Sec Cma SWM

Solid Waste Management
Commissionerate of
Municipal Administration
Report of Assessment of Vehicle

suitable for Solid Waste Management
http://sikailash.wordpress.com Mail to:-kailasasundaram@gmail.com
Assessment of Vehicle for Solid Waste Management
Background
In order to comply with solid waste ( M & H ) rules 2000 as per Supreme Court orders the
Commissionerate of Municipal Administration has issued detailed guidelines to all Municipal Commissioners,
Regional Director of Municipal Administration and Corporation Commissioners. Taking from training Solid
Waste Management for priority for the current year, instruction have been issued to all field officers to prepare
action plan in accordance with Solid Waste Management Guide lines.
Several review meetings were conducted at Regional level at Commissionerate level and the
plans were required. Senior officer from Commissioner of Municipal Administration were Deputed to all regions
to ensure that the plans were prepared in tune with field realities.
The Commissioner of Municipal Administration personally reviewed plan of all 5 Corporations

and sample plans of some Municipalities with Regional Director of Municipal Administration. Finally a launching
program for Solid Waste Management was taken up by Commissioner of Municipal Administration during last
week of January and first week of February while Chengalpetu, Vellore, Selam, Tripour regions were launched
of Chennai, Tanjore, Madurai, Thirunelveli regions launched the implementation for Trichy, Madurai,
Thirunelveli by Commissioner of Municipal Administration.
In order to enlighten the Urban Local Bodies on Technical Specifications of vehicles and there
availability in market the Commissioner of Municipal Administration had formed a official committee
subsequent to the discussion of with Regional Director of Municipal Administration & Commissioners during
review meeting dated 19th and 20th of December 2004.
The committee consisted of the following members:
1. Additional Director of Municipal Administration

2. Superintendent Engineer
3. Joint Director
4. Medical Officers
5. Regional Director of Municipal Administration of Chengalpettu, Tanjor and
Tiruppur.
6. Commissioners of Corporation of Trichi, Coimbatur and Salem
The above committee was subsequently enlarged and includes all Regional Director of
Municipal Administration and all Corporation Commissioners, City Engineers and Regional
Executive Engineers to accommodate wider views.
Methodology to obtain information
In order to obtain information from the market, a committee of officers was formed to submit information
on vehicles. The sub committee consisted of
Personal Assistant to Superintendent Engineer office of the CMA
Assistant Engineer III office of the CMA and
Assistant Engineer Pallavapuram Municipality
From the presentation made on Solid Waste Management action plan by all Regional Director and
Corporation Commissioners during the month of December, January, February, it was ascertained the
requirement of vehicle in general will be
(a ) For primary Collection
Tri-Cycle & Push Cart and auto will be useful
( b ) Secondary Collection
For secondary collection tipping lorry of capacity 2 MT to 4MT and 4MT to 6MT, Dumper Placer vehicle
of capacity 5 MT to 6 MT and Compactor vehicle 9MT (16 cum) will be useful
( c ) Transfer Station
For use in Transfer Station Front end Loader with Backhoe, Chain Bulldozer Water lorries to put off
fire, chain dozers will be useful

Parameters for comparisons
After discussion at all levels & with Commissioner of Municipal Administration the following parameters
have been fixed for comparison in addition to technical specification.
1. Suitability of type of Vehicle

2. Specifications
3. Usage of SWM
4. Availability of DGS & D Price
5. Service Centers
6. Response time for services
7. Annual O&M Cost
8. Entry Tax
9. Rate to include registration tax for the first time
10. Training to Drivers
Comparative statement
Based on the information provided by the Committee after due assessment at the market, the
comparative statement along with required specification is perused by the committee.
The committee views that Comparative report and technical specification submitted by sub
committee may be agreed to.
For new type of vehicles like segri loader etc., which are available as non standard vehicles in
markets the urban local bodies may ascertained the specification and per it cleared through
Regional Director of Municipal Administration and opt for open tenders adhering to tender
transpracy act.
The rats are all indicative and should be ascertained through prescribed procedure
A colour code may be followed it may be deep blue alone are deep blue and white mix. This may
be discussed with RTOs also
In the modes of Coimbatore Corporation GPS may be fixed by Municipalities which can afford if
after assessing the need for the same and following of procedures.
Sl No Name Designations Signature
Additional Director
1
of Municipal Administration
Superintending Engineer
2
Joint Director
3
Medical Officer
4
Regional Director of Municipal

5
Administration
Chengalpattu Region
6
Administration
Chengalpattu Region
7
Administration Tanjor Region
8
Administration
Tiruppur Region
Commissioner of
9
Corporation of Trichi
Commissioner of
10
Corporation Coimbatur
Commissioner of
11
Corporation of Salem

Observation of committee on Tricycle and push-cart
Sl.N Tricycle Push-cart

o.
1 Suitability Suitable for door to door collection where Suitable for door to door collection
more number of male worker available where more number of Female worker
available
2 Specification Cycle Rickshaw with heavy duty 12 ply Fiber glass buckets of 45 litres
international Tyre with Tube, Hero make capacity each, body thickness over
heavy duty Rim for front wheel, bullet rim all 2.5 mm, bottom provided with +
Wheel with M.R.F. tyre and tube in the Type reinforcement with PVC Pipe
rear side. Garbage box mounted on the 20 mm dia and two eye lids of 20
rear wheel with box rectangular size of 4’ mm dia at the bottom. Bucket fitted
X 3’ X 2’ with door. Outer frame covered with mile steel handle of 6 mm rod.
with 18 G.C.R. sheet and inner side with Same is fitted to the buckets with
18G Aluminum Sheet (Heavy) and bottom rubber washer and bolt & nuts. At
side with ½” Country wooden planks the point of fixing the handle the
covered with 18G Aluminum sheet buckets shall have a thickness of not
(Heavy) with one coat of Epoxy primer less than 12 mm and buckets shall
and one coat of Enamel Paint for Steel have glossy double side finish
Portion. coated with best quality of paint
approved colour. At the side bottom
20 mm wide and 100 mm length fiber
will be provided for easy lifting of the
buckets. Bucket height 29” Top Dia
15” and Bottom 9”
Chassis manufactured from 25 X 25

mm X 18 gauge thick mild steel
Square pipe having 2 compartments
of 350 mm X 350 mm clear dimension
Front portion will be covered with Mild
Steel sheet of 18 Gauge thick properly
welded. The chassis is provided wit
handle made out of Mild Steel round
pipe of 30 mm dia X 16 Gauge thick.
A handle will be fitted with rubber cap
of length 300 mm long 2.5 mm thick.
All other details as per the drawing.
3 Usage of Solid Plays major role in collection of Garbage Plays major role in collection of
Waste in the lanes and slums Garbage in the lanes and slums
Management
4 DGS & D Priced Not available Not available
Vehicle
5 Service center Does not arise Does not arise
6 Response time Easy to rectify the repair by the user Easy to rectify the repair by the user
foe service themselves themselves
7 Annual O & M 10% of capital cost 10% of capital cost
cost
8 Entry tax Does not arise Does not arise
9 Registration Does not arise Does not arise
10 Training Does not arise Does not arise
Observation of Committee on
TIPPER AUTO (0.75 MT)
1 Suitability type of vehicle and Suitable to collect the Garbage in the streets having
market supplies less then 15’ width.
2 Specification An Auto with tipping arrangements having an open

body with MS bottom and Aluminum sides of pay
load capacity of Minimum 600 kg fitted with Diesel
engine of capacity between 400CC to 510CC with
out exceeding the 3500mm of turning radius
including cost of chassis and cabins.
3 Usage for SWM

For the streets having less than 15’ width tipping Auto
(three wheelers) is useful. These tipping Auto may
also be used for Door to Door collection.
4 DGS & D priced Vehicles
DGS & D rate is available.
5 Service Centre
Should be locally Serviced.
6 Response time for service
The Repairs & fault should be rectified with in 48
hours. The supplies should have AMC facilities for the
Vehicle supplied by them and cost for AMC should
also be considered.
7 Annual O&M cost
The comparative statements should be prepared on
cost / Tonne/ Km basis considering (a) Annualized
cost (c) man power cost, (d) Fuel (e) Maintenance (I
@ 10% of capital cost) (f) Supervision cost (@ 10% of
man power cost and the waste transported by the
vehicle (b)
O & M = a+c+d+e+f
Bx350
8 Entry tax The Entry tax should also taken into account for
comparing the net cost of vehicle.
9 Rate to includes registration tax for The expenditure to be incurred to wards the
the first time registration should also be included to arrive the net
cost of vehicle for comparison purpose.
10 Training to Drivers The supplier should give training to the Drivers
recommended by the municipality to enable to
operate the special type of vehicles, which requires
experience to operate them.
Observation of committee on
2.00MT to 4.00MT Capacity( Mini Lorry )
1 Suitability type of vehicle And Suitable to collect the Garbage’s in the streets having 15’ to
market supplies 20’ width.
2 Specification Tipper lorry loading height more then 1380m with a payload
varying between 2000kg to 4000kg / 4000 Kg to 6000 Kg with
stainless steel closed body with diesel engine capacity varying
between 324CC to 2956CC without exceeding the turning
radius beyond 6.9m including cost of chaises and cabin.
3 Usage for SWM
Most of the street collection of Garbage may be done
using this tipper lorry. Depending on the number of 15’ to
20’ width road and Quantity of garbage generated in that
streets this tipper lorry may be used.
5 Service Centre
Should be locally Serviced
The Repairs & fault should be rectified with in 48 hours.
The supplies should have AMC facilities for the Vehicle
supplied by them and tariff for AMC should also
considered.
7 Annual O&M cost
The comparative statements should be prepared on cost /
Tonne/ Km basis considering (a) Annualized cost (c) man
power cost, (d) Fuel (e) Maintenance (I @ 10% of capital
cost) (f) Supervision cost (@ 10% of man power cost and
the waste transported by the vehicle (b)
O&M = a+c+d+e+f
Bx350
8 Entry tax The Entry tax should also taken into account for comparing the
net cost of vehicle.
9 Rate to include first time The expenditure to be incurred to wards the registration should
registration tax also be included to arrive the net cost of vehicle for
comparison purpose.
10 Training to Drivers The supplier should give training to the Drivers recommended
by the municipality to enable to operate the special type of
vehicles which requires experience to operate them.

4 Mt to 6 MT Capacity Tipper Lorry

1 Suitability type of vehicle And
market supplies Suitable for mounting the compactor.
2 Specification and type Designs of Heavy duty goods chassis to here 16 tons gross
equipment vehicle weight and 4470mm wheel basis fitted
with diesel engine of suitable rating with standard
accessories excluding the cabin but including
driver seat, seat belt and extra power take off unit
as required for hydraulic system of compactor.
3 Usage for SWM

As the Chassis is to be used to mount the
compactor arrangement with hydraulic system this
should be with more toughness.

DGS & D rate is available only for standard pay
load capacity Vehicles with out extra power take off
unit. Hence special Prices Quoted by the supplies /
Manufacturer may be taken for consideration on
comparative basis.
5 Service Center
Should be easily Serviceable at local Service
center .
Warranty period , free Service duration and AMC
conditions charges Should be quoted by the
supplies.
7 Annual Maintenance Contract /
O&M cost With the cost Price of Compactor Unit the cost of
the chassis should also be included in calculating
the O&M of Compactor.
8 Entry tax Should be included in arriving cost Prices of entire
Compactor unit.
9 Rate to include first time Should be included in arriving the cost Price of
registration chassis and cost Price of entire Compactor Unit.
10 Training to Drivers The Supplies should give training to the Drivers.
Note: ( I ) Tender may be called for having Compactor equipment including the purchase of High Capacity
Chassis.

COMPACTOR
1 Suitability type of vehicle And Suitable for collecting garbage’s at the collection points
market supplies such as street corners, markets, bus stand by placing
compactor bins of 1100 Litres
2 Specification and type Designs Compactor having hopper capacity of 2m3 and total
3
of equipment capacity of 12m (9 ton pay load) with fully enclosed mild
steel body, confirming with IS 1079/1062 in quality of
plate thickness varying from 5mm to 10mm used for the
body and having hydraulically operated rear end loader
with bin litter mechanism, hydraulic cylinders direction
control valves confirming the ISO 9002
3 Usage for SWM
The usage of compactor should reduce the number of
trips and vehicle with the considerable compaction
ratio in collection
This is a special purpose equipment very recently
being marketed for which DGS & D rate not available.
5 Service Centre
Should be enable to complete the fault and repairs
immediately in the local service centers
The supplier should provide AMC details for the
vehicle supplied by them the repairing work should
able to complete with in 48 hours.
7 Annual O&M cost
The comparative statements should be prepared on
cost / Tonne/ Km basis considering (a)
Annualized cost (c) man power cost, (d) Fuel (e)
Maintenance (I @ 10% of capital cost) (f) Supervision
cost (@ 10% of man power cost and the waste
transported by the vehicle (b)
O&M = a+c+d+e+f
Bx350
8 Entry tax The Entry tax should also taken into account for
comparing the net cost of vehicle
9 Rate to include first time The expenditure to be incurred to wards the registration
registration tax should also be included to arrive the net cost of vehicle for
comparison purpose
10 Training to Drivers The supplier should give training to the Drivers
recommended by the municipality to enable to operate the
special type of vehicles which requires experience to
operate them.

Observation of Committee
DUMPER PLACER
1 Suitability type of vehicle And Suitable for collecting garbage’s at the collection points such
market supplies as street corners, markets, bus stand slums, colonies by
placing Dumper placer Bins
2 Specification and type Designs

Dumper placer having twin container placer body with two
stabilizer, mounted over the chassis of capacity 6 tonne with 61
KN divert injection diesel engine full filling the 2000 emission
norms with required load spring leaves for front & rear, load
spring assembly, V Clamps centre bolt, spring clamps etc.,
confirming with standard accessories.
3 Usage for SWM

It should be useful to handle the garbage at market, slums,
Hotels, office complex and reduces the requirement of vehicles
for primary collection and in secondary collection.
DGS & D Price is available.
5 Service Centre
Should be enable to complete the fault and repairs immediately
in the local service centers
The supplies should provide AMC details for the vehicle
supplied by them the repairing work should able to complete
with in 48 hours.
7 Annual O&M cost
power cost, (d) Fuel (e) Maintenance (I @ 10% of capital cost)
(f) Supervision cost (@ 10% of man power cost and the waste
transported by the vehicle (b)
O & M = a+c+d+e+f
Bx350
8 Entry tax The Entry tax should also taken into account for comparing
the net cost of vehicle.
9 Rate to include first time The expenditure to be incurred to wards the registration
registration tax should also be included to arrive the net cost of vehicle for
comparison purpose.
10 Training to Drivers The supplier should give training to the Drivers recommended
by the municipality to enable to operate the special type of
vehicles which requires experience to operate them.

Front end loader & backhoe excavator

1 Suitability type of vehicle and Suitable for earth work
market supplies Suitable for turning the garbage at the compost yard
2 Specification and type Designs of A front end loader with capacity of

equipment 1.00 cu.m. with dumping angle minimum 45 degree and
excavator capacity 0.24 cu.m. with a swing of minimum 180
degree mounted over a diesel engine developing 72 HP @
2200 rpm with hydraulic system having minimum pressure
of 2000 and maximum of 3000 PSI with Turing radius of
4000-5750mm
3 Usage for SWM
Used for loading purpose at Transfer station
Used for turning the garbage at compost yard

5 Service Center
Should be easily Serviceable at local Service center.

Warranty period , free Service duration and AMC conditions
charges Should be quoted by the suppliers.
7 Annual Maintenance Contract /

O&M cost
power cost, (d) Fuel (e) Maintenance (I @ 10% of capital
cost) (f) Supervision cost (@ 10% of man power cost and the
waste transported by the vehicle (b)
O&M = a+c+d+e+f
Bx350
8 Entry tax Should be included in arriving cost Prices of Front End

Loader.
9 Rate to include first time registration Should be included in arriving the cost Price of Front End

Loader.
10 Training to Drivers The Suppliers should give training to the Drivers for atleast
7 days.

MODEL
COMPARISON ON FUEL CONSUMPTION
OF THREE WHEELER VEHICLES FOR PRIMARY COLLECTION
Sl
No Description Details of Vehicles compared
Ape Scooter India Mahindra & Mahendra Bajaj Tempo
1. Body capacity (pay Load) 560Kg 600Kg 665Kg 600Kg
2. Body Material MS Bottom Aluminum MS Bottom MS Sides MS Bottom MS Sides MS Bottom MS Sides
Sides
3. Closed Body Vehicle or Covering Open Body Open Body Open Body Open Body
the Collected
4. Driven petrol or diesel Diesel Diesel Diesel Diesel
5. Hydraulic Tipping or Manual Hydraulic Manual Manual Hydraulic
6. In Case of Hydraulic Tipping Same Separate Same Same
same prime or suppurate prime
7. Transportation Distance 25 Km 25Km 25 Km 25 Km
8. Availability of Transfer station 25 Km 25Km 25 Km 25 Km
9. Availability of spares Available Available Available Available
10. Loading Height of the Body 1335 mm Loading 1450mm 1250mm 1300mm
Height
1000mm Unloading 1200mm 1050mm 950mm
Height
11. Turning Radius 2750mm 3500mm 3260mm 3500mm
12. Unladen Weight
13. Engine ( CC ) 400cc 510cc 510cc 499cc
14. Fuel consumption / Lit 36 Km / Lit 25Km / Lit 18-20Km / Lit 23Km / Lit
15. Lubricating Oil Once in 3000Km Once in 3000Km /2.2Lit Once in 3000 Km / 2.2Lit Once in 3000Km / 2Lit
/1.75Lit
16. Expenditure / ton / Km Rs.1.34 / Ton / Km Rs.1.79 /Ton / Km Rs.1.99 /Ton / Km Rs.1.92 /Ton / KM

MODEL
Evaluation on O & M of Three Wheelers
Description Ape Scooter India Mahindra & Bajaj Tempo

Mahendra
Pay Load 560 Pay Load Pay Load 665 Pay Load 600Kg
Kg 600Kg Kg
A Annualized Cost
Capital Cost 1,95,530 2,20,000 1,65,114 1,82,400
Insurance 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000
Depreciation16.27 % 31,812 35,794 26,845 29,676
Annualised cost 2,32,342 2,60,794 1,96,845 2,17,076
B Waste Transported
No of Trips 8 /per day
Per year (2800) per trips
1,568 MT 1,680MT 1,862MT 1,680MT
C Man Power Cost
Driver 1 @ 4000/ month
Helper 1 @ 2500 / month 48,000 48,000 48,000 48,000
Incentive 20%
30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000
15,600 15,600 15,600 15,600
93,600 93,600 93,600 93,600
D Fuel Consumption 36 Km / lit 25 Km / Lit 20 Km / Lit 23 Km / Lit
Transport distance / day 25 Km 25 Km 25 Km 25 Km
Transport distance / Year 8750 Km 8750 Km 8750 Km 8750 Km
Transport cost per year @ 6076 8750 10938 9510
Rs.25 / Lit
E Maintenance Cost @ 10% 19,553 22,000 16,500 18,240
Capital cost
F Supervision Cost @ 10% Man
power cost 9,360 9,360 9,360 9,360
G Cost /Tone /Km
(a+c+d+e+f)
----------------
b x 350 Rs.0.65 Ton / Rs.0.67 Rs.0.50 Rs.0.59
Km Ton / Km Ton / Km Ton / Km

MODEL
COMPARISON ON FUEL CONSUMPTION OF FOUR WHEELER VEHICLES FOR PRIMARY COLLECTION
Sl Details of Vehicles Compared

No Description A B C D E F
1. Body capacity 2000Kg 3000Kg 2575Kg 3570Kg 3330Kg 3700 Kg
(pay Load)
2. Body Material s.s m.s m.s m.s m.s MS
3. Closed Body Vehicle or Open body Open body Open body Open body Open body Open body
Covering the Collected
4. Driven petrol or diesel Diesel Diesel Diesel Diesel Diesel Diesel
5. Hydraulic Tipping or annual Hydraulic Tipping Hydraulic Hydraulic Hydraulic Hydraulic Tipping Hydraulic Tipping
Tipping Tipping Tipping
6. Transportation Distance 40Km 40Km 40Km 40Km 40Km 40 Km
7. Availability of Transfer 2.5Km 2.5Km 2.5Km 2.5Km 2.5Km 2.5 Km
station
8 Availability of spares Available Available Available Available Available Available
9 Loading Height of the Body 2000mm 1620mm 1380mm 1650mm 1831mm 1930 mm
10 Turning Radius 4.9m 6.50 m - 6.00m 6.00m 6.50m
11 Speed Low speed High speed High speed High speed High speed High speed
12 Unlading Weight 1370KG 3245Kg 2220 kg 1890Kg 2250Kg 2250 Kg
13 Engine ( CC ) 625CC 324.5CC 2523cc 345.5CC 2956cc 4 Cylinder direct
14 Fuel consumption / Lit 14 Km/Lit 8 Km/Lit 8 Km/lit 8 Km/ Lit 6Km /Lit 9 km / Lit
15 Lubricating Oil 15000 / 7Lit 15000/7Lit 15000 KM/ 15000/16.5 Lit 15000/10 Lit 15000 / 12 Lit
16.0Lit
Expenditure / ton / Km Ra.0.91 Rs 1.05 Rs.1.26 Rs.0.90 Rs.1.09 Rs. 0.77

MODEL EVALUATION OF O & M COST FOR 4 WHEEL VEHICLES WITH A PAY LOAD VARYING FROM 2.0 TON TO 4.0 TON
HUNTER BAJAJ TEMPO M&M SML 407 EICHER 10.59
DESCRIPTION RATE/ UNIT RATE/ UNIT RATE/ UNIT RATE/ UNIT RATE/ UNIT RATE/ UNIT
MODEL
Wheel Base mm mm mm mm mm mm
Payload Tons 2000 Tons 3000 Tons 2575 Tons 3570 Tons 3350 Tons 3700
A Annualised Cost
Capital Cost 315000 388000 401263 595751 480000 606000
Insurance 12000 12000 12000 12000 12000 12000
Depreciation 16.27 51251 16.27 63128 16.27% 65285 16.27% 96929 16.27% 78096 16.27% 98596
% %
TOTAL 366251 463128 478548 704680 570096 716596
B Waste transported per 2800 5600 2800 8400 2800 7210 2800 9996 2800 9380 2800 10360
year (8 trips per day X 350
working days = 2800 TRIPS
PER YEAR
C Manpower Cost - Salaries of 140000 140000 140000 140000 140000 140000
driver and helper including
incentive
D Fuel Consumption KM/Lt 14 KM/Lt 8 KM/Ltr 8 KM/Ltr 8 KM/Ltr 6 KM/Ltr 9
r r
Transport Distance per KM 40 KM 40 KM 40 KM 40 KM 40 KM 40

day(km)
Transport Distance Per year KM 14000 KM 14000 KM 14000 KM 14000 KM 14000 KM 14000
(km)
Transport Cost Per year 25 25000 25 43750 25 43750 25 43750 25 58333 25 38889
(Diesel cost @ 25/LTR)
E Maintenance Cost 10% 36625 10% 46313 10% 47855 10% 70468 10% 57010 10% 71660
F Supervision Cost (as 10% 14000 10% 14000 10% 14000 10% 14000 10% 14000 10% 14000
percentage of Manpower
cost)
G COST / TON / KM 0.30 0.24 0.29 0.28 0.26 0.27
MODEL
OF SIX WHEELER VEHICLES FOR SECONDARY COLLECTION
COMPARISON OF 6 WHEELER VEHICLE

SL DESCRIPTION UNIT EICHER 10.90 TATA 709 AL 709 AL 909
NO
1 BODY CAPACITY – PAY LOAD KG 6000 3900 3950 6000
2 BODY MATERIAL MS MS MS MS
3 TYPE OF BODY OPEN BODY OPEN BODY OPEN BODY OPEN BODY
4 DRIVEN – PETROL/DIESEL DIESEL DIESEL DIESEL DIESEL
5 HYDRAULIC HYDRAULIC HYDRAULIC HYDRAULIC HYDRAULIC
TIPPING/MANNUAL TIPPING TIPPING TIPPING TIPPING

6 TRANSPORTATION DISTANCE KM 40 40 40 40
7 AVAILABILITY OF TRANSFER KM 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5
STATION
8 AVAILABILITY OF SPARE AVAILABLE AVAILABLE AVAILABLE AVAILABLE
PARTS
9 LOADING HEIGHT OG BODY MTRS
10 TURNING RADIUS MTRS 5.4 6.0 7.0 7.0
11 SPEED KMPH 85
12 UNLADEN WEIGHT KG 2905 2920 3400 4000
13 ENGINE DISPLACEMENT CC 3298 3908 3908
14 FUEL CONSUMPTION KM/LTR 9 8 8 7
15 LUBRICATION OIL 15000/12 15000/14 12000/8.5 12000/8.5
CONSUMPTION PER YEAR
OIL REQUIRED / CHANGE 12 14 8.5 8.5
FREQUENCY 15000 15000 12000 12000
COST OF OIL/KM 0.08
FUEL COST/KM 2.78 3.13 3.13 3.57
16 TOTAL COST/TON/KM 0.46 0.80 0.79 0.60

EVALUATION ON O & M COST FOR SIX WHEEL VEHICLES WITH A PAYLOAD VARYING FROM 3.90 TO 6.00 TON
FOR THE USAGE OF GARBAGE TIPPER, DUMPER PLACER IN SECONDARY COLLECTION
GARBAGE TIPPER DUMPER PLACER
MAKE EICHER 10.90 TATA 709 AL 709 AL 909 EICHER 10.90 TATA AL 909
TIPPER TIPPER
DESCRIPTION RATE/UNIT RATE/UNIT RATE/ UNIT RATE/ UNIT RATE/UNIT RATE/UNIT RATE/ UNIT
Wheel Base mm 3350 mm 3350 mm 3600 mm 3600 mm 3350 mm 3600 mm

Payload Kg 6000 Kg 3900 Kg 3950 Kg 6000 Kg 6000 Kg 6000 Kg
A Annualised Cost
Capital Cost 758120 586292 575988 730315 978253
Insurance 18000 18000 18000 18000 18000 18000 18000
Depreciation 16.27% 123346 16.27% 95390 16.27% 93713 16.27% 118822 16.27% 159162 16.27% 0 16.27% 0
TOTAL 899466 699682 687701 867137 1155415 18000 18000
B Waste transported per year (8 trips per 2800 16800 2800 10920 2800 11060 2800 16800 2800 16800 2800 16800 2800 0
day X 350 working days)
C Manpower Cost - Salaries of driver and helper 140000 140000 140000 140000 140000 140000 140000
including incentive
D Fuel Consumption KM/Ltr 9 KM/Ltr 8 KM/Ltr 8 KM/Ltr 7 KM/Ltr 8 KM/Ltr KM/Ltr
Transport Distance per day KM 40 KM 40 KM 40 KM 40 KM 40 KM 40 KM 40
Transport Distance Per year KM 14000 KM 14000 KM 14000 KM 14000 KM 14000 KM 14000 KM 14000
Transport Cost Per year (@ 25.00 PER 25 38889 25 43750 25 43750 25 50000 25 43750 25 #DIV/0! 25 #DIV/0!
Liter)
E Maintenance Cost (% of CAP.cost) 10% 89947 10% 69968 10% 68770 10% 86714 10% 115541 10% 1800 10% 1800
F Supervision Cost (as percentage of 10% 14000 10% 14000 10% 14000 10% 14000 10% 14000 10% 14000 10% 14000
Manpower cost)
G COST / TON / KM 0.20 0.25 0.25 0.20 0.25 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

MODEL
OF COMPACTOR VEHICLES WITH CHASSIS ( EXCLUDING BINS )
Sl No Details of Vehicles Compared

Description A B C D
1. Body capacity (pay Load) 10000 Kg. 8000 Kg. 9000 Kg. 10300 Kg.
2. Body Material Mild steel Mild Steel Mild Steel Mild steel
3. Closed Body Vehicle or Covering Closed Closed Closed Closed
the Collected
4. Driven petrol or diesel Diesel Diesel Diesel Diesel
5. Hydraulic Tipping Mechanical Mechanical Mechanical Mechanical
6. Compacting ratio 2:1 Not available 2:1 2:1
7. Transportation Distance / day 50 Km. 50 Km. 50 Km. 50 Km.
8. Availability of spares Available Available Available Available
9. Turning Radius 6.50 m 6.50 m 6.50 m 6.50 m
10. Speed 40 km / hr 40 km / hr 40 km / hr 40 km / hr
11. Fuel consumption / Lit 5 km / lit 5 km / lit 5 km / lit 5 km / lit
12. Engine ( CC ) REL – 12 REL – 12 -- EICHER 10.90
13. Lubricating Oil 2000 km / 2500 km / 2000 km / 2000 km /
13 lit 25 lit 13 lit 13 lit
14. Expenditure / ton / Km Rs.0.57 Rs. 0.75 Rs. 0.62 Rs.0.55

MODEL EVALUATION ON O & M OF COMPACTOR VEHICLE
MAKE KAM-AVIDA FAN-NSR EICHER 20.16 MARATHON EQUIPMENT
DESCRIPTION RATE/UNIT RATE/UNIT RATE/ UNIT RATE/UNIT
Wheel Base mm 3350 mm 3350 mm 3600 mm 3350

Payload Kg 10000 Kg 8000 Kg 10300 Kg 9000
A Annualised Cost
Capital Cost 2395000 3135000 2417564 2675000
Insurance 175000 175000 175000 175000
Depreciation 16.27% 389666 16.27% 510064 16.27% 393338 16.27% 435222
TOTAL 2959666 3820064 2985902 3285222
B Waste transported per year (3 trips per 1095 10950 1095 8760 1095 11279 1095 9855
day X 365 working days)
C Manpower Cost - Salaries of driver and helper 160000 160000 160000 160000
including incentive
D Fuel Consumption KM/Ltr 5 KM/Ltr 5 KM/Ltr 5 KM/Ltr 5
Transport Distance per day KM 50 KM 50 KM 50 KM 50

Transport Distance Per year KM 18250 KM 18250 KM 18250 KM 18250
Transport Cost Per year (@ 25.00 PER 25 91250 25 91250 25 91250 25 91250
Liter)
E Maintenance Cost (% of CAP.cost) 10% 295966 10% 382006 10% 298590 10% 328522
F Supervision Cost (as percentage of 10% 16000 10% 16000 10% 16000 10% 16000
Manpower cost)
G COST / TON / KM 0.92 1.45 0.90 1.12
CONTAINER COST EXTRA @ 25000 PER UNIT

MODEL
COMPARISON ON FUEL CONSUMPTION OF
FRONT END LOADER AND BACKHOE EXCAVATOR
Sl Details of Vehicles Compared

No Description A B C
1. Bucket 1 cu.m. 1 cu.m. 1 cu.m.
2. Vehicles capacity pay load 1.85 tons 1.85 tons 1.85 tons
3. Hydraulic system (primary 91 lpm -- 98 lpm
pump)
4. Pressure 3000 PSI -- 2350 PSI
5. Loader Pump angle 45 degree 50 degree 45 degree
6. Loader design depth 80 mm 82 mm 132 mm
7. Loader height 1.13 m 1.86 m 1.88 m
8. Turing Radius 4000 – 5750 4000 – 5750 4000 – 5750
9. Speed 15 km / hr 16 km / hr 14 km / hr
10. Engine (CC) Krilosker 72 HP @ Perkin 82 HP @ Krilosker
2200 rpm 220 rpm
11. Backhoe
Side shift 5.40 m 5.62 m 5.89 m
Axial 4.70 m 5.19 m 5.39 m
Swing 185 degree 194 degree 180 degree
12. Fuel consumption / hr /lit 7 hr / lit 6 hr / lit 6.1/2 hr / lit
Expenditure hr / lit Rs. 7.14 /hrs Rs.8.36 / hrs Rs. 7.70/ hrs

MODEL
EVALUATION ON O & M OF FRONT END LOADER & BACKHOE EXCAVATOR
Description A B C
Escorts Hindustan L&T
A Annualized Cost
Capital Cost 14,00,000 13,00,000 14,00,000
Insurance 60,000 60,000 60,000
Depreciation 16.27 % 22,778 21,151 232,778
Rs.
B Working hours per year 3650 hrs. 3650 hrs. 3650 hrs.
C Man Power Cost 1,44,000 1,44,000 1,44,000
Salary of driver and helper including
Incentive 20 %
D Fuel Consumption 7 hrs /Lit 6 hrs / Lit 6.30 hrs / Lit

@ 6 hrs /lit including oil
20,860 24,500 22,600
( cost of diesel @ Rs.40 / lit + Oil )
E Maintenance Cost @ 10% Capital cost 1,40,000 1,30,000 1,40,000
F Supervision Cost @ 10% Man power cost 14,400 14,400 14,400
G Assuming Age of vehicles 5 years 5 years 5 years
H Cost /Tone /Km Rs. 94.20 / hrs Rs.88.38 / hrs. Rs. 94.30 / hrs.
(a+c+d+e+f)
----------------
bxg

Sec Cma SWM

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Исходное описание:

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Sec Cma SWM

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Solid Waste Management

Report of Assessment of Vehicle

The Commissioner of Municipal Administration personally reviewed plan of all 5 Corporations

The committee consisted of the following members:

1. Additional Director of Municipal Administration

Methodology to obtain information

Personal Assistant to Superintendent Engineer office of the CMA

Assistant Engineer III office of the CMA and

Assistant Engineer Pallavapuram Municipality

(a ) For primary Collection

Tri-Cycle & Push Cart and auto will be useful

http://sikailash.wordpress.com Mail to:-kailasasundaram@gmail.com

1. Suitability of type of Vehicle

Sl No Name Designations Signature

Regional Director of Municipal

http://sikailash.wordpress.com Mail to:-kailasasundaram@gmail.com

Sl.N Tricycle Push-cart

Chassis manufactured from 25 X 25

TIPPER AUTO (0.75 MT)

2 Specification An Auto with tipping arrangements having an open

3 Usage for SWM

2.00MT to 4.00MT Capacity( Mini Lorry )

http://sikailash.wordpress.com Mail to:-kailasasundaram@gmail.com

4 Mt to 6 MT Capacity Tipper Lorry

3 Usage for SWM

4 DGS & D priced Vehicles

http://sikailash.wordpress.com Mail to:-kailasasundaram@gmail.com

http://sikailash.wordpress.com Mail to:-kailasasundaram@gmail.com

2 Specification and type Designs

3 Usage for SWM

http://sikailash.wordpress.com Mail to:-kailasasundaram@gmail.com

Front end loader & backhoe excavator

2 Specification and type Designs of A front end loader with capacity of

Used for turning the garbage at compost yard

4 DGS & D priced Vehicles

6 Response time for service

7 Annual Maintenance Contract /

8 Entry tax Should be included in arriving cost Prices of Front End

http://sikailash.wordpress.com Mail to:-kailasasundaram@gmail.com

http://sikailash.wordpress.com Mail to:-kailasasundaram@gmail.com

http://sikailash.wordpress.com Mail to:-kailasasundaram@gmail.com

Description Ape Scooter India Mahindra & Bajaj Tempo

http://sikailash.wordpress.com Mail to:-kailasasundaram@gmail.com

Sl Details of Vehicles Compared

http://sikailash.wordpress.com Mail to:-kailasasundaram@gmail.com

http://sikailash.wordpress.com Mail to:-kailasasundaram@gmail.com

COMPARISON OF 6 WHEELER VEHICLE

http://sikailash.wordpress.com Mail to:-kailasasundaram@gmail.com

http://sikailash.wordpress.com Mail to:-kailasasundaram@gmail.com

GARBAGE TIPPER DUMPER PLACER

Wheel Base mm 3350 mm 3350 mm 3600 mm 3600 mm 3350 mm 3600 mm

http://sikailash.wordpress.com Mail to:-kailasasundaram@gmail.com

Sl No Details of Vehicles Compared

http://sikailash.wordpress.com Mail to:-kailasasundaram@gmail.com

DESCRIPTION RATE/UNIT RATE/UNIT RATE/ UNIT RATE/UNIT

Wheel Base mm 3350 mm 3350 mm 3600 mm 3350

http://sikailash.wordpress.com Mail to:-kailasasundaram@gmail.com

http://sikailash.wordpress.com Mail to:-kailasasundaram@gmail.com

Sl Details of Vehicles Compared

http://sikailash.wordpress.com Mail to:-kailasasundaram@gmail.com

D Fuel Consumption 7 hrs /Lit 6 hrs / Lit 6.30 hrs / Lit

http://sikailash.wordpress.com Mail to:-kailasasundaram@gmail.com