Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
(
(
(
(
=
(
(
(
*
*
*
*
*
2
3
2
3
0
0 0
2
3
c
b
a
v
v
v
v
v
|
o
Fig.26: Principle of biasing inverter PWM strategy
Asian Power Electronics Journal, Vol. 1, No. 1, Aug 2007
103
2. The sub-hexagonal center situated nearest to the tip
of the reference vector OT is then determined.
3. The coordinates of the nearest sub-hexagonal center
in the
o
v -
|
v plane (the point A in this example,
Fig.26), denoted as
nshc
v
, o
and
nshc
v
, |
are known for
all the six sub-hexagonal centers. For example, the
coordinates of the point A in the
o
v -
|
v plane are
given by (Vdc/2,0).
4. Since the vector OA is output by the biasing inverter,
the coordinates of the switching vector (AT in the
present case) denoted as
sw
V
, o
and
sw
V
, |
are given by:
sw
V
, o
=
*
o
v -
nshc
v
, o
and
sw
V
, |
=
*
|
v -
nshc
v
, |
5. The modified reference phase voltages
a
v ,
b
v and
c
v for the switching inverter are then obtained by
transforming
sw
V
, o
,
sw
V
, |
into the corresponding three
phase variables by using the classical two phase
three phase transformation given by:
(
(
(
(
(
=
(
(
(
sw
sw
c
b
a
V
V
v
v
v
,
,
3 / 1 3 / 1
3 / 1 3 / 1
0 3 / 2
|
o
6. If inverter-2 is employed as the biasing inverter, the
modified references are used directly to generate the
switching vector AT with inverter-1. On the other
hand, if inverter-1 is used as the biasing inverter, it is
obvious that the modified references must be
negated to generate the switching vector AT with
inverter-2.
The principal advantage with this PWM strategy is that the
inverter switching is significantly reduced as one inverter
switches only six times, while the other switches for 48
times. With decoupled control both inverters are switched
in all the 48 samples.
It is important to note that the most important part of this
algorithm is to find the nearest sub-hexagonal center to the
tip of the reference vector OT (Fig.26). Fig.27 and Fig.28
explain the method to determine the same. In the
discussion to follow, the symbol u denotes the angle
subtended by the tip of the reference voltage space vector
with respect to an instant where the instantaneous value of
the A-phase reference voltage is zero. Fig.27 shows
various values of u corresponding to the positive and the
negative zero crossings of the reference phase voltages in
the
o
V -
|
V plane. From Fig.27, it may be noted that if 0 s
u s 60, the tip of
sr
V is situated in the quadrangle OSRQ.
It may also be seen that F is the nearest sub-hexagonal
center for this condition. Should the tip of the reference
vector be situated within the quadrangle OSGH, A is the
nearest sub-hexagonal center to it. Similar observations
may be made for the rest of the sub-hexagonal centers. It
is desirable to identify the nearest sub-hexagonal center
directly from the instantaneous phase references without
having to evaluate
sr
V and there by the value of u, as it
would be very time consuming.
The instantaneous phase reference voltages
*
a
v ,
*
b
v and
*
c
v (solid lines) normalized w.r.t
sr
V and their respective
negations (dotted lines) are shown in Fig.28. From Fig.28
it may be noted that
*
a
v is the most positive quantity
amongst these six quantities when 60 s u s 120 and A
is the nearest sub-hexagonal center as recognized by
Fig.27. Similarly
*
a
v is the most positive quantity
amongst these six when 240 s u s 300 and D is the
nearest sub-hexagonal center. Figure 27 also reinforces
this fact. Thus, it is clear that by finding the maximum
value amongst these six quantities, one can determine the
nearest sub-hexagonal center.
Fig.27: Zero crossing of the instantaneous phase voltages
corresponding to the reference voltage space vector
Fig.28: Recognition of the nearest sub-hexagonal center with
instantaneous reference quantities
VI. EXPERIMENTAL VERIFICATION FOR BIASING INVERTER
PWM STRATEGY:
The top traces of Fig.29 show the gating signals of the top
devices of the A-phase legs of the individual inverters for
mi = 0.4. In this case, the samples of the reference vector
always lie within the core hexagon ABCDEF. The bottom
trace of the same figure shows the difference of the two
pole voltages. Figures 30 and 31 show the respective pole
voltages (both simulated & experimental results) of the
S.Srinivas et al: Switching Algorithms for the Dual Inverter fed ...
104
individual inverters with this PWM strategy. From these
two figures, it is evident that the switching of inverter-1 is
drastically reduced as it is made to operate as the biasing
inverter for all samples in a cycle. However, the switching
of inverter-2 remains unaltered as it is used as the
switching inverter for all the samples in a cycle. Figure 32
shows the difference of the pole voltages, while Fig.33
shows the actual motor phase voltage (obtained after the
subtraction of the zero-sequence voltage from the
waveform shown in Fig.34). In this case, the phase voltage
waveform is similar to the one obtained by a conventional
two-level inverter. However, the switching ripple with the
open-end winding configuration is much lesser compared
to the one obtained with a two-level inverter. This is
because; the space vector l9 locations situated at the
closest proximity are switched with open-end winding
drive. Specifically, if the sample is situated in sector-1, the
vertices O, A and B are switched, unlike in a two-
level inverter, where the location O, G and I are
switched to construct the same sample (Fig.3). Fig.34
shows the simulated and experimentally obtained results
of the zero-sequence voltage. Figures 35 and 36
respectively show the harmonic spectra of the difference in
pole voltages (shown in Fig.32) and the actual motor
phase voltage (shown in Fig.34). Figure 37 shows the
experimentally obtained motor phase current at no-load for
the same m
i
of 0.4.
The corresponding waveforms for a modulation index of
m
i
=0.7 are shown through Fig.38 to Fig.45. In this case,
the tip of the reference vector traverses through the outer
sectors i.e. 7 to 24. It is also evident that the phase voltage
waveform is similar to the one obtained in a 3-level
inverter, as the nearest vertices are switched to synthesize
the sample.
With this PWM strategy, the space vector combinations-
11, 22, 33, 44, 55 and 66 are exclusively employed,
whenever the location O is switched. It is worth noting
that with this PWM strategy, the location O is employed
as an active location while the sub-hexagonal centers
constitute the null locations as switching is performed
around them. From table-2, it may be observed that these
combinations result in a zero-sequence voltage that is zero.
In contrast, the PWM strategy proposed in [6] employs the
location O as a null location. Whenever the location O
is switched with this PWM strategy [6], the combinations
87 and 78 are used. From table-2, it may be noted that
these two combinations result in maximum zero-sequence
voltages, particularly for low modulation indices wherein
the dwell time associated with the null vector location
O is more. Thus, a significant reduction in the zero-
sequence voltage in the difference of pole voltages is
possible with the PWM strategy proposed in this paper.
For a modulation of 40%, the zero-sequence voltage
resulting with the strategy adopted in [6] is about 1.4 p.u.,
while with the biasing inverter strategy it is 0.4 p.u. for the
same modulation depth. The normalized harmonics spectra
of the difference of a-phase pole voltages of the two
inverters with the PWM scheme adopted in the earlier
work reported [6], and using the two PWM schemes
proposed in this paper i.e. Decoupled PWM scheme and
Biasing Inverter PWM scheme for different modulation
indices are shown in Fig.46.
Fig.29: Gating signals and the difference of pole-voltages
derived as the difference of two gate signals of top switch of the
a-phase legs of the two inverters for m
i
= 0.4
Fig.30: Simulated (top) & experimentally obtained result (bottom)
of Pole voltage of inverter-1 for m
i
= 0.4
Asian Power Electronics Journal, Vol. 1, No. 1, Aug 2007
105
Fig.31: Simulated (top) & experimentally obtained result (bottom)
of Pole voltage of inverter-2 for m
i
= 0.4
Fig.32: The difference of pole voltages of individual inverters for
m
i
= 0.4
Fig.33: Simulated (top) & experimentally obtained result (bottom)
of the actual motor phase voltage for m
i
= 0.4
Fig.34: Simulated (top) & experimentally obtained result (bottom)
of the common-mode voltage for m
i
= 0.4
Fig. 35: Normalized harmonic spectrum of the difference of the
pole voltages for m
i
= 0.4
Fig. 36: Normalized harmonic spectrum of the
motor phase voltage for m
i
= 0.4
S.Srinivas et al: Switching Algorithms for the Dual Inverter fed ...
106
Fig.37: Experimentally obtained motor phase current at no-load
for m
i
= 0.4
Fig.38: Gating signals and the difference of pole-voltages
derived as the difference of two gate signals of top switch of the
a-phase legs of the two inverters for m
i
= 0.7
Fig.39: Simulated (top) & experimentally obtained result (bottom)
of Pole voltage of inverter-1 for m
i
= 0.7
Fig.40: Simulated (top) & experimentally obtained result (bottom)
of Pole voltage of inverter-2 for m
i
= 0.7
Fig.41: The difference of pole voltages of individual inverters for
m
i
= 0.7
Asian Power Electronics Journal, Vol. 1, No. 1, Aug 2007
107
Fig.42: Simulated (top) & experimentally obtained result (bottom)
of the common-mode voltage for m
i
= 0.7
Fig.43: Simulated (top) & experimentally obtained result (bottom)
of the actual motor phase voltage for m
i
= 0.7
Fig. 44: Normalized harmonic spectrum of the difference of the
pole voltages for m
i
= 0.7
Fig. 45: Normalized harmonic spectrum of the motor phase
voltage for m
i
= 0.7
VII. CONCLUSIONS
Comparing the resultant motor phase voltages with the
two PWM strategies proposed in this paper, (Fig.23 and
Fig.43) it is clear that it is possible to synthesize a
conventional three-level inverter waveform with the
biasing inverter PWM strategy. With the biasing inverter
PWM strategy the reference space vector is reproduced in
the average sense by switching amongst the vector
combinations available at the nearest three vertices.
Consequently the switching ripple with this strategy is
lesser than the decoupled PWM strategy. From the
harmonic spectra of the resultant motor phase voltage with
these two strategies (Fig.17 and Fig.29), it is seen that the
distribution of harmonic energy is better with the biasing
inverter PWM strategy. However, as pointed out earlier,
the principal advantage with the decoupled PWM
algorithm is its fastness and its amenability of
implementation with slower controllers. It is interesting to
note that the PWM strategies proposed in this paper result
in a significant reduction in the zero-sequence voltage in
the difference of pole-voltages compared to the look-up
table approach proposed in [6] at lower indices of
modulation, which could be desirable. Both strategies
obviate the time consuming process of sector identification
and the coordinate transformations. Look-up tables are not
needed with the proposed PWM strategies, reducing the
memory requirements of the controller.
REFERENCES
[1] Akira Nabae, Isao Takahashi and Hirofumi Akagi, A New
Neutral-Point Clamped PWM Inverter, IEEE Trans. Ind.
Appl., Vol. IA-17, No. 5, September-October 1981, pp.
518-523.
[2] T.A. Meynard and H Foch, Multi-Level Conversion: High
Voltage Choppers and Voltage Source Inverters, Conf.
Proc. IEEE PESC 1992, pp. 397-403.
[3] Leon M. Tolbert, Fang Zheng Peng and Thomas G. Habetler,
Multilevel Converters for Large Electric Drives, IEEE
Trans. Ind. Appl., Vol. 35, No. 1, January-February 1999,
pp. 36-44.
[4] H. Stemmler, P. Guggenbach, Configurations of High-
Power Voltage Source Inverter Drives, Proceedings EPE
Conference, 1993, pp. 7-14.
[5] Joohn-Sheok Kim, Seung-Ki Sul, A Novel Voltage
Modulation Technique of the Space Vector PWM,
Conference Proceedings IPEC-1995, pp. 742-747.
S.Srinivas et al: Switching Algorithms for the Dual Inverter fed ...
108
0 10 20 30 40 50
0
1
2
3
4
5
Harmonic number
0 10 20 30 40 50
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
Harmonic number
0 10 20 30 40 50
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
Harmonic number
0 10 20 30 40 50
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
Harmonic number
m
i
=0.1
m
i
=0.2
m
i
=0.3
m
i
=0.4
0 10 20 30 40 50
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
Harmonic order
N
orm
alised H
arm
onic spectrum
of V
ao
m
i
=0.1
0 10 20 30 40 50
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
Harmonic order
N
orm
alised H
arm
onic spectrum
of V
ao
m
i
=0.2
0 10 20 30 40 50
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
Harmonic order
N
orm
alised H
arm
onic spectrum
of V
ao
m
i
=0.4
0 10 20 30 40 50
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
Harmonic order
N
orm
alised H
arm
onic spectrum
of V
ao
m
i
=0.3
0 10 20 30 40 50
0
0.5
1
1.5
Harmonic order
N
orm
alised H
arm
onic spectrum
of vao-vado
m
i
=0.1
0 10 20 30 40 50
0
0.5
1
1.5
Harmonic order
N
orm
alised H
arm
onic spectrum
of vao-vado
m
i
=0.3
0 10 20 30 40 50
0
0.5
1
1.5
Harmonic order
N
orm
alised H
arm
onic spectrum
of vao-vado
m
i
=0.4
0 10 20 30 40 50
0
0.5
1
1.5
Harmonic order
N
orm
alised H
arm
onic spectrum
of vao-vado
m
i
=0.2
(a) (b)
(c)
[6] E.G. Shivakumar, K. Gopakumar, S.K. Sinha, Andre Pittet,
V.T. Ranganathan, Space Vector Control of Dual Inverter
Fed Open-End Winding Induction Motor Drive, EPE
Journal, Vol. 12, No. 1, February 2002, pp. 9-18.
[7] V.T. Somasekhar, K. Gopakumar, Three-Level Inverter
Configuration Cascading Two Two-Level Inverters, IEEE
Proc. Electr. Power Appl., Vol. 150, No. 3, May 2003, pp.
245-254.
[8] V.T. Somasekhar, K. Gopakumar, A. Pittet and V.T.
Ranganathan, PWM Inverter Switching Strategy for a Dual
Two-Level Inverter Fed Open End Winding Induction
Motor Drive with a Switched Neutral, IEE Proc. Of Electr.
Power Appl., Vol. 149, No, 2, March 2002, pp. 152-160.
[9] V.T. Somasekhar, K. Gopakumar, M.R. Baiju, K.K.
Mohapatra and L. Umanand, A Multilevel Inverter System
for an Open End Winding Induction Motor with Open-End
Windings, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics,
Vol. 52, No. 3, June 2005, pp. 824-836.
[10] V.T. Somasekhar, K. Gopakumar, E.G. Shivakumar, S.K.
Sinha, A Space Vector Modulation Scheme for Dual Two
Level Inverter Fed an Open-End Winding Induction Motor
Drive for the Elimination of Zero Sequence Current, EPE
Journal, Vol. 12, No. 2, May 2002, pp. 26-36.
[11] V.T. Somasekhar, M.R. Baiju and K. Gopakumar, Dual
Two Level Inverter Scheme for an Open-End Winding
Induction Motor Drive with a Single DC Power Supply and
Improved DC Bus Utilization, IEE Proc. of Electr. Power.
Appl., Vol. 151, No. 2, March 2004, pp. 230-238.
[12] M. B. Baiju, K.K. Mohapatra, R.S. Kanchan and K.
Gopakumar, A Dual Two-Level Inverter Scheme with
Common Mode Voltage Elimination for an Induction Motor
Drive, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics. Vol. 19,
No. 3, May 2004, pp. 794-805.
[13] V. Oleschuk, B.K. Bose, A.M. Stankovic, Phase-Shift-
Based Synchronous Modulation of Dual-Inverters for an
Open-End Winding Induction Motor Drive with Elimination
of Zero Sequence Currents, Conf. Proc. IEEE-PEDS-2005,
pp. 325-330.
[14] V. Oleschuk, F. Profumo, A. Tenconi and R. Bojoi,
Synchronized Pulse_Width Modulation for Control of
Inverter-Fed Open-End Winding Motor Drives, EPE Conf.
Proc., Pelincec, 2005, Paper-ID: 94.
APPENDIX
The imaginary switching times [5] for inverter-1 and
inverter-2 are related to the respective phase reference
voltages as follows:
*
) ( 2
a
V
T
as
v T
dc
s
=
(1)
*
) ( 2
b
V
T
bs
v T
dc
s
=
(2)
*
) ( 2
c
V
T
cs
v T
dc
s
=
(3)
* '
) ( 2
a
V
T
ga
v T
dc
s
=
(4)
* '
) ( 2
c
V
T
gb
v T
dc
s
=
(5)
* '
) ( 2
c
V
T
gc
v T
dc
s
=
(6)
When the reference vector is situated in sector-1,
For Inverter-1:
as
T T =
max
CS
T T =
min
As
] 5 [
min max
T T T
eff
=
cs as eff
T T T =
Using equations (1), (2) & (3), we have
) )( ( 2
* *
c a
V
T
eff
v v T
dc
s
=
(7)
Similarly for Invertre-2:
' '
min as
T T =
' '
max cs
T T =
' ' '
as cs eff
T T T =
Using equations (4), (5) & (6), we have
) )( ( 2
* * '
c a
V
T
eff
v v T
dc
s
=
(8)
Asian Power Electronics Journal, Vol. 1, No. 1, Aug 2007
109
It is obvious that the effective-time period for inverter-1
and inverter-2 are equal, as the reference vector is resolved
into two equal halves.
From equations (7) & (8), we have
'
eff eff
T T =
(9)
As
eff s o
T T T =
&
' '
eff s o
T T T =
[5]
'
o o
T T =
[from eqn.(9)]
It was shown in [5] that the time-offset required to place
the effective time period at the centre of the sampling time
interval is given by:
min
2
T
T
T
o
offset
=
Hence for inverter-1, the time-offset is:
*
) ( 2
2
c
dc
s o
offset
v
V
T T
T =
Similarly,
'
min
'
2
T
T
T
o
offset
=
*
) ( 2
2
a
dc
s o
v
V
T T
+ =
From the algorithm proposed in [5], the phase switching
time for phase-A for inverter-1 is given by:
offset as ga
T T T + = (10)
* *
) ( 2
2
) ( 2
c
dc
s o
a
dc
s
v
V
T T
v
V
T
+ =
) )( ( 2
2
* *
c a
V
T
o
ga
v v
T
T
dc
s
+ = (11)
Similarly for inverter-2,
' ' '
offset as ga
T T T + =
* *
) ( 2
2
) ( 2
a
dc
s o
a
dc
s
v
V
T T
v
V
T
+ + =
2
' o
ga
T
T = (12)
From equations (11) & (12), it is evident that
) )( ( 2
* * '
c a
dc
s
o ga ga
v v
V
T
T T T + = +
From eqn.7,
eff o ga ga
T T T T + = +
'
s
T =
ga s ga
T T T =
'
Similarly, the phase switching times for the other two
phases are given as:
gb s gb
T T T =
'
gc s gc
T T T =
'
BIOGRAPHIES
S.Srinivas received the B.E degree in
Electrical Engineering from Osmania
University College of Engineering and his
Masters degree from Regional
Engineering College-Warangal in 1997
and 2002 respectively.
He is currently working towards the Ph.D
degree at National Institute of
Technology-Warangal.
He joined the Faculty of Electrical
Engineering National Institute of
Technology-Warangal in the year 1997.
His research interests are multi-level inverters, PWM Switching
Strategies, Multi-level inversion realized through Open-end winding
Induction motor drives, AC drives etc.
Dr. V.T. Somasekhar received his
graduate degree from Regional
Engineering College Warangal (presently
the National Institute of Technology) in
1988 and the post graduate degree from
the Indian Institute of Technology,
Bombay in 1990, his area of
specialization being Power Electronics.
He worked as an R&D engineer at M/s
Perpetual Power Technologies, Bangalore
and as a senior engineer at M/s Kirloskar
Electric Co. Ltd., Mysore. He joined the
faculty of electrical engineering at the
National Institute of Technology in 1993, where he is currently
serving. He received his doctoral degree from the Indian Institute of
Science in 2003. His current interests are multilevel inversion with
open-end induction motors, AC drives and PWM strategies.
S.Srinivas et al: Switching Algorithms for the Dual Inverter fed ...
110