Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Lsrj L rj
y sb = y0 ys includes the effect of normal hydraulic jump and the influence of the sill
(Hager, 1992).
Hydraulics
y2 y1 a)
h
Adequate Tail waterproper formation of the jump and effective dissipation of energy. Lrj Lj
y1 b)
h
Inadequate Tail waterhence Submergence is wanting. Ljb Lsrj
y2
y2 y1
y2 y1 xs
h
bs
d)
For any sill height h1 , minimum approach Froude number F1min is necessary for the formation of the hydraulic jump, and the corresponding maximum relative sill height Smax
1 2 .5 F1 . 200
Hydraulics
Depending mainly on the relative sill position X s three types of jump may form: I. A-jump II. B-jump III. Minimum B-jump
X s > 0.8 ( to 1)
The length of the jump L jb from the toe to the end of the bottom roller relative to the length of the classical jump L j is
L jb Lj
= 1 0.6S 1 / 3 (1- ) .
The length of the sill basin jump L jb is marginally less than the length of a classical jump
L j for all three types of flows mentioned above. A sill basin improves the stabilization of
a hydraulic jump under variable tailwater and is somewhat shorter than a classical hydraulic jump.
hopt y1
(L
jb
/ h)
opt
Sopt = 1 +
Figure 32.6 shows the basin with the standard USBR blocks, where spacing of the blocks sp is equal to the block width s p = w b and
sp
h
= 0.75 .
Hydraulics
y2
y1
h Xs a) Longitudinal section WB
WB
sp
b) Standard baffles
= PB / g wb y 2 / 2 2
for optimum basin performance, the coefficient is
opt = +
2 and the sequent depth ratio is Yb = 1+
1/ 2
1 F1 7 100 F1 0.5
The tail water reduction is above 10% when compared to the classical jump. Type II, Type III and Type IV basins are shown below.
Hydraulics
Slope 2:1
Lb = 4.3 y2 (a) Type II basin F1 > 4.5 v1 > 18.0 m/s Tail Water (TW) = 0.97 y2
0.8 y2
h3 = y1(4+F1)/9
(b) Type III basin F1 > 4.5 v1 < 18.0 m/s Tail Water (TW) = 0.83 y2