3/30/12

B. : How Do You Measure Ethics?

B.

THE MAGAZINE O F THE O PUS C O LLEGE O F BUSINESS FALL 2008 : VO LUME 6 : ISSUE 1

A BO U T : C O N T A C T : A RC H I V E

FEA TURED A RTICLES

Q&A with Bill Browning: Follow Nature's Lead Trend Spotting: Health Care Reform in 2 009 - Don't Look to Washington Rise Up The Next Econom y The Value of an M.B.A. How Do You Measure Ethics? A Fondness for Words and Num bers It's in His Blood The Bottom Line: I Hav e an M.B.A.

How Do You Measure Ethics?

Self-Assessment and Improvement Process brings a quantitative approach to an (allegedly) qualitative subject
T. Dean Maines

NEWS & EVENTS

The past two decades have seen an increased interest in defining ethical business

Entrepreneur giv es St. Thom as $1 0 m illion to support business ethics Ron Fowler 6 6 , Greg Hennes 85 am ong winners at Entrepreneur Awards Cerem ony Center for Fam ily Enterprise hosts conference on fam ily business issues In Mem oriam : Professor Em eritus Dr. Rawlie Sulliv an New director of John M. Morrison Center for Entrepreneurship, new faculty Two MBA students receiv e scholarships Honors for Opus College of Business Program s, Faculty and Students

practices. But how, exactly, does one define an ethical business practice and, more to the point, how does one measure ethical behavior? Rightly or wrongly,some would argue that a quantitative approach to measuring ethical behavior in a corporate entity is somehow alien to ethics and moral deliberation. Yet the SAIP Institute has developed a process the Self-Assessment and Improvement Process that seeks not only to support continuous improvement in areas of corporate social responsibility and business ethics, but also to quantitatively assess this most qualitative subject. Measurement and moral reasoning Jeremy Bentham, arguable the father of utilitarianism,held that one had to measure the amount of pleasure and pain that would result from an act in order to determine whether the deed was morally right or wrong. He identified seven variables in this quantitative assessment, including the intensity and the duration of the pleasure and pain produced by the action, and the number of people who experienced each sensation. According to Bentham, an act was morally praiseworthy if the net outcome of this measurement fell on the side of pleasure; otherwise, it was morally wrong. Many ethicists have raised objections to Benthams theory. But Bentham reminds us that moral reasoning usually entails some kind of assessment. Before we perform an action, we try to predict the acts likely outcomes and assess how well it conforms to certain enduring moral standards (telling the truth, keeping promises, honoring human dignity, and so forth). We also attempt to measure our moral character we scrutinize our inclinations and motives, all of which shape how we think about our moral responsibilities. And when we are at our best, our reasoning places extra weight on others claims and concerns. This prevents us from being unduly influenced by our own

www.stthomas.edu/bmag/2008/Fall/MeasureEthics.html

1/3

3/30/12

B. : How Do You Measure Ethics?

interests and increases the likelihood of ethical behavior. The measurements we typically make in our personal moral deliberations are more akin to those of a competitive diving judge than a timekeeper at a track meet. However, the above reflections suggest that assessment and measurement may be more closely connected to ethics than skeptics would allow. Institutionalizing moral values through measurement That said, it is possible to develop refined quantitative tools that can help business leaders address ethical challenges within their organization. And one of the biggest challenges facing them today is the development of a culture that promotes ethical conduct. This new emphasis on culture is due in part to the 2004 federal sentencing guidelines for organizations that call upon companies to develop cultures that encourage employees to behave ethically, as well as comply with the law. It also is partly attributable to the influence of total quality management, which taught companies that it is more costeffective to avoid product and service defects than to correct them after the fact. Extended to corporate ethics, this lesson underscores the need for firms to prevent ethical lapses. A culture that reinforces ethical conduct safeguards against morally problematic decisions and deeds. Ken Goodpaster, holder of the Opus C ollege of Business Koch Endowed C hair in Business Ethics, has identified three tasks leaders must undertake to create such a culture. First, leaders must orient their companies toward important moral values, such as respect for others, trustworthiness, transparency and fairness. Second, they must embed those values within the organizations processes and practices. Finally, leaders must make those values an enduring part of the firms identity. These tasks comprise the moral agenda of leadership. The SAIP assists with the second task, that of institutionalizing moral aspirations within processes and practices. Patterned after the process pioneered by the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Program, the SAIP enables business leaders to develop a thorough, data-based understanding of the processes that shape their companys performance on ethical issues. The SAIP assesses these processes using multiple criteria, including evidence of effectiveness, consistent application and continuous, systematic improvement. A set of performance benchmarks enables the organization to assign a numeric value to these processes. Higher scores on this scale reflect a greater degree of maturity. And the more mature a process is, the more likely it is to repeatedly produce desired outcomes. Measuring corporate character Just as our personal habits predispose us to behave in particular ways, an organizations processes predispose it to certain patterns of behavior. Virtues are those habits which incline us to behave in morally commendable ways, and our moral character is simply the unique constellation of virtues (and vices) we have developed during our lifetime. The total score from a SAIP application can be understood as a measure of organizational moral character. It numerically suggests the likelihood that a companys processes will consistently generate morally sound actions and behaviors. Unlike Benthams measurement process, the SAIP attempts to provide a measure of the source from which an organizations decisions and actions issue. Such measurement can aid the formation of a firms moral character by helping leaders assess the trajectory of its development over time. The SAIPs focus on moral character places it within a venerable tradition of ethical reflection extending from Aristotle to such contemporary philosophers as Alasdair MacIntyre. St. Thomas Aquinas, after whom our university is named, is a major figure

www.stthomas.edu/bmag/2008/Fall/MeasureEthics.html

2/3

3/30/12

B. : How Do You Measure Ethics?

within this tradition. We can hope that he is pleased to see such work undertaken at a university under his patronage. T. Dean Maines is president of the SAIP Institute at the Opus College of Business.

PRINT : EMAIL TO A FRIEND

2012 University of St. Thomas Minnesota Opus College of Business Schulze Hall 200 1000 LaSalle Avenue Minneapolis, Minnesota 55403 USA 1-651-962-4200 cob@stthomas.edu

Alumni Maps & Directions Giving Jobs at UST EEO Statement Directories RSS Feeds

www.stthomas.edu/bmag/2008/Fall/MeasureEthics.html

3/3