Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Bioresource Technology
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biortech
Corrigendum
Corrigendum to Equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic studies of Acid Orange 52 dye biosorption by Paulownia tomentosa Steud. leaf powder as a low-cost natural biosorbent [Bioresour. Technol. 101 (2010) 51375143]
Fatih Deniz *, Saadet D. Saygideger
Department of Biology, Faculty of Arts and Science, Gaziantep University, 27310 Gaziantep, Turkey
The authors regret that there were some errors in our above paper because of inadvertent mistakes in calculations of equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic data. The corrected gures (Figs. 36) and tables (Tables 14) presenting the recalculated data are given in this corrigendum. The authors apologize for any inconvenience that this may have caused.
1. Equilibrium modeling The experimental equilibrium data could be well interpreted by the Langmuir isotherm with maximum sorption capacity of 35.33 mg g1. This value is signicantly higher than that reported before. The corrected data for equilibrium modeling are shown in Table 1 and Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. Linear plots of (a) Langmuir, (b) Freundlich, (c) Temkin isotherms and (d) comparison of experimental and predicted data from the models.
DOI of original article: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.02.004 * Corresponding author. Tel.: +90 342 3171948; fax: +90 342 3171032. E-mail address: fdeniz@gantep.edu.tr (F. Deniz). 0960-8524/$ - see front matter 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.04.057
7689
Fig. 4. Plots of (a) pseudo-rst order, (b) pseudo-second order, (c) Elovich and (d) intraparticle diffusion kinetic models.
Langmuir b (L mg1) 0.04 Freundlich Kf (mg g1)(mg L1)1/n 4.26 Temkin AT (L mg1) 0.31
q (mg g )
-1
Table 2 Kinetic parameters for AO 52 biosorption (Co: 100 mg L1). Pseudo-rst order k1 (min1) 22.92 Pseudo-second order k2 (g mg1 min1) 0.0012 Elovich qe (mg g1) 26.38 qe (mg g1) 28.17 b (g mg1) 0.19 C (mg g1) 9.07 R2 0.9597 R2 0.9931 R2 0.9799 R2 0.9829 RMSE 0.78 RMSE 0.42 RMSE 0.76 RMSE 0.45
30
60
90
120
150
180
t (min)
Fig. 5. Comparison of experimental and predicted data from the kinetic models.
1/T (K -1)
0.4
a (mg g1 min1)
3.11 Intraparticle diffusion kp (mg g1 min1/2) 1.17
0.3
ln Kc
0.2
0.1
Table 3 Thermodynamic data for the biosorption of AO 52. T (K) ln Kc 0.34 0.28 0.19
DG (kJ mol1)
0.85 0.71 0.51
DH (kJ mol1)
6.02
7690 Table 4 The activation energy parameters for AO 52 biosorption. T (K) 298 308 318 k2 (g mg1 min1) 0.0012 0.0014 0.0017 A 0.3
3. Thermodynamic modeling
Ea (kJ mol1) 13.70
Eqs. (11) and (12) which appeared in thermodynamic modeling section are incorrect. The correct equations are as follow:
DG RT ln K c DH DS ln K c RT R
11 12
2. Kinetic modeling The kinetic data were well represented by the pseudo-second order kinetic model. The kinetic results are not changed signicantly. The revised data for kinetic modeling are depicted in Table 2 and Figs. 4 and 5.
where Kc states the equilibrium constant (qe/Ce). The corrected thermodynamic data are given in Tables 3 and 4 and Fig. 6. Thermodynamic studies indicated that the biosorption process was spontaneous. The value of DG is changed signicantly.