Debra Scott Julian Young FRIT 8132 Technology Plan Evaluation Part 1

Criteria Goals and realistic strategy for using telecommunication s and information technology

3 - Exemplary Goals are broad and clearly related to learning outcomes. Goals are linked to objectives and are measurable. Goals clearly answer the questions: Who? When? How?

2 - Proficient Goals are broad and clearly related to learner outcomes, but are not completely clear. They are linked to objectives, but are not measurable.

1 - Emergent Goals are not present or not related to learning outcomes.

Score

Professional development strategy

Professional Development provides great detail about the current state of technology competencies. Explains methods of addressing deficiencies and how to improve PD in the future. Provides clear and complete information about the school's technology. Technology inventory is thorough and up-to-date. Detailed information about the learning environment (including classrooms, computer labs, library, media center, student center, and more) is provided.

Provides a general overview of Professional Development. Includes general details about current and future plans.

Professional Development not present or lacks detail about current and future plans. 2

Assessment of telecommunication services, hardware, software, and other services needed

Provides general information about the school's technology. Technology inventory focuses on hardware with little mention of software or networking. Technology inventory is included, but lacks detail.

Provides little or no information about the school's technology. Technology inventory is not included. 1

Budget resources

Provides a complete prioritized list of tech projects including budget estimates. Specifically aligned with goals and objectives. Budget sources are identified as well as alternative funding resources.

Provides most, but not all, of the project, timelines, and budget estimate information. Appears to be generally consistent with plan goals.

Provides little information about tech project priorities or budgets. Not aligned with goals and objectives. Funding information is not present.

Ongoing evaluation process

An evaluation process and instrument are described in detail, and is comprehensive in nature. Assessment is timely, and tied to the objectives.

An evaluation process and instrument is described in detail, but lacks complete comprehensiveness. The link to goals and objectives is not apparent.

Lacks description of evaluation process. An evaluation instrument is not described. 2