Works Cited Primary Sources Eisenhower, Dwight D. Introduction to Outer Space. 26 Mar. 1958. Reference Collection. N.p.: n.p.

, n.d. 1-2,6,13-15. Nebraska Studies. Web. 10 Jan. 2012. <http://nebraskastudies.org>. This letter addressed to the people by President Eisenhower really showed the objectives he had for the time after the Sputnik Satellite. This proved to be a very good primary source. Glenn, John. Transcript of John Glenns Official Communication with the Command Center. 1962. Our Documents. N.p.: n.p., n.d. N. pag. Our Documents. Web. 10 Jan. 2012. Krieger, F.J. Announcement of the First Satellite. 5 Oct. 1957. Reference Collection. N.p.: n.p., n.d. N. pag. Nebraska Studies. Web. 10 Jan. 2012. <http://nebraskastudies.org>. This primary source from 1958 was also a lot like President Eisenhowers letter in the sense that it occurred before Apollo 11. This wasnt so great of a source though. Man Walks on Another World. National Geographic 31 July 1969: n. pag. Print. This source was really good for tables and information about the mission. It was alosn a very good example of a primary source. Men Walk Safely on the Moon. Bedford Gazette 21 July 1969: n. pag. Archives. Web. 19 Feb. 2012. <http://archives.com/genealogy/newspaper-genealogy-moon-landing.html>. This was a really cool primary source that helped explain how important this mission was to not only America, but also the world. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The First Lunar Landing: As told by the Astronauts. Washington D.C.: n.p., n.d. Print. This primary source was a great way of looking at the reactions of the 3 astronauts of the crew and see what they really thought about the mission. It was really helpful for quotes from the 3 themselves.

National Aeronautics and Space Administration. In This Decade Mission To The Moon. By Thomas O. Paine. N.p.: n.p., n.d. Print. This source was published as well before the mission to the moon. However, it provided an excellent amount of photographs taken of the design of the aircraft, as well as the moon itself, which was very helpful. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Log of Apollo 11. N.p.: n.p., n.d. Print. This was one of my most useful primary sources, as it provided the entirety of the mission within a couple pages. It explained every single detail that happened during the mission, and was overall just a helpful source. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Manned Space Flight Team. Washington, D.C.: n.p., 1964. Print. This primary source helped me learn about the history and background of the 3 astronauts flying in Apollo 11. This was a really helpful source because it gave me the complete accomplishments of the astronauts and really benefited to my knowing of them. National Aeronautics and Space Asministration. Exploring the Moon and Planets. By William R. Corliss. Washington, D.C.: n.p., 1969. Print. While the Apollo 11 Mission had just occurred before the publication of this pamphlet, this document gave me a lot of background knowledge of what NASA thought the Moon was before the further exploration of the Apollo Missions Wilford, John Noble. U. S. and Soviet See Key Exploration Role for Space Station; Orbiting Laboratory Would Be the Base for Longer Flights. The New York Times 13 Oct. 1969: n. pag. The New York Times. Web. 10 Jan. 2012. <http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html? res=F00D17F83D5E11738DDDAA0994D8415B898AF1D3&scp=8&sq=space+exploratio

n&st=p>. This was a great article that summarized the feelings of both the U.S. and the Soviet Union after the launch of Apollo 11. It was a pretty cool primary source

Secondary Sources Allison, Elise. Apollo 11. University Of North Carolina Education. DLR, n.d. Web. 19 Feb. 2012. <http://ils.unc.edu/dpr/path/apollo11/>. This database included most of the information of the mission. It was a very helpful source for both information and multimedia. Apollo 11 Spacecraft. Tripod. N.p., n.d. Web. 29 Feb. 2012. <http://collshubby.tripod.com/ spacecraft.html>. This was a really good source for getting information about the spacecraft in general. It proved to be a great secondary source Armstrong, Neil A. Interview by Nadia M. Oracle Education Foundation. N.p., n.d. Web. 25 Jan. 2012. <http://library.thinkquest.org/07aug/00861/armstrongiscool.htm>. While this interview is a primary source with Neil Armstrong himself, it wasnt very useful because he was interviewed so many times in the other sources that I had. Ultimately this wasnt a very good source Astronaut Biographies. NASA. NASA, Mar. 2008. Web. 28 Feb. 2012. <http://www.nasa.gov/ centers/glenn/about/bios/bio.html>. This was a good for learning about the bios of the 3 astronauts in their mission. Cortright, Edgar M., ed. Apollo: Expeditions to the Moon. Washington, D.C..: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1975. Print. This was definitely one of the best of any of my primary or secondary sources that I had. All 311 pages in the book concern the

missions, spacecraft, and astronauts of the Apollo missions in its entirety and definitely was the most useful of any of my other sources. Garber, Steven. Sputnik. NASA. NASA, 10 Oct. 2007. Web. 28 Feb. 2012. <http://history.nasa.gov/sputnik/>. While this website mostly focused on the Sputnik 1, it provided a lot of information on the Space Race as well. It was a very good informative secondary source. July 20,1969: One Giant Leap For Mankind. NASA. N.p., n.d. Web. 10 Jan. 2012. <http://www.nasa.gov>. This article proved to be good to find what the real positives that were taken out of the mission. While it was only a secondary source, it was good for that reason. NASA- Apollo 11. NASA. N.p., n.d. Web. 25 Jan. 2012. <http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/ apollo/missions/apollo11.html>. This website was a good source to get started out with. It provided a lot of background information on th emission in general Remembering Apollo 11. Boston Magazine: n. pag. Boston.Com. Web. 26 Feb. 2012. This was a very good Informational source to use. Revolutions In Astronomy. N.p.: n.p., n.d. Print. This book was in really bad shape and had a couple of the first few pages missing, otherwise it had some good summaries about the different missions that happened before Apollo 11 The Space Race. History. N.p., n.d. Web. 28 Feb. 2012. <http://history.com/topic/coldwar>. This was a really cool video on History.com that really showed the competition between the United States and The Sovies Union. Teague, Kipp. Apollo 11 Image Gallery. NASA History Web Curator. NASA, n.d. Web. 19 Feb. 2012. <http://history.nasa.gov/ap11ann/kippsphotos/apollo.html>. This online source was

really helpful for finding images with the Apollo 11 mission for the website. It made it a lot easier than having to transfer images from a book to the website We Choose the Moon. John F. Kennedy Presidental Library and Museum, n.d. Web. 26 Feb. 2012. <http://htwechoosethemoon.org/>. This was a really cool source to have.It included a full in-depth analysis of the mission in 11 different steps and included many images, audio recordings, and information.