Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
STRUCTURES
MENGMENG DONG 324294
5/24/2011
Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 2
CONCLUSION ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 32
Introduction
Project 1 is about design a high-rise office building by analysis the core and floor system, lateral load distribution, wind and seismic load to determine how the
tall building behaviors under each cases.(e.g. the deflection of typical members, the force carried out by six different cells, the overturning bending moment
under wind and seismic load)
The perimeter of the building is as defined by floor system developed for Part A of this project. The floors crossing section of the tall building is 42*42m which
has a 19*19m core areas and has 42 floors in total. Project B is only consider one load condition being the wind from the south and the wind load for each of the
orthogonal directions can be based on the project area of building on to a surface perpendicular to the wind direction. For this load case determine manually the
percentage of wind load resisted by each of six core cells by hand calibration.
Part C is determine the lateral along-wind loads for the north south direction only up to the height of the building by using dynamic method and finds the baseoverturning moment. In addition, also determine the lateral north south design earthquake load up the height of building and compare which of the two loads is
dictates.
Part D is about developing a simple SpaceGass model using a column element for the two conditions. Carry out a lateral load analysis for the north south
direction with the appropriate eccentricity by applying the derived along-wind case from the Part C. First model will have just six column elements going up the
height of the building. The second model will have six columns linked by header beams. By using SpaceGass to analysis how the building behaviors under two
different models e.g. deflection at the top of the building and the forces at the base of the building.
Step 1: Find the Centroid of cells 1-6 and the second moment of area Ixx and Iyy about the centroidal axis
The core layout is given below in Figure 1
A(m2)
3.200
1.040
2.400
0.780
7.420
Note: xi and yi is the center of each segment
Segment
1
2
3
4
b(m)
0.400
2.600
0.300
2.600
d(m)
8.000
0.400
8.000
0.300
xi(m)
0.200
1.700
3.150
1.700
xiA(m3)
0.640
1.768
7.560
1.326
11.294
yiA(m3)
12.800
8.164
9.600
0.156
30.720
-xi is the x-axis distance between centroid of cell 1 and center point of the segment 1
While -yi is the y-axis distance between centroid of cell 1 and center point of the segment 1
Second moment of area Ixx and Iyy are calculated using formulas below:
Ixx =
Iyy =
Iyy =
yi(m)
4.000
7.850
4.000
0.200
Hence
-xi(m)
1.322
-0.178
-1.628
-0.178
-yi(m) Ixx(m4)
0.140
-3.710
0.140
3.940
Iyy(m4)
17.130
14.327
12.847
12.115
5.636
0.619
6.378
0.464
m4
Similar to cell 1 calculation, the centroid and Ixx and Iyy about the centroidal axis of cell 2 to cell 6s calculation is showing below.
b(m)
0.300
6.200
0.300
6.200
0.150
d(m)
8.000
0.400
8.000
0.300
7.300
A(m2)
2.400
2.480
2.400
1.860
1.095
10.235
xi(m)
6.250
9.500
12.750
9.500
9.500
m4
m4
yi(m)
4.000
7.850
4.000
0.200
4.050
xiA(m3)
15.000
23.560
30.600
17.670
10.403
97.233
yiA(m3)
9.600
19.468
9.600
0.372
4.435
43.475
-xi(m)
-3.250
0.000
3.250
0.000
0.000
-yi(m) Ixx(m4)
Iyy(m4)
-0.248
12.800
25.368
3.602
32.216
7.944
-0.248
12.800
25.368
-4.048
30.487
5.958
-0.198
4.863
0.002
93.166
64.641
b(m)
0.300
2.600
0.400
2.600
d(m)
8.000
0.300
8.000
0.400
A(m2)
2.400
0.780
3.200
1.040
7.420
xi(m)
15.850
17.300
18.800
17.300
yi(m)
4.000
7.850
4.000
0.200
xiA(m3)
38.040
13.494
60.160
17.992
129.686
56.344m4
13.097m4
yiA(m3)
9.600
6.123
12.800
0.208
28.731
-xi(m)
-1.628
-0.178
1.322
-0.178
-yi(m) Ixx(m4)
Iyy(m4)
0.128
12.839
6.378
3.978
12.348
0.464
0.128
17.119
5.636
-3.672
14.038
0.619
56.344
13.097
b(m)
0.400
2.600
0.300
2.600
d(m)
8.000
0.400
8.000
0.300
A(m2)
3.200
1.040
2.400
0.780
7.420
xi(m)
0.200
1.700
3.150
1.700
56.344m4
13.097m4
yi(m)
15.000
18.800
15.000
11.150
xiA(m3)
0.640
1.768
7.560
1.326
11.294
yiA(m3)
48.000
19.552
36.000
8.697
112.249
-xi(m)
1.322
-0.178
-1.628
-0.178
-yi(m)
Ixx(m4)
0.128
-3.672
0.128
3.978
Iyy(m4)
17.119
14.038
12.839
12.348
56.344
5.636
0.619
6.378
0.464
13.097
Segment
1
2
3
4
5
b(m)
0.300
6.200
0.300
6.200
0.150
d(m)
8.000
0.400
8.000
0.300
7.300
A(m2)
2.400
2.480
2.400
1.860
1.095
10.235
xi(m)
6.250
9.500
12.750
9.500
9.500
93.116m4
64.641m4
yi(m)
15.000
18.800
15.000
11.150
14.950
xiA(m3)
15.000
23.560
30.600
17.670
10.403
97.233
yiA(m3)
36.000
46.624
36.000
20.739
16.370
155.733
-xi(m)
3.250
0.000
-3.250
0.000
0.000
-yi(m) Ixx(m4)
Iyy(m4)
0.216
12.800
25.368
-3.584
31.893
7.944
0.216
12.800
25.368
4.066
30.760
5.958
0.266
4.863
0.002
93.116
64.641
b(m)
0.300
2.600
0.400
2.600
d(m)
8.000
0.300
8.000
0.400
A(m2)
2.400
0.780
3.200
1.040
7.420
xi(m)
15.850
17.300
18.800
17.300
yi(m)
15.000
18.800
15.000
11.150
xiA(m3)
38.040
13.494
60.160
17.992
129.686
yiA(m3)
36.000
14.664
48.000
11.596
110.260
56.419m4
13.097m4
-xi(m)
1.628
0.178
-1.322
0.178
-yi(m) Ixx(m4)
Iyy(m4)
-0.140
12.847
-3.940
12.115
-0.140
17.130
3.710
14.327
56.419
6.378
0.464
5.636
0.619
13.097
Note: 1.Element stiffness is proportional to the second moment of area if the elements that is found the first step:
, where E is the modulus of elasticity and H, which represents the height of the building are constant for all elements.
2. Kxxj and Kyyj is the lateral stiffness of each core in the x and y direction respectively. Ixxi and Iyyj can be used as K is proportional to I.
Hence,
9.5m
Look at Figure 1 that given core and arrangement and sizing of cells, all dimensions and sizes are symmetrical about two axes. Consequently, the center of
stiffness of the core will be around the geometrical center of the core. The center stiffness of the core calculated above (9.5, 9.665) is really close to the
geometrical center of the core (9.5, 9.5).
10
Step 3: find the center of area of the wall perpendicular to the N-S wind.
For this project consider the load wind from the south only. The point of application of the load shall be offset from the centroid of the projected surface by 5%. This refers to the
projected surface which designed in Part A.
Step 4: find the element forces in the north direction by using the equation
Kxxj and Kyyj is the lateral stiffness of ach core in the x and y direction which can be taken as Ixxj and Iyyj
eccentricity ex is the distance from the center of stiffness to the load applied which equal 2.075m
xj and yj are the distance in the x and y direction, respectively, from the center of stiffness and the centroid of each core
In this case, Vy can be assumed to be 1, given that the proportion of the load distributed by each is element is to be calculated
The first term of the equation represents the translational force and the second term is the rotational force due to the eccentricity of the load
Table below sum up all the values need to calculate the Fyj
Cell
1
2
3
4
5
6
Centroid X
(m)
1.522
9.500
17.478
1.522
9.500
17.478
Centroid Y
(m)
4.140
4.248
3.872
15.128
15.216
14.860
xj=
(m)
7.978
0.000
-7.978
7.978
0.000
-7.978
yj=
(m)
5.525
5.417
5.793
-5.463
-5.551
-5.195
Ixxj=Kxxj
(m4)
56.419
93.166
56.344
56.344
93.116
56.419
411.809
Iyyj=Kyyj
(m4)
13.097
64.641
13.097
13.097
64.641
13.097
181.669
11
Kxxj*xj2
Kyyj*yj2
Fyj(%)
3590.905
0.000
3586.128
3586.128
0.000
3590.905
399.758
1896.967
439.491
390.876
1991.712
353.458
18.4
22.6
9.00
18.4
22.6
9.00
14354.067
5472.263
100
Location and Terrain: Terrain category 3 zone with no shielding in Melbourne (Region A5)
Topography: assume ground to be flat
Dimensions: Average roof height 168m (Number of floors=42 and height of each floor is 4m)
Horizontal directions: 42m*42m square section
Building orientation: Major axis North-South
In order to calculate the wind load, calculate the wind pressure according to AS1170.2, Cl.2.4.1 as follows:
2.4.1 Design wind pressure
12
Note: The orientation of the building major axis is specified for this project:
North-South Direction
13
Cl. 3.2
According to the Building Code of Australia (BCA), the structure should be treated as Level 3. Hence take average recurrence interval, R, for loading and overall
structural response equal to 1000 years.
Note: -V1000 is a common return period for buildings
-1000 year return period: 1/1000 probabilities that the wind speed is exceeded
From Table 3.1 in AS/NZS1170.2, V1000 = 46 m/s (Region A)
Wind direction multiplier (Md)
Cl. 3.3
Cl. 4.2
Terrain category is Category 3; this corresponds to Cl. 4.2.1(c). This actual value of Mz,cat is obtained from Table 4.1(A):
Cl. 4.3
Shielding may be provided by upwind buildings or other surrounding structures. In this exercise, there are no other buildings of greater height in any direction
therefore, the shielding multiplier is taken as 1.
Ms = 1.0
Topography multiplier (Mt)
Where
H= height of the hill, ridge or escarpment
Lu= horizontal distance upwind from the crest of the hill, ridge or escarpment to a level half the height below the crest
Ground is flat, hence H/ (2Lu) =0
Mh =1.0
Topography multiplier (Mlee)
The lee (effect) multiplier (Mlee) shall be evaluated for New Zealand sites in the lee zones. For all other sites, the lee multiplier shall be 1.0.
Mlee =1.0
Hence, Mt =1.0
Cl. 5.2(1)
Cl. 5.2(2)
Cl. 5.5
Where:
Cp, e= external pressure coefficient
Cp, i= internal pressure coefficient
Ka= area reduction factor
Kc, e= combination factor applied to external pressures
Kc, i= combination factor applied to internal pressures
Kl= local pressure factor
Kp= porous cladding reduction factor
Table. 5.1(A)
16
Note: When calculating the base overturning moments Cp,i will cancel out as the above Figure points out. Cp,i is a useful parameter when estimating the external
pressure on the surfaces.
Combination factor applied to external and internal pressure (Kc,e and Kc,i)
Kc,e = 0.9
Kc,i = 1.0
Cfig,i= Cp,iKc,i=0*1 = 0 OR Cfig,i= -0.2*1 = -0.2
Aerodynamic shape factors for external pressure (Cfig,e )
Table. 5.(A)
Cp,e=0.8
Cp, e =-0.5
Cp, e =-0.65
Note: when calculating the along wind base overturning moment, the forces on the side walls are not included.
18
Cp, e =-1.3
Note: When calculating the along wind base overturning moment, the forces on the roofs are not included.
Area reduction factor for roofs and side walls (Ka)
Cl. 5.4.2
Ka = 0.8
Local pressure factor for cladding (Kl)
Cl. 5.4.4
The local pressure factor (Kl) shall be taken as 1.0 in all cases except when determining the wind forces applied to cladding, their fixings, the members that
directly support the cladding, and the immediate fixings of these members.
Kl = 1.0
19
The permeable cladding reduction factor (Kp) shall be taken as 1.0 except that where an external surface consists of permeable cladding
Kp = 1.0
Windward wall Cfig,e = 0.8*0.8*0.9*1.0*1.0 = 0.576
Leeward wall Cfig,e = -0.5*0.8*0.9*1.0*1.0 = -0.36
Note: Cfig,e and Cfig,e are parameters used to calculate the pressure at different levels on the Windward and the leeward walls
Cl. 6.2.2
Turbulence intensity z=h, Ih = 0.1134 (Table 6.1 by interpolation)
Background factor,
(Equation 6.2(2))
Hs =1.0
na = 46 / H =46/168 =0.27
20
][
For b=42m
[
][
][
Reduced frequency,
Cl. 6.2.2
For b=42m
Mz,cat 3
Vdes,(m/s)
Windward Leeward
qz*Cfig(kPa) qh*cfig (kPa)
21
Windward
Leedward
Moment
qz*Cfig*Cdyn*A(kN) qz*Cfig*Cdyn*A(kN) Contribution (MNm)
56.102
55.991
55.881
55.770
55.660
55.476
55.292
55.108
54.924
54.740
54.556
54.372
54.188
54.004
53.820
53.636
53.452
53.213
52.918
52.624
52.330
52.035
51.741
49.588
49.588
50.692
50.324
49.956
49.588
49.220
48.668
48.116
1.071
1.067
1.062
1.058
1.054
1.047
1.040
1.033
1.026
1.019
1.013
1.006
0.999
0.992
0.985
0.979
0.972
0.963
0.953
0.942
0.932
0.921
0.911
0.837
0.837
0.874
0.862
0.849
0.837
0.824
0.806
0.788
-0.680
-0.680
-0.680
-0.680
-0.680
-0.680
-0.680
-0.680
-0.680
-0.680
-0.680
-0.680
-0.680
-0.680
-0.680
-0.680
-0.680
-0.680
-0.680
-0.680
-0.680
-0.680
-0.680
-0.680
-0.680
-0.680
-0.680
-0.680
-0.680
-0.680
-0.680
-0.680
22
172.869
172.189
171.511
170.834
170.158
169.035
167.916
166.800
165.688
164.580
163.475
162.374
161.277
160.184
159.094
158.008
156.926
155.525
153.809
152.102
150.405
148.717
147.039
135.058
135.058
141.139
139.097
137.070
135.058
133.061
130.093
127.159
-109.758
-109.758
-109.758
-109.758
-109.758
-109.758
-109.758
-109.758
-109.758
-109.758
-109.758
-109.758
-109.758
-109.758
-109.758
-109.758
-109.758
-109.758
-109.758
-109.758
-109.758
-109.758
-109.758
-109.758
-109.758
-109.758
-109.758
-109.758
-109.758
-109.758
-109.758
-109.758
47.472
46.736
46.000
44.896
43.792
42.320
40.388
38.180
38.180
38.180
0.767
0.743
0.720
0.686
0.652
0.609
0.555
0.496
0.496
0.496
-0.680
-0.680
-0.680
-0.680
-0.680
-0.680
-0.680
-0.680
-0.680
-0.680
Note:
qz=0.6* Vdes,2
A = 42 * 4 = 168m2
Totoal along-wind base bending moment = 938.370 MNm for a 168m tall building
Design the earthquake load for a tall building in Melbourne area (AS1170.4)
Find Base shear
C = 0.88ZS/T2.94Z
Table 3.1
123.778
119.969
116.220
110.709
105.331
98.369
89.593
80.064
80.064
80.064
-109.758
-109.758
-109.758
-109.758
-109.758
-109.758
-109.758
-109.758
-109.758
-109.758
938.370
C = 1.32ZS/T2
Table 3.2
as T>1.5 sec
=1.32*0.08*1.0/2.9162
=0.0124
Vertival distribution of VB
the building will be divided into 42 nodes according to the number of floors auusing uniform distribution of mass
24
Calculationd were carried out by spreadsheet. Summaries of the results are given in the table following tables.
Stastic Analysis
Nodes
mi(kg)
0
1618.349
1
2157.798
2
2157.798
3
2157.798
4
2157.798
5
2157.798
6
2157.798
7
2157.798
8
2157.798
9
2157.798
10
2157.798
11
2157.798
12
2157.798
13
2157.798
14
2157.798
15
3056.881
16
2157.798
17
2157.798
18
2157.798
19
2157.798
20
2157.798
21
2157.798
22
2157.798
23
2157.798
24
2157.798
25
2157.798
hi(m)
168
164
160
156
152
148
144
140
136
132
128
124
120
116
112
108
104
100
96
92
88
84
80
76
72
68
mihi2(kgm2)
45676271.560
58036139.450
55239633.028
52512176.147
49853768.807
47264411.009
44744102.752
42292844.037
39910634.862
37597475.229
35353365.138
33178304.587
31072293.578
29035332.110
27067420.183
35655456.881
23338744.954
21577981.651
19886267.890
18263603.670
16709988.991
15225423.853
13809908.257
12463442.202
11186025.688
9977658.716
Fi (kN)
179.758
228.400
217.394
206.660
196.198
186.008
176.089
166.442
157.067
147.964
139.132
130.572
122.284
114.268
106.523
140.321
91.849
84.920
78.262
71.876
65.762
59.919
54.349
49.050
44.022
39.267
25
Bending moment(MNm)
30.199
37.458
34.783
32.239
29.822
27.529
25.357
23.302
21.361
19.531
17.809
16.191
14.674
13.255
11.931
15.155
9.552
8.492
7.513
6.613
5.787
5.033
4.348
3.728
3.170
2.670
8838341.284
7768073.394
6766855.046
5834686.239
7043053.211
4177497.248
3452477.064
2796506.422
2209585.321
1691713.761
1242891.743
863119.266
552396.330
310722.936
195640.367
34524.771
0.000
880706759.633
34.783
30.571
26.631
22.962
27.718
16.440
13.587
11.006
8.696
6.658
4.891
3.397
2.174
1.223
0.770
0.136
0.000
2.226
1.834
1.491
1.194
1.330
0.723
0.543
0.396
0.278
0.186
0.117
0.068
0.035
0.015
0.006
0.001
0.000
437.947
Note:
The total base overturning moment for earthquke load =437.947 MNm for a 168m tall building.
Note:
The total base overturning moment for earthquke load =437.947 MNm while the totoal along-wind base bending moment = 938.370MNm for a 168m tall
building. The along-wind base bending moment is obviously two times larger than the overturning moment. Hence the along-wind loads is dicates.
26
27
Result
The deflection at the top of the building is 850mm and 300mm respectively to Model A and Model B. Its obviously that Model B gives a much smaller deflection
compare to Model A. Model A just thin slab acting between walls and due to the slim nature of the slab, there will be a low flexural stiffness, the extend of
coupling action is limiting. However in Model B by introducing beams between the cantilever elements this flexural stiffness can be greatly enhanced hence
increasing the coupling action and hence improving the overall lateral resistance. Figure 10 graphically explain the above reason behind the header beam
function.
Note: the deflection at the top of the building is hand calculated by using the formulas below:
Where W is the force action on the top of the building, l is the height of the building, E is Youngs Modulus of the concrete.
28
Model A
XAxis
Force
Y-Axis
Force
(kN)
(kN)
Z-Axis
Force
X-Axis
Moment
Y-Axis
Moment
Z-Axis
Moment
Column
2
3
4
5
6
7
Load
Total Reaction
117.2
556.0
128.1
-117.2
-556.0
-128.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
(kN)
(kNm)
(kNm)
(kNm)
1133.9
171879.6
-22.6
-7625.9
3015.3
212736.2
-23.3
-39330.5
2495.5
85000.6
-22.6
-8604.5
1133.9
171879.6
-22.6
7625.9
3015.3
212736.2
-23.3
39330.5
2495.5
85000.6
-22.6
8604.5
-13289.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
13289.4
939232.7
-137.1
0.0
18.3
22.65
9.05
18.3
22.65
9.05
18.4
22.6
9
18.4
22.6
9
100
100
Note:
The sum of overturning base moment in Model A is 939.2327MNm while the sum of overturning base moment finds in Part C is equal to
938.370MNm. Those two values are quite similar (almost the same).
For the total base moment action on each column the percentages are also close to the Force percentages which find in Part B of the
Project.
From above statement, its can see the Model A is analysis is quite successful.
The moments for X and Y direction in Model B for each of the six columns are tabulate in the Table below.
29
Coupling
forces
Moment
(kNm)
97917.05
119882.2
47899.96
97917.05
119882.2
47899.96
0.0
529281.330
43.66
Note:
Due to header beams at Model B, the coupling effect will decrease the overturning moment at the base but activate the push and
pull action on the cores.
So in the Table above seeing decreasing values of overall moment compare to Model A, but there are values in forces in y-direction
compare to Model A.
The base moment and coupling forces percentages are all in term the total overturning moment. The core moment takes
approximately 43.66% of the overturning moment while the coupling forces takes about 56.34% of the overturning moment.
By add the sum of overturning moment to the moment due to these coupling forces, get the sum of overturning moment that is
equal 937.370MNm which is approximately equal to the overturning moment in part C (938.370MNm)
In additional, depends entirely on the number of header beams that chose, the more header beams, the greater the coupling action.
Because for Model B assumes that every floor has header beams, therefore, the percentages of the core moment are smaller than
the percentages of the coupling forces.
30
Conclusion
Finding in Part B:
The percentages of wind load resisted by six core cells in Part B is respectively to 18.4, 22.6, 9, 18.4, 22.6, and 9
Findng in Part C:
The total base overturning moment for earthquke load =437.947 MNm while the totoal along-wind base bending moment = 938.370MNm for a
168m tall building. The along-wind loads is the one that dictates.
Find in Part D:
For SpaceGass Model A, the overturning moment at base is all taking by the core cell and the values is 939.370MNm which is nearly the same
compare to Part C value. The deflection at the top of the building is 850mm.
For SpaceGass Model B, the overturning moment at base is combining from the moment caused by core cell and coupling forces. The core cell
and the coupling forces take approximately 43.66% and 56.34% respectively of the total overturning base moment. The deflection at the top of
the building is 300mm.
The header beams in the Model B is increasing the coupling action and hence improving the overall lateral resistance. Therefore the
31