Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Page 1 of 3
Skype connects home and work devices While Steve Ballmer did not focus on making Skype an enterprise solution, he alluded to a future in which Skype would work alongside enterprise solutions including Lync and Outlook/Exchange. He talked about using the Skype and Microsoft solutions to connect your life enabling users to use a combination of home and work devices. Specifically, Microsoft detailed supporting: Continuing Skype availability on non-Microsoft clients Microsoft devices, including Xbox, Xbox Live, Kinect, and Windows Phone Enhancing Skype by connecting to Lync, Outlook, and other business products
Fig 1. Microsofts view of where Skype fits into the consumer and enterprise communications architecture
Page 2 of 3
Three disparate products complicates Microsofts video offering Microsoft developed 1) Lync RTV desktop video, 2) partnered with Polycom for video, and now 3) acquired Skype with its proprietary video technology. Three platforms will create compatibility issues with endpoints and video transcoding. The acquisition will likely impact the Polycom partnership. In addition, it becomes more complicated for Microsoft customers to plan a Unified video solution for their organizations. Key question for the customer: It took Polycom five years to develop integration with Microsofts proprietary RTvideo codec, how long are you willing to wait for Microsoft to deliver Skype as an integrated video solution? Skype is not an enterprise-class solution. Period. Skypes current offering and track record does not meet the levels of reliability and security required of enterprise-class voice and video solutions. In December of 2010, a massive outage impacted at least 20% of Skypes users for more than a full day. This was only one of many well-documented outages. It is not clear if Microsofts SaaS solution is capable of providing enterprise grade service. During the week of Skypes acquisition, there were multiple significant BPOS outages. Without a deterministic enterprise-grade architecture with QoS, SLAs, and high availability in place, Skype is currently not viewed as reliable enough for enterprise customers. Many analyst reports have stated that Skype falls short of delivering specific enterprise-class UC capabilities (e.g. E-911). From a security perspective, enterprises using Skypes peer-to-peer architecture wont know exactly what type of information is traveling across their networks. In addition, reports have been published documenting information leakage that occurs regardless of the encryption methods implemented. Finally, the Skype application has been subject to numerous exploits that have allowed hackers to compromise end-user systems. Key question for the customer: Are you willing to risk your business on a communication architecture with historical issues around quality, security, and availability? Microsoft raises the bar for competing with its own SP partners Many Service Providers (SPs) communicated frustration that Microsofts direct offering of BPOS and now Office 365 services actually compete with the SPs efforts to sell the same solutions. For example, a major North American SP stated that they have no intentions of increasing efforts around Office 365 or any new solutions that may result from the Skype acquisition. By acquiring Skype, Microsoft instantly became the largest international voice service provider worldwide, which will inevitably increase competitive tensions between Microsoft and its own base of SP partners. The acquisition can be viewed as anti-Service Provider. Skype will compete for traditional voice minutes rather than replace call control systems or existing PBXs. SPs may even be encouraged to implement new broadband and mobile charges or even pay per bit models. There is an opportunity here for competitors to align their interests and challenge jointly with Microsoft and Skype. Key questions for the service provider: Does it make sense to align you business strategy with a vendor who invested $8.5 billion in a platform that directly competes with your business? Additional References Selling Competitively on IWE http://iwe.cisco.com/html/index.jsp#url=/web/competitive/Microsoft Microsoft Competitive Site http://wwwin.cisco.com/competitive/
Page 3 of 3