Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Contents
3. Subsidy Evolution 4. Subsidy current trends 5. LPG Vision 2015 of Indian Government 6. Deregulation attempts 7. Conclusion
Fossil fuels to continue dominant role in the energy mix Low per capita consumption (377 kgoe) compared to world average (1660 kgoe)
kgoe : Kilogram Oil Equivalent
Hydro
6%
Nuc 1%
Oil 31%
Coal 53%
Gas 9%
Oil 29%
Coal 51%
Source : IEP 2006
Gas 12%
Indian Energy Sector Overview Demand Supply Gap for Crude Oil & LPG
Crude Oil Present Crude Oil Production: 34 MMTPA
180
MMT
21000
130 80 30 -20
*
TMT
18000 15000 12000 9000 6000 3000 0 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Year
Increasing Gap
31
2002
33
2003
33
2004
34
2007
41
2012
MMTPA
Production
Import
LPG 17%
LPG 87%
Use by Households While 87% of urban households are using LPG only 17% of rural population in India is on LPG. In rural areas firewood is the most common fuel, considering the availability and affordability
N.Dom : 6.9%
Auto LPG:1.7%
Fully Subsidized
Current Growth > 6% 89% of total LPG business
Dom: 89.2%
158
229
259 252 280
No Competition
Assured Returns
Subsidy - Characteristics
Subsidy- Difference between Desired and Actual Retail Selling Price
Under recovery Rs 5.52( $ 0.12 ) Under recovery ranges between Diesel per Litre 15 to 55% of the product cost Price Rs 38.1 ($ 0.85 ) depending on International prices. Under recovery Rs5.21 ($ 0.12 )
Initial subsidy of Rs. 67.75($ 1.5) per 14.2 Kg cylinder as on Mar2002 To be phased out in 3 years. Rs 22($ 0.5 )/ year. Then, Retail prices to be market determined in line with international Oil prices.
Due to domestic pressures and high international prices, scheme extended for five more years .
Shifted to a scheme with subsidy equally shared by Government, Upstream & down stream Oil Companies. Under-recoveries (Subsidies) of Oil Companies compensated by Government in the form of bonds
Increase in International Prices and Resistance from various quarters derailed the deregulation plan.
453.08 406.83
294.75 294.75 294.75
407.6
357.21
378.5
310.35
310.35
281.2 281.2
50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 0 PDS SKO Dom . LPG Pe trol De is e l 2003-04 3751 5523 2004-05 9480 8362 150 2154 2005-06 14384 10246 2723 12647 2006-07 17883 10701 2027 18776 2007-08 19102 15523 7332 35166 2008-09 28225 17600 5181 52286 2009-10 17364 14257 5151 9279
04
05
06
1M
1O
20
20
20
ar -0 8
-0 5
-0 6
-0 7
In Rs. Crores
Subsidy- Distortions
First Order
Losses to Government/OMCs
Diversion of subsidized product to commercial and Auto LPG use.
Loss of revenue to Government, Oil Companies
Second Order
Demand Supply Functions All strata of society i/c rich enjoying subsidy. ( Refineries making LPG instead of more efficient In efficient and excessive basket) consumption Inter fuel Substitution
Third Order
Diversion Governance Policy/Investments
Refineries, Gas Processing Plants & Imports 182 Bottling Plants 9396Distributors 114 million Customers
Consumption in a Year(KG)
2008-09
2009-10
102.9KG(7.2cyl)
100.0KG(7.0cyl)
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
More and more customer enrolment from lower strata of society and multiple connections Affordable prices necessary for lower strata of society.
66% of the Population consuming less than 6 cylinders per annum
Use of Technology
Segmentation and targeting subsidy in a country with 1.2 billion population Technological Solutions
Biometric based distribution pilot planned in three cities
Fully aligned with Unique ID project by Government of India- Expected Smart Card
Conclusions
International analysts look at subsidy sceptically
By books any subsidy is bad
For Indian LPG, subsidy is a double edged sword to steer way for
Cheaper fuel for masses Cleaner fuel for mankind
Oil Companies and Government of India are mastering the art of better subsidy administration through deployment of right technology
Avoid subsidizing the Product. Instead targeted customers to be given subsidy directly.
THANK YOU