Name of Institution: (Seal) .. Department: . Name of the Teacher: ....................... Designation: . Length of Service in BKC: Year 1.

. Engaging theory Lectures:

Class & course (2) Subjects taught (3) Univ. Target (4) Lectures Engaged (5) % Target Achieved (6) Average of Col.(6) (7) 91-100 81-90 75-80 <75 MaxWt. (9) 10 Weight Achieved (10)

Duration 01st July to 30th June-.

SN (1) 01 02 03 04

Multiplying factors (8) % 1.0 % 0.8 % 0.5 % 0.0

2. Engaging Practical* /Tutorial Classes:

Class & course (2) Subjects taught (3) Target Turns (4) Turns Actually Engaged (5) Target % Achieved (6) Average of Col.(6) (7) MaxWt. (9) 10 Weight Achieved (8) x (9) (10)

SN (1) 01 02 03 04

Multiplying factors (8) 91-100 % 1.0 81-90 % 0.5 < 80 % 0.0

*If teacher is not required to conduct practical classes, Reproduce weight achieved in Item No1. 3. Attendance in theory Classes:
SN (1) 01 Class & course (2) Subjects taught (3) Sum of present students (4) Lectures Engaged (5) Student on Roll (6) Col(4)X100 (5) X (6) (7) Averag e of col.(7) (8) Multiplying factors (9) 81-100 61- 80 41-60 < 40 % 1.0 % 0.6 % 0.2 %0 MaxWt. (10) Weight Achieved (9)*(10)

(11)

02 03 04

20

4. Attendance in Practical / Tutorial Classes:

SN (1) 01 Class & course (2) Subjects taught (3) Sum of present students (4) Turns Actually Engaged (5) Student on Roll (6) Col(4)X100 (5) X (6) (7) Averag e of col.(7) (8) Multiplying factors (9) 81-100 % 1.0 61- 80 % 0.5 < 60 % 0 MaxWt. (10) Weight Achieved (9)*(10)

(11)

02 03 04

10

MET/BKC/Trust/HR/2012-13

5. Result Analysis of Theory Subjects:

SN (1) 01 Class & course (2) Subjects taught (3) No. of students appeared (4) Passed in all subjects (5) % ge passing (6) Average of col.(6) (7) Multiplying factors (8) 96-100 % 1.0 81- 95 % 0.8 61- 80 % 0.7 41- 60 % 0.5 < 40 % MaxWt. (9) Weight Achieved

(10)

02 03 04

10+

6. Marks scored by students in Theory subjects:

Class & course (2) Subjects taught (3) No. of students appeared (4) Total No. of Marks Scored by student (5) Av. % ge marks (6) Average of col.(6) (7) Multiplying factors (8) 91 -100 % 1.0 71 -90 % 0.9 51 - 70 % 0.6 < 50 % 0 MaxWt. (9) 10+ Weight Achieved

SN (1) 01

(10)

02 03 04

7. Comparison with 3 year-Average Results: (If 3 year average is above 80 %, and result is 80 % or above, multiplying factor shall be 1)
SN (1) 01 Class & course (2) Subjects taught (3) Average of 3 yrs. % (4) Result % ge as per Table 5 (5) Rise + Fall (6) Average of Col. (7) (7) Multiplying factors (8) Improvement by 20 % or more 1.0 11 - 20 % 0.7 01 - 10 % 0.5 For Fall 0.5 MaxWt. (9) Weight Achieved

(10)

02 03 04

10

8. Students Feedback: (Consider feedback of students having attendance more than 60 %.)
Class & course (2) On roll (N1) (3) Eligible (N3) (4) Actual recd (N3) (5) Total Score (S1) (6) Av. Score S2=(S1/N3) (7) Effective performance S3=S2xN3/N2 (8) Aver age (9) Multiplying factors (10) 81 -100 1 61 - 80 0.6 < 60 0 Max. Wt. Weight Achieved

SN (1) 01

(11)

(12)

02 03 04

9. Professional Endeavour: MET/BKC/Trust/HR/2012-13

SN 9.01 9.02 9.03 9.04 9.05 9.06 9.07 9.08

Particulars Member/office bearer of All India Professional body / University / Submitted copy of Notes / PPT / Transparencies of one subject. Improvement in qualification beyond eligibility / written Standard Text book / Member of Editorial Board of Technical Journal Guided M. Tech. / Me by Research Technical papers published at National / Inter-national Journals Technical papers Published at National / Inter-national Conference

Stipulated Weight M 02 each, OB 05 Max 05 No 0 Yes 05 No: 0 Yes 05 for anyone 03 each, Max 05 N-02, I/N 05, Max 05 N-02, 1/N 03, each - Max 05 Funding: Self Institute Any other Conf-03, J - 05, - Max 10 N 02, IN 05,Other 02,Max 05 2 each Max 10

W/A

Worked as Reviewer for International Journal/Conference Chaired/Co-Chaired Technical Conference Active Involvement In Consultancy / Organizing Seminars / Functions / Cultural Programmers / Examination / Committees At 9.09 Institute Level /NSS / Blood Donation / Plantation Camps / Sports / Extra Curricular / Any one College Level Portfolio / Career Fair Etc. Number of proposals submitted for R&D, MODROB / TAPTEC /DST 9.10 / CSIR / S&T / R.G. Cell Other funding agencies, etc 9.11 Number of Sponsored projects / Project Proposals Received Preparation of expansion Proposal/Compilation of data for 9.12 regulatory bodies/Industry tie up proposal Number of Expert Lectures delivered in a year beyond syllabus9.13 inside / outside institute Efforts made to update knowledge (Short term Courses attended / 9.14 CEP / Seminar / Workshops attended) related to department. Total weight Achieved out of 80

05 each 05 No 0, 05 each 1/S 03, 0/S 05, 05

Max 05 Max 05 Max 05 Max 05 Max-05

10. Functional Performance:

SN (1) 10.01 10.02 10.03 10.04 10.05 10.06 10.07 10.08 10.09 10.10 10.11 10.12 Performance Indicator to be assessed (2) Quality of Assignments given to the student Documentation as per NBA Innovation in Paper Setting / Evaluation Assessment of assignment / Unit Test / Sessionals / Tutorial Discussion in classroom on Sessionals / Unit Test / Assignment Record keeping of Assignments, Sessional marks Maintaining overall Students, Discipline Organising Sessional regularly Organising Industrial visits / Departmental activity Participation in Departmental seminars Preparing / Updating question banks Adding new experiments to lab Evaluation by Reporting Officer Excellent (3) Good (4) Average (5) Poor (6)

MET/BKC/Trust/HR/2012-13

SN 10.13 10.14 10.15 10.16 10.17 10.18 10.19 10.20 (a) (b)

Performance Indicator to be assessed Arranging Lectures of outside faculty from Industry/ NIT / IIT Regular checking of journals / Drawing sheets / Conducting special remedial classes for low profile students Display of Instructional material, Charts Information Innovations in Curriculum design and Case Study development Relation with Colleagues Relation with Seniors Proficiency in English Punctually / Sincerity Total Number of Tick Marks Weight allowed for each tick mark Weight achieved for each category

Evaluation by Reporting Officer Excellent Good Average Poor

04

03

01

(c) =(a) x (b)

Total weight Achieved out of 80

Sum of marks scored from Item 1 to Item 10= Final Assessment

SN 1 2 Particular of Assessment Total Weight Achieved Special weight by Reporting Officer (Ma Total performance out of 300 Performance out of 100 Rounded to next integer Score Special weight Special weight out of Max 50 to be given by Head of the Institution shall be based on 1) Extra ordinary contribution 2) Nature of subject thought (marks secured ) 3) Result Analysis based on nature of subject

Grade to be awarded by Reporting Officer as below: Scale for A.P and Selection Grade 100-90 -> A 90-81 -> B 80-61 -> C Below 60 -> D Scale for Lecturers / Senior Lecturers 100-81 -> A A -> Outstanding 80-61 -> B B -> Very Good, 60-51 -> C C -> Average Below 50 -> D D -> Poor

Comments if any,

Place Date MET/BKC/Trust/HR/2012-13

Signature of Reporting Officer (Seal)

Remark of Reviewing Officer: Note: Reviewing Officer may agree with the evaluation by Reporting Officer or may change by one grade above or below. I agree with assessment and evaluation made by the Reporting Officer I would like to change the grade given by the Reporting Officer as below Reasons for Change of Grade, if any Yes / No. Yes / No.

Final Grade Allotted: Place: .. Date : Signature of Reviewing Officer (Seal)

MET/BKC/Trust/HR/2012-13