Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Structural Stability
II. Column Strength
P =Pr
Mint
Py Mint = 0
0 0
c1
1 dA 0 2 dA = 0 E t 1 dA 0 E 2 dA = 0 E t (z1y) dA 0 E(z 2 y) dA = 0
c2 c1 c2 c2
c2
c1
c1
E t y0 z1 dA Ey0 z 2 dA = 0 E t 0 z1 dA E 0 z 2 dA = 0
CEE 6554, Column Strength
c1 c2
10
z1
z2
Q 2 = 0 z 2 dA = bc 2 / 2 2
c2
c1 E = c Et 2
11
(E t z1y) z1 dA 0 (Ez 2 y) z 2 dA
c2
2 = y E t 0 z1 dA + E 0 z 2 dA 2
c1
c2
= y ( E t I1 + E I2
)
P =Pr Mint
= y( Er I)
Er =
E t I1 + E I2 I
Py Mint = 0
Py + y (Er I) = 0 Pr = 2ErI Er = Pe L2 E
12
Py + y (E t I) = 0
Pt =
2E tI < Pr L2
13
Shanleys Theory
Take P1 & e1 + in tension Take P2 & e 2 + in compr
Deformable Cell
P2 e2
P1 e1
P2
P1
e1 + e 2 2 L (e1 + e 2 ) 4
Eq. (1)
14
Shanleys Theory
(Mcell )ext = Pd = PL (e1 + e 2 )
4
Deformable Cell
A P1 = E1 e1 2
A P2 = E 2 e 2 2
P2 e2
P1 e1
2 hA (E1e1 + E2 e2 ) = 4
P2
P1
Solving for P
P= hA (E1e1 + E 2 e 2 ) (e1 + e2 ) L
15
Shanleys Theory
Let E2 = Et , E1 = Et Either = 1 or E/Et ...
P= hAE t (e1 + e 2 ) L (e1 + e 2 )
Deformable Cell
P2
P1
e2
e1
P2
(e1 + e 2 ) = 4d
e 2 = 4d e1 L
P1
Substituting
P=
4d e1 e1 + hAE t L 4d L e1 e1 + L
16
Shanleys Theory
4d e1 e1 + hAE t L P= 4d L e1 e1 + L
Deformable Cell
P2 e2
P1 e1
P=
AhE t L
L 1 + 4d ( 1)e1
P2
P1
P = Pt =
AhE t L
17
Shanleys Theory
Is there any P associated with the onset of bending?
P = P2 P1
= E 2 e 2 A A E1 e1 2 2
Deformable Cell
P2 e2
P1 e1
A 4d A = Et e1 E t e1 2 L 2 P = AE t 4d ( + 1)e1 2 L AE t 4d ( + 1)e1 2 L
P2
P1
P = Pt +
2d L P = Pt 1 + ( + 1)e1 h 2h
CEE 6554, Column Strength
18
Shanleys Theory
2d L P = Pt 1 + ( + 1)e1 h 2h
Deformable Cell
P2
e2
P1
e1
P2
Eq. (3)
P1
1 P = Pt 1 + h + 1 + 2d 1
19
Shanleys Theory
1 P = Pt 1 + h + 1 + 2d 1
Deformable Cell
P2 e2
P1 e1
Notes: (1) When d = 0, P = Pt (2) If we assume = 1 (no strain reversal) P stays const as the member buckles (3) However, bending at const P causes strain reversal (4) If we assume = E/Et (strain reversal in elem 1) P must increase the result is consistent with the assumption
P2
P1
20
10
Shanleys Theory
Let L = 10, h = 1, = 50
4d 1 e1 = 10( 49) 1 + 51 2d 49
Deformable Cell
P2 e2
P1 e1
1 P = Pt 1 + 1 51 + 2d 49
P2
P1
21
Shanleys Theory
1 vs d for L=10, h=1, =50
0.000007 0.000006 0.000005 0.000004 1 0.000003 0.000002 0.000001 0 0
CEE 6554, Column Strength
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
0.01 d
0.012
0.014
0.016
0.018
0.02
22
11
Shanleys Theory
P/Pt vs d for L=10, h=1, =50
1.05
1.04
1.03 P/Pt 1.02 1.01 1 0 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.01 d 0.012 0.014 0.016 0.018 0.02
23
Shanleys Theory
Assuming Et = const Do we reach a limit load at some value of P?
P1 = P2 E1e1 = E 2 e 2
Ee1 = E t e 2
Deformable Cell
P2 e2
P1 e1
e1 =
Et e 2 e 2 = E
4d 1 e1 = e1 L
e1 = 4d 1 L 1+
P2
P1
1 P = Pt 1 + + 1
12
25
26
13
27
28
14
Representative first-yield and fully-plastic strength envelopes, compact doubly-symmetric I-sections subjected to major-axis bending
W40x167, fully-plastic resistance
1.0
W40x167, nominal first yield W14x257, fully-plastic resistance W14x257, nominal first yield AISC Eqs. H1-1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
29
Representative first-yield and fully-plastic strength envelopes, compact doubly-symmetric I-sections subjected to minor-axis bending
1.0
W40x167, fully-plastic resistance W40x167, nominal first yield W14x257, fully-plastic resistance W14x257, nominal first yield AISC Eqs. H1-1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
30
15
Pn based on KL(3)
(1) Includes first-order analysis with amplifiers (2) Minimum notional load of 0.002 Yi is required for gravity load only combinations (3) K = 1 allowed if sidesway amplifier B2 = 2/1 < 1.1 (4) Out-of-plumbness o / L = 0.002 may be used in lieu of notional load (5) b = 4 (Pu/Py) (1 Pu/Py) (6) If Pu < 0.01PeL of if a member out-of-straightness of 0.001L or the equivalent notional loading is included, Pn = QPy (LRFD)
CEE 6554, Column Strength
31
32
16
Example Beam-Columns
33
34
17
35
Nominal strength curves by distributed plasticity analysis versus AISC (2005) ELM
0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 P/Py 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 0 0.2 0.4 HL/Mp 0.6 0.8 1 AISC (2005) Effective Length Distributed plasticity analysis, major-axis Distributed plasticity analysis, minor axis
36
18
Cantilever Example
800
Pr H = 0.01Pr
700 600 500 400
cPy
Effective Length
cPn(KLi)
Direct Analysis
14'-8"
(a)
(b)
37
38
19