An investigation of Marketing mix elements influencing Brand equity and Brand Choice in UK Womenwears.

Acknowledgement

Table of Contents

Abstract
The aim of this dissertation was to conduct an investigation of Marketing mix elements influencing Brand equity and Brand Choice in UK Womenwears companies. The research attempts to achieve following objectives: to study the character and consequence of Marketing-mix elements over brand-formation particularly regarding Brand-Equity and Brand-Choice in UKs women-wears division; to probe the newest drifts in womens style-wears and elements influencing the marketing

activities , similarly; to examine the influence of these marketing activities on manipulating consumers behaviors of womens in UK. The research has answered following research questions: what is Brand-equity and how is the Brand-equity formed or formulated; what are the functions and features of Brand-equity; what are the characters and consequence of Marketing mix elements over the formation of brand-equity; and what are the impacts of marketing activities or actions over the behavior of the customers. For achieving the aims and objectives of the research and answer the research questions, 50 Marketing/Brand Managers working in UK Womenwear companies were surveyed through questionnaire. The major findings of the research are given below.

In the main product and promotion are the focused elements in marketing mix strategy of UK based womens wear companies. Quality and association are the

focused elements in brand equity strategy of UK based womens wear companies. In the main name and feature are the focused elements in brand choice strategy of UK based womens wear companies. Product and promotion are the focused marketing mix elements in brand equity of UK based womens wear companies. In the main product and price are the focused marketing mix elements in brand choice of UK based womens wear companies. Brand equity has highly effective role in influencing consumer decision making for UK based womens wear companies. Brand choice has highly effective role in influencing consumer decision making for UK based womens wear companies. Brand equity has comparatively more influence

on consumer decision making than brand choice for UK based womens wear companies. Peer recommendation is most effective in brand equity and brand choice for UK based womens wear companies. In most cases advertising is highly effective in brand equity and brand choice for companies. marketing of UK based womens wear

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Marketing-strategy is generallyconsidered asanimportantmannertoestablish brand-equity. Extensivelycurrently, diverseauthors hadrevealed the Course to diverse marketing-mix constituentseffecting brand-equity. The studymerges the familiarkinds of Brand-Equity structure to of the mannergoods perceive the the are linkamongmarketing events and brand-equity for women-wear in UK market. Brand-equity inheritancesariseout prevailingconsumerunderstandingwhichinfluences

established and presentedthroughconsumers. It situates to describe that these comprehensions are supple and influencesconsumer preferencesprocess and consequence, directly or indirectly, byinspiring them all over the efficacy of the goods (branded) marketing-mixconstituents. This researchaccountsconsumer preferencesbecause of brand-equity and struggles to study the on significanceseveralmarketing-mixconstituents consumerseventual brand-choice. The consequence of marketing-mixcomponentsover be describedregarding This study brand-equity the is mightinclude

canessentially

essentialmeasurespresentedhypotheticaloutcome.

framedaccordingto the sanctionedbasicagenda. Successively to examine the conformistrudimentaryagenda and studygrounds, an examinational research was performedover the inhabitants of youth and employedfemales for womenwear in UK. The projectedrudimentaryfactor(s) and inclinedeffectfactor(s) represents the courses and powers of influences of everyexaminedconstituents of marketing-mix on brand-equity. Lastly, proposals of the studyconsequences for the grounds and purposes of branding are deliberated and communicatedrelating towomen-wear in United Kingdom.

Branding and Positioning There isnt any uncertainty regarding the detail that brand-management performs authoritative part in efficient positioning. Mr. Jack Trout (2000) hits synchronization to branding expert(s) of Walter Landors proclamation that good(s) are manufactured in factory; but brands are shaped in the mind. McCarthy, (1960) promoted that powerful brand names, therefore are produced through adapting appropriate marketing-mix i.e. price, promotion, product and place to grip positioning adjacent to mind of the market or customers in association to the competing brand(s) (Kotler and Armstrong, 2008).Positioning or repositioning can arise with goods and several retailer shop (Kerin, et. al, 2006). Brand-management does the too significant deed in positioning. Positioning strength includes adequately known valueproposition, for instance, differentiating an extensive however clear and specific value-proposition, and properly deliberated brands, such as brand-name, strong brand associations and declaration, and handling customers brand associations (Kotler, 1999). Kotler and Keller, (2006) recommended that explicit to marketing, plans and strategies rests on STP (segmentation, targeting and positioning). The study here assimilates the known arrangements of Brand-Equity construction to examine the relationship linking marketing efforts and brandequity for women-wear in the United Kingdom market. Brand-equity rises out of the present-days or forthcoming potential consumer knowledge which influences the manner goods are arranged and reacted over through consumers. It attempts to recommend that this sort of understanding is supple and vivacious, affecting the consumers brand-choice and consequence, directly and indirectly, affected via the utility of marketing-mix basics of goods with powerful brand-names. The research concerns the consumers likings of a specific brand by means of brand-equity and attempt to estimate the significance of varied marketing-mix fundamentals that might places an impact on consumers eventual brand-choice.

Fashionable and Trendy clothing sales were relatively soaring destructive and verified to be the profitable portion of UKs retail trade. For these clothing retailers of diffusion lines, these retails salivated sinking out of foot-bridge to roads of mass-marketing. Subsequently, the load to store the modern trendy apparel was important. The careless and unwary customers inclined the consumer conduct in this vivacious United Kingdoms market. To comprehend and endure the violent aids of the firm, retailers are meant to exploit a retailplan that carefully links to the customers apparels liking. Customer trustworthiness, area and produce are satisfied to the flourishing trend inventors. 1.2 UK CLOTHING/APPAREL MARKET

United Kingdoms clothing section was measured about 32.3 billion Ponds past fiscal year in 2010, along-with women-wear, around 57(%) of entire section. Inside the whole global clothing industry, Retailers joins in the increasing valuesub-division which has considerably established the wide extent in the contemporary fiscal year. Though the value-segments has been inquiring since 2010 and is conceivable to continue lasting heartless in short-range, the ongoing position for several retailers apparels upholds to be unevenly positive. Although a prime force for peoples continuance, clothes regards for a decreasing portion of consumer expenditures, consistently in United Kingdom and a selection of fresh urbanized countries. In 2000, UK consumers expenditures on apparel measured for around 34.15 billion Ponds. However combined it under a massive market, as the portions of entire buyer expenditures reduce to 5.8(%) out of 6.3(%) in 1996. Apparel for females comprise the biggest sector in common apparel, excluding the sports apparels that are prejudiced to males. 1.3 RESEARCH RATIONALE

The researchforms and investigation-allyinspects the diverseconstructionsso as to conclude the bases and effects of brand-equity over United Kingdoms women-wearindustry. Mentioning it yet again, Brand-Equity

conceptstructureprovidedviaYoo, Donthu and Lee (2000) was prolonged and collectiveviameans of Brand-Choice framedeliberatedviaErdem, et al (1999). The range of brand-equity was accounted to influencevia a huge BrandEquity, which finallyinfluenced the eventual brand-choice equippedout of the customers. The consequence of somechosen marketing-mix eventswhichwas comprised on the scope of brand-equity was examined. The study was performedthroughgatheringcommunicators information or data across10 apparel storesentirelyvia the country. A rudimentarydifferencecomponent was applied for purpose of a difficultexamination. The variedconsequencesattained in thisstudyregarding determinationsover the priorstudiesdisclose the samecultural Once more and as ethnicaldifferencesamongcustomersfacilitating the effect of marketing-mix brand-equity formations. everyseparateprospects of brand-equity beneath the study wereexposed to positivelyaffect brand-choice, it is been supposed that prospective of customersdesiring the eventualbrand hasexpandedvia a lift-up in equity of the brand-name. Geographicalrestriction of the sample-volume and absence of interaction and amalgamation of marketing-mix fundamentalsamongst these components had been renowned as some of the importantlimits of thestudy. Promotion and marketing tactics are generallymeasured as the maincourse to establish brand-equity. Regarding the prior, variousstudies hadinspected the diverse marketing-mix rudimentsinfluence of the brand-equity. The importance of brand-equity encompassesvariousbenefits for

companieshavingsolidbrand(s). Brand-equity has a positivelinkingto brandloyalty. Furthermore, brand-equity clearlyenhances the prospective of brandchoice, subsequent to customerreliability to a particularbrand-name (Pitta and Katsanis, 1995). Between the prizesdelivered by raised brand-equity is the view of brand-extension to numerousproduct-mixes. Normally, brandextension can be described as the manipulation of existingbrand-iconstoenter the newproduct-portfolio (Aaker and Keller, 1990). Smith and Park, (1992) backed that as contrary to the most recentbrand icon(s), brand extensionconsiders for slightadvertising expenditure and greatertrades. Positivebrand expansionpoint to progressive brand-equity of novelbrands

(Keller and Aaker, 1992), however, infertileexpansion or extensions canfade brand-equity of the parent-brand (Loken and John, 1993). A specialsetting for customerassessment of brand-expansions was conceivedviaAaker and Keller (1990) and numerousacademics and marketing-specialistsstruggled on inclusivestatement of the section (Barrett et al., 1999). 1.4 AIM AND OBJECTIVES OF RESEARCH To study the character and consequence of Marketing-mix elementsover brand-formationparticularlyregardingBrand-Equity and Brand-Choice in United Kingdoms women-wearsdivision. To To probe examine the the newestdrifts influence of in these womensstyle-wears marketing activities and on elementsinfluencing the marketing activities, similarly. manipulatingconsumers behaviors of womens in United Kingdom. 1.5 RESEARCH QUESTIONS What is Brand-equity and how is the Brand-equity formed or formulated? What are the functions and features of Brand-equity? What are the characters and consequence of Marketing mix elements over the formation of brand-equity? What are the impacts of marketing activities or actions over the behavior of the customers?

2. LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1

INTRODUCTION

Corporationsdevotemillions of dollars on marketing to enhancethebrandimage and at the same timedevotemillions of dollars on advertising and promotion-activitieswhichseveralconsider,appealsconsideration to cost and corrodesbrand-equity. contendefficiently activities and in vibrant We marketplace. for consider Therefore, this brandBy inconsistentconditionprevailssincemarketing and advertising are essential to administratorsrequireconsideration communicationsamongmarketingadministrators the marketing-

communicationsbetweenchallengingbrands. in scheduling

identifyingcommunicationimpactamongstactions, coulddeliberateinteractivitytrade-offs mixtactics. In contrast, by

identifyingcommunicationsalongopponents,

administrators couldintegratetacticalprudence in their schedulingthatneeds them to see ahead and aimrecessive in formingbestjudgments. Viewing aheadrefers that everybrand-managerexpects how differentcontendingbrands are probable to formforthcomingjudgments, and formerly by cognitiveregressiveassumes one's own bestjudgments in reaction to finestjudgments mutualdeliberation issuethatinspires prominence in to of this be formed by entiredifferentbrands. and of tacticalanticipation brand equity upholding The in has and the communicationimpact research.The market notion of

schedulingmarketing-mixtactics is a complex and unresolvedmarketing attractedresearchers and experts for over ten years, chieflybecause of the contemporary to construction, The choosingbrands gaintacticalbenefit. impressionmeans

rudimentaryknowledge that a goodsworth to customers, the business and the firm is in some wayboosted when it is allied or recognizedabove time along a group of exclusivecomponentswhichdescribesbrand idea. Evidently, such paritybenefaction arisesout ofprevailing or prospectivecustomerunderstandingthateffects how the goodsareencrypted and

dealtthroughcustomers. It positions to intent that such understanding is vigorous straightly and or effectscustomerlikingprocedures inferentially by influencing and the consequences efficiency of either the

trademarked/branded goods over marketing mixcomponents. In last eras, the prominence of imprinting and handling of brand equity has enlargedextremely. Brands hasdeveloped to the vital competitionmeansince they endure for-ever, are substantiallyaccessible, formsmassiveperks, and are convenientovergoods and alsotypes (Hill, 2004). Still the portfolio of customer has alteredin years sincecustomersat the present know muchregardinggoods and servicesbecause they couldrelatevalues Thus, they and dont interchangeviewstodifferentcustomersthroughweb.

purchase/consume inactivelyany longer;however hasturn out to bevery muchobsessiveregarding the goods and brands they purchase, and desire their brands to develop a system of self-expression. (Brady et al., 2004) Accordingly the role for brand managers has evenmoved and has formedvery muchtough. Each year, anoverflow of novelgoods come in the marketplace, the competitiveness has formmuchferocious, and the conduct of forming and upholding the worth of a brand hadformeddifficult. The rudimentaryissue is that, whileeach-one comprehends a positivebrandat the time they viewit; nooneactuallycomprehends, explains as the how to make the another-one. Not (Hill, is 2004) the Additionalissuewhichprevails is what Buchholz and Worde Mann (2000) marketingbreakdown. merely goodsworldgrowingwhereas the customerworld is dwindling, goods and servicestoodevelopedincreasinglyexchangeable to the opinion that frequently its almostimpossible the to figure in of outtheselling buyingjudgments. datawhich the customer they is pointfoundedoverunbiasedstandardelements. The consequence of it is that pricegenerallyforms are swampedevery-day is conclusiveelement a greatamount since Additionalfeatureabove the marketing breakdown is the dataexcess; customers with couldmerelyabridge a toominorextent of it. This information overload is acausethatbranding developingtoovital,

challengedalong a massivesupply with slightqualitative varianceamongst the selections. (Gray, 2004) Despite this aggressiveatmosphere, and yet because, there for arebrands a firm, that its

constantlycontinuemounting

brandsgenerallyindicatethemain competitionmean, the problemascends as, whats the clandestine of those mega brands?Because of the prominence of branding and powerful competitionbenefitwhich could be acquiredviastrongbrands;numerousstudieshad been performed in the previous year. Thoughseveralvalueddata could be regainedout of this study, its yettoodifficult to provide a definitesolution or method of, how to form a positivemega brand. Although, Hill (2004) is persuaded that the method for converting (2000) the brand are prospective to a sure could mega brand is that be groundedabovetheusualgrowth over-moments, Buchholz and Worde Mann eachsuccessfulbrandshadowssomeevolutionencryptionswhich

implicatedastheblueprintfordifferentbrands. Brandy et al. (2004) considers that cult brandsthat are brandsalong-with typicalphilosophies and along a precised and dedicatedgroup/community, displays anexcessivecommitment or devotion. These are coveredthroughthe set of fairlydescribed and thoroughlyimposedstandards, whenattaining their cultposition,

viacultivationpowerfulrelationsalong consumers than differentbrands and viaproposing an appealinggroup identity. Aaker (1990,1991, 1995), besides, targetsovertacticallyhandlingbrand equity, brand portfolio and brand extension, so as to protected the enduringtriumph of thebrands. The literature section of this research is formed including Brand-equity and its theories along with the function of the brand so as to have a comprehensive knowledge regarding the related philosophies and context provided by different researchers or academics. Subsequently, the brand equity perceived through the perspective of the customers and the firms are deliberated to have a comprehensive framework of the brand equity. Precisely, we examined the interactive connection among five apparent marketing mix activities and

brand equity and discovered certain significant inferences for the brand equity formation procedure. Moreover, the concept of brand loyalty and the marketing-mix elements influencing brand loyalty is deliberated examining the effect of the marketing mix elements or factors manipulating customers behavior of women wears in United Kingdom. Further the literature section emphasis the marketing activities deliberating each marketing action and its effect over the customers of women wears and in turn over the brand equity and its choice.

2.2

BRAND EQUITY AND ITS THEORIES

Brand-equity is a multifacetednotionAaker (1996). It encompasses brandloyalty,brand-awareness, othermitigationbrand perceived-quality, means. brand-association, and Severalacademics

hadveryexpectedcorrespondingmagnitudes. Whileseveralauthors hadpredicted brand-loyalty and brand-associations, Keller (2003) suggested for brandknowledge, including brand-awareness could be and brand-image. as Deceptivestandard defined

consumersinclinedjudgmentaboutthegoods and enormoussupremacy. Brandloyalty is extremelyinternedreassurancein the direction of re-purchasing a preferredstuff for consumption or service,repeatedly in the futureperiods. Devotedcustomers have to recognized them-selfs than to unexhibitfurtheroptimisticresponse thespecificbrand

devotedcustomers. Brandparticipation might be defined as anything related with the rumination of the consumersdirectedto the brand, whilebrandconsciousness couldbewell-defined as comfort of reachto the brand name in customersmemory/mind (Chattopadhyay, Shivani and Krishnan, 2008). Brandconsciousness in combinationto well-formedbrand-involvementforms a brawnybrand-image. Brand-connectionwhichconsequences raised brandconsciousness ispositivelyallied to brand-equity, for it might be a sign of brilliance and maythereforehelp the customerstrust the brand at the point of possession. StudyviaErdem, et al (2001) established that brand-equity concept might be comprehendedwell if inspected in thebroaderconstructthatassesses the

extraeffect of brandcrossways the variedstages of consumerslikingprocess. So, brand-equity does a mainduty in the mannercustomerslearningthatreclaimed for forming the substitute. The Informationindulgencehits broaderexplanationexpands the the inducementopportunitiesrecognized and finally the selection are exploited in constructingcompletelikings. accumulativenotionsinherent in e protective brand crashnotion of brandequity in the direction of anaddedcomprehensiveprogressthatpressures on the brands taskcrossways the activeconsumerlikingprocess. Reverberating to Aakersnotion, Yoo, and Lee (2000) structured the BrandEquity constructionevolution forms to systematicallyreview the relationship in the mid of marketing effort, brand-equity magnitude, and brand-equity. Therefore, the relationshipamongmarketing efforts and brand-equity is mediatedviatheseextents. Thisstudyreveals that notablerelationsexistamong the ranges it-selfs. This frameworkoffered a superbinitialspotprojectedexpected for additionalexaminationover the associationconnectingmarketing actions and brand-equity. Since the Brand-Equity notionprocesscustomsrecognized by Yoo, Donthu and Lee (2000) istailored and protracted in the study to determine the relationship of marketing actionsvia brand-equity and finallythrough brand-choice in women-wear marketplace, the connotationborderedviamarketing events/action and brand-equity willtoo be lonely of the corefocus of the study. Moreover, brand-equity couldaugment (a) willingness of consumers to pay best price (b) probability of brand recognition, (c) capability of marketing interaction, (d) keenness of deliveries to collaborate and providehelp, (e) flexibility of consumers to costcut, and (f) rigidity of consumers to costrise, and drop the businessvulnerability to marketing actions of the competitors and its helplessness to disaster (Keller, 2003; Yoo et al., 2001). Generally, one cansay that brand-equity parallels to thebasis of enduringcompetitiveness (Bharadwaj et al.,1993; Hoffman, 2000). Additionally, writingsidentify a crash of brandequity over the retail market reaction (Lane and Jacobson, 1995; Simon and Sullivan, 1993). Presently, abundantportrayals of brand-equity, which

mayconsequence

to

the

theoreticmisapprehension

at

themoment

whileexamining thenoticeabledetail. A try to classify the variedcourse to the connotation of brand-equity (Feldwick, 1996) may be supportive in clarifyingvariedmeans and relationsregarded in the complexnotion of brandequity. Feldwick (1996) has documentedthreevariedmeans to brand-equity i) brand worthii) brand potency(the strength of consumerassurance to a meticulous-brand,that isconduct is progressed) and iii) brand explanation (associations and approachconsumershaveregardingreliablebrandsthat is the cognitive- practice). Brand strength and brand image are customer-focused aspects of brand-equity, althoughbrand worth is a fiscalaspect of brandequity.

2.3

FUNCTIONS OF A BRAND

Subsequentlydeliberatingdiversenotions on brand portfoliomanaging and brand architecture, the succeedingportion of thisstudy woulddeliver the tasks a brand has plusintricateover the diversekinds of brandswhichprevails. Illustrating is significantso as to understand what effectsbrandspossessover the firm and the consumer, and to be conscious of how diversebrandformsis to be copedidiosyncratically. There isnumeroustasksbrandstransportto the buyerand the vendor. Purchasers brands couldaid to recognizegoods and henceabridge guaranteeing their a goodsjudgmentthroughdippinghuntexpense of value. Accordingly, and the specificstandard

purchaserobservesthelesserdanger in purchasing the goods. (Dalrymple& Parsons, 2000) Additionaladvantage of brands to purchaser is that they couldgainmentalbootyviabuyingbrands, hencedipping anincorrectgoods. introduction their (Dalrymple& thatspecifyposition to 2000) Vendors and esteem, psychosomaticjeopardylinked Parsons, purchasing couldgainout and

ofbrandssuch far that brandsaidcompanies to endorserebuying and offreshgoods/products. They abridgepersuasivetask endorsebrand loyaltyovergoods/product sets. By forming a significantclass of

difference, brandsenablespremium pricing and forms it likely for vendors to constantlyinteractwiththefocusedcluster. (Dalrymple& Parsons, 2000). 2.3.1 Brand Equity from the Perspective of the Consumer Consumerattitudeassessment as definitevia Keller and Lehmann (2003) comprise all that prevails in the head of consumersregardingthebrand (e.g. views, moods, understandings, pictures, insights, trust, and approaches) and include anextensiverange of measurable and non-measurablemeans of brand equity. These means/measures of customer-groundedbrand equity hadgainedsignificantconsideration in academe (e.g. Aaker 1991, 1996; Keller 1993, 2003) andbusiness (e.g. Young and Rubicams Brand Asset Valuator; Total Research Corporations Equitrend; Landor Associates Image Power). For instance, Keller (2003) and consumersapproach/attitude Keller and Lehmann (2003) proposed that measures could be abridgedthrough five

crucialextentswhichcomprisesbrand awareness, brand associations, brand attitudes, brand attachment, and brand activity. 2.3.2 Brand equity from the perspective of the firm Researches and whichaccountsbrand of Goods gain, equityout of the viewpoint of and market

organizationdeliberatebrand equity as the worth of brand to the company includesmaximum (2003). goods-market consequence fiscalconsequenceassessment of brand equitycharacterizedvia Keller and Lehmann resultassessmentinvolve or price premium, conductpointerslikeproceeds, and they are

generallymeasuredout ofwitnessed market information (e.g. Holbrook 1992; Ailawadi, Lehmann, and Neslin 2003). Oncemeasured as a exceptionalmean, they are calculatedregardingthefoundationbrandwhich could be a general or reservedtagbrand, the trademean, or a challengingdomestic brand with a inferiorevenhandednesscomparative companieslocateoverbrand as to the differentbrandswithin thefiscalmean/asset, the and marketplace. Fiscalconsequencemeansaccounts the worth that stockholders and

mightcompriseseveralenactmentpointers worthperceived in fiscal-marketplaces. 2.4 FIRM-BASED BRAND EQUITY

of

brands

or

companies

IN

THE

FORM

OF

MARKET

PERFORMANCE Lots of company-grounded, market-enactmentmeans of brand equity has been projected in the writings. Along withmutualmeans/measures likeincome, proceeds, and market-portion, other meanscompriseincome premium (Ailawadi et al. 2003), price premium (e.g. Holbrook 1992; Randall, Ulrich, and Reibstein 1998; Sethuraman 2003), portion of classneeds (e.g. Aaker 1996), etc. Especially, Ailawadi et al. (2003) deliberatelots of diverseconceivablepointers of thebrands market-enactment/performance to form the situation for revenue premium as a suitablemarketplaceconsequencemeans of brand equity. In their theoreticmodel, they clarify that thebrands sales are thetask of its evenhandednessplus its marketing mix and those of its rivals, and that brand equity time, is and sequentiallytheoccupation of the brands and that marketing mix, in or classfeatures, and companiespower. These marketplace forces relateat the same marketplaceenactmentmeanlikeproceeds They or evenproposed gains are gainsrealized fiscal of competitionsymmetry.

monetarymeanslikeproceeds

bestpointers

brands

enactmentmatched to meanssuch asportion or price premiumsince the prior take into considerationactivities in cost and size. Therefore, frameworkof income premium as themarket enactmentmeans of companygroundedbrand equity. Furthermore, we suggest a substitutemean/measure of market performance in terms of thebrands profit-premium, that is the incremental profitamassing to thegoodsbecause of its brand name and is described as the varianceamongproceeds of the central-brand and that of thechallengingfoundation-brand. To finalize the examination, we even modeled the brandsproceeds and returns in their complete forms as conceivablemeans of the brands market-performance.

2.5

BRAND LOYALTY

There are numerouseffectivedescriptions of brand loyalty. Generally, brand loyalty could be described as the power of liking for thebrandmatched to differentalikeexistingalternatives. This is generallycalculatedas repurchase nature or cost-sensitivity (Brandchannel.com, 2006). Though, Bloemer and Kasper (1995) describedexactbrand loyalty as possessingsixessentialsituations,that are: (a) the biased (i.e. non-random); (b) behavioral response (i.e. purchase); (c) expressed over-time; (d) by certaindecision-makingentities; procedures. (e) True regardingsingle or more brandthe substitutebrandsfromgroup of thesebrands; and (f) a task of psychological loyaltyprevailsonceconsumerspossessthegreatcomparativeapproachin

direction of the branddisplayedvia repeat buyingbehavior. Thesesorts of devotion could be theexcessivemean/asset to the corporations: consumers are eager The to recompensegreatercosts, might doesnt cost-cut try to any function type and of the ofpriorunderstandingalong-with couldtransportfreshconsumers to the corporations (Reichheld and Sasser, 1990). brandsfaithfulcustomer characteristicestimationhowevermerelyselects This generaloptimisticassessmentstalksout

accustomedbrandconsideringfewcompleteoptimisticspiritsin the direction of it. specificbrandat issue.

2.6 Lau

MARKETING MIX FACTORS INFLUENCING BRAND LOYALTY/CHOICE et al. (2006) in his worksstated loyaltyin that the there direction

aresevenelementswhichinclinedcustomersbrand

ofspecificsportswear brands. The elementsare: brand-name, goods-standard, cost, pattern, shopatmosphere, campaign and amenitystandard.

2.6.1 Brand Name Popular (Keller, brand-names 2003). There the coulddistributegoodsaids are and induces to and to

greaterrecollection of marketedaids/advantages than unpopularbrand-names severalignorantbrand-names market. Customers mightwish substitutesexistingwithin

believechiefpopularbrand-names. These prominentbrand-names and their picturesappealcustomers to buy the brand product and generaterepurchasing nature and decreasecostlinkedto swappingnature (Cadogan and Foster, 2000). Moreover, brand-personalitydeliversassociates to brandsemotive and selfcommunicativeadvantages for variation. Its significant for brandsthat possessmerelyslightphysicalalterations communalbackground brandcouldproducetheperceptiblepictureregarding Besides, to fashion-magazines and the customerby fashion-pressintricateover Customers for are and are used in a self. the where

stylistsgatherings to the fullermagnitude and hencestrengthenimprovedpictures enablecustomeracknowledgement. that this data is vital generallycapableof administrators re-placing to and evaluatingeverygoods and brand-namecharacteristics (Keller, 2003). Its notable marketing formknowledgeablejudgmentsregardinggoodsplacing, distinctbenefits. 2.6.2 Product Quality Product-Qualitycomprises the characteristics and features of

thegoods/amenitywhichstandsover its skill to contentspecified or inferredwants. Or say, product-quality is described as soundness for usage or conformation to needs (Russell and Taylor, 2006). Customers might repurchase asolebrands or shiftovernumerousbrandsbecauseofpalpablestandard of the goodsvended. As perFrings (2005), the factors of product-quality of trendyproducecomprisedimensionscalculation, wounding or fitting, substance, shade, task and the enactment of the produce. Fitting is a vitalfacet in clothingcollectionsincecertain fittingclotheslikeswimming outfits and aerobicclothing couldpreferablyimprove the customersoveralllook. Substance/material

is significant in product-qualitysince it impacts the hand-feel, texture and differentexecutionfacets of goods. Additionally, customerslinksindividually to shade/color, and canchoose or discardthestyledue tocolor. If the color doesnt attracts them or adulate their self-color, they woulddiscard the style (Frings, 2005). 2.6.3 Price AsperCadogan loyalty are and keen Foster to (2000), cost/price a is perhaps for the their

utmostsignificantdeliberation for usualcustomers. Customershavinggreatbrandrecompense premium-price preferredbrand,therefore, their buyingaim isnt simplyinfluencedviaprice. Additionally, consumerspossess a robusttrust in the price and worth of their belovedbrandstoo-much so as torelate and assesspricestosubstitutebrands (Evans et al., 1996; Keller, 2003). Customerscontentment couldeven be formedviarelatingpricetoapparent cost and worth. If the apparentworth of goodsissuperiorto thecost, its witnessed that customers wouldbuy thegoods. 2.6.4 Price Promotion Althoughcertainreadings in textsproposetheadverseenduringeffect of pricepromotionsovercapacity-premiums (Foekens, Leeflang, and Wittink 1999), others proposereverseinfluencebecause of the affirmativeimpact of statedneed and acquisitionstrengthening itsunclear to us (Ailawadi whether the et al. 2005). Others the to hadestablishedmerely a briefadverseinfluence (Pauwels and Koen, 2004). Inclusive, this. affirmativeimpactleads are normallyformed adverseimpactoverequity, and anextensiveoverviewappearsessentialregarding Comparatively, discountingstrategies upsurgeprice-sensitivity (cutmargin premiums) viaconcentratingcustomers responsiveness to price-orientedsignals (Mela, C. et.al., (1997); Pauwels et al. 2002).

2.6.5 Style Style is pictoriallook thatcomprisesmark, shape and

particularsinfluencingcustomerinsightin the direction ofthebrand (Frings, 2005). Asper Abraham and Littrell (1995), a compoundedschedule of attractioncharacteristicsisproduced Customersdecisionrests presentlytrendy. over and the atheoreticalclass customersstandard is of style. trend-

sensitivitytherefordecision would be termedthrough their view of what is Brandswhichtransportstrendysportswearappealdedicatedcustomers who are trendsensitive. Trend frontrunners or supportersgenerallybuy or endure to repurchase their stylishclothes in shopswhich are extremelytrendy or fashionable. Omar (1999) highlighted that the shop/storeatmosphere was the onlyutmostvitalelement and in retail marketingtriumph and shopendurance. Affirmativefeatures of the shop, thatembraces shopposition, shopdesign, in-shopinducements, influencesbrand loyalty to certaindegree. Shop/storeposition and quantity of channels are vital in varyingcustomersshopping and buying patterns. If customersperceive the shop to be extremelyreachablein the course of their shopping trip and are contentfrom the shops collection and amenities, the customers mightformtrusty/loyallater. There are numerousbenefits to retailerswithloyal consumers. As specifiedvia Huddleston et al. (2004), consumerdevotion theretailers. canproducetheauspiciousoperational-cost Moreover, they to are six emphasized timesas smallcharge couldupsurge benefitto that compared their for

gainingfreshconsumerschargefive towithholdingprevailingconsumers. buyingexpenditure, which

Loyal-consumers

retailerscomparativelygainingfreshconsumers; they admitprice premiums and they possessconsumerdurability. Studyperformedvia Lin and Chang (2003) presented that the networkease of brandshasimportanteffect on purchasingbehavior. This refer to that the convenience to this product or brand in shop is vitalwhilebuyinglittleparticipationgoods. Customers wouldnt move to other shopsmerely to discover the brand. As an alternative, they wouldremain and selectsdifferentbrand(s).

2.6.6 Promotion Promotion is a marketing-mixelement,thatsasort of interactionalong-with the customers. Promotioncomprises the usage of advertisement, salespromotions, personal-selling and publicity. Advertising is thenonsubjectiveexhibition of dataundermass-mediaregarding a goods, brand, firm or shop. It extremelyimpactscustomerspictures, et al., 1996). This opinions and that or approachesin the direction ofgoods and brands, and sequentially, affects their buyingactions insights in (Evans demonstration promotion,particularlyvia todifferentbrands. 2.6.7 Service Quality A usualdescription of service quality is that the amenities/service mustmatchconsumersanticipations and content their desires and necessities (Gronroos, 1990). Service quality is a sort of personal-selling, and comprisesstraightcommunicationamong salesmen and prospectivepurchasers. Customersprefer to shop at explicitstoressince they adore the amenitiesdelivered and are guaranteed of somefacilityrights. The influence of salesmen and customerassociations wouldusuallyoutcome in enduringdirection of customersto the shop or brand. Belief in salesmenseems to connect to inclusiveinsights of the shopsservice quality, and consequences in the customerhavingcompletelycontentedby the shopeventually. Moreover, personalization (i.e. dependability, receptiveness, individualization and tangibles) considerablyeffectcustomersknowledge and assessment of amenities, and sequentially, movesbrand loyalty of the customers (To and Leung, 2001). advertisement, couldassistformingthoughts

customersnoticesandaidsdistinguishgoods

contrary

2.6.8 Advertising Overpoweringly, advertisingstudies have discovered that advertising is tooeffective in producingbrand equity. It had beenestablished that there is a affirmativeconnection of brand equity to advertisingexpenditures (Simon and Sullivan, (Ackerberg, 1993) 2003). and advertisingstrength in anessentialpart and in selectsknowledgeindicatorgoodsstandard brandselectionschemes

Advertisingperforms

accumulatingbrand-awarenessandformingpowerfulbrand-relationsYoo et al. (2000). Repeat advertising agendasupsurges the prospect that thebrand would be encompassed in the concern settingthatabridges the customersbrandchoice, forming it thepattern to selectbrand. Huge quantity of advertisement is thereforelinked to brand-awareness and effectivebrand-relationshipthattake to betterbrand equity. Celebrity-endorsement: Influencing the affirmation of goods viastars, as amarketing practice, hadtherenownedpast. Josiah Wedgwood, the well-known 18th century potter, was theinitiator in the skill of optingstars to his affirmations. After Queen Charlotte initiatedconsuming his goods, Wedgwood exploited his novelposition by denotingself as potter to his majesty (Dukcevich, 2004). Times impact later, could celeb be use in brand management Thiscourse or haddevelopedtheaccustomedsituation. Its acceptable, consequently, that this pulledviabrandadministrators. amountof mightincludeshowingsmaller auspiciousdata

choosilyinteractionattractingdata to the brand'sfocused-marketplace. This could be supposedto as triggering the celeb for advantages of the brand. Proof for the projectedinfluences of celebtriggering is deliveredvia Farrell et al. (2000), who established that the specializedtriumph of thecelebsupporter, if revealedvia the sanctionedgoodscompany, bettercustomerbrand-assessments of the sanctionedgoods (calculated as extrayields for sanctionedbrand). According to Farrell et al. (2000) argument, its proven via Seno and Lucas (2007) that maximum a celebsupporter is triggered, the

maximumsanctionedgoodsbrand image wouldaidout ofaffirmationthrough the star. 2.6.9 Distribution Distributionextent (the percentage of supplywhichtransportsthebrand) and deepness (a brandsportion of the entire quantity of SKUs in theclassificationwithintheshop) couldinfluencebrand-performance, however as togoods, theoretic and experientialproofs for these influences are insufficient. We suppose that upsurges in the extent and deepness as of the supplycausesadvancedquantity premiums

broaderhandinessenablescustomersskill to discover the brand (Bronnenberg, Mahajan, and Vanhonacker 2000). Two contendingprospects could be articulated for the impact of supplyextensivenessovermargin premiums. Initially, widersupply mightupsurge the option of in-brands price contrastover shops, usuallyknown as cherry-picking (Fox and Hoch 2003). This causes an augmentedprominenceover price plus an associatedreduction in the marginpremium. Comparatively, extensivesupplyindicatesproducerpromise towardbrand and possibly its triumph in the market.

2.7

PEER RECOMMENDATION AND BRAND EQUITY saying are more than believed in

Customers theproducers.

goodsdataformedthroughdifferentcustomers

thedataproducedvia to that

Additional,customer'sindividualknowledgeofthegoodsappearssignificant numerousapplicants who seestheseresponsevery trustworthy than

acquiredout of differentmeans Cheong, H. J., & Morrison M(2008). Peer recommendation is veryvital for first-classsectionautomobilepurchaser. These automobiles, having the premier price brace, purchaser of theautomobiledesire to be especiallycertain of its standard/classplusdifferentfacetsviaword-ofmouth of differentconsumers.

2.8

OTHER CONTEMPORARY FACTOR: THE DIGITAL REVOLUTION AND SOCIAL MEDIA BOOM

From 2000, we hadobservedthedigital revolution (Friedman 2006) planting the rise of online social communities, thatcurrently is the rapidlyrisinginternetprocess (Nielsen 2009). The differenceamongonline and offlinemeansvanishes as technologygulpsall the rest media (Mulhern 2009). Asper Nielsen digital, onlinemeans would in 2009 once moreoutdoentiredifferent media (Nielsen 2009). Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer commented that ofine marketing wouldentirely be online overa decade (Wall Street Journal 2008). This modestdeclarationimitates the massivealteration of marketing as it drifts from the print and transmissionuniverse to digital. Sellersappear to havecontained the exclusivefeatures of digitalmarketing communicatively. As opposite to equivalentsetups where the viewers couldjust be revealed, e.g. viaTVadvertisements, digital-media are preparedtoreact and inspiresresponseviaticking on of posters, observingoverblogs is etc. linking Anextremelytypicalcharacteristic presentcustomeractions

oversocial medialikeYouTube, Facebook, and Twitter. Dataallocation on social-networks has convertedto verystrong and dependablemedia of interaction now-a-days thatclarifies the thriving in viral campaignsalong the drivetoform and a powerfulword-of-mouthimpact context. in (Mairinger The these advertising 2009). 2008). Web socialgroups in is 2.0creates the canopy of social-media and definesmeanswhichinspireresponse operatorproduced networkingamongcustomerswhichoccurs 2004). A valuablephilosophy (Mulhern for and

considerablydescribing the sense and worthwhich we ascribe to brands (Holt digitalon The mediashouldincludesocial-networks socialassociations differentappearances

customerdevotesmuchperiodoversocial-mediaas comparative (Nielsen Online 2009), clarifying the prominence for brands to link the interaction. Consequently, firms are progressivelyendeavoring blog, to linktosocialnetworksoveronlinegroupsviaformingthebusiness linkingFacebook,

Twitter etc. Jenkins (2006) defines how customersjoin ingroups to

enormouslyprolongsatisfaction and brandsover what firms and media-firms creates. The digitization and networking of dataaltersadvertisinginteraction to theenormouslydiversecustomary of exercises for linkingcustomers and the brands (Mulhern 2009). Severalacademicssupports that the digitization of meanssignifies a modelchange in the past of marketing interactions. 2.9 INFLUENCE OF MARKETING-MIX RUDIMENTS ON BRAND-EQUITY

The essentialshape of crash of marketing-mixfundamentalsoverbrand-equity willincludethecombination of exteriorfactorsthat isfactors whose basecouldntbe signified in the shape(and a combination of exteriorelements whose bases are explicitto the design). Exteriorelements willincludeall of the inspected marketing-mix factors i.e. (1) price-point, (2) retail-outlet number, (3) distribution-concentration, (4) promotion, (5) cost deals, and (6) subsidy. It can be intense that theinitialpart of numericalinspection of collecteddata, using an analyticalcauseexamination, hadrevealed that factorssuch asdistributionpower, advertising, and helpssignifiesthe soleproblemthat can be cautiouslytitled as power of marketing effort. Along the essentialagenda, distributionfocus, promotional, and subsidy willhence be alleged as the exteriorfactors. The result of analyticalcharacteristicinspection will be presentedfully in following sections. Elements that can be perceived as brand-equity and ii) alignment willfundamentallyencompassi) Intermediatefactors brand-awareness are brand-image. the

Brand-equity extent could be observed as intermediatefactors in the context. basically exteriorfactorthatformsnumerousaddedexterioralternatives. This studyproposes that influences of marketing efforts are interferedthrough the extents of brand-equity. To examine this connotation, its vital to inspect and determine the relations amongmarketing-efforts and brand-equity scopes. This studyinspectedconsumersviewpoint on tenselectedmarketingrudimentswhich are (a) cost/price (b) shop/store (c) image, (d) distribution-power, (e)promotionalrate, (f) celebendorsement, (g) cost/price aid, (h)non-fiscalpromotions, (i) knowledgeassistance, (j) state of foundation and WOM (word-of-mouth) proposal. The selectedfacets doesnt

settleeachhit of advertisingactivities, but are agentsadequate to disclose the relationshipbordered by marketing-efforts and severalalignments of brandequity. Among the fouralignment of brand-equity, this

researchcalculatedsupposedbrilliance and brand-consciousnessbecause of the degree to be measured. Since the studycharacterized women-wear as first-class, fashionable, and low-cost and furthermore as consumers canadvanceover or later a short-ended adoption of women-wears to the greatercompletedstyle, brand-reliability cant account as analignments. Additionally, accordingto the study of Yoo and Donthu (2000), brand-involvement as a dividedalignment and combines brand association and awareness in the as kind of a countlessinstructionsthat isbrand-awareness brand-

associationgroundedover the notion of brand-awareness (Aaker and Alvarez del Blanco, 1995). The effects of each of thisstatedalignmentover brand-choice are verythoughtful in thestudy. Women-wearsretailers considers a heavyquantity of spendingoverpromotion in the main meansalsovia its producing of brand awareness and cultivation of image is usuallyproposed at producingbrand-loyalty and loyaltycrossways women-wearsranges. subjectthrough the Advertising and campaignexpendituresvia Fiscalsubsidy womenis an wearstraders are noteworthy, as the range they accommodate for selling is women-wearsbrands. for authoritativeadvertisingexercise women-wears,

deliveringrelationsconnecting brands and fashionable events, positions and superstarperformer. Sponsorship of brands by superstarspecialist and sports or gamefirms is anextravaluabletechnique, connecting the produce in thedirect-line to anartiste. TGI (BMRB Internationals Target Group Index) showed a cumulativedissemination for buying women sports-clothingamid the year 1998, and the year 2000. It arise to view to disparityviabusiness-observation of the market basically in the down, also the disseminationfiguresjustexhibits the portion of considerations who buyfew of these clothingsomeway. The system may be lengtheningregarding the entiremarketplaceinvasionessentially, as too

muchfemale and seniorpopulation isparticipating, as well the truth that usualspending isnot forminggreater. Although, through the study, it endeavored to perceive the deceptive as in opposite the actual to actual marketing-mix fundamentals in components thestudy, next, for and in twodiverseassumptionsinitially, it establishednot to befeasible to be in grasp of marketing-mix artificialadvertisingactivitiesdoes anadditionalunswervingtask

consumersattentionsetting than the reliablesystems. Genuine marketing means might not modify the customersdoingsexcludingconsumersrecognize it to exist. Olson, (1977) recommended that the un-prepossessed or authentic marketing activities hasfundamentallyanticipated in a diversemannerthroughconsumersbeginning from the declaredadvertisingdoings; authenticactions are formedviaconsumers to be expensive or inexpensive. Sawyer and Dickson, (1990) revealed that customers uneager to be in the psychologicalsituation of usable and genuineadvertisingactionssuch as price, still at point of trades, customers are projected to be accustomedthroughseveral marketing-mix fundamentalsthat are formedthroughmanybrand(s) (advertisingspending, data of the distributionchannels etc.). 2.10 SUMMARY In this research we exhibited the associations among the marketing efforts and brand equity. Precisely, we examined the interactive connection among five apparent marketing mix activities and brand equity and discovered certain significant inferences for the brand equity formation procedure. Brand loyalty, perceived value, and brand awareness are positively connected to brand equity. Since brand equity is entrenched to these extents, brand-management must invest on the existing power of the extents. Out of ten marketing mix components accounted, several have too powerful influence over brand equity since they positively influencedeachextentsmeasured for the research. Though, conflicting to what severalpriorresearchesstated, nation of source and price promotion didnt affectbrand equity for womenwears customers of United Kingdom. Advertising regularly isnt the producer of brand

equity though; word-of-mouth is the better factor of brand equity for frequentpurchasers. Yet againbecauseeveryextents of brand equityunderneath this research was established to positively influencebrand choice, its been suggested that the likelihood of customersselecting the ultimate brand is augmentedalong with a rise in the equity of the brand.

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY INTRODUCTION Research methodology is the implication of technicalprocess to severalissuesinconcern. Study/research is the blend of cognitive and knowledge, and its consideredto be aneffectivetacticof findingfacts. It aids not merely understanding the technicalanalysisof produceshowevereven procedure. Its thecoursevia which the authorresolves studyissuemethodicallyviasensiblyoptingseveralphases. It focusesoverdescribing and examiningentireapproaches, emphasesover their means and boundaries and explainsoutcomes and suppositions of entireprocesses. In prevailingmethodology, authordeliberatedentiretechniques, procedures, approach and methods. Which are: research design: inductive and deductive; research method: qualitative and quantitative; data collection: primary and secondary data; sampling design: probability and non-probability sampling; data analysis; ethical issue; pilot test; validity and reliability.

RESEARCH DESIGN

Research designmeansfewexclusivetactics and doctrines whereinthe study or research scheme is performed and finallycompleted (Birn, R., 2004). Its tooadjacently relatedtostudytechniquespluspresentstactics and doctrines for appropriatecloser of studytechniques for theparticularschemethat is provided by now. In modestterms, it presentsthecoursevia which aims and purposes of the study could be attainedskillfully and with ease. In maximumcircumstances, it comprisesselected methods and proceduresthat are linkedtoinformationgathering and examination of informationslikestudytools and sampling approach. Outcomeof anunfortunatestudy design is verypoor in ultimate report. Ineffectiveresearch cannot designs be coulddeliverunfinishedoutcomesforcertainresearchthat inductive and deductivemethod.

examinedprofoundly. There are two kinds of Research designs, which are:

Inductive approach Inductive approachtravelsout ofprecised to universalphilosophy and is groundedoverspecificinvestigationalpractice or experiments (Birn, R., 2004). Inductivereasoning, backs the deductions to certainamountmerelyplus the areas dontneeddeduction. This method is toousual in entiresorts of discipline whereinframeworks are produced and informations is are the collected to describeforthcomingnature. Inductive approach procedurefor

findingsthatfindsnoveltruths. It presentsfreshunderstandingever. Herein, the investigatoracquiresnoveldataandunderstandingthroughrealsurveillance procedure. Inductive reasoning is occupiedviaseveraldoings.

Deductive approach Deductive approach is the procedurethatmovesout ofuniversalnotions to theprecisedimplicationand usage (Birn, R., 2004). Herein, truth of subjectsdeliversassurance of fact of deduction. Its toousual in sense and arithmetic. It does not delivernoveldata or discoveries. It is thetype of confirmation procedure. It deliverspreviouslygenerateddata and utilizes it withinstudy scheme. It restsupondifferentmeans ofgathering data.

This research had nothing to do with testing the truth or uncovering the realism about a theory or scientific facts . Instead the research was focused to exploring the phenomenon in relation to Marketing mix elements influencing Brand equity and Brand Choice in UK Womenwears companies. So inductive was the approach of this research. Rightly said inductive approach is an approach of research wherein frameworks are produced and information are collected to describe forthcoming nature. In this inductive research information was collected both second hand and first hand. Both the information jointly enabled the researcher to achieve the research objectives as to study the character and consequence of Marketing-mix elements over brand-formation particularly regarding BrandEquity and Brand-Choice in UKs women-wears division; to probe the newest drifts in womens style-wears and elements influencing the marketing activities , similarly; to examine the influence of these marketing activities on manipulating consumers behaviors of womens in UK.

RESEARCH METHOD Research method is themethodthatdeliversdesirableduties to authorthroughthewell-matched and suitable methodology that couldrealizeentirewants and desires of the study (Creswell, 2003). It presentsnumeroustechniques to author and its significant that the authorperceiveeachscheme alongspecificrequirements or necessities. Research technique/method is characterized in two extensivesets,which are: qualitative and quantitativetechnique.

Quantitative method Quantitativestudytechnique is a review/examination of a recognizedissuethat is groundedoverchecking a specificphilosophythat is accountedviadigits and finallyexaminedthrough the support of arithmeticalmethods (Creswell, 2003). Herein,partakersdata is articulatedarithmetically or mathematically. The research purpose is to discover, whether prognosticoverviews of theprecisedphilosophies are correct or incurrent. Quantitative techniqueselectsquantitativemeansplusinvestigationaltechniques to reviewoverviews and supposition of thestudyproject. It evenaims overexamination and dimension of connectionamongnumerouscomponents (McMillan and Schumacher, 2006; Creswell, 2003). Herein this study, the authorattempts to restrict the procedure to general or quantifiablesetsthat are relevant to entiretopics (Winter, 2000). Thus, the rudimentaryrequirements of quantitativeauthors are organization of thecustomaryway and formation of severaltools. Qualitative method Qualitativestudy is a reviewthatfocusesoncomprehendingthehumanoid and communalissuesout ofnumerousviewpoints (Creswell, 2003). Its performed and systematized in thebehavioralbackgroundthatforms all-inclusive and multifacetedimage of a concernedprocedure. According toGolafashani (2003), qualitative studyat all timeselectsrealisticattitudethatcomprehendsprocedureaccording toperspectiveprecisedsituations. The data isnt groundedoverarithmeticalmodel. It usuallycomprises qualitative information. These informations are acquiredviatargetclusters, on-spotsurveillances and interviews that are descriptionand non-numerical. Qualitativeinformations are examinedviaperceivingoutline and subjects. This techniquehappens in ordinaryset. Quantificationprocedure isnot comprised in qualitativetechnique.

Mixed method Mixedstudytechniquemeanstheprocess whereinthe investigatorassociates or combinesqualitativeplusquantitativetechnique, nature, tactics and methods in a solitaryresearch (Creswell, 2003). It couldpresenttooinclusive and genuinesolution to eachstudyproblemsor issuesthatmovesaway fromrestraint of certaintactic. Whilst conducting this inductive research, the researcher had option to apply only qualitative, quantitative or both qualitative and quantitative methods. The application of qualitative method was imperative , but the researcher found it combining the qualitative and quantitative methods in simple terms. The qualitative method was applied to collect the second hand data, whereas the quantitative method was applied to collect the first hand data. The detail about the data collection is presented in the next section.

DATA COLLECTION Data/information is required to resolve entireissues alliedto thestudy. Whentechniques and schemesareconcluded, the authortravelsin the direction ofinformationgathering procedure to acquiresuitabledata. Its the procedure of obtainingvaluabledataviastudypartakerswith the help ofinquiry form, investigations etc. (O'Leary, Z., 2009). Whole of thestudy is baseduponinformation and authormustcollectbeneficialinformations to satisfyprcised research intention. To perform entiredeeds, the authorneedsto select a suitablemethod for evaluation, to gatherinformation and thusconfirm that the method is perfect or imperfect. There are two kinds of data/information, which are: primary data and secondary data.

Primary data Primary datameansthe infromationsthat are gatheredinitially and are newconsequently its a genuineinformation or discovery (O'Leary, Z., 2009). Primary informations are at all timegatheredvia theauthorthat is suitable to solvespecificstudyissues. The keyapproaches of gatheringprimary data are: interviews, assessments and inquiry form. These are freshdiscoveries. The data is straightlygatheredout ofpremisereviews. These informtions are sort

ofunprocessedresources. Primary datameans are genuinestuffsthat are acquiredduring thestudy. Theseinformations are formedhabituallyvia author or researcher who perceives the review or studyproject and latergathers it. Primary dataexhibitsnoveldata, freshfindings or genuinephilosophy. The charges of primary data are too much and evenis time consuming. It is generallycustomizedinformationhence, there isnot slightalterationchallengeconcerningprimary data.

Secondary data Secondary datameans the informationwhichisgathered,by now,through others for selfdrives or necessities (O'Leary, Z., 2009). Secondary datais passedvianumerousarithmetical procedures. Then theauthorjudges that theinformations are beneficial for a particularstudyscheme. Secondary data are gatheredviaprevailingmeanslikenews-papers, periodicals, journals, mails, web, public/private companies etc. The author couldexcerptsecondary dataout ofprintedmeans, unprintedmeans or presentevidence. Its at all timeaccessibleeconomically, quickly and easily. Firmswhereinsecondary information are transported and amassed cannotassessparticularneeds and precisedrequirements of presentstudy scheme. Consistently, changes or amendments towardsfactual requirements or necessities might not be dependable. And then the usefulness of secondary information would bemisplaced. However, whenequated to primaryinformation it cutsmoney and time, both.

In order to achieve the objectives and answer the research questions, in this inductive research both secondary and primary data was collected. The former represented the qualitative data and the later represented the quantitative data. Secondary data collection enabled the researcher to identify the research issues regarding following : Marketing mix focus; Brand equity focus; Brand choice focus; Marketing mix and brand equity; Marketing mix and brand choice ; Brand equity and consumer decision making ; Brand choice and consumer decision making ; Brand equity versus brand choice; Peer recommendation; and Advertising in brand equity and brand choice. Based on these issues first hand data was collected approaching Marketing/Brand Managers working in UK Womenwear companies. The survey was conducted with the help of a structured questionnaire consisting of 10 close-ended questions.

SAMPLING Samplingmeansarithmeticaldiscipline of wisdomregardingexistingpopulacethroughchoosing a demonstrativemodelout of thestudypopulace (Hackley, 2003). Through utilizingarithmeticalimplication, theauthor couldform a suppositionregardingentirepopulace who are existent and evenfacilitatesforecasting, how whole of the populacedo or deliberates a particularproblem. Sampling are of two kinds: probability sampling and nonprobability sampling. Sampling procedurecomprises sample volume and frameworkselection. Probability sampling Probability samplingmeans the procedure whereineachfellowout of the populace havealikefortuitous of partaking or assortment (Hackley, 2003). At fewmoments, it compriseshaphazardchoice. It resolvesthe issuesthat is alliedto how many or where. Probability sampling is essentially of four sorts: simple random, systematic, stratified and cluster sampling. In simple random sampling, eachelement hasidenticalprospect of getting selectedin sample. In systematic samplingeachkth element is chosen within an equivalentintermission. Its very methodicalsampling procedure. In stratified sampling, whole of thepopulace is parted to sections or sub-sections. Formerly samples are chosenout of everysection. In cluster sampling, populace is parted to groups. Formerlyneeded samples are chosenout of everygroup. Non-probability sampling

Non- probability sampling is completelydiverse from probability sampling (Hackley, 2003). Herein, there are fewfellows who possess no prospective of assortment. It doesnot comprisehaphazardassortment. It retortsregarding why and how. There are numerouskinds of non- probability sampling, which are: convenience, quota, judgment and snowball sampling. In convenience sampling, elements are selectedover the foundation of accessibility or ease. In quota samplingpopulace is parted to numerousshares and formerly samples are chosenout ofevery quotas. Judgment samplingmeansdecision of author. Author choosesa sample that he or she considers issuitable for thestudyproject. In snowball sampling, elements are chosenaccording toanticipatedfeatures and formerlychosenelementisprobed to chooseanother elementsalongsimilarfeatures. Through this, samples are selected. For selecting the sample, the researcher had to choose from a large number of Marketing/Brand Managers working in UK Womenwear companies. Initially the researcher was unknown as whom and how to be selected. This way the researcher had only option to select the sample using non-probability techniques. For this convenient method was used. The researcher, based on own convenience , selected 50 Marketing/Brand Managers working in UK Womenwear companies. Thus, the sample size was 50.

DATA ANALYSIS

In data analysis procedure, informationsthatarecollectedareset and outlinedas per theparticularsetup or certainstyle and formerlyinformationexamination is performedmostly to presententireinformationalong-withcertainsense (Smyth, 2008). In the beginning, gatheredinformationsareunprocessedmannerhoweveronce its organized in sensiblemanner or setup then it alters to processed data. Informationexamination and clarification is utmost vital and serioussupports of thestudyproject. These two facetsareverydelicatetherefore, it is required that authorby selfperformed both facetsbeneath a toodeliberate and cautiousmanagement. Through informationclarification procedure, author couldcome across the deductionout ofgatheredinformation. Study projectentirelyrestsovergatheredinformationhowever, it is toosignificant to view,and gatheredinformation isnot merelytheinformation/datagathering procedurehowever it mustdeliverfinestdata to theauthorduringalteredstudyactions. Hence, to fromgatheredinformationsensible and decent in functioning and behavior, informationexaminationperformsdecisive and significantpart. The keydrive of informationexamination procedure is that, it mustbe keenlyinclined to quantitative technique and in behavior it must be fruitfulalong-with a greatsense. Outcomethats acquiredout ofinformation/dataexamination procedure is connectedtosupposition of the study scheme.

Informationexamination proceduremoveviadiversephasespriorto coming acrossconcluding procedurelikeinformationtabularization, inspection, assessment etc. Tabularization procedureeverpresentsquantitativedescription. Data examinationcomprisesnumeroustasksthat are connected tooneanother toonarrowly and their aim is to abridgegatheredinformation and formerlyarrange theabridgedinformation in themannerthat couldsolveentireresearch problems.

Qualitative data was analysed in this research through content method where in accordance with the identified issues the concerned key propositions were discussed and further quantitative data was justified in relation to the proposition. The data collected addressed as what is Brand-equity and how is the Brand-equity formed or formulated; what are the functions and features of Brand-equity; what are the characters and consequence of Marketing mix elements over the formation of brand-equity; and what are the impacts of marketing activities or actions over the behavior of the customers. For the measurement of quantitative data simple statistical tools were used . the quantitative data was measured using Microsoft Excel software. ETHICAL ISSUE Ethicsis linkedtoentirehumanoidcommunicationthisevencompriseshumanoid study scheme(Australian Vice-Chancellors committee, 2007).Currently, ethicalproblems are tooessentialforperformingthestudyscheme. The keyaccountability of anauthor is to perform a studyprogramdeprived ofdisobeys, damage, awkwardness or abuse to thepartakers(Antle and Regehr, 2003). The partakers are explicitlyacknowledgedregarding the subject of thestudywherein they are partaking. If a fewpartakersdesire to quitfrom research they possess the privilege of the samedeprived ofaprotests. The author must not compelthepartaker(s)regardingno matter what, authorneeds to beauthentic and preserves the partakersdatasecure. Entire of thesefallswithin a decentexercise. Privacy and managingsignificantsubject of partakerout ofresearchcluster is evenlinkedtostudyethics. Partakersevenneed to admire the author. The rudimentarydoctrines of studyethics are: (i) Fairness/Justice, (ii) generosity/beneficence and (iii) independence and sovereignty (Antle and Regehr, 2003). The coreconcern of studyethicscopesalong-with the subsequentsubjectslike: secrecy, privacy, educatedaccord, falsifying or misapprehension of information. It is theresponsibility of author to safeguardpartakersindividuality. Theres varianceamongprivate and publicexistence of thepartakers. Educatedaccordmatter is coreportion of studyethics (Halse and Honey, 2005). Consequently, one coulddetermine that ethics is asignificantfacet of studyscheme.

The ethical issues were tackled in this research through various ways. No deviation was made in research plan. The research was conducted on time. The consent of participants was taken before conducting the survey. No attempt was made to show other authors work as own.

PILOT TEST Pilot testmeansthe procedurethatperformstheinitialstudy schemethattravelsviaentirestudytechniques and processesalongminor samples (Thomas, G., 2009). It includesprior-check of studytools or apparatuses. Pilottest is evenvaluable for checkingthesupposition or concept. Its done to acquireconfirmation that thestudyinstruments are appropriate to huge samples or it isnt. If pilot-testclarifies or determinesthat the process or approaches coulddo, formerly process and approaches of thesort-rangingcheck/test would be opted in hugemeasure. Pilot testing was conducted for selecting the sample. The target sample was grouped as per categories and sample size was decided as per the total number of sample. Even questions were as well scruitinised through pilot study.

VALIDITY and RELIABILITY Validitymeansrealevaluation. It evaluates what authordeliberates to evaluate (Wisker, G., 2008). It confirms studyresultsto beperfect or precisedreplication of conductingvaluationmeasurement. Its a sort of powervia which theauthor coulddeterminethestudysuggestions, expectations or deductionsto becorrect or incorrect. Studysuitability is concludedvia thestudy. Validity of studytools might be described as usefulness of thespecifictool to studyissue and how tools couldproperlyaccountstudyissues. Validity is toosignificantthenreliability, comparatively. Study couldtravelin reverse or incorrectcoursedeprived ofvalidity. Consequently, to retainstudy schemeincorrectpath, the authormustdescribeentirenotions in finest possiblemannerhence at the time ofevaluation no fault wouldbefall. Reliabilityisbiasedword. It cannot be evaluatedproperly in studyhoweverpresently there are numeroustoolsvia which reliability could be measured (Wisker, G., 2008). Its replication of study process, instruments or devices. If thestudyyieldssimilarconsequences or resultson every occasionalongalike process and samepopulaceat that time its recognized to be a reliable study. If the outcomes are muchalike, then reliability is too muchwithin thestudy.

No major validity and reliability issues was attached to this research, as the quantitative data collected was measured and analysed in simple number and percentage. Cumulative percentage was measured for avoiding any minor mistakes in measurement of percentage. SUMMARY

Research methodologycomprises of significantfacetsthat are selected to determinecorrectcourseforperforming study schemes. Its prominent for finishing thestudyschemeapplicably. The pealingstudycopesalong-with inductive research design. Quantitativetechniqueisoptedhere in thefollowing studysince it presentsarithmeticalresult that is simple to manage. However, authorevendefinedqualitativetechnique. It gatheredprimaryinformationsthateverpresentfresh and preciseddatalinkedtostudymatter and primaryinformation is evenutilized for inductivemethod. According to research populace, non-probabilitytechnique of samplingisutilized or selected. Author chosesamplesaccordingto his or her selfsuitability and verdict. Gathered informationisexamined in decentway. Study tools and utensils are checkedbeneathpilot testtechnique. Prevailing studyproject haveentireessentialethicswhichmanagescorrect and incorrectverdicts of the author. Finally, this section of the research methodology is a valid and dependable/reliableresearch project. This research had nothing to do with testing the truth or uncovering the realism about a theory or scientific facts . Instead the research was focused to exploring the phenomenon in relation to Marketing mix elements influencing Brand equity and Brand Choice in UK Womenwears companies. So inductive was the approach of this research.Whilst conducting this inductive research, the researcher had option to apply only qualitative, quantitative or both qualitative and quantitative methods. The application of qualitative method was imperative , but the researcher found it combining the qualitative and quantitative methods in simple terms. The qualitative method was applied to collect the second hand data, whereas the quantitative method was applied to collect the first hand data.

FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS

4.1 INTRODUCTION

The research has answered following research questions: what is Brand-equity and how is the Brand-equity formed or formulated; what are the functions and features of Brand-equity; what are the characters and consequence of Marketing mix elements over the formation of brand-equity; and what are the impacts of marketing activities or actions over the behavior of the customers. For achieving the aims and objectives of the research and answer the research questions, 50 Marketing/Brand Managers working in UK Womenwear companies were surveyed through questionnaire. In this chapter, data collected through 4.2 ANALYSIS OF FINDINGS

Marketing mix focus The reviewed literature in relation to marketing mix comes out with the key theme that not merely is the goods world growing whereas the customer world is dwindling, products and services too develop increasingly exchangeable to the

opinion that frequently its almost impossible to figure out the selling point founded overrun biased standard elements. The consequence of it is that price generally forms the conclusive element in buying judgments. Additional feature above the marketingbreakdown is the data excess; customers are swamped every-day with a great amount of data which they could merely abridge a too minor extent of it. This informationoverload is a cause that branding is developing too vital, since the customer is challenged along a massive supply with slight qualitative variance amongst the selections (Gray, 2004). The literature section of this research is formed including Brand-equity and its theories along with the function of the brand so as to have a comprehensive knowledge regarding the related philosophies and context provided by different researchers or academics. Subsequently, the brand equity perceived through the perspective of the customers and the firms are deliberated to

have a comprehensive framework of the brand equity. Precisely, in this research is examined the interactive connection among four marketing mix elements namely product, price, place, and promotion. In the wake of these key themes emerged

from the literature, the issue of investigation in this research was as what is marketing mix focus of UK based womens wear companies. The findings of the research in this context divulge that in the main product and promotion are the focused elements in marketing mix strategy of UK based womens wear companies(refer to table and figure 4.1).

Table 4.1: Marketing mix focus Variables Product Price Place Promotion Total No. of Respondents 19 9 4 18 50 Percentage of Respondents 38% 18% 8% 36% 100%

Figure 4.1: Marketing mix focus

36%

38% Product Price Place 8% 18% Promotion

The data display inthe above giventable manifests that for the respondents in greater majority (74% out of the total 50) they find that product and promotion are the focused elements in marketing mix strategyof their company; whereas the

remaining respondents (26%) they find that price and place are the focused elements in marketing mix strategy of their company. Taken as a whole, these data summarisethat in the mainproduct and promotion are the focused elements in marketing mix strategy of UK based womens wear companies.

Brand equity focus The reviewed literature in relation to brand equity comes out with the key theme that brand equity is a multifacetednotion (Aaker, 1996). It encompasses brandloyalty,brand-awareness, perceived-quality, brand-association, and othermitigation brand means. Several academics hadveryexpected corresponding magnitudes. While several authorshad predicted brand-loyaltyand brand-associations, Keller (2003) suggested for brand-knowledge, including brand-awarenessand brand-image. Deceptive standard could be defined as consumersince lined judgment about the products andenormous supremacy. Brand equity is extremely interned reassurance in the direction of re-purchasing a preferred stuff for consumption or service, repeatedly in the future periods. Devoted customers have recognized them-selfs to exhibitfurther optimistic response to the specific brandthan un-devoted customers. Brandparticipation might be defined as anything related with the rumination of the consumersdirectedto the brand, whilebrand-consciousness couldbewell-defined as comfort of reachto the brandname incustomers memory/mind (Chattopadhyay, Shivani and Krishnan, 2008). So, brand-equity does a main duty in the mannercustomerslearningthatreclaimed for forming the substitute. Information indulgence hits the inducement opportunities recognized and finally the selection are exploited in constructingcompletelikings. The broader explanation expands the accumulative notions inherent in e protective brand crash notionof brand-equityin the direction of anaddedcomprehensiveprogressthatpressures on the brands task crossways the activeconsumerlikingprocess.In the wake of these key themes emerged from the literature, the issue of investigation in this research was as what is brand equity focus of UK based womens wear companies. The findings of the

research in this context divulge thatin the mainquality and association are the focused elements in brand equity strategyof UK based womens wear companies(refer to table and figure 4.2).

Table 4.2: Brand equity focus No. of Percentage of Variables Respondents Respondents Awareness 10 20% Quality 18 36% Association 15 30% Others 7 14% Total 50 100%

Figure 4.2: Brand equity focus

14% 20%

Awareness 30% 36% Quality Association Others

The data display in the above given table manifests thatfor the respondents in majority (66% out of the total 50) they find that quality and association are the focused elements in brand equity strategy of their company; whereas the remaining respondents (34%) they find that awareness and others are the focused elements in brand equity summarisethat strategy of their company. Taken as a whole, these data

in the mainquality and association are the focused elements in

brand equity strategyof UK based womens wear companies.

Brand choice focus The reviewed literature in relation to brand choice comes out with the key theme that Information indulgence hits the inducement opportunities recognized and finally the selection are exploited in constructing complete likings. The broader explanation expands the accumulative notions inherent in e protective brand crash notion of brand-equityin the direction of an added comprehensive progress that pressures on the brands task crossways the active consumer liking process. Reverberating to Aakers notion, Yoo, and Lee (2000) structured the Brand-Equity construction evolution forms to systematically review the relationship in the mid of marketingeffort, brand-equity magnitude, and brand-equity. Therefore, the relationship among marketing efforts and brand-equity is mediated via these extents. This study reveals that no table relations exist among the ranges it-selfs. This framework offered a superb initials pot projected expected for additional examination over the association connecting marketing actions and brand-equity. Since the Brand-Equity notion process customs recognized by Yoo, Donthu and Lee (2000) is tailored and protracted in the study to determine the relationship of marketing actions via brand-equity and finally through brand-choice in womenwear marketplace, the connotation bordered via marketing events/action and brand-equity will too be lonely of the core focus of the study. In the wake of these key themes emerged from the literature, the issue of investigation in this research was as what is brand choicefocus of UK based womens wear companies. The findings of the research in this context divulge thatin the mainname and feature are the focused elements in brand choice strategy companies(refer to table and figure 4.3).
Table 4.3: Brand choice focus No. of Percentage of Variables Respondents Respondents Name 17 34% Feature 17 34% Style 9 18% Others 7 14% Total 50 100%

of UK based womens wear

Figure 4.3: Brand choice focus

14% 34% 18% Name Feature Style Others 34%

The data display in the above given table manifests thatfor the respondents in majority (68% out of the total 50) they find that name and feature are the focused elements in brand choice strategy of their company; whereas the remaining respondents (32%) they find that style and others are the focused elements in brand choice strategy of their company. Taken as a whole, these data

summarisethat in the mainname and feature are the focused elements in brand choice strategy of UK based womens wear companies.

Marketing mix and brand equity The reviewed literature in relation to marketing mix elements and brand equity comes out with the key theme those lots of company-grounded, market-enactment means of brand equity has been projected in the writings. Along with mutual means/measures like income, proceeds, and market-portion, other means comprise income premium (Ailawadi et al. 2003), pricepremium (e.g. Holbrook 1992; Randall, Ulrich, and Reibstein 1998; Sethuraman 2003), portion of class needs (e.g. Aaker 1996), etc. Especially, Ailawadi et al. (2003) deliberate lots of diverse conceivable pointers of the brands market-enactment/performance to form the situation for

revenuepremium as a suitable marketplace consequence means of brandequity. In their theoretic model, they clarify that the brands sales are the task of its even handedness plus its marketing mix and those of its rivals, and that brand equity is sequentially the occupation of the brands marketing mix , class features, and companies power. These marketplace forces relate at the same time, and marketplace enactment mean like proceeds and gains realized in competition symmetry. They even proposed that fiscal or monetary means like proceeds or gains are best pointers of brands enactment matched to means such as portion or price premium since the prior take into consideration activities in cost and size. In the wake of these key themes emerged from the literature, the issue of investigation in this research was as which marketing mix element has foremost effect on brand equity of UK based womens wear companies. The findings of the research in this context divulge that in the main product and promotion are the focused marketing mix elements in brand equity of UK based womens wear companies(refer to table and figure 44.).
Table 4.4: Marketing Mix and Brand Equity No. of Percentage of Variables Respondents Respondents Product 18 36% Price 10 20% Place 4 8% Promotion 18 36% Total 50 100%

Figure 4.4: Marketing mix and brand quity

Promotion, 36% Product, 36%

Price, 20% Place, 8%

The data display in the above table manifests thatfor the respondents in greater majority (72% out of the total 50) they find that product and promotion are the focused marketing mix elements in brand equity of their company; whereas the remaining respondents (28%) they find thatprice and place are the focused marketing mix elements in brand equity of their company. Taken as a whole, these data summarisethat in the mainproduct and promotion are the focused marketing

mix elements in brand equity of UK based womens wear companies.

Marketing mix and brand choice The reviewed literature in relation to marketing mix elements and brand choice comes out with the key theme that among the four alignment of brand-equity, this research calculated supposed brilliance and brand-consciousness because of the degree to be measured. Since the study characterized women-wear as first-class, fashionable, and low-cost and furthermore as consumers can advance over or later a short-ended adoption of women-wears to the greater completed style, brandreliability cant account as an alignments. Additionally, according to the study of Yoo and Donthu (2000), brand-involvement as a divided alignment and combines

brand association and awareness in the kind of a countless instructions that is brandawareness as brand-association grounded over the notion of brand-awareness (Aaker and Alvarez del Blanco, 1995). The effects of each of this stated alignment over brand-choice are very thoughtful in the study. The customer devotes much period over social-media as comparative (Nielsen Online 2009), clarifying the prominence for brands to link the interaction. Consequently, firms are progressively endeavoring to link to social-networks over online groups via forming the business blog, linking Facebook, Twitter etc. Jenkins (2006) defines how

customers join in groups to enormously prolong satisfaction and brands over what firms and media-firms creates. The digitization and networking of data alters advertising interaction to the enormously diverse customary of exercises for linking customers and the brands (Mulhern 2009). Several academics supports that the digitization of means signifies a model change in the past of marketinginteractions. In the wake of these key themes emerged from the literature, the issue of investigation in this research was as which marketing mix element has foremost effect on brand choice of UK based womens wear companies. The findings of the research in this context divulge that in the main product and price are the focused marketing mix elements in brand choice of UK based womens wear companies(refer to table and figure 4.5).
Table 4.5: Marketing Mix and Brand Choice No. of Percentage of Variables Respondents Respondents Product 17 34% Price 20 40% Place 4 8% Promotion 9 18% Total 50 100%

Figure 4.5: Marketing mix and brand choice

Promotion, 18% Product, 34% Place, 8%

Price, 40%

The data display in the above given table manifests thatfor the respondents in greater majority (74% out of the total 50) they find that product and price are the focused marketing mix elements in brand choice of their company; whereas the remaining respondents (26%) they find that place and promotion are the focused marketing mix elements in brand choice of their company. Taken as a whole, these data summarisethatin the mainproduct and price are the focused elements in brand choice of UK based womens wear companies. marketing mix

Brand equity and consumer decision making The reviewed literature in relation to marketing mix elements and brand choice comes out with the key theme that among the four alignment of brand-equity, this research calculated supposed brilliance and brand-consciousness because of the degree to be measured. Since the study characterized women-wear as first-class, fashionable, and low-cost and furthermore as consumers can advance over or later a short-ended adoption of women-wears to the greater completed style, brandreliability cant account as an alignments. Although, through the study, it endeavored to perceive the deceptive as in opposite to actual marketing-mix

components for two diverse assumptions initially, it established not to be feasible to be in grasp of the actual marketing-mix fundamentals in the study, next, and artificial advertising activities does an additional unswerving task in consumers attention setting than the reliable systems. The study merges the familiar kindsof Brand-Equity structure to perceive the link among marketing events and brandequity for women-wear in UK market. Brand-equity inheritances arise out of the prevailing consumer understanding which influences the manner goods are established and presented through consumers. It situates to describe that these comprehensions are supple and influences consumer preferences process and consequence, directly or indirectly. In the wake of these key themes emerged from the literature, the issue of investigation in this research was as how is brand equity role in influencing consumer decision makingfor UK based womens wear companies. The findings of the research in this context divulge thatbrand equity has highly effective role in influencing consumer decision making for UK based womens wear companies(refer to table and figure 4.6).

Table 4.6: Brand equity and consumer decision making No. of Percentage of Variables Respondents Respondents Highly effective 35 70% Average effective 15 30% Ineffective 0 0% Total 50 100%

Figure 4.6: Brand equity and customer decision making

Ineffective, 0% Average effective, 30%

Highly effective, 70%

The data display in the above given table manifests thatfor the respondents in majority (70% out of the total 50) they find that brand equity has highly effective role in influencing consumer decision making for their company; whereas the remaining respondents (30%) they find that brand equity has average effective role in influencing consumer decision making for their company. Taken as a whole, these data summarisethat brand equity has highly effective role in influencing consumer decision making forUK based womens wear companies.

Brand choice and consumer decision making The reviewed literature in relation to marketing mix elements and brand choice comes out with the key theme that since the Brand-Equity notion process customs recognized by Yoo, Donthu and Lee (2000) is tailored and protracted in the study to determine the relationship of marketing actions via brand-equity and finally through brand-choice in women-wear marketplace, the connotation bordered via marketing events/action and brand-equity will too be lonely of the core focus of the study. Customers prefer to shop at explicit stores since they adore the amenities

delivered and are guaranteed of some facility rights. The influence of salesmen and customer associations would usually outcome in enduring direction of customers to the shop or brand. Belief in salesmen seems to connect to inclusive insights of the shops service quality, and consequences in the customer having completely contented by the shop eventually. Moreover, personalization (i.e. dependability, receptiveness, individualization and tangibles) considerably effect customers knowledge and assessment of amenities, and sequentially, moves brand loyalty of the customers (To and Leung, 2001). Influencing the affirmation of goods via stars, as a marketing practice had the renowned past. Josiah Wedgwood, the well-known 18th century potter, was the initiator in the skill of opting stars to his affirmations. After Queen Charlotte initiated consuming his goods, Wedgwood exploited his novel position by denoting self as potter to his majesty (Dukcevich, 2004). Times later, celeb use in brandmanagement had developed the accustomed situation. Its acceptable, consequently, that this impact could be pulled via brand administrators. This course might include showing smaller amount of auspicious data or closely interaction attracting data to the brands focused-marketplace. In the wake of these key themes emerged from the literature, the issue of investigation in this research was as how is brand choice role in influencing consumer decision making for UK based womens wear companies. The findings of the research in this context divulge thatbrand choice has highly effective role in influencing consumer decision making forUK based womens wear companies(refer to table and figure 4.7).

Table 4.7: Brand choice and consumer decision making No. of Percentage of Variables Respondents Respondents Highly effective 32 64% Average effective 18 36% Ineffective 0 0% Total 50 100%

Figure 4.7: Brand choice and customer decision making

Ineffective, 0%

Average effective, 36%

Highly effective, 64%

The data display in the above given table manifests thatfor the respondents in majority (64% out of the total 50) they find that brand choice has highly effective role in influencing consumer decision makingfor their company; whereas the

remaining respondents (36%) they find that brand choice has average effective role in influencing consumer decision making for their company. Taken as a whole, these data summarisethat brandchoice has highly effective role in influencing consumer decision making for UK based womens wear companies.

Brand equity versus brand choice The reviewed literature in relation to brand equity comes out with the key theme that brand equity is a multifaceted notion (Aaker, 1996). It encompasses brandloyalty, brand-awareness, perceived-quality, brand-association, and other mitigation brand means. Several academics had very expected corresponding magnitudes. While several authors had predicted brand-loyalty and brand-associations, Keller (2003) suggested forbrand-knowledge, includingbrand-awareness and brand-image. Deceptive standard could be defined as consumer since lined judgment about the products and enormous supremacy. Brand equity is extremely interned reassurance

in the direction of re-purchasing a preferred stuff for consumption or service, repeatedly in the future periods. The reviewed literature in relation to brand choice comes out with the key theme that Information indulgence hits the inducement opportunities recognized and finally the selection are exploited in constructing complete likings. The broader explanation expands the accumulative notions inherent in e protective brand crash notion of brand-equity in the direction of an added comprehensive progress that pressures on the brands task crossways the active consumer liking process. Reverberating to Aakers notion, Yoo, and Lee (2000) structured the Brand-Equity construction evolution forms to systematically review the relationship in the mid of marketingeffort, brand-equity magnitude, and brandequity. Therefore, the relationship among marketing efforts and brand-equity is mediated via these extents. In the wake of these key themes emerged from the literature, the issue of investigation in this research was as whether brand equity or brand choice has comparatively more influence on consumer decision making for UK based womens wear companies. The findings of the research in this context divulge that brand equity has comparatively more influence on consumer decision making than brand choice for UK based womens wear companies(refer to table and figure 4.8).

Table 4.8: Brand equity Vs. Brand choice No. of Percentage of Variables Respondents Respondents Brand equity 31 62% Brand choice 19 38% Total 50 100%

Figure 4.8: Brand equity Vs. Brand choice

Brand choice, 38%

Brand equity, 62%

The data display in the above given table manifests thatfor the respondents in majority (62% out of the total 50) they find that brand equity has comparatively more influence on consumer decision making for their company for their company; whereas the remaining respondents (38%) they find that brand choice has

comparatively more influence on consumer decision making for their company for their company. Taken as a whole, these data summarise brand equity has

comparatively more influence on consumer decision making than brand choice forUK based womens wear companies. Peer recommendation The reviewed literature in relation to peer recommendation comes out with the key theme that upsurges in the extent and deepness of supplycausesadvancedquantity premiums as the broaderhandinessenablescustomersskill to discover the brand (Bronnenberg, Mahajan, and Vanhonacker 2000). Two contendingprospects could be articulated for the impact of supplyextensivenessovermargin premiums. Initially, widersupply mightupsurge the option of in-brands price contrastover shops, usuallyknown as cherry-picking (Fox and Hoch 2003). This causes an

augmentedprominenceover price plus an associatedreduction in the marginpremium. Comparatively, extensivesupplyindicatesproducerpromise toward brand

and possibly its triumph in the market. Customers saying are more believed in goodsdataformedthroughdifferentcustomers theproducers. Additional,customer'sindividualknowledgeofthegoodsappearssignificant to than thedataproducedvia

numerousapplicants who seesthe response every trustworthy than that acquired out of different means Cheong, H. J., & Morrison M(2008). Peer recommendation is very vital for first-classsection automobile purchaser. These automobiles, having the premier price brace, purchaser of theautomobiledesire to be especially certain of its standard/classplusdifferentfacetsviaword-of-mouth of differentconsumers. In the wake of these key themes emerged from the literature, the issue of investigation in this research was as whether peer recommendation is most effective in brand

equity and brand choice for marketing for UK based womens wear companies. The findings of the research in this context divulge that peer recommendation is most effective in brand equity and brand choice for UK based womens wear companies(refer to table and figure 4.9).

Yes No

Table 4.9: Peer recommendation No. of Percentage of Variables Respondents Respondents 37 74% 13 26% Total 50 100%

Figure 4.9: Peer recommendation

No, 26%

Yes, 74%

The data display in the above given table manifests thatfor the respondents in majority (74% out of the total 50) they find that peer recommendation is most effective in brand equity and brand choice for their companys marketing; whereas the remaining respondents (26%) they find that peer recommendation is not most effective in brand equity and brand choice for their companys marketing. Taken as a whole, these data summarise that peer recommendation is most effective in brand equity and brand choice for UK based womens wear companies.

Advertising in brand equity and brand choice The reviewed literature in relation to advertising in brand equity and brand choice comes out with the key theme that A valuable philosophy for advertising in digitalmedia should include social-networks and different appearances on social associations (Mulhern 2009). The customer devotes much period over social-media as comparative (Nielsen Online 2009), clarifying the prominence for brands to link the interaction. Consequently, firms are progressively endeavoring to link to socialnetworks over online groups via forming the business blog, linking Facebook, Twitter etc. Jenkins (2006) defines how customers join in groups to enormously prolong

satisfaction and brands over what firms and media-firms creates. The digitization and networking of data alters advertising interaction to the enormously diverse customary of exercises for linking customers and the brands (Mulhern 2009). Several academics supports that the digitization of means signifies a model change in the past of marketinginteractions. In the wake of these key themes emerged from the literature, the issue of investigation in this research was as advertising in brand equity and brand choice how effective is

for UK based womens wear

companies. The findings of the research in this context divulge that in most cases advertising is highly effective in brand equity and brand choice for marketing of UK based womens wear companies (refer to table and figure 4.10).
Table 4.10: Advertising in brand equity and brand choice No. of Percentage of Variables Respondents Respondents Highly effective 34 68% Average effective 16 32% Ineffective 0 0% Total 50 100%

Figure 4.10: Advertising in brand equity and brand choice

Ineffective, 0% Average effective, 32%

Highly effective, 68%

The data display in the above given table manifests thatfor the respondents in majority (68% out of the total 50) they find thatadvertising is highly effective in brand equity and brand choice for their companys marketing ; whereas the

remaining respondents (32%) they find that advertising is average effective in brand equity and brand choice for their companys marketing. Taken as a whole, these data summarise that in most cases advertising is highly effective in brand equity and brand choice for marketing of UK based womens wear companies. 4.3 SUMMARY

In the main product and promotion are the focused elements in marketing mix strategy of UK based womens wear companies.Quality and association are the focused elements in brand equity strategyof UK based womens wear companies.In the mainname and feature are the focused elements in brand choice strategy of UK based womens wear companies.Product and promotion are the focused marketing mix elements in brand equity of UK based womens wear companies.In the main product and price are the focused marketing mix elements in brand choice of UK based womens wear companies.Brand equity has highly effective role in influencing consumer decision making for UK based womens wear companies.Brand choice has highly effective role in influencing consumer decision making for UK based womens wear companies. Brand equity has comparatively more influence on consumer decision making than brand choice for UK based womens wear companies. Peer recommendation is most effective in brand equity and brand choice for UK based womens wear companies.In most cases advertising is highly effective in brand equity and brand choice for marketing ofUK based womens wear companies.

DISCUSSION

The findings of the research divulge that in the main product and promotion are the focused elements in marketing mix strategy of UK based womens wear

companies.The customer world is dwindling, products and services too develop increasingly exchangeable to the opinion that frequently its almost impossible to figure out the selling point founded overrun biased standard elements. The consequence of it is that price generally forms the conclusive element in buying judgments (Gray, 2004).The findings of the research divulge thatin the mainquality and association are the focused elements in brand equity strategyof UK based womens wear companies.Devoted customers have recognized them-selfs to exhibit further optimistic response to the specific brand than un-devoted customers. Brand participation might be defined as anything related with the rumination of the consumers directed to the brand, while brand-consciousness could be well-defined as comfort of reach to the brandname in customers memory/mind (Chattopadhyay, Shivani and Krishnan, 2008). The findings of the research divulge thatin the mainname and feature focused elements in brand choice strategy are the

of UK based womens wear

companies.Since the Brand-Equity notion process customs recognized by Yoo, Donthu and Lee (2000) is tailored and protracted in the study to determine the relationship of marketing actions via brand-equity and finally through brandchoice in women-wear marketplace.The findings of the research divulgethat in the main product and promotion are the focused marketing mix elements in brand

equity of UK based womens wear companies.Ailawadi et al. (2003) deliberate lots of diverse conceivable pointers of the brands market-enactment/performance to form the situation for revenuepremium as a suitable marketplace consequence means of brandequity. In their theoretic model, they clarify that the brands sales are the task of its even handedness plus its marketing mix and those of its rivals, and that brand

equity is sequentially the occupation of the brands marketing mix , class features, and companies power.

The findings of the research divulge that in the main product and price are the focused marketing mix elements in brand choice of UK based womens wear

companies.Jenkins (2006) defines how customers join in groups to enormously prolong satisfaction and brands over what firms and media-firms creates. The digitization and networking of data alters advertising interaction to the enormously diverse customary of exercises for linking customers and the brands (Mulhern 2009).The findings of the research divulge thatbrand equity has highly effective role in influencing consumer decision making for UK based womens wear companies.Although, through the study, it endeavored to perceive the deceptive as in opposite to actual marketing-mix components for two diverse assumptions initially, it established not to be feasible to be in grasp of the actual marketing-mix fundamentals in the study, next, and artificial advertising activities does an additional unswerving task in consumers attention setting than the reliable systems. The study merges the familiar kindsof Brand-Equity structure to perceive the link among marketing events and brand-equity for women-wear in UK market. The findings of the research divulge that brandchoice has highly effective role in influencing consumer decision making for UK based womens wear

companies.Personalization (i.e. dependability, receptiveness, individualization and tangibles) considerably effect customers knowledge and assessment of amenities, and sequentially, moves brand loyalty of the customers (To and Leung, 2001).The findings of the research divulge that brand equity has comparatively more influence on consumer decision making than brand choice for UK based womens wear companies. Reverberating to Aakers notion, Yoo, and Lee (2000) structured the Brand-Equity construction evolution forms to systematically review the relationship in the mid of marketingeffort, brand-equity magnitude, and brand-equity.

The findings of the research divulge that peer recommendation is most effective in brand equity and brand choice for UK based womens wear companies.Customers saying are more believed in goods data formed through different customers than the data produced via the producers. Additional, customer's individual knowledge of the goods appears significant to numerous applicants who sees the response every trustworthy than that acquired out of different means Cheong, and Morrison

(2008), where peer recommendation is very vital for first-class section automobile purchaser.The findings of the research divulge that in most cases advertising is highly effective in brand equity and brand choice for marketing of UK based

womens wear companies.Jenkins (2006) defines how customers join in groups to enormously prolong satisfaction and brands over what firms and media-firms creates. The digitization and networking of data alters advertising interaction to the enormously diverse customary of exercises for linking customers and the brands (Mulhern 2009).

CONCLUSION

6.1

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this research was to conduct an investigation of Marketing mix elements influencing Brand equity and Brand Choice in UK Womenwears companies. The research attempts to achieve following objectives: to study the character and consequence of Marketing-mix elements over brand-formation particularly regarding Brand-Equity and Brand-Choice in UKs women-wears division; to probe the newest drifts in womens style-wears and elements influencing the marketing

activities, similarly; to examine the influence of these marketing activities on manipulating consumers behaviors of womens in UK. The research has answered following research questions: what is Brand-equity and how is the Brand-equity formed or formulated; what are the functions and features of Brand-equity; what are the characters and consequence of Marketing mix elements over the formation of brand-equity; and what are the impacts of marketing activities or actions over the behavior of the customers. 6.2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

Firstly, the issue of investigation in this research was as what is marketing mix focus of UK based womens wear companies. The findings of the research in this context divulge that in the main product and promotion are the focused elements in marketing mix strategy of UK based womens wear companies. Further the issue of investigation in this research was as what is brand equity focus of UK based womens wear companies. The findings of the research in this context divulge thatin the mainquality and association are the focused elements in brand equity strategyof UK based womens wear companies. Next the issue of investigation in this research was as what is brand choice focus of UK based womens wear companies. The findings of the research in this context

divulge thatin the mainname and feature are the focused elements in brand choice strategy of UK based womens wear companies. Further the issue of investigation in this research was as which marketing mix element foremost effect on brand equity of UK has based womens wear companies. The findings of the research in this context divulge that in the main product and promotion are the focused marketing mix elements in brand equity of UK based womens wear companies. Besides the issue of investigation in this research was as which marketing mix element has foremost effect on brand choice of UK based womens wear companies. The findings of the research in this context divulge that in the main product and price are the focused marketing mix elements in brand choice of UK based womens wear companies.Further, the issue of investigation in this research was as how is brand equity role in influencing consumer decision making for UK based womens wear companies. The findings of the research in this context divulge thatbrand equity has highly effective role in influencing consumer decision making for UK based womens wear companies. In addition, the issue of investigation in this research was as how is brand choice role in influencing consumer decision making for UK based womens wear companies. The findings of the research in this context divulge that brandchoice has highly effective role in influencing consumer decision making for UK based womens wear companies. Further the issue of investigation in this research was as whether brand equity or brand choice has comparatively more influence on consumer decision making for UK based womens wear companies. The findings of the research in this context divulge that brand equity has comparatively more influence on consumer decision making than brand choice for UK based womens wear companies. The issue of investigation in this research was as whether peer recommendation is most effective in brand equity and brand choice for marketing for UK based

womens wear companies. The findings of the research in this context divulge that peer recommendation is most effective in brand equity and brand choice for UK

based womens wear companies.Further the issue of investigation in this research was as how effective is advertising in brand equity and brand choice for UK based womens wear companies. The findings of the research in this context divulge that in most cases advertising is highly effective in brand equity and brand choice for marketing of UK based womens wear companies. 6.3 RECOMMENDATIONS Brand equity has highly effective role in influencing consumer decision making for UK based womens wear companies, so the companies should carry on the focus on this strategy. Brand choice has highly effective role in influencing consumer decision making for UK based womens wear companies, so the companies should carry on the focus on this strategy. Peer recommendation is most effective in brand equity and brand choice for UK based womens wear companies, so the companies should carry on the focus on this strategy. Advertising is highly effective in brand equity and brand choice for marketing of UK based womens wear companies.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Aaker, D.A. (1991), Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of a BrandName, New York: The Free Press. Aaker, D.A. and Keller, K.L.(1990), Consumer Evaluations of Brand

Extensions,Journal of Marketing, 54, 1, pp. 27-41. Aaker, David. (1996). Building Strong Brands; The Free Press, Simon and Schuster Inc. Abraham, M. L. and Littrell, M. A. (1995) Consumers Conceptualization of Apparel Attributes Clothing and Textile Research Journal, 13: pp. 65-74. Ackerberg D (2003) Advertising, learning and consumer choice in experience good markets: A structural empirical examination, Int.Econ. Rev. 44: pp 1007 1040. Ailawadi, Kusum L., Donald R. Lehmann, and Scott Neslin.(2003); Revenue premium as an outcome measure of brand equity; J. Marketing. 67: 4: pp. 1-17. Ailawadiet. al., (2005), The Benefits of Promotion-Induced Stockpiling, Working Paper, Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth. Antle, B. J. and Regehr, C. (2003), Beyond Individual Rights and Freedoms: Metaethics, Oxford University Press, New York. Babbie, E. (2007), The practice of social research, 11th ed., Thomson Wadsworth, Belmont, CA. Barrett, J., Lye, A. and Venkateswarlu, P.(1999), Consumer Perceptions of Brand Extensions: Generalising Aaker& Kellers Model, Journal of

EmpiricalGeneralisations in Marketing Science, 4. Bharadwaj, S.G., R.P. Varadarajan and J. Fahy, (1993), Sustainable Competitive Advantage in Service Industries: A Conceptual Model and Research Proposition, Journal of Marketing, 57:4:, pp. 83-99.

Birn, R. (2004), The effective use of market research: how to drive and focus better business decisions, 4th Edition, Kogan Page, London, UK. Bloemer, J. M. M. and Kasper, H. D. P. (1995); The Complex Relationship between Consumer Satisfaction and Brand Loyalty; Journal of Economic Psychology, 16:pp.311-329 Bronnenberg, Bart J., Vijay Mahajan, and Wilfried R. Vanhonacker (2000), The Emergence of Market Structure in New Repeat-Purchase Categories: The Interplay of Market Share and Retailer Distribution, Journal of Marketing Research, 37 :pp 1631. Cadogan, J. W. and Foster, B. D. (2000) Relationship Selling and Customer Loyalty: An Empirical Investigation, Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 18: pp. 185-199. Cheong, H. J., & Morrison M. (2008).Consumers' Reliance on Product Information and Recommendations Found in UGC.Journal of Interactive Advertising.8 :2 Collis, J. and Hussey, R. (2003), Business Research: a practical guide for undergraduate and postgraduate students, 2ndEdition,Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK. Creswell, J. W. (2003), Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches, 2nd Edition, Sage Publications, London. Crouch, S. and Housden, M. (2003), Marketing research for managers, 3rd Edition, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK. Dalrymple& Parsons, (2000), Basic Marketing Management, 2nd Edition, Wiley, NY. Dickson, P R and Sawyer, A G (1990), The Price Knowledgeand Search of Supermarket Shopper, Journal of Marketing,54, 3, pp.43-53. Dukcevich D (2004). Forbes most influential businessmen: Jossiah Wedgwood, [online] retrieved on 17th-nov-2011 from; www.forbes.com Erdem, et.al., (2001). Brand equity as a signaling phenomenon. J. Consumer Psych. 7:2: pp. 131-157

Erdem, T., Joffre, S., Susan, B.,Dipankar, C., Jean Noel, K.,Micheal, K., Roberts,J.,Steenkamp, Jan-Benedict E M and Zettelmeyer, F. (1999). Brand Equity, Consumer Learning andChoice, Marketing Letters, 10, 3, pp.301-318. Evans et al., (1996) Applied Consumer Behavior. Addison-Wesley: Harlow. Farrell KA, Karels GV, Monfort KW, McClatchey CA (2000). "Celebrity performance and endorsement value: the case of Tiger Woods", Manage. Finance 26:7: pp.1-15. Feldwick, P. (1996), Do We Really Need Brand Equity?,Journal of BrandManagement, 4, 1, pp. 9-28. Foekens, Eijte W., Peter S.H. Leeflang, and Dick R. Wittink (1999), Varying Parameter Models to Accommodate Dynamic Promotion Effects, Journal of Econometrics, 89: (March/April): pp. 249268. Fox, Edward and Stephen J. Hoch (2003), Cherry Picking, Working Paper, University of Pennsylvania. Frings, G. S. (2005) Fashion: From Concept to Consumer (8th Ed.). Pearson/Prentice Hall: New Jersey Gronroos, C. (1990) Service Management and Marketing. Lexington Books: Lexington. Guire, S.M. and Pritts, R. (2007), Different Methods of Sampling, Routledge, USA. Gustavsson, B. (Ed.). (2007), The principles of knowledge creation: Research methods in the social sciences, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA. Hackley, C. (2003), Doing research projects in marketing, management and consumer research,Routledge, London. Hoffman, N.P., 2000, An Examination of the Sustainable Competitive Advantage Concept: Past, Present, and Future, Academy of Marketing Science Review, [online] retrieved on 17th-nov-2011 from; http://www.amsreview.org/articles/hoffman04-2000.pdf.

Holbrook, Morris B. 1992. Product quality, attributes, and brand names as determinants of price: The case of consumer electronics. Marketing Lett. 3:1:pp. 71-83. Huang, J. (2009), Collaborative Logic Programming Via Deductive-Inductive Resolution, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Huddleston, P., Whipple, J. and Van Auken, A. (2004) Food Store Loyalty: Application of a Consumer Loyalty Framework, Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 12: pp.213-230. Keller, K. L. (2003) Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring and Managing Brand Equity. Prentice Hall: New Jersey. Keller, K.L. (1993), Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing CustomerBasedBrand Equity, Journal of Marketing, 57(1), pp. 1-22. Keller, K.L. (1998), Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring, and ManagingBrand Equity, Prentice Hall Inc., New Jersey. Keller, K.L. and Aaker, D.A.(1992), The Effects of Sequential Introduction ofBrand Extensions, Journal of Marketing Research, 29, 1, pp. 35-50. Keller, Kevin L. (2003). Strategic Brand Management, Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity. 2nd Ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey. Kerin, R. A., Hartley, S.W., Berkowitz, E.N. and Rudelius, W. (2006),Marketing, 8th edition, McGraw-Hill Irwin, Boston. Kline, R.B. (1998), Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, The Guilford Press, New York. Kotler, P. (1999),Kotler on Marketing,The Free Press, New York. Kotler, P. and Armstrong, G. (2008),Principles of Marketing, 12th edition, Prentice Hall Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ.

Kotler, P. and Keller, K.L. (2006),Marketing Management, 12th edition, Prentice Hall Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ. Kumar, R. (2005), Research methodology: a step by step guide for beginners, 2nd ed., Sage Publications, London. Lane, V. and Jacobson, R.(1995), Stock Market Reactions to Brand

ExtensionAnnouncements: The Effects of Brand Attitude and Familiarity, Journal ofMarketing, 59, 1, pp. 63-77. Lau, M. M., Chang, M. S., Moon, K. and Liu, W. S. (2006) The Brand Loyalty of Sportswear in Hong Kong, Journal of Textile and Apparel, Technology and Management, 5, pp.1-13. Loken, B. and John, D.R. (1993), Diluting Brand Beliefs: When Do BrandExtensions Have a Negative Impact, Journal of Marketing, 57, 3, pp. 71-84. McCarthy, E. J. (1960),Basic Marketing, Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, IL. Mela, C. et.al., (1997), The Long-term Impact of Promotion and Advertising on Consumer Brand Choice, Journal of Marketing Research,34 :May:, pp.248 261. Newman, A.J. and Patel, D. (2004),The Marketing Direction of Two Fashion Retailers,European Journal ofMarketing, 38, 7, pp. 770-789. O'Leary, Z. (2009), The essential guide to doing your research project, 2nd Edition, Sage Publications, London. Olson, J. C. (1977). Price as an Informational Cue: Effectson Product Evaluations, in Woodside, Arch; Seth,Jagdish N and Bennett, Peter D (Eds.), Consumer and IndustrialBuying Behavior, Elsevier, New York,pp.267-286. Omar, O. E. (1999) Retail Marketing. Pearson Education: Harlow. Pauwels, Koen (2004), How Dynamic Consumer Response, Competitor Response, Company Support, and Company Inertia Shape Long-Term Marketing Effectiveness, Marketing Science, 23:3:pp. 596-610.

Pauwels, Koen, Dominique M. Hanssens, and S. Siddarth (2002), The Long-term Effects of Price Promotions on Category Incidence, Brand choice, and Purchase Quantity, Journal of Marketing Research, 39 :Nov: pp.421439. Pitta, D.A. and Katsanis, L.P. (1995), Understanding Brand Equity for SuccessfulBrand Extension, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 12(4), pp. 51-64. Randall, Taylor, Karl Ulrich, and David Reibstein. 1998. Brand equity and vertical product line extent. Marketing Sci.. 17:4: 356-379. Reichheld, F. F. and Sasser, W. E. Jr. (1990) Zero Defections: Quality Comes to Services, Harvard Business Review, pp.105-111. Russell, R. S. and Taylor, B. W. (2006) Operation Management: Quality and Competitiveness in a Global Environment (5th Ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: River Street. Saunders, M. (2007), Research methods for business students, 4th ed., Pearson Education Limited, Essex, England. Seno, D. and Lukas, B. A. (2007), The equity effect of product endorsement by celebrities: a conceptual framework from a co-branding perspective, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 41:No. : pp. 121-134. Simon, C.J. and M.W. Sullivan, 1993, The Measurement and Determinants of Brand Equity: A Financial Approach, Marketing Science, 12:1:, pp. 28-52. Simon, C.J. and Sullivan, M.W. (1993), The Measurement and Determinants

ofBrand Equity: A Financial Approach, Marketing Science, 12, 1, pp. 28-52. Smith, D.C. and Park, C.W. (1992), The Effects of Brand Extensions on MarketShare and Advertising Efficiency, Journal of Marketing Research, 29, 3, pp. 296313. Smyth, T. (2008), The Psychology thesis: research and coursework, Palgrave Macmillan, New York. Thomas, G. (2009), How to do your research project: a guide for students in education and applied social sciences, Sage Publications, London.

To, C. K. M., and Leung, C. S. (2001) Service-enhanced Manufacturing: Study of Perceived Service Quality of Apparel Manufacturers, Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 5:pp. 313-323. Trout, J. (2005), Branding Cant Exist Without Positioning, Advertising Age, 76, 11, p. 28. Wisker, G. (2008), The postgraduate research handbook: succeed with your MA, MPhil, EdD and PhD, 2nd Edition, Palgrave Macmillan, New York. Yoo, B. et.al., (2001), Developing and Validating a Multidimensional Consumerbased Brand Equity Scale, Journal of Business Research, 52:1: pp. 1-14. Yoo, B., Donthu, N. and Lee, S.(2000), An Examination of Selected Marketing MixElements and Brand Equity, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28, 2, pp.195-211.

E-sources
www.brandchannel.com; Brand loyalty (2006), *online+ retrieved on 17th-nov-2011 from; http://www.brandchannel.com.

Chattopadhyay, T; Shivani, S and Krishnan, M (2008).Approaches Towards Measuring Brand Equity, Oxford Business and Economics Journal, June. [Online] viewed on 15 Oct., 2011 from

http://www.gcbe.us/2008_OBEC/data/Tanmay%20Chattopadhyay,%20Shrad ha%20Shivani,%20Mahesh%20Krishnan.doc

Hoffman, N.P. (2000), An Examination of the Sustainable Competitive Advantage Concept: Past, Present, and Future, Academy of Marketing Science Review, 2000, 4. [Online] viewed on 15th October, 2011 from

http://www.amsreview.org/articles/hoffman04-2000.pdf.

Pidwirny, M. (2006), TheHypothetico-Deductive Method, Fundamentals of Physical Geography, 2nd Edition. [Online] viewed on 16 Oct., 2011 from http://www.physicalgeography.net/fundamentals/3b.html

Appendix

QUESTIONNAIRE

1.

Marketing mix focus of your company is on? Product [ Place [ ] ] Price [ Promotion[ ] ]

2.

Brand equity focus of your company is on? Awareness[ Association[ ] ] Quality[ Others [ ] ]

3.

Brand choice focus of your company is on? Name [ Style [ ] ] Feature [ Others [ ] ]

4.

Which marketing mix element has foremost effect on brand equity of your firm? Product [ Place [ ] ] Price [ ] ]

Promotion [

5.

Which marketing mix element has foremost effect on brand choice of your firm? Product [ Place [ ] ] Price [ ] ]

Promotion [

6.

How is brand equity role in influencing consumer decision making for your company? Highly effective[ ineffective [ ] ] Average effective[ ]

7.

How is brand choice role in influencing consumer decision making for your company? Highly effective [ ineffective [ ] ] Average effective [ ]

8.

Which has comparatively more influence on consumer decision making for your company? Brand equity [ ] Brand choice [ ]

9.

Do you find that peer recommendation is most effective in brand equity and brand choice for your companys marketing? Yes[ No[ ] ]

10.

How effective is advertising in brand equity and brand choice for your companys marketing? Highly effective [ ineffective [ ] ] Average effective [ ]