Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Problem 1 (4.6 Luke Vercimak) The this is a known signal in WGN. Per eq 4.3, the test statistic will be: T (x) = In this case (s[n] = Ar n ): E= For 0 < r < 1: = A2
N 1 n=0 N 1 n=0
x[n]s[n] >
s2 [n] = A2
N 1 n=0
r 2n
N 1 n=0
r 2n
A2 as N 1 r2
Therefore as we gain additional samples, the detector performance will approach a constant. (obtained by plugging E into 4.14). For r = 1: = A2
N 1 n=0
r 2n = N A2 as N
r 2n as N
Per Eq 4.14, PD will approach 1 as N For all cases, the detector threshold can be determined by plugging E into: = 2 EQ1 (PF A )
V T CV = V T = V 1 C = V V 1 = V V T C 1 = V 1 V T C 1 = D T D D = 1 V T First, we need to calculate the eigenvalues of C. det(I C) = 0, it is easy to get = 1 . Then it is easy to nd the matrix of eigenvectors. VT =V =
1 2 1 2 1 1+ 1 2 1 2
1 =
0
1 1
D=
1 2(1+) 1 2(1)
1 2(1+) 1 2(1)
Problem 3 (4.19 Siyao Gu) Since s0 [0] = s1 [0] = 1, we can concentrate planning the decision regions around s0 [1] and s1 [1]. The test can be simplied to T The NP test becomes p(x; H1 ) H0 P (H0 ) = p(x; H0 ) H1 P (H1 p(x; H1 ) = p(x; H0 )
1 2 1 2
N (1, 2 ) N (1, 2 )
under H0 under H1
(1)
(2)
(x2 [1] 2x[1] + 1) (x2 [1] + 2x[1] + 1) 2 2 H0 P (H0 ) p(x; H1 ) = exp[2x[1]] p(x; H0 ) H1 P (H1 ) = exp 2
x[1]
H0 H1
1 P (H0 ) ln 2 P (H1 )
(6)
Thus the line running through x[1] and perpendicular to the line running between s0 and s1 is the chosen decision boundary. This would be a 0-slope line. If P (H0 ) = P (H1 ), the boundary would be x[1] = 0. Problem 4 (4.24 Shu Wang) N 1 According to the text book, we have Ti (x) = n=0 x[n]si [n] 1 i . We need to choose Hi to make 2 Ti (x) to be the maximum statistic. The block diagram of the optimal receiver is on page 120, gure 4.13. When M = 2, according to eq 4.25, we have: (1 s ) ) 2 2
Pe = Q(
s =