You are on page 1of 15

Chemical Engineering Science 60 (2005) 5880 5894 www.elsevier.


Process intensication in trickle-bed reactors

K.D.P. Nigama, , F. Larachib,1
a Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi Hauz Khas, New Delhi-110016, India b Department of Chemical Engineering, Laval University, Qubec, Canada G1K 7P4

Received 4 March 2005; received in revised form 15 April 2005; accepted 18 April 2005 Available online 1 July 2005

Abstract Process intensication (PI) is the strategy of making signicant reductions in the size of a chemical plant in order to achieve a given production objective. Innovations in catalytic reactors, which constitute the heart of such process technologies, are often the preferred starting point. Trickle-bed reactors are multifunctional reactive systems (catalysts, reactors, etc.), and allow a unique way of achieving PI in the chemical process and rening industry. In this millennium, process intensication in trickle-bed reactors is essential to meet the ultra low specication of the transportation fuel. The process intensication by operating at elevated pressure and temperature, and better understanding of ow behavior (which also helps for better design and scaleup), inducing pulse and operating in countercurrent mode is discussed here. Recommendations have been made for the future research in this area. 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Trickle bed; Process intensication; Induced pulsing; Wetting; High pressure and temperature; Filtration; Articial gravity; Structured packing

1. Introduction Trickle-bed reactors (TBRs) are generally xed bed catalytic reactors in which gas and liquid ow in cocurrent downward mode. The main application of TBR lies in the petroleum rening industry, more specically in hydroprocessing. Excellent reviews on trickle-bed reactors can be found in Ng and Chu (1987), Gianetto and Specchia (1992), Saroha and Nigam (1996), Al-Dahhan et al. (1997) and Dudukovic et al. (2002). The current status in trickle-bed reactors with respect to hydrodynamics and its effect on process intensication has been discussed. The development over the last 10 years has been mainly targeted in this review. The different hydrodynamic, mass transfer and heat transfer parameters on the performance of TBR are shown in Fig. 1. The drive to reduce air pollution has caused a myriad
Corresponding author. Tel.: +91 11 659 1021; fax: +91 11 658 1120.

E-mail addresses:, (K.D.P. Nigam). 1 Present address : Total, Centre Technique de Lyon, Chemin de la Lne - BP32, 69 492 Pierre, Bnite, cdex, France. 0009-2509/$ - see front matter doi:10.1016/j.ces.2005.04.061 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

of new and proposed sulfur specications. The restriction on impurities (mainly sulfur) in transportation fuel is going to be more stringent. The lower the specication of transport fuel, the tougher it gets. An integrated approach (catalyst selection, reactor design, process conguration) will be able to lead this situation. The process intensication will help to cope up the situation in addition to development of catalyst. Process intensication can be done by revamping the existing unit of TBR or a new unit of TBR with higher severed operating condition or installing alternative types of TBR. Though there is a lot of improvement on understanding the behavior of TBR, still it needs further progress to cope up with the present situation. Wettability of the catalyst has been explained based on contact angle of the liquid on the surface of porous particle as alternating patches of saturated pore and solid surface. The hysteresis behavior of hydrodynamics using this concept has also been explained. Recent studies have demonstrated reactor performance improvement over the optimal steady state under forced time-varying liquid ow rates. In this mode of operation, the bed is periodically ushed with liquid, while the gas phase is

K.D.P. Nigam, F. Larachi / Chemical Engineering Science 60 (2005) 5880 5894


2. Trickle beds at elevated temperature and pressure Trickle-bed reactors are operated at high pressures up to about 2030 MPa in order to slow down catalyst deactivation, improve the solubility of the gaseous reactant, attain high conversion and achieve better heat transfer. Kinetics and/or thermodynamics of reactions conducted in TBRs require high temperatures, which in turn increase gas expansion and impede the gaseous reactant from dissolving sufciently into the liquid. Elevated pressure acts against it and helps to improve the solubility. Effect of operating pressure on different hydrodynamic parameters (pressure drop, liquid holdup, and wetting efciency) is important for designing and scaling up purpose. The main reason behind changing the values of hydrodynamic parameters with the increase of operating pressure lies on the energy dissipation. The energy dissipation is due to the resisting frictional forces at the packing surface and the driving forces on liquid ow. The driving forces consist of the pressure gradient, the gasliquid interfacial drag and the gravitational force. A simple overall force balance on the gas phase shows that the pressure gradient is proportional to the gasliquid interfacial drag. The pressure gradient depends, besides the bed characteristics, on the velocities of both phases and on the physicochemical properties of the owing uids. With the increase of pressure, only gas density changes of all physicochemical properties of the owing uids. Thus, for given gas and liquid velocities, a higher gas density produces a higher interfacial drag force or equivalently a higher-pressure gradient. The gravitational force depends on liquid density and is not affected by pressure in the usual operating range of TBRs (less than 30 MPa). Therefore, the effect of gas on the pressure drop can be spilt into an effect of the supercial gas velocity and another due to gas density. Increased gas density leads to increased gasliquid interaction and the higher pressure drop. With the increase of operating pressure, the liquid holdup decreases whereas wetting efciency increases. With the increase of operating pressure, the operating range in trickle-ow regime also increases. A large number of studies have been reported in the literature on the various hydrodynamic aspects of tricklebed reactors. Though most of the research studies before 1990 have been performed at atmospheric pressure (Sai and Varma, 1987; Ellman et al., 1988, 1990), a considerable number of investigations have been performed in pressurised trickle-bed reactors after that period (Wammes et al., 1991; Al-Dahhan et al., 1998; Larachi et al., 1991; Nemec et al., 2001 and Guo and Al-Dahhan, 2004). Numerous attempts are being made to model the hydrodynamics of trickle-bed reactors. It ranges from merely empirical correlations (Ellman et al. 1988,1990; Larachi et al., 1991; Iliuta et al., 1999a,b) to physically sound models (Holub et al., 1992; Al-Dahhan et al., 1998; Iliuta et al., 2000; Sez and Carbonell, 1985; Carbonell, 2000; Nemec et al., 2001; Attou et al., 1999; Tung and Dhir, 1988

Fig. 1. Overview of different effects on trickle-bed reactor performance.

fed continuously. The liquid adds a transport resistance for the gaseous reactant that is often rate controlling for sparingly soluble gaseous reactants. The liquid phase, however, is essential to the system and cannot be eliminated. By periodic operation of a trickle-bed reactor, the transport resistance for the gaseous reactant is periodically reduced. This phenomena and its contribution towards process intensication has been explained here. Conventional hydrodesulfurization is carried out in cocurrent down ow trickle-bed reactors. The desulfurization reaction is product inhibited. As the reaction progresses down the reactor, the reaction slows down considerably for two reasons: (1) the hydrogen partial pressure reduces as hydrogen is consumed and (2) the H2 S formed, inhibits the reaction rate. Deep desulfurization in conventional trickle-bed reactors is thus extremely difcult. However, if the trickle-bed reactor were to be run in counter-current ow mode, the major part of the catalyst bed would operate in an H2 S lean mode thus allowing ultra-low sulfur levels to be achieved economically in the hydrocarbon liquid phase. One could conceive a multifunctional catalytic system that would allow counter ow trickle-bed operation without a high P penalty. Ring-shaped catalysts have been used in some desulfurization processes such as SynSat, but the bed depths are small as ring-shaped catalysts cannot take much weight. Structured catalysts such as Sulzers Katapak-S or M-Series or the composite structured packing described above may be worthwhile investigation targets. The countercurrent operation and different structured packing used in the literature has been discussed here.


K.D.P. Nigam, F. Larachi / Chemical Engineering Science 60 (2005) 5880 5894

Table 1 Comparison of theoretical models for the prediction of hydrodynamics in TBR Authors Sez and Carbonell (1985) Model The relative permeability model Characteristics of the model 1. The model is based on Erguns equation 2. The relative permeability of each phase has been correlated as a function of liquid saturation of each phase depending on the experimental results 3. The gasliquid interaction term has been neglected. 1. The complex geometry of the actual void space in the catalyst bed at the pore level has been represented by the much simpler ow inside a rectangular slit. 2. It is modied form of Ergun equation 3. Initially it is considered zero shear stress at the gas-liquid interface. Later Al-Dahhan et al. (1998) expressed the gas and liquid phase slip parameters as a function of gas and liquid phase Reynolds numbers. 1. It involves force balance equations in liquid and gas phase in elemental reactor volume. 2. The gasliquid interfacial drag has been taken into account 3. The tortuosity effect corrects the gravity term in the liquid phase and gas phase force balance equations 1. These models are based on macroscopic mass and momentum conservation laws. 2. The liquidsolid and gas-solid interaction forces are formulated on the basis of KozenyCarman equation. 3. Model does not predict well at low D/dp ratio (< 1214) due to column wall effect. 4. The gasliquid interfacial drag has been considered. 1. Based on Eulerian approach consisting of volume averaged ow equations. 2. Drag force is evaluated using concept of relative permeability of each phase as proposed by Sez and Carbonell (1985) 1. This model is based on Forchheimers equation originally employed to explain the inertia deviations in Darcys law for single phase ow. 2. Phasic F-function is multiplied with supercial velocity of each uid. 1. The Eulerian CFD model, the ow equations are solved for the kth uid. 2. The drag exchange coefcients are obtained from the Holub model.

Holub et al. (1992, 1993); Al-Dahhan and Dudukovic (1994); Al-Dahhan et al. (1998); Iliuta et al. (1999b)

The slit model

Tung and Dhir (1988); Narasimhan et al. (2002); Kundu et al. (2003c)

Model based on fundamental force balance

Attou et al. (1999)

1D-CFD model

Souadnia and Lati (2001) and Propp et al. (2000)

1D-CFD model

Fourar et al. (2001)

F-function concept

Jiang et al. (2002) and Gunjal et al. (2003)

k-uid model

and Narashiman et al., 2002). No consensus has emerged as to whether general approaches yielding pressure drop with acceptable accuracy can be recommended (Larachi et al., 2000). This is ascribable to many causes, among which the following are most frequently mentioned: (i) the complexity of the gasliquid ow patterns prevailing in trickle beds, (ii) the lack of accurate descriptions of two phase ow interactions, (iii) the complex relationship between trickle bed hydrodynamic characteristics, uids and bed properties, and interfacial interactions, (iv) the restricted range of the experimental data, and of the models/correlations derived thereof, usually reported for individual studies. In the category of physically sound models, six distinct approaches have been used for the prediction of hydrodynamics in TBRs. These are (i) the relative permeability model (Sez and Carbonell, 1985) (ii) slit model (Holub et al., 1992, 1993; Al-Dahhan and Dudukovic, 1994; Al-Dahhan et al., 1998; Iliuta et al., 1999b) (iii) model based on fundamen-

tal force balance (Tung and Dhir, 1988; Narashiman et al., 2002) (iv) 1D-CFD model (Attou et al., 1999; Souadnia and Lati, 2001) (v) F-function concept (Fourar et al., 2001) (vi) CFD model (Jiang et al., 2002; Gunjal et al., 2003). Salient features of each model are gured in Table 1. Process intensication in trickle-bed reactors is always carried out with the operation at high pressure and high temperature. When the process needs more conversion with respect to HDS, HDM and HDN, trickle-bed reactors are operated at high pressure and high temperature. Also in the case of hydrocracking, TBRs are operated at very high pressure and temperature to get the extreme severity. The total operating pressure is set by the design pressure of the unit and it can not be increased to the desired operating pressure beyond the design pressure. So the existing unit by increasing operating pressure and temperature can be operated up to the level of design pressure and temperature to get process intensication.

K.D.P. Nigam, F. Larachi / Chemical Engineering Science 60 (2005) 5880 5894


3. Wettability and porosity In TBRs, ow of gasliquid over porous catalyst particle is extremely complex. Liquids may or may not wet the surface completely. Some important reactor design parameters like pressure drop, liquid holdup and wetting efciency affected by this external surface coverage of the particle or spreading of liquid over the particle. Here change in wettability refers to the change in liquid ow, which increases or decreases fractional coverage of the particle, i.e., wetting efciency. External wetting efciency (i.e., fraction of external area of catalyst effectively wetted by the liquid owing down the bed) of the catalyst is an important feature in trickle-bed operation as it gives an indication of the extent of catalyst utilisation. It is a function of ow rates of gas and liquid, operating pressure, physical properties of liquid and diameter of the catalyst. The external wetting efciency of catalyst in trickle-bed reactor has been obtained experimentally from a chemical method based on reaction rates, dynamic tracer technique and dissolution and dye adsorption technique. Many authors have used the dynamic tracer technique (Al-Dahhan and Dudukovic, 1995, 1996; Ring and Missen, 1991; Mills and Dudukovic, 1981), which allows the determination of wetting efciency in actual beds under operating conditions. Llano et al. (1997) has determined the wetting efciency using reaction method. In reality, the reaction method requires an adequate reactor model, the main difculty of which lies in axial dispersion. There are two approaches to predict the wetting efciency in TBR. In one approach, it is expressed as the ratio of particle-liquid drag forces in two-phase ow and liquid-lled operation. Assuming the whole liquid owing as a falling lm and the gas phase as a continuous phase in the tricklebed reactor conguration, point force balances are applied to the two owing phases. Gas and liquid ow congurations in a unit volume cell representing cross-sectionally averaged ow conditions are shown in Fig. 2. The annular conguration has been postulated here, but such a force balance should be equally applicable to other ow regimes, provided the effect of ow regimes is accounted elsewhere. In the gure, Particlegas drag force, FP G is opposed by an equal and opposite force applied by the particles on the other side of the liquid layer. FI is the drag force on the gas as a result of relative motion between the two phases (Narasimhan et al., 2002). The force balance on the gas phase is given by: {(dP /dZ) +

Fig. 2. Model presentation and different types of forces acting during the ow of gas and liquid over the catalyst particle in a trickle-bed reactor.

due to the liquid motion. The force balance on the liquid then yields {(dP /dZ) +

}(1 ) = FP L FI ,


} = F P G + FI .


The term is the gas saturation, which is dened as the volume of gas present in a void volume of the reactor and may be obtained from the difference of the value of unity and the liquid saturation, . The liquid phase force can also be broken into two components FP G and FP L . The rst component FP G is simply a reaction to the force by which the gas pushes the liquid against the particles. The second component FP L represents the force acting on the particles

FP G, FP L , and FI represent the drag forces per unit of total bed volume. The model for particle-liquid and particlegas drag was obtained from the modied KozenyCarman equation. The model equations are elaborated in Narashiman et al. (2002). Another approach for quantifying wetting efciency is based on the understanding of liquid movement over the porous catalyst (Khanna and Nigam, 2002). Recent efforts by Starov et al. (2002ac, 2003) have provided a valuable insight into the mechanics of the process based on Brinkmans equations for description of ow inside the porous layer and by lubrication and continuum theory for liquid drop ow over it (Starov, 1983; Teletzke et al., 1987). That analysis is extremely useful for conditions where a xed amount of liquid (drop) is put on porous substrate. In trickle-bed reactors, a continuous ow of liquid is maintained along with gas ow. It is therefore essential to understand the intricacies between porous surface and movement of liquid on it to develop better understanding of the above design parameters/hydrodynamic parameters in TBR. Khanna and Nigam (2002) tried to improve the understanding of liquid movement on porous catalyst using a conceptual model. They modeled the surface of porous particle as alternating patches of saturated pore and solid surface. With increasing wettability the wetting efciency increases as the contact line advances on solid surface and eventually merges with neighbouring rivulets. One starts with a wetting efciency of I (Fig. 3) and lm morphology as in stage A, increase in wettability results rst in a regular increase (Stage B) in the wetting efciency followed by a small


K.D.P. Nigam, F. Larachi / Chemical Engineering Science 60 (2005) 5880 5894

Fig. 4. Qualitative variation of local wetting efciency as a function of catalyst wettability as the wettability increases (-) and then decreases (- - -). Change in wetting efciency with movement of contact line (reproduced from Khanna and Nigam, 2002).

Fig. 3. Change in wetting efciency with movement of contact line (reproduced from Khanna and Nigam, 2002).

of the liquid lm that covers the solid catalyst. Higher wettability would translate into thinner lms. From the above argument it is shown that pore has a prominent role on enhancement of liquid spreading and on pinning or holding back of liquid during retraction. Maiti et al. (2004b) supplemented the above argument by using the experimental observation of Ravindra et al. (1997) and in house study of Arora (2002). Also in the light of the above pore level conceptual framework of Khanna and Nigam (2002) it was assumed that porosity should play a role in hysteretic behavior of TBR. Therefore hysteretic observation was re-examined to improve the understanding of the hysteretic behavior of trickle-bed reactor.

decrease (the rst transition, B C) and then again a regular increase (Stage C) followed by a sudden vertical increase (the second transition, C D) and once again a regular increase (Stage D). When the catalyst wettability decreases, the contact line starts decreasing and will result in a reduction of the wetting efciency. The retracting contact line retracts on a wetted surface unlike on a dry surface. After reaching the edge of the liquid lled pore, it becomes stationary so that any more retraction is very difcult, which leads to unusually high wetting efciency (Stage D E, Fig. 3). If non-homogeneities are present in the form of completely wettable saturated pore and partially wettable solid patches, lm rupture happens showing a sudden dip in wetting (Stage F in Fig. 3). Depending on whether the wettability change forces the contact line to move across a saturated pore or a solid surface the wetting efciency will change at either faster or slower rates (Fig. 4). They found that microscopic wettability of solid catalyst has a direct effect on thickness

4. Pore induced hysteresis In the light of recent work by Khanna and Nigam (2002), Arora (2002) and Maiti et al. (2004) whereby porosity is shown to play a major role in spreading and retraction of liquid, it was expected that porosity of the packing material is likely to play a major role in hysteretic behavior of TBR. Therefore hysteretic behavior of TBR was re-examined in the above pore level conceptual framework. The performance of TBR depends mainly on two hydrodynamic parameters viz., pressure drop across the reactor and liquid hold-up inside the reactor. The performance of the reactor is mostly predicted by using experimentally developed empirical/semi empirical correlations for these parameters. Recently a more fundamental approach was proposed to predict hydrodynamic parameters like pressure drop, liquid hold-up and wetting efciency considering

K.D.P. Nigam, F. Larachi / Chemical Engineering Science 60 (2005) 5880 5894


gasliquidparticle interaction and tortuosity factor (Narasimhan et al., 2002, Kundu et al., 2003c). These developments are chronicled in reviews of (Zhukova et al., 1990; Gianetto and Specchia, 1992; Saroha and Nigam, 1996; Al-Dahhan et al., 1997; Sie and Krishna, 1998; Kundu et al., 2003b; Maiti et al., 2004a). Predictions of these correlations and actual performance of TBR differ signicantly in many cases. One of the major contributors to these differences has been existence of hysteresis in pressure drop and liquid holdup at same liquid and gas ow rate in TBR (Kan and Greeneld, 1978, 1979; Ravindra et al., 1997). It has been reported that this hysteresis depends on three factors viz., startup conditions, the mode of operation and the type of packing material (Ravindra et al., 1997). The startup conditions refer to the state of the system with respect to initial prewetting or non-prewetting of the solid packing by the liquid. The mode of operation refers to how the desired ow has been attained whether by increasing the ow of uid from a low value or decreasing it from a high value. The type of packing material refers to it being porous or nonporous. Among all these studies, only one study (Ravindra et al., 1997) has looked at the inuence of all the three control parameters. In all these studies hysteresis has been attributed to the difference between advancing and receding contact angle in rivulet and lm ow of liquid over the solid packing. The porous/nonporous nature of the packing though being taken as one of the control parameters has not been taken into consideration. An attempt has been made to examine this role based on the framework proposed by Khanna and Nigam (2002) and subsequent analysis of Maiti et al. (2004b).

Fig. 5. Effect of periodic operation on the temperature of the catalyst bed.

5. Induced pulsing Sometimes process intensication of a trickle-bed reactor can be obtained by forced no steady operation. For process intensication it is required to improve the mass transfer characteristics of the limiting reactant. Simultaneously, ow maldistribution and the formation of hot spots must be prevented or at least controlled. If we can control the wetting efciency as a function of time and utilizing the advantages associated with pulsing ow, it is possible to meet the demands for process intensication. Unsteady operations can be performed in one of two ways in the slow mode, where with a time interval of the order of minutes periodic changes of liquid feed rate and/or reactant concentration are forced; in the fast mode where short pulses of liquid, in the order of seconds, travel through the column. TBRs are usually operated at steady-state conditions. Recent studies have demonstrated reactor performance improvement over the optimal steady state under forced timevarying liquid ow rates. In this mode of operation, the bed

is periodically pushed with liquid, while the gas phase is fed continuously. This on-off feed strategy increases reactor performance in case the limiting reactant is in the gas phase. During the liquid ush, heat and products are removed from the catalyst, while in between ushes, the gaseous reactants can more easily adsorb on the catalyst. The overall mass transport rate of the limiting gaseous reactant to the catalyst is increased. Haure et al. (1989) and Lee et al. (1995) used this concept for the oxidation of SO2 to sulfuric acid. They reported the increase in oxidation rates up to 50%. During the periodic operation, higher bed temperatures were encountered compared to steady-state operation (see Fig. 5 for temperature variation in the catalyst bed, adopted from Boelhouwer, 2001). Only half of the rate enhancement could be attributed to these higher temperatures. The additional improvement is due to an increase in the mass transfer of oxygen to the catalyst. The duration of the ush is determined by the time needed to fully regenerate the catalyst. To demonstrate the advantages of periodic operation on a reaction, in which both the gas and liquid phase contain reactants, the hydrogenation of -methyl styrene was studied by Lange et al. (1994); Castellari and Haure (1995); Gabarain et al. (1997) and Lange et al. (1999). These studies reported the increase in reaction rates up to 400%. Recently, Urseanu et al. (2004) compared the performance of TBR with the periodic operated TBR for hydrogenation of -methyl styrene over 2 wt% Pd/C catalyst in a pilot scale reactor at temperature of 40 C and pressure of 0.2 MPa. They obtained an increase of 50% in reaction rate in periodic operation. Periodic operation results in signicant increase in production capacity and conversion compared to steady state operation for gas-limiting reactions. For liquid limiting reactions, steady state operation is superior to periodic operation. The optimal durations of the high and low liquid feed are strongly interdependent. A fast cycling of the liquid feed is most effective in terms of production capacity, conversion and selectivity. With increasing cycled liquid feed frequency, the time average concentration of the liquid phase reactant inside the catalyst


K.D.P. Nigam, F. Larachi / Chemical Engineering Science 60 (2005) 5880 5894

increases and the time-average concentration of the product decreases. High concentrations of liquid phase reactant result in high reaction rates for the desired reaction. Low concentration levels of the product lead to low reaction rates for the undesired reaction. Process intensication using periodic operation of TBR is obvious with respect to liquid distribution, temperature distribution and overall reactor performance. So far this technique has not found any commercial application in hydroprocessing.
Fig. 6. Illustration of cycled liquid feed in forced induced pulsing trickle bed.

6. Filtration and induced pulsing A promising perspective to forced periodic operation concerns the stretching of the life cycle of trickle-bed hydrotreaters experiencing plugging due to nes deposition in some petroleum industry operations. Such situations occur for instance when the clay-containing Athabasca oil sand bitumen are rened in trickle-bed hydrotreaters. Plugging develops and leads to progressive obstruction of the catalyst bed that is often accompanied with a rise in pressure drop. Although the nes concentration lies typically in the 100 wppm range, the cumulative effect of several months of rening operation diverts the catalyst bed from its catalytic function to that of a huge lter. In these conditions, the unit is often shutdown to unload the plugged catalyst bed for replacement with a pristine one. One important aspect during plugging that could be exploited in forced periodic operation is the ability to enhance the release of deposited ne particles from pore bodies within the porous bed due to hydrodynamic (non-Brownian nes) or colloidal (Brownian nes) forces. The release of nes is known to be a threshold process, that is, a minimum perturbation is required to detach the nes from the pore surface. This could be in terms of a critical hydrodynamic stress so that the released ne particles while owing with the liquid phase can either re-adhere to the collector surface, ow without capture, or get entrapped downstream at the pore constrictions. Iliuta and Larachi (2005a,b) analyzed theoretically the benets of forced induced pulsing on the mitigation of nes plugging in trickle beds operating under hydrotreating conditions. For this purpose, a dynamic multiphase ow deep-bed ltration model was established which incorporates physical effects of porosity and effective specic surface area changes due to nes deposition/release, gas and suspension inertial effects, and coupling effects between the ltration parameters and the interfacial momentum exchange force terms. The release of the ne particles from the collector surface was assumed to be induced by the colloidal forces in the case of Brownian nes (df < 2 m) or by the hydrodynamic forces in the case of non-Brownian nes. The parameters of the pulsing sequence are the base and pulse liquid velocities (vlb , vlp ) and the corresponding durations (tb , tp ) as shown in Fig. 6. The pressure drops are normalized with respect

Fig. 7. Pressure drop rise in induced pulsing vs. normal operation (df = 15 m, c0 = 0.1 g/L): periodic operation: vlp = 0.009 m/s, vlb = 0.003 m/s, tp = tb = 500 s; normal operation: vl = 0.006 m/s. vg = 0.1 m/s.

to that with a clean nes-free liquid under identical conditions. In Fig. 7 pressure drop simulations indicate that for non-Brownian nes, periodic operation reduces the specic solid deposit, and thus plugging, in the reactor as opposed to normal trickle-bed operation, viz., steady-state suspension feed ux. Fig. 8 represents the effect of ne diameter on pressure drop. The larger the ne diameter the more intense their detachment from collectors. On the contrary, liquid ow rate induced pulsing affects only very slowly the attenuation of plugging in trickle-bed reactors when the suspension is composed of Brownian ne particles. However, instead of liquid ow rate induced pulsing, liquid ow shear shocks, consisting of alternating immaculate liquid feed with the suspension at constant ow rate, accelerate the detachment of the Brownian particles which has been shown in Fig. 9. Liquid forced induced pulsing might contribute in alleviating possible conversion drop offs in hydrodesulfurization. This can be due to the superimposed mass retardation brought about through the build-up of nes around the

K.D.P. Nigam, F. Larachi / Chemical Engineering Science 60 (2005) 5880 5894


Fig. 8. Pressure drop rise at different values of ne diameters (c0 =0.1 g/L; periodic operation: vlp = 0.009 m/s, vlb = 0.003 m/s.

Fig. 9. Bed-averaged transient specic deposit (c0 = 1.0 g/L) under liquid ow shear shock (c0 = 0.0 g/L) for Brownian ne particles (df = 1 m). vg = 0.1 m/s in all cases.

catalytic collecting particles. Thick and/or densely packed deposits would eventually impede access of dissolved hydrogen and sulfur-bearing molecules to the inner catalyst intra-granular porosity. Thus, induced pulsing might play a positive effect when non-Brownian nes are involved in the deposition process as the deposit layer is likely to be eroded as inferred from the reduction of bed pressure drop, vide supra. On the contrary, it is not expected that induced pulsing would yield benecial conversion effects in the case of Brownian nes. Simulations were thus attempted to check such contentions for model catalytic hydrodesulfurization of dibenzothiophene over sulded CoOMoO3 /Y-Al2 O3 catalyst at high temperature/pressure in a trickle-bed reactor operating under ltration (Iliuta et al., 2005). Fig. 10 shows the predicted outlet dibenzothiophene conversion plotted as a function of inuent nes concentration for two different values of nes diameter after 485 min and constant liquid

Fig. 10. Effect of ne particles deposition process on dibenzothiophene conversion at t = 485 min (Tin = 598 K, Pin = 10 MPa): (a) df = 5 m, (b) df = 1 m.

ow rate operation. Dibenzothiophene conversion is lower the higher the nes feed concentration. This is due to the fact that higher values of overall specic deposit ensue generating more mass transfer resistances, though not too severe, in the solid deposit. This is reected in the lower values of the effectiveness factors due to the additional mass transfer resistance of the external deposit. However, as can be seen in Fig. 10, ne particles deposition inuences only slightly the trickle-bed reactor catalytic performance regardless of whether Brownian or non-Brownian nes are concerned. These results seem to indicate that forced liquid induced pulsing is benecial exclusively from the standpoint of


K.D.P. Nigam, F. Larachi / Chemical Engineering Science 60 (2005) 5880 5894

hydraulics by delaying plugging and pressure drop rise. Its effects are only secondary in terms of catalytic reactions because nes-deposition outer-particle diffusion remains reasonably fast.

7. Articial gravity with strong inhomogeneous magnetic elds Improvement of chemical processes is a continuous task in multiphase catalytic systems where a number of factors can be optimized for improving process efciency (e.g., catalyst wetting efciency, selectivity, etc.). It is believed that magnetic elds could open up very attractive new applications. External inhomogeneous strong magnetic elds are able to vary the gravity conditions for both diamagnetic and paramagnetic owing materials. The magnetization force exerted by the magnetic eld is a body force proportional to the local magnetic eld and magnetic eld gradient (Bz dBz /dz) as well as to the body magnetic susceptibility ( ). The sign of this force could be negative or positive, depending on magnetic susceptibility of materials and on magnetic eld gradient sign. The resultant force acting on the material is the sum between the magnetization force and the gravitational force g =g(1+ / g o Bz dBz /dz) and being the articial gravity factor. When such resultant is zero ( = 0), levitation occurs, and around which microgravity (small net downward resultant force), hypergravity (upward resultant force, > 1) or hypogravity ( < 1) take place as represented in Fig. 11. The experiments performed in true low gravity conditions are expensive and demand complicate installations. Powerful superconducting magnets constitute adequate proxies for ground experimentations to mimic (extra-terrestrial) articial gravity environments. Microgravity conditions could be obtained for both paramagnetic and diamagnetic uid materials submitted to inhomogeneous magnetic elds. Wakayama et al. (2001) obtained microgravity values of 0.04 g for a solution of cobalt chloride and 0.5 g for water. Iliuta and Larachi (2003) developed a two-phase ow model that takes in consideration the magnetic eld effect on gasliquid trickle ow. The main hydrodynamics parameters (liquid holdup, pressure drop and wetting efciency) have been shown to be inuenced by the magnetic eld. Preliminary calculations and experimental data conducted at Laval University revealed that inhomogeneous and strong magnetic elds applied to trickle bed reactors are capable of affecting hydrodynamics and might thus improve process performances. A superconducting NbTi solenoid magnet was used to obtain a 9 T maximum magnetic induction and a product gradient in the range of 650 T2 /m. A mini trickle-bed reactor was positioned in the atmospheric magnet bore in the maximum positive product gradient region (+650 T2 /m). The waterairglass beads (1 mm) system was used at different ow rates where liquid holdup and

Fig. 11. Articial gravity sustained in a superconducting magnet. Different magnetic susceptibilities (ca ) and induction gradients (Bz dBz /dz) yield levitation, hypo/hypergravity.

Fig. 12. (a) Liquid holdup in the absence (empty symbol) and in the presence (empty symbol) of a 9 T magnetic eld at different gas velocities for 1 mm glass beads: 0 m/s (, ); 0.02 m/s ( , ); 0.04 m/s ( , ). (b) Pressure drop in the absence (empty symbol) and in the presence (lled symbol) of a 9 T magnetic eld at different gas velocities for 1 mm glass beads: 0.007 m/s ( , ); 0.03 m/s ( , ); 0.04 m/s ( , ).

K.D.P. Nigam, F. Larachi / Chemical Engineering Science 60 (2005) 5880 5894


pressure drop were measured and compared to the case with no magnetic eld. Fig. 12a,b compares the evolution of liquid holdup and pressure drop at various air and water ow rates with active and inactive magnetic eld. Positive-gradient inhomogeneous magnetic elds promote larger values of liquid holdup (and thus wetting efciency in trickle ow regime) and twophase pressure drop. These trends have been rationalized as follows: Water, being diamagnetic, exhibits a negative magnetic susceptibility for which the prevailing articial gravity factor = 0.52 is propitious to hypogravity in the liquid. Hypogravity in liquid favors longer liquid residence times thus also larger liquid holdups. Air, being paramagnetic, exhibits a positive magnetic susceptibility for which the resulting =17.0 promotes rather gas hypergravity. Hypergravity in gas favors more gasliquid interactions and thus pressure drop is expected to increase under inhomogeneous magnetic elds.

Fig. 13. Schematic Drawing of katapak-s structured packing with catalyst particles inside envelopes (from Ellenberger and Krishna, 1999).

8. Structured geometries 8.1. Structured catalytic packing with cocurrent downward ow Versteeg et al. (1997), Ellenberger and Krishna (1999) tried the structured packing (KATAPAK TM ), shown in Fig. 13, to obtain better performances in trickle-bed reactors. They have compared the performance of TBR for a hydrogenation of -methylstyrene with the structured packing coated with a thin alumina layer and the randomly packed 3 mm alumina sphere with paladium. The gas and liquid ow were in cocurrent downward mode in both cases. The overall performances of trickle-bed reactors did not improve signicantly in trickle-ow conditions for the change of catalyst packing from the randomly packed spherical particles to structured catalyst packing (KATAPAK TM ). They reported that the increase in physical absorption rate due to better mass transfer characteristics of structured packings compared to dumped packings was eliminated to a certain extent in reactive system due to the enhancement effect of heterogeneous reactions in trickle-ow operation. Nijhuis et al. (2001) reported structured packing in cocurrent downward mode with monolithic catalyst. In contrary to the results of Versteeg et al. (1997), they have reported the better performance in terms of productivity of the monolithic catalyst for the hydrogenation of -methylstyrene and better selectivity for the hydrogenation of benzaldehyde to benzylalchol. Though this type of reactor may be advantageous for some specic reactions, it can not be useful, in general, considering the point of catalyst utilization per reactor volume and mass transfer driving force. Fig. 14 represents catalyst structures frequently used in monolithic reactors.

Fig. 14. Different structures of internally nned monolith catalyst.

9. Countercurrent catalytic packed bed reactors Packed bed with countercurrent operation with respect to gas and liquid phases is being widely used in gas absorption and desorption, distillation, gas extraction and liquidliquid contacting. They are also used as entrainment separators and for the removal of dust, mists and odors. This type of bed consists of packing, which has porosity greater than 0.9 (such as raschig ring, pall ring, nutter ring, saddle type, tellurates, mellapak, intalox metal tower packing). These packings demonstrate very low-pressure drop, because of large voidage in the bed. Countercurrent operation with catalytic


K.D.P. Nigam, F. Larachi / Chemical Engineering Science 60 (2005) 5880 5894

packed bed where reaction takes place and having very large surface area to volume ratio has also been attempted to use for some processes. The higher momentum transfer between gas and liquid phase in countercurrent operation with packed catalyst bed having small catalyst particles causes ooding at very low velocities. This problem can possibly be overcome by increasing the porosity of the catalyst bed and/or by making separate paths for the ow of gas and liquid. Hydroprocessing operations play an important role in rening industry to remove obnoxious impurities such as sulfur and nitrogen from various petroleum fractions as well as to convert the heavier fractions into lighter ones. These operations are generally carried out in multiphase cocurrent trickle-bed reactors in which the liquid hydrocarbon and the gaseous hydrogen pass in a downward way through a xed bed of solid catalyst. However, these reactors have their own limitations (Sie, 1997; Sie and Krishna, 1998; Van Hasselt et al., 1997; Sie and Lebens, 1998). For example, for the case of hydrodesulfurization (HDS), the concentration of hydrogen sulde, an inhibitor for the HDS of the refractory sulfur compounds, increases along the downward axial length of the reactor. As a result, the concentration of H2 S becomes higher at the bottom zone of the reactor where the desulfurization of the most refractory sulfur compounds takes place. In addition, the concentration of hydrogen becomes lower in this zone of the reactor thereby slowing down the rate of desirable hydrogenation reactions. The temperature of the catalyst bed at the lower part of the reactor also becomes higher which is not desirable for a number of reactions. All these drawbacks of a cocurrent trickle-bed reactor can be overcome if the reactor is operated in a countercurrent mode in which the liquid hydrocarbon ows from top to bottom and the hydrogen passes in an upward way from the bottom of the reactor. The countercurrent operation of a xed bed reactor is promising to get high conversion and to maintain higher driving force for concentration throughout the reactor length (Kundu et al., 2003a). Moreover, it can reduce the build up of the inhibitory byproducts at the bottom zone of the reactor (Trambouze, 1990). The countercurrent mode of operation is also advantageous in order to obtain a more desirable temperature prole in the reactor.

have used different types of packings. The packings used are listed below: 1. Cylindrical catalyst bundles (catalyst containing bales). 2. Katapak-s conguration of sulzer. 3. A binderless lm of zeolite crystals on common structured distillation packing. 4. Katamax packing. 5. Catalytically active packing material in the form of raschig ring. 6. Three-levels-of-porosity (TLP) packing. 7. Monolithic catalysts. 8. Spiral coils. It was also observed that the pressure drop in the reactor with spiral coils, TLP and internally nned-monolith (IFM) catalyst was very much less than random catalyst used in the trickle-bed reactor for the same ow rate of gas and liquid. The operating range for the ow rate of gas and liquid in reactor with spiral coils, TLP and IFM catalyst was also higher compared to that of conventional TBR. The criteria for development of structured catalytic packings require the reduction of momentum transfer between the two phases at the minimal expense of mass transfer, which will result to minimize the ooding. This will not affect the rate of reaction, because it has been found that intraparticle diffusion resistance is very large compared to gasliquid and liquidsolid mass transfer resistance (Sie, 1997). The solubility of hydrogen is very high in petroleum fractions and the reactions are carried out at high pressure. As a result, the liquid is saturated with the gas. Also the liquid side and liquid-solid side resistances are negligible with respect to the resistances offered inside the catalyst (Froment and Bischoff, 1990). Table 2 gives the overall view of the structured catalysts. Among these structured catalysts listed in Table 2, two types of structured catalysts are used for absorption and gas extraction processes having porosity greater than 0.9. Iliuta et al. (1997) compared the performance of two modes of operation-cocurrent and countercurrent using randomly packed Raschig ring having porosity 0.69. Total and dynamic liquid holdup in cocurrent downward ow was same with that in countercurrent ow, but the mass transfer coefcient values for countercurrent ow were higher compared to cocurrent downward ow. The high Pclet number values for two-phase countercurrent operation indicate that axial mixing due to dispersion was negligible. To obtain high yield, plug ow desired, and a pulse ow regime is preferred to a trickle ow due to extra advantages like increased wetting efciency, enhanced mass transfer coefcients and improved uniformity of ow through the bed in pulse ow regime. The commercial applications of the catalytic packed bed countercurrent operation are AROSAT processwhere a relatively small catalyst bed is operated in the countercurrent mode at the tail end of a conventional trickle-bed reactor to allow deeper hydrodenitrogenation and SYNSAT

9.1. Countercurrent operations-different types of structured catalytic packing Many workers (Zheng and Xu, 1992; Xu et al., 1997; Subawalla et al., 1997; Lebens et al., 1997; Van Hasselt et al., 1997; Sie and Lebens, 1998; Moritz and Hasse, 1999; Ellenberger and Krishna, 1999; Oudshoorn et al., 1999; Higler et al., 1999 and Kundu et al., 2003a) have analyzed the countercurrent operation in a xed catalytic bed reactor with a view to study pressure drop, liquid holdup, residence time distribution and mass transfer. In deriving their correlations or models for hydrodynamic parameters, different workers

Table 2 Different types of structured packing used for catalytic packed bed countercurrent operation
Type of catalyst Porosity

Dia. of catalyst particles (m) 0.0002215

Dia. of tower (m) 0.035

Height of the bed (m) 0.9

System used

UG and UL


Sulzer CY (Gas extraction)


Water + CO2 , Aqueous surfactant solution + CO2 Airwater

Stocketh and Brunner (1999) K.D.P. Nigam, F. Larachi / Chemical Engineering Science 60 (2005) 5880 5894

Catalyst Bundles


0.00030.0012 1.6 103 m cylindrical -Al2 O3 extrudates and glass beads with a dia.3 103 m 0.001 m glass sphere



0.63 m/s and 525 m3 /m2 h 00.6 m/s and 00.0069 m/s

Xu et al. (1997)


0.41, 0.368

0.11 m.

0.03, 0.09, 0.1, 0.12, 0.15 and 0.21


Van Hasselt et al. (1999)


0.7953, 0.8018

0.1 0.24

1.8 1.705


01.6 m/s and 00.02 m/s, 01.6 m/s and 00.05 m/s and 333 m3 /m2 h 0.0280.38 m/s and 0.0050.011 m/s 01.5 m/s and 00.06 m/s

Ellenberger and Krishna (1999)


0.001 m glass sphere



Airwater AirIsopar. L Airwater

Moritz and Hasse (1999)

Rachig ring (random packing)





Iluita et al. (1997)

Internally nned monolith


0.00462 m (diameter of each channel), 0.00107 m (height of each n), 0.000497 m (thickness of the n and the wall) 0.0052 m (effective diameter)


0.5, 1.0 and 0.06

n-decaneair, water-air and 30 wt% sucrose solutionair

Lebens et al. (1999)

GPP packing (8 8 mm rings)





Sundmacher and Hofmann (1994)



K.D.P. Nigam, F. Larachi / Chemical Engineering Science 60 (2005) 5880 5894

processwhere the similar conguration is used for hydrodesulfurization of gas oil with aromatic saturation. Process intensication can be obtained using countercurrent xed bed catalytic reactors. There is a need to design a perfect hardware of structured conguration with a higher catalyst volume/reactor volume ratio, industrially equivalent operating range and better contact between two owing phases.

receding contact line. This has the potential to explain the physics at micro-level in TBR. 5. Quantitative relation could be drawn between hydrodynamic parameters and pore induced liquid movement over solid surface with change of wettability. 6. The present understanding can be exploited in study of periodic operation of TBR where wettability changes in cyclic way. Notation Bz df FI FP G FP L P tb tp vlb vlp local magnetic eld diameter of ne drag force on the gas particlegas drag force the force acting on the particles due to the liquid motion pressure base duration pulse duration base liquid velocities pulse liquid velocities

10. Conclusion The process intensication in trickle-bed reactors is necessary in More Miles with fewer Emissions age. Periodic operation with respect to liquid ow may help in getting process intensication especially for gas-limiting reactions or for petroleum applications where ltration and bed plugging are serious threats. Understanding of ow behavior inside the catalyst bed is always helpful for better designing and scaleup of TBR. The much less focused wettability of catalyst has been discussed here based on contact angle of the liquid on the surface of porous particle as alternating patches of saturated pore and solid surface. The hysteresis behavior is also explained on the basis of the concept of wettability. Non-conventional research on magnetic-driven process intensication is worth exploring for mini trickle-bed reactors especially in non-petroleum applications such as in ne and pharmaceuticals chemical processes. The alternative type of TBR which can handle more impure reactants and get much more conversion is countercurrent catalytic packed bed reactor and the current status of this conguration is discussed here.

Greek letters gas saturation liquid saturation articial gravity factor bed void fraction absolute magnetic permeability of vacuum, H/m shear Stress term body magnetic susceptibility

11. Future recommendation

Al-Dahhan, M.H., Dudukovic, M.P., 1994. Pressure drop and liquid holdup in high pressure trickle-bed reactors. Chemical Engineering Science 49, 5681. Al-Dahhan, M.H., Dudokovic, M.P., 1995. Catalyst wetting efciency in trickle-bed reactors at high pressure. Chemical Engineering Science 50 (15), 2377. Al-Dahhan, M.H., Dudokovic, M.P., 1996. Catalyst bed dilution for improving catalyst wetting in laboratory trickle-bed reactors. A.I.Ch.E. Journal 42 (9), 2594. Al-Dahhan, M.H., Larachi, F., Dudukovic, M.P., Laurent, A., 1997. Highpressure trickle-bed reactors: a review. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 36, 3292. Al-Dahhan, M.H., Khadilkar, M.R., Wu, Y., Dudukovic, M.P., 1998. Prediction of pressure drop and liquid holdup in high pressure tricklebed reactors. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 37, 793. Arora R., 2002. Pinning effect of pores: an experimental observations. B.Tech Thesis, IIT Delhi, 2002. Attou, A., Boyer, C., Ferschneider, G., 1999. Modelling of the hydrodynamics of the cocurrent gasliquid trickle ow through a trickle-bed reactor. Chemical Engineering Science 54, 785. Boelhouwer, J.G., 2001. Nonsteady operation of trickle-bed reactorshydrodynamics, mass and heat transfer. Ph.D. Thesis, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven.

1. A possible improvement of liquid distribution and wetting efciency by cycling the liquid feed has been reported in the literature. There is no existing literature of experimental results on distribution of ow during cycled liquid-feed conditions as well as wetting characteristics of the catalyst in periodic operation. 2. There are mainly experimental studies in laboratory scale trickle-bed reactors reported in the literature. No systematic studies concerning the effect of column diameter on pulsing ow hydrodynamics are reported in the literature. 3. Though countercurrent catalytic packed bed reactor is a promising alternative, it still requires suitable hardware of the structured packing, which will have optimum value of catalyst volume/reactor volume and mass transfer between gas and liquid. Experimental studies with large diameter column are desired. 4. Wetting efciency could be correlated in terms of interfacial phenomena based on movement of advancing and

K.D.P. Nigam, F. Larachi / Chemical Engineering Science 60 (2005) 5880 5894 Carbonell, R.G., 2000. Multiphase ow models in packed beds. Oil and Gas Science and Technology 55 (4), 417. Castellari, A.T., Haure, P.M., 1995. Experimental study of the periodic operation of a trickle bed reactor. A.I.Ch.E. Journal 41, 1593. Dudukovic, M.P., Larachi, F., Mills, P.L., 2002. Multiphase catalytic reactors: a perspective on current knowledge and future trends. Catalysis Reviews Science and Engineering 44, 123. Ellenberger, J., Krishna, R., 1999. Counter-current operation of structured catalytically packed distillation columns: pressure drop, holdup and mixing. Chemical Engineering Science 54, 1339. Ellman, M.J., Midoux, N., Laurent, A., Charpentier, J.C., 1988. A new improved pressure drop correlation for trickle bed reactors. Chemical Engineering Science 43, 2201. Ellman, M.J., Midoux, N., Wild, G., Laurent, A., Charpentier, J.C., 1990. A new improved liquid holdup correlation for trickle bed reactors. Chemical Engineering Science 45, 1677. Fourar, M., Lenormand, R., Larachi, F., 2001. Extending the F-function concept to two-phase ow in trickle beds. Chemical Engineering Science 56 (2122), 5987. Froment, G.F., Bischoff, K.B., 1990. Chemical Reactor Analysis and Design. 2nd ed.. Wiley, New York. Gabarain, L., Castellari, A.T., Cechini, J., Tobolski, A., Haure, P.M., 1997. Analysis of rate enhancement in a periodically operated trickle-bed reactor. A.I.Ch.E. Journal 43, 166. Gianetto, A., Specchia, V., 1992. Trickle-bed reactorsstate of art and perspectives. Chemical Engineering Science 47, 3197. Gunjal, P.R., Ranade, V.V., Chaudhari, R.V., 2003. Liquid distribution and RTD in trickle-bed reactors: Experiments and CFD simulations. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 81, 821. Guo, J., Al-Dahhan, M.H., 2004. Liquid holdup and pressure drop in the gasliquid cocurrent downow packed-bed reactor under elevated pressures. Chemical Engineering Science 59, 5387. Haure, P.M., Hudgins, R.R., Silveston, P.L., 1989. Periodic operation of a trickle-bed reactor. A.l.Ch.E. Journal 35, 1437. Higler, A.P., Krishna, R., Ellenberger, J., Taylor, R., 1999. Countercurrent operation of a structured catalytically packed bed reactor: liquid phase mixing and mass transfer. Chemical Engineering Science 54, 5145. Holub, R.A., Dudokovic, M.P., Ramachandran, P.A., 1992. A phenomenological model for pressure drop, liquid holdup, and ow regime transition in gasliquid trickle ow. Chemical Engineering Science 47, 2343. Holub, R.A., Dudokovic, M.P., Ramachandran, P.A., 1993. Pressure drop, liquid holdup and ow regime transition in trickle ow. A.I.Ch.E. Journal 39, 302. Iliuta, I., Larachi, F., Al-Dahhan, M.H., 2000. Double-slit model for partially wetted trickle ow hydrodynamics. A.I.Ch.E. Journal 46, 597. Iliuta, I., Larachi, F., 2003. Theory of trickle-bed magnetohydrodynamics under magnetic-eld gradients. A.I.Ch.E. Journal 49, 1525. Iliuta, I., Larachi, F., 2005a. Stretching operational life of trickle-bed lters by liquid-induced pulse ow. A.I.Ch.E. Journal, accepted. Iliuta, I., Larachi, F., 2005b. Mitigating nes plugging in high pressure/temperature hydrotreaters using an induced-pulsing trickle bed ltration approach. Chemical Engineering Science, accepted, 2005. Iliuta, I., Larachi, F., Grandjean, B.P.A., 1999b. Catalyst wetting in trickle-bed reactors: a phenomeological model. Chemical Engineering Research Design 77, 759. Iliuta, I., Ring, Z., Larachi, F., 2005. Impact of ne particles deposition on the hydrodesulfurization process. Chemical Engineering Science, submitted, for publication. Iliuta, I., Ortiz-Arroyo, A., Larachi, F., Grandjean, B.P.A., Wild, G., 1999a. Hydrodynamics and mass transfer in trickle-bed reactors: an overview. Chemical Engineering Science 54, 5329. Iliuta, I., Thyrion, F.C., Bolle, L., Giot, M., 1997. Comparison of hydrodynamic parameters for countercurrent and cocurrent ow through packed beds. Chemical Engineering and Technology 20, 171. Jiang, Y., Khadilkar, M.R., Al-Dahhan, M.H., Dudukovic, M.P., 2002. CFD of multiphase ow in packed-bed reactors: I. k-uid modeling issues. A.I.Ch.E. Journal 48 (4), 701.


Kan, K.M., Greeneld, P.F., 1978. Multiple hydrodynamics states in cocurrent two-phase downow through packed beds. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, Process Design and Development 17, 482. Kan, K.M., Greeneld, P.F., 1979. Pressure drop and holdup in two-phase cocurrent trickle ows through beds of small packings. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, Process Design and Development 18, 740. Khanna, R., Nigam, K.D.P., 2002. Partial wetting in porous catalysts: wettability and wetting efciency. Chemical Engineering Science 57, 3401. Kundu, A., Nigam, K.D.P., Bej, S.K., 2003a. A novel countercurrent xed bed reactor. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 81 (34), 831. Kundu, A., Nigam, K.D.P., Duquenne, A.M., Delmas, H., 2003b. Recent developments on hydroprocessing reactors. Reviews in Chemical Engineering 19, 531. Kundu, A., Nigam, K.D.P., Verma, R.P., 2003c. Catalyst wetting characteristics in trickle-bed reactors. A.I.Ch.E. Journal 49 (9), 2253. Lange, R., Hanika, J., Stradiotto, R., Hudgins, R., Silveston, P.L., 1994. Investigations of periodically operated trickle-bed reactors. Chemical Engineering Science 49, 5615. Lange, R., Gutsche, R., Hanika, J., 1999. Forced periodic operation of a trickle-bed reactor. Chemical Engineering Science 54, 2569. Larachi, F., Laurent, A., Midoux, N., Wild, G., 1991. Experimental study of a trickle bed reactor operating at high pressure: two-phase pressure drop and liquid saturation. Chemical Engineering Science 46, 1233. Larachi, F., Iliuta, I., Al-Dahhan, M.A., Dudukovic, M.P., 2000. Discriminating trickle-ow hydrodynamic models: some recommendations. Industrial and Engineering Chemical Research 39, 554. Lebens, P.J.M., Heiszwolf, J.J., Kapteiyn, F., Sie, S.T., Moulijn, J.A., 1997. Hydrodynamics of gasliquid countercurrent ow in a internally nned monolithic structures. Chemical Engineering Science 52, 3893. Lebens, P.J.M., Heiszwolf, J.J., Kapteiyn, F., Sie, S.T., Moulijn, J.A., 1999. Gasliquid mass transfer in an internally nned monolith operated countercurrently in the lm ow regime. Chemical Engineering Science 54, 5119. Lee, K.J., Hudgins, R.R., Silveston, P.L., 1995. A cycled trickle bed reactor for SO2 oxidation. Chemical Engineering Science 50, 2523. Llano, J.J., Rosal, R., Sastre, H., Diez, F.V., 1997. Determination of wetting efciency in trickle-bed reactors by a reaction method. Industrial and Engineering Chemical Research 36, 2616. Maiti, R.N., Sen, P.K., Nigam, K.D.P., 2004a. Trickle-bed reactors: liquid distribution and ow texture. Reviews in Chemical Engineering 20, 57. Maiti, R.N., Sen, P.K., Khanna, R., Nigam, K.D.P., 2004b. Enhanced liquid spreading due to porosity. Chemical Engineering Science 59, 2817. Mills, P.L., Dudukovic, M.P., 1981. Evaluation of liquidsolid contacting in trickle bed reactors by tracer methods. A.I.Ch.E. Journal 27, 893. Moritz, P., Hasse, H., 1999. Fluid dynamics in reactive distillation packing Katapak -S. Chemical Engineering Science 54, 1367. Narashiman, C.S.L., Verma, R.P., Kundu, A., Nigam, K.D.P., 2002. Modeling hydrodynamics of trickle-bed reactors at high pressure. A.I.Ch.E. Journal 48 (11), 2459. Nemec, D., Bercic, G., Levec, J., 2001. The hydrodynamics of trickling ow in packed beds operating at high pressures. The relative permeability concept. Chemical Engineering Science 56, 5955. Ng, K.M., Chu, C.F., 1987. Trickle-bed reactors. Chemical Engineering Progress 83, 55. Nijhuis, T.A., Kreutzer, M.T., Romiju, A.C.J., Kapteijn, F., Moulijn, J.A., 2001. Monolithic catalysts as more efcient three-phase reactors. Catalysis Today 66, 157. Oudshoorn, O.L., Janissen, M., van Kooten, W.E.J., Jansen, J.C., van Bekkum, H., Van den Bleek, C.M., Calis, H.P.A., 1999. A novel structured catalyst packing for catalytic distillation of ETBE. Chemical Engineering Science 54, 1413. Propp, R.M., Colella, P., Crutcheld, W.Y., Day, M.S., 2000. A numerical model for trickle bed reactors. Journal of Computational Physics 165, 311.


K.D.P. Nigam, F. Larachi / Chemical Engineering Science 60 (2005) 5880 5894 Sundmacher, K., Hofmann, V., 1994. Multicomponent mass and energy transport on different length scales in a packed reactive distillation column for heterogenously catalysed fuel ether production. Chemical Engineering Science 49, 4443. Teletzke, G.F., Davis, H.T., Scriven, L.E., 1987. How liquids spread on solids. Chemical Engineering Communication 55, 41. Trambouze, P., 1990. Countercurrent two phase ow xed bed catalytic reactors. Chemical Engineering Science 45, 2269. Tung, V.X., Dhir, V.K., 1988. A hydrodynamic model for two phase ow through porous media. International Journal of Multiphase Flow 14, 47. Urseanu, M.I., Boelhouwer, J.G., Bosman, H.J.M., Schroijen, J.C., 2004. Induced pulse operation of high-pressure trickle bed reactors with organic liquids: hydrodynamics and reaction study. Chemical Engineering Processing 43, 1411. Van Hasselt, B.W., Lindenbergh, D.J., Calis, H.P.A., Sie, S.T., Van den Bleek, C.M., 1997. The three-levels-of-porosity reactor: A novel reactor for countercurrent trickle ow processes. Chemical Engineering Science 52, 3901. Versteeg, G.F., Visser, J.B.M., Dierendonck, L.L.van., Kuipers, J.A.M., 1997. Absorption accompanied with chemical reaction in trickle-bed reactors. Chemical Engineering Science 52, 4057. Wakayama, N.I., Zhong, C., Kiyoshi, T., Itoh, K., Wada, H., 2001. Control of vertical acceleration (effective gravity) between normal and microgravity. A.I.Ch.E. Journal 47, 2640. Wammes, W.J.A., Middlekamp, J., Huisman, W.J., Debases, C.M., Westerterp, K.R., 1991. Hydrodynamics in a cocurrent gasliquid trickle-bed at elevated pressures. Part I. gas liquid interfacial areas Part II. liquid holdup, pressure drop, ow regimes. A.I.Ch.E. Journal 37, 1849. Xu, X., Zhao, Z., Tien, S.J., 1997. Study on catalytic distillation processes, part-III. Prediction of pressure drop and holdup in catalyst bed. Transactions of Institution of Chemical Engineers (Part-A) 75, 625. Zheng, Y., Xu, X., 1992. Study on catalytic distillation processes, part-2: simulation of catalytic distillation processes-quasi-homogeneous and rate based model. Transactions of Institution of Chemical Engineering 70 (A), 465. Zhukova, T.B., Paisarenko, V.N., Kafarov, V.V., 1990. Modelling and design of industrial reactors with a stationery bed of catalyst and twophase gasliquid owa review. International Chemical Engineering 30, 57.

Ravindra, P.V., Rao, D.P., Rao, M.S., 1997. Liquid ow texture in trickle-bed reactors: an experimental study. Industrial and Engineering Chemical Research 36, 5133. Ring, Z.E., Missen, R.W., 1991. Trickle-bed reactors: tracer study of liquid holdup and wetting efciency at high pressure and temperature. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 69, 1016. Sez, A.E., Carbonell, R.G., 1985. Hydrodynamic parameters for gasliquid cocurrent ow in packed beds. A.I.Ch.E. Journal 31, 52. Sai, P.S.T., Varma, Y.B.G., 1987. Pressure drop in gasliquid downward ow through packed beds. A.I.Ch.E. Journal 33, 2027. Saroha, A.K., Nigam, K.D.P., 1996. Trickle bed reactors. Reviews in Chemical Engineering 12, 207. Sie, S.T., 1997. Novel concepts for countercurrent gasliquid xed bed reactor: Possibilities and potential advantages. Proceedings of the IIChE Golden Congress 2, 335. Sie, S.T., Krishna, R., 1998. Process development and scale up: III. Scale up and scale down of trickle bed processes. Reveiws in Chemical Engineering 14, 203. Sie, S.T., Lebens, P.J.M., 1998. Monolithic reactor for countercurrent gasliquid operation. Structured Catalyst and reactors. Marcel Dekker, New York. Souadnia, A., Lati, M.A., 2001. Analysis of two-phase ow distribution in trickle-bed reactors. Chemical Engineering Science 56, 5966. Starov, V.M., 1983. On the spreading of the droplets of non-volatile liquids over the solid surface. Colloid Journal of the USSR 45 (6), 1009. Starov, V.M., Kosvintsev, S.R., Sobolev, V.D., Velarde, M.G., Zhdanov, S.A., 2002a. Spreading of liquid drops over saturated porous layers. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 246, 372. Starov, V.M., Kosvintsev, S.R., Sobolev, V.D., Velarde, M.G., Zhdanov, S.A., 2002b. Spreading of liquid drops over dry porous layers: complete wetting case. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 252, 397. Starov, V.M., Zhdanov, S.A., Velarde, M.G., 2002c. Spreading of liquid drops over thick porous layers: complete wetting case. Langmuir 18, 9744. Starov, V.M., Zhdanov, S.A., Kosvintsev, S.R., Sobolev, V.D., Velarde, M.G., 2003. Spreading of liquid drops over porous substrates. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science 104, 123. Stocketh, R., Brunner, G., 1999. Hydrodynamics of a packed countercurrent column for the gas extraction. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 38, 4000. Subawalla, H., Gonzalez, J.C., Seibert, A.F., Fair, J.R., 1997. Capacity and efciency of reactive distillation bale packing: modeling and experimental validation. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 36, 3821.