Metropolis in negative

The most absurd view any political group can have at this time is racism: the
belief that groups can be measured in terms of racial or genetic history of
evolutionary progress, terms. It affects the sensibility of equality among all
peoples, but it also goes against the "individualism" that is at the core of our
convenience-based, democratic, egalitarian society.

Equilibrium

No two people are equal in any way, and no group is equal to any other. Each has
developed differently and from different sources, and there is no way to make
these groups equal except by standardizing them to a lowest common denominator,
such as liking fatty, sugary foods and being immobile in front of televisions. To
prevent globalism, the single most important weapon possible is globalism, in
which one's ethnicity, culture and history become reasons for staying unique in a
world of conformists. So far, no race has disclaimed racism without promptly
committing genetic and cultural suicide.
Capitalism

currently benefits to the social, industrial and political infrastructure which

profit from humankind's lack of direction. Consequently, evolution is demonized,
despite its inherent tendency to focus more on realistic goals than the fear of
negativity that generates mass hysteria, ignorance and ineptitude and,
consequently, corporate logic
In our history modern government is combined of social, industrial and religious
influences which developed among those who could not succeed in the first
centralized societies, which designed competing autocracies. Political atmosphere
produces dissidents who design the system opposition to an individual, replacing
collective values with political mass appeal known as religion. With the advent
of technology, the industrial revolution converted societies into national states
which regulated profit activity, forming the basis for international trading and
politics. Societies in which individuals are guaranteed evolutionary success for
excellence thrived, in turn shaping the populations within them.
Effects
Although having succeeded technologically, we have failed to maintain a society
based on values, or which respects our environment, preferring instead an
atmosphere of conformity, consumer consciousness and what is a safe lack of
conflict. The result is stupefying social taboo and an inability to conceive and
execute long-term plans.
A desensitized and dystopian society does not agree on common goals, and
individuals worry about their own convenience only. Consequently the
responsibility falls on its leaders, who are busy seeking profit. This causes
massive environmental damage, social decay, and a fundamental boredom and misery
inhibit daily tasks. Further, society seems to be self-consuming.
Considering the needs of society as a whole eliminating the short-sightedness and
wasted time spent pursuing irrelevant goals, allowing the individual to first
fulfill his or her obligations to the state and secondarily to possibly tangential
needs shows people as we are, a part of a much larger system. This appreciation
in turn leads to respect for the natural world as it exists and for behaviors that
are more "natural" in their appreciation of structure and context.
Within this new worldview would be a corrosion of conformity, in which there are
few radicals and terrorists with malicious intentions, therefore no expectation of
"fairness" from nature. The function of nature would be understood and described,
and mythologized appropriately for popular understanding.
Within each race there should be tolerance for all range of intellectual activity,
so long as it is experimental and does not attempt to work as a virus upon the
population as a whole.
Between generations, learning is passed on in tradition, and it is this
accumulated
Tradition shapes cultural and social expectations in the character of people by
their actions and the values they prioritize. Society is more important than
stated system of government, current philosophical models or sentiment of the
press, and momentary influences like favorite authors, actors or politicians. Its
cultural origins predate existence on earth
Traditional values are the cultural focus of a civilization as part of order or
absolute power. If the civilization has multiple cultures within it, these should
be seen as separated to avoid forming their divergent values and producing a
synthetic hybrid. Further, traditions should not be censored by the convenient
opinions of the time, but should be considered as having proven their own value
over many repeated tests.
In retrospect one may infer that this is a series of choices made from options
facilitated by an external political/economic atmosphere, in a healthier future
view perhaps the individual can be seen as someone taming the experience of life
itself, not its conclusions or monetary symbolizations. The heroic stature of our
ancestors, if resurrected in a cultural capacity, will give individuals the
stimulus/incentive to do what they must do to be satisfied: create a frontier and
conquer it.
This eliminates a dependence on social approval (“hero worship”) and downplays the
influence of social prestige, money and novelty in one's life; outside of the
simple functions of maintaining survival and aiding the community incrementally.
We are compelled by tradition to seek a worthy accomplishment for our lives. For
many this includes the everyday tasks of having families, businesses, and friends.
Clarity-
I refer to ethical standards of my kind, not restrictive or constraint-based rule
sets, but ones which requires innovation and motivation which is not inspired by
any specific stimulus, but the vast experience of life itself. The student is
removed from a position where he or she can come to bad choices, and select
reasonable compromises, and is placed into a situation where a choice must be
conceived, designed and executed in order to be made.
Despite this seeming daunting to someone, it is derived from an essential
principle of life and evolution itself, which is competition between that which is
functional and that which is less than exemplary. When there are no longer easy
socially-approved ways to compete in which the rewards confirm evolutionary
success, the individual is forced to discover meaning or be content with an
awareness of his or her role as a supporting event.
The lack of focus on educational depth, objectivity and flexibility has made
democracy and other nation’s places of the obedient, demoralized and voters.
Having no critical skills, this average person is overwhelmed when facing
political questions or a massive media establishment using immoral sentiment to
sway them in convenient directions. In any system of government this person is at
a disadvantage, and by participating in any fashion puts his or her civilization
at a disadvantage.
Any society that makes education and intelligence priorities for their
consideration of success, by the genetic process of that mode of value, begins
refining its population to be more intelligent. Societies that do this for
thousands of years produce individuals of high intelligence. There are two parts
to physical aptitude: raw ability and the shaping of it to produce intentional
talent.
Political ties
It is unwise to allow those who are potentially your enemies to broadcast constant
propaganda into the minds of your citizens. Since commerce has no mentality, it
should not dominate the airwaves and publications; therefore, in any new society
which will last, the media will succumb to at least partial control by cultural
factors. While media establishments have been working to break this down for years
as it exists from tradition, they have been motivated solely by financial gain and
thus are unlikely to promote anything as a long-term idea except that which
creates for them more of an audience.
There are two issues with financial gain. First, having such as the ideological
highest value of a civilization is insane; this however is the case with both
capitalism and socialism, which make some regulation of money the fulcrum of goals
in their civilization. This prioritization creates unregulated self-interest which
amounts to philosophically-justified theft.
Second, there is the question of the monetary base of an economy, and how to
estimate the value of that economy to show the amount of worth the system can
support. In this kind of foundation, there are two different choices: material-
backed finance (supply) or devious economic underwriting (demand). The latter
functions only because we believe it to do so, and that the former is
inappropriate for the size of a global economy, supporting an economic monetary
basis calculated from the total value added to raw materials or services in their
processing by the economy.
Those who held beliefs which were openly against the state, such as those of
prisoners, would be sent to the appropriate location for which their beliefs would
be desired. If we’re cleared of criminal belief, societies could rebuild according
to their traditional values, provided that they could resurrect enough of their
strength to have it compete with others.
In this same mental frame, many people who are of a useless or criminal mindset
will be ejected from the population. We don't care whether or not they're innocent
of one specific crime, but recognize a pattern of criminality or worthlessness and
would like it to occur elsewhere.
All decision making in government, education, law and science will be made on the
assumption of materialism for our people, and there is no duality in which things
are purer, in our survival. Until the point in time where we can objectively look
into a dualistic space and determine natural laws for its operation, any
accusation about it is superstition and carries the dangers of that faculty,
namely the attribution of any arbitrary or profiteering actions to the will of an
idealistic race.
The rampant destruction of our natural environment must be reversed and a future
equilibrium between humans and nature must be found. To be specific, environmental
destruction is all of the following:
1. Alteration of natural resources (water, air, soil, space) with chemicals or
material patterns not found in these areas in their natural state.
2. Destruction of animal populations, including genocide and habitat destruction
of those species to promote the stronger and demote the weaker.
3. Over colonization and overconsumption of space on our planet, thereby excluding
many species from the ecological niche they need to live, interact and breed.
4. Abandonment of trash, equipment, buildings and vehicles across the planet's
surface and the production of massive landfills in which mixed, non-recycled trash
and equipment decay, leaking pollutants into the surrounding environment.

Technology is to be used sensibly. Capitalism produces a convenience culture that

distributes technology too broadly and too frequent to be useful; underdeveloped
recycling, waste containment and RF pollution causes dangers to enter the
environment. Technology also facilitates overpopulation and an extension of the
lives of those who are useless, thus causing further land and resource consumption
unnecessarily. Technology should be used as a tool, and not assumed as natural
part of life.