Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
http://www.dictionaryslang.com/consensual rape
slang phrase: r00lz a-pooh-stics kalmoose half a gas can Magarick off-comm Saint Mattress Nastalie Academiac eef eef Pants Antler igorant warm brother lavinous aerodynamic capsketball vidjo party with paula jerkism Fat Factory pendulum case celluloid Iron Dragon Nigger Stompers Bean Dust chavalla nobby holder Home Bum Beyoncsque flid This is not the beat Milky Bootiecrunch plumber's smile Ateendriya poohnanny
Search http://www.dictionaryslang.com/consensual-rape
consensual rape
When two people are on the ground playfighting in positions that looks more like violent sex to anyone nearby.
Two people start talking, they start playfully arguing, and the next thing you know, consensual rape has occurred.
When, during the act of being raped, the victim offers to cooperate with the rapist. The impending rape becomes a win-win situation due to: 1) the rapist gets some and 2)the victim doesn't get the full effects of an actually, violent rape.
Rapist: "Be still or I'll kill you!!" Victim: "Whoa, whoa. Wait a minute! It aint got to be like that! Let's work this out, see if we both can come away from this in one piece. You do what you need to do and I'm gone just chill, then I'mma go on bout my business. It's win-win, man" Rapist (confused but still a rapist) "Well...ok. I don't feel like going to jail for murder, too." Victim: "Great, glad we can agree to a consensual rape. Go ahead and get the duct tape, let me go get a comdom."
(n) A situation in which an act of rape was consensual. You know it was consensual if the "rape" happens more than once. That way you know it is "consensual rape".
Dude, Becky went to a party and totally had consensual rape. Twice.
This occurs when a person attempts to rape another person, but in a turning of the tables, the other person then attempts to rape the first rapist. Resulting in simply angry sex.
First Rapist- "Hey I'm going to rape you!" Victim/second rapist- "No! I'm going to rape YOU!" First Rapist- "Okay! Consensual Rape!"
Upon a messy break-up, one or both parties of a relationship will wish they never had sex with the other person ever, thereby making each lovemaking session that
1 of 2
23.02.2012 10:34
consensual rape
http://www.dictionaryslang.com/consensual rape
2 of 2
23.02.2012 10:34
http://www.avvo.com/legal-guides/ugc/consensual-rape-in-california
Convictions Criminal Defense Rape Violent Crime Posted over 2 years ago. Applies to California, 6 helpful votes, 0 comments
1 of 2
23.02.2012 10:21
http://www.avvo.com/legal-guides/ugc/consensual-rape-in-california
We've detected that your browser does not support scripting. So lets think of what the logical reaction would be from must be enabled to use Avvo. Turn on scripting and reload this page. Scripting a man who found himself in the middle of intercourse and hears the word stop. (Assuming of course, that he clearly hears her; she is not whispering; his panting does not mask her word; and that her verbalization is clear, despite her own heavy breathing). Is he more likely to assume that she just changed her mind about having sex while having sex, or instead, that his wrist watch has caught her hair and hurt her; or that his finger nails scratched her; or that she wants to try a different position to finish; or that she simply wants to delay orgasm?
2 of 2
23.02.2012 10:21
http://justice4assange.com/Sexual-Offences.html
1 of 6
23.02.2012 10:31
http://justice4assange.com/Sexual-Offences.html
minor rape (0-4 years imprisonment) According to the evidence submitted to the court by Assanges defence counsel Bjrn Hurtig, a charge of minor rape implies "almost no violence or threats or injury where consensual sex is followed by sex without withdrawal of that consent but where the complainant is asleep or unconscious." The Swedish prosecutor, Marianne Ny, sought an arrest warrant for Julian Assange for ordinary rape, but this was downgraded to minor rape at the Svea Court of Appeal on 24 November 2010. The fact that the sex was consensual in all of the events is not disputed. One of the complainants, AA (Expressen, 21 August 2011), stated that both she and SW had consensual sex with Assange. Complainant AAs statements to the tabloid Aftonbladet (21 August 2010) also deny criminal intent on Assanges side or threat/use of force. According to complainant AA: "It is completely false that we are afraid of Assange and therefore didnt want to file a complaint. He is not violent and I do not feel threatened by him." Complainant AA
Description of the events that led to the rape allegation in the original interrogation
From the leaked partial police dossier, the allegations against Assange are in the public domain. Complainant SWs testimony of the event is not word-for-word, given that the interrogating officer, Irmeli Krans, reported the questioning in narrative form and in the police officers own words (see Investigation for an explanation of Krans prior friendship with complainant AA and conflict of interest). This testimony was not approved by complainant SW. It informed Prosecutor Eva Finns decision to terminate the investigation, because there were no grounds for rape, on 24 August 2010: "They sat on the bed and talked and he took off her clothes again. They had sex again and she discovered hed put the condom only over the head of his penis but she let it be. They fell asleep and she woke by feeling him penetrate her [De somnade och hon vaknade till av att hon knde honom trnga in i henne]. She immediately asked are you wearing anything and he answered you. She told him you better not have HIV and he replied of course not. She felt it was too late. He was already inside her and she let him continue. She couldnt be bothered telling him again. Shed been nagging about condoms all night long. Shes never had unprotected sex. He said he wanted to come inside her, he didnt say when hed done it but he did it. There was a lot running out of her afterwards." "She told him what happens if she gets pregnant. He replied that Sweden was a good country for raising children. She told him jokingly that if she got pregnant then hed have to pay her student loans. On the train to Enkping hed told her hed slept in Anna Ardins bed after the crayfish party. She asked if hed had sex with Anna but he said Anna liked girls, she was lesbian. But now she knows he did the same thing with Anna. She asked him how many times hed had sex but he said he hadnt counted. He also said hed had a HIV test three months earlier and hed had sex with a girl afterwards and that girl had also taken a HIV test and wasnt infected. She said sarcastic things to him in a joking tone. She thinks she got the idea of taking the drama out of what had happened, he in turn didnt seem to care. When he found out how big her student loan was he said if he paid her so much money shed have to give birth to the baby. They joked that theyd name the baby Afghanistan. He also said that he should always carry abortion pills that actually were sugar pills."
2 of 6
23.02.2012 10:31
http://justice4assange.com/Sexual-Offences.html
"His phone rang and he had a meeting with Aftonbladet on Tuesday at noon. She explained to him that hed not make the meeting on time and he pushed his entire schedule forward an hour. Then they rode her bicycle to the train station. She paid his ticket to Stockholm. Before they parted he told her to keep her phone on. She asked if hed ring her and he said he would." For legal opinions of whether Assange can be charged, and/or convicted, see Fair Trial for Julian Assange?.
3 of 6
23.02.2012 10:31
http://justice4assange.com/Sexual-Offences.html
those of the UK. By way of comparison, Swedens homicide rates were lower than its Scandinavian partners (save Norway - see UN Statistics on international homicide rates for 2007 and 2008 (last available stats)). The stated objective by the Minister of Justice that oversaw the biggest changes in the sexual offences laws over the past decade - Thomas Bodstrm (partner in the lawfirm Bodstrm&Borgstrm representing the complainants against Assange) - was to raise the conviction rate (see the graph at the top of this page). While the conviction rate has not risen commensurate with the soaring numbers of reported rapes, Sweden has achieved the third highest per capita rape conviction rates in the Council of Europe, and the second highest in the EU after Lithuania (Council of Europes European Sourcebook of Crime and Criminal Statistics 2010). The number of convictions for rape in Sweden trebled between 2004 and 2005 (from 1.7 to 4.9 per 100.000 people) as a result of the broadened definition of rape in the 2005 change to the legislation. The number of people convicted for rape per 100.000 people was around three times higher in Sweden than in England and Wales in 2006, and three times the European median. Latest Conviction rates available (2006) Country - Conviction rate/100.000 people Median - Council of Europe: 1.6 Lithuania: 5.4 Russia: 4.9 Sweden: 4.7 France: 2.9 Portugal: 0.5 Finland: 1.6 UK: England and Wales: 1.6 Netherlands: 1.7 Denmark: 1.1 The number of reported rapes far outpaces the number of convictions. Despite the extraordinary rise in conviction rates, Sweden was criticised in two recent reports for their reported rape vs. conviction ratio, one commissioned by the European Commission (2009) and one by Amnesty International (2008). Amnesty Internationals report condemned Swedens non-transparency in investigating and prosecuting reported rape cases, identified flaws in the investigation and subjectivity in the decision of whether the case should proceed or not: "the evaluation and analysis of rape cases is largely dependent on the motivation, knowledge and attitude of the investigators." "Amnesty International is concerned that a lack of prioritization and a lack of knowledge and training on how to interrogate witnesses and suspects, and how to secure the necessary evidence, may harm the quality of the investigation [emphasis added]."
4 of 6
23.02.2012 10:31
http://justice4assange.com/Sexual-Offences.html
"The assessment of the credibility of the victim and the accused, and the reasons for deciding whether to close the case or to proceed, are largely non-transparent ... Informal discussions concerning the credibility of the victim and the alleged perpetrator and whether the case will hold up in court or should be closed do not maintain the principle of due process of law [emphasis added]. Subjectivity, non-transparency, lack of predictability and weakened safeguards seriously undermines the system for all involved - complainants and suspects. Amnesty Internationals findings echo greater systemic problems in rape investigations - these have been addressed in a number of articles and a recent official report on failing standards in preliminary investigations (see Rule of Law, and Investigation). Furthermore, Swedish lawyers and jurists have denounced the subjective manner of adjudications in word-against-word rape trials (read more about due process in criminal proceedings in Sweden, in Fair Trial for Julian Assange?). Criticisms of the reformed sexual offences law 2005 The changes to the Sexual Offences law implied: A greater amount of criminal acts will be classified as rape. The threshold of what constitutes coercion is lowered. When someone has sex with a person that is in a helpless state because of unconsciousness, sleep or being under the influence of drugs, it will be considered to fall under rape. The lawyer Elvy Wicklund criticised several aspects of the new law: "the present law identifies all men as potential rapists, or males brimming testosterone who cannot control their urges, which is an insult to most men that are not this way" The law was passed too hastily (Johan Stenberg, Appeal Court Judge, Gta Hovrtt) Although more criminal acts are classified as rape, the difficulties regarding proof remain (Bengt Sjgren, Appeal Court Judge, Svea Hovrtt); and difficulties of determining intent remain (Karolina Lindenkrantz). Several legal experts have argued that the changes to the law and the general climate in Sweden when it comes to rape cases has removed due process safeguards and made it too easy to sentence a man for sexual offences. See Fair Trial for Julian Assange?. Mandatory expression of consent - the latest proposal for reform Several new proposal has been tabled for the reform of sexual crimes legislation. Marianne Ny is one of the legal experts behind this new proposal, together with Nils-Petter Ekdahl. The more controversial of the new reform proposals is the mandatory expression of consent prior to intercourse - the test of how consent is given has not been defined, although verbal and even written consent have been discussed as possibilities. This stringent proposal is defended by Madeleine Leijonhufvud. It is meant to protect victims of frozen fright, where the perpetrator does not need to use force or
5 of 6
23.02.2012 10:31
http://justice4assange.com/Sexual-Offences.html
the threat of force. The proposal (SOU 2010:71) has been on referral to the Swedish National Courts Administration, the Prosecutor General and the lawyers association have rejected the proposal in its current format. The debate about the need to introduce consent as a consideration in the sexual offences law has been ongoing for several years. Gran Rudling, the witness in the February Hearing (he was the person who first came across complainant AAs deleted tweets, see Facebook & Twitter Trails) has been campaigning for rape victims rights through the incorporation of consent into the law. 443 days under house arrest. Supreme Court hearing: 1st and 2nd February 2012 cc-by-sa Justice4Assange.com
6 of 6
23.02.2012 10:31