Works Cited Primary: Garcia, Jesus, Donna M. Ogle, C. Frederick Risinger, Joyce Stevos, and Winthrop D. Jordan.

"The Living Constitution." Creating America: A History of the United States. Evanston, Illinois; Boston; Dallas: McDougal Littell, 2001. 270. Print. This was the source from which I got the 14th Amendment text. I would say that this source is entirely reliable because it is quoting the amendment. As for bias, the only bias is that included in the amendment, which ironically is the one about bias/equality. This resource was very helpful in knowing the text of the Fourteenth Amendment so that I could write an essay about it. It is kind of hare to write about something you don't know. Regents of the University of California at Davis Medical School vs. Bakke. Supreme Court of the United States of America. 28 June 1978. Justia.com. Web. 2012. <http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/438/265/>. I think that this one is pretty reliable. After all, the page I was on was just the Supreme Courts decision. In which case, I suppose it is technically biased in Bakkes favor. This site was very helpful in finding the court decision. Secondary: "Affirmative Action." Home. Web. 2012. <http://www.wherevertheresafight.com/curriculum/affirmative_action>. I cite this only because I got a quote from the page. This was helpful in getting a quote for the third body paragraph. I haven't looked at the rest. "Fourteenth Amendment." Fourteenth Amendment. Ed. Charles J. Russo. 29 Dec. 2010. Web. 2012. <http://lawhighereducation.com/63-fourteenth-amendment.html>. I think this is a

reliable source. It lists facts about the topic, in this case the 14th Amendment. I am not sure about the bias, but I don't think I've found any on this page. This page was helpful for the first body paragraph, on the history of the amendment, and gave the most information about the topic. "Landmark Cases of the U.S. Supreme Court." Regents of the U. of California v. Bakke. Web. 2012. <http://www.streetlaw.org/en/landmark/cases/regents_of_the_u_of_california_v_bakke>. Streetlaw.org is generally reliable, and agrees with most other sources (I found one or two differences, but it was mostly the same). I couldn't find any bias, and everything shown was factual, with no opinions added. This source was the most helpful because I learned the general overview and many details from this site. Russo, Charles J. "Affirmative Action: Law and Higher Education." Affirmative Action: Law and Higher Education. 21 Nov. 2010. Web. 2012. <http://lawhighereducation.com/9affirmative-action.html>. This site helped me understand affirmative action, which was good because that was the main point of the case. The site posted facts and I think it was reliable, but it seemed to have a slight bias against affirmative action. Russo, Charles J. "Regents of the University of California v. Bakke." Regents of the University of California v. Bakke. 18 Jan. 2011. Web. 2012. <http://lawhighereducation.com/103regents-of-the-university-of-california-v-bakke.html>. This source was another useful page to learn about the actual case, and matched up with the other sites (like Streetlaw). I identified no bias on this particular page. This resource was especially helpful in verifying other sources.