Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG-AJW Document 514-3 Filed 05/07/12 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #:13386

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Marc Steven Colen, sbn 108275 Law Offices of Marc Steven Colen 5737 Kanan Road, Ste. 347 Agoura Hills, CA 91301 Tele: 818.716.2891 Attorney for Defendants Todd Sankey and The Sankey Firm, Inc.,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION

) ( Lisa Liberi, et al., ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) Orly Taitz, et al., ) ) Defendants ) ) __________________________ )

Case No.: 8:11-cv-00485 AG (AJWx) Hon. Andrew Guilford Courtroom 10D DEFENDANTS TODD SANKEY AND THE SANKEY FIRMS OBJECTIONS TO DECLARATIONS Date Action Filed: Trial Date: Hearing Date: May 4, 2009 June 5, 2012 May 21, 2012

Liberi v. Taitz Case No.: 8:11-cv-00485 AG Response to Paintiffs Statement of Facts pg. 1

Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG-AJW Document 514-3 Filed 05/07/12 Page 2 of 9 Page ID #:13387

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

PELIMINARY STATEMENT A Separate Statement of Uncontroverted Facts requires that the proposed uncontroverted facts be separately delineated so that a full and proper response be made. Instead, Plaintiffs provide a litany of compound colloquies each of which contains a multitude of allegations, assumptions that may be proposed facts but are not separately identified as such. This issue may have been obviated to some degree by quoting verbatim the particular admission or other evidence on which they rely. Because of the mess that Plaintiffs have created and submitted, it is not possible to respond to what should have been an easy task except to either admit or deny and that is what Todd Sankey and the Sankey Firm, Inc. will do. It must be further noted that Plaintiffs Statement relies on the Plaintiffs own inadmissible, irrelevant, baseless and conclusory allegations, opinions, including unsubstantiated legal and medical opinions, conjecture, allegations by the Plaintiffs themselves and the inadvertent Admissions by the Sankey Defendants. As to the last, it is certainly reasonable that the Plaintiffs so rely but if the Motion to Withdraw Admissions is granted then there is no supportive evidence for the colloquies provided. Once that occurs the untrue admissions will be reduced to the truth and the Plaintiffs will have to try the case on its merits. In addition, the Plaintiffs have improperly objected to every discovery request, even refusing to provide a single document that supports any of the allegations of the First Amended Complaint. Not a single document. Until Plaintiffs are forced by an order to be derived from Todd Sankeys several

Liberi v. Taitz Case No.: 8:11-cv-00485 AG Response to Paintiffs Statement of Facts pg. 2

Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG-AJW Document 514-3 Filed 05/07/12 Page 3 of 9 Page ID #:13388

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

motions to compel pending, it is impossible to adequately respond at this point. Lastly, evidence may not exist that proves a negative. In view of all of the above, Todd Sankey and The Sankey Firm, Inc. submits the Declaration of Todd Sankey previously filed which states the truth rather than untrue Admissions. This Introductory Statement is applicable to all of the following responses and incorporated by this reference. Responses to Assertedly Uncontroverted Facts No. 1 Todd Sankey and The Sankey Firm, Inc. first state that anything done by anyone other then themselves is irrelevant; they have no connection with nor responsibility for any other persons. Todd Sankey and The Sankey Firm, Inc. did not even know that Plaintiffs existed prior to the being served with the Complaint. Statements of what the Plaintiffs believed, knew or trusted is inadmissible. As to Todd Sankey and The Sankey Firm, Inc., this colloquy is denied. The evidence is the Declaration of Todd Sankey. No. 2 Todd Sankey and The Sankey Firm, Inc. state that they have no knowledge of the actions of anyone else and they have no connection with nor responsibility for any other persons. Todd Sankey and The Sankey Firm, Inc. did not even know that Plaintiffs existed prior to the being served with the Complaint.
Liberi v. Taitz Case No.: 8:11-cv-00485 AG Response to Paintiffs Statement of Facts pg. 3

Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG-AJW Document 514-3 Filed 05/07/12 Page 4 of 9 Page ID #:13389

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Further, this statement is irrelevant as to anyone other than the Plaintiffs. As to themselves, the statement is denied. The evidence is the Declaration of Todd Sankey. No. 3 This statement is unintelligible. NS and TSFI are not identified and no response may be made. No. 4 This statement is unintelligible. NS and TSFI are not identified and no response may be made. No. 5 This statement is unintelligible. NS and TSFI are not identified and no response may be made. No. 6 This statement is unintelligible. TSFI is not identified and no response may be made. No. 7

Liberi v. Taitz Case No.: 8:11-cv-00485 AG Response to Paintiffs Statement of Facts pg. 4

Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG-AJW Document 514-3 Filed 05/07/12 Page 5 of 9 Page ID #:13390

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

This statement is unintelligible. NS, TS and TSFI are not identified and no response may be made. No. 8 Todd Sankey and The Sankey Firm, Inc. had no connection with anything to do with the Plaintiffs and did not even know that Plaintiffs existed prior to the being served with the Complaint. As to Todd Sankey and The Sankey Firm, Inc., this colloquy is denied. The evidence is the Declaration of Todd Sankey. No. 9 This statement is unintelligible. TSFI is not identified and no response may be made. No. 10 This statement is unintelligible. NS, TS and TSFI are not identified and no response may be made. No. 11 Neither Todd Sankey nor The Sankey Firm, Inc. had no interest in anything to do with the Plaintiffs and did nothing that involved or concerned the Plaintiffs. The Sankey Defendants did not have any knowledge that the

Liberi v. Taitz Case No.: 8:11-cv-00485 AG Response to Paintiffs Statement of Facts pg. 5

Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG-AJW Document 514-3 Filed 05/07/12 Page 6 of 9 Page ID #:13391

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Plaintiffs existed prior to the being served with the Complaint. On those bases, this statement is denied. The evidence is the Declaration of Todd Sankey. No. 12 Todd Sankey and The Sankey Firm, Inc. had no interest in anything to do with the Plaintiffs and did nothing that involved or concerned the Plaintiffs. The Sankey Defendants did not have any knowledge that the Plaintiffs existed prior to the being served with the Complaint. On those bases, this statement is denied. The evidence is the Declaration of Todd Sankey. No. 13 Neither Todd Sankey nor the Sankey Firm Defendants had no interest in anything to do with the Plaintiffs and did nothing that involved or concerned the Plaintiffs. The Sankey Defendants did not have any knowledge that the Plaintiffs existed prior to the being served with the Complaint. On those bases, this statement is denied. The evidence is the Declaration of Todd Sankey. No. 14

Liberi v. Taitz Case No.: 8:11-cv-00485 AG Response to Paintiffs Statement of Facts pg. 6

Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG-AJW Document 514-3 Filed 05/07/12 Page 7 of 9 Page ID #:13392

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

This statement is unintelligible. NS, TS and TSFI are not identified and no response may be made. No. 15 This statement is unintelligible. NS, TS and TSFI are not identified and no response may be made. No. 16 This statement is unintelligible. NS, TS and TSFI are not identified and no response may be made. No. 17 This statement is unintelligible. NS, TS and TSFI are not identified and no response may be made. No. 18 This statement is unintelligible. NS, TS and TSFI are not identified and no response may be made. No. 19 This statement is unintelligible. NS is not identified and no response may be made. No. 20
Liberi v. Taitz Case No.: 8:11-cv-00485 AG Response to Paintiffs Statement of Facts pg. 7

Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG-AJW Document 514-3 Filed 05/07/12 Page 8 of 9 Page ID #:13393

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 This statement is unintelligible. NS, TS and TSFI are not identified and no response may be made.
Liberi v. Taitz Case No.: 8:11-cv-00485 AG Response to Paintiffs Statement of Facts pg. 8

This statement is unintelligible. TS and TSFI are not identified and no response may be made. No. 21 This statement is unintelligible. TS and TSFI are not identified and no response may be made. No. 22 This statement is unintelligible. NS, TS and TSFI are not identified and no response may be made. No. 23 Neither Todd Sankey nor The Sankey Firm had no interest in anything to do with the Plaintiffs or Taitz and did nothing that involved or concerned the Plaintiffs. The Sankey Defendants did not have any knowledge that Taitz and the Plaintiffs existed prior to the being served with the Complaint. On those bases, this statement is denied. The evidence is the Declaration of Todd Sankey. No. 24

Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG-AJW Document 514-3 Filed 05/07/12 Page 9 of 9 Page ID #:13394

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

No. 25 Neither Todd Sankey not the Sankey Firm, Inc. is an attorney, but they believe that no requirement exists that a private investigator must verify that a client has a permissible purpose or legal entitlement nor that they need permissible purpose or legal entitlement to do their jobs. The definition of publish is vague and ambiguous and no further response may be made in that regard. The evidence is the Declaration of Todd Sankey.

Respectfully submitted on this 7th day of May 2012 by

Marc Steven Colen

_____________________________ Marc Steven Colen The Colen Law Firm Attorney for Defendants Todd Sankey and The Sankey Firm, Inc.

Liberi v. Taitz Case No.: 8:11-cv-00485 AG Response to Paintiffs Statement of Facts pg. 9