Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
December 5, 2007
EE 316 – Section #4
oscilloscope.
Page 2
Experiment Theory & Procedure
In any given AC RLC circuit, there is an unavoidable shift phase shift in the voltage
and current outputs due to the inherent non-real impedance present in these circuit
elements.
Given any particular RLC circuit, like the one shown above, it is possible to plot the
voltage across any two nodes on an oscilloscope display; setting the first channel to
display the input (source) voltage from the function generator, along with a second
channel showing the voltage across any element in the remainder of the circuit.
Page 3
Δt is the time difference (the “lag”) between the two signals, while T is the total period
From this generic circuit and the drawing of its voltage readings from an oscilloscope,
it is possible to determine the value of the Phase Angle (θ) in degrees by means of the
following equation:
∆𝑡
𝜃= × 360°
𝑇
It is also possible to determine the Phase Angle θ by other method. By setting the
possible to plot the two signals against one-another, making it possible to directly
Page 4
In the oscilloscope display above, there are four parameters that need to be taken into
𝑋𝑖
𝜃 = sin−1
𝑋𝑚
𝑌𝑖
𝜃 = sin−1
𝑌𝑚
Page 5
It is important to note that the value of the phase angle θ obtained in all three
1
𝑃= 𝑉 𝐼 cos 𝜃
2 𝑠𝑚 𝑚
1 2
𝑃= 𝐼 𝑅
2 𝑚
Vsm and Im respectively represent the maximum source voltage (v-peak) and the
𝑉
current passing through the branch in question (generally,𝑅 ). Θ is the phase angle
(also known as the power-factor) for the branch for which the average power
average power dissipation over any given period of time is zero; as a result of their
intrinsic behavior which simply converts power (and therefore energy) from one form
to another, without actually using any of it. For that reason, the average power
reactive elements present, in this case, the resistors. In other words, the presence of
Page 6
Determining the Thevenin Equivalent Circuit
All basic current and voltage laws that apply to DC circuit analysis are also fully-
which can be used to replace any linear circuit, no matter how complex, with a simple
circuit consisting of no more than a voltage source and a resistor. In an AC circuit, the
only difference is that instead of a voltage source and resistance, a voltage source and
For the circuit above, it is possible to determine the Thevenin equivalent circuit as
seen by the general impedance “Z” (or the circuit between points ‘a’ and ‘b’).
The same steps used to determine the parameters for the DC Thevenin equivalent
circuit are also used to find its AC counterpart:
1. Find Vth by removing “Z” from the circuit and attaching an oscilloscope or
DMM across points ‘a’ and ‘b’. The RMS value will be presented on the DMM’s
display, and the frequency will be the same as the original input frequency.
2. Find ISC by checking the current across points ‘a’ and ‘b’ with a DMM.
3. Calculate Zth as follows:
𝑉𝑡ℎ
𝑍𝑇𝐻 =
𝐼𝑆𝐶
Page 7
The final Thevenin circuit will be as follows:
According to the Maximum Power Transfer Theorem, or Jacobi’s law, the power that
can be transferred in a circuit with a fixed internal resistance is when the external
This same law is applicable to all AC circuits in a similar manner. When the load in a
RLC circuit has the same impedance as the internal impedance, maximum power
circuit is Zth; as was calculated above. In this case, the maximum power transfer can be
achieved when the impedance Z (in the circuit above) or, more generically, Zload is
equal to Zth.
Page 8
Results
Part 1
The 5.7 volt power supply is a 16V peak-to-peak function generator set at 400Hz.
Measured values:
R1: 1.24 kΩ
R2: 1.23 kΩ
Page 9
RL (Inductance) Branch Readings
The oscilloscope reading for this circuit (ideal simulation with Multisim, not the actual
reading!):
Actual measured values (from the lab) for the RL (inductance) branch:
𝑉
𝐼𝐿 = 𝑅1 = 2.66 mA
1
∆t: 0.44 ms
T: 2.5 ms
∆𝑡
𝜃= × 360° = 63.36°
𝑇
Page 10
And in X-Y Mode:
𝑋𝑖
𝜃 = sin−1 = 60.27°
𝑋𝑚
𝑌𝑖
𝜃 = sin−1 = 61.0°
𝑌𝑚
𝑉
𝐼𝐶 = 𝑅2 = 3.33 mA
2
∆t: 0.4 ms
T: 2.5 ms
∆𝑡
𝜃= × 360° = 57.6°
𝑇
Page 11
And when the oscilloscope is operating in X-Y mode:
𝑋𝑖
𝜃 = sin−1 = 60.0°
𝑋𝑚
𝑌𝑖
𝜃 = sin−1 = 63.82°
𝑌𝑚
1 1
𝑃𝐿 = 𝑉𝑠𝑚 𝐼𝑚 cos 𝜃 = (8)(2.66 × 10−3 ) cos 60 = 5𝑚𝑊
2 2
1 1
𝑃𝐿 = 𝐼𝑚 2 𝑅 = 2.66 × 10−3 2
1200 = 4.2𝑚𝑊
2 2
1 1
𝑃𝐶 = 𝑉𝑠𝑚 𝐼𝑚 cos 𝜃 = (8)(3.33 × 10−3 ) cos 60 = 6.66𝑚𝑊
2 2
1 2 1
𝑃𝐶 = 𝐼𝑚 𝑅 = 3.33 × 10−3 2
1200 = 6.6𝑚𝑊
2 2
Page 12
Part 2
R1: 1.24 kΩ
R2: 470 Ω
R3: 3.24 kΩ
Rdc: 50 Ω
Using the same methods employed in the previous section (oscilloscope in X-Y and
Voltage-Time modes) for the measurement of the voltage across each element in the
Page 13
circuit combined with the phase angle for that measurement, the following values
were obtained:
1 4.4 39.5
2 1.6 -55.7
3 4.4 -43
ab 4 25.1
L 3.4 61
C 2.15 51.8
According to Kirchhoff’s Voltage and Current laws (which, like all other core circuit
analysis techniques, are applicable in both AC and DC circuits) state the voltages
𝑉𝑎𝑏 = 𝑉𝐿 + 𝑉2 = 𝑉𝑐 + 𝑉3
𝑉1 + 𝑉2 + 𝑉𝐿 − 𝑉𝑠 = 0
Vab VL + V 2 VC + V 3 Vs V1 + V 2 + VL V1 + V 3 + V C
Page 14
Part 3
Measured values in the process of determining the Thevenin equivalent circuit for the
kΩ.
Page 15
Discussion of Results
In this particular experiment, the measured results as taken in the laboratory were not
particularly close to the expected theoretical results that were obtained a simulation of
In dealing with reactive circuit components, such as inductors and capacitors, there is
a relatively-large discrepancy between the idealized theoretical results and the actual
outcome of the experiment due to the non-reactive resistance present in these real-life
components, which adds a fairly significant amount of excess power dissipation and
All circuit drawings and depicted outputs/results in this report were obtained by
replicating the actual experiment in a simulator, and indicate the idealized, theoretical
output. The simulations performed (and the screen captures of the oscilloscope output
results obtained for the phase shifts in the first section show considerable deviation
from the expected output. In particular, the results obtained in the balancing of
current and voltage in the second section is not in-line with the expected outcome.
Page 16
Conclusion
This experiment served to verify the laws governing the analysis of AC circuits, and
successfully resulted in the analysis of the phase shift angles in multiple circuits (in
the first and second portions of the experiment procedure) and the determining of the
correct Thevenin equivalent circuit (and with it, the maximum power transfer
In the first section, the presence of a systematic error that offset our results by a
consistent value was observed. In all six measurements of the phase angle,
approximately the same phase angle was determined (at or around 60 degrees);
though that value is not consistent with the theoretical measurements. This indicates
a constant factor that led to incorrect but consistent results, in keeping with the core
important calculation to be able to obtain the highest quality of a large output signal
Page 17