml n, l, atomic orbitals

24

Prof G. W. Watson P fG W W t Lloyd Institute 2.05 watsong@tcd.ie

Representations of Orbitals:

For an atomic system containing one electron (e.g. H, He+ etc.) The wavefunction, , is a solution of the Schrdinger equation It describes the behaviour of an electron in region of space called an atomic orbital ( - phi) Each orbital wavefunction ( ) is most easily described in two parts radial term which changes as a function of distance from the nucleus angular terms which changes as a function of angles l hi h h f i f l xyz= radial(r) angular(,) () (, ) Orbitals have SIZE determined by Rnl(r) - radial part y ( ) g p (p ) SHAPE determined by Ylm(,) - angular part (spherical harmonics) ENERGY determined by the Schrdinger equation

25

Polar Coordinates

To describe the wavefunction of atomic orbitals we must describe it in three dimensional space For an atom it is more appropriate to use spherical polar coordinates:

= Rnl(r) Ylm(,) () (, )

26

General hydrogen like orbitals Rnl(r) 1s

Z 2 2 e ( r a 0

3 2)

Radial Wavefunction

R(r) of the 1s orbital of H it decays exponentially with r it has a maximum at r = 0

4

Ylm(,)

R(r) =

2e

(r )

1 4

2Z n a0

For hydrogen this simplifies as Z=1 and ao=1 (in atomic units) and thus = 2. Hence Normalisation Constants are such that C h h Rnl(r) Ylm(,) 1s

2e

(r )

(1s)2

Misleading does not take into account the volume R(r)2 increases toward r = 0 Volume very small so probability of being at small r is small

27

R(r) in a.u.

1 2

2 = 1

1s

0 1 2 3 4 5

that is the probability of the electron p in an orbital must be 1 when all space is considered

Radius (a.u)

28

Probability of an electron at a radius r (RDF) is given by probability of an electron at a point which has radius r multiplied by the volume at a radius of r

General

2s(r)

1 Z 2 ( 2 r )e ( r 2 2 a0

3

3s(r)

2)

Consider a sphere volume as we move at a small slice is 4r2 r By differentiation, the volume of a sphere = so

V = 4r 2 r

4 3 r 3

8

1 Z 2 (6 6 r + ( r ) 2 )e ( r 9 3 a0

2)

2Z n a0

=

3s

2Z n a0

6 4r2 R(r)2 )

1s

For H

2s

1

Z=1, n=2, =1

2 2 (2 r ) e ( r 2)

2 0 0 1 2 3 4 5

2 1 2 ( r / 3) 6 4 r + r e 9 3 3

The form of the wave functions is the important concept not the precise equation

Note R(r) has functional form Normalisation constant * polynomial (increasing order with n) * exponential (-r/n)

29 30

Radius (a.u)

For H 2s(r) =

1 2 2 (2 r ) e ( r 2)

The absolute sign of a wave function is not important. The wave function has NO PHYSICAL SIGNIFICANCE the electron density is related to the square of the wave function This is the same irrespective of the sign Wavefunction signs matter when two orbitals interact with each other (see later) Some books have the 2s as opposite sign you can see that the electron density R(r)2 is the same

0.8 0.6

0.4 04

For H 3s(r) =

2 1 2 ( r / 3) 6 4 r + r e 9 3 3

0.5 05

R(r) = 0

RADIAL NODE

R R(r) in a. .u.

0.4 0.3 03

2s

R(r) in a.u. i

2s

6 8 10

R(r) in a.u. )

2s at (2-r) = 0 (i.e. r=2 a.u.) 3s changes sign twice with two nodes (r =1.9, 7.1 a.u.) Caused by the order of the polynomial !

0.4

(2s)2

0.2 02

-2s

Radius (a.u)

31

Radius (a.u)

10

Radius (a.u)

32

Radial Nodes

Number of radial node = n l 1 1s = 1 0 1 = 0 2s = 2 0 1 = 1 2p = 2 1 1 = 0 3s = 3 0 1 = 2 3p = 3 1 1 = 1 1s 1 peak. 2s 2 peaks 3s 3 3 peaks k 3d = 3 2 1 = 0

RDFs of ns orbitals

Maximum at r = a0 Maximum at r 5 a0 Maximum at r 13 a0 M i 0 - Bohr Model - Bohr Model -B h M d l Bohr Model radius of a0 radius of 4 a0 radius of 9 a0 di f

8

Why are there radial nodes ? Pauli exclusion principle no two electrons can have the same set of QNs Actually no two electron can overlap ( occupy same space) y p (i.e. py p ) Overlap integral = A B = 0 AOs are said to be Orthogonal

*

1s

6 4r2 R(r)2 R 4 2

2s 2 3s

(analogous to normalisation)

Satisfied for AOs with same l by having change(s) in the wave function sign AO s Satisfied for AOs with different l angular component ensures no overlap

33

10

15

20

Radius (a.u)

34

Represent orbitals, so far radial and angular terms In 2D we can use dot diagrams to look at the whole wave function s orbitals have no angular component spherical symmetry Dot diagrams show electron density within a plane no sign Can see where density goes to zero nodes Can see how greater volume as r increases makes most probable distance. 1s 1 2s 2 3s

Boundary surface

Represent the wave function in 3D Draw a 3D contour at a given value of Alternatively can define contour such that in enclosed a space which the electron spends most of its time Shows the shape and size of the orbital Can not see the inner structure of the wave function

2

R(r) in a.u. a

1s

1

Boundary surface

0 0 1 2 3 4 5

Radius (a.u)

35 36

p orbitals - wavefunctions

There are three p orbitals for each value of n (px, py, pz) The radial function is the same for all np orbitals p The angular terms are different different shapes (orientations) Angular terms are the same for different n 2px, 3px, 4px Wave function for 2p and 3p orbitals R(r)

R(2 p) = 1 Z 2 6 a0

3 2

Radial wave function for hydrogen p orbitals (Z=1) p for 3p n = 3 p for 2p n = 2 = 1

R(2 p) = 1 re ( r 2 6

2)

= 2/3

3)

R (3 p ) =

Y( )

1

2Z n a0

1 2 r 2 r ( 2r 4 e 9 6 33

re ( r

2)

R(r) in a.u. )

1 Z 2 (4 r ) re ( r R (3 p ) = 9 6 a0

2)

Polynomial nodes Equation for no. of radial nodes n l 1 2p =0 , 3p =1 Ensures 2p and 3p orthogonal All p orbitals are multiplied by r R(r) = 0 at r = 0 Required to match the angular function q g angular node

37

38

2p

3 Y ( px ) = 4

sin( ) sin( )

3p

Radius (a.u)

All p orbitals have the same shape Angular function give rise to direction Can represent p orbital as dot diagrams or boundary surfaces

3 Y ( pz ) = 4

1 2

p orbitals RDFs

Radial distribution function show probability at a given radius 2p function no nodes, maximum at r = 4 a0 (same as n=2 for Bohr model) 3p function two peaks, maximum at r 12 a0 (not the same as Bohr)

2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 0 5 10 15 20

cos( )

3 Y ( px ) = 4

sin( ) cos( )

3 Y ( px ) = 4

sin( ) sin( )

4r R( (r)

1 angular nodal plane px (yz plane), py (xz plane) pz (xy plane) Ensures that p orbitals are orthogonal to s orbitals g

2p 3p

Radius (a.u) ( )

39

40

Last week

Lecture 3 More complex wave functions, radial distribution functions and electron shielding Revision of Lewis bonding and hybridization Prof G. W. Watson Lloyd Institute 2.05

watsong@tcd.ie t @t d i

Solutions of the Schrdinger equation for atoms Atomic orbitals () Defined three quantum number (n, l, ml) Defined polar coordinates radial and angular terms

Examined wavefuntions of the s orbitals Angular term constant for s orbitals Wavefunction as constant * polynomial * exponential Decays as e ( r / n ) the larger n the more diffuse the orbital Defined radial nodes and examined there number (polynomial n l -1) Discussed the requirement for radial nodes Pauli exclusion principle p orbitals Radial functions similar to s orbital (except additional r) R(0) =0 0 Angular terms define shapes px, py and pz same for different n

Radial distribution function for p orbitals

42

Five d orbitals for each value of n (n 3)

l = 2 , ml = -2, -1, 0, 1, 2

d xy , d yz , d xy , d z , d x y irrespective of n Angular functions same for same shape for 3d, 4d, 5d orbitals using boundary surfaces p g y

2 2 2

Wave functions slightly more complicated (constant * polynomial * r2 * exp) Radial wave functions same for all 3d orbital

R (3d ) = 1 Z 2 ( r ) 2 e ( r 9 30 a0

0.1 0.08

Five different angular function e.g. Two angular nodes planes orthogonal to s (0) and p (1) e.g. dxy Nodal planes in g p xy and xz (yz) dxy (xz)

15 Y (d xz ) = 16

2)

Max probability at r = 9 a0

R( in a.u. (r)

1.5

AOs with 0 nodes have max probability at same radius as Bohr model 4d orbital has 1 node

4r2 R(r)2

3d - R(r)

3d - RDF

1

0.5

dz

Radius (a.u)

43

44

f orbitals

Almost no covalent bonding shape not really important

Penetration

The RDFs of AOs within a given principle QN (n) have different shapes Number of nodes n l - 1 3s 2 nodes n=3

l=3 Seven different angular function for each n (n 4) f block is 14 element wide, same shape for 4f, 5f etc Radial functions same for all nf orbitals Three angular nodes (nodal planes) orthogonal to s, p and d orbitals

3p

1 node

3d

0 nodes

3s has a peak very close to the nucleus 3p has a peak close to the nucleus 1.5 These close peaks have a very strong p y g interaction with the nucleus 3s is said to be the most penetrating Penetration 3s > 3p > 3d

3d

3p 3s

1 4r R(r)

2 2

0.5

0 0 5 10 15 20

Radius (a.u)

45

46

Can t C not analytically solve the S h di l ti ll l th Schrdinger equation for multi-electron atoms ti f lti l t t We assume hydrogen like wave functions for multi-electron atoms Nuclear charge increases with atomic No. electrons repel each other and shield the nucleus from other electrons Effective nuclear charge Zeff = Z S S = a screening or shielding constant E.g. Li atom why is the electronic configuration 1s22s1 and not 1s2 2p1 ? 1s electrons shields the valence electrons from the nuclear charge p y 2s penetrates more effectively feels a greater nuclear charge 2p penetrates less effectively 2s is filled first E(1s) < E(2s) < E(2p) E(ns) < E(np) < E(nd)

0 0 5 Radius (a.u) 10 8

Periodic table

Shielding and penetration E(ns) < E(np) < E(nd) < E(nf)

This gives rise to electronic configuration of atoms and the order of elements in the periodic table Electrons are filled in increasing energy (Aufbau principle) and electrons fill degenerate (same energy) levels singularly first to give maximum spin (Hund s (Hunds rule) E(4s) < E(3d) K, Ca 1s 3d 5d 4f

48

1s

4r R(r)

2p 2s

2s 3s 4s 6s

1s 2p 3p

47

More complex results of penetration and shielding Energy levels vs atomic number gy

For H (Z=1) all orbitals within a principle QN have same energy For multi electron atoms p penetration follows

s>p>d>f

For K and Ca the E(3d) > E(4s), Sc on the E(3d) < E(4s) (but close) If 4s electron go into 3d orbital the extra e-e repulsion and shielding cause the 3d to rise above 4s again hence the strange energy level diagram Result is that TM s loose 4s electrons first when ionized TMs Energy 4p {

3d shielded very effectively by orbitals of n 3 and 3d almost does not change in energy with Z until Z = 19 4s filled before 3d

3d 4s 4

4p

4s

However n = 4 does not shield 3d effectively energy drops Similar pattern for 4d and 4f

49

3d

Increasing Z K Ca Sc Ti

50

Need to be able to draw AOs when considering their interactions in MOs So far diagrams have been to help visualise the 3D nature of AOs g p Simple drawings are all you need !!!!!

L li d view of bonding Localised i f b di Views covalent bonds as occurring between two atoms Each bond is independent of the others p Each single bond is made up of two shared electrons One electron is usually provided by each atom Each 1st and 2nd row atom attains a noble gas configuration (usually) Shape obtained by VSEPR (Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion) e.g. H2 H +

51

52

Lewis bonding

Octet rule for main group elements / 18 electron rule for transition metals All atoms have (or a share of) 8 electrons ( ( ) (main) or 18 electrons (TM) ) ( ) Gives rise to noble has configuration Stability since all valence levels filled Diatomics F2

Oxygen atom has 6 valence electrons and each hydrogen has 1 electron

2H

+ F

F F

Lewis bonding in H2O Oxygen has 8 electron, hydrogen has 2 electron yg , y g Oxygen hydrogen interactions share 2 electron Oxygen also has two lone pairs

H O

O O

4 electron shared bond order = 2 OO

53

Shape VSEPR Electrons repel each other (lone pairs repulsion > than bonding pairs) Oxygen has 2 bond pairs and 2 lone pairs 4 directions to consider Accommodate 4 directions Tetrahedral shape p o H2O is bent with H-O-H angle of 104.5 Compares with a perfect tetrahedral of 109.45o lone pair repulsion

54

Used different symbols for electrons on adjacent atoms

Some structures to not obey the 8 electron rule. e.g PF5 g 90o

4H

2 C H

H C C

CC CH

F P F F F

120o

Carbon atoms share 4 electron bond order = 2 Carbon hydrogen interactions share 2 electrons

Shape VSEPR Electrons repel each other Carbon atoms have 3 directions bond to C and two bonds to H Accommodate 3 bond direction 120o in a plane (molecule is flat)

(only the electrons round the P are shown for clarity) F atoms have 3 lone pairs (6 electrons) + 2 in each bond 8 P atom has 5 bond pairs with 2 electrons each 10 electrons !

55

F P

56

TUTORIAL 1

1. What is the relationship between the possible angular momentum quantum numbers to the principal quantum number? 2. How many atomic orbitals are there in a shell of principal quantum number n? 3. 3 Draw sketches to represent the following for 3s 3p and 3d orbitals 3s, orbitals. a) the radial wave function b) the radial distribution ) c) the angular wave function 4. Penetration and shielding are terms used when discussing atomic orbitals a) Explain what the terms penetration and shielding mean. b) How do these concepts help to explain the structure of the periodic table 5. Sketch the d orbitals as enclosed surfaces, showing the signs of the wavefunction. 6. What does the sign of a wavefuntion mean ?

57

Prof G. W. Watson f Lloyd Institute 2.05 watsong@tcd.ie g@

Last lecture

d orbitals Radial wavefunctions, nodes and angular wavefunctions (shapes) f orbitals Radial wavefunctions, nodes and angular wavefunctions (shapes) wavefunctions Multielectron atoms Penetration and shielding Atomic orbital energies, filling and the periodic table Valence bond theory (localised electron pairs forming bonds) Lewis structures number of electron pairs bond order (electrons shares divided by 2) VSEPR repulsion of electron pairs (BP and LP) molecular shape

59

Valence bond theory (Linus Pauling) Based on localised bonding Hybridisation to give a geometry which is consistent with experiment. Hybridisation constructs new hybrid atomic orbitals from the AOs

Use Lewis model (number of electron pairs) E.g. BeH2, Be 1s2 2s2

hybridisation

shape.

H Be

Correctly predicted by VSEPR to be linear can we explain it using AOs Mix S with pz orbital 2 sp hybridized orbitals

60

sp hybridisation

sp hybridisation Mix and a s and a p orbital two combinations s + pz and s pz Two AOs two hybrid AOs Relative sign is important when mixing orbitals sp therefore means that the hybrid orbital is 50% s and 50% p

Lewis structure 3 directions

H H C C

H H

sp = sp =

1 ( 2s + 2 p 2 1 ( 2s 2 p 2

) )

+ +

= 61

sp2 hybridisation

62

Hybridisation bonds

For ethene sp2 hybridisation bonding in three directions

Hybridisation sp3

For tetrahedral molecules we have to mix the s with all the p orbitals (sp3) This give rise 4 equally spaced orbitals e.g. methane

H

x Each local bond can hold 2 electrons z Have not accounted for the second pair of electron shared by the C atoms Creates a bond above and below the plane of the molecule Could think of the C as going from s2 p2 (sp2)3 px1

H C H

sp3 hybridisation tetrahedral

4 electron pairs

H2O can also be thought of like this with two of the l b th ht f lik thi ith t f th 3 orbitals occupied by lone pairs. sp

O H

63

H

sp3 hybridisation tetrahedral

64

4 electron pairs

Hybridisation d orbitals

Trigonal Bipyramidal sp3d 5 electron pairs

(s ( + px + py + pz + dz2) d

Hybridisation summary

Lone pairs equatorial

Hybrid Atomic orbitals isation that are mixed Geometry General formula AB2 AB3 AB4 Examples

dz2+ dx2-y2)

sp3d

sp3d2

s + px + py + pz +

dz2

dx2-y2

octahedral

AB6

SF6 [Ni(CN)4]2[PtCl4]2-

65

66

Molecule orbital theory (Robert Mullikan) Robert Electrons are delocalised Different to Lewis and hybridisation (these are not MO) Molecular orbitals are formed which involve all of the atoms of the molecule Molecular orbital are formed by addition and subtraction of AO s AOs Linear Combination of Atomic Orbitals (LCAO) ( ) like hybrid AOs but the MO involves the whole molecule

H2 molecule interaction of two hydrogen 1s orbitals ( a and b ) In phase interaction (same sign)

In Phase

1s + 1s

1 = ( a + b )

Constructive interference

Animation shows the in phase interaction of the s orbitals as they are brought together

67

68

H2 molecule interaction of two hydrogen 1s orbitas ( a and b )

Out of Phase

In phase interaction - charge density given by 2

1s - 1s

12 = ( a + b )2

12 = [ a ]2 + [ b ]2 + 2[ a b ]

2 = ( a b )

Destructive interference Node between the atoms Animation shows the out of phase interaction (different colours) of the s y g g orbitals as they are brought together

This gives an enhanced density where the AOs overlap between the atoms referred to as positive overlap and pull the atoms together ( bonding) 1 = Out of phase interaction

2 2 = ( a b )2

2 2 = [ a ]2 + [ b ]2 2[ a b ]

This leads to reduced density between the atoms 2 = * referred to as negative overlap and pushes the atoms apart (* anti-bonding)

Interaction of 2 AO

n MOs

69

70

Interference between AO wave functions bonding Constructively bonding interaction Destructively anti-bonding interaction

Hypothetical molecule where the two s orbitals have different energies E ( a ) < E ( b ) What would the MOs be like B di MO will be much more like the low energy orbital a Bonding ill b h lik th l bit l Anti-bonding MO will be much more like high energy orbital b We can say that the bonding MO is

= Ca a + Cb b

Energy level diagram represents this interaction Two s orbitals interaction to create a low energy bonding and high energy anti-bonding molecular orbital Electrons fill the lowest energy orbital (same rules as for filling AOs) Bonding energy = 2 E

Energy

(anti-bonding)

Where the coefficients C, indicate the contribution contrib tion of the AO to the MO E Energy gy H H2 H

71

a

So for

Ca > Cb

(bonding)

AB

B

72

We wrote an equation using coefficients for the contribution of AOs to the bonding MO, we can do the same for the anti-bonding MO

= Ca a + Cb b

LCAO

Generally we can write

* = Ca a Cb b

Ca < Cb

*

n =

No AO 's x = a...

n Cx x

where the coefficients are different are reflect the contribution to each MO

Ca > Cb

*

The sign can be adsorbed into the coefficient and we can write all of the MOs in a general way

n n n = Ca a + Cb b

So

n=1 n=2

1 =

1 Ca a

1 + Cb b

1 Ca

1 0.8, Cb

= 0 .2

2 2 2 = Ca a + Cb b

2 2 Ca = 0.2, Cb = 0.8

The coefficients contains both phase (sign) of the AOs and how big their contribution (size) is to a particular MO

73

And an examination of the coefficients tells us the bonding characteristics of the MOs

74

We have seen how s orbitals interact what about other orbitals If you have positive overlap reversing the sign negative overlap E.g.

s + s and px + px s s and px px

Some orbital can not interact they give rise to zero overlap Positive overlap (constructive interference) on one side in cancelled by negative overlap (destructive interference) on the other s + px positive overlap above the axis is cancelled by negative overlap below Same is true for the other interactions below

+ve -ve ve

Must define orientation and stick to it for all orbitals. Thus pz + pz -ve pz pz +ve i.e. i e for sigma bond between P orbital need opposite sign coefficients !

Negative Overlap g p

Zero overlap

75

76

Last lecture

Hybridisation combining AOs on one atom to hybridisation made consistent with structure y

hybrid orbitals

Prof G. W. Watson Lloyd Institute 2.05 watsong@tcd.ie

Molecular orbital theory (delocalised view of bonding) LCAO all AOs can contribute to a MO n AOs n MOs Filled in same way as AOs Energy Example of H2 H Molecular orbitals for AOs of different energy H2 H

Linear Combination of Atomic Orbitals (LCAO) Use of coefficient to describe (i) phase of interaction and (ii) size of No AO 's contribution of a given AO ib i f i n n = Cx x

x = a...

78

1) Symmetry of bonding = spherical symmetry along the bond axis - same symmetry as s orbital no nodes pass through the bond axis (can be at right angles *)

2) bonding and anti-bonding (already met this label) Nothing if bonding ( nodes between bonded atoms) g g (no )

= one nodal plane which passes through the bond axis

dzx + px

Additional * if a nodal plane exits between the atoms, that is if the p , wavefunction changes sign as you go from one atom to the other.

*

= two nodal plane which pass through the bond axis (end on dxy or d x 2 y 2 )

79 80

3) Is there a centre of inversion ? i.e. is it Centrosymmetric ? The final label indicated whether the MO has a centre of inversion symmetry y y Li-Li

Ne-Ne

Possible interactions between 1s, 2s and 2p As you go from one side of wave function through the centre of the bond the sign of g the wavefunction reverses not centrosymmetric u = ungerade or odd

px + px

px - px

bonding

s s, pz pz

bonding

px px, py - py

81 82

2s and 2p energies sufficiently spaced to give little interaction Simple picture of the MO p p Unpaired l t U i d electrons 6 u 4u Paramagnetic 2p 2g 1u 5g

4

u

Will interactions between s and pz be important Depends on energy difference between s and pz b t d If large then no effect

2p

2g 1u 3g 2u

Label MOs starting from the bottom although often only valence orbitals

How does the energy of the 2s and 2p vary with Z (shielding / penetration) 2p 2s No sp mixing

2s

3 g

2s 1g Energy difference too big to interact with valence orbitals 1s AOs very small very small overlap in lower levels ll l i l l l (small E)

83

sp mixing i i Energy Li Be B C N O F Ne

84

Energy 1s 1 O

2 u

1s 1

1 g

MO diagram for N2

2s and 2p energies sufficiently close for interaction 1 and 2 shift to lower energy gy 3 shifted 4 shifted to high energy 3 now above 1 levels unaffected more complex

Making sense of N2

Take basic model for oxygen no s p interaction Examine how the MOs can interact and can not interact zero overlap level remain the same Examine interactions

4 u

4u 2 2p 2

u

2g 2p 2p 3g 1 u

86

2s

2s

2 u 1 g

85

2s 1u

Making sense of N2

Now examine the anti-bonding interaction (2 and 4) 4u 2u 2p 2 1g 3u 2 2s 1u

87

u

The effect of the overlap between 2s and 2p is greatest for the Li. The MO diagram changes systematically as you go across the periodic table

4*

2* Thus 2u goes down in energy and 4u goes up in energy For bonding with anti-bonding (1 4 or 2 3) the sign changes on one wave function zero overlap.

s p mixing

88

MO treatment of BeH2

VSEPR linear molecule, H Be H Be 1s2 2s2 2p0 H 1s1 Examine interaction of 6 AO with each other 2 H 1s, Be 2s and Be 2px, Be 2py Be 2pz 6 MOs Interaction between H 1s and Be 2s Z

4*u 3*g 2p 2 Non bonding px and py 2s

bonding

anti-bonding i b di

bonding b di

anti-bonding

2u 1g

Be Each of these is delocalised over three atoms and can hold up to two electrons

px and py have zero overlap

BeH2

2H

non bonding

89

Compare these two MOs with no sp mixing with the localised model of two Equivalent bonds formed via sp hybridization

90

Alternative approach

Step wise approach (ligands first) Mix hydrogen 1s orbitals first two Molecular orbitals H Be H Z

4*u

Be 3 3 *g

2p

2s 2u 1g

Be

BeH2

2H

92

91

Last lecture

LCAO I Interaction of AOs with different energy i f AO i h diff contribution Representing contribution as coefficient p g AO interactions that were possible MOs positive, negative and zero overlap labelling of MOs ( / , *, g / u)

Lecture 6 More complex molecules and CO bonding in transition metal complexes Prof G. W. Watson G W Lloyd Institute 2.05 watsong@tcd.ie g@

2nd row homo nuclear diatomics 2s 2p mixing occurs up to N energy different too big after this (O2, F2) p g p gy g ( Difference in MO diagram for N2 and O2 Molecular orbital treatment of BeH2

94

MO treatment of H2O

z H

O H x Three orbitals

MOs of H2O

three MOs anti - bonding

z H

O H x

H2O is not linear but why ? We will examine the MOs for an non linear tri-atomic and find out. What orbitals are involved 2 H 1s + O 2s O 2px O 2py and O 2pz Lets start by creating MO s from the hydrogen 1s orbitals. MOs orbitals

2pz

Taking the in p g phase p first- it will interact with the O 2s and O 2pz (zero overlap pair p ( p with O 2px and O 2py)

approx. 2pz - 2s + H

+

95 96

MOs of H2O

Out of phase H 1s orbitals Only interact with px 2 MOs y Zero overlap with py

z H

O H x

H

O H x

97

Slightly bonding Pz Non bonding Py non b di py bonding Very different to the VB concept of two identical sp3 filled orbital

H H

H2O

2H

H

98

MO theory correct.

Both cases of XA2 same MO different No of electrons Bonding MOs as a function of A-X-A bond angle

MOs of Benzene

bonding is more important for reactivity independent of (zero overlap) six px orbitals combine to form six MOs

Different ways of arranging six px orbitals on a ring Lowest energy all in phase owes e e gy a p ase Degenerate levels (1 nodal plane 2 nodes) Degenerate levels (2 nodal planes 4 nodes) Highest energy all out of phase (3 nodal planes

6 nodes)

CH2 (s) 102o NH2 OH2 103o 105o 90 H2O CH2(T) 180

99

Energy increases with number of nodes as in AOs Also the number of nodes on a ring must be even continuous wavefunction Lowest energy all in phase All coeffcients the same

100

MOs of Benzene

Next occupied degenerate pair 1 nodal plane Two ways of doing this between atoms and through a pair of atoms

MO diagram for CO

Same orbitals as homo nuclear diatomics different energies g rise to significant 2s - 2p mixing g give g p g confusing set of orbitals

4

C-O anti - bonding (more C) (uneven more carbon) Primarily carbon (pz) bond (uneven more oxygen) Primarily oxygen (pz)

2p As the wavefunction goes through 0 (at the node) the smooth wavefunction has smaller coefficients next to the node zero at the node 2 electron per MO spread over 6 atoms Compare with Lewis structure with individual double bonds With local bonding have to resort to resonance structures to explain benzene 2p

2 3 1

2

2s 2s

1

101

102

For chemical reaction the HOMO (Highest Occupied Molecular Orbital) and the LUMO (Lowest unoccupied Molecular Orbital) are the most important. HOMO 3 low l energy Oxygen orbitals bi l makes 2 mainly O pz in 3 mainly C pz Some anti-bonding mixes in

due to sp mixing

Three sets of interaction based on symmetry of ligand AOs Generally applicable to bonding TM ligands y pp g g a1g all ligand AOs in phase Interaction with s orbital

LUMO 2* Comes f from standard i d d interaction i however lower oxygen orbital means has has more oxygen and * more carbon

t1u ligands in one axis contribute With opposite phase one nodal plane Interaction with p orbitals 3

3 C O

O

103 104

eg ligand phases have two nodal planes Interact with d z 2 d x 2 y 2 2

t*1u a*1g

Electrons from filled orbitals on the ligands fill all the bonding orbitals

e*g

d electrons fill t2g (non bonding) and e*g (antibonding) Example is d6 e.g. Co3+ These are the orbitals considered in ligand filed theory. Note the e*g 6 ligand is anti-bonding ! orbitals What really decided oct is the interaction

106

oct

t2g

eg

t1u

a1g

105

Orbitals with character can interact with the t2g d orbitals Must be correct symmetry (t2g) 3 arrangements possible using dxy, dyx, dxz Two extreme situations Ligand orbitals are low energy and filled (e.g. F) Ligand orbitals are high energy and empty (e.g. CO) (e g

Interaction with high energy empty ligand orbitals Interaction with low l energy filled ligand orbitals

Li d orbitals are low energy and filled (e.g. F) Ligand bi l l d fill d ( Filled orbitals interact in a fashion Bonding combinations are reduced in energy and filled (like ligand orbitals) g gy ( g ) Antibonding combination are raised in energy and filled (like d orbitals)

e*g e*g

oct

t2g

oct

t*2g t2g

e*g

oct t

t2g

?

107

without

with

ligand

Strong interaction with filled orbitals with interaction leads to reduction in oct (box shows the orbitals considered in ligand field theory)

108

Ligand orbitals are high energy and empty (e.g. CO 2*) Filled orbitals interact in a fashion B di combinations are reduced in energy (like d orbitals) Bonding bi ti d di (lik bit l ) Antibonding combination are raised in energy and empty (like ligand orbitals)

e*g e*g

Tutorial 2 part a

1. Explain the MO approach for the interaction of a) two s orbitals of identical energy ) gy b) two s orbitals of slightly different energy c) two s orbital of very different energy. Consider the bonding in the molecule O2 a) Draw a Lewis structure for O2 b) Determine the hybridization c) Perform an MO treatment of O2 ) (i) What orbitals are involved? (ii) what interactions are possible? (iii) what do the resulting MOs look like? (iv) sketch an MO energy level diagram. d) What difference are there in the details of the bonding diagram between the Lewis and MO treatments

110

2.

oct

t2g

oct

t2g

without

with

ligand

St Strong interaction with empty orbitals with i t i t ti ith t bit l ith interaction leads to increase ti l d t i in oct (box shows the orbitals considered in ligand field theory)

109

Tutorial 2 part b

3. Consider the molecule BeH2 a) Draw a Lewis structure b) Determine the hybridization c) Perform an MO treatment of O2 (i) What orbitals are involved. involved (ii) Generate appropriate ligand MOs and interactions with the central atom (iii)what do h (iii) h d the resulting MOs look like? l i MO l k lik ? (iv)sketch an MO energy level diagram. ) g g d) What difference are there in the details of the bonding diagram between the Lewis and MO treatments 4. 4 Perform the same analysis for BeH2, HF BH3, and CH4 HF, 5. Use molecular orbital theory to explan a) The splitting of the d orbitals by sigma interactions with ligands b) The effect of interaction on the ligand field strength.

111 112

THE END

- ch1oddUploaded byByron Monterroza
- A01_lec_16_1300_handoutUploaded byrob
- Chemical Bonding NotesUploaded bySagar Naik
- d_11-05Uploaded byyassermax191919
- GoodUploaded byKalpana Murthy
- Basic UV-Vis Theory, Concepts and ApplicationsUploaded byBroderick Mike
- 12.4.2012Uploaded byrskr_t
- 1Uploaded byvijaykumarlamba
- Chap1b MotUploaded byEustance Juan
- MO_theory_stuff.pdfUploaded bybits_who_am_i
- Aieee 2007 ChemUploaded byKainshk Gupta
- oledUploaded byBakiesaliya
- 金属有机化学课件.pdfUploaded byming
- Screening Percentages Based on Slater Effective Nuclear Charge as a Versatile Tool for Teaching Periodic TrendsUploaded byRBuzolin
- lec-30Uploaded byvj.krlamba
- coordination chemistryUploaded bycharlesluke
- ic010880yUploaded byFlorin Andrei
- 7.THESUPERSYMMETRYAPPROACHES....J.Sadegietal.Uploaded byyvella annastasia
- supervisionevaluationUploaded byapi-352538610
- Atomic StructureUploaded byYash Akhauri
- EssentialsOfPhysicalChemistry_DonShillady.pdfUploaded byKasi Spartacvs Albatroz
- 2014 Tests and Keys.pdfUploaded byshaturocks123
- J03Uploaded byrappycat
- 3_Detailed Syllabus 2010Uploaded byHktrniaskhan Issa
- Chemistry Study Material - Combined Organic ChemistryUploaded byaglasem
- A_Peek_Behind_the_Veil_of_Maya.pdfUploaded byIgnacioPérezBurgaré

- Chem281- Chapter 3: Covalent Bonding Bonding TheoriesUploaded byNuansak3
- Reactions of Metal ComplexesUploaded byNuansak3
- A. Rouzee et al- Field-free molecular alignment of asymmetric top molecules using elliptically polarized laser pulsesUploaded byNuansak3
- M.F. Gelin, V.A. Tolkachev and A.P. Blokhin- Semiclassical description of purely rotational recurrences for collisionless asymmetric top molecules: new resultsUploaded byNuansak3
- Carlos A. Arango and Gregory S. Ezra- Classic Mechanics of Dipolar Asymmetric Top Molecules in Collinear Static Electric and Nonresonant Linearly Polarized Laser Fields: Energy-Momentum Diagrams, Bifurcations and Accessible Configuration SpaceUploaded byNuansak3
- Christian Buth and Robin Santra- Rotational molecular dynamics of laser-manipulated bromotrifluoromethane studied by x-ray absorptionUploaded byNuansak3
- A. Rouzee et al- Field-free one-dimensional alignment of ethylene moleculeUploaded byNuansak3
- Stefan Pabst and Robin Santra- Alignment of asymmetric-top molecules using multiple-pulse trainsUploaded byNuansak3
- Kevin F. Lee et al- Field-Free Three-Dimensional Alignment of Polyatomic MoleculesUploaded byNuansak3
- S. De et al- Field-Free Orientation of CO Molecules by Femtosecond Two-Color Laser FieldsUploaded byNuansak3
- Christian Buth and Robin Santra- X-ray refractive index of laser-dressed atomsUploaded byNuansak3
- Emily R. Peterson et al- An x-ray probe of laser-aligned moleculesUploaded byNuansak3
- Masoud Motamedi- Rotational Spectra of Symmetric Top Molecules in Ground and Different Vibrational Excited States, and Phenomenon of Resonance – Applying in CF3CCHUploaded byNuansak3
- Christian Buth and Robin Santra- Theory of x-ray absorption by laser-aligned symmetric-top moleculesUploaded byNuansak3
- P. J. Ho et al- Molecular structure determination from x-ray scattering patterns of laser-aligned symmetric-top moleculesUploaded byNuansak3
- Harry B. Gray and C. J. Ballhusa- Molecular Orbital Theory for Square Planar Metal ComplexesUploaded byNuansak3
- Ang Yi Hui, Liu Wing Chung and Daniel Lo- Molecular Orbital TheoryUploaded byNuansak3
- Ian D. Hands, Janette L. Dunn and Colin A. Bates- Calculation of images of oriented C60 molecules using molecular orbital theoryUploaded byNuansak3
- Introduction to Qualitative Molecular Orbital TheoryUploaded byNuansak3
- Molecular Orbital TheoryUploaded byNuansak3
- Chem 6320- Molecular Orbital TheoryUploaded byNuansak3
- Hückel Molecular Orbital TheoryUploaded byNuansak3
- Chem 112- Molecular Orbital Theory Supplemental ProblemsUploaded byNuansak3
- Molecular Shapes, Symmetry and Molecular Orbital TheoryUploaded byNuansak3
- Bruce E. Bursten- Some comments on approximate LCAO molecular orbital theory in organometallic chemistry: Getting more by doing less?Uploaded byNuansak3
- Arvi Rauk- Simple Huckel Molecular Orbital TheoryUploaded byNuansak3
- L. J. Smith- Molecular Shapes, Symmetry and Molecular Orbital TheoryUploaded byNuansak3
- An Introduction to Molecular Orbital TheoryUploaded byNuansak3
- Chem 59-250: Molecular Orbital TheoryUploaded byNuansak3
- Mo Theory and BondingUploaded byDargorleth

- early stage 1 geography uowUploaded byapi-295094327
- Lessons in AdvaitaUploaded byDr Srinivasan Nenmeli -K
- 1-s2.0-S0301679X11000752-main(1)Uploaded byanandr50
- A Happy State of MindUploaded bynarayan k
- unescoUploaded byPreethi Iyengar
- Pedwayfinding Bruce HerbesUploaded bydougdago
- Teen/20s Male MonologuesUploaded byDanielDennert
- 1-s2.0-S0040162517310727-mainUploaded byAnonymous 5uoWGr1E4e
- Ascent of Mount CarmelUploaded bykarlmgrant
- 01 HistoryUploaded bygahan
- A Level Practical Performance Calculator AR-changes-Sept 2016Uploaded byBev Bev
- 88211 marcos v manglapus.pdfUploaded byPhilip Christian Galiza
- Different Roles of Product Appearance in Consumer ChoiceUploaded byMaunish Thakkar
- 00 Inner Energy Guide 1Uploaded bySahaja Meditation
- DN Dhanagare - IPD 18 PaperUploaded bySudarshan Punna
- Flip - Flop JK Master Slave reportUploaded bysuv_fame
- ra generic rubricUploaded byapi-311549846
- Final SynopsisAMITYUploaded byVaneet Kumar
- 02_Intro_To_Probability.pptxUploaded byAsrul Nurdin Ali
- justice ginsburgs resignationUploaded byapi-133760119
- European Identity: construct, fact and fictionUploaded byJavier Zoro
- Test1Uploaded byPriyanka
- Emerald TabletUploaded byMarc Abba
- The Problem of Usul Al ShashiUploaded byAbul Hasan
- Aesthetics of JapanUploaded byVaibhav Mishra
- Sens Passion, Mysticism And Misogyny in PhiloUploaded byJuan José Fuentes Ubilla
- art_5Uploaded bycpaz2011
- Carrer and Succession PlaningUploaded bySanjit Patel
- Principles of Mine Haul Road Design and Construction v5 Sep 2015 RJTs.28192929Uploaded byMarc Flu
- 1689 London Baptist Confession of FaithUploaded byKevin Matthews