Hng dn x l s liu trn SPSS

Cau 1: Lam sach d lieu nh the nao? Loai cac phieu co nhieu o trong?

Cau 2: Xac nh gia tr tin cay cua cac thanh phan trong thang o: Cronbach Alpha

Yeu cau: 2

t nht Alpha >0.6

Corrected Item-Total Correlation >0.4

Item-Total Statistics

W1 W2 W3 W4

Scale Mean if Item Deleted 14.793 14.879 14.929 14.329

Scale Variance if Item Deleted 11.302 10.036 9.880 13.819

Corrected ItemTotal Correlation 0.551 0.654 0.518 0.257

Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted 0.601 0.527 0.620 0.760

Cau 3: phan tch nhan to kham pha EFA.

Yeu cau: kiem tra KMO and Bartlett's Test; ieu kien:
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. >0.5 Cumulative % Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings >50% Initial Eigenvalues: L gi tr phng sai tch ra c ca mi nhn t. V mong mun ca phn tch nhn t l ti a ho phng sai nn gi tr ti thiu ca phng sai l 1. Initial Eigenvalues: >1 Factor loading: >0.4 Pattern Matrix(a) Factor SUP SUP1 T3 SUP3 T1 T2 SUP4 COW4 1 0.820 0.811 0.622 0.583 0.499 0.431 0.287 2 3 4

0.239 0.886

COW3 COW1 COW2 P4 P3 P2 P1 T4 W4 W1 W3 W2

0.833 0.669 0.623 0.893 0.824 0.751 0.709 0.326 0.248

-0.274

0.239 0.776 0.759 0.682

0.244

Cau 4: Lap bang thong ke mo ta

gioi trinh do LDPT trung cap cao dang dai hoc nam 6.22 6.61 6.33 5.35 nu 5.78 7.00 5.10 5.45

Cau 5: Tong hp (cong bien): long trung thanh cua nhan vien; mc o thoa man vi cong viec, ong nghiep, lanh ao, tien lng, c hoi ao tao, thang tien. Transform -> compute trong phan target variables: cong cac bien, chia so lng cac bien.

Cau 6: Kiem nh t-test (1 bien metric, 1 bien non- metric) one sample: so vi ket qua cua nam trc 4.2, nam nay co at mc cai thien ang ke khong? (analyze compare means one sample t - tests)

One-Sample Statistics Std. Error Mean .08219

N sloy 131

Mean 5.7163

Std. Deviation .94070

One-Sample Test Test Value = 4.2 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference sloy t 18.449 df 130 Sig. (2-tailed) .000 Mean Difference 1.51628 Lower 1.3537 Upper 1.6789

Paired sample t-test: Toi thoa man trong quan he vi ong nghiep hn hay thoa man vi lanh ao hn? Thoa man vi lng hn hay thoa man vi cong viec hn? (analyze compare means paired sample t - tests)

 Independent t-tests: nam trung thanh hn hay n trung thanh cao hn? (analyze compare means independent sample t tests Lu : So snh thu nhp bnh qun gia nam v n khng ph hp vi loi kim tra ny, v khc bit v thu nhp bnh qun c th chu nh hng bi cc yu t nh hc vn, ch khng ch chu nh hng ca gii tnh. Trong tnh hung nh vy, nn bo m rng s khc bit cc yu t khc khng lm tng cng hay gim nh s khc bit ng k ca trung bnh.

Group Statistics

Cau 8: Kiem nh Chi bnh phng: bien nh danh. (analyze-nonparametric testschi-square OK) (giong praired t test bien la metric). CBNV thch quan diem thich dong vien vat chat hay tinh than (non metric)? 1. Dong vien vat chat. 2. Dong vien tinh than

10

quandiem Observed N 46 100 146 Test Statistics quandiem 19.973 1 Expected N 73.0 73.0 Residual -27.0 27.0

tinh than vat chat Total

Chi-Square(a) df

Asymp. Sig. .000 a 0 cells (.0%) have expected frequencies less than 5. The minimum expected cell frequency is 73.0.

(phai ln > 5)

ong c vat chat va tinh than khong giong nhau Cau 9 : Kiem nh ty le- phep kiem nh z (giong one sample test- metric bien so) Anh ch mong muon chnh sach nhan s nao can thay oi au tien. Vi 1: lng, 2: thng; 3: anh gia nhan vien; 4: ao tao,v.v 0: khong phai lng Analyze nonparamitric tests binomalnhap gia tr kiem tra: 60% p<0.05.
Binomial Test Category mong doi N Observed Prop. 0.712329 0.287671 1 Test Prop. 0.6 Asymp. Sig. (1-tailed) 0.003135

Group 1 1 104 Group 2 0 42 Total 146 Based on Z Approximation.

So sanh vi 1 gia tr co nh Metric Non-metric One sample Kiem nh z (binominal)

So sanh 2 yeu to cua 1 chu the Paired t- tests Chi- square

So sanh trung bnh-2 chu the Independent t-test

Cau 12: Moi quan he gi ahai bien nh danh- Kiem nh t-test (2 bien non- metric): Co moi quan he gia chc 11

danh/v tr trong cong ty va th t quan tam ve thu nhap?

12

mong muon * chucdanh Crosstabulation Count Truong phong 36 15 16 12 26 105 Chi-Square Tests Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) .198 .213 .303 chucdanh Ban Giam doc 39 7 14 16 18 94

mong muon

thu nhap -so 1 thu nhap -so 2 thu nhap-so 3 thu nhap-so 4 thu nhap-so 5

Nhan vien 62 15 39 19 26 161

Total 137 37 69 47 70 360

Total

Pearson Chi-Square Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases

Value 11.069(a) 10.800 1.061 360

df 8 8 1

a 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9.66.

Cau 10: So sanh trung bnh am ong: Kiem nh ANOVA: (1 bien metric, 1 bien non- metric) theo phan phoi chuan Co s khac biet ve mc o trung thanh theo trnh o hoc van?

13

Test of Homogeneity of Variances strungthanh Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig. 0.454242 3 387 0.714446

Phng sai ong nhat

strungthanh N LDPT Tcap 58 146 Mean 3.962069 3.861644 Std. Deviation 0.610386 0.605522 Std. Error 0.080148 0.050113 95% Confidence Interval for Mean Minimum Lower Bound Upper Bound 3.801576 4.122562 2.6 3.762597 3.960691 2 Maximum 5 5

14

Caodang daihoc+ Total ANOVA strungthanh

33 154 391

3.8 3.509091 3.732481

0.655744 0.663164 0.657847

0.11415 0.053439 0.033269

3.567483 3.403517 3.667072

4.032517 3.614665 3.797889

2.2 1.6 1.6

4.8 4.8 5

Sum of Squares Between Groups Within Groups Total 13.32846 155.449 168.7775

df 3 387 390

Mean Square 4.442821 0.401677

F 11.06068

Sig. 5.56E-07

S khac biet co y ngha thong ke.

Multiple Comparisons Dependent Variable: strungthanh Tukey HSD (I) (J) Mean Difference (Ieducation education J) LDPT

Std. Error

Sig.

TCap

caodang

daihoc+

TCap 0.100425 0.09837 0.737309 caodang 0.162069 0.138194 0.644425 daihoc+ 0.452978 0.097641 2.84E-05 LDPT -0.10043 0.09837 0.737309 caodang 0.061644 0.122161 0.957959 daihoc+ 0.352553 0.073209 1.25E-05 LDPT -0.16207 0.138194 0.644425 TCap -0.06164 0.122161 0.957959 daihoc+ 0.290909 0.121574 0.080128 LDPT -0.45298 0.097641 2.84E-05 TCap -0.35255 0.073209 1.25E-05 caodang -0.29091 0.121574 0.080128 The mean difference is significant at the .05 level.

95% Confidence Interval Lower Upper Bound Bound -0.15339 0.354242 -0.1945 0.51864 0.201042 0.704914 -0.35424 0.153392 -0.25356 0.376846 0.163658 0.541448 -0.51864 0.194502 -0.37685 0.253559 -0.02278 0.604599 -0.70491 -0.20104 -0.54145 -0.16366 -0.6046 0.02278

Cau 11: Kiem nh krusskal-wallis: (1 bien metric, 1 bien

non- metric) khong theo phan phoi chuan Co s khac biet ve mc o no lc co gang cua nhan vien theo cac cong ty thuoc ca ckhu vc khac nhau? (analyze-nonparametric tests K independence samples )

15

(analyze-descriptive statistics crrosstabs statistics chisquare)

Ranks Co gang khu vuc Nha Trang Da Nang Ha Noi Can Tho Dong Nai Total N 76 81 163 52 49 421 Mean Rank 206.6447 212.0556 194.3957 235.1154 245.6531

Test Statistics(a,b) Snoluc Chi-Square df Asymp. Sig. a b 9.561538 4 0.048498 Kruskal Wallis Test Grouping Variable: khu vuc

T choi gia thuyet Ho Co s khac biet ve mc o no lc co gang cua nhan vien thuoc cac khu vc khac nhau Cau 13: Moi quan he gia hai bien nh lng (metric): Long trung thanh va s hai long cua nhan vien Analyze correlate bivariate

16

Correlations shailong shailong strungthanh Pearson Correlation 1 0.634233 Sig. (2-tailed) 1.59E-47 N 417 410 Pearson Correlation 0.634233 1 Sig. (2-tailed) 1.59E-47 N 410 417 Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

strungthanh

**

Cau 14: Hoi quy anh hng cua cac yeu to thoa man vi cong viec en long trung thanh cua CBNV?

Hoi quy a bien Sloy = a 1 + a 2* sw + a 3* sp + a 4*scow + a 5* ssup + a 6 * strain

17

ieu kien: Khong a cong tuyen:

Phng sai cua phan d khong oi

18

Histogram

Dependent Variable: strungthanh

50

40

Frequency

30

20

10 Mean = -2.73E-15 Std. Dev. = 0.993 N = 374

0 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3

Regression Standardized Residual

Cac phan d co phan phoi chuan

19

Normal P-P Plot of Regression Standardized Residual

Dependent Variable: sloy

1.0

0.8

Expected Cum Prob

0.6

0.4

0.2

0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

Observed Cum Prob

Khong co hien tng tng t tng quan gia cac phan d

20