Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Strategic Overview Examples of US Agency use of the London and EU Banking Markets for Wealth Creation, without Congressional Oversight or Supervision. CREATED AND DISTRIBUTED 20/2/2012
The purpose of this overview is to highlight the scale and depth of use of EU Markets by US Agencies and Political entities, bypassing Congress, avoiding or evading Taxes. They are exposed breaching contractual agreements with trusting Principal Funders, then Laundering profits or proceeds earned though a labyrinth of Trusts, Foundations and Fiduciary fronts. Governments simply do not understand the latitude Banks apply to cross trade in Off Balance sheet, Grey Screen or Black Screen trading. Ponzi money is accrued in vast amounts, all bypassing Revenue collection, and all spent. Derivatives issued and cross traded now exceed in excess of $600 Trillion dollars with no possible Insurer of last resort. Warren Buffet has declared them to be the ultimate Financial Weapon of mass destruction. Neither Governments, nor Banking regulators, understand any of it to an adequate level to contain and eliminate the risks. The loss to each Sovereign nations Revenue Commissioners, including HMG, is considerable. The lack of oversight risks the perpetration of sophisticated crimes, as has been evidenced already. Just a few cases will be exampled. The cases merit a thorough review to determine thereafter the real extent and scale of the problems. The lack of US Congressional oversight allows identified US Agencies to fund secret Black Operations activities, with all the leading ethical, moral or criminal implications hidden. Major funds are being accrued in London without transparency or withholding taxes visible as settled, or even intent to do so as demonstrated by the total circumvention of Revenue declarations. The scale of UK and EU Revenue avoidance witnessed to date is extensive. As is the identified level of personal wealth generated by certain identified by complicit US Political entities, operating in complicity with Lead EU Bankers of notoriety. The scale of Capital recovery once investigated can accrue a very substantial contribution for our own Exchequers account. One classic case alone, the Edward Falcone Trading Programs orchestrated by Josef Ackermann of Deutsch Bank, can recover so much tax visibly evaded, as would resolve our total Defence over run budgets. In addition to exposing Agency linked parties being operated inside UK jurisdiction enabling our own Intelligence Agencies to monitor use of funds and transgressions. The reputation and integrity of the London Capital Markets necessitates protection and close supervision. The cases identified as examples alone, will allow skilled and competent investigating analysts to follow the money trail and recover substantial capital as Proceeds of Crime or Tax Evasion. There are sensitive Political connotations, but history is littered with exposed cases and hindsight regret, all perfectly avoidable. Significant transgressions are evidenced within our Capital Markets, with high risk connotations for the UK if not examined and sanitised. Mr Falcone has offered to provide access to all his files and to fully cooperate with any UK and EU investigating officers. Media exposure is a constant risk. Our own Agencies need to understand the extent of financial market penetration. Especially so having identified now named account holders at Banks such as Barclays, who then route funds onwards to the CIA, or Bush /Romney etc as has happened with the Falcone trading profits. The extent of cross market penetration by US Agencies and certain compromised Bankers such as Josef Ackermann of Deutsch Bank merits independent investigation. Especially so his network of Page 1 of 4
$15 Trillion has been created, supported by a clearly false, non-existent asset by an FRB NY Cabal operation for the cross benefit of a US Agency. Where are those funds now? Once receiving terminals are scrutinised they can be traced. Who holds title to false money now raised? Who is now Debt obligated for redemption? Is RBS, a British part owned bank? McCall has made a number of allegations which at least merit independent Professional investigation. He has alluded to previous senior Governmental entities having known and accommodated UK participation. The Beneficiaries of those funds need to be identified, as also their use? Cross combining similar aspects of the use and control of the Falcone program accounts within the UK and EU Banking systems, and the extensive labyrinth of Offshore Bank accounts used to evade taxes, co combined with the sheer scale of transfers for CIA benefit, raises numerous probity issues. There are many Blogging sites tracking and releasing allegations. Mainstream Media exposure at some stage may be inevitable with potential Global consequences. The perceived integrity of the London Capital Markets is only part of the risk equation we face. $15 Trillion dollars have been raised by an identifiable fraud. Their whereabouts are currently unknown. As is their current use, who is benefitting and to what use are they being applied with no Congressional oversight or supervision? What is our Duty of Care obligation to inform Congress? What is the scale of US Agency penetration and use of our UK and EU capital markets? If the Falcone issue alone can allow us sufficient Capital recovery to underpin our own Defence Budgets shortfalls, is this worth pursuing? Falcones investigators have identified well in excess of Page 3 of 4
Page 4 of 4