Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
presents articles focusing on managerial applications of management practices, theories, and concepts
Going Global and Taking Charge: The Road Ahead for the Indian Manager
Achal Raghavan
Executive Summary
Till a few years back, the term MNC (Multinational Corporation) in India meant an organization with its headquarters located outside of India, and having a presence in India as a part of its global network. In other words, in Indian eyes, MNC meant a foreign company which has come into India. In recent times, however, the business world has seen the emergence of a new breed of companies which is beginning to be referred to as Indian MNCs. The Indian MNC is a company which is Indian in origin, now spreading its wings to set up operations in various markets around the world. Increasingly, Indian MNCs have resorted to mergers and acquisitions (M&As) as a favourite method for jump-starting their global expansion. Tata Steel, Hindalco, Suzlon, Bharat Forge, and Sundram Fasteners are typical examples of such Indian companies. As more Indian companies push ahead with their aggressive global growth strategies, many middle and senior management personnel in these organizations are faced with significant challenges. They have to go global and take charge in a very short time, and learn how to manage complex businesses on a global scale. They need to acquire the managerial skills needed to deal with varied customer needs and diverse competitive forces; learn to work with team members from different cultural backgrounds; and also learn how to manage the companies that have been acquired through the M&A route.
KEY WORDS Emerging Indian MNC Middle and Senior Management Global Mindset Coping Strategies Cultural Integration
In this article, we take a look at these new challenges the Indian manager has to face in this era of globalisation of emerging Indian MNCs, and suggest some strategies to cope with them. We examine the elements of the global mindset that is becoming essential for the Indian managers success, and explain the key dimensions of three research-based models that will help him understand cultural differences that prevail across the globe. We also examine some real-life examples of the strategies that Indian MNCs have begun to adopt, as they pursue their vision of becoming global leaders in their industries.
61
These trends go to show that the Indian MNC is here to stay; and in each of these instances, the companies involved will have to work through the challenges (and the inevitable mistakes) involved in transforming themselves into truly global organizations. Let us now examine what this means for the operating managers in these organizations.
INDIAN COMPANIES GOING GLOBAL: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE INDIAN MANAGER The Dominance of the Customer
A key feature of todays global markets is the emerging dominance of the customer over the companies that compete for her attention and business. Through information media like the internet and global television channels, todays customer has instant access to a wealth of information on any product or service that she may be interested in. Supply chain efficiencies have made it possible for companies to make their products available at competitive prices across world markets. This has resulted in a vast shift in power away from the companies, and towards the customer. The Indian manager has to understand and accept this fact, and discard any beliefs to the contrary that he may have acquired over time in the Indian market where the customer still does not enjoy this dominance in many cases. In any case, with increasing globalisation, competitive forces in the Indian (domestic) market itself are getting more intense by the day, pointing to the rising importance of the Voice of the Customer (VOC) in todays business.
62
GOING GLOBAL AND TAKING CHARGE: THE ROAD AHEAD FOR THE INDIAN MANAGER
ferent markets, and significant investments in brandbuilding over long periods of time. In scale and complexity, this exercise will test the Indian managers capabilities like never before.
world, and develop an operating culture for the team which builds bridges across the cultural differences that will inevitably surface. While it is unrealistic to expect that every manager entering the global arena will exhibit all of the above elements of a global mindset, it is important for the manager to recognize that these requirements do exist, and make efforts to develop and strengthen areas where he is relatively weak.
63
In India, public face (i.e., the persons standing and image among colleagues) is crucial at individual level. Feedback of the negative kind even when couched in the most objective terms is best given behind closed doors, and not in a group meeting. The West is less cognizant of such sensitivities. Deadlines and commitments are still reasonably elastic missing a target date for a response by a day or two is not seen as a major issue. In Germany, this would be seen as unprofessional. As stated earlier, these are generalisations about India, and many of these are getting modified under the relentless pressure of globalisation; but given that these traits are widely prevalent, the Indian manager now going global needs to recognize that managerial beliefs and behaviour in other cultures e.g., in Japan, Germany or the US are likely to be very different from what he or she has experienced in India. Once these differences are understood, the Indian manager can work out ways and means of integrating himself into a hybrid global culture, where the group goals take precedence over individual differences. Many Indian organizations have now started giving their managers specific training in this vital area of cultural integration, before exposing them to the dynamics of the global business environment. This minimizes the cultural shocks, and pre-disposes the Indian manager to expect and manage cultural differences.
64
GOING GLOBAL AND TAKING CHARGE: THE ROAD AHEAD FOR THE INDIAN MANAGER
These dimensions can be summarized as follows: Universalism vs. particularism: This dimension deals with how people look at actions of others. Universalism depends on specific rules and regulations; particularism, on the other hand, relies more on relationships. Individualism vs. communitarianism: This deals with the balance between an individuals interests and the groups interests. Achievement vs. ascription: Is status something that we get through achievements? Or is it something that is given through attributes such as seniority and hierarchy? This is the key question in this dimension. Neutral vs. affective: Neutral cultures avoid open display of emotions, and try to stay focused on the subject at hand whereas affective cultures use gestures and animated conversations. Specific vs. diffuse: People from specific cultures tend to keep business and personal lives separate and distinct. There is very little mixing between the two. Diffuse cultures permit intermingling of the two spheres. Internal vs. external: Internally focused cultures are likely to have a strong belief in their own actions, and are resistant to changes induced by the environment; in contrast, external focus promotes the belief that the environment is the dominant force, thereby encouraging a more ready acceptance of changes and events. Time as sequential vs. time as synchronized: Does one see time as something linear (that is, sequential), where discrete elements follow one after the other? Or is it something where many things happen simultaneously? This will determine whether the culture encourages one thing at a time, or will permit parallel-processing.
This model consists of ten cultural dimensions along which the beliefs and actions of different people or cultures can be mapped. Here is a brief description of each of these ten dimensions: Environment: This dimension deals with how the person relates to the environment in which he operates. Does the person believe that he has reasonable control over the future, or is it all written decided by a higher force? Is harmony important? Is the environment seen to be full of constraints? And so on. Time: Is time seen as something fixed, to be measured and tracked? Is being on time of paramount importance? Or is time something fluid, something secondary to higher priorities like taking care of your relationships? Action: Is the emphasis more on action that leads to measurable results? Or is it on building relationships and caring for one another? Communication: Does the meaning of words depend on the context? Does yes mean yes? Does silence mean something? Are conflicts dealt with through open communication? Or in an indirect fashion? Space: Is space (physical and psychological) seen as public or private? Is the office designed on an open plan, or is it full of cabins and cubicles? Do people stand close to each other while talking? Or at a distance? Power: Is power driven by hierarchy, or is it more decentralized and equal? How are decisions made? By consensus, or by the boss? Individualism: Is a persons identity determined by individual achievements? Or does the groups identity over-ride that of the individual? Is loyalty to the group important? Competitiveness: Is the individual encouraged to take aggressive action on his own? Or is it a co-operative working style that is valued? Is the reward structure designed to emphasise individual achievements? Structure: What is the degree of comfort with change, risk, ambiguity, and uncertainty? Does the culture value predictability and order? Or does it permit some degree of flexibility and chaos? Thinking: What is perceived to be more important
Approach #3: The Cultural Orientations Model from Walker, Walker and Schmitz
Walker, Walker and Schmitz, in their book (2004), Doing Business Internationally, have postulated a Cultural Orientations Model (COM), which is a framework for understanding cultural differences between people from different countries and cultures.
65
The abstract, and the principle? Or large volumes of hard data? Is the approach holistic, or is it tuned to breaking the issue down to small manageable chunks?
BUILDING BRIDGES
As mentioned earlier, these three approaches exhibit a fair degree of commonality in the way they look at cultural differences. These models show that people from different cultures think and act differently while operating on the same dimensione.g., on communication, or time, or status. Once these cultural differences are recognised and understood, the global manager has a greater chance of succeeding in getting a set of people from different cultures to work together reasonably harmoniously. Lack of sensitivity to deep-rooted cultural differences is likely to result in misunderstandings and diversion of energy into negative directions. The key to success in global business lies in building bridges across the cultural gaps, and not seeking to achieve one size fits all homogeneity in the team. The global manager has to collaborate with the team in establishing cultural ground rules for day-to-day work that focus on the common tasks and goals, rather than try to eliminate the individual cultural differences. It is a two-stage process: understanding the differences in culture among team members, and then building bridges across the differences. These bridges can be built on a simple, but powerful principle which is to place the customers needs above individual cultural preferences.
brands that have been acquired are getting careful nourishment for the long run. There have been no abrupt attempts at implementing drastic changes. Overall, as seen from the outside, the philosophy seems to be one of encouraging continuity and growth, while ensuring adherence to the Tata groups core values. In the case of Sundram Fasteners, a trend-setter in the auto component industry in India, the approach has been similar. The UK and German companies that have been acquired in recent years have been allowed to retain and strengthen their brands and identities. Fresh investments in equipment have been made where merited, thereby overturning conventional wisdom that such acquisitions are always followed by loss of jobs and hollowing out of manufacturing assets. There is continuity in senior management staff. Global customers whose needs can be met from Sundram Fasteners multiple manufacturing units in India, Germany, UK, and China are being managed as single accounts globally, through coordinated marketing and sales efforts. Best practices in operational excellence are being transferred from one unit to the other through horizontal deployment, without implications of superiority or inferiority between countries, companies, and cultures. Bharat Forge, with its headquarters in Pune, is another aggressive player in the engineering industry, with the goal of becoming one of the top players in the global automotive forging industry. The company has made a series of acquisitions in Germany, USA, Sweden, and Scotland, and has also formed a JV in China. The company follows a strategy of dual-shoring where its global customers needs can be met from at least two of its plants worldwide. This allows the company to satisfy its customers requirements with fast, possibly local responses, while at the same time meeting the constant demand for more competitive prices.
66
GOING GLOBAL AND TAKING CHARGE: THE ROAD AHEAD FOR THE INDIAN MANAGER
been a relatively recent phenomenon in India, most managers have not had the opportunity to get in-depth exposure to different cultures. Correspondingly, the manager from the other culture (say, from Europe or the US or elsewhere) also has had no opportunity to observe and understand how the Indian mind works. This results in a gap, which needs conscious effort from both sides to bridge. The following caselet will make this point clear.
was focussed only on the output, i.e., the date of completion. To the Indian, saying no or may be meant an admission of lack of capability and a perceived loss of face; to the German, receiving a no for an answer would have been equally acceptable, and more professional. He would have found another source for the product, and got on with his life. Ultimately, the two sides evolved a working method for future instances, by which they agreed to discuss the risks and assumptions explicitly before the start of any new project so that the ambiguity was sharply reduced, and everyone was on the same page. The commitment to be made to the end customer was agreed to be held sacrosanct. Learning from such examples, Indian MNCs can proactively implement cultural sensitization programmes at both ends of the ocean, so that such gaps and problems are minimised, if not avoided altogether. Many specialist organisations, which offer expert training in this relatively new and fuzzy area, have come into existence in recent times. Given that the financial logic for many M&A decisions is based heavily on achieving significant synergies in a short period of time, such training should become a mandatory part of the corporate M&A playbook.
CONCLUSION
As more and more Indian MNCs go global, their managers would need to gear up, in a very short time, the knowledge base needed to face the new challenges they would inevitably face in multiple global markets. Indian MNCs are beginning to show that they are second to none in coming up with aggressive growth strategies which involve putting down roots for the long term in many countries around the world. But the success of these strategies would depend on the ability of their managers to understand the dominance of the customer and the importance of the brand. Additionally, Indian managers should develop a global mindset that would enable them to understand and manage cultural differences, and lead their multinational teams to success. Ultimately, business people from different cultures need to work together in an atmosphere of mutual respect and trust. This is where the cultural integration models, and the need for a global mindset, come in as essentials.
67
Achal Raghavan is a strategy and business excellence consultant based in Bangalore. Till recently, he was HeadInternational Operations at Sundram Fasteners Limited. A graduate of the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Madras and the Indian Institute of Management (IIM) Ahmedabad, Raghavan brings with him over 33 years of work experience in the automotive and engineering industries. During this period, he has
held Board-level positions for 10 years in organizations such as Delphi Automotive Systems, India and Ingersoll-Rand (India) Limited. He teaches as guest faculty at IIM Ahmedabad and IIM Bangalore, and also writes for management journals and business newspapers. e-mail: achalraghavan@yahoo.co.in
We must ensure that the global market is embedded in broadly shared values and practices that reflect global social needs, and that all the worlds people share the benefits of globalization. Kofi Annan
68
GOING GLOBAL AND TAKING CHARGE: THE ROAD AHEAD FOR THE INDIAN MANAGER