Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes Peer Reviews: Malta 2012
PHASE 1
March 2012 (reflecting the legal and regulatory framework as at December 2011)
This work is published on the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of the OECD or of the governments of its member countries or those of the Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes. This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area.
Please cite this publication as: OECD (2012), Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes Peer Reviews: Malta 2012: Phase 1: Legal and Regulatory Framework, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264168848-en
Series: Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes Peer Reviews ISSN 2219-4681 (print) ISSN 2219-469X (online)
OECD 2012
You can copy, download or print OECD content for your own use, and you can include excerpts from OECD publications, databases and multimedia products in your own documents, presentations, blogs, websites and teaching materials, provided that suitable acknowledgement of OECD as source and copyright owner is given. All requests for public or commercial use and translation rights should be submitted to rights@oecd.org Requests for permission to photocopy portions of this material for public or commercial use shall be addressed directly to the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) at info@copyright.com or the Centre franais dexploitation du droit de copie (CFC) at contact@cfcopies.com.
TABLE OF CONTENTS 3
Table of Contents
About the Global Forum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Executive Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Information and methodology used for the peer review of Malta . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Overview of Malta . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Recent developments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14 Compliance with the Standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .17 A. Availability of information. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .17 Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .17 A.1. Ownership and identity information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18 A.2. Accounting records . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 A.3. Banking information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 B. Access to information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 B.1. Competent Authoritys ability to obtain and provide information . . . . . . . . 54 B.2. Notification requirements and rights and safeguards. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 C. Exchanging information. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C.1. Exchange-of-information mechanisms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C.2. Exchange-of-information mechanisms with all relevant partners . . . . . . . . C.3. Confidentiality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C.4. Rights and safeguards of taxpayers and third parties. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C.5. Timeliness of responses to requests for information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 62 67 68 69 70
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
4 TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary of Determinations and Factors Underlying Recommendations. . . . 73 Annex 1: Jurisdictions Response to the Review Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 Annex 2: List of all Exchange-of-Information Mechanisms in Force. . . . . . . . 76 Annex 3: List of all Laws, Regulations and Other Material Received . . . . . . . 80
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7
Executive Summary
1. This report summarises the legal and regulatory framework for transparency and exchange of information in Malta. The international standard which is set out in the Global Forums Terms of Reference to Monitor and Review Progress Towards Transparency and Exchange of Information, is concerned with the availability of relevant information within a jurisdiction, the competent authoritys ability to gain timely access to that information, and in turn, whether that information can be effectively exchanged with its exchange of information (EOI) partners. 2. Malta is an archipelago in the Mediterranean Sea and a member of the European Union. It is an international shipping center and has sought to afford a location for international financial services. 3. The legal and regulatory framework for exchange of information in Malta is in place. Ownership and identity information as well as accounting information is maintained by all relevant entities to the standard. In addition, much information must be filed with the government authorities, in particular the tax authorities and the commercial register. Full banking information is available in Malta, including records of all transactions. 4. The Maltese authorities have broad access to information for exchange of information purposes pursuant to the income tax laws, including bank and accounting information. Adequate rights and safeguards are in place that are compatible with effective exchange of information. 5. Malta has committed to the international standards of transparency and effective exchange of information and has a broad network of 66 treaties, almost all of which conform to the international standard in all respects. This includes agreements with all relevant partners and these agreements sufficiently protect the confidentiality of information received. Malta continues to expand its network of agreements. 6. Maltas response to recommendation in this report as well as the application of the legal framework to the practices of its competent authority will be considered in detail in the Phase 2 Peer Review which is scheduled for the second half of 2012.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
INTRODUCTION 9
Introduction
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
10 INTRODUCTION
Overview of Malta
10. Malta is an archipelago in the centre of the Mediterranean Sea, lying south of Sicily and east of Tunisia. The territories of Malta comprise the Island of Malta, the Island of Gozo and the other islands of the Maltese Archipelago, including the territorial waters thereof. Only its three largest islands are inhabited: Malta, Gozo and Comino. Its total area is 316 square kilometres. 11. Maltese and English are the official languages of Malta, but Italian is also widely spoken. Its population is 412 970. Malta achieved independence from the United Kingdom in 1964 and established its Constitution then, which has since been modified. Malta became a member of the European Union on 1 May 2004 and adopted the euro as its currency in 2008. 12. Malta is a republic with a parliamentary system of government. The Constitution of Malta establishes three branches of government: the legislative, executive and judiciary. The executive branch consists of the President of Malta, who is appointed by resolution of the House of Representatives and serves a five year term without possibility of re-election. 13. Its unicameral House of Representatives is elected by direct universal suffrage to serve for a five year term. It has exclusive jurisdiction to enact all main and subsidiary legislation, including tax laws. Prior to its publication and coming into force, each legislative act must go through a number of parliamentary procedures. A bill is then presented to the President of Malta for his assent and published in the Government Gazette, thus becoming a Parliamentary Act. The European Court of Justice may determine whether a Maltese law is in accordance with the EU treaty and with other EU legislation. A Cabinet of Ministers, one of whom is the Prime Minister, is appointed in accordance with the Constitution and includes a Minister for Finance. 14. Maltas judiciary is independent and consists of Superior and Inferior Courts. The Superior Courts are made up of the Constitutional Court, Court of Appeal and the Civil Court. The Inferior Courts include Court of Magistrates for the Island of Malta and Court of Magistrates for the Islands of Gozo and Comino. The judges of the Superior Courts and magistrates of the Inferior Courts are appointed by the President acting in accordance with the advice of the Prime Minister. Several tribunals fall within the category of Inferior Courts, such as the Financial Services Tribunal, which acts as a court and has jurisdiction to review actions under financial services laws (i.e. the Banking Act, Central Bank Act, Financial Institutions Act). The Administrative Review Tribunal has jurisdiction to review administrative acts, including cases involving tax assessments. 15. Maltas legal system is a mixed one, largely based on civil law, but with English law influences, particularly in commercial and financial law.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
INTRODUCTION 11
Where there is a lacuna in an area of the law having its origins in the law of the UK, the Common Law of the UK is referred to in order to interpret or fill it. Although the doctrine of precedent from Common Law was not inherited, Maltese judgements usually have a persuasive effect. Since Malta commenced the process of joining the EU in 1994, EU law has been the major external influence in the development of Maltese legislation. 16. The Maltese Constitution is the supreme law of the land, followed by Acts of Parliament (known also as primary legislation). Laws passed by Parliament need to be in conformity with full respect for human rights, generally accepted principles of international law and Maltas international and regional obligations in particular those assumed by the Treaty of Accession to the European Union. Malta has a comprehensive legal infrastructure with five main codes of law, namely: the Criminal Code, the Code of Police Laws, the Code of Organisation and Civil Procedure, the Commercial Code and the Civil Code. Primary legislation may enable and delegate power to Ministers to issue Regulations known as subsidiary legislation. By virtue of Article 10 of the Interpretation Act, subsidiary legislation is valid and has effect provided that it is lawfully made in accordance with the power that is conferred in the primary legislation. Implicit in the fact that this constitutes subsidiary legislation, it needs to be made in accordance with the power that is conferred in the primary legislation. Legislation, whether primary or subsidiary, needs to be passed through Parliament and is published by the Government Gazette. Authorities, like the Malta Financial Services Authority, on the other hand, may be empowered by Primary Legislation to make by-laws which usually take the form of an order or prohibition that are binding.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
12 INTRODUCTION
Financial Services
18. Malta has a significant financial services industry, which has grown significantly in the past three years. The financial services sector consists of credit and financial institutions, the insurance and insurance intermediaries business, investment services, collective investment schemes and pension and retirement funds. The collective funds industry has grown gradually in Malta. The total number of new funds from 2004 to June 2011 amounted to 661, of which 204 were surrendered (essentially the license granted by the MFSA was relinquished by the fund). The net asset value of funds domiciled in Malta is EUR 7.8 billion as at June 2011. There are also 157 collective funds not domiciled in Malta. Malta opened a stock exchange in 1992. 19. All financial services in Malta are regulated, monitored and supervised by the Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA). The MFSA may issue Rules regulating the procedures and duties of those licensed, authorised or supervised by it and may issue directives in writing which license holders must comply with. The Registry of Companies forms part of the MFSA. As at March 2011, the MFSA was responsible for regulating 25 credit and 13 financial institutions, 106 investment services companies and 49 insurance companies, among other entities and organisations. 20. The Central Bank of Malta oversees and regulates the operation of domestic payment systems, along with any form of cash or security transaction, whether domestic or cross border and no person can operate or participate in this system without approval and authorisation by the Central Bank. 21. The government in Malta is very welcoming to foreign investment and foreigners may own 100% of businesses in almost all sectors. There are more than 200 foreign companies with manufacturing operations in Malta. 1 There are also incentives which are administered by the Malta Enterprise Corporation. Incentives do not depend on whether a company exports or not, and include investment tax credits for projects that are approved a priori by the Malta Enterprise Corporation in writing, initial investment aid in respect of qualifying companies and special provisions for small businesses and incentives related to training and job creation. The Malta Enterprise Corporation was launched in 2004 and is tasked with attracting foreign direct investment into the island and providing the necessary support and assistance to businesses operating on the islands to improve their international competitiveness. It operates under an Executive Chairman and Board of Directors appointed by the Minister of Finance.
1.
According to Malta Enterprise, the agency responsible for the promotion of foreign investment and industrial development in Malta.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
INTRODUCTION 13
22. Professions relevant to the financial sector, such as notaries, lawyers, accountants and auditors are regulated in Malta. Notaries are regulated by the Notarial Council. The Committee for Advocates and Legal Procurators under the Commission for Administration of Justice Act investigates misconduct by lawyers. The Chamber of Advocates also acts to uphold ethics and professionalism among lawyers. The Accountancy Board investigates cases of professional misconduct and other disciplinary proceedings among accountants and auditors.
Taxation
23. The tax system in Malta is historically based on UK law and English Case law is used to interpret the tax laws in Malta whenever there are words and expressions that are not known to the law of Malta but are known to the English legislation. Such reference is allowed insofar as is necessary to give effect to the income tax legislation. Currently, the two main legislative sources of tax law are the Income Tax Act and the Income Tax Management Act (collectively, the Income Tax Acts). 24. Any person (whether a natural or legal person) who is both domiciled and resident in Malta is subject to tax on a worldwide basis. A company incorporated in Malta is considered to be resident and domiciled in Malta. A company incorporated outside Malta is considered resident in Malta only if the management and control of the company is exercised in Malta. The term management and control is not defined in Maltese tax law, however Malta advises that in practice in order to establish that management and control is in Malta, the Inland Revenue Department would take into account whether the board meetings of the company are held in Malta, whether general meetings are held in Malta, and whether any other decisions of the company are taken except at meetings in Malta. 2 If a foreign company is treated as resident in Malta because it is controlled and managed in Malta it will be subject to tax on income arising in Malta and foreign income (excluding capital gains) received in Malta. The same applies to individuals who are resident but not domiciled in Malta. The statutory rate of tax for corporations is 35% and for individuals the rates are progressive, ranging from 15-35%. 25. Malta has a full imputation system of taxation. When a company distributes dividends out of profits on which it has already paid tax, the amount of credit or refund to which the shareholder is entitled depends on the nature
2. Other features typically present to give substance to a claim of residency are that the companys financial records are held and maintained in Malta with the audited financial statements prepared and filed in terms of the principles enunciated in Maltese company lay, the majority of the directors are physically present in Malta to attend board meetings and some of the directors are resident in Malta.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
14 INTRODUCTION
and source of the income. Dividends paid out of trading income entitle a shareholder to a credit of 6/7 of tax paid, resulting in a net payment on corporate profits of around 5%. Distributions from passive income give rise to a credit of 5/7 of tax paid. When a company distributes profits on which it has not paid tax, it must withhold tax at a rate of 15%, although no withholding tax is due on dividends paid to non-resident shareholders. In addition, no tax is imposed on interest and royalties paid to a non-resident person, so long as the recipient is the beneficial owner of the income and does not carry on a trade or business through a permanent establishment in Malta. Income or gains from participating holdings in foreign companies are exempt from tax and there is no tax on gains realised from transfers of corporate securities by a non-resident, as long as the recipient is the beneficial owner of the gains and the securities are not held in a company whose assets consist principally of immovable property in Malta.
International Cooperation
26. Since Malta became a full member of the EU in 2004, EU legislation has become part of Maltese legislation. The extent to which EU legislation has an effect on Maltese law depends on whether the legislative instrument is a directive or regulation. As a member of the European Union, Malta is involved in the European common VAT system and as a consequence, in the VAT exchange of information that takes place under the EU regulation (EC) 1798/2003. 3 Malta also exchanges information automatically under the scope of the EU Savings Directive 48/2003/EC pursuant to which EU members (with the exception of Austria and Luxemburg), as well as other jurisdictions that are party to agreements, exchange data on an annual basis concerning the savings income received from Malta paying agents by taxpayers located abroad. 27. Malta has a network of 57 double tax conventions (DTCs) in force, with 9 DTCs and 5 Protocols to existing DTCs which are signed but not yet in force. Most recently, Malta signed a TIEA with Bermuda. Fifteen treaties currently await signature or further negotiation, two of which are tax information exchange agreements (TIEAs) that have been initialled.
Recent developments
28. Malta recently enacted a legal notice: the Cooperation with Other Jurisdictions on Tax Matters Regulations (Cooperation Regulations) on 22 July 2011. These regulations were enacted under enabling laws found in the Income Tax Acts and came into force on the date of publication. As subsidiary
3. A new regulation (EC) 904/2010 was adopted by the European Council on 14 October 2010 and will enter into force on 1 January 2012.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
INTRODUCTION 15
legislation, they have the same force and effect as law. The Cooperation Regulations were enacted to implement Maltas continued commitment toward transparency as expressed by the Terms of Reference created and used by the Global Forum. These Regulations complement rules in other laws, particularly concerning the availability of ownership, identity and accounting information. Malta determined that the best way to implement this commitment was to consolidate the relevant regulations in one piece of legislation so that affected persons are easily guided rather than having various pieces of legislation relating to the same subject matter. Furthermore, the Regulations will eventually include the relevant implementation measures in Council Directive 2011/16/ EU on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation that need to be implemented by the end of 2012. This Directive also reflects a broader commitment toward transparency. 29. Malta recently signed tax information exchange agreements (TIEAs) with the Bahamas and Gibraltar.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
A. Availability of information
Overview
30. Effective exchange of information requires the availability of reliable information. In particular, it requires information on the identity of owners and other stakeholders as well as information on the transactions carried out by entities and other organisational structures. Such information may be kept for tax, regulatory, commercial or other reasons. If the information is not kept or it is not maintained for a reasonable period of time, a jurisdictions competent authority may not be able to obtain and provide it when requested. This section of the report assesses the adequacy of Maltas legal and regulatory framework on availability of information. 31. All companies are required to register and submit an annual return, which includes ownership information, to the Registrar of Companies. Upon registration with the Registrar of Companies, information is immediately forwarded to the Inland Revenue Department. All bodies corporate, whatever their type, constituted or incorporated outside Malta, which establish a branch or place of business within Malta or are resident for tax purposes in Malta are required to register in Malta with the Inland Revenue Department and in certain cases with other authorities depending on the type of entity. 32. The Cooperation Regulations under the income tax laws require all entities and trustees in Malta to maintain ownership and identity information. The definition of entity encompasses any body of persons that is resident in Malta; is created under Maltese law; has a permanent establishment in Malta;
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
this fact and stating the name and residence of the member (Article 212, Companies Act). The same applies when a company ceases to be a single member company.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
and surname; passport, ID or tax identification number; or, if not available, the date and place of birth and the address of residence. For persons that are not individuals, it includes the name, date of inception or incorporation and the registered address (Regulation 4(5), Cooperation Regulations).
Regulated Entities
53. Protected cell companies (PCCs) carrying on the business of insurance have been possible in Malta since 2004 with the enactment of the Companies Act (Cell Companies Carrying on Business of Insurance) Regulations which made it possible for a company to be formed or constituted or converted into a cell company and to create within itself one or more cells for the purposes of segregating and protecting the cellular assets of the company (Regulation 2, Companies Act (Cell Companies Carrying on Business of Insurance) Regulations). In 2010 a new legal framework enabled the establishment of Incorporated Cell Companies (ICCs) under Maltese law (Companies Act (Incorporated Cell Companies Carrying on Business of Insurance) Regulations) 5, which came into effect on 1st February 2011. 54. Both PCCs and ICCs are limited to the business of insurance as defined under the Insurance Business Act 6 or of captive insurance in terms of the Insurance Business (Companies Carrying on Business of Affiliated Insurance) Regulations of 2003. 55. In a PCC, assets are segregated into protected cells, although the PCC remains a single legal entity. By contrast, an incorporated cell in an ICC has a separate legal personality and is treated as a separate company. Both PCCs and ICCs are required to file separate tax returns for each cell. 56. As they are created under the Companies Act, both PCCs and ICCs are subject to the requirements of the Companies Act. In the case of PCCs, the PCC itself is obliged to keep the register of members and indicate the owners of the PCC. The owners of the PCC are the owners of the cells (not necessarily each and every cell is owned by all the owners of the PCC). Furthermore the share capital of the PCC is the collective share capital of all the cells together. The directors of the PCC are obligated to keep cellular assets separate and separately identifiable from non-cellular assets and cellular assets attributable to each cell separate and separately identifiable from cellular assets attributable to other cells. In addition, the directors must keep separate records, accounts, statements and other documents for each cell distinctly (Regulation 10).
5. 6.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
Foreign companies
58. The Companies Act also applies to all bodies corporate, whatever their type, constituted or incorporated outside Malta that establish a branch or place of business within Malta. The Companies Act refers to such a company as an oversea company. Oversea companies may perform any type of business that may legally be undertaken in Malta. An oversea company may establish a branch in Malta by setting up a place of business in Malta and notifying the Registrar of Companies (Article 384, Companies Act). Branches do not have a legal personality separate from that of the foreign company, nor do they have to reincorporate in Malta. As at June 2011 there were 357 branches of foreign companies in Malta. 59. An oversea company that establishes a branch in Malta must deliver to the Registrar of Companies an authentic copy of its charter, statute, memorandum and articles constituting the company, together with a list of the directors and company secretary, or the person vested with the administration and representation of the company, within one month of opening the branch. Where such person is an individual, the list must include the individuals name, address, nationality and business occupation. Where such person is a body corporate, the list must include its corporate name and the address of its registered office. An oversea company must also deliver to the Registrar of Companies a return containing the following (Art. 385, Companies Act): name under which the branch or place of business is carrying on its activities, where this is different from the name of the oversea company; address of the branch and where more than one branch or place of business has been established there shall be indicated the address of the principal branch or place of business; activities to be carried out; and names and addresses of one or more individuals in Malta authorised to represent the company and the extent of such persons authority. 60. Unless the articles of the company already provide this information, the information required to be submitted to the Registrar of Companies also includes the legal form of the company and the identity of the register in which the oversea company is registered and its registration number. If any
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
change is made in the companys charter, statutes, memorandum or articles, its directors, company secretary or person with the authority to act for the company, or the names or addresses of the people authorised to represent the company, such changes must be filed with the Registrar of Companies within one month of the change (Article 386, Companies Act). 61. Under the tax laws, a company that is incorporated under foreign law but managed and controlled in Malta, or is neither incorporated nor managed and controlled in Malta but has income arising in Malta, must register for tax purposes and file an annual return in the same way as a domestic company (see paragraph 45 above). Oversea companies that are registered with the Registrar of Companies, because they have a branch, are automatically registered for tax purposes and must file an income tax return even if the income is not subject to tax in Malta (S.L. 372.09, Income Tax (Form of Return for a Company or Corporate Undertaking), Schedule A). Such registration would include ownership information, including any change in ownership. Along with its return, a company must also submit the records which are required to be kept under the Act. For companies registered in Malta this includes a balance sheet and profit and loss account with an audited report. Companies not resident in Malta must instead submit records of the companys activities in Malta. Such companies would include those that are not incorporated in Malta or not managed and controlled in Malta but which have income arising in Malta. 62. Foreign companies clearly fall within the definition of entity in the Cooperation Regulations, which includes any body of persons either resident in Malta, with a permanent establishment in Malta or registered, licensed or otherwise authorised to conduct business in Malta (Regulation 2, Cooperation Regulations). These requirements cover all foreign companies resident in Malta for tax purposes. Foreign companies are therefore required to maintain ownership in the same way as a domestic company (see Company Ownership Information Required to be Held by Companies section, above), meaning that the foreign company itself is required to keep updated information that identifies its owners and the level and type of their respective ownership stake.
Nominees
63. Ownership information on shares held by nominees is available in Malta by virtue of the Anti-Money Laundering legislation. Under the AML laws, any person acting as a nominee shareholder or providing for another person to act as a nominee shareholder is subject to the AML laws and therefore required to undertake customer due diligence measures (Regulation 4, Prevention of Money Laundering and Funding of Terrorism Regulations). This is the case whether the nominee is acting by way of business or not. Customer due diligence measures include identifying the beneficial owner and taking reasonable measures to verify the identity, such that the person
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
Conclusion
66. All companies are required to register and submit an annual return with the Registrar of Companies. In addition, all companies, including those incorporated outside Malta which establish a branch or place of business within Malta or are resident in Malta, are required to register in Malta with the Inland Revenue Department and submit an annual return which includes ownership information. Finally, the Cooperation Regulations require that all companies, including foreign companies that are managed and controlled in Malta, keep updated information that identifies their owners. The Regulations also require nominees to retain updated ownership information on any person for whom he or she acts. Therefore, ownership and identity information for companies is available, consistent with the international standard.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
to that effect, specifying the name and residence of any new partner, needs to be delivered to the Registrar of Companies for registration within one month by the partner or partners having the administration or representation of the partnership. The following partnerships must make an annual return: general partnerships or LPs the capital of which is not divided into shares where all of the partners have unlimited liability and partnerships or firms constituted or incorporated outside Malta which are comparable to a company or LP the capital of which is divided into shares. The return must specifically include a summary of the share capital, list of past and present members, particulars of directors and the company secretary (Seventh Schedule, Companies Act).
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
Conclusion
81. Both general and limited partnerships must register with the Registrar of Companies and also with the Inland Revenue Department if engaged in a trade, business, profession or vocation in Malta. In addition, all partnerships are subject to the Cooperation Regulations and therefore required to maintain ownership and identity information on all of the partners.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
at least three directors who are approved persons, it must establish adequate systems for maintaining proper records of identity and residence of beneficiaries, the dealings and the assets in connection with trusts and compliance with applicable law, and every person having a direct or indirect interest must be an approved person. When the trust is not constituted in Malta, it must be constituted or incorporated in an approved jurisdiction (Article 43(4)(i)). For an individual to be authorised, s/he must be a Maltese resident, an approved person and must have established adequate systems for maintaining proper records of the identity and residence of beneficiaries and of the dealings and the assets of trusts. 81. An approved person, for both a corporate and individual trustee, is a person with a good reputation who possesses experience and qualifications in financial, fiduciary, accounting or legal services and who is approved by the MFSA as fit and proper to carry out the duties of a trustee (Article 45(5)). 82. Authorisation to act as a trustee is not required where a trustee is carrying out an activity for which it is already licensed. This excludes persons licensed under the Banking Act, Investment Services Act, Insurance Business Act, or a person with a license for banking or insurance issued by an approved jurisdiction from the requirement to be authorised. An approved jurisdiction must be approved by the MFSA. 7 83. Non-professional trustees are referred to as private trustees pursuant to the Trust and Trustees Act and may act without authorisation from the MFSA (Article 43A, Trusts and Trustees Act). A trustee must be either authorised or private, otherwise s/he cannot act as a trustee in Malta. A private trustee is a person who is related to the settlor or has known the settlor for at least 10 years and in both cases is not paid for the services, does not hold him/herself out as a trustee to the public and does not act habitually as a trustee in relation to more than five settlors at any time.
7.
While there is no public list identifying approved jurisdictions, the MFSA, when determining whether a jurisdiction is reputable, refers to the definition in the Prevention of Money Laundering and Financial Terrorism Act which defines a reputable jurisdiction as any country having appropriate legislative measures for the prevention of money laundering and the funding of terrorism, taking into account that countrys membership of or any declaration or accreditation by any international organisation recognised as laying down internationally accepted standards for the prevention of money laundering and for combating the funding of terrorism, and which supervises natural and legal persons subject to such legislative measures for compliance therewith. Malta advises that MFSA would review the FATF and MONEYVAL statements which are issued regularly.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
(ii) the provisions of Regulation 3 of the Cooperation Regulations which provides that the regulations apply in order to ensure the effective cooperation with other jurisdictions on tax matters where arrangements that enable such cooperation are in place and shall be interpreted accordingly; (iii) the provisions of Regulation 4(12) of the Cooperation Regulations that require that such updated information is to be kept in a way that it may be submitted without difficulty to the Commissioner; and (iv) the provisions of the Code of Conduct for Trustees (see below). 87. The MFSA issues a Code of Conduct for Trustees that applies to both authorised trustees in terms of the Trusts and Trustees Act and to persons who are not required to obtain authorisation but are nonetheless acting as trustees (Code of Conduct, Paragraph 2). Pursuant to Article 52(1) of the Trusts and Trustees Act, the Code is binding on trustees. 88. The Code requires that a trustee be fully aware of the objects of the trust and must be satisfied that it is being established for a lawful purpose. Trustees must have full knowledge of the trust arrangement and must retain a copy of all the records pertaining to the trust business in their files, have adequate policies and procedures in place to ensure that they know the identity of the co-trustees, custodians, each settlor, protector, enforcer and, where appropriate, the principal beneficiaries to the fullest extent possible. Although there is no definition of principal beneficiaries, Malta advises that the term is interpreted to mean beneficiaries that are individually appointed either through the terms of the trust deed or arrangement, or (in the case of a discretionary trust having a class of potential beneficiaries), those persons are individually appointed by the trustee as beneficiaries. Therefore, for purposes of the Code of Conduct, this requirement includes the identification of all beneficiaries. The trustee should have information on their personal circumstances and residence. This information must be kept up to date. They must also verify the source of all assets and be satisfied that they are not of illicit origin (Code of Conduct page 7-8). The Code of Conduct for Trustees requires trustees to keep and preserve the required records in Malta. The records must include such records as are appropriate for the trustees functions and as required by any applicable law and will enable the provision of information to persons interested in trusts and entitled to the information on a timely basis. 89. In addition to the above requirements under the Cooperation Regulations and the Code of Conduct for trustees, the AML laws require that a person providing trustee services, regardless of whether they are authorised under the Trusts and Trustees Act, is deemed to be carrying out a relevant activity (Regulation 2, Prevention of Money Laundering and Funding of Terrorism Regulations) and therefore must take due diligence measures to identify the customer. This applies to both professional and non-professional trustees. The AML laws define beneficial owner as the natural person who
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
Conclusion
90. Ownership information on trusts, including the settlor and beneficiaries, is available in Malta for trusts established under Maltese law as well as foreign trusts with a trustee resident in Malta pursuant to the Cooperation Regulations which requires that a trustee keep such information. In addition, although trusts are not required to be registered in Malta unless they have income tax liability, all trustees, with the exception of private trustees, must be authorised by the MFSA and all trustees are subject to the AML laws. Where a trust is created under the laws of Malta but has no other connection with Malta, there may be no information about the trust available in Malta.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
mandatory (Art. 37, Civil Code). If there is a council it must have at least one member with no restrictions on residence (Article 37(1), Civil Code). Private foundations must have beneficiaries, either specifically identifiable or as a group. If no beneficiaries are identifiable, the foundation is deemed to be for the private benefit of the founders. The founder of a foundation may also be a beneficiary. 94. A foundation may establish segregated cells in order to achieve a particular purpose within each cell (Article 20(1), Second Schedule, Civil Code). A segregated cell exists when it is formally established either by the statute of the foundation at its creation or subsequently by the administrators pursuant to a power vested in them by the statute. A segregated cell is not a legal person, but does have its own distinct name or designation (Article 20(3)). The assets of the cell must be segregated from all other assets of the foundation and are held and administered separately and distinct accounts must be maintained in relation to each cell. The existence or termination of each cell must be disclosed in the reports and accounts of the foundation (Article 20(6)). For ownership information purposes (see below) the laws as applicable to the foundation apply to each cell.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
101. Founders may add to the assets of the foundation, in which case the administrators must notify any change in assets to the Registrar within 3 months of such change. For cash endowments, a certified copy of the relative bank deposit statement must be included and filed with the Registrar for Legal Persons (Article 34(3)). This applies to both private and purpose foundations equally. For private foundations, the founders may amend the deed and add or remove beneficiaries. While the founder may freely amend the deed and substitute or add beneficiaries, the Registrar for Legal Persons needs to be notified. When a purpose foundations statute is amended, the administrator of the foundation must notify the Registrar within 14 days of the change and deliver a copy of the amended document (Regulation 5, Civil Code (Second Schedule)(Notifications and Forms) Regulations). 102. The Registrar for Legal Persons may require any additional information from any person that it deems necessary for the foundations registration. However, for private foundations, this cannot include a copy of the statement of beneficiaries, although the MFSA could request this (proviso to Article 31(9), Second Schedule, Civil Code).
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
Conclusion
109. Ownership and identity information on the founders, administrators, supervisory council and beneficiaries of foundations would be available, as the foundation is required by the Cooperation Regulations, among other things, to maintain such information.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
financial statements are available publicly, and the registration is published in the Government Gazette. 112. Cooperatives are required to keep records of their transactions and affairs, and must also do all things necessary to ensure that all payments from their accounts are correctly made and properly authorised and that adequate control is maintained over the assets of, or in the custody of, the society and the expenditures incurred by it. Cooperatives are considered to be companies for the purposes of income tax legislation and have identical annual return and registration requirements (see Companies section above). However, a cooperatives income is exempt from tax (Article 12(1)(q), Income Tax Act). Ownership information is publically available (Article 12, Co-operative Societies Act) 113. An association is made up of three or more persons, with assets and liabilities separate and distinct from its members, administrators and beneficiaries (Art. 27(1), Second Schedule, Civil Code). Civil partnerships are a form of association. Associations do not have to register with the Registrar for Legal Persons, but if they wish to be vested with legal personality they must do so (Art. 3(1)). 114. The agreement establishing an association must be in writing and will be null if it is not. This agreement must state: its name, registered address in Malta, its purpose, the method by which membership is granted, composition of the board of administration and names of the first administrators, manner in which administrators are elected/removed, legal representation, if administrators are non-residents, the name and address of a person resident in Malta who has been appointed to act as the local representative of the association in Malta, among other things (Article 49(2), Second Schedule, Civil Code). For associations that register, an authenticated copy of the constitutive instrument must be filed with the Registrar for Legal Persons An association can be created by public deed, but does not have to be. When the association is created by a public deed, an authentic copy of the deed must be delivered by either the administrators or the Notary publishing the deed at registration (Art. 51(2). 115. Associations (including civil partnerships) are treated as a body of persons for income tax purposes, therefore they have the same requirements as general partnerships under the income tax laws (see Partnerships section above for general requirements). In addition, because the definition of entities in the Cooperation Regulations includes any body of persons, and this term is defined in the Income Tax Code, the parent act of these Regulations, as any body corporate, including a company and any fellowship, society or other association of persons whether corporate or unincorporated and whether vested with legal personality or not (Article 2, Income Tax Act), the ownership and identity requirements in these Regulations would apply to both cooperatives and associations. Therefore, ownership and identity requirements consistent with the international standard and would be available for these entities.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
AML laws
120. Under the AML laws, when a subject person carries out customer due diligence measures in an established business relationship, but doubts arise about the veracity or adequacy of the previously obtained customer identification or changes have occurred in the circumstances surrounding the business relationship, the customer due diligence measures must be repeated (Regulation 7(7), AML Regulations). A subject person who contravenes this obligation is subject to an administrative penalty of not less than EUR 250 to 2 500 without the possibility of recourse to a court hearing (Regulation 7(12), AML Regulations).
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
Companies
121. Both public and private companies are required to keep a register of members which must include both share and share warrants. The penalty for failure to keep a register of members is, for every officer of the company who is in default, a penalty of EUR 465.87, and a further penalty of EUR 23.29 for each day during which the default continues (Article 123(4), Companies Act and Eleventh Schedule, Companies Act). 122. Companies are also required to register with the Registrar of Companies. Although there is no specific monetary penalty for failure to register, an unregistered company cannot be said to have come into existence and therefore would not enjoy limited liability under the Companies Act (Article 68). Furthermore, all persons that carry on business or enter into agreements in the name of or on behalf of a company in respect of which a certificate of registration has not been issued under the Companies Act, or before the date indicated in the certificate of registration as the date on which the company comes into existence, shall, unless otherwise agreed, be personally and jointly and severally liable for their dealings with third parties entered into by them in the aforementioned capacity (Article 78(1), Companies Act). 123. All companies are required to register with the Registrar of Companies. When there is a transfer of shares in a company, a company is required to register the change with the Registrar of Companies within 14 days. If a company fails to register such changes, every officer including the director, manager or secretary, is liable to a penalty of EUR 465.87 plus EUR 23.29 for each day it continues. 124. When a company ceases to be a company its name is struck from the register of companies. The liquidator of the company must keep all of the documents of the company for ten years from the date of the publication of the companys name being stricken from the register. If the liquidator fails to comply with this, he/she is liable to a penalty of EUR 1 164.69 (Article 342(2), Companies Act). 125. An oversea company that fails to comply with registration requirements and obligations to registration of alterations is liable to a default penalty of EUR 465.87 and a further penalty of EUR 23.29 for each day the offence continues.
Partnerships
126. Partnerships must notify the Registrar in writing within one month from when a partner begins or ceases to be a partner or of any change to the deed (Article 19, Companies Act). Failure to do so results in a penalty of EUR 465.87 and a further penalty of EUR 23.29 for each day the offence
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
Trusts
130. The penalty for a trustee who fails to comply with any of the requirements of the Trusts and Trustees Act is, on conviction, liable to a fine of up to EUR 466 000 or to a term of imprisonment up to four years, or both (Article 51(6)). A trustee that contravenes or fails to comply with an authorisation, directive, obligation or other requirement made by the MFSA may be liable for an administrative penalty of up to EUR 93 174.94 (Article 51(7)).
Foundations
131. When a foundation (private or purpose) is not registered within the prescribed three month period, the persons responsible for such registration are liable to a penalty of EUR 232.94 each (Art. 31(10), Second Schedule, Civil Code).
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
Cooperatives
132. The statute of every cooperative must be registered with the Co-operatives Board, including any amendment to the statute. Failure to register a change of address with the Co-operatives Board exposes the co-operative to a penalty of EUR 116.47. Furthermore, every society must send an updated list of its members to the Co-Operatives Board at the end of December of each year, which list shall be open for inspection to the public at the office of the Board. The penalty for violation of this obligation exposes the co-operative to a penalty of EUR 116.47 and EUR 69.88 per month or part thereof. 133. For associations, although the Civil Code is silent with regard to specific monetary penalties concerning associations in general, associations are subject to the Income Tax Acts and the Cooperation Regulations and the penalties are the same as for other entities.
Determination and factors underlying recommendations
Phase 1 determination The element is in place.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
Companies Act
140. Additional accounting requirements for both companies and partnerships in Malta are found in the Companies Act. The Companies Act requires that companies and partnerships the capital of which is divided into shares keep proper accounting records with regard to: (a) all sums of money received and expended by the company and the matters in respect of which the receipt and expenditure takes place; (b) the assets and liabilities of the company; (c) if the companys business involves dealing in goods: statements of stocks held by the company at the end of each accounting period of
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
the company; all statements of stock takings from which any such statement of stocks has been prepared and, except in the case of goods sold by way of ordinary retail trade, statements of all goods sold and purchased showing the goods and the buyers and sellers in sufficient detail to enable all these to be identified (Article 163(1), Companies Act). 141. Records are considered to have satisfied the requirements of the Companies Act if they are sufficient to explain and show the companys transactions such that they disclose with reasonable accuracy, at any time, the financial position of the company at that time; and enable the directors to ensure that any balance sheet and profit and loss account prepared under company law comply with the requirements of such legislation (Article 162(2), Companies Act). For failure to comply with the accounting requirements of the Companies Act, the penalty, upon conviction, is a fine of up to EUR 11 646.87 for every officer of the company. If an officer can show that s/he acted diligently and that the default was excusable, s/he can avoid the conviction and penalty (Article 163(6), Companies Act). 142. The Companies Act also requires that directors file annual financial statements and that parent companies file consolidated accounts. These statements must include a profit and loss statement, balance sheet, notes to the accounts, and anything else required under the relevant accounting standards adopted in Malta. 8 Smaller entities are subject to simplified annual financial statement requirements pursuant to the General Accounting Principles for Smaller Entities Act (GAPSE). These standards can be used by companies that generally have fewer than 250 employees, assets below EUR 17.5 million, revenue below EUR 35 million, are not publicly traded, and are not financial institutions. All companies accounts must be audited in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and a report must be made to the companys members. The auditors report must state whether the accounts have been properly prepared in accordance with the Companies Act, and in particular whether they give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the company (Article 179, Companies Act). 143. LPs that are expressly limited to the collective investment of their funds must maintain accounting records under the Companies Act that are: sufficient to show and explain the partnerships transactions; disclose with
8. These include International Accounting Standards (IAS), International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and related Interpretations (SIC-IFRIC interpretations), which standards and related interpretations are issued or adopted by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). These rules are contained in subsidiary legislation to Maltas Accountancy Profession Act and the Accountancy Profession (Accounting and Auditing Standards) Regulations.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
Commercial Code
145. The Commercial Codes accounting requirements apply to all traders and acts of trade done by any person, even though not a trader (Article 2, Commercial Code). Trader is further defined as any person who, by profession, exercises acts of trade in his own name (Article 4). This includes commercial partnerships (but not companies and partnership en commandite the capital of which is divided into shares as record keeping for these is regulated by the Companies Act. All traders must keep books, letters, invoices and telegrams they receive. The books consist of the following: waste-book: with evidence of every commercial transaction a trader makes, along with the conditions or terms to which the transaction is subject (Article 14); journal: must show the day-by-day transactions concluded by the trader, along with debts, credits, negotiations, acceptances and endorsements of bills (Article 15); cash-book: must show in detail, daily sums received and paid out, balanced at least once per month (Article 16);
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
inventory book: yearly inventory with a description and value of the whole estate, assets and liabilities along with their nature and origin, with a balance showing profits and losses (Article 17). ledger: must show and accurate and up-to-date record of transactions classified as personal and impersonal accounts that may be used to draw and true and correct picture of the state of affairs of the business at any time (Article 19). 146. Civil partnerships, which are a form of association (see paragraphs 114-116 above) must have at least one administrator responsible for keeping records. These must include records of all assets and liabilities along with all income and expenditures of the partnership for the annual financial period (Second Schedule, Civil Code). In addition, if the civil partnership meets the definition of trader under the Commercial Code it is also subject to those accounting obligations.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
Civil Code
150. Foundations are subject to the accounting requirements in the Civil Code. Pursuant to the Civil Code, administrators must keep records of all assets and liabilities and income and expenditures of the foundation for annual financial periods (Article 10(1), Second Schedule, Civil Code). A beneficiary has a right to inquire about the conduct of the administration and the administrators must provide full and accurate information about the state and the amount of the foundation property, including the accounts of the foundation (Art. 38(1), Second Schedule, Civil Code).
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
It must also keep wage sheets and payroll records in order to substantiate any deductions taken (Article 23(12), Income Tax Management Act). An entity that owns immoveable property in Malta must also keep an account of all proceeds and expenditures relating to transfers of the property that would be subject to the property transfer tax.
Conclusion
158. All relevant entities in Malta are required to keep accounting records to the international standard pursuant to the Cooperation Regulations, which require that entities keep reliable books of account that correctly explain all transactions of the company, enable the financial position of the company to be determined with reasonable accuracy at any time and allow the financial statements to be prepared. These accounting records include underlying documents, such as invoices and contracts, and must be retained for a minimum of nine years.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
institution that is for the time being authorised or required to be authorised. It also includes any activity of a financial institution carried on by a person who is authorised or required to be authorised under the Financial Institutions Act. 162. As subject persons for AML purposes, banks and other financial institutions are required to retain documents and information for use in any investigation or an analysis of possible money laundering (Article 13(1), Prevention of Money Laundering and Funding of Terrorism Regulations).
Determination and factors underlying recommendations
Phase 1 determination The element is in place.
electronic devise, issued on receipt of funds of an amount not less in value than the monetary value issued and accepted as a means of payment by undertakings other than the issuer. The licence of such institution is restricted to issuing of electronic money (Article 2(5), Banking Act).
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
B. Access to information
Overview
163. A variety of information may be needed in a tax enquiry and jurisdictions should have the authority to obtain all such information. This includes information held by banks and other financial institutions as well as information concerning the ownership of companies or the identity of interest holders in other persons or entities, such as partnerships and trusts, as well as accounting information in respect of all such entities. This section of the report examines whether Maltas legal and regulatory framework gives the authorities access powers that cover the right types of persons and information and whether rights and safeguards would be compatible with effective exchange of information. 164. The Maltese authorities have broad powers to access information, including ownership and identity information as well as accounting records, pursuant to the Income Tax Acts and this power can be used to obtain information for exchange of information purposes. These powers apply whether Malta could access the information for its own tax purposes or not. Malta also has sufficient compulsory powers in place in order to compel information, including fines and imprisonment. 165. There are no bank secrecy provisions in Maltas laws that would impede access to bank information pursuant to a request for information under a treaty. Further, the attorney-client privilege standards that would apply to information pursuant to an EOI request is found in the Cooperation Regulations and is identical to the standard found in the OECD Model. 166. Rights and safeguards, including notification requirements with exceptions in specific cases, are in place that would not unduly delay or impede exchange of information.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
Ownership and identity information (ToR B.1.1); accounting records (ToR B.1.2); and use of information gathering measures absent domestic tax interest (ToR B.1.3)
167. Competent authorities should have the power to obtain and provide information held by banks, other financial institutions, and any person acting in an agency or fiduciary capacity including nominees and trustees, as well as information regarding the ownership of companies, partnerships, trusts, foundations, and other relevant entities including, to the extent that it is held by the jurisdictions authorities or is within the possession or control of persons within the jurisdictions territorial jurisdiction, ownership information on all such persons in an ownership chain. 10 Competent authorities should also have the power to obtain and provide accounting records for all relevant entities and arrangements. 11 168. Pursuant to the Income Tax Management Act, the Commissioner of Inland Revenue in Malta has broad powers to access information as often as s/he deems necessary. This includes such information as may be necessary in order to provide information, including documents, to foreign tax authorities where arrangements between Malta and the respective State or its tax authorities exist for the reciprocal exchange of information for tax purposes (Article 10A(1)). The statute specifically provides that the powers apply even if the Commissioner could not collect the relevant information for the purposes of Maltas income tax acts (Article 10A(2)). The term arrangements is defined in the Cooperation Regulations to include: any agreement, convention, protocol or EU Directive pursuant to which Malta may cooperate on tax matters with another jurisdiction through the exchange of information and any administrative agreement or MOU reached between the competent authority of Malta and another jurisdiction with which an arrangement is in place, provided that it is not contrary to the arrangement (Regulation 2). 169. Procedurally, the Commissioner must notify in writing the person from whom the information is being requested (Article 10A(1)). Notification must either be served on a person individually or be sent by registered mail to the persons last known business or private address.
10. 11. See OECD Model TIEA Article 5(4). See JAHGA Report paragraphs 6 and 22.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
170. to:
The Commissioners power to access information includes the power require a person to complete and deliver any return specified in the notice; summon any person the Commissioner has reason to believe is able to give information required for the purpose of the request, to attend before him and to examine such person under oath or otherwise; require any person to produce for examination any books, documents, accounts (including bank statements, passbooks and other bank documents) and any other documents which the Commissioner may require or a copy or extract thereof; require any person to give information by means of written statements; require any person to authenticate in an appropriate form any document or copy of a document prepared or held by that person or an extract thereof; require any person to confirm on oath any declaration made by him or any document prepared by him; require any person to provide information, documents or written statements in such other form as the Minister may prescribe (Art. 10A(4), Income Tax Management Act).
171. The Cooperation Regulations elaborate on and strengthen these requirements by providing that the Commissioners powers should be interpreted so as to give the widest possible powers to obtain and provide information to the competent authorities of jurisdictions with which Malta has an arrangement. In this respect, the Commissioner may use any information-gathering powers granted under the Income Tax Acts in order to obtain the information requested, notwithstanding that the information may not be required for purposes of the Income Tax Acts in Malta (Regulation 5(2), Cooperation Regulations). Such powers include those under the Income Tax Management Act to require the production of information (above), as well as the Commissioners audit powers under Article 24C, or powers to access the premises under Article 20 (below). 172. When information is held by a person or entity subject to the AML laws, the tax authority may recover the information either directly from that person or it may require the Financial Intelligence Analysis Unit (FIAU, which is the competent authority in Malta for AML matters) to provide the information if it is held by the FIAU.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
Bank secrecy
178. Some of Maltas laws contain provisions that would protect bank secrecy, however, these provisions are overridden in the laws themselves, and therefore bank secrecy would not impede Maltas ability to exchange information. Specifically, the Income Tax Management Act provides that no request for information can be made to certain licensed persons unless the request concerns their own personal tax liability. The definition of licensed persons includes licensees under the Banking Act, the Insurance Business Act, the Investment Services Act, or the Financial Markets Act (Article 17). According to the Income Tax Management Act, the Commissioner can only request this information in cases related to tax evasion. However, the access powers in Article 10A of the Act (discussed above) expressly override any secrecy requirement when the information is necessary in order to provide information to foreign tax authorities where there is an exchange of information agreement between the parties. Therefore, Article 10A would apply notwithstanding any restriction relating to the disclosure of information. Furthermore, Regulation 5(1) of the Cooperation Regulations makes it clear that the provisions of Article 10A are to be interpreted to give the widest possible powers in order to obtain and provide information. 179. The Banking Act provides that no person, including past and present officers or agents of a bank, shall disclose any information relating to the affairs of a bank or its customers which s/he has acquired in the performance of his duties under the Act and its regulations. However, there is an exception when authorised to do so under a provision of any law or to enable the Central Bank of Malta or the competent authority, as the case may be, to satisfy their respective obligations arising under Maltas international commitments (Article 34(2), Banking Act). Therefore, this does not serve to restrict access to bank information. 180. For financial institutions generally, the Financial Institutions Act provides that past or present officers or agents of a financial institution, shall not disclose any information relating to the affairs of that institution or of its customers that is acquired in the performance of their duties. However, there is an exception when the employee is either authorised to do so under the Act, or when lawfully required to do so by any court or provision of any law (Section 25(2), Financial Services Act). 181. The Professional Secrecy Act provides that when employees and officers of financial and credit institutions become the depositaries of any secret confided in them that is secret because of their office, they cannot be compelled to give information to the public authority unless there is a law that requires them to do so (Article 3(1)). Disclosing of a secret is treated as a criminal offence (Article 257, Criminal Code). However, the Commissioners access powers under Article 10A of the Income Tax would override this,
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
Attorney-client privilege
183. Maltese law includes protections for information subject to attorneyclient privilege. Specifically, the Cooperation Regulations have a provision that is very similar to the OECD Model TIEA and states that no person may be requested to provide information that would disclose any trade, business, industrial or commercial secret, or information which is the subject of attorney client privilege or information the disclosure of which would be contrary to public policy. The Regulations further define information which is the subject of attorney client privilege as confidential communications between a client and a lawyer or other legal representative produced for the purposes of seeking or providing legal advice or for the purposes of use in existing or contemplated legal proceedings (Proviso to Regulation 5(1)). This is consistent with the international standard.
Determination and factors underlying recommendations
Phase 1 determination The element is in place.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
12.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
C. Exchanging information
Overview
188. Jurisdictions generally cannot exchange information for tax purposes unless they have a legal basis or mechanism for doing so. This section of the report examines whether Malta has a network of information exchange that would allow it to achieve effective exchange of information in practice. 189. Malta has a network of 65 DTCs and 1 TIEA developed over almost four decades. It continues to negotiate new agreements and to update old agreements through Protocols and new treaties. 190. As a member of the European Union, Malta is involved in the European common VAT system and therefore the VAT exchange of information that takes place under the EU regulation (EC) 1798/2003. 13 Malta also exchanges information automatically under the scope of the EU Savings Directive 48/2003/EC pursuant to which EU members (with the exception of Austria and Luxemburg), as well as other jurisdictions that are party to agreements, exchange data on an annual basis concerning the savings income received from Malta paying agents by taxpayers located abroad. Malta also exchanges information under the scope of the EU Mutual Assistance Directive 77/799/EEC. 191. Maltas agreements generally provide for exchange of information to the standard. These agreements cover all relevant partners (any jurisdiction who has asked to enter into an EOI agreement) as well as Maltas significant economic partners. Each of its agreements contains a confidentiality provision that conforms to the standard, and its domestic laws adequately protect the confidentiality of information received as well as the rights and safeguards of taxpayers and third parties.
13.
A new regulation (EC) 904/2010 was adopted by the European Council on 14 October 2010 and will enter into force on 1 January 2012.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
196. Of the agreements signed by Malta to date, the majority specifically are not restricted by Article 1, meaning that exchange of information is possible in respect of all persons. Treaties with Austria, Bulgaria, the UK, Pakistan, Norway, Canada, India, Tunisia, Libya, and Isle of Man do not contain specific language to say that the treaty is not restricted by Article 1, however, these treaties all extend to exchange of information for purposes of implementing the domestic laws of the states, and to the extent that the domestic laws apply to residents and non-residents alike, the exchange of information provisions apply to all persons. 197. Maltas DTC with Malaysia does not contain specific language to say that it is not restricted by Article 1. As discussed in C.1.1., the treaty is specifically limited to exchange of information for purposes of the convention, does not extended to the domestic laws of the contracting states and the scope of the treaty applies to residents of one or both contracting states. Therefore, Malta cannot exchange information under this treaty in respect of all persons. It is recommended that Malta update this agreement to conform to the international standard. Malta advises that this treaty is currently being renegotiated.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
China, Israel, Luxembourg (Protocol), Poland (Protocol), Turkey and Bermuda (TIEA).
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
205. Maltas TIEA with Bermuda is identical to the OECD Model and provides that information shall be exchanged without regard to whether a jurisdiction needs it for its own tax purposes. 206. Of Maltas 66 agreements, 22 15 contain Article 26(4), which provides for exchange of information without regard to whether a jurisdiction needs it for its own tax purposes. Of those that do not specifically contain this provision, treaties with Austria, Malaysia, Norway, Australia, Canada, Hungary, the Netherlands, the UK, India, Denmark, Qatar, and Barbados allow for exchange of information without a domestic tax interest restriction in its domestic laws. Although there are no restrictions in Maltas domestic law, such restrictions may exist in other jurisdictions with which Malta has an agreement but which has not yet been reviewed by the Global Forum.
Exchange of information in both civil and criminal tax matters (ToR C.1.6)
208. Information exchange may be requested both for tax administration purposes and for tax prosecution purposes. The international standard is not limited to information exchange in criminal tax matters but extends to information requested for tax administration purposes (also referred to as civil tax matters). 209. Only one of Maltas agreements, its DTC with Spain, limits exchange of information to criminal tax matters. Specifically, the Malta-Spain DTC limits exchange of information to cases of tax fraud (as discussed in C.1.3 above). However, as discussed above, as EU member countries, Malta and Spain can exchange information to the standard Malta advises that as there is reciprocity this is not an issue.
15. DTCs with Belgium (Protocol), France (Protocol), Italy (Protocol), China (new DTC), Spain, Singapore (Protocol), Ireland, the US, San Marino, Isle of Man, Georgia, Jersey, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, Poland (Protocol), Uruguay, Switzerland, Germany (Protocol), Hong Kong, China, Israel, Luxembourg (Protocol) and Turkey.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
217. Ultimately, the international standard requires that jurisdictions exchange information with all relevant partners, meaning those partners who are interested in entering into an information exchange arrangement. Agreements cannot be concluded only with counterparties without economic significance. If it appears that a jurisdiction is refusing to enter into agreements or negotiations with partners, in particular ones that have a reasonable expectation of requiring information from that jurisdiction in order to properly administer and enforce its tax laws it may indicate a lack of commitment to implement the standards. 218. Malta has a large treaty network, covering all of its significant partners, including regional partners, EU member countries and its main trading partners. Maltas main trading partners are within the EU, and are primarily Italy, France, the UK and Germany. Its treaty partners include: every EU member country, 30 of 34 OECD member countries and 10 of 15 non-EU G20 member countries. 219. Comments were sought from the jurisdictions participating in the Global Forum, and in the course of preparation of this report, no jurisdiction advised that Malta had refused to negotiate or enter into an agreement. 220. Malta recently signed a TIEA with Bermuda and advises that it is currently negotiating TIEAs with The Bahamas, Gibraltar and Macao, China. In addition, Malta is negotiating DTCs with Azerbaijan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Guernsey, India, Mexico, Norway, Oman, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Thailand and Ukraine.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
C.3. Confidentiality
The jurisdictions mechanisms for exchange of information should have adequate provisions to ensure the confidentiality of information received.
Information received: disclosure, use, and safeguards (ToR C.3.1); all other information exchanged (ToR C.3.2)
221. Governments would not engage in information exchange without the assurance that the information provided would only be used for the purposes permitted under the exchange mechanism and that its confidentiality would be preserved. Information exchange instruments must therefore contain confidentiality provisions that spell out specifically to whom the information can be disclosed and the purposes for which the information can be used. In addition to the protections afforded by the confidentiality provisions of information exchange instruments countries with tax systems generally impose strict confidentiality requirements on information collected for tax purposes. 222. All of Maltas treaties contain a confidentiality provision that conforms to the standard. In addition, Malta has provisions in its domestic laws that reinforce this confidentiality provision. Specifically, the Income Tax Management Act provides that every person who has an official duty or who is employed in the administration of the Income Tax Acts must regard and deal with all documents and information relating to the Income Tax Acts or copies thereof as secret and confidential and every person must make an oath to this effect (Article 4(1)). 218. In addition, a person who is appointed under or employed in carrying out the provisions of the Income Tax Acts cannot be required to disclose to any court, tribunal, Board or committee of enquiry, anything learned in the performance of his/her duties under the Act. There are however, exceptions in the following cases: When necessary for the purpose of carrying into effect the provisions of the Income Tax Acts; or
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
for the purpose or in the course of a prosecution for any offence committed against any of the provisions of the Income Tax Acts; or for the disclosure to any authorised representative of any other Government of such information as is required to be disclosed in terms of any arrangement between Malta and other States or their tax authorities providing for the reciprocal exchange of information for tax purposes. 219. The penalty for any person who communicates or attempts to communicate information contained in the documents outlined above is guilty of an offence and on conviction liable to a fine of from EUR 232 to EUR 2 325, or to imprisonment for up to 6 months or both (Article 53, Income Tax Management Act).
Determination and factors underlying recommendations
Phase 1 determination The element is in place.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
conditions on exchange of information. Maltas domestic laws have generally been aligned to allow for the exchange of information without restrictive conditions.
Determination and factors underlying recommendations
Phase 1 determination The assessment team is not in a position to evaluate whether this element is in place, as it involves issues of practice that are dealt with in the Phase 2 review.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
Determination
Recommendations
Jurisdictions should ensure that ownership and identity information for all relevant entities and arrangements is available to their competent authorities The element is in place. Jurisdictions should ensure that reliable accounting records are kept for all relevant entities and arrangements The element is in place. Banking information should be available for all account-holders The element is in place. Competent authorities should have the power to obtain and provide information that is the subject of a request under an exchange of information arrangement from any person within their territorial jurisdiction who is in possession or control of such information (irrespective of any legal obligation on such person to maintain the secrecy of the information) The element is in place. The rights and safeguards (e.g. notification, appeal rights) that apply to persons in the requested jurisdiction should be compatible with effective exchange of information The element is in place. Exchange of information mechanisms should allow for effective exchange of information The element is in place. The jurisdictions network of information exchange mechanisms should cover all relevant partners The element is in place. Malta should continue to develop its EOI network with all relevant partners
The jurisdictions mechanisms for exchange of information should have adequate provisions to ensure the confidentiality of information received The element is in place.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
Determination
Recommendations
The exchange of information mechanisms should respect the rights and safeguards of taxpayers and third parties The element is in place. The jurisdiction should provide information under its network of agreements in a timely manner The assessment team is not in a position to evaluate whether this element is in place as it involves issues of practice that are dealt with in the Phase 2 review.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
ANNEXES 75
Malta would like to express its appreciation for the hard work done by the assessment team and the secretariat in evaluating Maltas legal framework and in drafting the Phase 1 report. It was a pleasure working with the assessment team and the secretariat. Malta agrees with the findings of the report.
* This Annex presents the Jurisdictions response to the review report and shall not be deemed to represent the Global Forums views.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
76 ANNEXES
Jurisdiction 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Albania Australia Austria Bahrain Barbados Belgium Bermuda Bulgaria Canada China Croatia Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Egypt Estonia Finland France Georgia
Type of EoI Arrangement DTC DTC DTC DTC DTC DTC DTC (Protocol) TIEA DTC DTC DTC DTC DTC DTC DTC DTC DTC DTC DTC DTC (Protocol) DTC DTC DTC (Protocol)
Date signed 2 May 2000 9 May 1984 29 May 1978 12 Apr 2010 28 Jun 1974 28 Jun 1974 19 Jan 2010 24 Nov 2011 23 Jul 1986 25 Jul 1986 23 Oct 2010 21 Oct 1998 22 Oct 1993 21 Jun 1996 13 Jul 1998 20 Feb 1999 3 May 2001 30 Oct 2000 5 Jul 1977 29 Aug 2008 23 Oct 2009 8 Mar 2001 17 Jun 2010
Date entered into force 23 Nov 2000 20 May 1985 13 Jul 1979 N/A 3 Jan 1975 3 Jan 1975 N/A N/A 1 Jan 1988 19 May 1987 1 Jan 2012 22 Aug 1999 11 Aug 1994 6 Jun 1997 30 Dec 1998 7 April 2001 22 Jan 2003 30 Dec 2001 1 Oct 1979 1 Jun 2010 30 Dec 2009 27 Dec 2001 19 May 2011
20 Germany
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
ANNEXES 77
Jurisdiction 21 Greece 22 Hong Kong, China 23 Hungary 24 Iceland 25 India 26 Ireland 27 Isle of Man 28 Israel 29 Italy 30 Jersey 31 Jordan 32 Korea (Rep. of) 33 Kuwait 34 Latvia 35 Lebanon 36 Libya 37 Lithuania
Type of EoI Arrangement DTC DTC DTC DTC DTC DTC DTC DTC DTC DTC (Protocol) DTC DTC DTC DTC DTC DTC DTC (Protocol) DTC DTC DTC DTC DTC (Protocol) DTC DTC DTC DTC DTC DTC DTC DTC (Protocol) DTC DTC DTC
Date signed 13 Oct 2006 8 Nov 2011 6 Aug 1991 23 Sep 2004 8 Sep 1994 14 Nov 2008 23 Oct 2009 29 Jul 2010 16 Jul 1981 13 Mar 2009 25 Jan 2010 16 Apr 2009 25 Mar 1997 24 Jul 2002 22 May 2000 23 Feb 1999 16 Apr 2009 5 Oct 1972 28 Dec 2008 17 May 2001 29 Apr 1994 30 Nov 2011 3 Oct 1995 4 Nov 2008 26 Oct 2001 18 May 1977 2 Jun 1975 8 Oct 1973 7 Jan 1994 6 Apr 2011 26 Jan 2001 26 Aug 2009 30 Nov 1995
Date entered into force 30 Aug 2008 N/A 29 Nov 1992 19 Apr 2006 8 Feb 1995 15 Jan 2009 26 Feb 2010 N/A 8 May 1985 24 Nov 2010 19 Jul 2010 13 Oct 2010 21 Mar 1998 19 Mar 2004 24 Oct 2000 10 Feb 2000 23 Mar 2010 5 Dec 1972 20 May 2010 2 Feb 2004 14 Feb 1996 N/A 1 Sep 2000 23 Sep 2009 15 Jun 2007 9 Nov 1977 22 Jul 1977 20 Dec 1975 24 Nov 1994 N/A 5 Apr 2002 9 Dec 2009 16 Aug 1996
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
78 ANNEXES
Type of EoI Arrangement DTC DTC DTC DTC (Protocol) DTC DTC DTC (Protocol) DTC DTC DTC DTC DTC DTC DTC DTC DTC DTC DTC DTC DTC Date entered into force N/A N/A 19 Jul 2005 15 Feb 2010 16 Jun 2010 29 Feb 2008 N/A 20 Aug 2000 12 Jun 2003 12 Nov 1997 12 Sep 2006 3 Feb 2006 N/A 16 Oct 2000 31 Dec 2001 N/A 18 May 2007 27 Mar 1995 23 Nov 2010 N/A
Date signed 15 Dec 2000 4 Jan 2012 3 May 2005 10 Sep 2009 9 Sep 2009 21 Mar 2006 20 Nov 2009 7 Sep 1999 8 Oct 2002 16 May 1997 8 Nov 2005 9 Oct 1995 25 Feb 2011 22 Feb 1999 31 May 2000 14 Jul 2011 13 Mar 2006 12 May 1994 8 Aug 2008 11 May 2011
53 Singapore 54 Slovakia 55 Slovenia 56 South Africa 57 Spain 58 Sweden 59 Switzerland 60 Syria 61 Tunisia 62 Turkey 63 United Arab Emirates 64 United Kingdom 65 United States 66 Uruguay
Multilateral agreements
Malta is a party to the: concerning mutual assistance by the competent authorities of the Member States in the field of direct taxation and taxation of insurance premiums. 17 This Directive came into force on 23 December 1977 and all EU members were required to transpose it into national legislation by 1 January 1979. The current EU members, covered by this
EU Council Directive 77/799/EEC of 19 December 1977 (as amended)
17.
A new Mutual Assistance Directive was adopted by the European Council on 15 February 2011 and will come into force on 1 January 2013.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
ANNEXES 79
Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom; and EU Council Directive 2003/48/EC of 3 June 2003 on taxation of savings income in the form of interest payments. This Directive aims to ensure that savings income in the form of interest payments generated in an EU member state in favour of individuals or residual entities being resident of another EU member state are effectively taxed in accordance with the fiscal laws of their state of residence. It also aims to ensure exchange of information between member states.
18.
1. Footnote by Turkey: The information in this document with reference to Cyprus relates to the southern part of the Island. There is no single authority representing both Turkish and Greek Cypriot people on the Island. Turkey recognises the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC). Until a lasting and equitable solution is found within the context of the United Nations, Turkey shall preserve its position concerning the Cyprus issue. 2. Footnote by all the European Union Member States of the OECD and the European Commission: The Republic of Cyprus is recognised by all members of the United Nations with the exception of Turkey. The information in this document relates to the area under the effective control of the Government of the Republic of Cyprus.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
80 ANNEXES
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MALTA OECD 2012
OECD PUBLISHING, 2, rue Andr-Pascal, 75775 PARIS CEDEX 16 (23 2012 07 1 P) ISBN 978-92-64-16883-1 No. 59905 2012
Please cite this publication as: OECD (2012), Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes Peer Reviews: Malta 2012: Phase 1: Legal and Regulatory Framework, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264168848-en This work is published on the OECD iLibrary, which gathers all OECD books, periodicals and statistical databases. Visit www.oecd-ilibrary.org, and do not hesitate to contact us for more information.
-:HSTCQE=V[]]XV: