Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Investment
returns
The
rate
of
return
on
an
investment
can
be
calculated
as
follows:
Return
=
________________________
For
example,
if
$1,000
is
invested
and
$1,100
is
returned
aOer
one
year,
the
rate
of
return
for
this
investment
is:
($1,100
-
$1,000)
/
$1,000
=
10%.
8-2
Investment risk is related to the probability of earning a low or negaVve actual return. The greater the chance of lower than expected or negaVve returns, the riskier the investment.
8-3
Probability
distribuVons
A
lisVng
of
all
possible
outcomes,
and
the
probability
of
each
occurrence.
Can
be
shown
graphically.
Firm X
8-4
Source:
Based
on
Stocks,
Bonds,
Bills,
and
Ina1on:
(Valua1on
Edi1on)
2005
Yearbook
(Chicago:
Ibbotson
Associates,
2005),
p28.
8-5
Investment
alternaVves
Economy Prob. 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.1 T-Bill 5.5% 5.5% 5.5% 5.5% 5.5% HT -27.0% -7.0% 15.0% 30.0% 45.0% Coll 27.0% 13.0% 0.0% -11.0% -21.0% USR 6.0% -14.0% 3.0% 41.0% 26.0% MP -17.0% -3.0% 10.0% 25.0% 38.0%
8-6
Why
is
the
T-bill
return
independent
of
the
economy?
Do
T-bills
promise
a
completely
risk-free
return?
n
T-bills will return the promised 5.5%, regardless of the economy. No, T-bills do not provide a completely risk-free return, as they are still exposed to inflation. Although, very little unexpected inflation is likely to occur over such a short period of time. T-bills are also risky in terms of reinvestment rate risk. T-bills are risk-free in the default sense of the word.
8-7
How do the returns of HT and Coll. behave in relaVon to the market? HT Moves with the economy, and has a posiVve correlaVon. This is typical. Coll. Is countercyclical with the economy, and has a negaVve correlaVon. This is unusual.
8-8
r HT = (-27%) (0.1) + (-7%) (0.2) + (15%) (0.4) + (30%) (0.2) + (45%) (0.1) = 12.4%
8-9
HT
has
the
highest
expected
return,
and
appears
to
be
the
best
investment
alternaVve,
but
is
it
really?
Have
we
failed
to
account
for
risk?
8-10
= Standard deviation
= Variance = 2
=
N
i =1
(ri )2 Pi r
8-11
i =1
(ri r )2 Pi
2 2
T bills
(5.5 - 5.5) (0.1) + (5.5 - 5.5) (0.2) = + (5.5 - 5.5) 2 (0.4) + (5.5 - 5.5) 2 (0.2) + (5.5 - 5.5) 2 (0.1)
T - bill USR HT
5.5 9.8
12.4
8-16
Collections has the highest degree of risk per unit of return. HT, despite having the highest standard deviation of returns, has a relatively average CV.
8-17
A
=
B
,
but
A
is
riskier
because
of
a
larger
probability
of
losses.
In
other
words,
the
same
amount
of
risk
(as
measured
by
)
for
smaller
returns.
8-18
8-19
8-20
HT -7.0% 15.0%
-27.0% 27.0%
30.0% -11.0%
r p = 0.10 (0.0%) + 0.20 (3.0%) + 0.40 (7.5%) + 0.20 (9.5%) + 0.10 (12.0%) = 6.7%
8-22
= 3.4%
8-25
Stock M
25 15 0
Portfolio WM
-10
-10
-10
8-26
Stock M
25 15 0 -10 25 15 0 -10
Stock M
25 15 0 -10
Portfolio MM
8-27
CreaVng
a
por3olio:
Beginning
with
one
stock
and
adding
randomly
selected
stocks
to
por3olio
p
decreases
as
stocks
added,
because
they
would
not
be
perfectly
correlated
with
the
exisVng
por3olio.
Expected
return
of
the
por3olio
would
remain
relaVvely
constant.
Eventually
the
diversicaVon
benets
of
adding
more
stocks
dissipates
(aOer
about
10
stocks),
and
for
large
stock
por3olios,
p
tends
to
converge
to
20%.
8-28
10
20
30
40
# Stocks in Portfolio
2,000+
8-29
Failure
to
diversify
If
an
investor
chooses
to
hold
a
one-stock
por3olio
(doesn t
diversify),
would
the
investor
be
compensated
for
the
extra
risk
they
bear?
NO!
Stand-alone
risk
is
not
important
to
a
well- diversied
investor.
RaVonal,
risk-averse
investors
are
concerned
with
p,
which
is
based
upon
market
risk.
There
can
be
only
one
price
(the
market
return)
for
a
given
security.
No
compensaVon
should
be
earned
for
holding
unnecessary,
diversiable
risk.
8-31
Primary
conclusion:
The
relevant
riskiness
of
a
stock
is
its
contribuVon
to
the
riskiness
of
a
well-diversied
por3olio.
8-32
Beta
Measures
a
stock s
market
risk,
and
shows
a
stock s
volaVlity
relaVve
to
the
market.
Indicates
how
risky
a
stock
is
if
the
stock
is
held
in
a
well-diversied
por3olio.
8-33
Comments
on
beta
If
beta
=
1.0,
the
security
is
just
as
risky
as
the
average
stock.
If
beta
>
1.0,
the
security
is
riskier
than
average
(Aggressive
stock)
If
beta
<
1.0,
the
security
is
less
risky
than
average
(Defensive
Stock)
Most
stocks
have
betas
in
the
range
of
0.5
to
1.5.
8-34
8-35
CalculaVng
betas
Well-diversied
investors
are
primarily
concerned
with
how
a
stock
is
expected
to
move
relaVve
to
the
market
in
the
future.
Without
a
crystal
ball
to
predict
the
future,
analysts
are
forced
to
rely
on
historical
data.
A
typical
approach
to
esVmate
beta
is
to
run
a
regression
of
the
security s
past
returns
against
the
past
returns
of
the
market.
The
slope
of
the
regression
line
is
dened
as
the
beta
coecient
for
the
security.
8-36
ri
.
5 10
Year 1 2 3
rM 15% -5 12
ri 18% -10 16
-5
0 -5 -10
15
20
_
rM
Regression line:
i
^ = -2.59 + 1.44 r ^ r
8-37
_ ri
HT: b = 1.30
20 T-bills: b = 0
-20
20
40
_ kM
8-42
r Undervalue d (r > r) Fairly valued (r = r) Overvalued (r < r) Fairly valued (r = r) Overvalued (r < r)
8-43
^ ^ ^ ^ ^
12.4% 12.1% 10.5 9.8 5.5 1.0 10.5 9.9 5.5 1.2
SML
Coll.
. T-bills
. ..
USR
1 2
Risk, bi
8-44
8-46
I = 3%
SML2 SML1
RPM = 3%
SML2 SML1