Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
THE SURAT PEOPLES CO.OP.BANK COLLEGE OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, UDHNA, SURAT 2011-12
UDHNA CITIZEN COMMERCE COLLEGE & S.P.B. COLLEGE OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION &
UDHNA ACADEMY COLLEGE OF COMPUTER APPLICATION & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
(Self Financed College Affiliated To VNSGU, Surat) (Managed By Udhna Academy Education Trust, Udhna) 214, Ranchhodnagar, Opp. Swaminarayan Temple, Surat-Navsari Road, Udhna, Surat 394 210
(B.B.A. Programme)
Phone :
E-Mail ID : Website :
(B.Com. : uccbcc_uaet@rediffmail.com ) (B.B.A. : spbcba@gmail.com) (B.C.A.: uaccait@gmail.com) www.udhna-academy-edu-trust.org B.Com.: NAAC Accredited B (CGPA 2.67) 2009 =============================================================================================== Ref: Date: ===============================================================================================
CERTIFICATE This is to certify that Mr. Chirag R. Patel has prepared the Project Report entitled
Comparative Study between Spectacles & Lenses among Youth with Reference to Surat City under my guidance & supervision. This project embodies the result of his work & is of the standard expected of a candidate for the successful completion of Bachelor of Business Administration Degree.
II
DECLARATION
I, the undersigned, Mr. Chirag R. Patel here by, declare that this dissertation titled Comparative Study between Spectacles & Lenses among Youth with Reference to Surat City is an original and bonafide work carried out under the guidance of Mr. Hormaz D. Patel, Assistant Professor, The Surat Peoples Co-Op Bank College of Business Administration, Udhna, Surat.
The empirical findings in this report are based on the data collected and have not been taken from any other reports.
This dissertation does not form any basis for other degree or diploma.
__________________________ Mr. Chirag R. Patel BBA Roll No. 29 Date: Place: Surat
III
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The satisfaction and euphoria that accompany the successful completion of any task would be incomplete without the mention of the Leaders, whose constant guidance and encouragement crown all the efforts with success. I am highly obliged to the South Gujarat University for arranging the programme of practical training in Bachelor of Business Administration such a manner. I would like to extend my gratitude to Mr. Prakash Lakhani, who provided me useful information and data regarding the subject with their cent percent participation and supported in making this project report a successful task. It was a memorable experience to work with them and complete my winter training. It is my privilege to express my deep sense of gratitude to Mr. Hormaz D. Patel for his efforts, guidance, valuable comments and suggestions for making this project report. He helped me to complete my report on the practical study and gave contribution to improve and expand my practical knowl edge. Finally, I express my intense gratitude to my parents whose blessings and helped me to translate my efforts into fruitful achievement. in
IV
INDEX SR NO.
I II III IV 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
TOPIC
CERTIFICATE (From College) DECLARATION ACKNOWLEDGEMENT INDEX INDUSTRY PROFILE COMPANY PROFILE CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK RESEARCH METHODOLOGY DATA ANALYSIS & INTERPRETATION FINDINGS & CONCLUSIONS SUGGESTIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS Bibliography Annexure
PAGE NO.
II III IV V 1 16 28 50 55 84 86
sensitive goods. Trade as a % of GDP has risen from 13% in 1991 to nearly 30.2% in 2005-06. The total cumulative foreign direct investment (FDI) received into India up to March 2007 was US$ 54.63 billion, of which Italys share is about 1.2%. The monetary unit of India is Indian Rupee (1 Indian Rupee = 100 paise). The exchange rate of Indian Rupee is Euro 1 = Rs. 63.20 and US$ 1 = Rs. 40.45 (March 2008 - Reserve Bank of India). Demographics: India is a unique market on account of its diversity in age, income, and urbanrural demographics. Nearly 58 million households, comprising 32.3% of Indias dwelling units, live in urban areas. Nearly 38% of urban households are in middle and higher income strata, and only 14% of rural households have similar income levels. Income Classification: Even though the population is more than 1.1 billion, the real consuming class of 300 million people outnumbers several of the worlds large markets in terms of market potential. Of these, around 150 million people (2 million very rich and 30 million rich households) represent the consuming potential, particularly for lifestyle goods and services. o There are close to 80,000 high net worth Individuals in India, with saving and assets exceeding US$1 million. o At least 50,000 households buy premium cars every year (priced at US$ 30,000 and above). o The market for luxury goods is estimated to be Rs 100 billion, with over 2 million Indians estimated to be engaging in some luxury purchase or the other each year. Main Cities: Mumbai, Kolkata, Delhi, Hyderabad and Chennai are the most populated and wealthiest cities, closely followed by Bangalore, Ahmedabad, Pune, Vadodara and Kanpur. The top seven cities Mumbai, Delhi, Chennai, Kolkata, Hyderabad, Ahmedabad and Bangalore, together have over 6 million homes falling in the upper socio-economic strata. Age-group distribution: India is a very young nation with 85% of its population below the age of 45, and 55% of its people below 25 years of age. Young adults, the group between 20 and 35 years, represent nearly 25% of the consumer base in the country, and drive consumer and lifestyle trends.
Health & Vision Care indicators: o Life expectancy at birth Male/Female (years) : 61.0/63.0 o Total health expenditure per capita (2003): US$82 (4.8% of GDP) o 360 million Indians above the age of 35 need near vision correction [for reading]. o 386 million Indians require spectacles every year (NOA) o Average rate of spectacles replacement 3 years o Due to the geographical location of India and global warming very large number of people require protection from harmful UV rays of the sun.
Category
IOLs Lasik
$ Billion
0.83 1.3
Spectacle Lenses & Frames 24.0 Spectacle Lenses & Frames 24.0 Contact Lenses 5 Sunglasses 4.9 Contact Lenses 5 Sunglasses 4.9
Lens Cleaning Solutions etc. 1.6 Lens Cleaning Solutions etc. 1.6
4% 13% 16% ICLs 5% 11% Lasik Spectacdelense Frames Sunglasses Contact Lenses 51%
Sunglasses: Luxottica acquired the Ray-Ban manufacturing plant at Bhiwadi in Rajasthan, India. GKB Rx Lens Pvt. Ltd. launched a contemporary range of designer sunglasses in the Indian market in March 2004 through sourcing arrangements with design and production houses in Italy and Germany. Titan, one of the leading Indian companies in the sunglasses segment, has set up manufacturing units abroad though design facilities are located in India. Spectacle Frames: Indias largest concentration of spectacle frame manufacturers is in the state of Gujarat, manufacturing 20,000 frames daily. Most of the Indian manufacturers are small and use same concept and technology, as foreign companies (sheet cutting, ring forming, pressing, screw forming, hinge manufacture and assembling) but cannot afford hi-tech machines. They use local machines costing Euro 5000 to 7000, designed using reverse engineering, against foreign machines costing over Euro 1 million.
feature low-quality plastic lenses. A large variety of unbranded sunglasses are also available in this segment.
distributors. Retailers often carry more than one brand in each product category, except in the case of single brand outlets (about 7% of all retail outlets for optical products). Most retailers carry a wide range and multiple brands of products (frames, lenses, contact lenses, cleaning solution etc.) with average stock of 75 to 100 units. The retailers have reported a positive growth outlook in the coming years, projecting a 30%+ growth in business for frames, sunglass and contact lenses. The frequency of supply ranges from once to twice a month depending upon the product and size of the retail outlet. The retailers expect a credit against supplies, which varies widely from one week to 6 months.
o All foreign companies having existing previous joint venture/technology transfer/royalty agreements require prior approval before setting another venture in the same field. All foreign investments are fully reparable for both profit as well as principal values, subject to payment of applicable Indian taxes and obtaining due clearances from the Reserve Bank of India. TECHNOLOGY AGREEMENTS Foreign technology agreements, including licensing rights, lump sum payments and royalty payments are allowed on an automatic approval basis provided the value of the lump sum does not exceed US$ 2 million, royalties do not exceed 5% of net domestic sales or 8% of FOB exports, and the total value of payments over a seven- year production period is below 8% of the total revenues of the company receiving the knowhow. Foreign companies are also entitled to receive royalties on account of licensing fee, brand name rights, etc., up to 1% of net sales from their Indian subsidiaries or ventures even without a technology transfer agreement, on an automatic approval basis. EXPORT FISCAL INCENTIVES AND CONCESSIONS India offers an attractive scheme of incentives on exports, especially through its Export Oriented Unit (EOU) Schemes. The most important provisions concerning EOUs are exemption of import duty on all capital goods, raw materials and consumables, sales in the domestic market (subject to value addition requirements) at a lower customs duty, exemption from income tax on profits until April 2010.
10
11
12
Italian companies now have various options for entry to the Indian market manufacturing (joint venture or on their own), technology licensing, franchising, branded retailing etc.
13
Further, branded eyewear has very limited penetration in the Indian market at present, but it is increasing. Key market characteristics o India is a highly price sensitive market though demand for premium/ branded goods is rapidly increasing, at a faster rate vis--vis the overall market. o Mid price segment is most promising, with large volumes and decent margins o Low end segment has high inspirational value and would like to move up the value chain o Medium and small sized cities are fast emerging has high potential markets for life style products Market segmentation and positioning is important as the expectations and paying capacities differ across consumer segments in India. Therefore, new entrants should preferably offer different products/brands for different segments giving price value equation, using both exclusive and multi brand outlets. Favorable Perception of Italian Optical Products History and parentage is an important reinforce for new international brands being introduced in India. Success of European brands in India is to an extent because traditionally, Europe is considered the face of fashion. Retailers, importers and distributors, rate Italian products as superior compared to other imported products and Indian products. Even among the ophthalmologists, the perception about Italian optical products is better or comparable to other imported products. It is important to highlight here that retailers and ophthalmologists play an important and influential role in the consumers decision in selection of products and the brand. Therefore, their positive perception about Italian products, in spite of overall market share being low at present, will provide a head start for Italian companies entering the Indian market. Market Segments: Currently, spectacle lenses and sunglasses offer the maximum potential, both in terms of size and growth rates. In both the segments, even though the upper end may be growing faster, it is miniscule compared to mid and low segments, which have huge unmet demand and aspiration levels. It would be crucial to position the product properly.
14
There is only limited production of contact lenses in India, and only three international brands Bausch & Lomb, J&J and Ciba are being marketed. Also the market at present is small, but growing fast as the prices come down. There is scope for a mid-range brand/ product that could be a window of opportunity for Italian companies. Partnerships: Opportunity for Italian companies to partner with the existing small and medium sized who typically have limited resources for expanding/upgrading their operations, but understand the Indian market dynamics. Going by the model successfully used by other international brands, Italian companies planning to enter the Indian market should consider tying up with an Indian Importer-Distributor, for handling all import related formalities, and managing the logistics, retail network and promotion. Another emerging option is to tie-up with major retail chains, to have an exclusive or preferential presence across their retail outlets. While this route promises scale and reach, the margins tend to be lower. Promotion: Local adaptation needs to manifest in communications, language, promotions, selection of brand ambassadors, and in the product attributes themselves. The positive perceptions about Italian optical products should be capitalized in the promotions. Roll out: Mumbai is considered to be the most interesting city to launch premium end products, being the commercial capital of India, with the largest concentration of business families and overall high disposable incomes. Mumbai is also the fashion and glamour capital of India, and home to Bollywood, the Indian film industry. In addition to Mumbai, Delhi NCR, Chennai, Hyderabad and Bangalore are also important markets, given the large corporate working class and also a predisposition to indulgence in personal care and fashion. Therefore, while a new player should begin with launch in one city, it should plan to expand its market coverage to other important cities within the first two-three years of launch.
15
Ray-Ban is an American high end manufacturer of sunglasses, founded in 1937 by Bausch & Lomb. They were introduced for the United States Army Air Corps. In 1999, Bausch & Lomb sold the brand to the Italian Luxottica Group for a reported $640 million.
2.1.1 HISTORY
Ray-Bans were first created in 1936. The idea of Ray Bans began some years earlier when Lieutenant John A. Macready returned from a balloon flying adventure and complained that the sun had permanently damaged his eyes. He contacted Bausch & Lomb asking them to create sunglasses that would provide protection and also look elegant. On May 7, 1937, Bausch & Lomb took out the patent. The prototype, known as Anti-Glare, had an extremely light frame weighing 150 grams. They were made of gold-plated metal with green lenses made of mineral glass to filter out infrared and ultraviolet rays. Pilots in the United States Army Air Corps immediately adopted the sunglasses. The army had intentions to have sunglasses that would protect the soldiers from the rays of the sun but yet still have an elegant look. The Ray-Ban Aviator became a well-known style of sunglasses when General Douglas MacArthur landed on the beach in the Philippines in World War II, and photographers snapped several pictures of him wearing them. Ray Bans were quickly seen outside of just the army. In 1937, Ray Ban made their first patent on the Ray Ban Aviator sunglasses. Ray Bans quickly gained popularity through other wars and even made a debut in the movies. In 1952, Ray Ban created another style, the Ray Ban Wayfarer. The difference with these sunglasses was the plastic frames. This design of the
16
Wayfarer glasses became very popular with the public. The Wayfarer sunglasses were seen on movie stars, TV stars, and musicians. Ray Ban still remains a top designer in the sunglasses industry with their constant change in color, frames, and lenses.
2.1.3 LENSES
Ray Ban has created a number of different lenses for each of their glasses. Each of the lenses is designed to suit every life style. The High Contrast Brown Lenses are made for a military design that allows for the maximum amount of clarity and protection. These lenses are made to block out blue light and most commonly used for driving and action sports. The Neutral Grey lenses are recommended for reduced eye strain and to see color as it truly is. Polarized lenses were created to reduce the amount of reflected light into your eyes. Lastly, Light Adaptive lenses are designed to adjust to all different amounts of light. The lenses will turn dark when excessive light is present and lighter when there is not as lighter.
17
Kaenon Polarized is a luxury performance polarized sunglasses and lens brand based in Newport Beach, CA. The company was founded in 2001 by elite sailors, and brothers, Steve and Darren Rosenberg. Specializing in performance sunglasses, all Kaenon Polarized sunglasses feature the company's proprietary SR-91 polarized lens material.
18
2.3 LUXOTTICA
Luxottica Group S.p.A. is the world's largest eyewear company. Its best known brands include Ray-Ban, Persol and Oakley, Inc.. It also makes sunglasses and prescription frames for a multitude of designer brands such as Chanel and Prada, whose designs and trademarks are used under license. Luxottica also makes sunglasses branded Burberry, Polo Ralph Lauren, Stella McCartney, Tiffany, Versace, Vogue, Miu Miu, Tory Burch and Donna Karan. Its prime competitor is the Safilo Group S.p.A
2.3.1 HISTORY
Leonardo Del Vecchio started the company in 1961, in Agordo north of Belluno, Italy; today the company is headquartered in Milan.
19
Del Vecchio began his career as the apprentice to a tool and die maker in Milan, but decided to turn his metalworking skills to making spectacle parts. So in 1961 he moved to Agordo in the province of Belluno, which is home to most of the Italian eyewear industry. The new company was Luxottica s.a.s., a limited partnership with Del Vecchio as one of the founding partners. In 1967 he started selling complete eyeglass frames under the Luxottica brand, which proved successful enough that by 1971 he ended the contract manufacturing business. Convinced of the need for vertical integration, in 1974 he acquired Scarrone, a distribution company. In 1981 the company set up its first international subsidiary, in Germany, the first in a rapid period of international expansion. The first of many licensing deals with a designer was struck with Armani, in 1988. The company listed in New York in 1990, and in Milan in December 2000, joining the MIB-30 (now S&P/MIB) index in September 2003. The listing raised money for the company and allowed it to use its shares to acquire other brands, starting with Italian brand Vogue in 1990, Persol and US Shoe Corporation (LensCrafters) in 1995, Ray-Ban in 1999 and Sunglass Hut, Inc. in 2001. Luxottica later increased its presence in the retail sector by acquiring Sydney-based OPSM in 2003, Pearle Vision and Cole National in 2004.. The company also acquired Oakley in a US$2.1bn deal in November 2007, and in August 2011 Erroca for 20 million.
2.3.2 RETAIL
Luxottica Retail has 7.000 retail locations in the United States, Canada, China, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, Israel and the United Kingdom. The headquarters of the retail division is in Mason, Ohio. Their retail banners include: Sunglass Hut International, LensCrafters, OPSM, Laubman & Pank, Budget Eyewear, Bright Eyes, Pearle Opticians, Pearle Vision, Surfeyes, Sears Optical, Target Optical, BJ's Optical, Cole Vision Care, ICON, Optical Shop of Aspen and ILORI. They also own EyeMed Vision Care, a managed vision care organization in the United States.
20
21
Costa Del Mar Sunglasses, Inc. is a designer and manufacturer of high-end polarized sunglasses for use in sports such as fishing, sailing, and surfing. It was founded in 1983 and is headquartered in Daytona Beach, Florida. Costa Del Mar products are sold via the Costa Del Mar Online Store, other online dealers, or stores located worldwide.
2.4.1 HISTORY
Costa Del Mar was founded in 1983, the same year that a NOAA nature sanctuary asked the company for a donation of polarized sunglasses. The first style of sunglasses released by Costa Del Mar was called "Catalina," which is no longer in production. The first lens developed by Costa Del Mar was The Costa 400 in CR-39 material. In 1986, Costa Del Mar created The Costa 400 in a glass lens. The company provided sunglasses to Jacques Cousteau and the Cousteau Society, and lenses for the team-issue frames of the F-16C Eastern Demo Team. Additionally, Costa Del Mar launched its premium lens, The Costa 580 in August 2000. On April 22, 2003, A. T. Cross bought Costa Del Mar Sunglasses. Today, the list of pro guides and outdoor personalities that use Costa Del Mar sunglasses includes Jose Wejebe, Cindy Garrison, and Blair Wiggins.
22
2.4.2 TECHNOLOGY
Costa Del Mar provides 52 styles and 8 lens options of polarized eyewear, and 18 frame colors. The lenses are manufactured in three different materials: CR-39, Glass, and Polycarbonate. Each of these lenses offer different attributes mainly focused on durability, optical clarity, and scratch resistance. Every lens made by Costa Del Mar is 100% Polarized and offers 100% UVA, UVB, and UVC protection. Costa Del Mar offers two quality lenses. The Costa 400 is offered in all three lens materials, and it eliminate glare at 400 nanometer mark. This allows for clearer vision & reduces strain on eyes. The Costa 580 is Costa Del Mar's premium lens collection. This lens eliminates glare at the 580 nanometer mark. Specifically, it significantly reduces the amount of yellow light that penetrates the lens; yellow light is the hardest light for the eye to process. This nearly completely eliminates glare, allowing enhanced color saturation and definition. Some of the frame styles also offer C-Mates, a bifocal lens. It is offered in +1.75 and +2.5 magnification. Costa Del Mar sunglasses can also be made with prescription lenses. All of Costa Del Mar's sunglasses are produced in Japan China, Mauritius, or Taiwan, while its headquarters are located in Daytona Beach, Florida. Older models were produced in the US.
2.5 PERSOL
Persol is an Italian luxury eyewear company specializing in sunglasses. The name is derived from "per il sole," which, in Italian, means "for the sun." Formed in 1917 by Giuseppe Ratti, Persol originally catered to pilots and sports drivers. Presently, the company is famous for its durable sports sunglasses. Its trademark is the silver arrow (often referred to as the "Supreme Arrow"), and several of the company's glasses feature this symbol. Persol was a heavy influence in the production of sunglasses. The company developed the first flexible stem. This flexible stem system is known as the patented Meflecto system and was one of the first spring hinges ever developed for eyewear. Persol was introduced to the United States in 1962. Its first boutique opened on Rodeo Drive in Los Angeles in 1991. It is currently owned by the Luxottica group. Currently all "plastic" Persol eyewear is hand crafted in Italy using cellulose acetate, a hypoallergenic material derived from cotton. Steve McQueen popularized two Persol models: the 714 folding sunglasses and closely styled 649. He wore a special pair of 714's with blue lenses in The Thomas Crown Affair and was often photographed wearing the 649 model. Persol models 2244-S and 2720-S were both worn by Daniel Craig in the James Bond film Casino Royale. Pierce Brosnan wore Persol model 2672-S as James Bond in the film Die Another Day and then Persol model 2720-S in Mamma Mia! Don Johnson wore a Persol 69218 during Season Three of Miami Vice. Persol sunglasses have also been used in other movies, Bill Murray can be seen wearing them in both Lost in Translation and Broken Flowers. One of the most iconic images of Persol sunglasses can be seen in the movie Divorce Italian Style where Marcello Mastroianni wears a pair of black 649s; Mastroianni also has a pair of Persol sunglasses on in almost every scene in the movie La Dolce Vita. In addition Nicolas Cage wears them in Lord of War. Robert Culp, as Kelly Robinson, in the iconic I SPY TV series in the 1960s sported Persols 2656S in many episodes.
24
2.7.1 HISTORY
Randolph Engineering, Inc. was founded in 1972 by Jan Waszkiewicz and Stanley Zaleski. Ironically, the company originally focused on designing and manufacturing optical tools and machinery for the production of eye-wear. Waszkiewicz and Zaleski designed and made most of the machinery in the plant. In time, the company turned its attention to making its own eyewear, using the tools and machinery designed and manufactured by the company itself. In 1977, Randolph Engineering obtained its first government contract. By 1982, they became the prime contractor for military-style aviation flight glasses for the U.S. Department of Defense. With 68 employees, 200,000 pairs of sunglasses were made for the Navy, Air Force, and Army that year. Ever since, they have provided eye-wear for many government agencies and soldiers, ranging from sunglasses for air force pilots to eye-wear for submarine staff. In the early 1990s, sales were expanded to offer commercial lines of products. Towards August 2008, the company extended its eye-wear offerings to other specialty lines of work including police, security, outdoor sports and adventure, and other sight critical careerists and hobbyists. The company still supplies the military with a variety of glasses. They signed contracts with the Defense Logistics Agency on January 11, 2010 and January 5, 2011 worth $9 million each. Their most recent contract, valued at $38,662,664, was issued on December 23, 2011. In 2011, the company had approximately $8 million in sales. All glasses are still made at the U.S. location in Randolph, Massachusetts using only a handful of international components. Sales are handled through their website and world-wide distributors. Randolph Engineering has positioned themselves as a viable vendor to other Air Forces around the world including Australia, Belgium, Israel, and Jordan. The Alliance for the Commonwealth
26
and the Massachusetts Port Authority awarded Randolph the 1997 Massachusetts Product Export Achievement Award in recognition for achievements made in International trade.
2.7.2 PRODUCT
Randolph Engineering produces shooting eye-wear, sunglasses, and prescription eye-wear. Their products come in a variety of lens and frame styles, the most popular being the traditional aviator style. Each pair of sunglasses is made nearly entirely by hand in a detailed 200 step process. Averages of 53,000 pairs of glasses are produced per month. All manufacturing processes take place at the companys 22,000-square-foot facility in the United States. Randolph Engineering has three categories of products: the Sunglass Series, Ranger Series, and Rx Series. Randolph Engineering also produces their own high-strength solder flux, and every pair of their glasses comes with a lifetime replacement guarantee for every solder joint. Navy pilots and Army helicopter pilots both wear Randolphs matte chrome 52mm Aviators. In 2011, Randolph Engineering also began production of the Michael Bastian Signature Series. Today products are sold in over 400 retailers globally and compete with brands like Ray-Ban and Oakley.
27
magnification dates back to the 1st century AD, when Seneca the Younger, a tutor of Emperor Nero of Rome, wrote: "Letters, however small and indistinct, are seen enlarged and more clearly through a globe or glass filled with water". Nero (reigned 5468 AD) is also said to have watched the gladiatorial games using an emerald as a corrective lens. The use of a convex lens to form a magnified image is discussed in Alhazen's Book of Optics (1021). Its translation into Latin from Arabic in the 12th century was instrumental to the invention of eyeglasses in 13th century Italy. Englishman Robert Grosseteste's treatise De iride , written between 1220 and 1235, mentions using optics to "read the smallest letters at incredible distances". A few years later, Roger Bacon is also known to have written on the magnifying properties of lenses in 1262. Sunglasses, in the form of flat panes of smoky quartz, were used in China in the 12th century. Similarly, the Inuit have used snow goggles for eye protection. However, they did not offer any corrective benefits and the use by historians of the term "sunglasses" is anachronistic before the twentieth century.
INVENTION OF EYEGLASSES
The first eyeglasses were made in Italy at about 1286, according to a sermon delivered on February 23, 1306 by the Dominican friar Giordano da Pisa (ca. 1255 - 1311): "It is not yet twenty years since there was found the art of making eyeglasses, which make for good vision ... And it is so short a time that this new art, never before extant, was discovered ... I saw the one who first discovered and practiced it, and I talked to him." Giordano's colleague Friar Alessandro della Spina of Pisa (d. 1313) was soon making eyeglasses. The Ancient Chronicle of the Dominican Monastery of St. Catherine in Pisa records: "Eyeglasses, having first been made by someone else, who was unwilling to share them, he made them and shared them with everyone with a cheerful and willing heart." By 1301, there were guild regulations in Venice governing the sale of eyeglasses. Although there have been claims that Salvino D'Armate of Florence invented eyeglasses, these claims have been exposed as hoaxes. Furthermore, although there have been claims that Marco Polo encountered eyeglasses during his travels in China in the 13th century, no such statement
29
appears in his accounts. Indeed, the earliest mentions of eyeglasses in China occur in the 15th century and those Chinese sources state that eyeglasses were imported. Seated apostle holding lenses in position for reading. Detail from Death of the Virgin, by the Master of Heiligenkreuz, ca. 140030. The earliest pictorial evidence for the use of eyeglasses is Tommaso da Modena's 1352 portrait of the cardinal Hugh de Provence reading in a scriptorium. Another early example would be a depiction of eyeglasses found north of the Alps in an altarpiece of the church of Bad Wildungen, Germany, in 1403. These early spectacles had convex lenses that could correct both hyperopia (farsightedness), and the presbyopia that commonly develops as a symptom of aging. It was not until 1604 that Johannes Kepler published the first correct explanation as to why convex and concave lenses could correct presbyopia and myopia.
LATER DEVELOPMENTS
The American scientist Benjamin Franklin, who suffered from both myopia and presbyopia, invented bifocals. Serious historians have from time to time produced evidence to suggest that others may have preceded him in the invention; however, a correspondence between George Whatley and John Fenno, editor of The Gazette of the United States, suggested that Franklin had indeed invented bifocals, and perhaps 50 years earlier than had been originally thought. The first lenses for correcting astigmatism were constructed by the British astronomer George Airy in 1825. Over time, the construction of spectacle frames also evolved. Early eyepieces were designed to be either held in place by hand or by exerting pressure on the nose (pince-nez). Girolamo Savonarola suggested that eyepieces could be held in place by a ribbon passed over the wearer's head, this in turn secured by the weight of a hat. The modern style of glasses, held by temples passing over the ears, was developed some time before 1727, possibly by the British optician Edward Scarlett. These designs were not immediately successful, however, and various styles with attached handles such as "scissors-glasses" and lorgnettes were also fashionable from the second half of the 18th century and into the early 19th century.
30
In the early 20th century, Moritz von Rohr at Zeiss (with the assistance of H. Boegehold and A. Sonnefeld), developed the Zeiss Punktal spherical point-focus lenses that dominated the eyeglass lens field for many years. Despite the increasing popularity of contact lenses and laser corrective eye surgery, glasses remain very common, as their technology has improved. For instance, it is now possible to purchase frames made of special memory metal alloys that return to their correct shape after being bent. Other frames have spring-loaded hinges. Either of these designs offers dramatically better ability to withstand the stresses of daily wear and the occasional accident. Modern frames are also often made from strong, light-weight materials such as titanium alloys, which were not available in the earlier times.
they reduce the overlap of the blur circles in the image, clarifying the vision somewhat. They do not heal the eye of refractive error, as sometimes claimed, and vision with pinhole glasses, although clearer than without them, is not as clear as with conventional lenses. Correcting one's vision is effected by use of lenses to move the focal point on the retina accordingly with one's particular needs. The depth of the curve, the thickness of the lens, and the precise shape of the lens can all be used to change the focal point. Eyeglasses can normally correct and compensate for four types of vision deficiencies: o Myopia is a vision disorder that causes far objects to appear blurred but near objects are seen clearly. Individuals suffering from myopia are prescribed eyeglasses with concave lenses, which compensate for the refraction error by moving the image of the distant objects that cannot be seen clearly backward onto the retina. o Correcting hyperopia is normally done with eyeglasses with convex lenses. With this disorder, the patients can see distant objects clearly but they have trouble with seeing objects that are close to them. Eyeglasses with convex lenses compensate for the refraction errors by moving the image of a distant object forward onto the retina. o Astigmatism is typically corrected with a cylindrical lens. This disorder is caused by a nonuniform curvature in the refractive surfaces of the eye, which leads to an abnormality in focusing the light rays on the retina. As a result, a part of the light rays are focused on the retina and the other part is focused behind it or in front of it. o Presbyopia is a condition where the eye exhibits a progressively diminished ability to focus on near objects with age. It is more frequent in people over 40 years old and it is corrected with convex lenses. These patients need reading or bifocal eyeglasses. Corrective eyeglasses can significantly improve the life quality of the patient as they are helpful in both correcting vision disorders and reducing problems that appear when such lenses are needed, such as headaches or squinting. Corrective lenses can also be added to work masks or eyeglasses used in sports. Eyeglass lenses are commonly made from plastic, including CR-39 and polycarbonate. These materials reduce the danger of breakage and weigh less than glass lenses. Some plastics also have more advantageous optical properties than glass, such as better transmission of visible light
32
and greater absorption of ultraviolet light. Some plastics have a greater index of refraction than most types of glass; this is useful in the making of corrective lenses shaped to correct various vision abnormalities such as myopia, allowing thinner lenses for a given prescription. Scratch-resistant coatings can be applied to most plastic lenses giving them similar scratch resistance to glass. Hydrophobic coatings designed to ease cleaning are also available, as are anti-reflective coatings intended to reduce glare, improve night vision and make the wearer's eyes more visible.
SAFETY
Safety glasses are usually made with shatter-resistant plastic lenses to protect the eye from flying debris. Although safety lenses may be constructed from a variety of materials of various impact resistance, certain standards suggest that they maintain a minimum 1 millimeter thickness at the thinnest point, regardless of material. Safety glasses can vary in the level of protection they provide. For example, those used in medicine may be expected to protect against blood splatter while safety glasses in a factory might have stronger lenses and a stronger frame with additional shields at the temples to protect from sawdust, flying wood, or metal. The lenses of safety glasses can also be shaped for correction. The American National Standards Institute has established standard ANSI Z87.1 for safety glasses in the United States, and similar standards have been established elsewhere. OSHA provides guidance on the type of safety eyewear that should be used for an application. Some safety glasses are designed to fit over corrective glasses or sunglasses. They may provide less eye protection than goggles or other forms of eye protection, but their light weight increases the likelihood that they will actually be used. Modern safety glasses tend to be given a more stylish design in order to encourage their use. Corrective glasses with plastic lenses can be used in place of safety glasses in many environments; this is one advantage that they have over contact lenses. There are also safety glasses for welding, which are styled like wraparound sunglasses, but with much darker lenses, for use in welding where a full sized welding helmet is inconvenient or uncomfortable. These are often called "flash goggles", because they provide protection from welding flash.
33
Worker safety eyewear is available in various lens colors and/or with coatings to protect or enable eyesight in different lighting conditions, particularly when outdoors. Nylon frames are usually used for protection eyewear for sports because of their lightweight and flexible properties. They are able to bend slightly and return to their original shape instead of breaking when pressure is applied to them. Nylon frames can become very brittle with age and they can be difficult to adjust. Safety lenses are usually made of polycarbonate. Polycarbonate and Trivex lenses are the lightest and most shatter-resistant, making them the best for impact protection, though polycarbonate offers poor optics due to high dispersion, having a low Abbe number of 31. Safety glasses are also available in prescription form for those persons who need corrective lenses. Depending on the particular area in which the individuals work, they may be required to wear side protectors additionally to safety eyeglasses. In order to comply with the ANSI Z87.1 requirements, safety eyeglasses must pass the high velocity and high mass tests. Also, the lenses of protective goggles, faceshield windows and welding filters cannot be thinner than 3 mm, excepting high-impact lenses meant to be installed in prescription frames, which cannot be thinner than 2 mm.
SUNGLASSES
Sunglasses may be made with either prescription or non-prescription lenses that are darkened to provide protection against bright visible light and, possibly, ultraviolet (UV) light. Photochromic lenses, which are photosensitive, darken when struck by UV light. Light polarization is an added feature that can be applied to sunglass lenses. Polarization filters remove horizontally polarized rays of light, which eliminates glare from horizontal surfaces (allowing wearers to see into water when reflected light would otherwise overwhelm the scene). Polarized sunglasses may present some difficulties for pilots since reflections from water and other structures often used to gauge altitude may be removed, or instrument readings on liquid crystal displays may be blocked. Gray or gray-green lenses produce the most natural appearance of colors. Yellow lenses increase color contrast and improve depth perception. They are worn by people driving at dusk, but are detrimental to vision at night. Any tint further reduces incoming light to the retina, and yellow
34
tints also reduce glare-recovery times for night drivers. Brown lenses are common among golfers, but cause color distortion. Blue, purple, and intense green lenses provide less vision enhancement, and are mainly cosmetic.[citation needed] Some sunglasses with interchangeable lenses have optional clear lenses to protect the eyes during low light or night time activities and a colored lens with UV protection for times where sun protection is needed. Sunglasses are often worn just for aesthetic purposes, or simply to hide the eyes. Examples of sunglasses that were popular for these reasons include teashades and mirrorshades. Many blind people wear opaque glasses to hide their eyes for aesthetic reasons.
3D GLASSES
The illusion of three dimensions on a two dimensional surface can be created by providing each eye with different visual information. 3D glasses create the illusion of three dimensions by filtering out the light not intended for that eye, resulting in each eye receiving a different image. The traditional anaglyph 3D glasses have one red lens and one blue or cyan lens. Another kind of 3D glasses uses polarized filters, with one lens using clockwise circular polarization and the other anti-clockwise, with the two images required for stereo vision polarized the same way. Circular polarization is used so the image separation is maintained even if the viewer tilts their head (although the depth effect will suffer as the head tilt increases), which would not be possible with the more usual linear polarizers. Polarized 3D glasses allow for color 3D, while the red-blue lenses produce a dull black-and-white picture with red and blue fringes. Both types have been distributed to audiences at 3D movies. One kind of electronic 3D spectacles uses electronic shutters, while virtual reality glasses & helmets have separate video screens for each eye. A 3D effect can be produced using LCD shutter glasses.
prescription, as determined by an ophthalmologist or optometrist and made by a qualified optician, usually results in better visual correction and fewer headaches & visual discomfort. There have also been many cases where people have delayed having a proper eye examination with an optometrist or ophthalmologist, preferring to purchase off the shelf glasses, which have put their sight at risk from conditions such as AMD, glaucoma and complications from diabetes. It is important to stress off the shelf readers are not a replacement for regular eye examinations. Full reading glasses are more suitable for people who only need them for close-up reading while half-eye reading glasses can be used to read at smaller or larger distances. The reading glasses are most of the time needed by people who have never worn glasses. Although specialists recommend individuals who need to wear eyeglasses to have them custommade according to their own needs, most of the patients prefer buying them at a pharmacy or department store. This type of eyeglass-shopping became very popular in the 1990s when it was estimated that over 30 million pairs were sold per year. These reading glasses are not as expensive as the custom-made ones and they are certainly designed to catch the buyer's eye. Glasses that can be purchased off the shelf are available in a wide variety of colors and designs, suitable for different tastes. One downside of ready-made eyeglasses is that their prescription is the same for each eye. The optical center of each lens is also the same. Yet, most individuals who need reading glasses need different prescriptions in each eye. Wearing ready-made eyeglasses can result in headaches, eyestrain or nausea, and these "side effects" increase with the extent of the prescriptions' mismatch. Another disadvantage is that people with a strong prescription will not find readymade solutions. They usually cannot be found with spherical corrections greater than plus or minus three dioptres, and of course are never corrected for astigmatism. Some feel that it would be possible to obtain a cheap frame for their existing lenses by first purchasing ready-mades; while this may be possible for some, the problem with the idea is twofold; there is no standard for lens shapes, so without resorting to extreme fitting methods like glue, it is unlikely that the right fitting could be found; the ready-mades themselves might have their existing lenses glued in place, so could be difficult to remove.
36
square, horn-rimmed glasses, which are in fact a sophisticated hearing aid that alleviates his deafness by allowing him to "hear" vibrations. Some celebrities have become so associated with their eyeglasses that they continued to wear them even after taking alternate measures against vision problems: United States Senator Barry Goldwater and comedian Drew Carey continued to wear non-prescription glasses after being fitted for contacts and getting laser eye surgery. Other celebrities have used glasses to differentiate themselves from the characters they play, such as Anne Kirkbride, who wears oversized, 1980s-style round horn-rimmed glasses as Deirdre Barlow on the soap opera Coronation Street, and Masaharu Morimoto, who wears glasses to separate his professional persona as a chef from his stage persona as Iron Chef Japanese. In superhero fiction, eyeglasses have become a standard component of various heroes' disguises, allowing them to adopt a nondescript demeanor when they are not in their superhero persona: Superman is well known for wearing 1950s style horm-rimmed glasses as Clark Kent, while Wonder Woman wears either round, Harold Lloyd style glasses or 1970s style bug-eye glasses as Diana Prince.
STYLES
In the 20th century, eyeglasses came to be considered a component of fashion; as such, various different styles have come in and out of popularity. Most are still in regular use, albeit with varying degrees of frequency. o Browline glasses o Bug-eye glasses o Cat eye glasses o GI glasses o Horn-rimmed glasses o Pince nez o Rimless glasses Rare and currently noncommercial variations are rimless and frameless glasses attached to a piercing at the bridge of a wearer's nose. Such glasses have the visual look of the pince-nez.
38
3.2.1 HISTORY
Leonardo Da Vinci is frequently credited with introducing the idea of contact lenses in his 1508 Codex of the eye, Manual D, where he described a method of directly altering corneal power by submerging the eye in a bowl of water. Leonardo, however, did not suggest his idea be used for correcting visionhe was more interested in learning about the mechanisms of accommodation of the eye. Ren Descartes proposed another idea in 1636, in which a glass tube filled with liquid is placed in direct contact with the cornea. The protruding end was to be composed of clear glass, shaped to correct vision; however, the idea was impracticable, since it would make blinking impossible. In 1801, Thomas Young, made a basic pair of contact lenses on the model of Descartes. He used wax to affix water-filled lenses to his eyes. This neutralized his own refractive power. He then corrected for it with another pair of lenses.
39
However, like Leonardo's, Young's device was not intended to correct refraction errors. Sir John Herschel, in a footnote of the 1845 edition of the Encyclopedia Metropolitana, posed two ideas for the visual correction: the first "a spherical capsule of glass filled with animal jelly", and "a mould of the cornea" which could be impressed on "some sort of transparent medium". Though Herschel reportedly never tested these ideas, they were both later advanced by several independent inventors such as Hungarian Dr. Dallos with Istvan Komromy (1929), perfected a method of making molds from living eyes. This enabled the manufacture of lenses that, for the first time, conformed to the actual shape of the eye. It was not until 1887 that a German glassblower, F.E. Muller, produced the first eye covering to be seen through and tolerated. In 1887, the German ophthalmologist Adolf Gaston Eugen Fick constructed and fitted the first successful contact lens. While working in Zrich, he described fabricating afocal scleral contact shells, which rested on the less sensitive rim of tissue around the cornea, and experimentally fitting them: initially on rabbits, then on himself, and lastly on a small group of volunteers. These lenses were made from heavy blown glass and were 1821mm in diameter. Fick filled the empty space between cornea/callosity and glass with a dextrose solution. He published his work, "Contactbrille", in the journal Archiv fr Augenheilkunde in March 1888. Fick's lens was large, unwieldy, and could only be worn for a couple of hours at a time. August Mller in Kiel, Germany, corrected his own severe myopia with a more convenient glass-blown scleral contact lens of his own manufacture in 1888. Also in 1887, Louis J. Girard invented a similar scleral form of contact lens. Glass-blown scleral lenses remained the only form of contact lens until the 1930s when polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA or Perspex/Plexiglas) was developed, allowing plastic scleral lenses to be manufactured for the first time. In 1936, optometrist William Feinbloom introduced plastic lenses, making them lighter and more convenient. These lenses were a combination of glass and plastic. In 1949, the first "corneal" lenses were developed. These were much smaller than the original scleral lenses, as they sat only on the cornea rather than across the entire visible ocular surface, and could be worn up to sixteen hours per day. PMMA corneal lenses became the first contact lenses to have mass appeal through the 1960s, as lens designs became more sophisticated with improving manufacturing (lathe) technology.
40
Early corneal lenses in the 1950s and 1960s were relatively expensive and fragile, resulting in the development of a market for contact lens insurance. Replacement Lens Insurance, Inc. (now known as RLI Corp.) phased out its original flagship product in 1994 after contacts became more affordable and easier to replace. One important disadvantage of PMMA lenses is that no oxygen is transmitted through the lens to the conjunctiva and cornea, which can cause a number of adverse clinical effects. By the end of the 1970s, and through the 1980s and 1990s, a range of oxygen-permeable but rigid materials were developed to overcome this problem. Chemist Norman Gaylord played a prominent role in the development of these newer, permeable contact lenses.[16] Collectively, these polymers are referred to as "rigid gas permeable" or "RGP" materials or lenses. Although all the above lens types sclerals, PMMA lenses and RGPs could be correctly referred to as being "hard" or "rigid", the term hard is now used to refer to the original PMMA lenses, which are still occasionally fitted and worn, whereas rigid is a generic term that can be used for all these lens types: hard lenses (PMMA lenses) are a sub-set of rigid lenses. Occasionally, the term "gas permeable" is used to describe RGP lenses, but this is potentially misleading, as soft lenses are also gas permeable in that they allow oxygen to move through the lens to the ocular surface. The principal breakthrough in soft lenses was made by the Czech chemists Otto Wichterle and Drahoslav Lim who published their work "Hydrophilic gels for biological use" in the journal Nature in 1959. This led to the launch of the first soft (hydrogel) lenses in some countries in the 1960s and the first approval of the Soflens material by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1971. These lenses were soon prescribed more often than rigid lenses, mainly due to the immediate comfort of soft lenses; by comparison, rigid lenses require a period of adaptation before full comfort is achieved. The polymers from which soft lenses are manufactured improved over the next 25 years, primarily in terms of increasing the oxygen permeability by varying the ingredients. In 1972, British optometrist Rishi Agarwal was the first to suggest disposable soft contact lenses. In 1998, an important development was the launch of the first silicone hydrogels onto the market by CIBA VISION in Mexico. These new materials encapsulated the benefits of silicone which has extremely high oxygen permeability with the comfort and clinical performance of the conventional hydrogels which had been used for the previous 30 years. These lenses were
41
initially advocated primarily for extended (overnight) wear although more recently, daily (no overnight) wear silicone hydrogels have been launched. In a slightly modified molecule, a polar group is added without changing the structure of the silicone hydrogel. This is referred to as the Tanaka monomer because it was invented and patented by Kyoichi Tanaka of Menicon Co. of Japan in 1979. Second-generation silicone hydrogels, such as galyfilcon A (Acuvue Advance, Vistakon) and senofilcon A (Acuvue Oasys, Vistakon), use the Tanaka monomer. Vistakon improved the Tanaka monomer even further and added other molecules, which serve as an internal wetting agent. Comfilcon A (Biofinity, CooperVision) was the first third-generation polymer. The patent claims that the material uses two siloxy macromers of different sizes that, when used in combination, produce very high oxygen permeability (for given water content). Enfilcon A (Avaira, CooperVision) is another third-generation material that is naturally wettable. The enfilcon A material is 46% water.
can be done by weighting the bottom of the lens or by using other physical characteristics to rotate the lens back into position. Some toric contact lenses have marks or etchings that can assist the eye doctor in fitting the lens. The first disposable toric lenses were introduced in 2000 by Vistakon. The correction of presbyopia (a need for a reading prescription that is different from the prescription needed for distance) presents an additional challenge in the fitting of contact lenses. Two main strategies exist: multifocal contact lenses and monovision. Multifocal contact lenses are comparable to bifocals or progressive lenses because they have multiple focal points. Multifocal contact lenses are typically designed for constant viewing through the center of the lens, but some designs do incorporate a shift in lens position to view through the reading power (similar to bifocal glasses). Monovision is the use single vision lenses (one focal point per lens) to focus one eye for distance vision (typically the person's dominant eye) and the other eye for near work. The brain then learns to use this setup to see clearly at all distances. A technique called modified monovision uses multifocal lenses and also specializes one eye for distance and one eye for near. Alternatively, a person may simply wear reading glasses over their distance contact lenses.
43
44
including bullous keratopathy, dry eyes, corneal abrasions and erosion, keratitis, corneal edema, descemetocele, corneal ectasis, Mooren's ulcer, anterior corneal dystrophy, and neurotrophic keratoconjunctivitis.Contact lenses that deliver drugs to the eye have also been developed
Soft lenses
While rigid lenses have been around for about 120 years, soft lenses are a much more recent development. The principal breakthrough in soft lenses made by Otto Wichterle led to the launch of the first soft (hydrogel) lenses in some countries in the 1960s and the approval of the "Soflens" daily material (polymacon) by the United States FDA in 1971. Soft lenses are immediately comfortable, while rigid lenses require a period of adaptation before full comfort is achieved. The biggest improvements to soft lens polymers have been increasing oxygen permeability, lens wetability, and overall comfort.
45
In 1998, silicone hydrogels became available. Silicone hydrogels have both the extremely high oxygen permeability of silicone and the comfort and clinical performance of the conventional hydrogels. Because silicone allows more oxygen permeability than water, the oxygen permeability of silicone hydrogels is not tied to the water content of the lens. Lenses have now been developed with so much oxygen permeability that they are approved for overnight wear (extended wear). Lenses approved for daily wear are also available in silicone hydrogel materials and launched. Disadvantages of silicone hydrogels are that they are slightly stiffer and the lens surface can be hydrophobic and less "wettable." These factors can influence the comfort of the lens. New manufacturing techniques and changes to multipurpose solutions have minimized these effects. A surface modification processes called plasma coating alters the hydrophobic nature of the lens surface. Another technique incorporates internal rewetting agents to make the lens surface hydrophilic. A third process uses longer backbone polymer chains that results in less cross linking and increased wetting without surface alterations or additive agents.
Hybrid
A small number of hybrid lenses exist. Typically these lenses consist of a rigid center and a soft "skirt". A similar technique is "piggybacking" of a smaller, rigid lens on the surface of a larger, soft lens. These techniques give the vision corrections benefits of a rigid lens and the comfort benefits of a soft lens.
3) WEAR SCHEDULE
A "daily wear" (DW) contact lens is designed to be worn for one day and removed prior to sleeping. An "extended wear" (EW) contact lens is designed for continuous overnight wear, typically for up to 6 consecutive nights. Newer materials, such as silicone hydrogels, allow for even longer wear periods of up to 30 consecutive nights; these longer-wear lenses are often referred to as "continuous wear" (CW). Extended and continuous wear contact lenses can be worn overnight because of their high oxygen permeability. While awake, the eyes are typically open, allowing oxygen to from the air to dissolve into the tears and pass through the lens to the cornea. While asleep, oxygen is supplied from the blood vessels in the back of the eyelid. A lens that interferes with the passage of oxygen to the cornea can cause corneal hypoxia which can
46
result in many complications, including a corneal ulcer, which has the potential to permanently decrease vision. Extended and continuous wear contact lenses typically transfer 56 times more oxygen than conventional soft lenses, allowing the eye to remain healthy, even when the eyelid is closed. Wearing lenses designed for daily wear overnight has an increased risk for corneal infections, corneal ulcers, and corneal neovascularization. The most common complication of extended wear lenses is giant papillary conjunctivitis (GPC), sometimes associated with a poorly fitting contact lens.
4) REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE
The various soft contact lenses available are often categorized by their replacement schedule. The shortest replacement schedule is single use (1-day or daily disposable) lenses which are disposed of each night. Shorter replacement cycle lenses are commonly thinner and lighter, due to lower requirements for durability against wear and tear, and may be the most comfortable in their respective class and generation. These may be best for patients with ocular allergies or other conditions because it limits deposits of antigens and protein, and is considered the healthiest wear schedule due to the most frequent replacement. Single use lenses are also useful for people who use contacts infrequently, or for purposes (e.g., swimming or other sporting activities) where losing a lens is likely. More commonly, contact lenses are prescribed to be disposed of on a two-week or 4-week basis. Quarterly or annual lenses, which used to be very common, have lost favor because a more frequent replacement allows for increased comfort and fewer on-lens deposits. Rigid gas permeable lenses are very durable and may last for several years without the need for replacement. PMMA hard lenses were very durable, and were commonly worn for 5 to 10 years. Interestingly, a careful analysis of the materials used to manufacture many "daily" disposable lenses show that they are often manufactured from the same material as the longer life disposables (4-week replacement for example), from the same company. Although the materials are the same, the manufacturing processes by which the respective contact lenses are made is what differentiates a "daily disposable" lens from a lens recommended for two-week or 4-week replacement.
47
Contrary to popular belief, replacement schedule is not determined by the Food & Drug Administration (FDA). Replacement schedule is recommended only by the manufacturer of that contact lens. The only FDA-approved measure of contact lens wear is the "wear indication" or "wear schedule" (extended wear or daily wear) as was discussed in the previous section.
5) IMPLANTATION
Some intraocular lenses are known as implantable contact lenses. While these implants are used to correct refractive error, because of their surgical implantation in the eye, they are not true contact lenses.
3.2.3 COMPLICATIONS
Complications due to contact lens wear affect roughly 5% of contact lens wearers each year. Most complications arise when lenses are worn differently than prescribed (improper wear schedule or lens replacement) Sleeping in lenses not designed or approved for extended wear is a common cause of complications. Many people go too long before replacing their lenses, wearing lenses designed for 1, 14, or 30 days of wear for multiple months or years. While this does save on the cost of lenses, it risks permanent damage to the eye and loss of sight. Improper use of contact lenses may affect the eyelid, the conjunctiva, and the various layers of the cornea. Poor lens care can lead to infections by various microorganisms including bacteria, fungi, and Acanthamoeba. Long-term (over 5 years) use of contact lenses may "decrease the entire corneal thickness and increase the corneal curvature and surface irregularity." Long-term wear of rigid contact lens is associated with decreased corneal keratocyte density and increased number of epithelial Langerhans cells. All contact lenses sold in the United States are studied and approved as safe by the FDA when specific wear schedules and replacement schedules are followed.
48
3.3 YOUTH
Youth is the time of life between childhood and adulthood (maturity). Definitions of the specific age range that constitutes youth vary. An individual's actual maturity may not correspond to their chronological age, as immature individuals could exist at all ages.
3.3.1 USAGE
Around the world, the terms "youth", "adolescent", "teenager", "kid", and "young person" are interchanged, often meaning the same thing, occasionally differentiated. Youth generally refers to a time of life that is neither childhood nor adulthood, but rather somewhere in-between. Youth also identifies a particular mindset of attitude, as in "He is very youthful". The term youth is also related to being young. "This world demands the qualities of youth: not a time of life but a state of mind, a temper of the will, a quality of imagination, a predominance of courage over timidity, of the appetite for adventure over the life of ease." - Robert Kennedy Youth is an alternative word to the scientifically-oriented adolescent and the common terms of teen and teenager. Another common title for youth is young person or young people. Population aged under 15 years in 2005 12 August is declared International Youth Day by The United Nations.
49
50
FORMULATING THE RESEARCH PROBLEM CHOICE OF RESEARCH DESIGN DETERMINING SOURCES OF DATA DESIGNING DATA COLLECTION FORMS DETERMINING SAMPLING DESIGN AND SAMPLING SIZE ORGANIZING AND CONDUCTING THE FIELD SURVEY PREPARING THE RESEARCH REPORT
51
52
53
questionnaire includes two types of question that is single choice, multi-choice and rank question.
25%
Yes No
75%
Interpretation: - 25% are visited the eyes specialist and 75% are not.
55
0% 6% 15% Once in a month Twice in a month Thrais in a month More then 3 times in a month
79%
Interpretation: - 79% are visited once in a month, 15% twice in a month, 6% threes in a
month.
56
45.00% 40.00% 35.00% 30.00% 25.00% 20.00% 15.00% 10.00% 5.00% 0.00% always seldom 6.00% 23.00% 30.00% 35.00%
40.00%
Spectacle Lense
never
Interpretation: - 30% are always wear spectacles, 35% seldom, 40% are frequently, 15% are
sometimes and 5% never. 6% are always wearing lenses, 23% are seldom, and 40% are frequently, 21% are sometimes, 10% are never.
57
70.00% 60.00% 60.00% 50.00% 40.00% 30.00% 20.00% 10.00% 0.00% Problem in eye sight For fashion or stayle Due to headache To protect eyes from sunrays & dust 9.00% 4.00% 4.00% 2.00% 27.00% Spectacle Lense 42.00% 52.00%
Interpretation: - 60% are wear spectacles due to problem in eye sight, 27% for fashion or
style, and 9% due to headache are frequently. 42% are wear lenses due to problem in eye sight, 52% for fashion or style.
58
60.00%
58.00%
Interpretation: - 50% are having local spectacles and 50% having branded. 42% are having
local lenses and 58% are branded.
59
60.00% 50.00%
57.00%
41.00% 40.00% 30.00% 20.00% 10.00% 0.00% Less then 500 500 to 700 700 to 1000 More then 1000 11.00% 8.00% 18.00% 17.00% 15.00% 33.00% Spectacle Lense
Interpretation: - 11% are spend < 500 rupees, 33% 5spend 00-700, 41% spend 700-1000 and
15% spend > 1000 rupees on spectacles. 8% are spend < 500 rupees, 18% 5spend 00-700, 57% spend 700-1000 and 17% spend > 1000 rupees on lenses.
60
60.00% 50.00% 40.00% 30.00% 20.00% 10.00% 0.00% Nearer shops 17.00% 37.00%
57.00% 50.00%
26.00%
Spectacle Lense
13.00%
Branded outlets
From malls
Interpretation: - 37% are purchase spectacles from nearer shop, 50% from branded outlets and
13% from malls. 17% are purchase lenses from nearer shop, 57% from branded outlets and 26% from malls.
61
8% 12% 34% 10% Highly Prefer Prefer Neutral Not Prefer Highly Not Prefer 36%
Interpretation: - 34% are highly prefer to spectacles, 36% prefer, 10% neutral, 12% not prefer
8% not highly prefer.
62
16%
14%
Interpretation: - 42% are highly prefer to lenses, 16% prefer, 14% neutral, 16% not prefer
12% not highly prefer.
63
3.90 3.80 3.70 3.60 3.50 3.40 3.30 3.20 3.10 3.00 Spectacles Lense 3.20 3.77
Interpretation: - From weighted average mean method researcher may interpret that most of
respondents are prefer the spectacles.
64
65
Interpretation: - 45% are rate excellent, 33% to good, 5% average, 12% to poor and 5% to
very poor.
66
2%
6%
5% Highly Prefer Prefer 51% Neutral Not Prefer Highly Not Prefer
36%
Interpretation: - 51% are rate excellent, 36% to good, 2% average, 6% to poor and 5% to very
poor.
67
5% 8% 30% 18% Highly Prefer Prefer Neutral Not Prefer Highly Not Prefer
39%
Interpretation: - 30% are rate excellent, 39% to good, 18% average, 8% to poor and 5% to
very poor.
68
2% 2% 11% Highly Prefer 43% Prefer Neutral Not Prefer 42% Highly Not Prefer
Interpretation: - 43% are rate excellent, 42% to good, 2% average, 11% to poor and 2% to
very poor.
69
2% 5% 9% Highly Prefer 39% Prefer Neutral Not Prefer Highly Not Prefer 45%
Interpretation: - 39% are rate excellent, 45% to good, 9% average, 5% to poor and 2% to very
poor.
70
Interpretation: - 45% are rate excellent, 33% to good, 5% average, 12% to poor and 5% to
very poor.
71
12% 9%
20% 51%
Interpretation: - 8% are rate excellent, 51% to good, 20% average, 9% to poor and 12% to
very poor.
72
4.20 4.12
4.14
3.83
3.34 3.30 3.10 Safety comfort ability perishability Availability of colors Design & pattern clarity maintenance 3.24
Interpretation: - From weighted average mean method researcher may interpret that most of
respondents are influenced by comfort ability, design and clarity.
73
10.If you wear lenses then rate the following features of Lenses
Responses Attributes Excellent Safety comfort ability perishability Availability of colors Design & pattern clarity maintenance 5 5 25 44 7 19 37 Good 62 56 51 73 60 86 82 Average 39 21 17 11 31 21 10 Poor 8 19 17 04 13 3 1 Very Poor 18 31 22 00 21 3 2
74
4% 14% 6% Highly Prefer Prefer Neutral 47% 29% Not Prefer Highly Not Prefer
Interpretation: - 4% are rate excellent, 47% to good, 29% average, 6% to poor and 14% to
very poor.
75
4%
24% Highly Prefer Prefer 42% 14% Neutral Not Prefer Highly Not Prefer 16%
Interpretation: - 4% are rate excellent, 42% to good, 16% average, 14% to poor and 24% to
very poor.
76
17%
13%
13%
Interpretation: - 19% are rate excellent, 38% to good, 13% average, 13% to poor and 17% to
very poor.
77
3% 0% 8% 34% Highly Prefer Prefer Neutral Not Prefer Highly Not Prefer 55%
Interpretation: - 34% are rate excellent, 55% to good, 8% average, and 3% to poor.
78
16%
5% Highly Prefer
Interpretation: - 5% are rate excellent, 45% to good, 24% average, 10% to poor and 16% to
very poor.
79
2% 2% 15% 16% Highly Prefer Prefer Neutral Not Prefer Highly Not Prefer 65%
Interpretation: - 15% are rate excellent, 65% to good, 16% average, 2% to poor and 2% to
very poor.
80
1% 8%
1%
28%
62%
Interpretation: - 28% are rate excellent, 62% to good, 8% average, 1% to poor and 1% to very
poor.
81
4.35 4.15 3.95 3.75 3.55 3.35 3.15 2.95 2.75 Safety comfort ability 2.89 3.21 3.30
4.19 3.87
4.14
3.14
clarity
maintenance
Interpretation: - From weighted average mean method researcher may interpret that most of
respondents are influenced by availability of color and maintenance.
82
90.00% 80.00% 70.00% 60.00% 50.00% 40.00% 30.00% 20.00% 10.00% 0.00% Yes No 23.00% 27.00% Spectacles Lense 77.00% 73.00%
Interpretation: - 23% feel problem in spectacles and 73% are not. 77% feel problem in lenses
and 27% are not.
83
6.2 CONCLUSIONS
85
CHAPTER - 8
RECOMMENDATIONS
CHAPTER 8 RECOMMENDATIONS
86
BIBLIOGRAPHY
o Books:
Name Marketing Research: Research Design Business Research Method Statistical Methods Author G.C. Beri Donald R. Cooper & Pamela S. Schindler S P Gupta Publication Tata McGraw-Hill
o Websites:
www.en.wikipedia.org www.ray-ban.com/india www.kaenon.com www.luxottica.com www.costadelmar.com www.persol.com/india www.ic-berlin.de www.randolphsunglasses.com
87
ANNEXURE QUESTIONNAIRE
I, Chirag Patel, student of The Surat Peoples Co. Op. Bank College of Business Administration, Udhana, Surat, is conducting a survey Comparative Study between Spectacles & Lenses among Youth. I will be thankful, if you give proper response to the questions. The information you share with me is only used for academic purpose. Your personal details will be kept strictly confidential.
Thank you for spending your valuable time. Chirag Patel
2) How often do you visit eye specialist? Once in a month Thais in a month Twice in a month More than 3 times in a month
3) Which of following do you wear? Always Seldom Frequently Some Time Never Spectacle Lenses
88
4) For which purpose do you wear spectacles or lenses? Spectacles Problem in eye sight For fashion or style Due to headache To protect eyes from sunrays & dust Other________________________ 5) Which types of spectacles or lenses do you buy? Spectacles Local Branded Lenses Local Branded Lenses Problem in eye sight For fashion or style Due to headache To protect eyes from sunrays & dust Other________________________
6) How much do you spend on spectacles or lenses? Spectacles Less than 500 500 to 700 700 to 1000 More than 1000 Lenses Less than 500 500 to 700 700 to 1000 More then 1000
7) From where do you purchase spectacles or lenses? Spectacles Nearer shops Branded outlets From malls Lenses Nearer shops Branded outlets From malls
89
8) What do you prefer to wear? Highly Prefer Spectacles Lenses Prefer Neutral Not Prefer Highly Not Prefer
9) If you wear Spectacles then rate the following features of spectacles. Excellent Safety Comfort Ability Perishability Availability of Colors Design & Pattern Clarity Maintenance Good Average Poor Very Poor
10) If you wear Spectacles then rate the following features of lenses. Excellent Safety Comfort Ability Perishability Availability of Colors Design & Pattern Clarity Maintenance Good Average Poor Very Poor
90
11) Do you feel any problem in wearing spectacles or lenses? Spectacles Yes No Lenses Yes No
12) If yes then please specify...... ________________________________________________________________ 13) Give your Suggestions
Personal Details Name:Age: Phone No:Address:E-mail ID:Occupation: ______________________________________________ ___ ___________________________ ______________________________________________________ ___________________________
Employed Self employed Student Household
91