Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Evaluation Criteria
Content Organization and coherence Materials
1. Intellectual curiosity
The Department will continue doing what has done so far; there is no need to take actions at this time.
The student will have intellectual curiosity and capacity for independent study
The Department will continue doing what has done so far; there is no need to take actions at this time.
3. Social Responsibility
The student will display an ethical conduct in the course of their studies and their profession, as well as attitudes that honor and enhance the profession.
Activity: Questionnaire on ethics at the beginning of the course (CCOM 3981) Instrument: Questions in questionnaire
The Department will continue doing what has done so far; there is no need to take actions at this time.
Activity: Group discussion with open ended questions (CCOM 3981) Instrument: Notes on students opinions
The Department will continue doing what has done so far; Expected outcomes: Less than 50% of the students will there is no need to take actions at this time. have a positive attitude towards ethics Findings: Most of the students (more than 50%) showed a good attitude towards social responsibility and academic honesty. However, it was not clear for them what constitute plagiarism. We expected less than 50% of the students to be
Evaluation Criteria
The student will display an ethical conduct in the course of their studies and their profession, as well as attitudes that honor and enhance the profession.
Activity: Questionnaire on ethics at the end of the course prepared by the College of General Studies (CCOM 3981) Instrument: Questions in questionnaire Activity: Questionnaire on ethics at the beginning of the course (CCOM 3981) Instrument: Questions in questionnaire
Expected outcomes: At least 70% of the students will have A new instrument will be designed and the domain will be measured again in Fall 2012. a positive attitude towards ethics Findings: We considered that the questionnaire prepared by the College of General Studies was not appropriated to compare the results obtained as baseline data and it was not given to the students. Expected outcomes: Less than 50% of the students will have a positive attitude towards ethics Findings: 55% (11/20) of the students that answered the questionnaire on CCOM 3981, Sect. 001, were competent as defined in the rubric. We expected less than 50% of the students to be competent. This was baseline data to be compared with the outcome at the end of the semester. The Department will continue doing what has done so far; there is no need to take actions at this time.
Activity: Group discussion with open ended questions (CCOM 3981) Instrument: Notes on students opinions
Expected outcomes: Less than 50% of the students will The Department will continue doing what has done so far; have a positive attitude towards ethics there is no need to take actions at this time. Findings: Most of the students (more than 50%) showed a good attitude towards social responsibility and academic honesty. However, it was not clear for them what constitute plagiarism. We expected less than 50% of the students to be competent. This was baseline data to be compared with the outcome at the end of the semester. Expected outcomes: At least 70% of the students will have A new instrument will be designed and the domain will be a positive attitude towards ethics measured again in Fall 2012. Findings: We considered that the questionnaire is not appropriated to compare the results obtained as baseline data and it was not given to the students.
Activity: Questionnaire on ethics at the end of the course prepared by the College of General Studies (CCOM 3981) Instrument: Questions in questionnaire
II. Summary of Assessment carried out: In an additional sheet of paper, briefly describe the assessment activities undertaken, the assessment instruments used, how the instruments were developed, and how was the information collected analyzed. Please include the assessment instruments used. Discuss how the proposed transforming actions will be assessed. Assessment Coordinator: _Ivelisse Rubio____________________ Department Chair: ___ Ivelisse Rubio ______________ Date submitted: ___Feb 3, 2012_________
Appendices: Include the final version of Part I and II of the Plan of Assessment of Student Learning. If you have developed a table or a graph illustrating the results of the assessment findings, please include it. UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO RO PIEDRAS CAMPUS PARCIAL REPORT OF ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING PART II - KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS, OR ATITUDES OF THE ACADEMIC PROGRAM OR MAJOR Academic Program or Major: ____ Bachelors in Computer Science___________________________
Knowledge, Skills or Attitudes of the Academic Program or Major Activities and instruments used to collect information (direct or indirect measures) Academic Year: 2011-2012, First Semester
Evaluation Criteria
II. Summary of Assessment carried out: In an additional sheet of paper, briefly describe the assessment activities undertaken, the assessment instruments used, how the instruments were developed, and how was the information collected analyzed. Please include the assessment instruments used. Discuss how the proposed transforming actions will be assessed. Appendices: Include the final version of Part I and II of the Plan of Assessment of Student Learning. If you have developed a table illustrating the results of the assessment findings, please include it.